Join this channel to get access to perks: / @dinoguy8 Support the Channel: / dinoguy Also check out my other social media! ⬇️ Instagram: / dino.guy88 TikTok: / prehistoric_page Discord: / discord
I think the reason a lot of the dinosaurs look different in this movie, is because they were probably Ingen's first ever attempt at cloning extinct animals Adding to that, the dinosaurs are probably suffering from inbreeding, due to the fact they probably had small populations before they started reproducing + they live in an island, so, because of that, they probably get weird mutations that make them look even weirder than before
Someone brought up how the Quetzelcoatlus in this movie is most likely an InGen clone. Where as the one in Dominion was a Biosyn clone. I actually feel that makes more sense as in Dominion, they explain that their clones are pure and real. Whereas InGen’s clones all have other DNA within them. Of course they look different. The one in Rebirth is a genetic mishmash, and the one in Dominion is a true Quetz.
Titanosaurus design and color scheme is based on the Kaiju Titanosaurus from the early Godzilla films. It’s cool that Gareth Edwards (director of Godzilla 2014) is still showing love to the franchise.
I like the design of the dinos and the other prehistoric reptiles, I am optimistic about the mutant dinosaur which is somewhat like real-life science that when making a new creature there are going to be failed experiments
The mutant existing can make sense. The scientists who made it raising it into a mature adult when it is already a failed experiment useless as a theme park attraction is just silly.
Might have been why they were left there as well as having the tail paddle and short legs and since that didn’t align with the public’s perception of spinosaurus in the late 80/early 90s they didn’t use it they talk about stuff like that in the first book
I’d do love the new Mosasaurus and the spinosaurus still looks amazing even if not fully accurate, still a major awesome look that looks like the irl animal
What i understood from this trailer is that this new island seems to be the first actual research facility, when the scientists didn't fully know how to clone extinct animals yet. So, i guess that when they managed to clone their first dinosaurs, they were very different from the ones we saw in the JP movie, and that's probably why they look weird, specially that mutant abomination thing plus there's also the chance of the dinosaurs suffering from inbreeding, since (i think) this island is smaller than the other ones, which means it can't accomodate a large enough population of each dinosaur species
Would you say it's freakier than the offspring in Alien Romolus? Because rebirth seems to be using the mutant for the 3rd act of the movie like Romolus did with offspring.
@@legendary5733 I would say it’s freakier, but maybe just because it was just revealed. Alien has been going on for ages with the movies constantly getting weird designs. Jurassic World, while having hybrids, has never done anything like this, so it definitely hits hard.
@ThatFunnyTortoise I did heard they are more than just one mutant in this movie based on the leaks. One is meant to be something like with multiple arms. While the other is more xenomorph design. But I could be wrong, personally for me I like mutant creature since I'm sucker for something grotesque abomination designs. And also Offspring in Romolus was creepy but I am one of the minorities that likes the Newborn from Alien resurrection. This mutant is like a mixture of both that I like about it.
The Vanity Fair article describes the mutant as like a mashup of Star Wars Rancor, Alien xenomorph, and a T. rex. As far as why as some of the designs have aspects that look off (the Titanosaurus sails, and whip like tail, the Quetzalcoatlus crest, the croc like head of the Spinosaurus), but are largely up to date (Titanosaurus proportions, tail aside, the Quetzalcoatlus with the feathers, the Spinosaurus with the large rounded sail, and what seems to be the big paddle tail too) the Vanity Fair article also has an explanation: “These are the dinosaurs that didn’t work. There’s some mutations in there,” Marshall says. “They’re all based on real dinosaur research, but they look a little different.” I think it isn't far off from the original Jurassic Park's design direction. They were mostly up to date for the times in their anatomy, which the exception of the artistic license used (Dilophosaurus frill and being undersized/juvenile, the raptor being oversized, Brachiosaurus chewing like a cow, etc). Or even the original novel with the version numbers. Also folks have surely mentioned this, but I have no doubts the sails on the Titanosaurus is a fun callback to the Godzilla Kaiju Titanosaurus which also has orange sails on it. Edwards also directed a Godzilla film after all. The Mattel toy listings that were revealed early by accident from a certain website (starts with an E) does confirm a Utahraptor is coming. Who knows if it's just them doing their own thing, or if it will be in the film yet. That said the JWE2 design is absolute peak, so anything lesser will possibly disappoint (unless it looks like the classic Kenner toy. I would be fine with that too).
@@Firestar-TV Yep, it's included in the Cretaceous Predators DLC which also included Concavenator, Gigantoraptor, and the Camp Cretaceous Tarbosaurus. It was the third to last DLC to release, back in Dec 23 if I recall.
Nah the spino turned into a literal crocodile with a robust short neck and wide crocodilian mouth instead of the stork-like fish trappers JP3 had, it ended up being a sailed pliosaur at this point. They massacred spino so bad lol
hi! at some point i will become a patron because I have been watching your videos for about a year, because no one but you understands how awesome dinosaurs are and how much I love them. my favorite dinosaur is Maip Macrothorax, and while you cant really do a many interpretations of video on maip, I would love to see a many interpretations of megaraptors! thanks!
Don't think it's two headed. I think the Utahraptor Theory makes more Sense, especially since there are not only failed Experiments but also Species that were thought to be too dangerous for the Park
that big thing is a mutant from the original lore of the books. they had planned to add it in the first jurassic park film, but due to some problems, they couldn't. very happy to see it there. it's kind of like the canonical wolverine costume in the latest film
Even if the D-Rex is a quote on quote “Mutant” it doesn’t rly change the fact it looks like a alien 😭 when I think of a Mutant dinosaur I think of a Trex with jagged teeth with thick extra Osteoderms, quills and maybe two extra arms but ya that thing looks straight out of the Alien movies 😭 I’m still excited for the movie though, who knows it may change my mind on the design but so far I don’t like it but if you do that’s ok, all opinions are valid.
late last year a toy site posted listings early ( they got taken down withing 48 hours ) and one of them was a electronic utahraptor, so when i saw those beefier looking feet i had the same thought.
Not necessarily. It bears a resemblance to a dimetrodon, albeit larger. The only notable designs are the mosa, Rex, and the sail and tail of the spinossaurus. However, the head, neck, and the quetz resembles the dragons from Avatar.
My problem with the D. Rex is why another monster? Jurassic as a franchise Is known for having dinosaurs and having another hybrid thing for the forth time is getting to much. I have mix thoughts with all three previous hybrids, but I’d there’s one thing I like about them equally, it’s that they make sense on why they’re created and the narrative behind them. Wether the D. Rex is created by ingen or something else, it just doesn’t add up on why it would came to be. Even if there is a reason (at least a plausible one) there are many dinosaurs and animals that could’ve easily fit into this criteria. Many famous species have yet to enter the silver screen, so it feels unfair that we get another original creature in a franchise known and watch because of dinosaurs. I have other (mostly negative) thoughts on the trailer, but the D. Rex is by far my biggest issue, and I’m really hoping this film will prove me wrong and it’s good.
While mutations do exist in real life what you never do is prolong the life of failed experiments when they’re already useless in the goal of making theme park attractions. Isn’t that the motive in cloning the dinosaurs in the first place?
I think in Regards to Human DNA being used in Hybrids (if it's the Case with this one), it's how far they should go with the Design and no further. They also should leave one like that as a one Time Thing. I'm not completely opposed to Human DNA in other Dinosaurs if they'll still look Dinosaur like enough. I do for Example love the Theory that the Indoraptor had Human DNA
The titanosaurs look awesome. And I think the 3 spinosaurs are 3 different designs since this island has the first attempts at cloning extinct animals.
My luke warmt ake: The raptor, whatever species it might be, would be feathered. That's why they've hidden the rest of the body and only shown the feet. But I'm not sure why that would be suspenseful... considering we've already had the pyroraptor
I think overall it seems to be an improvement over the JW trilogy in every way. For the "failed" monster thing, if they approach it properly I think it'll be an interesting plot point, design aside. Failed experiments are something they havent really explored and I think if they handle it good it'll be cool and not take away from the movie. Most of the new designs I really like, tho I do agree that the spino is a little weird in places and that the new quetz is a downgrade, but I personally dont really mind. New mosa is awesome tho, love it Nice video as always! keep it up
I cant help but theorize that the reason this spinosaurus is on the island with the mutants, is because InGen made an accurate spinosaurus using blood, but they thought it was a mutant, and then made the JP3 spinosaurus with T-rex DNA.
@user-p4y4z they might not have thought that, but a scientifically accurate spinosaurus would not have sat well with visitors in the 90s. It doesn't even sit well with people now, so it's possible that ingen would have purposely created the jw3 spinosaurus as a mix with trex, knowing it'd be cooler
I think everyone is forgetting that these dinosaurs are all experiments and mutations. So they're all gonna be different depending on what animals they've combined and that it's always not gonna end in a successful mutation/result. It's actually about time they show failed mutations or deformed results from these experiments, and I feel pretty confident that the Drex is one of those failed mutations.(as with the dead two-headed velociraptor).
Although I rather the JP III spino, Im just happy to have spinosaurus back. What DOES actually bother me is the plot says they need DNA from the three biggest *dinosaurs*… so why are they going after quetzal??
There’s a fundamental problem with the whole mutant plot. Not because the mutant exists, mind you, but because it was kept alive this whole time. If memory serves me right the whole point of cloning the dinosaurs was to make viable theme park attractions. If that is the case why would the scientists waste a lot of money in raising a mutant that is already a useless asset in that endeavor into a mature adult? It makes absolutely zero sense!
Could’ve grown on it’s own and then was put into cryostasis and gets released during the film. They’ve stated that the dinosaurs are given genes to make them grow up faster and cryostasis is a thing as the Scorpios Rex was put into a cryostasis chamber. Maybe this mutant grew EXTREMELY quick and the scientists put it in stasis. I’m not a huge fan of the mutant either, but I’m willing to give it a chance and see what they come up with.
@@nimrodmcduffey6358 Oh, but you see, you DON’T put it into cryostasis. Simply ending the poor thing is way more humane than prolonging it’s life artificially. What were they hoping to accomplish?! It’s just silly. Neutralizing the failed experiment also spares way more human lives from potential disaster that happens in the movie. This thing should only be a bunch of remains in a glass jar similar to the (hopefully dead) two-headed raptor, not a surviving animal. That prospect is easily the dumbest idea introduced in the franchise so far. “Not a fan.”
Maybe they wanted to keep it alive so they can continue studying it to see how it mutates/changes further? That’s usually how these things go. Also, when has ANYONE behind the scenes of the parks in ANY of these movies made good choices. Also also, if you think that this is the dumbest/worst idea introduced in Jurassic Park/World…you’re either new to this franchise, or you’ve chosen to ignore some of the supplementary material because at least the mutant sticks to the main theme of genetic tampering and the consequences that come with it. That alone makes it belong to this franchise more than the BRAD’s from Camp Cretaceous. And this is coming from someone who LIKES CC. And even I though they were weird as hell and didn’t belong. I’m not saying I’m disagreeing completely. I’m also NOT a fan of the mutant being in the movie, but we also don’t know ANYTHING about it. We can’t accurately say anything until we see the movie.
Let me answer your question with two words: Henry Wu. Henry Wu...the same Henry Wu who had mutated animals in his lab in Jurassic World...the same person who put the Scorpius Rex, a failed hybrid prototype in cryostasis...
@ Another two words: John Hammond. Hammond was definitely aware enough of what was being done within his company as a CEO to have the final say over what was and wasn’t getting through said company. “I’ve been present for the birth of every single animal on this island” and all that jazz. The John that we know in the movies would have absolutely been against keeping creatures like the D.rex alive needlessly. No excuses such as “he had sympathy for this thing”, please, the whole thing is only allowed to happen in the new movie because they are quite frankly out of ideas and wanted to introduce cheap shock value for the sake of cheap shock value, nothing more and nothing less. The problem is that it fundamentally changes what these characters previously stood for. Now silly actions are simply allowed to happen for the sake of plot concenience. And that’s sad. As for the idea of cryostasis itself, just like the BRADs also introduced by Camp, that is way more futuristic technology than this franchise really should have. Previously I had the impression that storing genetic material in a cold storage only applies to things that are either embryonic or just overall not fully alive. Keeping literal adult life forms alive with it takes it kinda far. Yes, even in a franchise where cloning is a thing it’s still way out there. So much for being grounded within scientific plausibility. But it is what it is and this sillyness is what we will now receive. Time to brace for impact, I guess. 🤦♂
it would be cool to do a movie franchise with more modern interpretations of dinosaurs with much more plausible designs rather than the fantasy-esq designs they keep making. I am especially not a fan of the hybrids in general, indominus I really liked as a one off thing and indoraptor I am not a huge fan of conceptually even though I think the figure of it seems really cool and I'd like to own one.
i dont get why everybody just assumes that the raptor paws we see belong to the (potentionally 2 headed) raptor from the incubation chamber. personally, i think there arent any velociraptors in this movie at all, i think theyre the feathered accurate Utahraptors from the toyleaks and thats why theyre hiding it
Things I didn’t like about the trailer: 1. Terrible new Quetz design. (It doesn’t even look like a Quetzalcoatlus at all anymore, it looks more like a Hatzegopteryx or something.) 2. Titanosaurus. (Why choose a dubious genus instead of something like argentinosaurus?) 3. The Spinosaurs short necks and ugly faces resembling the JW baryonx. 4. The fact that they refer to the Quetz and Mosa as dinosaurs. 5. “Please don’t say theres raptors.” “Theres raptors.” 6. D.rex……. What a disgusting horrendous creature!!! I thought we were done with hybrids!!! Why does it have six limbs!!! What kind of a stupid name is D.rex!!! I disliked hybrids in the franchise already but this one is something else…. Worst decision ever to put something like this in the movie….. Things I liked about the trailer: 1. New gorgeous Mosasaurus design. 2. New Decent Spinosaurus design. 3. Environments and scenery. Also im a bit disappointed that there’s no oral tissue for the Rex but that’s not really a negetive. Overall very disappointed….
I'm fully with you on this one. It's straying way too far from actual dinosaurs, or even dinosaur hybrids. It's starting to become a straight up alien/kaiju franchise.
The trailer looks good mostly, but I’m still cautiously optimistic My biggest concern is that mutant monster thing. I want to see dinosaurs 🦕 🦖, not monsters 👹 which is what it looks like we are getting. (Yeah you could argue that the Indominus Rex, Indoraptor, and the other hybrids are pretty much monsters, but at least they still look and sound like dinosaurs. Not this! This is a straight up monster and looks like something from the monster-verse, not Jurassic Park. Plus I'm kinda sick of the hybrid/mutant trend now.) I don't want the movie/franchise to just jump the shark (again!/like Dominion) I want the movie to be good and feel like Jurassic Park, not Fast and Furious like the last 2 movies.
Was wondering,at the end of the movie,when the final fight will be,drex will be fighting that new green trex(likely) and a spino,but there are 3 spinos,and we need one specific individual to be a hero dino,so maybe theres a chance that jp spino returns?
I agree. I'm cautiously optimistic, but I'm worried, too. I love JP, but I'm not at all a fan of what the World era has turned into. It feels like they're backing off and doubling down on that stuff at the same time lol. We'll see!
the mutant is a failed trex clone which im happy to see. The titanosaur sails are based off of the godzilla monster with the same name. and yeah the mutant a small sauropod sized predator. And all the dinos are supposed to be imperfect on purpose.
The mutant thing looks like inbred of Rancor and Rakghoul from Star Wars. Spino has all the mistakes of the Fallen Kingdom Baryonyx and more. Its head looks strange, its neck is short, and the distinctive features of a spinosaurid member are a thin neck and a thin snout. But this design lacks them all. I think because the fans were very obsessed with the shrinkwrapping thing in the designs they used to make, this time they said let's do the opposite and make them extra fatter and don't make them crocodile like, lets make them look like giant scaly komodo dragons. And that's why spino's neck is like this. Rex is a bit more like the designs in the arts of the novel and the scene is reminiscent of him, so it's not bad. As paleo fans, we don't like Dilophosaurus, again, I guess it's become a common belief. And if that pterasaur is Quetzalcoatlus, they deserve all the swears and bad words that will come to them. Why do they even need to change the Dominion design? Some Jurassic folks going to say that "They were biosyn clones, this one is ingen clone" and imma say "Dude why". I'm sorry, I'm a big Jurassic fan, but we're going to see a movie that will break the Jurassic park continuum, where dinosaurs will be treated as stupid creatures (I got that vibe from the trex river scene) and the lead role is a ridiculous future predator. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a hater, but the only thing that stands out in the trailer is the mosasaurus and the new rex.
Please do a episode on tapejarids, Many people have a misconception of thalassodromeus as a skimmer, even worde after path of titans released a semi aquatic version of the animal, much love
Here are some of my thoughts about the trailer: • im very confused about the genus of titanosaurus as a whole, i thought they were more like a family of sauropods than an actual genus. • the titanosaurus looks very much like dicraeosauridae with a very diplodocidae tail. • the quetzalcoatlus looks very much like a jurassic stylised hatzegopteryx, shouldve kept the dominion design. • wasnt sorna the research facility of the original jurassic park? • the mutant dinosaur makes sense to me because i dont see them do it perfect on the first try. • the design of the mutant rex is kinda disappointing as to me, it doesnt look like a failed dinosaur just a straight up monster. • i like that the spinosaurus looks more paleo accurate but this design is not it for me, they couldve used a similiar design as the la brea spinosaurus as it is also more paleo accurate to the jp3 spinosaurus but still maintains the iconic colors. • the mosasaurus looks much better than its previous counter part, not the biggest fan of the colors but thats an just personal opinion. • i very much hope we will finally see an adult dilophosaurus. Also, your cat looks really cute what's its name?
Although I am not very keen on the designs, except the rex and mosasaur, I only wish that the movie is good at this point. I've accepted the fact that the JW IP is leaning more to the monster movie popcorn movie side of things ever since Jurassic World
I liked the trailer tbh, I think they’re just really going with the premise of “This island has has the rejects/failed specimens that were too expensive to just put down so here they are just going on about their lives on this island” Or something like that idk 🤷♂️, I’m excited to see what they do with it ngl
I read that some of the dinosaurs are going to have individual variations, and that includes the spinosaurus. So the one shown in the trailer seems to be a little bit overweight compared to the others lol.
I dont know about the spino design it just feels a bit down. I wa s hoping for like an jp3 spino design but a bit more stylish. But of course we have a spino so thats great!
New spino looks amazing for mainstream media ngl. So glad to see a (partially? fully?) quadrupedal spinosaurus in the franchise, and I'm beyond happy they didn't keep the JP3 design. As for the mutant, I think they've oversaturated the hell outta that whole aspect already, though I think it could be done very well, as they said they want this movie to be reminiscent and give the same fear as the lost world, which is great. The "quetzal" I'm going to believe is a hatzegopteryx. They already had a quetzal and the design here is both quite distinct, and significantly bulkier in the beak. Rexy looks great (are those lips or is hope deceiving me?), and the mosasaur looks much more realistic than previous films, both in looks and size. I'm glad it's a new crew, and they aren't milking the last crews, even if I enjoyed them. I hope to see a titanoboa or a prehistoric gator/croc in this movie, I've been wanting to see those for a while. All around, I'm excited and I'm hopeful.
From what I understand, a lot of the dinos are basically mutants because they were experiments. I guess the next trailer may tell us more. But I think I’ve seen a few people mention that there’s been some changes in snout shapes and other stuff and I’d assume that may be the Dino advisor’s doing?
What makes me excited about this mutant dinosaur/hybrid is that it looks like they’re leaning into the amphibian DNA aspect. I put it like this on Reddit, but I think it’s more of a 50-50 split between amphibian and dinosaur, resulting in something like an axolotl T-Rex. That explains the extra limbs, and the kind of fetal design. I get being burnt out of the hybrids, but I think this is an instance where it will actually play back into the law of how they screwed up the cloning process in a pretty interesting way.
From the way it looks in the trailer the t-rex looks like its based more on the animatronic from the original trilogy which i love. Really thought the Jurassic worlds t-rex's muzzle was a little to boxy and a little too wide
I’m overall liking what I’m seeing so far. The spino head is a bit of a letdown, and I’m not that big of a fan of the mutant, but hopefully they’ll surprise me and make it work.
Im actually accepting of the mutant, cause I think it makes more sense than hybrids It's something that is actually different, though I am definitely shocked with how huge it is
I still bet though there's some Human DNA in there. Not only because a Leak mentioned that a dark Secret will be discovered but also due to anatomical Features like the Head Shape
I’m sorry guys but I’m not feeling it with this one, just looks like another generic, badly acted action movie with Dinosaurs in it. I hate to say it, but I’m probably gonna pass on this one. Honestly, I’d rather we get more Dino Documentaries like Walking with Dinosaurs & Prehistoric Planet, than another Jurassic World movie. The Jurassic Park Franchise needs to rest.
The titanosaurus design is based off the titanosaurus of the Godzilla series toho cuz the director for this movie we know is a huge Godzilla fan he directed Godzilla 2014
The D-Rex is simple a failed dinosaur clone that came out misshapen and deformed, jsut more extreme compared to that of scorpios, though scorpios was a made up dinosaur while this is simply a existing animal that came out wrong. And quetza is simply a different clone :/
A mutant that was raised into adulthood by the scientists for inexplicable reasons that has nothing to do with making viable theme park attractions. In that context it sounds super silly.
This trailer makes me feel like it will be unconnected to any or the other jp and jw project, even tho i think it’s connected… Also did we ask for a mutant?
Spino design isnt great at all ngl, and why are they chilling with mosa's.....and good lord can we please stop fuckin with hybrids. We already have a monsterverse
I think the reason a lot of the dinosaurs look different in this movie, is because they were probably Ingen's first ever attempt at cloning extinct animals
Adding to that, the dinosaurs are probably suffering from inbreeding, due to the fact they probably had small populations before they started reproducing + they live in an island, so, because of that, they probably get weird mutations that make them look even weirder than before
Most likely! But that doesn’t necessarily mean we have to like the design choices
@@DinoGuy8 Yeah i honestly have the same opinion as yours
i hope they give us a good explanation to why the dinos look so weird
Someone brought up how the Quetzelcoatlus in this movie is most likely an InGen clone. Where as the one in Dominion was a Biosyn clone. I actually feel that makes more sense as in Dominion, they explain that their clones are pure and real. Whereas InGen’s clones all have other DNA within them. Of course they look different. The one in Rebirth is a genetic mishmash, and the one in Dominion is a true Quetz.
True quetz isn’t a true quetz tho ☠️
Makes sense,other then the size,biosyn quetz is quite accurate,and the rebirth one looks very unique and Kinda mysterious because of its head crest
" pure and real"...
Giganotosaurus ☠
@@micheld7994 ah yes
@@nimrodmcduffey6358 im thinking it’s a hatzegopteryx due to its proportions
Titanosaurus design and color scheme is based on the Kaiju Titanosaurus from the early Godzilla films. It’s cool that Gareth Edwards (director of Godzilla 2014) is still showing love to the franchise.
Another “Jurassic” TH-camr made more or less the same observation, actually.
they did spinosaurus head shape dirty ngl😂
Shi looks ugly ashl, crocodilsaurus not a spino
Why are you black?!?!
Nuh-uh
Fr doesn't even have the head crest anymore
@@luciusfucius I like the design of the new spino
I like the design of the dinos and the other prehistoric reptiles, I am optimistic about the mutant dinosaur which is somewhat like real-life science that when making a new creature there are going to be failed experiments
The mutant existing can make sense. The scientists who made it raising it into a mature adult when it is already a failed experiment useless as a theme park attraction is just silly.
Are we sure that spino isn't a mosa-spino hybrid? That head and neck are atrocities 😆
Might have been why they were left there as well as having the tail paddle and short legs and since that didn’t align with the public’s perception of spinosaurus in the late 80/early 90s they didn’t use it they talk about stuff like that in the first book
Camera angle
Genetically engineered Theme Park Monsters
@@Firestar-TV I’m hoping Jonathan Bailey’s character critiques them and points out there problems
🤦♂️
I’d do love the new Mosasaurus and the spinosaurus still looks amazing even if not fully accurate, still a major awesome look that looks like the irl animal
The spino head ruins it
What i understood from this trailer is that this new island seems to be the first actual research facility, when the scientists didn't fully know how to clone extinct animals yet.
So, i guess that when they managed to clone their first dinosaurs, they were very different from the ones we saw in the JP movie, and that's probably why they look weird, specially that mutant abomination thing
plus there's also the chance of the dinosaurs suffering from inbreeding, since (i think) this island is smaller than the other ones, which means it can't accomodate a large enough population of each dinosaur species
@ mhm, I do think some of these have different context, it’s definitely true that the hybrid was not planned like that💀definitely inbred in some way
@@Jurassicgalaxy1245 Nah just like baryonix
I was skeptical of the mutant dino, but it really grew on me. He’s a freak and I love it.
Would you say it's freakier than the offspring in Alien Romolus?
Because rebirth seems to be using the mutant for the 3rd act of the movie like Romolus did with offspring.
@@legendary5733 I would say it’s freakier, but maybe just because it was just revealed. Alien has been going on for ages with the movies constantly getting weird designs. Jurassic World, while having hybrids, has never done anything like this, so it definitely hits hard.
@ThatFunnyTortoise
I did heard they are more than just one mutant in this movie based on the leaks.
One is meant to be something like with multiple arms.
While the other is more xenomorph design. But I could be wrong, personally for me I like mutant creature since I'm sucker for something grotesque abomination designs.
And also Offspring in Romolus was creepy but I am one of the minorities that likes the Newborn from Alien resurrection.
This mutant is like a mixture of both that I like about it.
@@legendary5733 There’s more?! I’m anticipating that raptor to break out(thus it being hidden), but I really don’t need more mutants.
The Vanity Fair article describes the mutant as like a mashup of Star Wars Rancor, Alien xenomorph, and a T. rex.
As far as why as some of the designs have aspects that look off (the Titanosaurus sails, and whip like tail, the Quetzalcoatlus crest, the croc like head of the Spinosaurus), but are largely up to date (Titanosaurus proportions, tail aside, the Quetzalcoatlus with the feathers, the Spinosaurus with the large rounded sail, and what seems to be the big paddle tail too) the Vanity Fair article also has an explanation:
“These are the dinosaurs that didn’t work. There’s some mutations in there,” Marshall says. “They’re all based on real dinosaur research, but they look a little different.”
I think it isn't far off from the original Jurassic Park's design direction. They were mostly up to date for the times in their anatomy, which the exception of the artistic license used (Dilophosaurus frill and being undersized/juvenile, the raptor being oversized, Brachiosaurus chewing like a cow, etc). Or even the original novel with the version numbers.
Also folks have surely mentioned this, but I have no doubts the sails on the Titanosaurus is a fun callback to the Godzilla Kaiju Titanosaurus which also has orange sails on it. Edwards also directed a Godzilla film after all.
The Mattel toy listings that were revealed early by accident from a certain website (starts with an E) does confirm a Utahraptor is coming. Who knows if it's just them doing their own thing, or if it will be in the film yet. That said the JWE2 design is absolute peak, so anything lesser will possibly disappoint (unless it looks like the classic Kenner toy. I would be fine with that too).
Wait! Jurassic World Evolution 2 has Utahraptor? Amazing. Didn't play for that long yet, so I didn't know.
Is it in some DLC?
@@Firestar-TV Yep, it's included in the Cretaceous Predators DLC which also included Concavenator, Gigantoraptor, and the Camp Cretaceous Tarbosaurus. It was the third to last DLC to release, back in Dec 23 if I recall.
@@Faelrin oh, don't have that one yet. Maybe I'll buy it when my financial Situation finally improves again
Nah the spino turned into a literal crocodile with a robust short neck and wide crocodilian mouth instead of the stork-like fish trappers JP3 had, it ended up being a sailed pliosaur at this point. They massacred spino so bad lol
hi! at some point i will become a patron because I have been watching your videos for about a year, because no one but you understands how awesome dinosaurs are and how much I love them. my favorite dinosaur is Maip Macrothorax, and while you cant really do a many interpretations of video on maip, I would love to see a many interpretations of megaraptors! thanks!
6:00 I have a guess: It’s a two headed raptor, just like the one shown earlier in this trailer. That’s why they’re hiding it.
Don't think it's two headed. I think the Utahraptor Theory makes more Sense, especially since there are not only failed Experiments but also Species that were thought to be too dangerous for the Park
id hate that idea. one fucked up mutant is enough. instead I think theyre the feathered Utahraptors
@@Nasuto1702 since they're old InGen Clones I think they would have Quills at most
I would love for Utah raptor to finally make a appearance, and accurate spino!
that big thing is a mutant from the original lore of the books. they had planned to add it in the first jurassic park film, but due to some problems, they couldn't. very happy to see it there. it's kind of like the canonical wolverine costume in the latest film
Again with the weird monster when there are so many unique carnivores from millions of years to choose from I’m getting tired of this
Bro is trying to fool himself. The spinos head IS BAD lol.
Even if the D-Rex is a quote on quote “Mutant” it doesn’t rly change the fact it looks like a alien 😭 when I think of a Mutant dinosaur I think of a Trex with jagged teeth with thick extra Osteoderms, quills and maybe two extra arms but ya that thing looks straight out of the Alien movies 😭 I’m still excited for the movie though, who knows it may change my mind on the design but so far I don’t like it but if you do that’s ok, all opinions are valid.
It looks more like gojira's long lost cousin than a t-rex mutant tbf
Love all the new designs honestly
late last year a toy site posted listings early ( they got taken down withing 48 hours ) and one of them was a electronic utahraptor, so when i saw those beefier looking feet i had the same thought.
The Doomsday rex or D-Rex looks like one of the demons as featured in the Doom games to be honest
The just released JWR Spinosaurus render makes the Spino look much better!
According to people that were involved in the leaks of the movie,those renders on the merch are old designs for the spino.
Not necessarily. It bears a resemblance to a dimetrodon, albeit larger. The only notable designs are the mosa, Rex, and the sail and tail of the spinossaurus. However, the head, neck, and the quetz resembles the dragons from Avatar.
My problem with the D. Rex is why another monster? Jurassic as a franchise Is known for having dinosaurs and having another hybrid thing for the forth time is getting to much. I have mix thoughts with all three previous hybrids, but I’d there’s one thing I like about them equally, it’s that they make sense on why they’re created and the narrative behind them. Wether the D. Rex is created by ingen or something else, it just doesn’t add up on why it would came to be. Even if there is a reason (at least a plausible one) there are many dinosaurs and animals that could’ve easily fit into this criteria. Many famous species have yet to enter the silver screen, so it feels unfair that we get another original creature in a franchise known and watch because of dinosaurs. I have other (mostly negative) thoughts on the trailer, but the D. Rex is by far my biggest issue, and I’m really hoping this film will prove me wrong and it’s good.
That D rex looks to me like the unholy child of a gorilla and a star wars rancor that was born during the reaktor meltdown in chernobyl
This film has alot of positives, but the mutant dino is low key giving me JP 4 vibes, and not good vibes.
While mutations do exist in real life what you never do is prolong the life of failed experiments when they’re already useless in the goal of making theme park attractions. Isn’t that the motive in cloning the dinosaurs in the first place?
@@DinoslayThat makes perfect sense to me.
It depends on each person, because in my case, I love the vibe of Jurassic Park 4 despite it being out of line.
I think in Regards to Human DNA being used in Hybrids (if it's the Case with this one), it's how far they should go with the Design and no further. They also should leave one like that as a one Time Thing.
I'm not completely opposed to Human DNA in other Dinosaurs if they'll still look Dinosaur like enough.
I do for Example love the Theory that the Indoraptor had Human DNA
The titanosaurs look awesome. And I think the 3 spinosaurs are 3 different designs since this island has the first attempts at cloning extinct animals.
My luke warmt ake: The raptor, whatever species it might be, would be feathered. That's why they've hidden the rest of the body and only shown the feet. But I'm not sure why that would be suspenseful... considering we've already had the pyroraptor
I think overall it seems to be an improvement over the JW trilogy in every way. For the "failed" monster thing, if they approach it properly I think it'll be an interesting plot point, design aside. Failed experiments are something they havent really explored and I think if they handle it good it'll be cool and not take away from the movie. Most of the new designs I really like, tho I do agree that the spino is a little weird in places and that the new quetz is a downgrade, but I personally dont really mind. New mosa is awesome tho, love it
Nice video as always! keep it up
6:30 love the cat
I cant help but theorize that the reason this spinosaurus is on the island with the mutants, is because InGen made an accurate spinosaurus using blood, but they thought it was a mutant, and then made the JP3 spinosaurus with T-rex DNA.
That sounds silly. Ingen cloning an accurate creature but thinking it's a mutant? What a way to insult an animal 😆
@user-p4y4z they might not have thought that, but a scientifically accurate spinosaurus would not have sat well with visitors in the 90s. It doesn't even sit well with people now, so it's possible that ingen would have purposely created the jw3 spinosaurus as a mix with trex, knowing it'd be cooler
Been waiting all day for this! Was very excited to see how you felt about it!
Had been waiting all day for your reaction 😄
I think everyone is forgetting that these dinosaurs are all experiments and mutations. So they're all gonna be different depending on what animals they've combined and that it's always not gonna end in a successful mutation/result. It's actually about time they show failed mutations or deformed results from these experiments, and I feel pretty confident that the Drex is one of those failed mutations.(as with the dead two-headed velociraptor).
Hope the raptors in this have feathers.
been waiting for this all day
Can’t wait to watch this film
Although I rather the JP III spino, Im just happy to have spinosaurus back. What DOES actually bother me is the plot says they need DNA from the three biggest *dinosaurs*… so why are they going after quetzal??
they mean they have to get the biggest land dinosaur
The biggest thing in the sea
And the biggest thing in the air
@@Jurassicgalaxy1245so they are gonna stead adn of 3 land dinosaurs and 3 flying reptiles i don't get it
Probably just using the word "Dinosaur" as an umbrella term
There’s a fundamental problem with the whole mutant plot. Not because the mutant exists, mind you, but because it was kept alive this whole time. If memory serves me right the whole point of cloning the dinosaurs was to make viable theme park attractions. If that is the case why would the scientists waste a lot of money in raising a mutant that is already a useless asset in that endeavor into a mature adult? It makes absolutely zero sense!
Could’ve grown on it’s own and then was put into cryostasis and gets released during the film. They’ve stated that the dinosaurs are given genes to make them grow up faster and cryostasis is a thing as the Scorpios Rex was put into a cryostasis chamber. Maybe this mutant grew EXTREMELY quick and the scientists put it in stasis. I’m not a huge fan of the mutant either, but I’m willing to give it a chance and see what they come up with.
@@nimrodmcduffey6358 Oh, but you see, you DON’T put it into cryostasis. Simply ending the poor thing is way more humane than prolonging it’s life artificially. What were they hoping to accomplish?! It’s just silly. Neutralizing the failed experiment also spares way more human lives from potential disaster that happens in the movie. This thing should only be a bunch of remains in a glass jar similar to the (hopefully dead) two-headed raptor, not a surviving animal. That prospect is easily the dumbest idea introduced in the franchise so far. “Not a fan.”
Maybe they wanted to keep it alive so they can continue studying it to see how it mutates/changes further? That’s usually how these things go.
Also, when has ANYONE behind the scenes of the parks in ANY of these movies made good choices.
Also also, if you think that this is the dumbest/worst idea introduced in Jurassic Park/World…you’re either new to this franchise, or you’ve chosen to ignore some of the supplementary material because at least the mutant sticks to the main theme of genetic tampering and the consequences that come with it. That alone makes it belong to this franchise more than the BRAD’s from Camp Cretaceous. And this is coming from someone who LIKES CC. And even I though they were weird as hell and didn’t belong.
I’m not saying I’m disagreeing completely. I’m also NOT a fan of the mutant being in the movie, but we also don’t know ANYTHING about it. We can’t accurately say anything until we see the movie.
Let me answer your question with two words: Henry Wu.
Henry Wu...the same Henry Wu who had mutated animals in his lab in Jurassic World...the same person who put the Scorpius Rex, a failed hybrid prototype in cryostasis...
@ Another two words: John Hammond.
Hammond was definitely aware enough of what was being done within his company as a CEO to have the final say over what was and wasn’t getting through said company. “I’ve been present for the birth of every single animal on this island” and all that jazz. The John that we know in the movies would have absolutely been against keeping creatures like the D.rex alive needlessly. No excuses such as “he had sympathy for this thing”, please, the whole thing is only allowed to happen in the new movie because they are quite frankly out of ideas and wanted to introduce cheap shock value for the sake of cheap shock value, nothing more and nothing less. The problem is that it fundamentally changes what these characters previously stood for. Now silly actions are simply allowed to happen for the sake of plot concenience. And that’s sad.
As for the idea of cryostasis itself, just like the BRADs also introduced by Camp, that is way more futuristic technology than this franchise really should have. Previously I had the impression that storing genetic material in a cold storage only applies to things that are either embryonic or just overall not fully alive. Keeping literal adult life forms alive with it takes it kinda far. Yes, even in a franchise where cloning is a thing it’s still way out there. So much for being grounded within scientific plausibility.
But it is what it is and this sillyness is what we will now receive. Time to brace for impact, I guess. 🤦♂
I for one am gonna reserve judgment on the *mutant* until I see the whole film from beginning to end.
it would be cool to do a movie franchise with more modern interpretations of dinosaurs with much more plausible designs rather than the fantasy-esq designs they keep making. I am especially not a fan of the hybrids in general, indominus I really liked as a one off thing and indoraptor I am not a huge fan of conceptually even though I think the figure of it seems really cool and I'd like to own one.
i dont get why everybody just assumes that the raptor paws we see belong to the (potentionally 2 headed) raptor from the incubation chamber.
personally, i think there arent any velociraptors in this movie at all, i think theyre the feathered accurate Utahraptors from the toyleaks and thats why theyre hiding it
Things I didn’t like about the trailer:
1. Terrible new Quetz design. (It doesn’t even look like a Quetzalcoatlus at all anymore, it looks more like a Hatzegopteryx or something.)
2. Titanosaurus. (Why choose a dubious genus instead of something like argentinosaurus?)
3. The Spinosaurs short necks and ugly faces resembling the JW baryonx.
4. The fact that they refer to the Quetz and Mosa as dinosaurs.
5. “Please don’t say theres raptors.” “Theres raptors.”
6. D.rex……. What a disgusting horrendous creature!!! I thought we were done with hybrids!!! Why does it have six limbs!!! What kind of a stupid name is D.rex!!! I disliked hybrids in the franchise already but this one is something else…. Worst decision ever to put something like this in the movie…..
Things I liked about the trailer:
1. New gorgeous Mosasaurus design.
2. New Decent Spinosaurus design.
3. Environments and scenery.
Also im a bit disappointed that there’s no oral tissue for the Rex but that’s not really a negetive.
Overall very disappointed….
I'm fully with you on this one. It's straying way too far from actual dinosaurs, or even dinosaur hybrids. It's starting to become a straight up alien/kaiju franchise.
The trailer looks good mostly, but I’m still cautiously optimistic
My biggest concern is that mutant monster thing. I want to see dinosaurs 🦕 🦖, not monsters 👹 which is what it looks like we are getting.
(Yeah you could argue that the Indominus Rex, Indoraptor, and the other hybrids are pretty much monsters, but at least they still look and sound like dinosaurs. Not this! This is a straight up monster and looks like something from the monster-verse, not Jurassic Park. Plus I'm kinda sick of the hybrid/mutant trend now.)
I don't want the movie/franchise to just jump the shark (again!/like Dominion)
I want the movie to be good and feel like Jurassic Park, not Fast and Furious like the last 2 movies.
Well. Most Jurassic World organizers and producers want monsters in Dinosaurs because it's cooler in their PoV
I Hope The Movie Is Going To Be Good! I Was Looking Forward To See It Though
3:14 Raptor with 2 heads
Was wondering,at the end of the movie,when the final fight will be,drex will be fighting that new green trex(likely) and a spino,but there are 3 spinos,and we need one specific individual to be a hero dino,so maybe theres a chance that jp spino returns?
I prefer Spinosaurus from JP3.But,i still would to see it in theater.Because i love dinosaurs.
I love ur videos dino guy keep up the good work
I agree. I'm cautiously optimistic, but I'm worried, too. I love JP, but I'm not at all a fan of what the World era has turned into. It feels like they're backing off and doubling down on that stuff at the same time lol. We'll see!
the mutant is a failed trex clone which im happy to see. The titanosaur sails are based off of the godzilla monster with the same name. and yeah the mutant a small sauropod sized predator. And all the dinos are supposed to be imperfect on purpose.
The mutant thing looks like inbred of Rancor and Rakghoul from Star Wars. Spino has all the mistakes of the Fallen Kingdom Baryonyx and more. Its head looks strange, its neck is short, and the distinctive features of a spinosaurid member are a thin neck and a thin snout. But this design lacks them all. I think because the fans were very obsessed with the shrinkwrapping thing in the designs they used to make, this time they said let's do the opposite and make them extra fatter and don't make them crocodile like, lets make them look like giant scaly komodo dragons. And that's why spino's neck is like this. Rex is a bit more like the designs in the arts of the novel and the scene is reminiscent of him, so it's not bad. As paleo fans, we don't like Dilophosaurus, again, I guess it's become a common belief. And if that pterasaur is Quetzalcoatlus, they deserve all the swears and bad words that will come to them. Why do they even need to change the Dominion design? Some Jurassic folks going to say that "They were biosyn clones, this one is ingen clone" and imma say "Dude why". I'm sorry, I'm a big Jurassic fan, but we're going to see a movie that will break the Jurassic park continuum, where dinosaurs will be treated as stupid creatures (I got that vibe from the trex river scene) and the lead role is a ridiculous future predator. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a hater, but the only thing that stands out in the trailer is the mosasaurus and the new rex.
This is the reaction i wanted to see the most
The facilities are very futuristic
Spino looks like a 1890 reconstrution for me😂
Please do a episode on tapejarids,
Many people have a misconception of thalassodromeus as a skimmer, even worde after path of titans released a semi aquatic version of the animal, much love
Here are some of my thoughts about the trailer:
• im very confused about the genus of titanosaurus as a whole, i thought they were more like a family of sauropods than an actual genus.
• the titanosaurus looks very much like dicraeosauridae with a very diplodocidae tail.
• the quetzalcoatlus looks very much like a jurassic stylised hatzegopteryx, shouldve kept the dominion design.
• wasnt sorna the research facility of the original jurassic park?
• the mutant dinosaur makes sense to me because i dont see them do it perfect on the first try.
• the design of the mutant rex is kinda disappointing as to me, it doesnt look like a failed dinosaur just a straight up monster.
• i like that the spinosaurus looks more paleo accurate but this design is not it for me, they couldve used a similiar design as the la brea spinosaurus as it is also more paleo accurate to the jp3 spinosaurus but still maintains the iconic colors.
• the mosasaurus looks much better than its previous counter part, not the biggest fan of the colors but thats an just personal opinion.
• i very much hope we will finally see an adult dilophosaurus.
Also, your cat looks really cute what's its name?
Although I am not very keen on the designs, except the rex and mosasaur, I only wish that the movie is good at this point. I've accepted the fact that the JW IP is leaning more to the monster movie popcorn movie side of things ever since Jurassic World
As long as t-rex is in it that's all that counts the water raft scene
I liked the trailer tbh, I think they’re just really going with the premise of “This island has has the rejects/failed specimens that were too expensive to just put down so here they are just going on about their lives on this island”
Or something like that idk 🤷♂️, I’m excited to see what they do with it ngl
I read that some of the dinosaurs are going to have individual variations, and that includes the spinosaurus. So the one shown in the trailer seems to be a little bit overweight compared to the others lol.
I dont know about the spino design it just feels a bit down. I wa s hoping for like an jp3 spino design but a bit more stylish. But of course we have a spino so thats great!
New spino looks amazing for mainstream media ngl. So glad to see a (partially? fully?) quadrupedal spinosaurus in the franchise, and I'm beyond happy they didn't keep the JP3 design. As for the mutant, I think they've oversaturated the hell outta that whole aspect already, though I think it could be done very well, as they said they want this movie to be reminiscent and give the same fear as the lost world, which is great. The "quetzal" I'm going to believe is a hatzegopteryx. They already had a quetzal and the design here is both quite distinct, and significantly bulkier in the beak. Rexy looks great (are those lips or is hope deceiving me?), and the mosasaur looks much more realistic than previous films, both in looks and size. I'm glad it's a new crew, and they aren't milking the last crews, even if I enjoyed them. I hope to see a titanoboa or a prehistoric gator/croc in this movie, I've been wanting to see those for a while. All around, I'm excited and I'm hopeful.
From what I understand, a lot of the dinos are basically mutants because they were experiments. I guess the next trailer may tell us more.
But I think I’ve seen a few people mention that there’s been some changes in snout shapes and other stuff and I’d assume that may be the Dino advisor’s doing?
This is exactly what I was hoping for after Dominion cs I didnt like dominion at all and this this is a masterpiece
What makes me excited about this mutant dinosaur/hybrid is that it looks like they’re leaning into the amphibian DNA aspect. I put it like this on Reddit, but I think it’s more of a 50-50 split between amphibian and dinosaur, resulting in something like an axolotl T-Rex. That explains the extra limbs, and the kind of fetal design. I get being burnt out of the hybrids, but I think this is an instance where it will actually play back into the law of how they screwed up the cloning process in a pretty interesting way.
Cant wait for the movie and its released on my birthday month!
What are those?? Um my sandels😂
From the way it looks in the trailer the t-rex looks like its based more on the animatronic from the original trilogy which i love. Really thought the Jurassic worlds t-rex's muzzle was a little to boxy and a little too wide
What type of cameras do you have to record yourself and your screen? Im trying to do this stuff too but idk where to start
I would increase the arms size and making it more robust and neck but still maintaining the thickness and modify the skull
And also about the raptor is a new velociraptor
I’m overall liking what I’m seeing so far.
The spino head is a bit of a letdown, and I’m not that big of a fan of the mutant, but hopefully they’ll surprise me and make it work.
I kinda wish Jurassic franchise should add Megaraptor or Maip Macrothorax
Possibly an unpopular opinion, I really like the mutant dinosaur
That is completely fair!
Im actually accepting of the mutant, cause I think it makes more sense than hybrids
It's something that is actually different, though I am definitely shocked with how huge it is
I still bet though there's some Human DNA in there.
Not only because a Leak mentioned that a dark Secret will be discovered but also due to anatomical Features like the Head Shape
The problem is people are deluding themselvea into calling these mutants better designs than previous movies.
Your cat is so cute!
well that’s one way to pronounce Kaiju
Yeah I don’t know what happened there
I’m sorry guys but I’m not feeling it with this one, just looks like another generic, badly acted action movie with Dinosaurs in it. I hate to say it, but I’m probably gonna pass on this one. Honestly, I’d rather we get more Dino Documentaries like Walking with Dinosaurs & Prehistoric Planet, than another Jurassic World movie. The Jurassic Park Franchise needs to rest.
Its just fiction, relax and enjoy❤
The titanosaurus design is based off the titanosaurus of the Godzilla series toho cuz the director for this movie we know is a huge Godzilla fan he directed Godzilla 2014
Hi kitty! ❤
Im so excited!
Whenever a new show or movie comes out, I don't watch unless the normies, the real critics give it the green.
I don’t like those Spinokomododragons, and the mutant of course. Others, fine.
We waited for Spino to Return, and now they made him DIRTY, what is that head neck ?!?! Wtf if it's gonna crawl on 4, I SWEAR
The D-Rex is simple a failed dinosaur clone that came out misshapen and deformed, jsut more extreme compared to that of scorpios, though scorpios was a made up dinosaur while this is simply a existing animal that came out wrong.
And quetza is simply a different clone :/
I get that, still not a fan overall.
I keep feeling something off about this video until i realize what is that "something". Why are you naked? Where is your Hat?
I think the titanasaur having a fin is a nod to the Kaiju, since Gareth Edwards is involved
I hope fans will come to love the Mutant. I mean that happen to me with the Scorpius Rex.
It could be an Azhdarcho.
I’m okay with the mutant dinosaurs and hybrids because I love horror monsters
6:18 cat jumpscare
The Raptor in the Tank was 2 headed so the d rex may just be a mutant
A mutant that was raised into adulthood by the scientists for inexplicable reasons that has nothing to do with making viable theme park attractions. In that context it sounds super silly.
That Drex is a mutated dinosaur
This trailer makes me feel like it will be unconnected to any or the other jp and jw project, even tho i think it’s connected…
Also did we ask for a mutant?
I actually hate the spino design, though I do think the neck could be a little bit longer
I've said on other videos but I can't emphysis it enough: I don't think they had to include a mutant dinosaur.
I just can't help but wonder why they used the fk baryonyx head for spino. It was such a horrendous design.
Spino design isnt great at all ngl, and why are they chilling with mosa's.....and good lord can we please stop fuckin with hybrids. We already have a monsterverse
The spinos neck is so thick and is just an oerweight baryonyx and the rancor ... just why?
the old quetz and spino design where better