If you love God’s word then you would use traditional text. If the Greek compilation or translations you use take Jesus’ Deity out of 1TIMOTHY 3:16 and John 3:16 or make Jesus lie to his brothers in John chapter 7 concerning going to the feast then that is not traditional text. Modern Bible translators translate from a corrupted set of codexes which jesuits, catholics and satanists compiled. They worked to replace reliable codexes to translate from, instead using Codex Sinaiticus which was created in the 1800’s which they pass off as the oldest and best “old” Bible; Sinaiticus, they claim is 1500ish years older than it truly is. Then there is codex Alexandrinus which “appeared” about ten years after KJV 1611 was published, and codex Vaticanus which appeared in the Vatican around the 1400’s and was rejected by the scholars that worked on the KJV. Not every verse in scripture was changed but there are changes throughout. In a nutshell, handing Bible Translators something “messed up” to translate “from” makes whatever they translate “to” wrong from the start.
The KJV is not perfect. It had several verses that are not original and were added by scribes long after the original texts existed. You need to actually study the history of the bible because what you said here was false. KJV onlyism is a cult and idol worship.
@@Caden.B there is information available about codex Vaticanus. I am surprised you are not concerned that the Deity of Jesus was removed when incorporating Sinaiticus and Vaticanus into what the translators translate from. A fact Which you can check in minutes by opening a dozen Bible versions.
Why the edge lined tab is tearing? Whether edgelined are not better than vinyl paste down liners with reinforcement..
If you love God’s word then you would use traditional text. If the Greek compilation or translations you use take Jesus’ Deity out of 1TIMOTHY 3:16 and John 3:16 or make Jesus lie to his brothers in John chapter 7 concerning going to the feast then that is not traditional text.
Modern Bible translators translate from a corrupted set of codexes which jesuits, catholics and satanists compiled. They worked to replace reliable codexes to translate from, instead using Codex Sinaiticus which was created in the 1800’s which they pass off as the oldest and best “old” Bible; Sinaiticus, they claim is 1500ish years older than it truly is. Then there is codex Alexandrinus which “appeared” about ten years after KJV 1611 was published, and codex Vaticanus which appeared in the Vatican around the 1400’s and was rejected by the scholars that worked on the KJV.
Not every verse in scripture was changed but there are changes throughout. In a nutshell, handing Bible Translators something “messed up” to translate “from” makes whatever they translate “to” wrong from the start.
The KJV is not perfect. It had several verses that are not original and were added by scribes long after the original texts existed. You need to actually study the history of the bible because what you said here was false. KJV onlyism is a cult and idol worship.
You assert that the king James translators have say over which manuscripts should be used and do not support this claim at all
@@Caden.B there is information available about codex Vaticanus. I am surprised you are not concerned that the Deity of Jesus was removed when incorporating Sinaiticus and Vaticanus into what the translators translate from. A fact Which you can check in minutes by opening a dozen Bible versions.