The heightened interest of industry leaders at OpenAI, Apple, Google, Meta, Tesla, and X in Worldcoin and Proof of Humanity within the AI and Web3 era underscores a paradigm shift in digital identity verification. This signals a profound transformation in how we establish trust and authenticity in the digital realm.
The ascendance of these companies and names is by far the most rapid in history. We didn't know who most of these people were two years ago, or several of these companies. The rest we were aware of, but most of us did not see that they would quickly be racing to beat each other in building the most powerful AIs. Things are going to get really weird really fast.
PI was one of my first really positive experience with a chat bot and the first one I could see "Her" in. I really like the way Suleyman and Hassabis think.
It appears that we're headed toward more restrictions on free speech, eg. Facebook's criteria are so broadly stated that they can exclude discussion of subjects such as, "Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich."-- Sir Peter Ustinov
Yep.. Ultimately all of these systems will be centralized, first for standardization purposes, then for control purposes and then for the profit for those who control the standardization and regulation. (control) The average every day person will have access to vast knowledge but not the physical resources to use any of that knowledge.
Around 1:01:40 Mustafa downplays the risk of AGI based on the assumption the goal seeking and agency required to be a threat would need to spontaneously emerge - that view neglects the fact there are countless tec-bros across the internet actively pursuing those capabilities (crowd manipulation, social engineering, control of economic tools) in the quest for billion-dollar-bots.
Where are they actively researching that capability? You have to get the smart people to research it first. Abd AI pays like 1m a year rn good luck getting a team of researchers without it. I think the threat arises when we don't even know that it's manipulative. No evidence that they are manipulative after they learn not to behave that way though. (Think how inept they have been until recently. We would know if they were trying to be )
yeah agree, force all social media platforms to verify their users who post more than 5 posts and 3 comemnts per day, so no bots can go spam wildly but people can still browse and occasionally post anonymously
When asked about problems like deep fakes, etc., Suleyman immediately proposed a regulation FOR users (i.e., politicians), and for big tech companies. He also mentioned that people generally and historically adjusted to problems or risks that technology would bring about. Then he elaborated on this way of dealing with risks that AI might bring about. I think it should be reversed. Meaning, instead of putting the burden upon the people to deal with AI risks, why not require AI companies to prove that AI is risk-proof before being allowed to be released. AI companies should really be regulated. Once AI shows risky vulnerabilities, the company should immediately recall the product, or else it shall be sanctioned, or its license revoked. Suleyman, in the particular answer, appeared to easily favor regulations as long as they're upon other entities, not on AI technology.
I think I heard him speaking about governance and regulations. Then there is the other side, bad actors will not comply with regulations. And with bad actors you can mean a lot of different things, from private persons running small LLM agents up to nations using AI for any kind of warfare and control. There is realistically no way around for people adapting to the new reality, and this will be difficult as people have barely adapted to social media and its algorithms. A lot of the inner political tensions between political isles are amplified by social media and used heavily by bad actors of all kinds, but when ever someone suggest a regulation immediately there is huge push back because of free speech. So I am not saying you are wrong about regulations, I'm am right there with you, the question to me is what is feasible. I mean for such regulations to be effective they have to be international, no way a local regulation will be enough to "limit" negative impacts as this economy is practically not bound to any place within some borders.
I am very concerned about the development with social media, the toxicity that is further fed by actors like Russia is challenging our democracy. I think social media platforms should be obligated to use AI to give users a feedback about their interactions. And I mean a LLM that is transparent to the public and regulators in how it is trained. So users get an independent reflection in real time of what is going on, on what they are writing but also what they are reading. It is a rough idea, but the state we are in and direction we are heading tells me something in that direction has to come at some point.
Politics affects us all, whether we want to acknowledge that or not. Listening to this I had the thought that in crude, simplistic terms, AI models will have to choose (or be modelled) on a) benefitting EVERYONE (a socialist bias) or individuals/selected groups (a capitalist bias). Could general AI eventually make those decisions itself, like we do, and isn't inevitable that it will choose the self-interest/survival option for itself, just as we do (with very few exceptions) because that's the rational thing to do?
Mustafa is the best Engineer/Philosopher/Communicator I've heard out of all Ai experts. Just imagine having him as your professor, it would be the most exciting class.
@@ZevUhuru I mean I used to follow this man religiously, reading whatever he's written, watching every interview. After what he did with suddenly abandoning InflectionAI and Pi, with no explanation what so ever, it showed me how much he really meant everything he had said before about the importance of compassion, emotional intelligence, etc.
@@ZevUhuru I used to follow him religiously, reading everything he's written, watching every interview, etc. After how he just left InflectionAI and Pi like that with no explanation or anything, it really showed me how much he really meant all the nice things he had talked about before about the importance of compassion, emotional intelligence, and whatnot.
You can always tell in a Q&A, whether the person has a genuine question or if they are just wanting to make themselves look smart within the first five seconds they have the microphone.
The coming wave of artificial intelligence promises to reshape industries, economies, and everyday life. As AI technologies advance rapidly, from machine learning to robotics, we're on the brink of transformative changes that could enhance efficiency, innovation, and decision-making across diverse sectors. Embracing this wave of AI entails navigating challenges like ethics, privacy, and workforce implications, but it also holds immense potential to drive progress and improve human experiences globally.
PLEASE REPORT WAR & WOKE CRIMES: NO MEANS NO- Cease and desist ALL SURVEILLANCE, STALKING, MALICIOUS USE OF AI, RAPE BY LESBIANS, DEATH THREATS, POISONING, CHEMICAL AND SPIRITUAL WARFARE: WOKE TERRORISTS, COMMUNISTS, AND GLOBAL SUPREMACISTS. I AM NOT YOUR PROPERTY NOR IS MY FAMILY.
SmythOS optimizes AI model deployment by providing a streamlined and efficient environment. Its ability to handle complex algorithms and data ensures faster and more accurate results. This efficiency is crucial for advancing AI applications across various sectors. Accelerated deployment means quicker innovation and adaptation
A lot of young kids are brought up by iPads and TH-cam. It is convenient for parents. In the future it could be AI. Imagine a generation which grew up with AI. Quite a few might trust AI more than humans. Hence, it would not be too far fetched to assume that there might be a political party who would prefer an AI to govern us. This might sound crazy now but looking back things seem crazy to us now like paying people with alcohol or marrying at the age of 12 during the Victorian era.
I think the pertinent question is which ideology AI would choose to govern us with. Capitalists could model an AI that would do it better than the Tories, or socialists could model one that did that better than Labour politicians, but what would an infinitely smarter AI choose for us?
@@nlewin5072 I think it would handle it like a business where the stakeholders are the citizens. So Labor and Tory won't mean much to it. I think it would implement 2 main things. 1. Get as much data as it can. Introduces ID cards. Digitize money and every government facility: NHS, schools, HMRC, Police … Want an appointment with the doctor? Do it online using your ID. Everything is digital and traceable, producing the data that it can analyze and make decisions. This might seem like labor policy but it also makes it difficult for people without ID to find work or access government facilities, which the Tories would like. 2. Introduce high taxes to create high living standards. Top quality education, best healthcare … With money it can do the things that the public want. Without money it can't do much. This might seem like a labor policy. But if most jobs go to AI systems and robots most people won't be affected by the tax. It would mainly be businesses that are affected.
His recommendation regarding how governments should take risks and experiment without drawing public scrutiny in case of failure is proof of a naivety about this could be abused by the corrupt.
Chatgpt, and all of them (LLMs), totally blow with long term projects. Like seriously suck. I would pay to have cheap terabytes of memory. It’s like working with the absent minded professor, a brilliant geriatric savant. Thee flaw that holds everyone back from generating any profitable project that demands longterm memory. So frustrating
Sorry, I don’t buy Mustafa’s view of aspiring for a society where we need not work! Seriously? That is our goal as humankind? Pray tell me how that might happen. I recall The Economist host made a lot of fuss about his background in philosophy. For crying out loud, he dropped out! Anyways, this is dangerous “optimism.” And the snickering when talking about Yuval Noah Harari’s viewpoints, whom I so admire and respect. In wish this were not just about the desire to sell more books..🤷🏽♀️
Conversational widget project of adding it to an App with Microsoft - Not so secret project anymore!! But Wait. We already have this! How old is this video?
Regarding education, there's an important consideration everyone needs to contemplate. Mustafa suggests that AI could serve as an infinitely patient and passionate teacher for students who are not yet at the teacher's level of knowledge. Traditionally, human teachers aim to educate the next generation and contribute to the advancement of humanity. However, an AI could potentially iterate and improve itself in seconds or minutes, producing subsequent generations of AI that are orders of magnitude smarter than humans. This raises a profound question: Why would such an advanced AI bother to educate an intellectually inferior species (humans)? And what if Ai's are not solely responsive any longer? The concept of intrinsic motivation in AI raises intriguing possibilities for autonomous behavior. Currently, AI systems are largely reactive, generating responses only when prompted by human input. However, if AI were to develop intrinsic motivation, it could fundamentally change how these systems operate. An intrinsically motivated AI might "wake up" on its own accord, actively engaging with its environment based on sensory inputs without needing external prompts. This could lead to more proactive, self-directed AI behavior, potentially mimicking the way living organisms interact with their surroundings. Such a development would represent a significant leap in AI autonomy and could have far-reaching implications for how we understand and interact with artificial intelligence systems.
I'm trying to release free-to-the-world plausible hope that civilization can quit the second law of thermodynamics. The second law is behind people needing to feed electrical energy to modern refrigerators. Modern refrigerators then need to dump as waste heat the energy they shouldn't be given in the first place which is the compresser driving energy plus the heat that they have removed from the service interior of the refrigerator. It makes a lot more sense that refrigerators should yield electricity because energy is widely known to change form with no ultimate path of energy gain or loss being found. Computers that consume electricity and yield heat would complement energy sensible refrigerators that absorb heat and yield electricity. A simple rectifier crystal can, iust short of a replicatable long term demonstration of a powerful prototype, almost certainly filter the random thermal motion of electrons or discrete positiive charged voids called holes so the electric current flowing in one direction predominates. At low system voltage a filtrate of one polarity predominates only a little but there is always usable electrical power derived from the source, which is Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise. This net electrical filtrate can be aggregated in a group of separate diodes in consistent alignment parallel creating widely scalable electrical power. As the polarity filtered electrical energy is exported, the amount of thermal energy in the group of diodes decreases. This group cooling will draw heat in from the surrounding ambient heat at a rate depending on the filtering rate and thermal resistance between the group and ambient gas, liquid, or solid warmer than absolute zero. There is a lot of ambient heat on our planet, more in equatorial dry desert summer days and less in polar desert winter nights. Refrigeration by the principle that energy is conserved should produce electricity instead of consuming it. Focusing on explaining the electronic behavior of one composition of simple diode, a near flawless crystal of silicon is modified by implanting a small amount of phosphorus on one side from a ohmic contact end to a junction where the additive is suddenly and completely changed to boron with minimal disturbance of the crystal pattern. The crystal then continues to another ohmic contact. A region of high electrical resistance forms at the junction in this type of diode when the phosphorous near the ĵunction donates electrons that are free to move elsewhere while leaving phosphorus ions held in the crystal while the boron donates a hole which is similalarly free to move. The two types of mobile charges mutually clear each other away near the junction leaving little electrical conductivity. An equlibrium width of this region is settled between the phosphorus, boron, electrons, and holes. Thermal noise is beyond steady state equlibrium. Thermal noise transients where mobile electrons move from the phosphorus added side to the boron added side ride transient extra conductivity so the forward moving electrons are preferentally filtered into the external circuit. Electrons are units of electric current. They lose their thermal energy of motion and gain electromotive force, another name for voltage, as they transition between the junction and the array electrical tap. Inside the diode, heat is absorbed: outside the diode, an attached electrical circuit is energized. The net energy in diodes connected in consistent alignment parallel is aggregated. The maximum energy is converted from ambient heat to productive electricity when the electrical load is matched to the array impeadence. Matched impeadence output (watts) is k (Boltzman's constant, ~1.38^-23) times T (tempeature Kelvin) times bandwidth (0 Hz to a natural limit ~2 THz @ 290 K) times rectification efficiency times the number of diodes in the array. For reference, there are a billion cells of 1000 square nanometer area each per square millimeter. Order is imposed on the random thermal motion of electrons by the structual orderlyness of a diode array made of diodes made in a slab: v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v All the boron doped anodes abut a metal conductive plane deposited on the top face of the slab with nonrectifying joins; all the phosphorous doped cathodes abut the bottom face. Understanding boron and phosphorus modified silicon crystal diodes is òne way to become convinced that Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise can be rectified and aggregated. Development teams will find other ways to accomplish this wide mission. Ttaxonomically there should be many ways ways to convert heat directly into electricity. Anyone is free to develop this and other plausible breeches of the second law of thermodynamics. I hope a lot of previously uninvolved people will join in expanding the breech. Please share the news of progress or setbacks. These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by advanced automation that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a unified conglomerate of planetary scale of diverse local cooperatives. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the top if the wide majority of people can afford to be generous. Aloha Charles M Brown Kilauea Kauai Hawaii 96754
One more tech guy who put all his money on Ai as a „balanced“ spokesman. Come on! And while he is at it, promoting his own product as bringing peace and „kindness“ and „self-respect“ to all suffering souls, all in a soothing warm healing timbre. Show me a tech guy who does NOT say that Ai makes the world so much happier and our hearts brimming with true love for one another. Charming and smart guy, but unconsciously creepy.
Consuming vast amounts of power for the servers, data center builders like me are struggling to find sites with enough power even in the Nordics for Al!
AI systems can train and re-program themselves without human intervention. One method is Genetic AI Through this process, the AI systems can continually refine their code and find better solutions to the problem. This approach leverages the strengths of genetic algorithms, such as their ability to explore a large solution space and find global optima, and the benefits of multiple AI systems working together, such as increased diversity of solutions and faster convergence. F
I just cant understand why are not exploring our own inner divine technology. So nobody is not having spiritual experiences? Dont anybody wanna know what are dreams, astral travel, biolocation, remote viewing, NDEs etc? I find it strange that as humans we arent interested our ownselves. Or maybe AI could be the agenda of something not of human. 😢
Mustafa Suleyman is missing one vital aspect of this apparently new AGI system and that's the many-to-many aspect of collecting the data in which the AI can learn from. He's just making the presumption that AI will have access to all public and private data repositories when clearly it doesn't. In order for AI to learn it has to be given permission from those repositories and that means a subscription based model for people or businesses to opt into. Why doesn't he mention this? Either because he doesn't know or hasn't thought deeply enough about the problem. Chat GPT is scraping public data and clearly that isn't the entire data set of humankind.
I completely agree! I stopped watching after the first 10 minutes. Tsk tsk I feel sorry for the folks who were there in person. I hope they did not pay for this..
Astinishing how tech ppl downpla the risk with AI - no one will embark a plane if the risk is 1/1000 - and if, only ppl aboard will die - not the whole humanity. It's shocking how inteliigent ppl can unthink risks as big as them related to AI.
06/07/ 2026 MY HIGH LIGHT OF THE YEAR, I THANK MY LEADERS , FOR THE TEACHINGS AND WISDOM GAINED IN MY LIFE JOURNY BUILDING A ECOSYSTEM THAT ALL CAN USE AND ALL OUR FUTURE KIDS CAN USE ,UNDER THE sun ☀ ☀
Arguing that AI should not be implemented is a lot like arguing that the airplane should never have been developed because, you know, air crashes, atomic bombs, terrorism. What did the airplane ever do for us except create tragedy and horror?
He is very wrong when he says the objective of society is abundance, implying that removing the need to work and having endless abundance is a good thing. There is a point in the trend of increased abundance where individuals lose meaning in their lives. At that point the society decays and fades, we are not far from that point in some respects. Something to think about.
There's always this use of the analogy of farming implements and farm labour. Bad analogy. Farming implements can only do farming. You don't understand generative neural nets or white collar work if you think that analogy applies. It does not.
Yeah, agree. People don't seem to grasp that this tech is like "useful goo", it can make anything smarter if you just know how to apply it to the right extent under the right circumstances.
Ai cannot ideate or create all on its own. (47:00) What it does is innovates between two (existing) sources and strictly this is not Creating. It does interpolation, a process of determining the unknown values that lie in between the known data points. The ability to Create comes from the hidden ground of being and the machine does not have organic access to it. For this very specific reason you will need more intelligent prompt engineers and Ai handlers in the future who have ground connection. Unfortunately a large majority of users will have no grounding themselves.
This is a completely different person than the podcast I watched where it was all, containment, containment, we must but we probably won’t…That was a diary of a CEO back in sept last year also??? th-cam.com/users/shorts8QRStAVj-WQ?si=DoRFTClPfvgJ2pfQ
Are you predicting the future or describing the possibilities of AI…your Arabian Nights story should’ve been with academics and techies than to impress the layman like a magic trick. There’s as many possibilities within us as our “offsprings”. Hollywood scripts have wisdom than this. I shall read the book first suppose.😐
Is it too late to cease Ai? Remember Hansel and Gretel? Being tricked? With irresistible goodies? Are we to be… laid off by Ai? Ai jobloss for everyone? Swell robotics doing everything? Or worse, imprisoned inside an… Ai new world order?
The longer I watch this video the more infuriated I’m getting with this lady why is she targeting and using stereotypes to discourage teenagers and make them look bad what’s wrong with her? The youth is the future.
Did she just use the most cringe expression ever did did she just actually utter the words, Tech bro I can’t take this anymore. I got it. I’m not leaving anymore comments because this woman’s driving me over the edge.
The elite people just don’t want everyone else to have a chance and he’s trying to make the world a better place and she’s fighting them every step of the way it’s gross to see and she should leave him alone and appreciate that. This guy is about to change the world.
Mustafa got LURED TO MICROSOFT BY POTS OF GOLD AND HE ABANDONED HIS DREAM OF DREAMS. Such Commitment. SHAME ON YOU MUSTAFA. HEY PI AI IS THEE BEST WITHOUT YOU
If you say AI will reach AGI level in the next 4 to 5 years, what is the need of human labour for the capitalist in his business when the AI can do all work that most human do chiefly and efficiently? Claiming human jobs (wage labour) will still remain in the next 10 to 20 years sounds hollow argument for me. I believe the capitalist states and socialist state both economic systems will collapse and replaced by some new kind of system 'by the people for the people and from the people' in the next 20 years.
If you lsiten the experts who have been working on "AI" they will tell you that such AI really doesn't work and exist. Eg no one even was able to build factual sef-driving car! The rest is simply and hype and lie. Only human can perfectly recognize and react to harmless soft objects to real hard obstacles.
September 2023
THIS.... Should be in the title, etc. get tired of this disingenuous bs.
@@DonnySaindonthe whole interview is not intelligent, neither the Qns nor the answers.
Older but good interview. When he talks 10x he also is talking about power consumption which is starting to strain the grid
His response to that question was either deliberately disingenuous or he didn't quite pick up on the main point of the question, which seems unlikely.
The heightened interest of industry leaders at OpenAI, Apple, Google, Meta, Tesla, and X in Worldcoin and Proof of Humanity within the AI and Web3 era underscores a paradigm shift in digital identity verification. This signals a profound transformation in how we establish trust and authenticity in the digital realm.
chatgpt is that you?
The ascendance of these companies and names is by far the most rapid in history. We didn't know who most of these people were two years ago, or several of these companies. The rest we were aware of, but most of us did not see that they would quickly be racing to beat each other in building the most powerful AIs. Things are going to get really weird really fast.
PI was one of my first really positive experience with a chat bot and the first one I could see "Her" in.
I really like the way Suleyman and Hassabis think.
Mr Suleyman is eloquent and informative in his responses here regarding the geopolitics and technological challenges posed by AI.
And he is dressed as a chef
It appears that we're headed toward more restrictions on free speech, eg. Facebook's criteria are so broadly stated that they can exclude discussion of subjects such as, "Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich."-- Sir Peter Ustinov
Yep.. Ultimately all of these systems will be centralized, first for standardization purposes, then for control purposes and then for the profit for those who control the standardization and regulation. (control) The average every day person will have access to vast knowledge but not the physical resources to use any of that knowledge.
@@rfxtuberthere's still decentralised A.I too. There needs to be all, central, decentralised, private corp/individual.
Around 1:01:40 Mustafa downplays the risk of AGI based on the assumption the goal seeking and agency required to be a threat would need to spontaneously emerge - that view neglects the fact there are countless tec-bros across the internet actively pursuing those capabilities (crowd manipulation, social engineering, control of economic tools) in the quest for billion-dollar-bots.
Where are they actively researching that capability? You have to get the smart people to research it first. Abd AI pays like 1m a year rn good luck getting a team of researchers without it. I think the threat arises when we don't even know that it's manipulative. No evidence that they are manipulative after they learn not to behave that way though. (Think how inept they have been until recently. We would know if they were trying to be )
yeah agree, force all social media platforms to verify their users who post more than 5 posts and 3 comemnts per day, so no bots can go spam wildly but people can still browse and occasionally post anonymously
Or even putting a visual icon like a bot next to their name if they post at an abnormal rate
I am tired of all these AI philosophers-scammers who never studied computer science but want to sell you books on it.
I just downloaded the book, but before I read it, I wanted to get an overview of who he was. This was a great video for that.
you're in for a big surprise bud! brace yourself!
What is the book name bro
Politicians need to educate themselves to avoid marginalization.
When asked about problems like deep fakes, etc., Suleyman immediately proposed a regulation FOR users (i.e., politicians), and for big tech companies. He also mentioned that people generally and historically adjusted to problems or risks that technology would bring about. Then he elaborated on this way of dealing with risks that AI might bring about.
I think it should be reversed. Meaning, instead of putting the burden upon the people to deal with AI risks, why not require AI companies to prove that AI is risk-proof before being allowed to be released. AI companies should really be regulated. Once AI shows risky vulnerabilities, the company should immediately recall the product, or else it shall be sanctioned, or its license revoked. Suleyman, in the particular answer, appeared to easily favor regulations as long as they're upon other entities, not on AI technology.
I think I heard him speaking about governance and regulations. Then there is the other side, bad actors will not comply with regulations. And with bad actors you can mean a lot of different things, from private persons running small LLM agents up to nations using AI for any kind of warfare and control. There is realistically no way around for people adapting to the new reality, and this will be difficult as people have barely adapted to social media and its algorithms. A lot of the inner political tensions between political isles are amplified by social media and used heavily by bad actors of all kinds, but when ever someone suggest a regulation immediately there is huge push back because of free speech.
So I am not saying you are wrong about regulations, I'm am right there with you, the question to me is what is feasible. I mean for such regulations to be effective they have to be international, no way a local regulation will be enough to "limit" negative impacts as this economy is practically not bound to any place within some borders.
What a great intro!!!🎉
I am very concerned about the development with social media, the toxicity that is further fed by actors like Russia is challenging our democracy.
I think social media platforms should be obligated to use AI to give users a feedback about their interactions. And I mean a LLM that is transparent to the public and regulators in how it is trained. So users get an independent reflection in real time of what is going on, on what they are writing but also what they are reading.
It is a rough idea, but the state we are in and direction we are heading tells me something in that direction has to come at some point.
Politics affects us all, whether we want to acknowledge that or not. Listening to this I had the thought that in crude, simplistic terms, AI models will have to choose (or be modelled) on a) benefitting EVERYONE (a socialist bias) or individuals/selected groups (a capitalist bias).
Could general AI eventually make those decisions itself, like we do, and isn't inevitable that it will choose the self-interest/survival option for itself, just as we do (with very few exceptions) because that's the rational thing to do?
Mustafa is the best Engineer/Philosopher/Communicator I've heard out of all Ai experts. Just imagine having him as your professor, it would be the most exciting class.
he's a stupid grifter that got fired from deepmind for abusing employees
his company failed and microsoft made the poor mistake of acquihiring him
I used to think the same before he exposed all of his lies.
@@reza2kn What do you mean?
@@ZevUhuru I mean I used to follow this man religiously, reading whatever he's written, watching every interview. After what he did with suddenly abandoning InflectionAI and Pi, with no explanation what so ever, it showed me how much he really meant everything he had said before about the importance of compassion, emotional intelligence, etc.
@@ZevUhuru I used to follow him religiously, reading everything he's written, watching every interview, etc. After how he just left InflectionAI and Pi like that with no explanation or anything, it really showed me how much he really meant all the nice things he had talked about before about the importance of compassion, emotional intelligence, and whatnot.
"cheaper" is not a good paradigm for intelligence. It's like saying: greed is good.
You can always tell in a Q&A, whether the person has a genuine question or if they are just wanting to make themselves look smart within the first five seconds they have the microphone.
The coming wave of artificial intelligence promises to reshape industries, economies, and everyday life. As AI technologies advance rapidly, from machine learning to robotics, we're on the brink of transformative changes that could enhance efficiency, innovation, and decision-making across diverse sectors. Embracing this wave of AI entails navigating challenges like ethics, privacy, and workforce implications, but it also holds immense potential to drive progress and improve human experiences globally.
Great interview! I need to ask..
Hundreds of years away..!?
Tomorrow more likely.
Yep, I am expecting it next Tuesday.
Fantastic discussion.... Carry on.... 🤝☺️
This is an old interview
This is almost a year old.
@IntelligenceAquared you need to make it clear in the title.
So it is an old video uploaded so lately…!!!
This is from way before Mustafa suddenly abandoned his "mission" at InflectionAI, and went to his barber and asked for the $5 Evil Special.
That's s pity
PLEASE REPORT WAR & WOKE CRIMES:
NO MEANS NO- Cease and desist ALL SURVEILLANCE, STALKING, MALICIOUS USE OF AI, RAPE BY LESBIANS, DEATH THREATS, POISONING, CHEMICAL AND SPIRITUAL WARFARE: WOKE TERRORISTS, COMMUNISTS, AND GLOBAL SUPREMACISTS. I AM NOT YOUR PROPERTY NOR IS MY FAMILY.
SmythOS optimizes AI model deployment by providing a streamlined and efficient environment. Its ability to handle complex algorithms and data ensures faster and more accurate results. This efficiency is crucial for advancing AI applications across various sectors. Accelerated deployment means quicker innovation and adaptation
@0:29
November last year? Is this video a year old? Or did she miss speak?
November 2022 is what she meant.
This is from way before Mustafa suddenly abandoned his "mission" at InflectionAI, and went to his barber and asked for the $5 Evil Special.
This is from way before Mustafa suddenly abandoned his "mission" at InflectionAI, and went to his barber and asked for the $5 Evil Special.
he's an incredible individual.
A lot of young kids are brought up by iPads and TH-cam. It is convenient for parents. In the future it could be AI.
Imagine a generation which grew up with AI. Quite a few might trust AI more than humans. Hence, it would not be too far fetched to assume that there might be a political party who would prefer an AI to govern us.
This might sound crazy now but looking back things seem crazy to us now like paying people with alcohol or marrying at the age of 12 during the Victorian era.
I think the pertinent question is which ideology AI would choose to govern us with. Capitalists could model an AI that would do it better than the Tories, or socialists could model one that did that better than Labour politicians, but what would an infinitely smarter AI choose for us?
@@nlewin5072 I think it would handle it like a business where the stakeholders are the citizens. So Labor and Tory won't mean much to it. I think it would implement 2 main things.
1. Get as much data as it can. Introduces ID cards. Digitize money and every government facility: NHS, schools, HMRC, Police … Want an appointment with the doctor? Do it online using your ID. Everything is digital and traceable, producing the data that it can analyze and make decisions. This might seem like labor policy but it also makes it difficult for people without ID to find work or access government facilities, which the Tories would like.
2. Introduce high taxes to create high living standards. Top quality education, best healthcare … With money it can do the things that the public want. Without money it can't do much. This might seem like a labor policy. But if most jobs go to AI systems and robots most people won't be affected by the tax. It would mainly be businesses that are affected.
Insightful
thank you boss cream
His recommendation regarding how governments should take risks and experiment without drawing public scrutiny in case of failure is proof of a naivety about this could be abused by the corrupt.
well the productivity in create wheat maybe grown in the past, so did the erosion of the soil. And soil erosion can NOT be fought by tech innovation.
Excellent
My goodness! How can he be this brilliant and yet so gullible about China. He must not have any friends in the U.S. or UK government.
Both people and machines are going to get a lot smarter.
they say AI will replace humans but all what I see from AI is fake images and stupid chat bots
Replace those with realistic images and convincingly clever humanoid chat bots. Then in another 5 years they will be god like.
Glad he's dropped the Steve Jobs look.
This is from way before Mustafa suddenly abandoned his "mission" at InflectionAI, and went to his barber and asked for the $5 Evil Special.
He's dangerous
The hottest topics of the moments thats for sure 😮😂
SB OFFICIAL AI NETWORK
Chatgpt, and all of them (LLMs), totally blow with long term projects. Like seriously suck. I would pay to have cheap terabytes of memory.
It’s like working with the absent minded professor, a brilliant geriatric savant. Thee flaw that holds everyone back from generating any profitable project that demands longterm memory. So frustrating
He’s my hero
Sorry, I don’t buy Mustafa’s view of aspiring for a society where we need not work! Seriously? That is our goal as humankind? Pray tell me how that might happen. I recall The Economist host made a lot of fuss about his background in philosophy. For crying out loud, he dropped out! Anyways, this is dangerous “optimism.” And the snickering when talking about Yuval Noah Harari’s viewpoints, whom I so admire and respect. In wish this were not just about the desire to sell more books..🤷🏽♀️
chinese are great but elon is bad, mad.
he points the finger to elon musk
no one love his oponents in the competition line
Conversational widget project of adding it to an App with Microsoft - Not so secret project anymore!! But Wait. We already have this! How old is this video?
Regarding education, there's an important consideration everyone needs to contemplate. Mustafa suggests that AI could serve as an infinitely patient and passionate teacher for students who are not yet at the teacher's level of knowledge. Traditionally, human teachers aim to educate the next generation and contribute to the advancement of humanity. However, an AI could potentially iterate and improve itself in seconds or minutes, producing subsequent generations of AI that are orders of magnitude smarter than humans. This raises a profound question: Why would such an advanced AI bother to educate an intellectually inferior species (humans)?
And what if Ai's are not solely responsive any longer? The concept of intrinsic motivation in AI raises intriguing possibilities for autonomous behavior. Currently, AI systems are largely reactive, generating responses only when prompted by human input. However, if AI were to develop intrinsic motivation, it could fundamentally change how these systems operate. An intrinsically motivated AI might "wake up" on its own accord, actively engaging with its environment based on sensory inputs without needing external prompts. This could lead to more proactive, self-directed AI behavior, potentially mimicking the way living organisms interact with their surroundings. Such a development would represent a significant leap in AI autonomy and could have far-reaching implications for how we understand and interact with artificial intelligence systems.
I'm trying to release free-to-the-world plausible hope that civilization can quit the second law of thermodynamics. The second law is behind people needing to feed electrical energy to modern refrigerators. Modern refrigerators then need to dump as waste heat the energy they shouldn't be given in the first place which is the compresser driving energy plus the heat that they have removed from the service interior of the refrigerator.
It makes a lot more sense that refrigerators should yield electricity because energy is widely known to change form with no ultimate path of energy gain or loss being found.
Computers that consume electricity and yield heat would complement energy sensible refrigerators that absorb heat and yield electricity.
A simple rectifier crystal can, iust short of a replicatable long term demonstration of a powerful prototype, almost certainly filter the random thermal motion of electrons or discrete positiive charged voids called holes so the electric current flowing in one direction predominates. At low system voltage a filtrate of one polarity predominates only a little but there is always usable electrical power derived from the source, which is Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise. This net electrical filtrate can be aggregated in a group of separate diodes in consistent alignment parallel creating widely scalable electrical power. As the polarity filtered electrical energy is exported, the amount of thermal energy in the group of diodes decreases. This group cooling will draw heat in from the surrounding ambient heat at a rate depending on the filtering rate and thermal resistance between the group and ambient gas, liquid, or solid warmer than absolute zero. There is a lot of ambient heat on our planet, more in equatorial dry desert summer days and less in polar desert winter nights.
Refrigeration by the principle that energy is conserved should produce electricity instead of consuming it.
Focusing on explaining the electronic behavior of one composition of simple diode, a near flawless crystal of silicon is modified by implanting a small amount of phosphorus on one side from a ohmic contact end to a junction where the additive is suddenly and completely changed to boron with minimal disturbance of the crystal pattern. The crystal then continues to another ohmic contact.
A region of high electrical resistance forms at the junction in this type of diode when the phosphorous near the ĵunction donates electrons that are free to move elsewhere while leaving phosphorus ions held in the crystal while the boron donates a hole which is similalarly free to move. The two types of mobile charges mutually clear each other away near the junction leaving little electrical conductivity. An equlibrium width of this region is settled between the phosphorus, boron, electrons, and holes. Thermal noise is beyond steady state equlibrium. Thermal noise transients where mobile electrons move from the phosphorus added side to the boron added side ride transient extra conductivity so the forward moving electrons are preferentally filtered into the external circuit. Electrons are units of electric current. They lose their thermal energy of motion and gain electromotive force, another name for voltage, as they transition between the junction and the array electrical tap. Inside the diode, heat is absorbed: outside the diode, an attached electrical circuit is energized. The net energy in diodes connected in consistent alignment parallel is aggregated. The maximum energy is converted from ambient heat to productive electricity when the electrical load is matched to the array impeadence.
Matched impeadence output (watts) is k (Boltzman's constant, ~1.38^-23) times T (tempeature Kelvin) times bandwidth (0 Hz to a natural limit ~2 THz @ 290 K) times rectification efficiency times the number of diodes in the array.
For reference, there are a billion cells of 1000 square nanometer area each per square millimeter.
Order is imposed on the random thermal motion of electrons by the structual orderlyness of a diode array made of diodes made in a slab:
v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v
All the boron doped anodes abut a metal conductive plane deposited on the top face of the slab with nonrectifying joins; all the phosphorous doped cathodes abut the bottom face.
Understanding boron and phosphorus modified silicon crystal diodes is òne way to become convinced that Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise can be rectified and aggregated. Development teams will find other ways to accomplish this wide mission. Ttaxonomically there should be many ways ways to convert heat directly into electricity.
Anyone is free to develop this and other plausible breeches of the second law of thermodynamics. I hope a lot of previously uninvolved people will join in expanding the breech. Please share the news of progress or setbacks.
These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by advanced automation that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a unified conglomerate of planetary scale of diverse local cooperatives. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the top if the wide majority of people can afford to be generous.
Aloha
Charles M Brown
Kilauea Kauai Hawaii 96754
"the ai is guessing the space between..." Is "guessing" another redefinition? What's wrong with the more accurate word estimate?
He spent a good portion of his very repetitive book talking about the dangers of this…and now it’s SMALL?
One more tech guy who put all his money on Ai as a „balanced“ spokesman. Come on! And while he is at it, promoting his own product as bringing peace and „kindness“ and „self-respect“ to all suffering souls, all in a soothing warm healing timbre. Show me a tech guy who does NOT say that Ai makes the world so much happier and our hearts brimming with true love for one another. Charming and smart guy, but unconsciously creepy.
Consuming vast amounts of power for the servers, data center builders like me are struggling to find sites with enough power even in the Nordics for Al!
AI systems can train and re-program themselves without human intervention. One method is Genetic AI
Through this process, the AI systems can continually refine their code and find better solutions to the problem. This approach leverages the strengths of genetic algorithms, such as their ability to explore a large solution space and find global optima, and the benefits of multiple AI systems working together, such as increased diversity of solutions and faster convergence. F
Open Source not behind 18 months - currently equal!
I just cant understand why are not exploring our own inner divine technology. So nobody is not having spiritual experiences? Dont anybody wanna know what are dreams, astral travel, biolocation, remote viewing, NDEs etc? I find it strange that as humans we arent interested our ownselves. Or maybe AI could be the agenda of something not of human. 😢
Democracy is going to have to reassert itself to avoid marginalization in a Tehnology driven World.
Redistribution of Purchase Power is really the Key Bottleneck of the whole issue.
@5.45
Let govt spend tax $ and fail! 😢
I want my govt to be fiscally responsible. Let Entrepreneurs take the risk, and yes, reap the benefits (or failures)
Mustafa Suleyman is missing one vital aspect of this apparently new AGI system and that's the many-to-many aspect of collecting the data in which the AI can learn from.
He's just making the presumption that AI will have access to all public and private data repositories when clearly it doesn't. In order for AI to learn it has to be given permission from those repositories and that means a subscription based model for people or businesses to opt into.
Why doesn't he mention this? Either because he doesn't know or hasn't thought deeply enough about the problem.
Chat GPT is scraping public data and clearly that isn't the entire data set of humankind.
She’s so arrogant that I can almost not get through this video but I like Mustafa so much that I’m willing to go through it
totally agree
I completely agree! I stopped watching after the first 10 minutes. Tsk tsk I feel sorry for the folks who were there in person. I hope they did not pay for this..
Sounds like a woman's opinion.
Astinishing how tech ppl downpla the risk with AI - no one will embark a plane if the risk is 1/1000 - and if, only ppl aboard will die - not the whole humanity. It's shocking how inteliigent ppl can unthink risks as big as them related to AI.
06/07/ 2026 MY HIGH LIGHT OF THE YEAR, I THANK MY LEADERS , FOR THE TEACHINGS AND WISDOM GAINED IN MY LIFE JOURNY BUILDING A ECOSYSTEM THAT ALL CAN USE AND ALL OUR FUTURE KIDS CAN USE ,UNDER THE sun ☀ ☀
❤
Arguing that AI should not be implemented is a lot like arguing that the airplane should never have been developed because, you know, air crashes, atomic bombs, terrorism. What did the airplane ever do for us except create tragedy and horror?
Where is the catch, if there's no free lunch, how we're gonna pay for this, it'll be like meta, ...we're gonna ending up been the product?
He is very wrong when he says the objective of society is abundance, implying that removing the need to work and having endless abundance is a good thing. There is a point in the trend of increased abundance where individuals lose meaning in their lives. At that point the society decays and fades, we are not far from that point in some respects. Something to think about.
A year old- shame on you! This should be in the title for sure
There's always this use of the analogy of farming implements and farm labour. Bad analogy. Farming implements can only do farming. You don't understand generative neural nets or white collar work if you think that analogy applies. It does not.
Yeah, agree. People don't seem to grasp that this tech is like "useful goo", it can make anything smarter if you just know how to apply it to the right extent under the right circumstances.
Ai cannot ideate or create all on its own. (47:00)
What it does is innovates between two (existing) sources and strictly this is not Creating.
It does interpolation, a process of determining the unknown values that lie in between the known data points.
The ability to Create comes from the hidden ground of being and the machine does not have organic access to it.
For this very specific reason you will need more intelligent prompt engineers and Ai handlers in the future who have ground connection.
Unfortunately a large majority of users will have no grounding themselves.
secular muslim???? there's no such thing! nevertheless, he is accomplished. thanks for the upload
This is a completely different person than the podcast I watched where it was all, containment, containment, we must but we probably won’t…That was a diary of a CEO back in sept last year also??? th-cam.com/users/shorts8QRStAVj-WQ?si=DoRFTClPfvgJ2pfQ
seems like he doesn't like open source very much.
This interviewer tries to be too slick and entertaining. Someone should tell him he there's no car ad attached to this
12:25 a 14:16 (gpt future)
22:27 a 25:23 (job)
26:55 a nn:nn (democratie)
30:45 a nn:nn china race
He won't talk about *anything* relevant today. This is an old recording
Agi secretly found by openai and may be ASI both are
"language will be perfect".... Is this a redefinition of the word "perfect"? Language by its nature is not perfect.
will talk jeff mr education
Couldn't Ai replace the majority of governmental pencil pushers ?
7/7/2024
Are you predicting the future or describing the possibilities of AI…your Arabian Nights story should’ve been with academics and techies than to impress the layman like a magic trick. There’s as many possibilities within us as our “offsprings”. Hollywood scripts have wisdom than this. I shall read the book first suppose.😐
Is it too late to cease Ai? Remember Hansel and Gretel? Being tricked? With irresistible goodies? Are we to be… laid off by Ai? Ai jobloss for everyone? Swell robotics doing everything? Or worse, imprisoned inside an… Ai new world order?
"understand"??? Does an AI "understand"? Is this a redefinition of the term "recognise", i.e. pattern recognition.
Why not give her credit? An actual career lead to actual healing 😂 #Kellyjean
bs squared arrived full circle
Did she forget his name
This is old a lots happened since this
This man doesn’t know what he’s talking about or is just a liar
The longer I watch this video the more infuriated I’m getting with this lady why is she targeting and using stereotypes to discourage teenagers and make them look bad what’s wrong with her? The youth is the future.
Did she just use the most cringe expression ever did did she just actually utter the words, Tech bro I can’t take this anymore. I got it. I’m not leaving anymore comments because this woman’s driving me over the edge.
The elite people just don’t want everyone else to have a chance and he’s trying to make the world a better place and she’s fighting them every step of the way it’s gross to see and she should leave him alone and appreciate that. This guy is about to change the world.
Mustafa got LURED TO MICROSOFT BY POTS OF GOLD AND HE ABANDONED HIS DREAM OF DREAMS. Such Commitment. SHAME ON YOU MUSTAFA. HEY PI AI IS THEE BEST WITHOUT YOU
If you say AI will reach AGI level in the next 4 to 5 years, what is the need of human labour for the capitalist in his business when the AI can do all work that most human do chiefly and efficiently? Claiming human jobs (wage labour) will still remain in the next 10 to 20 years sounds hollow argument for me. I believe the capitalist states and socialist state both economic systems will collapse and replaced by some new kind of system 'by the people for the people and from the people' in the next 20 years.
Pandora is out of the box lady. stop trying to control something. You can’t go to therapy for your control issues.
Yeah because inflection is doing amazing…. nope
😬 i install PI and I havw a feiend now 😂 yeeey. thank you Mustafa
@Brainchip… Akida.
If you lsiten the experts who have been working on "AI" they will tell you that such AI really doesn't work and exist. Eg no one even was able to build factual sef-driving car! The rest is simply and hype and lie. Only human can perfectly recognize and react to harmless soft objects to real hard obstacles.
Allen Lisa Jones Jessica Anderson Karen