EAS Scenario: September 11th... 1998 (Alternate History)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 เม.ย. 2022
- The planning of 9/11 was split between Osama bin Laden, the leader of al-Qaeda, and Khalid Skeikh Mohammed, the architect of the plan. Of the two, OBL was the realist whereas KSM was more of a dreamer. KSM had plans so big that even OBL wouldn't approve them. But what if he had?
- เกม
![จังหวะนี้ - เม้ก อภิสิทธิ์ [ Official MV ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4gQRZCkRyiU/mqdefault.jpg)
This was the exact plan of Phase III of the Bojinka Plot. The Wikipedia article here (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bojinka_plot ) describes exactly how it would've played out.
Very scary to think this was the original plan.
It's very scary to think this horrifying event would have been a quarter century old
This channel is super underrated...
Thank you so much! That means a lot to me. Feel free to share my content, and be sure to subscribe if you haven't already because on Wednesday I release a new 45-minute EAS scenario!
Watching this on 9/11 hits differently
A year later it still is
Suggestion: Make like a few seconds of actual TV and then do the cutoff and alerts.
He should do a redux of this scenario. But how would he do it for the fictional attacks that take place.
Good work keep going
A valiant effort, but a few things to consider for this scenario-
I don't know of any EAS alerts that went out on the actual day. That being said, sustained attack like what was proposed would likely warrant one.
The trick most EAS scenarios fall for is being too alliterative, and hedge in music and storytelling elements which an alert would not include. This showed discretion, but deserves an expanded media view... which I'm aware is a tall order ; but exploring how 1998 era news/media, and most importantly telephone services would respond would take this scenario to the next level.
Still, I'm impressed. It's sharply made and well focused.
Honestly I know the 2001 attack changed everything, but... I wonder how things would change in this scenario.
For starters, I think there would be a lot more panic over Y2K. With so many people involved in this scenario, the government looks incompetent that they didn't have any intel or defenses. (Y2K prep did quite a bit to inform the 2001 9/11 response).
To be candid I don't see how anyone survives too much longer in this timeline. IF the whole United States had been under attack on 9-11-1998, there is simply no good reason why Martial Law would not have been declared from the White House, and from there a semi-permanent escalation to Defense Condition 2 would have happened. People forget this is the same Bill Clinton who casually ordered early and repeated missile strikes just to pacify Bosnia, in a conflict that the United States wasn't even a part of. The response would NOT have been as compromised by Big Oil interests as G.W. Bush's was from 2001 onward in the mainstream timeline.
No, seriously, this scenario would lead to nuclear aggression against the Arab Peninsula inside of six months tops, if not six days. Once Clinton found out this was an Arab plot (primarily) carried out by Arabs, we would be one bad minute away from World War III. And with our attention bent towards the Arab Peninsula, the entire rest of the nuclear-capable world would likely see fit to lash out against us just because. QED the world dies, becomes unfit for bacteria by and large.
Now in GTA 3 we can drive airplanes Unlike Liberty city stories
Very well done
just imagine it being a normal 1998 morning of september 11.
then a plane speeds through new york, a few crashed into the wtc AND THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING, that’s just losing two great things
False. Anything that entered St. Louis metro area airspace would've been shot down by the Arch's lasers.
As someone who was born in Boston, Massachusetts (almost nothing in terms of distance) from Boston this hits hard and makes me feel violated (Not hating on the video) the fact it makes me feel this way honestly proves how well this was made and how much more impactful this would have been (not saying 9/11 was not a terrifying thing that changed history forever it certainly did.)
It is very chilling that in this scenario there are more planes involved
Pretty please stop following me a6 intruder
@@augologothat was a year earlier. Damn you pretty much follow a big majority of them
@@Interdictiondeltawing u right a lot of these eas scenarios hit different edit: spelling
Okay, after a few of these had happened, USAF would have fighters scrambled from every airbase and ANG base in the U.S. to knock down the aircraft still flying after the grounding order. Washington, D.C. was a CAP-patrolled no-fly zone following the Pentagon attack, so the White House would've been under CAP protection before President Clinton's address.
BTW, did you get Prof. Stephen Hawking to record your voice-overs before his death? That was a stroke of genius.
You are correct. This scenario is biased heavily in favor of the attackers, for one simple reason; I made a conscious decision to forgo full realism in favor of dramatizing the worst-case scenario because 1) it makes for better drama, and 2) very few people know there was a larger plan and so I used it as an educational/illustrative opportunity.
Fun fact: Stephen Hawking used the same voice formerly used by NOAA Weather Radio and the Emergency Alert System from 1996 to 2002! It's the Paul voice from the old DECTALK software.
If it played out in a way not favoring the attackers, fighters would have been scambled after NY.One plane is an accident, two planes is an attack
@@yaboikms5469 Exactly, and that wouldn't have made a very interesting or informative EAS scenario. "The attacks as you know played out, and as for the rest, they all got shot down."
I wanted to make this both interesting and informative, and to do both of those most effectively I decided to make the attack a complete success, however unlikely that may be.
@@Sorunia I understand completely.As tragic as 9/11 was we could be living in an entirely different reality if the events shown here weren't stopped
The fighter jets weren't on readiness for 9/11 is my understanding.
All the station listed are Real life stations (WCVB and WABC are affiliated with ABC, KTLA is affiliated with the CW, WUSA is affiliated with CBS, and WRC is an affiliate of NBC. We did not get a single Fox station)
Probably because fox was one of the newest stations at the time
@@nerdfacegaming7824 That's one reason, but that brings us to an error I made, actually: KTLA is a CW station, which didn't exist until 2006. Fox actually would have made more sense there.
That Would be Twice the deaths If That Actually Happened
Man the impression of the president is great! Who did this?
That is a text-to-speech deepfake, actually. Technology is getting impressive! The website is fakeyou.com.
This hits different… I love the Empire State Building and if it got attacked I wouldn’t know how’d I react and the thought of how much more people would die scares me
I’d like to point out some incorrections of this plane.
1. Empire State Building was not a target.
2. Transamerica Pyramid in San Francisco was not attacked.
I've never seen somebody use AI for one of these scenarios. Cool.
9/11 but in 1998. Interesting
And in much greater scale of magnitude.
If we're sticking with the Sept 11th date may as well do the Chilean coup d'état
how did you create the glitch effect a 2:11
Nice
this is a great EAS scenario.
but why the hell is youtube giving that stupid warning and slapping it on a alternative timeline fictional story? like this is just a work of fiction, and there ain't anyone dumb enough to believe this is real.
I think it does it if anybody every has “9/11” “September 11th” or any buzzwords for the day.
@@Bloxxify1 dude are you having a stroke or a keyboard tantrum?
@@Zeakthecat ??? what did i type wrong?
@@Bloxxify1what did you type wrong?
dude, i could not understand what you said. the grammar was lacking dude. i don't even know what you are talking about. if you weren't having either a stroke or a keyboard tantrum, then i suggest rephrasing what you said.
@@Zeakthecat damn, i didnt know some innocent misspelling could piss someone off that much, my apologies i guess.
Do a part two
Why was it chosen to be 9/11? Flashbacks.
This is primarily intended to serve as an illustrative educational video about the Bojinka Plot and its variant plans, the most notable of which became 9/11. Many people are unaware of the history behind the attacks and do not know it was originally supposed to be even worse. This video shows what the worst-case scenario would be had the original plan taken place.
Even though the system was never used on our 9/11.
I know that voice that’s old Paul
Little P.S: Flight 175 in real life was a United Airlines flight and not American
Was this the original plan
It was, first conceived as the "Bojinka Plot" and later modified into this plan, which itself later became 9/11
@@Sorunia thank you for the info
Sounds real
But I thought Twin towers attack happened in September 11th 2001
Or was this fake like a Senerio
But how come it's happening in 1998
It is real because I was born on May 21st 1997
This is very Shocking and scary 😨 and Rare
Could people even use cell phones from Airplanes in 1998?
Probably, but if so, then very rare.
@@unde4dmemesauce exactly. simply put, UA93 crashed because nobody had a cell phone to call the ground like they did IRL, so they never knew about the other attacks and never staged a passgenger revolt
Lol. You just copied George w bush's speech (sort of) and used a voice changer for bill clinton.
Dude your sending needless hate on all of his videos. Please be quiet, you self centered child.
you're historically aware, i see - yes, i looked at GWB's actual 9/11 address and rephrased it to sound more like how clinton talked. good observation!
Ebs
No, the EBS was replaced by EAS in 1997. This scenario is set in 1998, so it's EAS.
USA prepared all this... They knew what was going to happen.
should probably let you know that this isnt any sort of found footage, this was made for entertainment
one month late but better late than never
I wouldn’t make a eas on this tbh
@coolkoshii huh?
The original EAS were for nuclear attacks. Making these EAS was referencing that.