Understanding VOR

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ค. 2024
  • This video explains the practical and technical principles behind VOR (VHF omnidirectional range) including the structure and use of the different components of the VOR signal.
    More information about avionics testing: www.rohde-schwarz.com/us/solu...
    Need help with Rohde & Schwarz products & services?
    Contact Us: www.rohde-schwarz.com/us/m4c/...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @LuLeBe
    @LuLeBe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    With all the details that pilots comment on here, i have to say that I really appreciate the technical side. Saw that the video is by R&S and immediately thought that they might finally explain not only what it does but also how it does it, and I want disappointed. Is anything, more theory about how the antenna does the phaseshift would be awesome!
    Nevermind the navigation details, that's what aviation channels are for!

  • @govinddwivedi3548
    @govinddwivedi3548 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation

  • @BATAviation
    @BATAviation ปีที่แล้ว +2

    perfect, ty

  • @johnopalko5223
    @johnopalko5223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    2:27 290 FROM is 110 TO, not 070.

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Good catch - yes, that's clearly a (verbal) "typo". Thanks!

    • @johnopalko5223
      @johnopalko5223 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@pauldenisowski We obsessively pedantic people do come in handy sometimes. 😁

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@johnopalko5223 Frankly, I'm happy people are watching these videos that closely :) The navaid and avionics related videos in this playlist were intended as an introduction for engineers involved in radio frequency test and measurement of navigational aids . There are *much* better videos available for people who are actually trying to become pilots. Thanks again!

    • @mountains_beaches98
      @mountains_beaches98 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I was scrolling down to see this comment

    • @tonycleworth8116
      @tonycleworth8116 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was thinking the same thing John. But seeing as 290 from 360 is 70… I kinda (maybe) see where the error originated. Great vids all the same. 👍

  • @liquidusblue
    @liquidusblue ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for this. I can only fly VFR in Microlights but interesting to know how these work.

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for the feedback!

  • @shashankdahal345
    @shashankdahal345 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank sir

  • @ueberalleberge
    @ueberalleberge 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    very good explained, especially that the second number behind the 3-letter code is the ICAO Chanel, I did not get this info clear on the IFR low enroute chart

    • @delta69er
      @delta69er 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 3-number code is actually the DME channel number. Look at HDF in Riverside, CA. No 3-number code because it is just a VOR. I think it says it in the TPP as well but I can’t remember.

  • @peepa47
    @peepa47 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My friend is from Durham, small world :-)

  • @jankeler4393
    @jankeler4393 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Dispite the fact that this one is online for a good time now... I was wondering, if you might have swapped VAR and REF signal at 5:50. As far as I understand VOR the reference signal is modulated @f_0.

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Hi Jan - Actually, we're both right :) In a conventional VOR (CVOR), the VAR signal is the AM signal (at f0) and in a doppler VOR (DVOR), the VAR signal is the FM signal (f0 +/- 9.960 kHz). Since I didn't cover DVOR in this presentation, I used the VAR/REF assignments for conventional VOR. Thanks for pointing that out!

    • @eurybaric
      @eurybaric 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pauldenisowski Awesome!

  • @MasterMindmars
    @MasterMindmars 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    P E R F E C T

  • @harveymanfrantinsingin7373
    @harveymanfrantinsingin7373 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not to nitpick, as this is great information however.. At the 3-minute Mark you would have been better off quoting the 085 radial, as that is what's shown on the three examples of each planes VOR.

  • @NE-Explorer
    @NE-Explorer หลายเดือนก่อน

    why doesnt the 180 radial result in destructive interference and thus no signal

  • @garryfelker6012
    @garryfelker6012 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 3:41 in the video, there is an error. You cannot fly inbound with the OBS set to the radial you are on. Reverse sensing.

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi Garry - issues like reverse sensing are well beyond the scope of this video. :) The target audience is primarily non-pilots who work on navigational aids and who need a basic overview of navaids: absolutely not a substitute for proper pilot instruction (and I say that as an FAA-certified ground instructor).

    • @johnopalko5223
      @johnopalko5223 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, indeed. When you're tracking a radial, your OBS should be close to your compass heading, not 180 degrees away.

  • @MeaHeaR
    @MeaHeaR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    if the max frequency is 118mhz. why is Romeo bogota ubd Romeo cali bothê at 274 Mhz ¿¿¿

  • @uj6069
    @uj6069 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does DVOR have 48 antennas?

  • @Dorego
    @Dorego 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you please share it with me

    • @pauldenisowski
      @pauldenisowski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you'd like a PDF of the slides, please send us your email and we'd be happy to send you a copy

    • @Rohde-Schwarz
      @Rohde-Schwarz  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Oscar, you can submit your contact data to socialmedia@rohde-schwarz.com. Thanks

    • @Dorego
      @Dorego 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pauldenisowski doregojana@gmail.com.