'Unlikely' that object in new UAP video is camera smudge: Expert | Vargas Reports
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ม.ค. 2024
- New footage of a purported UAP, or unidentified aerial phenomena, shows something that resembles a jellyfish flying in the sky, its tentacles dangling in the air. Dr. Matthew Szydagis, a professor of physics at the University of Albany and an expert on UFO research, joins "Elizabeth Vargas Reports" to discuss the "strange" object, which he said resembles a droid from Star Wars. He said it's "unlikely" that it's just a camera smudge as some have speculated online.
#UFO #UAP #space #jellyfish
Anchor Elizabeth Vargas delivers the biggest stories, without bias or opinion. Watch "Elizabeth Vargas Reports" every weeknight at 6p/5C on NewsNation. #VargasReports
NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
More from NewsNation: www.newsnationnow.com/
Get our app: trib.al/TBXgYpp
Find us on cable: trib.al/YDOpGyG
How to watch on TV or streaming: trib.al/Vu0Ikij
The location of it on the screen remains the same until the camera moves and then it moves at the same rate. My guess it's a squashed bug on a piece of glass that is protecting the moving camera inside. Also it's brightness only changes when the background brightness is changed but a higher amount, indicating it's closer to the lens.
Exactly! How come nobody sees it tho? It's obviously just a smudge....
Immediately what I saw when this came out and I can’t unsee it. This video doesn’t take that possibility seriously 😒
This was only on the infered, everything else was invisible. So that's why this is weird because if only the infered camera picked up meaning a heat source, invisibility technology. It's not a bug it literally technology they don't know we have.
I think the reason the two people on the ground didn't see this object overhead, is because this footage was taken at night time by a infrared camera.
It’s been reported that it was shot in the day
Or it was birdshit on the lens
@@crackerdan8010 it moves in location on the screen and gets smaller and larger.
Yep when center square focal part of the lens stops the object kept moving.
They didn't see it because it's not visible in the visible spectrum. This was clearly stated by Corbell as conveyed to him by people who spoke about the event.
The change in color if you look closely is the camera adjusting, not the object. you can see buildings in the background change color at the same time as the object.
Get out of here with your facts.
Have nobody understood what all of this is? how stupid are you all to not have seen the link?? Do anybody want a hint from an somebody who have seen it a couple of times. but brushed it of until the last tree years, but have done his homework. I can point you in the right direcction.. or you can all contintue to sleep, believing its aaallll only aliens...
I agree - It’s pretty clearly something on the camera housing cover, not lens itself (most likely avian excrement, yes)
Note: I’ve had undeniable UAP experiences (imo) - and believe fully. I also know bs when I see it.
All the debunking of the “smudge” theory here is accounting for the camera lens only, not the protective casing the imaging system is housed in.
Also, WSO’s and technicians may be professional observers, but they’re human - please believe me, I’ve also experienced “highly trained” pilots etc. make silly errors
**7 years in the RAF Regiment (ret.) here - it was also on deployment in Mazar-e-sharif, Afghanistan, early days of Operation Herrick, I saw a UAP (one of).
/rant
I have to agree that it looks like a smudge. It is very likely bird poop. And the reason the smudge may seem to move is perhaps due to subtle adjustments of the auto-focus capability of the camera. I wouldn't be surprised if the clip - that part which is spoken of but that we have yet to see - that shows it disappearing it into water is just the camera further zooming in and therefore making the smudge disappear.
Nowadays we see distraction after distraction: blown poop out of proportion.. wots next (to the Moon)? 😊
I’VE SEEN ONE OF THESE!! But MUCH bigger! Aside from size everything seems to be the same. It flew right over our house barely above the trees. It was completely silent. Looked metallic with chain like “tentacles”. It was the same color as the sky and blended in perfectly as it glided over us. I remember it being a little bit smaller in width than our two car driveway and it left a weird black trail behind it. Not of smoke or anything. It was just darker than the rest of the sky. I’ve been searching for this damn thing online for years, as this happened back in 2009 and is what started my ufo obsession since. No matter what I came up with, there was absolutely no logical explanation for it. I was even emailing a dude from the Adler Planitarium about it for a while there, as he seemed very interested too. PLZ LET ME KNOW IF ANYONE ELSE HAS SEEN THIS THING!!!
Tell the Story to LA Marzulli. He is an expert. He has a TH-cam Channel.
No-but-I-saw-a-black-triangle-once-only-about-5-years-ago...I-was-fishing-and-it-actually-appeared-in-a-place-in-the-sky-I-was-already-looking...It-was-about-10ftx10ft-in-motion-going-in-a-straight-line-about-1000ft-high-moving-maybe-300mph-and-it-just-appeared-and-disapeared-all-within-2seconds-as-if-it-became-visable-for-just-a-moment-and-then-went-back-to-invisable...For-those-2-seconds-though-I-saw-it-clear-as-day...Still-can't-wrap-my-head-around-it-to-this-day.
Did you film it and capture what you seen ?
how are atheists going to react when they learn the FSM is real?
@@feeltheforce10 sadly no. My ex-husband and I just froze.
It's obviously a smudge or piece of fuzz. Given the panning perspective, from right to left, one of the so-called tentacles should have overlapped with the other, but it remained stationary to the view of the camera, which means it is fixed to the lens itself.
I think the US military would be able to figure this out for themselves. Obviously its not a smudge.
Does that explain why it changes size in relation to the optical zoom?
Exactly. If it was actually a 3D object we'd expect to see it from various angles instead of the same one for the duration of the video. Nothingburger.
Then why did it go underwater for 17 minutes
You mean the one key part that isn't shown on video? Im skeptical about this one. Looks like a camera artifact @@kenoreyna4593
Looks like what the Indian scientists encountered in the Ladakh region in 2004:
"A five-member group of geologists and glaciologists led by Dr Anil Kulkarni of the isro's Space Applications Centre in Ahmedabad were on a research trip through the barren Samudra Tapu Valley. They filmed a four-foot tall 'robot-like' figure, that 'walked' along the valley, 50 m away from them. The humanoid object then rapidly became airborne and disappeared. The encounter lasted 40 minutes. It was seen by 14 persons including the six scientists." - The Register
Thats very interesting thanks
Interesting. But if the scientists filmed it, where's the footage?
heart and read about that one too, very close to this. Wow!
did I miss this news in media? any reported source ref., i don't doubt on you but looking for more details.
@@pixxelpusherconfiscated and probably sold to a superpower nation for analysis.
This guy knows what it is as much as we do
Bird shit?
😄😃
So what your saying is...He's PLAYING THE FOOL? and he's doing it very well ;)
or less
A bug splatter?
the background also changes "color" when the object does as well. it's clearly a temperature rescaling automatically done by the camera software
At 2:24 min you can see that the first small building object which comes into the view of the camera (top left) also changes its "signature" from dark to a lighter shade. Which for me implies that it is a camera scaling effect.
Yes alien is NOT going to be changing colours to match the view of the camera over there!......
@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307 dude you have NO idea what aliens might be doing and nobody does
Fake video.
@@tomrogers9467 Nah its just a smudge on the screen i do like how they edit the video to zoom in and move it across the screen location but they didnt do this for all the videos! some videos it stays right in the same spot on the screen! LOL
Weird looking thing. I would say it was a drone or a balloon, but it's highly unlikely that a drone or a balloon would disappear under water for 17 minutes and then pop back out and take flight again. That is one strange object.
That is assuming it is not capable of going into hiding. A drone with a low presence mode is more likely.
They don't show the underwater part because that would prove it's real et.
It seems quite large (hard to tell from the video) and the 2 military personnel walking beneath it didnt seem to notice or hear anything (it was dark at the time of the footage). Are large modern hovering drones completely silent?
There’s no footage for the water bit, hmm I wonder why
They could well have been operating it?@@1183newman
This is a nighttime recon of a location using night vision camera. Cameraman is viewing through a chopper door window. You will notice the camera sways slightly left/right as it is handheld. Camera zooms in/out slightly - but the interest is NOT the “jellyfish”, they are looking for subjects on the grounds. This is either a bird dropping or insect smear on the window (not camera lens).
You even can clearly make out how the stuff of the smudge is driping down on the bottom of the smudge. Thats what they think are "wierd leg like things".
Its not legs but clearly snot drops runing down on some surface.
Also they are not *following* anything in this video.
They are just doing their standard survailance sweep is all.
But hey yeah, apperently the UAP is trying its damn hardest to stay in the path of the camera not matter what.
Because thats what UAP's do, right?
They colour change is in the entire frame. Has none to do with the smudge alltogether. Its just the camera sensor adjusting for a new light situation and having a tiny bit of problems with at first, as is normal.
Also the change in dimensions (sometimes it looks like a 2D ghost, sometimes it looks like a well pronounced 3D object ... thats the light falling in from way different angles and shaping the object differently-
And so on and on and on ...
Stop being so gullable people.
Just stop.
@@chuckycheeser Is it?
@@chuckycheeser And where can i look at the big deal the government is making about it?
Other than the attention and headlines you mentioned which have nothing to do with the government.
The media and the headlines are making a fuzz about everything that twitter tells them to. So, eh ... ;)
But where can i see the fuzz the gov. is making about it i mean other than one, or two statemeants about it.
Which they do with literally anything they are asked about.
Thanks for replying btw.
It's weird not wierd.
@@TheHaratashi Thank you for correcting me.
What’s unlikely is that Jeremy Corbell would release anything to the public he hadn’t vetted in every way first. George taught him better than that!
that's what makes me think it's not a ghillie drone and something more provocative.
Bruh my immediate first thought that if it came from Jeremy and George it’s for sure vetted this whole news vid is very misleading
Corbell got all hot and bothered by the 'Baghdad sphere' UFO which was later confirmed to be a small balloon.
Corbell has been known to release videos without much scrutiny, such as the videos of green triangle craft with FAA compliant standard beacon lights flying near the USS Russell in 2019, and the Camp Wilson hovering red lights from 2021 which turned out to be slow-burning sounding flares.
He's getting desperate.
The most potentially amazing thing they could have shown (going into and out of the water) is not in the video. Without it, we are left with more prosaic explanations. Mine would be a balloon (or balloons) with some kind of loose foliage or netting draped over it. It only floats. It doesn't speed away and make sharp turns, or any of the 5 Observables in this video.
Why do you think it would only show up in infrared?
It's on a search and destroy assignment, that's why it's cloaked.
@@LobexxDo we know if this was daytime or night time? Technically, a small consumer drone is “invisible to the naked eye” from 300 feet away. Did the try to use regular light camera on this? There are too many questions
Where’s the freakin part where it go’s into the water then shoots off at high speed??? WHERE’s THAT PART!!!???
Still in production. They're gauging interest.
FOLLOWING
Where’s the uap
Because this is more hard to fake than an object just moving around
@@Anwrimos23Or more classified footage, and harder to get footage. Military love their little secrets
Why mention footage showing it go under water and resurface but not show that???
I have looked and that footage isn't anywhere to be found. I doubt it exists. It is bird poop on the outside glass of the FLIR camera housing.
Maybe they don't want to scare anyone, i seen the clip after it came out of the water and it's clearly not from this world
@@christucker8174😂 ..k
@@drganknsteinclearly not of this world. I thought it looked like a roll of toilet paper partly unrolled. Clearly from Uranus. 😂
We have nothing that can hover in and out of water there's no fuel even being burned @@adrielburned6924
How easily people are distracted today
iT's A dIsTrAcTioN
You know it could be real and a distraction at the same time, They just save these clips for when they need to distract everyone from Epstein's list lol but they are real authentic ufo clips
Grab a stick , hit the pinata' , 🍬🍬🍭🍭🍫🍫🤸♂🐑
Always makes me laugh when weird unexplainable stuff happens and then some expert comes along and tries to sound logical or has answers....
We don't know much about anything in this bizarre reality.
no shit. "it can't go from hot to cold because its not currently possible as far as we know" LOL Solid brother! incredible work! some tech company needs to hire this goon so he can drop everyones IQ in there immediately !
@@Kitties-of-Doombackground changes color as well as this drone/bird crap. It's a camera adjustment effect. *mic drop
@@derekfume8810also flir is renowned for causing ghost imaging, looking like it’s coming in& out of picture, like the Aguadilla balloon( this is just a bunch of balloons🤷♂️
@@derekfume8810 youre gonna need to pick up that mic again cuz what you said is bullshit lol. The background doesn't change. The roofs remain the same, white. "camera adjustment" its an infrared flir , it has two setting, black hot and white hot. When switching between two modes the colors invert completely. White roofs would turn black etc.
@@derekfume8810Clearly not true as the object passes over the dogs in the video. The object is black, the background white. There's a longer version of the video out there. Somebody zoomed in and stabilized the footage well enough that you could see the middle "appendage" move behind / between the outer two. It pretty clearly looks three-dimensional in the zoomed-in footage. That was the nail in the coffin of the "smudge" hypothesis to me. It's also shown entering the water in a controlled descent. Definitely not balloons either. Personally? I think humans have no idea just how weird the universe is. We're pretty naive to it all, I'd bet. 🤷♂️
Last year while on a cruise south of Cuba I was up on the open decks one night when I noticed a similar looking object that was following the ship at roughly the same speed. Suddenly it ascended to a very high altitude while beginning to glow while making very rapid movements and finally vanishing.
Sure🤥
This one is invisible to the naked eye.
Hey Buddy - get off the gear
How drunk were you?
Uh huh, and this was after how many drinks at the bar?
People thinking the camera guy was following this smudge when he was just doing his surveillance duty.
these spiritual beings demon entities
Damn birds lol
It's a bird poop stain on the window pane in the camera housing.
The camera and reticle sits behind the glass and can pan, tilt and zoom independently of the housing it is in.
Birds quite frequently will roost on top of the balloon camera housing.
The change in color is the glare it is receiving from lamp posts and lights down below.
The camera housing spins around 360 degrees under the tethered balloon,
hence the bird poop stain moving at the same speed the housing is rotating.
It would go an incredibly long way if anyone knew what the wind speed and direction was when the footage was taken? Is it propulsive or drifting during the time shown? Did any radar systems capture the ultra-high velocity departure later?
these are the questions the "experts" are not asking hehe.
It went into the water for 17 minutes
its iraq in october mate … there is no wind 😂
there's another new video of it on newsnation today. and at the 0:39 to 0:40 second mark in the video a flag can be seen. The flag isnt moving at all until the object passes by it. As the object passes by it the flag blows in the same direction as the object.
@@adamhodgson4185 there's always wind.. but what speed and direction it was moving at with respect to this object is the key question here. Incidentally even in December (which is the calmest month for wind in Iraq) the wind speed is still an average of 10.4 km/h. The wind at that time of year is shifting from the short summer period where it is predominantly blowing from the west, into a north wind that sticks around for the majority of the year. It is especially difficult to guesstimate the wind speed or direction in Iraq *specifically* in September to October! ... It only took me like 5 minutes to piece that together with some quick research.
Why does it always face the camera? As it travels distance, shouldn't we be seeing another angle of the object at some point?
that's because it's bird shit
That's my point of view too, it's a smear on the protective bubble of the optical system, the camera doesn't follow any object and if the image and the smear are "sharp" it's because the lens uses hyperfocal, which gives an image with a very large depth of field.
@@Pierre-Leloup I don't know much about camera hardware, would that still be able to explain why it changes size in relation to the optical zoom? It's a sort of illusion from the hyperfocal depth of field?
@@lefty-dev Hyperfocal can be used preferably with a large angular. I imagine that the on-board optics is a zoom or that the optical system is composed of several optical blocks? In reality, the answer lies in knowing exactly what surveillance equipment is being used. In the case of using a wide-angle zoom, it would be normal to see the size change by what I believe to be a smudge. I'm no Mike West, UAPs are an important subject that I'd rather see confirmed by much more convincing images, wouldn't you?
i saw an interview of a lady that says she saw a “blob” similar to when predator becomes invisible when she was in her deer stand - i believe she was in ohio
NEWS NATION I LOVE YOU!!! Thank you for your continued coverage on this subject
Since the object in question never moved any of its appendages while gliding by; I'd say it was an 'add-on', after the fact.
It is not turning hot and cold. The Marines running the camera are adjusting the thermal temp, it is the camera making it look hot and cold.
If the equipment was set to display an object's _relative_ temperature e.g. as compared to the average in the frame, then whenever that frame moved from a hotter background to a colder background (or vice versa), the object's colour/shade would change conversely.
Why would military equipment have that? Human body temp and engine temps are widely known so being calibrated to those is crucial. Furthermore the objects in the background would also change not just the object.
@@elmexicanoforlive The background does change.
It is as if the exposure or contrast is being changed.
Thermal imagers will make the hottest and coldest objects either white or black, based on the settings of either white-hot or black-hot. The fact the UAP changes colors only means it is neither the hottest or coldest object in the field of view, and the processor is constantly attributing various shades of gray to it as the camera pans across the landscape.
I want to believe but if it's a real object we are also implying that it's tidally locked to the camera, like the moon facing always the same side to earth?
A snot on camera's transparent shell would easily solve this.
Drone cameras are usually behind a protective piece of glass. When the camera moves or zooms a smudge on the glass would appear to move as well. If the camera looks up the smudge would appear to descend and if it looked down quickly the smudge would appear to shoot up! The smudge is not on the lens but the glass in front of it. I love Jeremy's work but think about what this is more likely to be.
Yeah, you're probably right. What if there is footage of it going under water, and the "smudge" disappears while it's under, and when it resurfaces, the smudge comes back?
With the footage we have, I'd guess it's not "alien". I'd like to see more, of course.
and a trained technician is going to follow that smudge, that changes heat sig, for over an hour? and that smudge somehow disappears underwater and reappears to fly away? at some point you must realize, a smudge doesnt explain this. also, by your description this smudge would be obviously unable to be followed across an entire camp if the camera was rotating behind the smudged glass. it would turn away, the smudge going opposite, and disappear off screen, which doesnt happen.
no matter what it is, the idea that this is a smudge is just poor attention to detail or a desperation to explain away anything unknown.
@@magicalfungi3206 yeah, and even though it's grainy footage, there seems to be too much detail in the "smudge" which, to me, would be more blurry. Also, do heat sensors get smudges the way optical ones do? I know nothing about optics.
Unfortunately I can't agree with your logic as I am only referencing this footage. 1. The change of color is not explained just speculated. 2. There is no footage of it going under water yet. 3. The object is not the focus of the surveillance, the base is. Here is a more detailed explanation. It's like an optical illusion. There is the base which the camera is looking at. Then much further away is the drone with a camera on it. But between the camera and the base there is a piece of protective glass that surrounds the camera. The smudge or chip is on the protective glass. When the camera rotates behind the glass, the center or its cross hairs pass by and around the smudge. Because you are watching from the fixed perspective of your monitor its looks like the smudge is moving but it's not. The smudge is stationary on the glass and its just the camera moving around and past it. When the smudge moves off the screen that's just because the camera is pointing to and looking through a part of the the protective glass that is not dirty. In addition just remember that the drone is moving constantly while the camera is looking around independently which contributes to the illusion of the smudge moving even more. Hope this helps . @@magicalfungi3206
I would guess fixed or minimal focus would be more suitable for surveillance as it would capture most detail. Again the smudge is not on the lens or a technical problem with the camera. Its a defect on the protective glass surrounding the camera.@@middle-agedmacdonald2965
FYI, the paper at the beginning of this report is not "published", just made available on a pre-print website
If it wasn't for easily faked smudges on really grainy camera footage, we would never know they was here 🤔 😂
We never seem to be ready for them.
It was at night? With an infra red camera?
For decades the media says not true not true, tin foil hate people. Now they are trying to convince us otherwise. Interesting timing
Thank you NewsNation for your continuous coverage on this topic! 🙏
Similar to what I put in another video, the excitement and shock are natural. However, from a security perspective, this is a major issue that must be addressed, and that starts with transparency to the public.
Transparency? Why is this word used when it's called telling the "thruth" as if using the word Transparency will get you answers doubtful it's just a nice word to throw around. Look at all the Transparency with Biden.
Yes, the military should be required to inform the public every time a bird shits on one of their windows.
It looks a little like someone with a jet pack. Maybe wearing some sort of reflective or mirrored suit. ???
Its a good chance this is a demon or some type of spirit
but then the color would be always black, because of the temperature of the engine
I would love to know what our country’s civil servant analysts think it is, we, as the public, will never have the full picture to draw a reasonable conclusion.
No one in their right mind would assume for a moment that this is a camera smudge. Jesus... 🤦♂️
I've already passed by five different comments before you were saying that. unfortunately people do assume that 😖
EXACTLY!
Except for the fact it never changes perspective or angle. Kinda like a ....
@@shawnm8232except it does multiple times
@@shawnm8232I
Mean what smudge changes thermal temperature infront of a million dollar thermal weapon system?
It doesn’t change colours… it’s the optics system changing from white hot to black hot or vice versa in an attempt to differentiate a foreground object. The people are “oblivious” because it’s either night and they can’t see it, or they see it and aren’t making a big deal about a horse or unicorn balloon. (You can see legs hanging)
omg thank you
It annoys me when people say something is impossible when it crystal clear that there's so much that we dont understand yet as a civilization
It looks like a hit on one of the glasses in the camera, which explains the color change, as the camera moves the light hits the glass and causes the hit area to change colors.
It went into the water for 17 minutes😂
Dude, stop coping
As the 21st century began, human evolution was at a turning point. Natural selection, the process by which the strongest, the smartest, the fastest, reproduced in greater numbers than the rest, a process which had once favored the noblest traits of man, now began to favor different traits. Most science fiction of the day predicted a future that was more civilized and more intelligent. But as time went on, things seemed to be heading in the opposite direction. A dumbing down. How did this happen? Evolution does not necessarily reward intelligence. With no natural predators to thin the herd, it began to simply reward those who reproduced the most, and left the intelligent to become an endangered species.
Yeah but we're being pushed backwards by the elites
All true, but IMO the two most significant events that had a detrimental effect on our gene pool were the agricultural revolution, when for the first time in human history we could, on a large scale, feed those who would have otherwise died in harsh winters and/or couldn't fend for themselves. The other most significant event was the recent advent of birth control. For the first time in human history, the best and the brightest are having the fewest children instead of the most, at least in the western world. These two events combined are an evolutionary disaster for our species. I'm not suggesting we should turn back the clock in any way, just pointing out the reality. I don't think we're capable of addressing the issue for myriad reasons.
Lol, I’m Not Sure.
@@Anymouse6457are you an unscannable?
@@kevinmd1974lmao
If it was a smudge it would be more closer to us and it would be less pronounced, this object moves on its own when the camera doesnt follow completely, its not a smudge
Some have mentioned the camera could be housed within a glass dome which has a smudge on it and as the camera moves the smudge would pan across it slightly although imo if that was the case then the smudge would probably be a blur on the lense and not so sharp. Others mentioned the camera could use multiple lenses together which could also support the theory of a smudge. I think it personally unlikely that this is a smudge but without knowing the exact details of the camera system and how it works we cannot be sure. Also i suspect any real UAP footage the US military acquires they will keep that a secret and instead release footage similar to this that has doubt and possibility for debunking. If this UAP did infact submerge into a lake for 17 mins before flying up into the sky then that would immediately dismiss any doubt that this is a UAP. Hopefully we get that footage.
if this was a smudge i dont think corbel would risk his reputation on releasing this video. he brought forth the tic tac ufo. so i think he vetted the shit out of this video before going public with it. @@1183newman
This is a cargo net with cargo being moved by helicopter, you can even see the attachment points in places.
This is awesome I've been waiting 45 years for this since my first (of many) close encounters!
Looks like a lighter-than-air balloon. In high school we used to make them from those thin, filmy polyethylene bags that you receive your dry-cleaned suits in. Filled ‘em with hydrogen that we generated from a well known chemical reaction. Usually had water vapor that tended to condense inside the bag.
And one that seems can go in & out of water? so some who have seen the full video have stated, that's a good trick but unlikely, it seems balloons always come into the argument somewhere along the line by someone ;) The Military at the time of ROSWELL would have loved this description (except one of their own Jesse Marcel broke PROTOCOLS & stated that that balloon parts he HAD to have photo taken with was nothing like the objects he had seen at the crash site...when asked further...he glanced skyward & I think his words were it was from another world or something along those lines...Yup even the good old, rather pathetic Mr West the world's know it all debunker...likes the balloon theory ;)
a cruise captain taped the same thing over the water recently
which also didn't display any strange physics other than floating like a balloon.
@@megahemphead ya wanna see the whole video from this one where it goes in the water then shoots up into space 15 minutes later
What type of drone or aircraft filmed the alleged object and why didn't it close the distance?
It could also be a bird dropping in the window of a chopper.
I am not a scientist, but my father was one.
Dad only believed in things he could hold, break up and examine.
Basically the original tenets laid down by the great man Sir Francis Bacon, (who lived during the reign of Queen Elizabeth 1st of England).
Bacon laid down the approach of objective and experimentive research, empirical research.
Inspired by Bacon's treatises and other work, a group of scientists created the Royal Society, which exists to this day.
So, my basic instincts tell me, whomever, or whatever, is operating that machine (once it is proven to be an actual object, not a digital artifact) must carry a power source that can run all the tiny cameras all over it, reflecting its immediate surroundings (if human made, and the US Army tested such equipment during the Iraq war, probably that film has been removed by the great distopian youtube controllers).
However, it seems to me that the system requires a lot of power, so it needs to be used only when necessary.
Lastly, the ability to suspend gravity without exothermic thrust, which is really noisey, or propellers, equally noisey, means this unit, if real, is WAY BEYOND what is publicly known.
Lastly, I cannot believe these academicians who forget the fundamentals and complicate things.
The system obviously needs to shut down to conserve power.
So you believe the earth is flat?
@@MrShanester117😂😂😂😂OMG! And somebody worked so hard on this novel. So proud...🤣😂😆😆😆
Relax, it's a drone with foil camouflage attachments. Or a bird crap. Either of two.
No need to write a novel about some bird shit on a lense. Jeremy Corbel strikes again.
is a spit on the camera lense
Not possible for something to change temperature that fast. How can they know if they don't what that object is!? 😂
I think what he meant is that there's no prosaic explanation for it.
Its possible he meant, by our earthly understanding of thermodynamics
Looks like bird poop.
It's the exact shape of a drippy dried splat. It's completely static in shape and moves exactly like it's stationary in front of a moving camera, with the buildings also moving in parallax.
Where’s the other half of this video? Where can I view it?
I love reading people's responses. So sure we're alone here, that there's no possibility this is real. "CGI", "balloons".... Everyone is in for a reality check and it will be obvious in hindsight, just do the basic math
No, I am NOT sure that we're alone here, but this is far from being evidence that we are not.
I'm gonna be honest, i'm obsessed with UFO's.
No way are we alone
But this looks like it really could be a balloon to me, especially if people just thought nothing of it.
camera artifact
@@L8Pl lmao. A balloon? Eglin, just stop.
I did the basic math. Distance is a big problem
The comments regarding "How could military experts possibly confuse debris on a predator drone camera shield for a UAP?", firstly the chain of custody of this video has not been revealed. What does that mean? That means that we don't know exactly who submitted the video to news outlets, or whether or not it passed through any sort of military investigation prior to being leaked. So, lets say it was a smudge on a predator drone camera shield, and let's say that the guys who flew the mission thought it might be hilarious to upload the video online as a UAP video just for laughs. Definitely possible. A smudge on an external shield would behave exactly as you see in the video because the camera operates independently of the external protective shield, lending the illusion of an object moving. Additionally, the object moves at the speed of the drone, but independent to the swivel of the camera, so I would like to see a more detailed breakdown explaining why this isn't a smudge on the protective camera shield. Trust me, I am someone who wants to believe that this isn't a smudge. I know that UAP are real, but the way this was released brings up some red flags (no chain of custody, claims of amazing movement of the craft which are conveniently not available in the video, the lack of any shadow or observation of the craft from the ground, no secondary sources whatsoever, no radar, the craft maintaining a speed 1:1 with the drone, the craft maintaining consistent horizontal placement in relation to the drone, etc etc)
no shadow because its night vision (at night) there are no shadows - (2) they said it passed underwater for 17 min then reappeared... thus, not a smudge
@@peterlongprong7521 Why do they say it and don't show it? Was it underwater at all or just a panned smudge? Was it the same video of the same supposed drone?
Uploading predator footage is an opsec violation.
Lol it went under water.... Trust me bro lol
Also EVERYTHING in the background changes color temperature not just that smudge. So clearly it's just a temperature adjustment from the camera operator lol. Are these people being serious. Are we watching the same video?
@@peterlongprong7521
“They said”. Who said? Regardless, just because someone says something doesn’t mean it’s true. Where is the rest of the footage? No one can seem to find it. Why is that?
Quite obviously a ballon . Its actually embarrassing that it gets news time
could be something as simple as an item being moved by helicopter , and the support cable being temperature neutral isn't showing up on the IR filter .
It looks like a loogie.
It’s both thrilling to think about but also scary as hell
what is 'scary as hell' about it?
@@positivelastaction3957the “thing”
There are only two possibilities.
1. We are alone, or
2. There are other species out there.
Both are equally terrifying.
here the question is not whether they exist millions of light years from us but whether they are here@@kingdong7517
@@kingdong7517 congratulations, you are the 50,000,000th person to regurgitate this quote!
There is additional footage showing this flying over water, and some thing that is invisible, would not cast a shadow, especially under a thermal camera. Yet somebody decided to include a shadow to make it more realistic, forgetting that physics is a thing.
The chopper at distance going one direction, circulating the object, which is stationary in the middle between the chopper and the landscape/horizon, without realizing the camera is in reality tracking the houses, very much like zooming your camera at the mountain and a fly enters the frame few meter ahead, the UAP just so happens to be closer to the camera than the horizon, almost as if the chopper and the horizon are rotating around the center point which is where the UAP is in this dynamic.
The color changing is indeed related to temperature changing (due to this being a thermal camera), which proves that the object is stationary or slower, the chopper is circulating it, eventually framing the side of the object that is facing the sun, which is hotter, then framing the other side, which is colder, thus, changing the temperature at face value and perspective, and because there is this changing in temperature i know this was not recorded at night, the sun was up still, i would dare to guess somewhere about 17:15 PM.
I saw on another video that this was filmed from a static aerostat.
1977 in Finland and Russia there was a ufo with “jellyfish “ morphology.
1947 in Ireland some lady saw a leprechaun steal her thimbles
A camera smudge that stays under water for 17 minutes, reemerges and then shoots off into the air at an impossible speed. Ok. Gotcha. Wow camera smudges are so technological these days!
and where is the footage of that? Show me what you got!
@@megahempheadProve it isn't real then, go on.
Cia is very happy watching how stupid we all became
@@gridone769 No one has to prove something isnt real. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim..... thats you bruh
@RobertELee420 I could make the same argument to you, you're making the claim that's its fake, so what's your hypothesis a smudge on the screen or a balloon?
Maybe it's a tiny particle trapped inside lenses in the camera.
The guest says rapid cooling and heating "isn't possible" entirely too much considering the situation.
One has to imagine the US has super advanced drone technology. I wouldn't be surprised if we have one that can enter the water too. To me it looks like a drone with "seaweed" or some other matter hanging from it. It's at a military base near water. You have to think they're testing and using this things often in foreign lands. I'm not a UAP skeptic, but to me this object is most likely ours. JMO.
Agree and we have invisibility technology
The main issue with it being debris on a drone is that the tentacles or seaweed as you said are completely stiff seemingly metallic in nature
If this thing has been going in and out of the water, ive been thinking it might be covered in seaweed or something like that.
I liked your thinking brotherI liked your thinking brother
How many cousins married in your tree?
Have you ever been to an ocean? Have you ever learned about oceans? There isn’t sea weed just floating everywhere or just below the surface.
@@user-mw6jo7ql1cjust a thought dude. Take it easy
@@user-mw6jo7ql1c take easy pal. I'm merely speculating it might be covered in some type of aquatic plants or something. If it's been going in and out of the water.. why TF do you have such a strong reaction, lol. Does seaweed not come from the sea?
You can see it move at its own speed over the buildings when you compare it with the camera.
My query here is, if the military detected this, and actually followed it on thermal camera, why did they not put out an alert. Why did those men walk so calmly under it. Surely all hell would have broke lose? A lot about this isnt making any sense. Strange as hell though.
What I notice is that the angle of the object never changes. It is like the object is flying at the exact same speed and exactly parallel to the drone. Camera artifact or smudge is most likely.
Did you even watch the video? The UAP obviously moves independently of the reticle. A "smudge"would stay in one place. It also wouldn't be in focus.
@@mitsuracer87So then how does it stay perfectly in sync with the camera. You never see the object even a bit from the other side.
Object synchronization another alien super power.
The camera can turn and move inside a protective shell.
The smear is on the glass of the shell and appears to move while the camera pans around.
You couldn't fathom something other than yourself existing
@@okaminmbr9 ... I " fathom " an opinion ...You insult rather than reason a response.
@@okaminmbr9 When they visit, everyone will see them. It won't be a mystery. Just like when we landed on Mars.
It would not change size when the camera zooms
@@okaminmbr9 I can't fathom your brain existing
Yeah and it's traveling in direction of the wind as you can see in background flags fluttering. Definitely advanced aero tech or alien! Thanks Newsnation for keeping Corbell relevant and increasing the stigma. Brilliant!
Why is no one saying CGI? How easy is it to do this?? This would explain why no one on the ground saw this thing
I love how the security camera time stamp shows October 2018... Did anyone stop to think that maybe it was undocumented special military drone testing???
The oldest video with something similar is from 2000, in Turkey. That's pretty damn old, for something to still be in the testing stage. It would also be too old to not have any leaks about it's existence.
@@davidgreen5994 propaganda. Classified Intel is secure for as long as the government chooses to keep a secret. I mean really, Donald Trump is serving his second term right now but Biden is in the hot seat to manipulate your perspective so trump can have an extra term and more time to figure out how to take total control over the United States of America and our people. They're all in on this shit together. They're only dividing us so that they can have hope we don't see beyond the curtain of oz and overthrow the tyrants as they are right now. I don't know what's going on in this video. It's shady AF but still, TRUST IN GOD, NOT THE GOVERNMENT
Probably a drone of some type. It may even be testing the bases.
BALLOONS PEOPLE !!!
I don't think ballons would have maintained such a steady speed. I could buy ballons maintaining a steady altitude, but the speed? I don't think it is that.
you really a dumbass? how many people launching balloons XD
@@nigelhirth2181
Obviously, you've never watched balloons floating in the wind.
What is the color and shapes of the ballons? What company made them? If you going to state something as fact at least give us some identifying information Please.
@@patrowan7206 i've seen enough to know they travel with the speed of the wind, which is what? Itermittent and inconsistent. The opposite of what this is doing.
You do know what wind is, right? How many constant and invariable breezes you ever seen homie?
having some basic knowledge of how the litening tpod works. I'm curious how something can submerge underwater, become obscured or invisible to the sensor for 17 minutes. But the pod continue to track and able to find it when it emerges. It's not boxed up in PTRK so someone is manually tracking it in ATRK or SCENE. Which makes it even more sus they were able to keep it in visual when it emerges.
Some people will believe based on their personal biases no matter how many facts they are presented with. It's ridiculous that anyone could possibly believe this is a UFO.
What this "expert" does not realize is that the background with the building, people and so on is in focus, the object is blurred, so it is out of focus. That means it must be very close to the camera, and if it's very close to the camera, it must be tiny. Like a smudge on the camera body. People can't see it because it's very close to the camera and very far away from them.
I've heard that if you were watching someone fall into a black hole, they would eventually look as though they are frozen in time due to the massive warpage of space-time from the black hole. If this UAP is able to warp space and time, I wonder if that could explain why it looks as though it is stiff and unaffected by its' surroundings... Interesting
What????? Hahahaha what?
@@ERMAV th-cam.com/video/QqsLTNkzvaY/w-d-xo.htmlsi=UkMCvdEeJky8OukB
The recent stabilized/boomerang edit shows in depth movement of the feet.
The video was recorded at night, so the soldiers would likely not be able to see it. It likely was not making sound either.
It's not visible in the visible spectrum, clearly stated when the video was released. You can't see it period. It's cloaked.
A bird pooped in my mouth once while I was looking up to the sky with my mouth open, so let me tell you; that is no bird poop on that lense.
"heat signature changes aren't possible as far as we know" - yes they are. We have had that technology for years. We have tanks that can look like anything they choose to thermal imagery.
For Pete's sake, it went into the ocean for a short period, and then flew away at a high rate of speed.
where did you see that happen? show me what you got!
@@megahemphead it was a military witnesses and it was caught on the infrared camera the full video is yet to be released but it was reported and it does exist.
We're potentially talking about alient technology, and this guy is saying impossible?
He's implying that if the footage is real then the object is impossible for current human engineering.
The flunkys are claiming its baloons but an up close look shows a very possible pilot on top sitting in what looks like an open cockpit
I'm just hearing morty in my head ... "a smudge on the lens?" the audacity.
if it was a camera anomaly they wouldnt be tracking it moving past anyone so it either means people dont look up like they should or the thing was cloaked. question is what in the hell is it
Can't really tell at what altitude that thing was flying - it could've been just too high for people too notice.
The angle of it would change
Ask hope she's knows it All
it was taken at night with infrared camera my guy
@@A.T.-89 It flies over the people so quickly and with poor quality imaging. But as I look at it, I can almost see at least one persons head turn to their right & up in the last half second of the frame as it passes overhead?
So how did that smudge end up disappearing into the ocean and then shoots off into the sky after 17 minutes? Damn smudge is always doing funny things. Now we want to see the submerging into water and flying into sky part. Release it Jeremy!
That’s the thing though, he didn’t release that part, we’re just going on his word. Why would he leave that part out when it would rule out the most obvious explanation? Why wouldn’t he release all of it instead of just telling us about it?
@@CrazyPangolinLady Jeremy needs to milk this snippet for a while first, multiple interviews with various networks willing to cover it all the while promoting his TH-cam channel and weaponised podcast etc…. Then he might release a little bit more & so on.
Are than any truly decent folks that have the capacity or integrity to broadcast newsworthy material? Sincerely,
Me
also known as grifting whilst also wanting full disclosure, what a clown@@gtaveteran
I wonder how that baloon cloaked itself in stealth on and off damn. Baloons are becoming intelligent.
What we are viewing is a 4D being casting a shadow into 3D space
Anyone else laughing out loud at the part of the conversation about it being invisible? Haha 😂
It's literally invisible. The camera captured it in IR. 😬
Let me put this in terms a five year old could understand. Let's say this is a cube and the front of it is green and the back of it is blue right? If it is moving at that trajectory starting out facing the camera so you only see the green side, by the time it heads away from the camera you would see the blue side. 🤓👌
"It's a space squid" 🥴🥴🥴🥴
It has magical cloaking properties.
@@shawnm8232 so does your IQ
@@HenryOManly That's true and it's on a downward trajectory to zero.
Looks like just a torn plastic grocery bag to me floating because the radiant heat bouncing off the ground, keeping it a float... you see this often in warm countries with trash/garbage problems...
Nothing floats like this. It would be very obvious. It does not behave like trash
You've got to really be coping to say that's a trash bag.
😮 😂😂
Yeah you didn't watch the video. It went into the ocean and then flew off at an insane rate of speed. Lol
It's dirt on the glass housing in front of the camera. It's close to the lens and confusing the camera which is probably why it's changing color. Just my layperson theory but the more I look at it the more likely it seems.
It's visible if a camera picked it up.
For people who know what a floater in your eye is, this is precisely that.
But floaters don't exist in cameras.
Floaters are biological, they are cells and collections of cells.
What would organic matter be doing inside a camera?
@deang5622 I was using that as an example for having something on the lens. Lol, but thanks for your response
@deang5622 lenses are made to be like a mechanical eye. So having something like a nat, or mosquito on it it may look like this. Of course it not a biological thing that is obviously not an eyeball....................
You can obviously see a stationary object that is on the lens. The focus can move but the lens anomaly is very obvious
Does anyone know where the full video is?
They haven't made it yet.
@@jaypee9575 i see
If it's not observed going over 75mph, it's not worth mentioning in a UAP conversation.
It's a smear on the protective bubble of the optical system, the camera doesn't follow any object and if the image and the smear are "sharp" it's because the lens uses hyperfocal, which gives an image with a very large depth of field.
Looks like a balloon with vines wrapped around it. Like a balloon with a Ghillie suit on. 🤷♂
might be a drone with ghillie
The recent stabilized/boomerang edit shows in depth movement of the feet. Please review that NewsNation.
EVERYTHING changed color/temperature, not just the object/lens cover smudge. ALL the objects do this which means that the camera operator was simply adjusting the filter level. Are these people serious?
By the way. The fact that news nation added that additional round filter on the object tells me that they're trying to make it appear more real by hiding the background as much as possible to have this thing APPEAR as if it is actually changing temperature. They're at this point completely exposed to pushing fake shit in my eyes.
News Nation just deleted my comment about the fact that they've applied a filter to this video to prevent you from seeing the false claims that this "object" is changing temperature or contrast. Wow unbelievable. Why would you do that News Nation?
Why did you apply a filter to the video News Nation?
Why are you trying to make this video look more real News Nation?
How does it benefit a News Network for a "UFO" video to be real News Nation?
These debunkers are really reaching for anything.