I mean, think about it, if the robots are so much better at fighting than the humans, if someone invades your country with robots there’s not point in sending humans (since they’re also cheap drones) so it eventually only makes sense to have the robots do the fighting
Some Police forces in the US have been using ground drones with movable arms in incidents where a shooter refuses to co-operate. There are videos online. They have cameras, speakers and mics to enable negotiations and can pick weapons off the floor to enable officers to safely move in. They look like modified bomb disposal robots. Think some do have less leathal weapons on board too.
Scary thoughts man, I’m not pro-drones as they will be used against civilians someday, maybe not this country but maybe. Or even dictatorships that get their hands in this stuff.
@@Jimmythefish577 sure they are all scary for different reason jungle fight mountain fights etc but worrying about drones every minute of your day seems a different kind of scary.
Not hard to modify or upgrade either. Slap on some extra plating. A bigger battery and maybe a 20mm instead of a 7.62. The biggest advances if I had to imagine however will be software coordination of these vehicles.
the ukrainians did not design this they did not innovate... its imported from the west like everything else. soldiers on both sides have been conscripted and forced to fight, they are not good guys vs bad guys.
@@lucabrasi3964 i dont think they would be very good, because they cant handle rough terrain, and they are big and heavy to transport to the battle. Easier to get a couple of men to carry a stretcher.
@@TheMover-to7dy Sorry Putin started it, but America and the Allies are gonna help end it. And, we are going to see Ukraine freed and able to join NATO for future protection.
@@TheMover-to7dy Also, in honesty, sorry that the good people of Russia (like yourself) are the ones that will be paying the price of this stupid, weekend incursion.
Wounded soldier/ ammunition carrier robots. Keeps four soldiers in the fighting per robot. Light/ Heavy machine guns robots in a fixed position. Ambushes, Blocking force, preventing flanking attacks, House to House, etc.
@@CitsVariants You probably don’t understand that the training and life of a soldier is simply more expensive, have you just calculated how much it costs to equip a soldier? Robots have replaced people in the factory because they are cheaper, and the same thing happens on the battlefield.
What else can Skynet do as he goes through rapid unscheduled disintegration while in reentry? Cry in agony and blame humans for their total imbecility of putting their digital child on Boeing?
I really like the concept of having the cart drone to evacuate injured soldiers. Realistically to cover the distance that is needed to move a soldier to where it's reasonably safe for a pickup in Ukraine +/- a mile from the fighting, you need 4 soldiers minimum and if it's longer, your going to need to send 6 because its a damn slog to carry a soldier in field gear over any real distance and trading off is the only way to accomplish a long move quickly. If your section has several serious casualties, the option to send a dozen guys on an evacuation might not always be something that can be done.
@@MohiBaraa-qj9kp no, but I had to do casualty evacuation drills and I know too well how much effort it takes to move a person over a distance and how much it sucks.
@@ottopartz1 Having a robot vehicle do that removes a lot of risk, too. 4-6 soldiers on a long slow slog carrying a comrade to safety are a mighty juicy target in an area that was just proven to be very much under fire.
@@cxsey8587 believe me I see all day how Ukrainian winning on Western media contrary to them even if doesn't happen. Maybe what you want to say is we don't see any Russians video because the Western media bannet them.
"every 600 rounds the barrel needs replacing" Something tells me these guys are going to push that number to the limit before they risk going out and exposing themselves.
Most military tactics are based around moving then shooting. Unless you have a good gyro stabilisation, shooting while moving is going to too inaccurate for anything but close range suppressive fire. Even with suspension and a gyro, it being so tall and light I am very doubtful how accurate it would be on the move anyway.
@@jimtomav20 Completely on board with everything you say. As it is a first generation version, I guess they decided to skip the suspension to "test" the rest. The main reason for moving when shooting is not to get hit by enemy fire - I guess it doesn't matter as much in this case, as there is no human to be injured, just machinery (expensive, nonetheless). This is just thoughts and guesses, I have no expertise at all in this field :)
Something nobody is talking about is that it makes it significantly easier to go to war. Why would people opposed war if "nobody dies" because the soldiers are all robots? It removes one of the deterrents of starting one. Wars are bad for economy. And civilians will always die. Accidental targeting, destruction of power and civil infrastructure that leads to starvation/ disease/ death from the environment, even more government spending being diverted to autonomous weapons platforms that could have gone into improving civil infrastructure. I wouldn't call this a bad development, but it certainly isn't a good one.
Yes, you can't defend your country if you are dead. Russia outnumbers Ukraine massively in terms of soldiers and kit but we've seen by working smart (and this includes health and safety) this 3 day illegal invasion is lasting years despite wave after wave of Russian soldiers entering the meat grinder as it were.
@@raybod1775 Ive seen the battery packs for these first hand and id estimate on average use it would last 2 hours. The 20 hours would only be standby mode as currently it always has systems on power so it can be controlled at range. Look at the battery back and the motors and you can backwards caculate its impossible. But I will not give out any specs.
I can see the value of The weapons platforms, you can carry heavy machine guns across difficult terrain without using soldiers and do it more easily do the fact of their wheeled, which also make them easier to redeploy.
Would make more sense if there were removable light armoured side panels, only if 10 inches tall, to offer the casualty being extracted some protection from small arms fire at least.
"doing what drones do best" Reminding us all that no one is completely 'irreplaceable' and reminding Russian forces that they have been set against a foe that is near 'Sky-net' level of scary.
A 7.62 MG is not a 'potent piece of firepower,' it's handy though and could be a big help in defending in trench warfare being controlled from inside a trench.
The machine basically asks for tank tactics on a smaller scale. Hull-down, sensor up, covering a large area, and trading maneuver- and shooter-roles with another group. I wonder how many of these one soldier can effectively operate. One? More than one? I have no idea.
You probably don’t understand that the training and life of a soldier is simply more expensive, have you just calculated how much it costs to equip a soldier? Robots have replaced people in the factory because they are cheaper, and the same thing happens on the battlefield.
Robots in factories are static machines that perform the exact same task repeatedly with no other influences, they’re not being shot at and having to negotiate varying terrain day and night in all weathers. They’re not comparable.
What if instead of using men on both sides, both countries make giant remote controlled mechs and make them fight in a boxing ring and one head pops off.
@@MrKeiKuro even that is being solved with AI aim. AI targeting. AI object detection (tank, soldier, weapon, helmet, vest, and so on). Then the turret can aim autonomously and destroy a tank for example. Fully autonomous.
I mean whatever is going to help! I feel these are still pretty basic as far as technology goes, not sure 600 rounds through a barrell.before changing it is good enough yet.
I'm pretty sure whoever wrote that had no idea what they were really saying about the barrel and 600 rounds. Probably, like someone else said, after 600 rounds it just needs to cool down.
When did they say any of them were armoured? I even went through the video and description, no where did they say they are armoured. I also have to point out that 7.62 can be several calibers, 7.62X39 to 7.62X54R is a massive difference.
yes it is generous but since we dont know the type of 7.62 is pretty ambigous. just by the video it seems like its a 7.62x51 because the sound/recoil so with the right ammo i can imagine it would be able to go through the rear of something like a BMP at less than 50 meters.
@whya2ndaccount my apologies, I read your comment wrong, I thought you ment the drone could be destroyed with 7.62, and that they said the drone was armoured, that's my bad. But yes, 7.62 by 51 ap and 7.62 by 54r ap could absolutely go through armoured vehicles, especially if you're blasting said vehicles with a full auto gun and 600 rounds, there are many cases where marines got ambushed in Afghanistan while in their humves and took rounds through their windows and doors (which are bullet proof) So I don't think they mean bmp's or tanks, more like the russian equivalent of a hummve (I have no idea how it's spelled), in other words, they should have said LIGHT armoured vehicles, but technically, they weren't wrong.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 86 | คู่เอก "คมเพชร vs ชาติพยัคฆ์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/m3q_dRYDuU8/mqdefault.jpg)
Now let’s replace all the foot soldiers with these guys on both sides. Then we get to watch the world’s biggest battlebots arena
not on the Russian side, I need a hot Russian wife.
lmao its coming. We wake up just to watch a map to see if any side has overwhelmed the other drones/robots.
Followed by scenes from Terminator as the victorious bots massacre cities.
We're winning!
We''re losing...
We're winn-
🪦🪦🪦🪦
I mean, think about it, if the robots are so much better at fighting than the humans, if someone invades your country with robots there’s not point in sending humans (since they’re also cheap drones) so it eventually only makes sense to have the robots do the fighting
The weapons industry must be loving all the field testing they are getting
Absolutley, like every other war ever.
Russia's weapons industry is really not liking the threat of their government disposing them once they are no longer usable
It's like everyday is Christmas
War has always accelerated technical innovation to be fair. It csn be said to be the only good thing to come from conflict unfortunately.
@@chashouse8511 Good point, it has.
Ukraine has become Weapon Testing range .
As were every single wars in history.
@@fredbyoutubing Not for Russians; they never learn.
All warzones are and were.
@@fredbyoutubing Beat me to it.
@@ExplosiveBolts Beat me to it. Every single battle is exactly that.
Imagine this showing up in your neighborhood one day....
Southport - crowd control…….
Some Police forces in the US have been using ground drones with movable arms in incidents where a shooter refuses to co-operate. There are videos online. They have cameras, speakers and mics to enable negotiations and can pick weapons off the floor to enable officers to safely move in. They look like modified bomb disposal robots. Think some do have less leathal weapons on board too.
Scary thoughts man, I’m not pro-drones as they will be used against civilians someday, maybe not this country but maybe. Or even dictatorships that get their hands in this stuff.
Imagine it showing up in yours
& thats a 12mm ( 50 cal) machine gun not a 7.62
These robots can withstand small arms allot better than a soldier. The Ukraine battlefield is a scary place to be.
As opposed to any other battleground? I’m fairly certain they’re all scary.
@Jimmythefish577 no, ukraine is the only scary battlefield.
@@Jimmythefish577 sure they are all scary for different reason jungle fight mountain fights etc but worrying about drones every minute of your day seems a different kind of scary.
Gives me "Sir, you are being hunted" energy
Not hard to modify or upgrade either. Slap on some extra plating. A bigger battery and maybe a 20mm instead of a 7.62. The biggest advances if I had to imagine however will be software coordination of these vehicles.
The barrel does not need to be replaced after 600shots - it needs to either cool down or be swapped for an already cool barrel.
Yeah, that sounded insane.
These sort of ingenious innovation by the Ukrainians will save lives,
Ukrainian lives that is.
Gay Lives Matter
I'm not convinced they're Ukrainian inventions.
the ukrainians did not design this they did not innovate... its imported from the west like everything else.
soldiers on both sides have been conscripted and forced to fight, they are not good guys vs bad guys.
The russians have the same transport drones for evacuating wounded soldiers, pretty sure they will have the turrets as well
@@lucabrasi3964 i dont think they would be very good, because they cant handle rough terrain, and they are big and heavy to transport to the battle.
Easier to get a couple of men to carry a stretcher.
Great little round-up - thanks for not making a long video.
Good luck Ukraine!
I wish my country didn’t start the war. We are paying for nearly 85% of the costs.
@@TheMover-to7dy hello Ivan. We know.
@@TheMover-to7dy you should not vote putin :D
@@TheMover-to7dy Sorry Putin started it, but America and the Allies are gonna help end it. And, we are going to see Ukraine freed and able to join NATO for future protection.
@@TheMover-to7dy Also, in honesty, sorry that the good people of Russia (like yourself) are the ones that will be paying the price of this stupid, weekend incursion.
Wounded soldier/ ammunition carrier robots. Keeps four soldiers in the fighting per robot. Light/ Heavy machine guns robots in a fixed position. Ambushes, Blocking force, preventing flanking attacks, House to House, etc.
two soldiers
@@CitsVariants You probably don’t understand that the training and life of a soldier is simply more expensive, have you just calculated how much it costs to equip a soldier? Robots have replaced people in the factory because they are cheaper, and the same thing happens on the battlefield.
Skynet is pleased, waiting to transmit it's software from the boeing starliner docked in space.
😂 So, you're saying it doesn't work.
What else can Skynet do as he goes through rapid unscheduled disintegration while in reentry?
Cry in agony and blame humans for their total imbecility of putting their digital child on Boeing?
@@totalheresy3826😂😂😂
Necessity is the mother of invention
I really like the concept of having the cart drone to evacuate injured soldiers. Realistically to cover the distance that is needed to move a soldier to where it's reasonably safe for a pickup in Ukraine +/- a mile from the fighting, you need 4 soldiers minimum and if it's longer, your going to need to send 6 because its a damn slog to carry a soldier in field gear over any real distance and trading off is the only way to accomplish a long move quickly. If your section has several serious casualties, the option to send a dozen guys on an evacuation might not always be something that can be done.
@ottopartz1 you analyst in War Strategy😂
@@MohiBaraa-qj9kp no, but I had to do casualty evacuation drills and I know too well how much effort it takes to move a person over a distance and how much it sucks.
@@ottopartz1 Having a robot vehicle do that removes a lot of risk, too. 4-6 soldiers on a long slow slog carrying a comrade to safety are a mighty juicy target in an area that was just proven to be very much under fire.
Looks like a dalek
It looks like a sentry gun from aliens to me...
@1:28 More like the Dalek.
The Lute robot drone with the turret that goes up and down really reminds me of that Doctor who dalek robot death machine.
The middle one reminded me of the sentry guns in the second Aliens film (director's cut)
I was thinking the same thing :D
Call of Duty Black Ops 2 is becoming a reality.
I see Call of Duty becoming reality.
How ukrainian is so smart! Russian can not beat them.
I don't know if that is was a sarcastic comment or not but this is so funny because Russia brushing with Ukrainian on the floor😂😂
@@marinzoltan3573 how is it funny? people are dying on both sides
Russia is doing the same thing, you just don’t see it on most western media
@@cxsey8587 believe me I see all day how Ukrainian winning on Western media contrary to them even if doesn't happen. Maybe what you want to say is we don't see any Russians video because the Western media bannet them.
@@marinzoltan3573 At what cost though?
The world of tanks veterans are gonna get recalled for so many tours in the next few decades.
"every 600 rounds the barrel needs replacing" Something tells me these guys are going to push that number to the limit before they risk going out and exposing themselves.
I feel like this is getting the ultimate "WARHAMMER"
A human still has to reload these robots, Terminator has arrived.😮
One thing I noticed is the lack of suspension. For injured personnel, and for shooting accuracy, it is a must.
Most military tactics are based around moving then shooting.
Unless you have a good gyro stabilisation, shooting while moving is going to too inaccurate for anything but close range suppressive fire.
Even with suspension and a gyro, it being so tall and light I am very doubtful how accurate it would be on the move anyway.
@@jimtomav20 Completely on board with everything you say. As it is a first generation version, I guess they decided to skip the suspension to "test" the rest. The main reason for moving when shooting is not to get hit by enemy fire - I guess it doesn't matter as much in this case, as there is no human to be injured, just machinery (expensive, nonetheless).
This is just thoughts and guesses, I have no expertise at all in this field :)
I bet its already too expensive to actually use it on the field. Adding suspension would just increase the cost.
@@mindaugasrostkauskas9670too expensive? we spend half the US budget on this
@@mindaugasrostkauskas9670 A regular APC costs 3 million dollars. There's no such thing as too expensive
1940s: BIG TANKS, BIG PLANES, BIG EVERYTHING
2024: Small battlebots with a machine gun attached to it
Amazing how we adapt and change lol
Real deal rcx-d man ! Wow
Thank you!
Finally, robotics system will reduce casualties of people.
Until the robots get bored of shooting other robots.
We're so close to the black ops 2 universe guys. See the drone race has just started.
So, the DRONES of SCI-FI WAR MOVIES becomes a REALITY.
This development seems inevitable. And I guess it would be a good thing if future wars where fought by machine armies instead of people having to die.
Something nobody is talking about is that it makes it significantly easier to go to war. Why would people opposed war if "nobody dies" because the soldiers are all robots? It removes one of the deterrents of starting one. Wars are bad for economy. And civilians will always die. Accidental targeting, destruction of power and civil infrastructure that leads to starvation/ disease/ death from the environment, even more government spending being diverted to autonomous weapons platforms that could have gone into improving civil infrastructure. I wouldn't call this a bad development, but it certainly isn't a good one.
"necessity is the mother of invention"
I remember watching history channel in the 90s talking about cell phones and drone warfare.
they get a whole bunch of these things together they can breakthrough.
USA needs these on the border.
Innovation the key of success Bravo Ukraine
Here we go with CyberDyne Systems and the rise of the Terminator.
Get a person from every nation on your team and have them read a giant book at once 😂
Same team same nation
Safety first, even in war times, is a must.
Yes, you can't defend your country if you are dead. Russia outnumbers Ukraine massively in terms of soldiers and kit but we've seen by working smart (and this includes health and safety) this 3 day illegal invasion is lasting years despite wave after wave of Russian soldiers entering the meat grinder as it were.
ruzzia sends troops on e scooters
"all that hate...just to blow these dudes away"
Do they have attachment points for camouflage in the same way that snipers do to make them harder to spot by drones?
That tracked vehicle does not have a 20 hour battery life.
rescue missions are not over night.
How do you know not 20 hours?
@raybod1775 How do you know it isn’t?
@@raybod1775 Ive seen the battery packs for these first hand and id estimate on average use it would last 2 hours. The 20 hours would only be standby mode as currently it always has systems on power so it can be controlled at range. Look at the battery back and the motors and you can backwards caculate its impossible. But I will not give out any specs.
Black Mirror's Metalhead came true, this is beyond dystopian.
I can see the value of The weapons platforms, you can carry heavy machine guns across difficult terrain without using soldiers and do it more easily do the fact of their wheeled, which also make them easier to redeploy.
Would make more sense if there were removable light armoured side panels, only if 10 inches tall, to offer the casualty being extracted some protection from small arms fire at least.
the British have found a great country to fight for themselves.they are very lucky in this regard.
Take Care 💕
"doing what drones do best"
Reminding us all that no one is completely 'irreplaceable' and reminding Russian forces that they have been set against a foe that is near 'Sky-net' level of scary.
This is some good assassin weaponry like from movies like The Jackal or Vantage Point.
Meet the engineer
Slava Ukraini
I imagine operators are going to become desensitized to taking another man's life.
There's actually a tiny person in one of those controlling it all going "beep Boop beep Boop"
A 7.62 MG is not a 'potent piece of firepower,' it's handy though and could be a big help in defending in trench warfare being controlled from inside a trench.
The machine basically asks for tank tactics on a smaller scale. Hull-down, sensor up, covering a large area, and trading maneuver- and shooter-roles with another group. I wonder how many of these one soldier can effectively operate. One? More than one? I have no idea.
welcome back sdkfz 302
You probably don’t understand that the training and life of a soldier is simply more expensive, have you just calculated how much it costs to equip a soldier? Robots have replaced people in the factory because they are cheaper, and the same thing happens on the battlefield.
Robots in factories are static machines that perform the exact same task repeatedly with no other influences, they’re not being shot at and having to negotiate varying terrain day and night in all weathers. They’re not comparable.
Aliens turrets are finally reality
"What you're seeing is advanced warfare"
Instead of starwars clone wars , this is drone wars 😂
You forgot to mention field delivery of filet mignon and lobster tepanyaki !!!
Humanity is going to annihilate itself.
What if instead of using men on both sides, both countries make giant remote controlled mechs and make them fight in a boxing ring and one head pops off.
electric lawnmowers with remote controlled machine gun turrets. Nice
first tanks: armoured car with mashineguns
now: aurmored RC car with mashineguns
Dissapointed this wasnt introduced by Craig Charles. See what the house robots make of them!
What stock are these drones listed under?
battle bots been real quiet since this video came out
That remote Machine-gun, did they get the idea come after watching Alians?
I remember reading about the possibility of those long before even the first Alien movie came out...like in the late 1960s
You wont have to imagine it for long…
Cool concept, but not ready for prime time. Not the weapons grade anyway, the logistical version looks pretty cool.
Ukraine showing how you can do it well and cheap.. America.. Ya those would cost taxpayers a MILLION per unit. Ukrain.. 70K
Trump for President with Elon Musk on government efficiency board!
@@raybod1775 A convict as president and a zombie wannabe businessman as a government board member. What could possibly go wrong?
@@DanielDeBenoit Convicted of what? Paying off a bottom-feeder to stop spreading lies and listing the payoff as 'legal fees'? Oh no how bad of him.
How do they hold up to artillary fire?
Imagine being an online Russian troll and knowing you're on the losing side, but that somehow, you can make a difference.
Enemy Wheelson spotted!
That's the only way to deer hunt right there 🙀
and two steps away from a nasty Terminator.....a wet dream of those with money and power.
Let's pretend the drone jammer doesn't exist.
Awesome, tank drone!!
Would the jammer penetrate heavy(ish) armour? The electronics look well protected. This isn't a lightweight plastic drone with flimsy screening.
@@thebrowns5337 it's jam the signal not the electronic board
@@MrKeiKuro even that is being solved with AI aim. AI targeting. AI object detection (tank, soldier, weapon, helmet, vest, and so on). Then the turret can aim autonomously and destroy a tank for example. Fully autonomous.
@@agemmmyeah tech now can finally do that and being cheap for mass production
First country to do this makes jammers that much less effective
@@agemmm"ai aim" EMP bros...our time is now
Overwatch Bastion - the beginning
born too late to discover the world 😔
born too early to discover the universe 😮
born just in time to watch cyberdyne enslave humanity 🤣
that turrent literally looks like from 2042.
put some padding on the carrier bot please, that does not look comfrable to lay on
well i now know what im asking santa for this year
I mean whatever is going to help! I feel these are still pretty basic as far as technology goes, not sure 600 rounds through a barrell.before changing it is good enough yet.
I'm pretty sure whoever wrote that had no idea what they were really saying about the barrel and 600 rounds. Probably, like someone else said, after 600 rounds it just needs to cool down.
Toys in an exercise in futility….
that is history in the making.
that last one resembles a ww2 Daimler dingo.
Pretty generous description of "armoured" if 7.62mm fire can destroy it.
When did they say any of them were armoured?
I even went through the video and description, no where did they say they are armoured.
I also have to point out that 7.62 can be several calibers, 7.62X39 to 7.62X54R is a massive difference.
@@Balognamanforya How about listening?
0:59: "Its 7.62mm MG can destroy armoured vehicles".
yes it is generous but since we dont know the type of 7.62 is pretty ambigous. just by the video it seems like its a 7.62x51 because the sound/recoil so with the right ammo i can imagine it would be able to go through the rear of something like a BMP at less than 50 meters.
@whya2ndaccount my apologies, I read your comment wrong, I thought you ment the drone could be destroyed with 7.62, and that they said the drone was armoured, that's my bad.
But yes, 7.62 by 51 ap and 7.62 by 54r ap could absolutely go through armoured vehicles, especially if you're blasting said vehicles with a full auto gun and 600 rounds, there are many cases where marines got ambushed in Afghanistan while in their humves and took rounds through their windows and doors (which are bullet proof)
So I don't think they mean bmp's or tanks, more like the russian equivalent of a hummve (I have no idea how it's spelled), in other words, they should have said LIGHT armoured vehicles, but technically, they weren't wrong.
Its 12.7 not 7.62
This is bonkers
We all knew battle bots would end up like this 😂
Noted
Barring extremely good luck, you can't use a gun shooting 7.62 mm ammunition (.30 caliber) to "destroy enemy armored vehicles".
war has become an rts videogame
Is this ground drone immune to explosives? Just asking
depends are we talking firecracker or a fission bomb?
It's a lot more immune than a regular infantryman lol
a 7.62 can destroy armored vehicles?? I highly doubt that.
My heart Always 💕
Ukraine is the testing grounds for weaponry
Sure, just like literally every single other war in human history lol.
Need to start disguising ground drones as small mammals. Opossum maby for recon. Make this one look like a deer. Lol
Awesome for gamers. Though is there no fear for hackers gaining access or denying access to these drones?
What happens when both sides have this tech? Might as well settle it over a game of Battlefield 2 winner-takes-all.
Grenader