As a rule of thumb, the more a driving environment requires you to use the brakes, the greater the benefit of a hybrid. Nearly all the hybrid economy gain is from regen braking. It's why taxi drivers love them.
no it isnt. The reason is at low city speeds and lots of starting and stopping the electric motor is far far more efficient. the regen is just the icing on the cake.
So, this would be true for a mild hybrid where the battery is only charged from the wheels. A Toyota hybrid has several tricks it uses to help you save petrol 1. Atkinson cycle engine - gives better fuel economy but less responsive engine, so you need to add something to increase responsiveness e.g. Mazda used a supercharger when they made an Atkinson cycle car, Toyota use an electric motor for this purpose 2. The battery is charged using the engine at more efficient revs. We all know petrol cars are more efficient at higher than lower speeds. A Toyota hybrids stores energy at that higher efficiency for use at lower speeds or power output levels (below 30 hp) 3. Never idles - You'll never catch your hybrid idling if the engine is running it's for a reason - it's either a) warming itself up, b) warming you up, c) charging the battery or d) driving the wheels 4. Discourages rapid driving - they tend to feel better when you're driving moderately and not flooring it, this also helps save petrol. Some of them will even give you a score for how economically you have driven. 5. Fast warm up - electric motors control the coolant flow and there is an egr system to help the engine get up to temperature quickly 6. Regen braking - very noticeable down a long hill just how much energy you can get from regen braking. If you fill the battery going down a hill, the car will automatically switch over to engine braking and will use extra electric power after the hill to get the battery down to 80% quickly - it doesn't want to sit at 100% for long Hope this helps
Gradient plays a big part. You’ll actually get best economy on a Toyota hybrid by not braking. You can’t capture all the energy you lose so you’re better off keeping it.
Unfortunately the vast majority of drivers do the vast majority of mileage on motorways. In this case the hybrid is lugging the extra weight of a battery. Even in town the regen is offset by lugging the extra weight. Then there is the extra manufacturing cost and complexity. The biggest economy benefit of hybrids is on paper.
2023hybrid euro6 vs 2011 diesel euro5? Fair comparison? Next time, compare same age! 1.6hdi, absolutely amazing economy. I have 2 now. As a taxi driver, I owned both prius plug in and 1.6hdi. My verdict, as a taxi driver, Citroen is better. Cheap to buy, cheap to maintain, good economy(800 miles from a tank). All this is in my channel. I just paid less than 5k for a 2016 Citroen c4 grand Picasso 1.6hdi. A 2016 toyota prius/auris/corola hybrid would cost ~£15k~£20k. It doesn't make any sense for me! I am staying with Citroen until 2035 or later.
Youre right but thats a bad comparison too, if u wanna do a hybrid vs diesel u gotta do it with the same version of the car, also theres no need to compare the plug-in hybrid, no one wants that, people coming from petrol and diesel would much prefer a mild or full hybrid rather than a plugin where they dont have or dont want to be bothered with the charging and theres nothing a plugin can do that a full hybrid cant, it just has extra range but much bigger batteries and weight and is MORE expensive to own and maintain, so a fair comparison would be something like a the new Dacia Duster 1.2L Turbo 3 cylinder Mild Hybrid, the 1.6L NA 4 cylinder Full Hybrid and the usual 1.5 dCi that is probably only available in Morocco, but u get the point...
Taxi drivers get around 50mpg because of heavy loads, rushing, and get even less mpg if they do a lot of airport runs! Hybrids don't like steep hills and heavy loads!
My partner has a 2019 corolla which she upgraded to from a 2008 diesel avensis. I have a 2012 prius. Absolutely everything you say in this video is true! Or at least I can say my experience matches yours exactly. I can also add that in the case of the Prius it’s very nice (and weird) to own an 11 year old car that still has 4 year’s warranty on the hybrid system. I always look forward to your videos, and this was an especially good one, thanks!
Nice video, thanks Richard. As an owner of a 2013 citroen of the same model and engine I can confirm that it's super economical on highway at sustained speeds
Is yours also an automatic? How do you like it? Is it smooth? Genuinely curious as I've heard some say they're an automated manual and not too smooth..
@RikAindow mine is the "robotic" one - a manual gearbox equipped with robotic parts (I think Richard's car in the video has got the same). What you heard is true: for the most part, it it not very smooth (especially in the lower gears) and can be slow to change. In some cases, it could be in the wrong gear, too. I can live with it because i am a relatively new driver and it's my first car :) but I probably would not recommend it, especially for experienced drivers.
They are but the thing is the gap in efficency between petrol and diesel has narrowed big time. A modern petrol now has many of the driving charecteristics of a diesel too. I have a Toyota Auris with a 1.2T petrol engine and it gets mid to high 50s on MPG going down the motorway and it does it quietly too. I know a diesel will easily get anywhere between 60-70mpg but I can live with being a few mpg lower on a run just for the refinement and smoothness of the engine and not having things like DPFs, Adblue and EGR valves and sensors that can break. In a city it makes little to no difference on fuel economy whether I drive diesel or petrol either in fact on shorter runs in colder weather the petrol is more efficent because it heats up quicker.
hey man i just want to tell i was terrified of driving and because if you in 6 months yesterday i was able to just pick up the keys and drive for the first time and all goes back to you and your videos i love them never stop foing them please ❤️❤️
I have a 2022 71-plate Corolla Touring Sports (estate), which I bought to use as a taxi. It has the previous Gen 4 hybrid system, with the 1.8 litre 122bhp engine. Today, so far, I've done 53 miles, and the mpg meter is reading 69.1mpg. The best fuel economy I've ever seen across a full shift is 74.7mpg, which was a day of long straight roads, with the worst being 48.7mpg on a very cold winter's day in stop start traffic with the heater and heated seats on. Typically, I don't often see less than 53mpg in the winter months and not usually less than 62mpg during the summer months on a combined cycle. If you can get over the noisy CVT gearbox when you accelerate, these Toyota hybrids are brilliant.
I just wanna say thanks, I recently passed my test with 0 faults, and a lot of it has to do with watching and learning from your videos. Even though I'm from Australia these videos were still incredibly useful and relevant for passing the test. You're a legend keep doing what you're doing.
@irvinewayne4086 they don't make them because they will be too economical. If that corolla hybrid had a 1.6hdi engine in it, it would be extremely economical, over 100mpg would be possible because diesel engine can handle heavy loads no problem. Hybrid petrol is a sad story, I already owned one in my channel.
@@fix-and-drive-diy-repairs Haha. No. Diesel hates short ways and cold starts - precisely what a petrol engine has to survive when paired with an electric engine. It would wear heavily during city runs and would likely fail under this duress soon after 100 000 km (especially the High-pressure Direct Injection - "HDI"). There is a reason behind the pidly 1.8 L petrol engine with just 98 hp - indirect petrol injection and very simple construction, no DPF, no turbo. Also, there is no need for the excessive torque of diesels, which would just need better and larger gearbox... Of course, the HDI + el. eng. might sound interesting for highways.... but... why the "+ el. eng.", then? TL;DR: There is a good reason behind pairing petrol and hybrid engines.
@Sunshrine2 I owned both toyota prius plug-in hybrid and citroen c4 1.6hdi. I am a taxi driver. Fuel cost is the number one expense I have to reduce to survive. Citroen is the best car I've ever used as a taxi not the hybrid. Check videos I made about my prius 5 years ago! The hybrid was a disaster for me. I even built a bigger battery with a tesla module to try to cut costs but it was useless. I am speaking from experience.
I own an 2012 Auris Hybrid and it is the best car I ever owned. It's very reliable, reasonably comfortable, easy to drive and extremely economical. Low maintenance combined with low running costs hits at least my spot... we have driven this car across Europe and it has 240.000 km on the clock and I use it as a daily driver to work and back. Little to no problems at all. It's on its second set of brakes, first hybrid battery, had to change the AC cooler last year and a stabi rod on the suspension and that's it. Rust is no issue so far and the car is holding up pretty good for its age and mileage. Fuel consumption is around 4 to 4.7 liters per 100km depending on the road conditions. In the city one can achieve figures below 3.5l/100km, on country roads around 4.2l/100km and.on a motorway app 5.5l 30:22 /100km. I will drive this car until it dies on me, no need for something else and my next car is either a corolla 1.8 or a RAV4 hybrid.
My 1997 Peugeot 306 1.9 TDLX has a smidge over half a tank of diesel remaining, after I brimmed it literally to the very top of the neck last time and has done 384 miles on almost 6.6 gallons. That's 58 MPG, all local, for shopping etc. The only minus aspect is road tax of £325 a year, which is an increase of £30 over last year. The car weighs about 1135 kg. The only evap worry is from my sweating forehead, as it's a non air con car.
Then you should know the 306's fuel tank.. first half lasts for ages... the latter half... not so much! I averaged 56mpg in my 306 2.0 HDi over 100k miles (yep, you read that right) as fuel receipts were tracked due to business use.
@@khalidacosta7133 When standard, I only averaged 46 MPG but had a chap fettle the turbo wastegate, then fitted a freeflow air filter and exhaust, also turning up the main fuelling screw and winding back the low speed vacuum bladder compensator a bit at the same time. It's quite amazing how a turbo that kicks in at 1,500 instead of the OE setting of 2,200 RPM improved the economy. Not at constant full pelt, obviously. I dare say your HDi would've been even better if you'd had it remapped etc. I actually did have that done for my motorbike, couldn't do a home tune with that, but got an MPG boost from 42 to 48 MPG there. It does run about 4 degrees Centigrade hotter though, but there's no sign of lean burning on the plugs, so it shouldn't compromise longevity. Famous last words !
@@michaelarchangel1163 Most likely the turbo was set to kick in at 2200 rpm due to needing to meet emissions. Mechanical fueling means it can't adjust the fuelling as accurately and excess air produces more NOx. During the latter half of it's life, it was remapped to 120-130bhp :) Now got a 407 Coupe with the 2.0 HDi, I get 56mpg out of that stock... somehow for a 1.7 tonne barge!
@@khalidacosta7133 That's a very luxurious car you have there. Sadly, my garage is too small for more than a small car alongside the bike. I do have a Bosch fuel pump and ancillaries as spares and replacements for the Lucas, just in case diesel prices go through the roof and if I may wish to be able to get a veg oil conversion. All's good at the mo though and at 83,000 miles I'll leave it well alone. All the best to you.
I have a Toyota Corolla 1.8 hybrid . I bought it in September 2021 and I have found it to be very economical and also a great drive .I enjoyed watching this video . Thanks
This model of C4 did age quite well and was made for a good number of years. I had a brand new one as a rental car for my trip to Italy in 2015. It was a 1.6 diesel, but manual. Handled the trip very well, was comfortable on the longer trip and kept up with motorway traffic nicely, all whilst doing over 60mpg on the longer run between Rome and Venice. Great car.
Good to see the tests done with both types, and in particular the latest Corolla hybrid. I now run the current Yaris hybrid, which to a large degree is very similar, albeit smaller - better than the previous Yaris. The Corolla is made in Derby, with the engines in North Wales, whereas the Yaris is assembled in Valenciennes, northern France. Years ago, the last diesel I ran was a Honda Civic with the 1.6l engine, which was the most efficient one I had, at least for long runs. It did well at higher speeds, because it had lots of tweaks to drag down the aerodynamic resistance - even low ground clearance (not nice on rough surfaces, though), sealed doors, other minor items etc, and it had the Michelin “energy saver” tyres on. On account of all that, it just came under the zero road tax figure on test (when there was zero tax below 100 g/km, to encourage the use of modern diesel engines, in 2013). In round numbers, at higher speeds about two thirds of the resistance is down to air resistance, with the other third being down to wheel resistance, with that bit being variable with the tyre products. Thus the latter bit is more important at lower speeds. I often do day trips that are affected by the wind direction - east/west typically, which is quite noticeable on the trip meter display. So a 30 mph headwind at 70 mph is like 100 mph on a calm day. The best figure I had was with a named storm behind me one day! The confounding factor when comparing diesel with petrol thermal efficiency is, of course, the notably different thermal content of the two. It’s roughly 9.7 kWh/litre for E10 petrol, and 10.7 kWh/litre for diesel. Of course, the excise duty is per unit volume, not energy content, so the less we get, the more we pay (with VAT on top), although petrol is often a bit cheaper per litre than diesel, depending on the season.
I do think this was an excellent test Richard. Toyota really do prove they do an excellent job with their petrol hybrids, and its no wonder the Toyota Corolla, not just the estate but all the different body styles, are best selling cars worldwide. About the end of the video where you mentioned about channel 4 with the hybrids emitting more harmful gases than diesel is interesting to me too, and also I find some emissions regulations a bit strange. For example, my Ford, with a 2.0 diesel, is Euro 6, but unlike most Euro 6 diesels it doesn't use adblue. I was told by the dealer Ford was late to bringing adblue, but its strange to me how it's Euro 6 compliant. I dont know much about emissions and how they work much. I do care a lot about fuel economy, and there was one thing about the Corolla and Citroen. I don't know their drag coefficients, but sometimes longer, lower ground cars are usually better efficient than small hatchbacks, because they are more like a tear drop, than a box shape. I don't know if thats the case, but I just learned it from videos online by car channels and social media. Whats your thoughts? Loved your video by the way, its great
@@luckas1234321 it does make sense with a DPF, because my Ford has one, but I've found other cars with both DPF and adblue, including new Ford's. For example, I found VW used both to meet Euro 6. That's why I get a bit confused with Euro 6, and unlike petrols, Euro 6 is very strict for diesel, especially in ULEZ, because you only need a Euro 4 petrol car, or Euro 3 motorcycle, to be compliant. On the other hand, diesel has to be Euro 6.
@@josephmarsh8235I know the older Hyundai Ioniq is one of the most efficient EVs. It's a similar shape to a Toyota Prius. But it can do 150 miles with a 28kwh battery pack. The Nissan leaf does 104 miles with a 30kwh battery pack. The Ioniq 6 is supposed to be even more efficient. The Ioniq 5 is a hatchback and is less efficient then the original Ioniq.
@@micheals1992 makes sense. There could be a number of reasons, especially with weight, driving, tyre pressures, batteries, engines and more. I just learnt a lot online through car channels like Donut Media, Carwow, Top Gear and my favourite online mechanic Scotty Kilmer.
Toyota Hybrids are very efficient and reliable. That's why virtually every Uber etc car is a Toyota Hybrid. Other car manufacturers are not nearly so good. As you pointed out there are various forms of 'Hybrid' technology and I think that Dispatches Documentary may have been looking at some of the less efficient cars on the market that don't perform as claimed.
Yep! Only the DC/DC convertor tends to break during the warranty period. Mine broke too on my ~5 year old Corolla Hybrid with ~90k km, but got fixed for free at the dealer. It's a 2k Euro component excluding labor though haha.
That peugeot-citroen 1.5L diesel engine was a marvel of efficiency. I owned the previous C4 model (the coupe one): coupled with the insane aero and light weight it had excellent fuel economy especially on the motorway. Pity that the 90hp version didn't have a sixth gear.
Diesal engines are usually more efficient in lower gears ,for example, in 30 mph zone, you would be in 4th gear in a diesal but be 6th gear for petrol.
1.6 liter turbo for my case. I drove peugeot 208 in my town, having a lot of elevations and heavy traffic. Stop and go including the huge capacity to start the engine again without hitting the battery, I was so impressed on its insane level of efficiency. I miss it but I moved on to Clio mk 4 because it's the only option I can have in this crazy Hyundai's kindom.
Thank you for this test! Nearly all my journeys are ‘country road’ and you are the first person to inform me how a full hybrid compares with a diesel. REALLY interesting!
I have a 2013 Lexus GS450h with an older version on Toyotas hybrid system, it amazes me how good on fuel it is. Even though it is still a 3.5 V6 i can easily manage high 40s on a run, ive even seen over 50mpg on a steady run.
The trip computer on my car is always 100% accurate. Because it doesn't have a trip computer. I just work out the economy myself from the pump and miles. (well actually Fuelly does that for me but...)
That's a really good in-depth review of Toyota's Hybrid system VS diesel * One thing worth mentioning is that diesel cars is not ideal for people who looking for do short journeys or drive it in cities as the DPF system will get clogged* it's best for long journeys and motorways
Having just bought a brand new Hybrid Corolla I thought I would have a look at this video. I have now come across this reviewer quite a few times and find his information and presentation excellent.
Hi Ritchard Id love to see you do some diy car reapir and maintinace content on your other channel I can tell you are really enthusiatcic and knowledgable about cars and me and many others would love to see it!
I had a Citroen C3 1.4 diesel for over 17 years & traded it in for a new Suzuki 1.2 soft hybrid Ignis last March. They both did about 70 mpg. So what I want is a hybrid diesel so may get 100 mpg then 😁
Great experiment! I've a 160 mile commute to work and home, drive a 1.6TDI and always wondered would a hybrid be more economical. I was also considering an EV but feel driving a consistent 70 MPH for the majority of the journey would nearly cost me more than diesel. I feel diesel still has a place in modern transport for long distance.
Great video as usual Richard. I have a late 2012 Toyota Auris Hybrid, and even in this cold weather, I'm getting between 64 to 74 mpg. My commute to work is fairly short. But even on the open roads doing about 60 mph, I get well over 70 mpg, sometimes even over 80 mpg! I do have a very light foot though.
Congratulations for your video. As an owner of a Corolla 140H I completely agree with your comments. I love driving it in any condition as it always provides the best driving experience (for me) in terms of efficiency, response, etc.
It's my turn to say thank you for all the help from your videos! Passed today first time with 4 minors, thought for sure I'd failed haha, will continue to watch and learn!
My brother's Seat Leon from 2001 1.9tdi after chiptuning goes 3.6l/100km on a highway and I know it's a highway so revs are low but still that's really good
My previous car was a Vauxhall Insignia sports tourer ( Estate) 2.0 Diesel ( Manual Transmission ) and I regularly make a journey from Staffordshire to Norwich a distance of 175 miles and as long as I stayed within the speed limit I was able to get 66 mpg . I now have a Vauxhall Mokka 1.4 t petrol ( Automatic Transmission ) and doing the same journey I can only get 45 mpg .
Years ago I did something similar. My grandad brought is first hybrid it was a Toyota Prius 56 plate. My dad had a VW Bora tdi 130 sport. We found the Prius to be more economical around town but the bora was much more economical on a run. So it looks like it’s still the same as before you need to look at the type of driving you do and pick the type of car that suits your needs. Me and my wife have gone down to one car we did have a seat Altea 2.0tdi dsg and a Toyota Yaris 1.33 MMT We kept the Toyota because cheaper road tax around town the economy where most the driving is done the Toyota was more economical. A roads very similar it was only on long motorway journeys that the diesel would be a lot more economical and you were looking at nearly 20 mpg difference. But it’s rare to do such long trips.
Great bit of research, I did anticipate the results - One thing you didn't mention is the fact diesel is more expensive too so if you compare the running cost of those mpg the hybrid/diesel differential widens even further. Its then an open and shut case hybrid win.
That's a lovely car Richard! Your other half sounds a bit like me, I admit to being a nervous driver and used to let my other half do most of the driving especially the motorways. Just me now so I have to do it all, I don't want to be a nuisance to my Children they're all busy getting on with their lives, I'm not as bad as I was though.
Very interesting video - I’ve got a 2019 Kia Ceed diesel. Drive about 15,000 miles a year and it averages 60-65mpg on a run, possibly a bit more if driven very carefully. Modern hybrids can be good but are twice the price of a used diesel which you have to factor in
Interesting video Richard, thanks. I would expect the Corolla to handle better than the C4 based on the fact that the Corolla is 12 years younger than the C4. Also, even when new, the C4 was reportedly let down by its poor handling, according to the reviews of the time. As for the fuel effiency, back in 2015 I had a similar specced, but brand new C4, albeit with a manual gearbox. 1.6 e-HDi of some description. It averaged 64mpg when travelling between Rome and Venince. To be fair i thohtht it was a great car for the trip, the 1.6 diesel performed better then expected in terms of higher speed power delivery, and economy. My daily driver is a manual 2007 2.0 Mondeo Mk4 TDCi (euro 4) and on a long run it can hit about 61mpg, although this quickly drops to the low-mid 40s in other driving conditions. The Corolla hybrid system clearly did a great job, thanks in part to its CVT gearbox and the years of Toyota development. It seemed to handle the speed run down the country roads very well. 😊 How did you like the automatic C4? Again, I've heard its an automated manual and some claimed it wasn't that smooth.
I have used C4, 8 years old, 1.6 diesel, automatic. Nice ride. Really no big problems. Just regulary tires and oil (+filters) change. It has smooth transmission (not as cvt) and it's really enough fast and comfort ride most times. Handling is good but it is slightly prone to leaning in corners. Consumed about 4-5 lit even at higher speeds. It is not an expensive car and for that money it is a very good hatchback mid-ranger. Toyotas are much more expensive.
I agree. The speed limits appear quite different to where I live (Poland). The normal limit for "country roads" would be 90 kmh here, but that's mostly for somewhat wider roads with hard-shoulders and not in a proximity of human settlements. 60 mph feels really fast on a twisty, hilly road without a hard-shoulder. On the other hand, 110 kmh (70 mph) seems _very_ slow as the top speed you can drive with on a motorway! Although, one has to admit, that the British motorways _are_ different -- on ours, the slip roads are much more sparse.
@@barsorrroYes , that would be the same here in Sweden where the country roads are wider with hard shoulder. Whenever I do drive in England it usually takes a while to get used to the higher speeds on those narrow roads.
I really loved this one! I was unaware that you're an enthusiast because I've only seen your driver safety videos (And I love them too). Definitely going to follow your channel more closely for the quality content just like this!
We have a Honda Jazz Cross Hybrid. Excellent car, very relaxing drive with full aids and assists. We decided on it over the Corolla due to the larger interior space (especially the rear seats) although the boot isn’t the largest. Currently averaging around 65mpg on short runs, but has been upto 70 on longer country runs and down to 60 on motorway jaunts.
Hi from Australia. I have owned three generations of Toyota Prius( currently a gen 4). All have been utterly reliable, no major problems or repairs, regular maintenance only. Current one is six years old. None have required more than a set of tyres and the current one a 12 volt battery and wiper blades. Economy has continued to improve, now at 64 mpg (imperial). The emissions that diesel’s have that petrol hybrids don’t suffer from are Nitrogen Oxides(NOX). All Toyota hybrids according to tests conducted locally generate the absolute minimum of NOX which is 0.006 grams/ kilometre. NOX is a known carcinogen, in addition diesel emissions also contain high amounts of particulates which are the known cause of smog. Also every litre of diesel used in a vehicle produces more CO2. So the usage of hybrids is a positive contribution to air quality with stop-start also helping. Diesel usage produces ten times the NOX of petrol necessitating Adblue treatment which will still produce more NOX by a factor of two to ten times depending on the vehicle(trucks and SUV’s being the worst. By choice I will not buy a large vehicle of any kind if I have no use for it on a daily basis. I have run hybrids for twenty years and they have been the best choice for economy and as an ownership experience Also had a Honda CRZ hybrid and a Civic Type R so not totally devoid of enjoyment plus have a Mazda 3 skyactiv x mild hybrid. Another excellent car. Your videos are also clear well presented and thoughtful. Long may you continue. Cheers.
I do find the fuel consumption for the Toyota on the motorway quite disappointing. I drive about 38k miles a year and currently drive a Volvo XC60 T6 recharge (small battery). On motorways at 120-130 km/h it uses about 6.5l. In the UK for the long drive it was just above 6l/100km. That’s a difference of only about 1.2l/100km for a car that is considerably heavier, less aerodynamic and way more powerful. In the city and on secondary roads my consumption is lower, but there I use the PHEV advantage. And I am sure my V60 T6 will be better than the XC60. But all and all: the smaller Toyota isn’t that much more economical than a bigger, more comfortable car that is way more fun (and comfortable) to drive. Bigger engines can be efficient in the correct circumstances.
I got one myself. Going ~120-130km/h mine sits around 4.4L/100km. That's 47% more efficient than your Volvo. Most of my driving is during the daytime however, then the Dutch speed limit is 100km/h. At that speed, my average is ~3.6 liters/100km. The key point with Toyota's hybrid system is to not constantly drive it agressively. If you do so, economy takes a nose dive, especially at 120-130km/h.
I own a C-HR hybrid. Drove 2k on holiday. Mostly 120/130kph on the German autobahn. Real (not bc) consumption 4.8L/100km. Most important thing… no worries about ADAC…
I dont think its entirely fair that the dual carriageway/motorway is emptier in the hybrids test even if the speed is the same as when you're around traffic on a fast road like a dual carriageway or motorway it creates allot of turbulance and air movement in the direction of travel. Larger vehicles can also shield you from the full brunt of the wind. I know in my car gets about 65mpg at 60mph on an empty motorway, on a fairy busy but flowing motorway it can get 77mpg at 60mph.
The main reason why I chose to buy Toyota Prius (it was a single car on sale in a whole Montenegro country) instead of regular diesel europe cars (Citroens, VW, etc) is that I know it's VERY VERY reliable car. Toyota Prius has absolutely reliable transmission. There is nothing that can break or wear there. It has quite reliable engine that can easily last up to 500 000 km and more. And it's pretty efficient. If the road is straight, without mountains, then it can do up to 3.5L/100km on a highway.
They’re more expensive to run than EVs Understandably, many drivers complain of the high cost of switching to an EV, because the sticker price, or monthly payment, is higher than that of an equivalent diesel car. Used EVs are also still relatively rare. However, while switching to an EV seems expensive, it might not be as expensive as you think, when you take the total cost of ownership (TCO) into account. EVs have fewer moving parts, so repairs and maintenance are less expensive; charging an EV from your domestic tariff - even at recent high prices - is about half the cost of filling a tank with diesel; and demand for used EVs means that they command a relatively high resale value. Add those together and most owners will find that running an EV is, in fact, not as pricey as a diesel.
A few years ago, I was given a Ford Mondeo Vignale 2.0 Hybrid (Atkinson engine, non-plug in on 235 width tyres) which weighed 1650kg . I drove that to Manchester and back regularly. Best I achieved was hypermiling (56mph, gentle accel not to kick in engine, regen braking only) it and got 42.5 mpg. In my 2.0 diesel Peugeot 407 which also weighed 1650kg on 235 width tyres, I can do the same journey, at the same speed and get 65mpg. The Mondeo was about 10 years newer and with 100k less miles on the clock. Quite disappointed in the results!
@@dd9ag Please elaborate and provide proof... the private hire's in London are mostly Prius, which is a class down from the Mondeo (hence weighs less, closest competitor would be between the Focus and Fiesta). The Ford is a very attractive package, Atkinson engine, CVT gearbox and an excellent charging / use system allowing one pedal driving. Toyota will be more reliable...but that's not a metric I touched on.
@@khalidacosta7133 well the Toyota isn’t just more reliable it’s more economical as you proved. A lot seem to be Prius plus 7 seaters which are just as spacious as mondeos.
@@dd9ag I don't think you understand how car manufacturers operate platforms. The Mondeo is a platform above the Prius platform, which requires better NVH. This increases weight, decreasing fuel economy, amongst other things. It is irrelevant to speculate one has better fuel economy or not, based on what you "feel" and what taxi drivers in London use. The closest competitor, the Toyota Camry Hybrid has an official fuel economy of 53mpg. I'll stick with my diesel where I get 56mpg without a problem.
@@khalidacosta7133 oh sure i do, i get that the mondeo is a d segment car. The prius is arguably a c segment car so as you say the mondeo will be heavier and less fuel efficient. But i have a RAV 4 hybrid which is more efficient. It’s possible the mondeo is longer but it has similar space and refinement to a d segment car yet i get 50-60 mpg. The official mpg of the camry you quite is wltp, i bet the wltp of a mondeo is less. But anyway you were talking about a hybrid mondeo weren’t you?
Great video -- as always, impressive dilligence and methodic approach. Also, your narrative is clear, informative and straightforward, and yet it's very pleasant and engaging to listen to. Congratulations for the car -- it does look like a great, modern, advanced and very sensible market offer. I have nothing particularly wise to say about that, apparently rather sensationalist, documentary you mention towards the end of the video, but one may wonder why the petrol engines employed in hybrid-powered cars should produce more dangerous polution than other combustion engines. On the face of it, it doesn't make any sense, since in such setting the engine gets to work in its optimum rev range the most often, and engines, I believe, tend to produce less toxic exhaust (and one most efficiently dealt with by the catalytic converter) when they are at their optimum revs and load. So, unless the "trickery" involved in the Atkinson cycle may lead to different emission characteristics than those of a regular petrol engine (which, admittedly, it may), it would indeed appear quite incredible.
I feel like most concerns for hybrid emissions are based on times where you put your foot down and wake up a cold engine and have it deliver near full throttle without it warming up. Older cars used to run rich on startup but direct injection and heated O2 sensors probably minimise this a lot. + I think some hybrid cars preheat the engine.. Hopefully reduces any engine wear from cold thrashing.
Great video. Real world scenarios like you’ve done here give the real world driver a more realistic picture. Of course, keeping the Citroen rather than buying the Toyota would save a lot of money. I wonder if a manual diesel Citroen would be even more economical. That’s probably another video!
In 2015 I had a brand new C4 1.6 HDi, the same shape as this one, but it was a 6 speed manual. On a run between Rome and Venice, it hit just over 62mpg which isn't bad considering the motorway was relatively twisty, with long gradients. The only time I really had to stop was to pay tolls and the start stop system kicked in without fail every time.
Buying a new car is not cheaper than a similar 10 year old car. The manual will probably be worse as it doesn't have the micro hybrid system and this auto is still a manual gearbox, just with a robot changing gear. It will come down to how it is driven.
Now, this is just the amount of fuel. In our country diesel is cheaper than petrol, so it almost evens out if calculated in money instead of liters. On top of that, the older diesel is much less capital lying on the road, so financially, the diesel is far better off. A stronger version of this diesel engine would have had a better torque and thus an even better mileage.
12 year old Diesel ( with 136k miles on the clock) vs brand new Hybrid. OMG. And yet not a lot of difference...apart from their current purchase prices approx. 2k vs 32k! The old banger still running good, but not very clean for sure. Next time please compare the 23 cars for more relevant result. Cheers
If You have a little interest in saving fuel the most efficient way of moving the Toyota hybrid is to coast, its very simple because all You have to do is to feather the accelerator so the car is close to freewheeling. You don't have to do anything else, your brake and stearing servo:s are electric and functions normally and the engine is shut of so there is no idling. You dont have to take this to any extreme, If You just keep it as a mind set and apply it over time to any degree when it's appropriat Your gas mileage will improve. It's not for everyone but I personally find it natural and satisfying.
I’ve had a 70 reg Corolla Design spec from new. It has now covered 62k the total average is 59.4 mpg however, my boot is always full of work tools etc. this figure will lower during the winter months and increase as we approach the summer. It also has the adaptive cruise as shown that works really well in traffic.
Also if you own a car with a turbo. You should let the car idol for 30 seconds before turning the engine off. This allows the turbo spool to fully settle and allow oil to remain there
somewhat different now with start /stop tech... if you park your car and then engine turns off for the start/stop function, you can just turn the engine off.... if it doesn't, let it idle as you say..
Bought a Corolla estate early this year to replace a Honda Civic Diesel. I live in rural ireland and am comfortably averaging 4l/100km(~70mpg), you do have to learn how to get the best from the hybrid system - there is an energy flow screen which shows when the engine/battery or both are driving the wheels but much more importantly also shows when you are recovering charge back into the battery, teaches you to let the recovery system do the breaking on approach to junctions etc. Service costs and frequency are a big factor counting against diesels now - to meet the latest standards oil changes need to be more frequent and pushes the costs in favour of the hybrids. In terms of hybrid emissions in urban areas - where I live most of the driving in the small towns and villages is in electric mode - zero.
With regards to emissions there's a massive difference between Cat 5 and Cat 6 diesel. Also, it's a pity you didn't compare the new hybrid with a diesel that wasn't 12 years old. My only experience of driving a mild hybrid was an XC40 that returned around 25mpg! So I bought a diesel that returns 65mpg.
It would be also interesting to compare things such as service costs and reliability. For example Toyotas are known to be bullet proof, unlike Citroen that doesn't have as good reputation on reliability long term. Hybrids do not have any big maintenance works other than various fluid changes and health-checkup for the hybrid system (including battery).
Diesel can't be beat for long motorway trips up n down country at constant speeds that's the main selling point, be interested see price the Toyota vs equal diesel
A much better comparison would have been to compare a 2023 diesel to the Corolla while including the starting price of both cars to get a better idea of the economy.
Thank you for such an interesting video. I know that you would have checked the tire pressures on both cars before your tests, would be nice if you mentioned it. Also the level of the traction battery in the hybrid at the start and end of each test would indicate possible economy variance. The aircon for both cars would add more discrepancies as their operations are totally different. Maybe best to test with them off on a cool day when heating and cooling are not needed. Would love to see another economy test of the Corolla in the winter.
I drive a rav 4 hybrid awd 2020, get about 600-650 miles out of 49l e10 unleaded in summer. I coldest winter months can drop to about 520 miles out of the same amount of fuel. This will happen between about December and February.
@@dd9ag 😄😄 good one! I had gallons in my head when I asked... 600-650 nautical miles would be awsome, however not to be expected. 600-650 miles is still impressive for a SUV!
I'm driving diesel Golf , this is my 4th diesel now (before that I was driving petrols), and all I have to say is this is the last diesel for me , no more sir. From now on it will be some Japanese naturaly aspirated petrol...
The biggest problem is people don't drive a hybrid correctly to achieve great mpg you need good forward planning and to break early and steadily to get the best out of the regen and to accelerate within the eco band, if its in electric mode accelerate gently and when the engine kicks on accelerate more rapidly to help reduce engine run time
Did you drive Toyota as any other vehicle or did you use any technics how to make the consumption even lower? For example, if you raise up the gas pedal swiftly, the engine shuts off immediately and you get more electric drive. Those rolling country roads are perfect for that. Also there's a marker in the economy meter to identify when the gas engine kicks in. That's the "ECO" marker half way between CHARGE and POWER. Use petrol engine to accelerate a little bit over speed and then raise up the gas pedal for 0,5s and then try to keep the econymy meter just under the ECO to stay as long as possible in EV drive. You'll be able to cut 20% more of your consumpition, if you know the tricks.
A Toyota Yaris Hybrid 2016 model. No car aficionado we have use it from new, seamless transition from electric to petrol power mode. About 60 mpg in a Cornish location. Our last car, last motorcycle a couple of years back. Diesel Kia before that, particulates guilt ended that relationship. A personal transition.
Diesels are better if you can take the DPF off! More torque, better economy, better soundproofing, faster midrange acceleration. Low revs means more relaxed to drive. Lower CO2 than a petrol. Phased out to find new ways of taxing people even if better for the environment. With high MPG it meant less fuel bought, so less tax.
'elephant race up ahead' hahahah! That's a good one, I better start using that. My term for this is a 31-32...one dude doing 32mph overtaking another doing 31 mph
I think the Documentry you are on about Richard, taken into account the emmisions of building a car Diesel/Electric car, then running them for life expectancy of a normal car, then compared the difference, and it wasn't on the first set of batteries for the electric car due to the manufacturing process. using petrol automatics in a week, and no hybrids, it was costing me more than the diesel C4 Picasso automatic I had, so for the hybrid to have kept up, then some serious battery power advantage, as the hire cars I was using were 23 plate, and they couldn't keep up with my old car pound for pound was nearly double. the electric car I got is about comparable with the diesel, but that is because I got to pay stupid prices for electric at the service stations until I get a discount card.
This hybrid is far more economical than a typical petrol car as the engine is able to run more efficiently. The battery's purpose is to allow the engine to be more efficient.
I went from a 2016 diesel Kia Pro_Cee'd to a 2021 Corolla Hybrid 2 years ago. While the Kia achieved the same fuel economy as the Toyota, it's all done in a more relaxed manner. It's also nicer inside, more comfortable and more fun to drive when the roads get twisty. I do argue that the Mk2 Pro_Cee'd is the best looking hatchback of the last decade though.
@@ofah6378 on average about 4.8l\100km. That does deteriorate if there's a lot of motorway driving, but only by a half litre or so. Town driving alone brings it to about 4l.
A couple of other factors, diesel is roughly 20 pence a gallon more expensive, also in cold weather the heating in petrol cars kicks in quicker than diesel cars something my partner always complain about on short journeys. I’ve just purchased a 2022/03 Hyundai hybrid and observing the display it appears to use the battery power a lot of the time. I’ve just parted with my 2013 Citroen Picasso 1.6 diesel with 107,000 miles on the clock and apart from the usual things that wear out the serpentine belt and tensioners were the only faulty part that needed replacing.
20 deg C in a car is too low, aren't you freezing? I put mine at around 25 degC both in winter (outside temp is around 0 degC sometimes goes below) and in summer (outside temp is around 35 sometimes 40 degC)
Are you female? It's pretty well established that women like warmer environments than men. I personally hate temperatures above 20C. I guess it is my metabolism. GF's treat me as a human hot water bottle / electric blanket in the winter 😉
@@Drew-Dastardly No, I'm a man but it doesn't matter because 20°C is low. But I think that because on UK there is not so hot like in my country (Serbia) so we like it little bit wormer. And it is not healthy to have very big temperature difference between outside and inside. Max 5-10°C difference. For example this days temps here are around 35°C so it is OK to set AC to 25°C and thst is max. If you set it to lower than that imagine the shock when you go outside on 40°C in the street (it is 35°C in shades).
I will say in the UK it is not just the temperature, but especially the humidity. We are an island and it gets very humid which is horrible. A dry heat can be 10C hotter than a wet heat and be fine.
@@Drew-Dastardly It is humid in Serbia too, maybe not so much like where you are but it is not dry like in Egipt :D , but we are used to that kind of climate like you are to your's. Back to topic, car will use more fuel if you set the AC to the very low temps in summer, but it will use the same amount of fuel to heat in winter. EVs, in the other hand, will use more energy to heat in winter then to cool in summer ;)
Just a point to note - Toyota's claiming that with the new generation model, the 2.0 liter version is more economical than the 1.8 liter, at a figure of 64.1 MPG and 62.7 MPG respectively for identical spec models, in addition to the bigger engine apparently having less emissions.
Yes but only if its a Toyota hybrid since they are the best at making reliable hybrids and reliable cars in general, a Mercedes Diesel or VW Diesel is a very good choice too. Toyota vs Citroen is an automatic win for Toyota.
True for the UK, but not for Autobahn driving in Germany. If you ever blasted a modern Diesel over a hilly Autobahn, you are never, ever going for anything else. Such a treat; provided it's 5 am in summertime. Still Toyota's technology is very appealing e.g. for toxi driving in cities.
As a rule of thumb, the more a driving environment requires you to use the brakes, the greater the benefit of a hybrid. Nearly all the hybrid economy gain is from regen braking. It's why taxi drivers love them.
Precisely this ^^ Otherwise, the fuel economy is far worse!!
no it isnt. The reason is at low city speeds and lots of starting and stopping the electric motor is far far more efficient. the regen is just the icing on the cake.
So, this would be true for a mild hybrid where the battery is only charged from the wheels. A Toyota hybrid has several tricks it uses to help you save petrol
1. Atkinson cycle engine - gives better fuel economy but less responsive engine, so you need to add something to increase responsiveness e.g. Mazda used a supercharger when they made an Atkinson cycle car, Toyota use an electric motor for this purpose
2. The battery is charged using the engine at more efficient revs. We all know petrol cars are more efficient at higher than lower speeds. A Toyota hybrids stores energy at that higher efficiency for use at lower speeds or power output levels (below 30 hp)
3. Never idles - You'll never catch your hybrid idling if the engine is running it's for a reason - it's either a) warming itself up, b) warming you up, c) charging the battery or d) driving the wheels
4. Discourages rapid driving - they tend to feel better when you're driving moderately and not flooring it, this also helps save petrol. Some of them will even give you a score for how economically you have driven.
5. Fast warm up - electric motors control the coolant flow and there is an egr system to help the engine get up to temperature quickly
6. Regen braking - very noticeable down a long hill just how much energy you can get from regen braking. If you fill the battery going down a hill, the car will automatically switch over to engine braking and will use extra electric power after the hill to get the battery down to 80% quickly - it doesn't want to sit at 100% for long
Hope this helps
Gradient plays a big part. You’ll actually get best economy on a Toyota hybrid by not braking. You can’t capture all the energy you lose so you’re better off keeping it.
Unfortunately the vast majority of drivers do the vast majority of mileage on motorways. In this case the hybrid is lugging the extra weight of a battery. Even in town the regen is offset by lugging the extra weight. Then there is the extra manufacturing cost and complexity. The biggest economy benefit of hybrids is on paper.
2023hybrid euro6 vs 2011 diesel euro5? Fair comparison? Next time, compare same age!
1.6hdi, absolutely amazing economy. I have 2 now.
As a taxi driver, I owned both prius plug in and 1.6hdi. My verdict, as a taxi driver, Citroen is better.
Cheap to buy, cheap to maintain, good economy(800 miles from a tank). All this is in my channel.
I just paid less than 5k for a 2016 Citroen c4 grand Picasso 1.6hdi. A 2016 toyota prius/auris/corola hybrid would cost ~£15k~£20k. It doesn't make any sense for me!
I am staying with Citroen until 2035 or later.
Youre right but thats a bad comparison too, if u wanna do a hybrid vs diesel u gotta do it with the same version of the car, also theres no need to compare the plug-in hybrid, no one wants that, people coming from petrol and diesel would much prefer a mild or full hybrid rather than a plugin where they dont have or dont want to be bothered with the charging and theres nothing a plugin can do that a full hybrid cant, it just has extra range but much bigger batteries and weight and is MORE expensive to own and maintain, so a fair comparison would be something like a the new Dacia Duster 1.2L Turbo 3 cylinder Mild Hybrid, the 1.6L NA 4 cylinder Full Hybrid and the usual 1.5 dCi that is probably only available in Morocco, but u get the point...
Just passed my test this weekend! Thanks for the videos. Took me four tries so dont give up people!
That's fantastic news! Thank you for watching and congratulations on passing!
Taxi drivers get around 50mpg because of heavy loads, rushing, and get even less mpg if they do a lot of airport runs!
Hybrids don't like steep hills and heavy loads!
My partner has a 2019 corolla which she upgraded to from a 2008 diesel avensis. I have a 2012 prius. Absolutely everything you say in this video is true! Or at least I can say my experience matches yours exactly. I can also add that in the case of the Prius it’s very nice (and weird) to own an 11 year old car that still has 4 year’s warranty on the hybrid system. I always look forward to your videos, and this was an especially good one, thanks!
Nice video, thanks Richard. As an owner of a 2013 citroen of the same model and engine I can confirm that it's super economical on highway at sustained speeds
Is yours also an automatic? How do you like it? Is it smooth? Genuinely curious as I've heard some say they're an automated manual and not too smooth..
@RikAindow mine is the "robotic" one - a manual gearbox equipped with robotic parts (I think Richard's car in the video has got the same).
What you heard is true: for the most part, it it not very smooth (especially in the lower gears) and can be slow to change. In some cases, it could be in the wrong gear, too. I can live with it because i am a relatively new driver and it's my first car :) but I probably would not recommend it, especially for experienced drivers.
@oleksiikovalenko8544 thanks for replying. I still think they're a nice looking car.
@RikAindow I totally agree with you - the design was actually one of the reasons why I bought it :)
They are but the thing is the gap in efficency between petrol and diesel has narrowed big time. A modern petrol now has many of the driving charecteristics of a diesel too. I have a Toyota Auris with a 1.2T petrol engine and it gets mid to high 50s on MPG going down the motorway and it does it quietly too. I know a diesel will easily get anywhere between 60-70mpg but I can live with being a few mpg lower on a run just for the refinement and smoothness of the engine and not having things like DPFs, Adblue and EGR valves and sensors that can break. In a city it makes little to no difference on fuel economy whether I drive diesel or petrol either in fact on shorter runs in colder weather the petrol is more efficent because it heats up quicker.
These videos are great, very in-depth. Congrats to the GF on the Corolla, it's a nice car, hope it serves her well
Thank you!
hey man i just want to tell i was terrified of driving and because if you in 6 months yesterday i was able to just pick up the keys and drive for the first time and all goes back to you and your videos i love them never stop foing them please ❤️❤️
I have a 2022 71-plate Corolla Touring Sports (estate), which I bought to use as a taxi. It has the previous Gen 4 hybrid system, with the 1.8 litre 122bhp engine. Today, so far, I've done 53 miles, and the mpg meter is reading 69.1mpg. The best fuel economy I've ever seen across a full shift is 74.7mpg, which was a day of long straight roads, with the worst being 48.7mpg on a very cold winter's day in stop start traffic with the heater and heated seats on. Typically, I don't often see less than 53mpg in the winter months and not usually less than 62mpg during the summer months on a combined cycle. If you can get over the noisy CVT gearbox when you accelerate, these Toyota hybrids are brilliant.
and the 2litre is quite quick aswell :) quite fun to drive
I just wanna say thanks, I recently passed my test with 0 faults, and a lot of it has to do with watching and learning from your videos. Even though I'm from Australia these videos were still incredibly useful and relevant for passing the test. You're a legend keep doing what you're doing.
That's fantastic news! Thank you for watching and congratulations on passing!
I want a diesel hybrid! It will have a combined 3.5l/100km!!! @@ConquerDriving
@irvinewayne4086 they don't make them because they will be too economical. If that corolla hybrid had a 1.6hdi engine in it, it would be extremely economical, over 100mpg would be possible because diesel engine can handle heavy loads no problem. Hybrid petrol is a sad story, I already owned one in my channel.
@@fix-and-drive-diy-repairs Haha. No. Diesel hates short ways and cold starts - precisely what a petrol engine has to survive when paired with an electric engine. It would wear heavily during city runs and would likely fail under this duress soon after 100 000 km (especially the High-pressure Direct Injection - "HDI").
There is a reason behind the pidly 1.8 L petrol engine with just 98 hp - indirect petrol injection and very simple construction, no DPF, no turbo. Also, there is no need for the excessive torque of diesels, which would just need better and larger gearbox...
Of course, the HDI + el. eng. might sound interesting for highways.... but... why the "+ el. eng.", then? TL;DR: There is a good reason behind pairing petrol and hybrid engines.
@Sunshrine2 I owned both toyota prius plug-in hybrid and citroen c4 1.6hdi. I am a taxi driver. Fuel cost is the number one expense I have to reduce to survive. Citroen is the best car I've ever used as a taxi not the hybrid.
Check videos I made about my prius 5 years ago! The hybrid was a disaster for me. I even built a bigger battery with a tesla module to try to cut costs but it was useless. I am speaking from experience.
I own an 2012 Auris Hybrid and it is the best car I ever owned. It's very reliable, reasonably comfortable, easy to drive and extremely economical. Low maintenance combined with low running costs hits at least my spot... we have driven this car across Europe and it has 240.000 km on the clock and I use it as a daily driver to work and back. Little to no problems at all. It's on its second set of brakes, first hybrid battery, had to change the AC cooler last year and a stabi rod on the suspension and that's it. Rust is no issue so far and the car is holding up pretty good for its age and mileage. Fuel consumption is around 4 to 4.7 liters per 100km depending on the road conditions. In the city one can achieve figures below 3.5l/100km, on country roads around 4.2l/100km and.on a motorway app 5.5l 30:22 /100km. I will drive this car until it dies on me, no need for something else and my next car is either a corolla 1.8 or a RAV4 hybrid.
My 1997 Peugeot 306 1.9 TDLX has a smidge over half a tank of diesel remaining, after I brimmed it literally to the very top of the neck last time and has done 384 miles on almost 6.6 gallons. That's 58 MPG, all local, for shopping etc. The only minus aspect is road tax of £325 a year, which is an increase of £30 over last year. The car weighs about 1135 kg. The only evap worry is from my sweating forehead, as it's a non air con car.
Then you should know the 306's fuel tank.. first half lasts for ages... the latter half... not so much! I averaged 56mpg in my 306 2.0 HDi over 100k miles (yep, you read that right) as fuel receipts were tracked due to business use.
@@khalidacosta7133 When standard, I only averaged 46 MPG but had a chap fettle the turbo wastegate, then fitted a freeflow air filter and exhaust, also turning up the main fuelling screw and winding back the low speed vacuum bladder compensator a bit at the same time. It's quite amazing how a turbo that kicks in at 1,500 instead of the OE setting of 2,200 RPM improved the economy. Not at constant full pelt, obviously. I dare say your HDi would've been even better if you'd had it remapped etc. I actually did have that done for my motorbike, couldn't do a home tune with that, but got an MPG boost from 42 to 48 MPG there. It does run about 4 degrees Centigrade hotter though, but there's no sign of lean burning on the plugs, so it shouldn't compromise longevity. Famous last words !
@@michaelarchangel1163 Most likely the turbo was set to kick in at 2200 rpm due to needing to meet emissions. Mechanical fueling means it can't adjust the fuelling as accurately and excess air produces more NOx. During the latter half of it's life, it was remapped to 120-130bhp :) Now got a 407 Coupe with the 2.0 HDi, I get 56mpg out of that stock... somehow for a 1.7 tonne barge!
@@khalidacosta7133 That's a very luxurious car you have there. Sadly, my garage is too small for more than a small car alongside the bike. I do have a Bosch fuel pump and ancillaries as spares and replacements for the Lucas, just in case diesel prices go through the roof and if I may wish to be able to get a veg oil conversion. All's good at the mo though and at 83,000 miles I'll leave it well alone. All the best to you.
Just open the window, free old school air con !
One of our 1.4 tdci cars gets around 64 MPG doing 30 miles a day on a range of speed limit roads. It is manual, no DPF or stop start either.
That is so nutty. I have to drive the 2nd gen prius like a nerd to keep it over 50mpg
Bet the emissions would trigger the ulez cameras
What car?
@@yowhaatsupProbably Ford Fiesta.
@@PhoenixsWorldVideos the hybrids have come along way though since..
I have a Toyota Corolla 1.8 hybrid . I bought it in September 2021 and I have found it to be very economical and also a great drive .I enjoyed watching this video . Thanks
The Citroen is old but still looks modern next to the Toyota. I loved that Citroen.
Citroën looks more modern? Are you serious
@@msg9434 I didn't say MORE modern. I just said it still looks modern. As in it doesn't look like it's 12 years old.
This model of C4 did age quite well and was made for a good number of years. I had a brand new one as a rental car for my trip to Italy in 2015. It was a 1.6 diesel, but manual. Handled the trip very well, was comfortable on the longer trip and kept up with motorway traffic nicely, all whilst doing over 60mpg on the longer run between Rome and Venice. Great car.
It’s French, I’d rather walk!
Your partner got a nice upgrade!
I think so too!
It's a 2023 car. Can't go wrong😊 but I'm glad you chose Toyota. Best upgrade for economy and engine
Absolutely brilliant real world comparison, thank you for the effort and clarity Richard.
The intro reminded me of the old top gear 🤣
Thanks for helping me pass in February!!
Good to see the tests done with both types, and in particular the latest Corolla hybrid. I now run the current Yaris hybrid, which to a large degree is very similar, albeit smaller - better than the previous Yaris. The Corolla is made in Derby, with the engines in North Wales, whereas the Yaris is assembled in Valenciennes, northern France.
Years ago, the last diesel I ran was a Honda Civic with the 1.6l engine, which was the most efficient one I had, at least for long runs. It did well at higher speeds, because it had lots of tweaks to drag down the aerodynamic resistance - even low ground clearance (not nice on rough surfaces, though), sealed doors, other minor items etc, and it had the Michelin “energy saver” tyres on. On account of all that, it just came under the zero road tax figure on test (when there was zero tax below 100 g/km, to encourage the use of modern diesel engines, in 2013).
In round numbers, at higher speeds about two thirds of the resistance is down to air resistance, with the other third being down to wheel resistance, with that bit being variable with the tyre products. Thus the latter bit is more important at lower speeds. I often do day trips that are affected by the wind direction - east/west typically, which is quite noticeable on the trip meter display. So a 30 mph headwind at 70 mph is like 100 mph on a calm day. The best figure I had was with a named storm behind me one day!
The confounding factor when comparing diesel with petrol thermal efficiency is, of course, the notably different thermal content of the two. It’s roughly 9.7 kWh/litre for E10 petrol, and 10.7 kWh/litre for diesel. Of course, the excise duty is per unit volume, not energy content, so the less we get, the more we pay (with VAT on top), although petrol is often a bit cheaper per litre than diesel, depending on the season.
I have yaris 2015, hybrid. Tbh feels like worst car I had.
I do think this was an excellent test Richard. Toyota really do prove they do an excellent job with their petrol hybrids, and its no wonder the Toyota Corolla, not just the estate but all the different body styles, are best selling cars worldwide. About the end of the video where you mentioned about channel 4 with the hybrids emitting more harmful gases than diesel is interesting to me too, and also I find some emissions regulations a bit strange. For example, my Ford, with a 2.0 diesel, is Euro 6, but unlike most Euro 6 diesels it doesn't use adblue. I was told by the dealer Ford was late to bringing adblue, but its strange to me how it's Euro 6 compliant. I dont know much about emissions and how they work much. I do care a lot about fuel economy, and there was one thing about the Corolla and Citroen. I don't know their drag coefficients, but sometimes longer, lower ground cars are usually better efficient than small hatchbacks, because they are more like a tear drop, than a box shape. I don't know if thats the case, but I just learned it from videos online by car channels and social media. Whats your thoughts? Loved your video by the way, its great
I don't know the drag co efficency of the Citroen but the Corolla estate and hatchback have the same.
To my understanding, the Fords use DPF (diesel particulate filters) to keep the emissions standards in line with euro 6.
@@luckas1234321 it does make sense with a DPF, because my Ford has one, but I've found other cars with both DPF and adblue, including new Ford's. For example, I found VW used both to meet Euro 6. That's why I get a bit confused with Euro 6, and unlike petrols, Euro 6 is very strict for diesel, especially in ULEZ, because you only need a Euro 4 petrol car, or Euro 3 motorcycle, to be compliant. On the other hand, diesel has to be Euro 6.
@@josephmarsh8235I know the older Hyundai Ioniq is one of the most efficient EVs. It's a similar shape to a Toyota Prius. But it can do 150 miles with a 28kwh battery pack. The Nissan leaf does 104 miles with a 30kwh battery pack. The Ioniq 6 is supposed to be even more efficient. The Ioniq 5 is a hatchback and is less efficient then the original Ioniq.
@@micheals1992 makes sense. There could be a number of reasons, especially with weight, driving, tyre pressures, batteries, engines and more. I just learnt a lot online through car channels like Donut Media, Carwow, Top Gear and my favourite online mechanic Scotty Kilmer.
Toyota Hybrids are very efficient and reliable. That's why virtually every Uber etc car is a Toyota Hybrid. Other car manufacturers are not nearly so good. As you pointed out there are various forms of 'Hybrid' technology and I think that Dispatches Documentary may have been looking at some of the less efficient cars on the market that don't perform as claimed.
Yep! Only the DC/DC convertor tends to break during the warranty period. Mine broke too on my ~5 year old Corolla Hybrid with ~90k km, but got fixed for free at the dealer. It's a 2k Euro component excluding labor though haha.
In Spain Uber is about 70% hyundai ioniq, 29% corolla and 1% Fiat Tipo and Ford Mondeo
That peugeot-citroen 1.5L diesel engine was a marvel of efficiency. I owned the previous C4 model (the coupe one): coupled with the insane aero and light weight it had excellent fuel economy especially on the motorway. Pity that the 90hp version didn't have a sixth gear.
Diesal engines are usually more efficient in lower gears ,for example, in 30 mph zone, you would be in 4th gear in a diesal but be 6th gear for petrol.
1.6 liter turbo for my case. I drove peugeot 208 in my town, having a lot of elevations and heavy traffic. Stop and go including the huge capacity to start the engine again without hitting the battery, I was so impressed on its insane level of efficiency. I miss it but I moved on to Clio mk 4 because it's the only option I can have in this crazy Hyundai's kindom.
Thank you for this test! Nearly all my journeys are ‘country road’ and you are the first person to inform me how a full hybrid compares with a diesel.
REALLY interesting!
I have a 2013 Lexus GS450h with an older version on Toyotas hybrid system, it amazes me how good on fuel it is. Even though it is still a 3.5 V6 i can easily manage high 40s on a run, ive even seen over 50mpg on a steady run.
Been enjoying these types of videos, excited to watch!
The trip computer on my car is always 100% accurate. Because it doesn't have a trip computer. I just work out the economy myself from the pump and miles. (well actually Fuelly does that for me but...)
That's a really good in-depth review of Toyota's Hybrid system VS diesel *
One thing worth mentioning is that diesel cars is not ideal for people who looking for do short journeys or drive it in cities as the DPF system will get clogged* it's best for long journeys and motorways
Great video . From experience of new cars, after 3000, 5000 miles the economy should improve as the car beds in.
Having just bought a brand new Hybrid Corolla I thought I would have a look at this video. I have now come across this reviewer quite a few times and find his information and presentation excellent.
That is phenomenal. This was more informative than many others on this medium. A thoughtful and informative spiel. Great huge thumbs Up 👍👍👍
Very useful video . I will keep my diesel since i drive 90% of the time on highway
Hi Ritchard Id love to see you do some diy car reapir and maintinace content on your other channel I can tell you are really enthusiatcic and knowledgable about cars and me and many others would love to see it!
Tuesday 27th June - 6 weeks and 6 days ago! The early days of summer, I miss those days. 😀
I had a Citroen C3 1.4 diesel for over 17 years & traded it in for a new Suzuki 1.2 soft hybrid Ignis last March. They both did about 70 mpg. So what I want is a hybrid diesel so may get 100 mpg then 😁
Great experiment! I've a 160 mile commute to work and home, drive a 1.6TDI and always wondered would a hybrid be more economical. I was also considering an EV but feel driving a consistent 70 MPH for the majority of the journey would nearly cost me more than diesel. I feel diesel still has a place in modern transport for long distance.
The corolla will be my next car. How it can just sip fuel is incredible.
Great video as usual Richard. I have a late 2012 Toyota Auris Hybrid, and even in this cold weather, I'm getting between 64 to 74 mpg. My commute to work is fairly short. But even on the open roads doing about 60 mph, I get well over 70 mpg, sometimes even over 80 mpg! I do have a very light foot though.
Congratulations for your video. As an owner of a Corolla 140H I completely agree with your comments. I love driving it in any condition as it always provides the best driving experience (for me) in terms of efficiency, response, etc.
Thanks for putting the "L/100Km" info. That's what we use here in Portugal.
It's my turn to say thank you for all the help from your videos! Passed today first time with 4 minors, thought for sure I'd failed haha, will continue to watch and learn!
That's great to hear! Thank you for watching and congratulations on passing!
My brother's Seat Leon from 2001 1.9tdi after chiptuning goes 3.6l/100km on a highway and I know it's a highway so revs are low but still that's really good
My previous car was a Vauxhall Insignia sports tourer ( Estate) 2.0 Diesel ( Manual Transmission ) and I regularly make a journey from Staffordshire to Norwich a distance of 175 miles and as long as I stayed within the speed limit I was able to get 66 mpg .
I now have a Vauxhall Mokka 1.4 t petrol ( Automatic Transmission ) and doing the same journey I can only get 45 mpg .
I wanna congratulate you for the great choice of your new car, Toyota hybrids are unmatched
Years ago I did something similar. My grandad brought is first hybrid it was a Toyota Prius 56 plate.
My dad had a VW Bora tdi 130 sport.
We found the Prius to be more economical around town but the bora was much more economical on a run.
So it looks like it’s still the same as before you need to look at the type of driving you do and pick the type of car that suits your needs.
Me and my wife have gone down to one car we did have a seat Altea 2.0tdi dsg and a Toyota Yaris 1.33 MMT
We kept the Toyota because cheaper road tax around town the economy where most the driving is done the Toyota was more economical. A roads very similar it was only on long motorway journeys that the diesel would be a lot more economical and you were looking at nearly 20 mpg difference.
But it’s rare to do such long trips.
I prefer litres per hundred as a 20mpg difference at 50-70mpg is smaller than a 20mpg difference at 20-40mpg.
@@RennieAsh 20 mpg is 14.1 litres per 100
but then, if diesel is more expensive, wouldn't that negate the better mileage?
Still not enough to warrant buying one if you were doing lots of motorway miles.
If you do lots of town driving the hybrid wins hands down
Great bit of research, I did anticipate the results - One thing you didn't mention is the fact diesel is more expensive too so if you compare the running cost of those mpg the hybrid/diesel differential widens even further. Its then an open and shut case hybrid win.
That's a lovely car Richard! Your other half sounds a bit like me, I admit to being a nervous driver and used to let my other half do most of the driving especially the motorways. Just me now so I have to do it all, I don't want to be a nuisance to my Children they're all busy getting on with their lives, I'm not as bad as I was though.
Very interesting video - I’ve got a 2019 Kia Ceed diesel. Drive about 15,000 miles a year and it averages 60-65mpg on a run, possibly a bit more if driven very carefully. Modern hybrids can be good but are twice the price of a used diesel which you have to factor in
Fully agree with you opinion
Interesting video Richard, thanks.
I would expect the Corolla to handle better than the C4 based on the fact that the Corolla is 12 years younger than the C4. Also, even when new, the C4 was reportedly let down by its poor handling, according to the reviews of the time.
As for the fuel effiency, back in 2015 I had a similar specced, but brand new C4, albeit with a manual gearbox. 1.6 e-HDi of some description. It averaged 64mpg when travelling between Rome and Venince. To be fair i thohtht it was a great car for the trip, the 1.6 diesel performed better then expected in terms of higher speed power delivery, and economy.
My daily driver is a manual 2007 2.0 Mondeo Mk4 TDCi (euro 4) and on a long run it can hit about 61mpg, although this quickly drops to the low-mid 40s in other driving conditions.
The Corolla hybrid system clearly did a great job, thanks in part to its CVT gearbox and the years of Toyota development. It seemed to handle the speed run down the country roads very well. 😊
How did you like the automatic C4? Again, I've heard its an automated manual and some claimed it wasn't that smooth.
I have used C4, 8 years old, 1.6 diesel, automatic. Nice ride. Really no big problems. Just regulary tires and oil (+filters) change. It has smooth transmission (not as cvt) and it's really enough fast and comfort ride most times. Handling is good but it is slightly prone to leaning in corners. Consumed about 4-5 lit even at higher speeds. It is not an expensive car and for that money it is a very good hatchback mid-ranger. Toyotas are much more expensive.
Love the fact you already knew you were going to record the 2 car shot later yet mentioned it before haha
On similar narrow country roads here in Sweden the speed limit would be 70 kmh. Quite a difference compared to the UK. Much more fun in the UK.
I agree. The speed limits appear quite different to where I live (Poland). The normal limit for "country roads" would be 90 kmh here, but that's mostly for somewhat wider roads with hard-shoulders and not in a proximity of human settlements. 60 mph feels really fast on a twisty, hilly road without a hard-shoulder. On the other hand, 110 kmh (70 mph) seems _very_ slow as the top speed you can drive with on a motorway! Although, one has to admit, that the British motorways _are_ different -- on ours, the slip roads are much more sparse.
@@barsorrroYes , that would be the same here in Sweden where the country roads are wider with hard shoulder. Whenever I do drive in England it usually takes a while to get used to the higher speeds on those narrow roads.
Good job on using all common units of fuel consumption measurement 👍
I really loved this one! I was unaware that you're an enthusiast because I've only seen your driver safety videos (And I love them too).
Definitely going to follow your channel more closely for the quality content just like this!
Thank you for doing this very scientific and rigorous experiment.
We have a Honda Jazz Cross Hybrid. Excellent car, very relaxing drive with full aids and assists. We decided on it over the Corolla due to the larger interior space (especially the rear seats) although the boot isn’t the largest. Currently averaging around 65mpg on short runs, but has been upto 70 on longer country runs and down to 60 on motorway jaunts.
Hi from Australia. I have owned three generations of Toyota Prius( currently a gen 4). All have been utterly reliable, no major problems or repairs, regular maintenance only. Current one is six years old. None have required more than a set of tyres and the current one a 12 volt battery and wiper blades. Economy has continued to improve, now at 64 mpg (imperial). The emissions that diesel’s have that petrol hybrids don’t suffer from are Nitrogen Oxides(NOX). All Toyota hybrids according to tests conducted locally generate the absolute minimum of NOX which is 0.006 grams/ kilometre. NOX is a known carcinogen, in addition diesel emissions also contain high amounts of particulates which are the known cause of smog. Also every litre of diesel used in a vehicle produces more CO2. So the usage of hybrids is a positive contribution to air quality with stop-start also helping. Diesel usage produces ten times the NOX of petrol necessitating Adblue treatment which will still produce more NOX by a factor of two to ten times depending on the vehicle(trucks and SUV’s being the worst. By choice I will not buy a large vehicle of any kind if I have no use for it on a daily basis. I have run hybrids for twenty years and they have been the best choice for economy and as an ownership experience Also had a Honda CRZ hybrid and a Civic Type R so not totally devoid of enjoyment plus have a Mazda 3 skyactiv x mild hybrid. Another excellent car. Your videos are also clear well presented and thoughtful. Long may you continue. Cheers.
So as most electric cars don't have gears, does that mean if I pass my test in an electric car I can only drive automatics?
yes
Yes, if you pass without a clutch pedal you can only drive cars without a clutch pedal.
I do find the fuel consumption for the Toyota on the motorway quite disappointing. I drive about 38k miles a year and currently drive a Volvo XC60 T6 recharge (small battery). On motorways at 120-130 km/h it uses about 6.5l. In the UK for the long drive it was just above 6l/100km. That’s a difference of only about 1.2l/100km for a car that is considerably heavier, less aerodynamic and way more powerful. In the city and on secondary roads my consumption is lower, but there I use the PHEV advantage.
And I am sure my V60 T6 will be better than the XC60. But all and all: the smaller Toyota isn’t that much more economical than a bigger, more comfortable car that is way more fun (and comfortable) to drive. Bigger engines can be efficient in the correct circumstances.
I got one myself. Going ~120-130km/h mine sits around 4.4L/100km. That's 47% more efficient than your Volvo. Most of my driving is during the daytime however, then the Dutch speed limit is 100km/h. At that speed, my average is ~3.6 liters/100km. The key point with Toyota's hybrid system is to not constantly drive it agressively. If you do so, economy takes a nose dive, especially at 120-130km/h.
I own a C-HR hybrid. Drove 2k on holiday. Mostly 120/130kph on the German autobahn. Real (not bc) consumption 4.8L/100km. Most important thing… no worries about ADAC…
Interesting results. I expected the diesel to do better.
Surely these self charging hybrids are the future over full charging EV's
petrol is a finite resource, so at some point its going to be too expensive to buy petrol
there are diesels that do beter, much better.
I dont think its entirely fair that the dual carriageway/motorway is emptier in the hybrids test even if the speed is the same as when you're around traffic on a fast road like a dual carriageway or motorway it creates allot of turbulance and air movement in the direction of travel. Larger vehicles can also shield you from the full brunt of the wind.
I know in my car gets about 65mpg at 60mph on an empty motorway, on a fairy busy but flowing motorway it can get 77mpg at 60mph.
The main reason why I chose to buy Toyota Prius (it was a single car on sale in a whole Montenegro country) instead of regular diesel europe cars (Citroens, VW, etc) is that I know it's VERY VERY reliable car. Toyota Prius has absolutely reliable transmission. There is nothing that can break or wear there. It has quite reliable engine that can easily last up to 500 000 km and more. And it's pretty efficient. If the road is straight, without mountains, then it can do up to 3.5L/100km on a highway.
They’re more expensive to run than EVs
Understandably, many drivers complain of the high cost of switching to an EV, because the sticker price, or monthly payment, is higher than that of an equivalent diesel car. Used EVs are also still relatively rare.
However, while switching to an EV seems expensive, it might not be as expensive as you think, when you take the total cost of ownership (TCO) into account. EVs have fewer moving parts, so repairs and maintenance are less expensive; charging an EV from your domestic tariff - even at recent high prices - is about half the cost of filling a tank with diesel; and demand for used EVs means that they command a relatively high resale value.
Add those together and most owners will find that running an EV is, in fact, not as pricey as a diesel.
A few years ago, I was given a Ford Mondeo Vignale 2.0 Hybrid (Atkinson engine, non-plug in on 235 width tyres) which weighed 1650kg . I drove that to Manchester and back regularly. Best I achieved was hypermiling (56mph, gentle accel not to kick in engine, regen braking only) it and got 42.5 mpg. In my 2.0 diesel Peugeot 407 which also weighed 1650kg on 235 width tyres, I can do the same journey, at the same speed and get 65mpg. The Mondeo was about 10 years newer and with 100k less miles on the clock. Quite disappointed in the results!
That's because ford's hybrid was rubbish. There's a reason most private hire in London is Toyota hybrids. Easy 55 to 60 mpg average. More if you try.
@@dd9ag Please elaborate and provide proof... the private hire's in London are mostly Prius, which is a class down from the Mondeo (hence weighs less, closest competitor would be between the Focus and Fiesta). The Ford is a very attractive package, Atkinson engine, CVT gearbox and an excellent charging / use system allowing one pedal driving. Toyota will be more reliable...but that's not a metric I touched on.
@@khalidacosta7133 well the Toyota isn’t just more reliable it’s more economical as you proved. A lot seem to be Prius plus 7 seaters which are just as spacious as mondeos.
@@dd9ag I don't think you understand how car manufacturers operate platforms. The Mondeo is a platform above the Prius platform, which requires better NVH. This increases weight, decreasing fuel economy, amongst other things. It is irrelevant to speculate one has better fuel economy or not, based on what you "feel" and what taxi drivers in London use. The closest competitor, the Toyota Camry Hybrid has an official fuel economy of 53mpg. I'll stick with my diesel where I get 56mpg without a problem.
@@khalidacosta7133 oh sure i do, i get that the mondeo is a d segment car. The prius is arguably a c segment car so as you say the mondeo will be heavier and less fuel efficient. But i have a RAV 4 hybrid which is more efficient. It’s possible the mondeo is longer but it has similar space and refinement to a d segment car yet i get 50-60 mpg. The official mpg of the camry you quite is wltp, i bet the wltp of a mondeo is less. But anyway you were talking about a hybrid mondeo weren’t you?
For me the best average use have from Toledo 1,6tdi 65-75mpg.
It's 9 years old wv engine.. very satisfying. Cheap to maintain, service ,drive.
When you pulled over the first time you should have popped into Janes pantry they do the best bacon and egg sandwich.
Would like a review of the new car after you owned it for a bit! Nice video
Great video -- as always, impressive dilligence and methodic approach. Also, your narrative is clear, informative and straightforward, and yet it's very pleasant and engaging to listen to.
Congratulations for the car -- it does look like a great, modern, advanced and very sensible market offer.
I have nothing particularly wise to say about that, apparently rather sensationalist, documentary you mention towards the end of the video, but one may wonder why the petrol engines employed in hybrid-powered cars should produce more dangerous polution than other combustion engines. On the face of it, it doesn't make any sense, since in such setting the engine gets to work in its optimum rev range the most often, and engines, I believe, tend to produce less toxic exhaust (and one most efficiently dealt with by the catalytic converter) when they are at their optimum revs and load. So, unless the "trickery" involved in the Atkinson cycle may lead to different emission characteristics than those of a regular petrol engine (which, admittedly, it may), it would indeed appear quite incredible.
I was thinking that the Atkinson cycle may change things but I don't know.
I feel like most concerns for hybrid emissions are based on times where you put your foot down and wake up a cold engine and have it deliver near full throttle without it warming up. Older cars used to run rich on startup but direct injection and heated O2 sensors probably minimise this a lot.
+ I think some hybrid cars preheat the engine.. Hopefully reduces any engine wear from cold thrashing.
Great video. Real world scenarios like you’ve done here give the real world driver a more realistic picture. Of course, keeping the Citroen rather than buying the Toyota would save a lot of money. I wonder if a manual diesel Citroen would be even more economical. That’s probably another video!
In 2015 I had a brand new C4 1.6 HDi, the same shape as this one, but it was a 6 speed manual. On a run between Rome and Venice, it hit just over 62mpg which isn't bad considering the motorway was relatively twisty, with long gradients. The only time I really had to stop was to pay tolls and the start stop system kicked in without fail every time.
Buying a new car is not cheaper than a similar 10 year old car. The manual will probably be worse as it doesn't have the micro hybrid system and this auto is still a manual gearbox, just with a robot changing gear. It will come down to how it is driven.
Now, this is just the amount of fuel. In our country diesel is cheaper than petrol, so it almost evens out if calculated in money instead of liters. On top of that, the older diesel is much less capital lying on the road, so financially, the diesel is far better off. A stronger version of this diesel engine would have had a better torque and thus an even better mileage.
12 year old Diesel ( with 136k miles on the clock) vs brand new Hybrid. OMG. And yet not a lot of difference...apart from their current purchase prices approx. 2k vs 32k! The old banger still running good, but not very clean for sure. Next time please compare the 23 cars for more relevant result. Cheers
Had the same thought. While fuel costs may be similar, there's a few tank fulls in 25k purchase price!
Very informative and deep video! Congratulations!
If You have a little interest in saving fuel the most efficient way of moving the Toyota hybrid is to coast, its very simple because all You have to do is to feather the accelerator so the car is close to freewheeling. You don't have to do anything else, your brake and stearing servo:s are electric and functions normally and the engine is shut of so there is no idling. You dont have to take this to any extreme, If You just keep it as a mind set and apply it over time to any degree when it's appropriat Your gas mileage will improve. It's not for everyone but I personally find it natural and satisfying.
I’ve had a 70 reg Corolla Design spec from new. It has now covered 62k the total average is 59.4 mpg however, my boot is always full of work tools etc. this figure will lower during the winter months and increase as we approach the summer. It also has the adaptive cruise as shown that works really well in traffic.
Also if you own a car with a turbo. You should let the car idol for 30 seconds before turning the engine off. This allows the turbo spool to fully settle and allow oil to remain there
somewhat different now with start /stop tech... if you park your car and then engine turns off for the start/stop function, you can just turn the engine off.... if it doesn't, let it idle as you say..
Bought a Corolla estate early this year to replace a Honda Civic Diesel. I live in rural ireland and am comfortably averaging 4l/100km(~70mpg), you do have to learn how to get the best from the hybrid system - there is an energy flow screen which shows when the engine/battery or both are driving the wheels but much more importantly also shows when you are recovering charge back into the battery, teaches you to let the recovery system do the breaking on approach to junctions etc. Service costs and frequency are a big factor counting against diesels now - to meet the latest standards oil changes need to be more frequent and pushes the costs in favour of the hybrids. In terms of hybrid emissions in urban areas - where I live most of the driving in the small towns and villages is in electric mode - zero.
With regards to emissions there's a massive difference between Cat 5 and Cat 6 diesel. Also, it's a pity you didn't compare the new hybrid with a diesel that wasn't 12 years old. My only experience of driving a mild hybrid was an XC40 that returned around 25mpg! So I bought a diesel that returns 65mpg.
My 2.0l Lexus UX 250h is getting 57 mpg which is good enough for me.
Amazing attention to details.
Interesting video. A very marginal difference in fuel economy that will take a very, very long time to offset the cost of getting the new car.
It would be also interesting to compare things such as service costs and reliability. For example Toyotas are known to be bullet proof, unlike Citroen that doesn't have as good reputation on reliability long term. Hybrids do not have any big maintenance works other than various fluid changes and health-checkup for the hybrid system (including battery).
Diesel can't be beat for long motorway trips up n down country at constant speeds that's the main selling point, be interested see price the Toyota vs equal diesel
A much better comparison would have been to compare a 2023 diesel to the Corolla while including the starting price of both cars to get a better idea of the economy.
Thank you for such an interesting video.
I know that you would have checked the tire pressures on both cars before your tests, would be nice if you mentioned it.
Also the level of the traction battery in the hybrid at the start and end of each test would indicate possible economy variance. The aircon for both cars would add more discrepancies as their operations are totally different. Maybe best to test with them off on a cool day when heating and cooling are not needed.
Would love to see another economy test of the Corolla in the winter.
I drive a rav 4 hybrid awd 2020, get about 600-650 miles out of 49l e10 unleaded in summer. I coldest winter months can drop to about 520 miles out of the same amount of fuel. This will happen between about December and February.
@@andersriksson100 yes not nautical miles.
@@dd9ag 😄😄 good one! I had gallons in my head when I asked... 600-650 nautical miles would be awsome, however not to be expected. 600-650 miles is still impressive for a SUV!
@@andersriksson100 i was thinking are there some other kind of miles I’m not aware of lol!
Just passed today! Thanks for the videos. Does anyone else feel like they aren't good enough even though they passed 😂
Congratulations on passing! You will likely feel more confident with practice. It's best to start driving as soon as you can after passing the test.
Well done, thank you!
I'm driving diesel Golf , this is my 4th diesel now (before that I was driving petrols), and all I have to say is this is the last diesel for me , no more sir. From now on it will be some Japanese naturaly aspirated petrol...
The biggest problem is people don't drive a hybrid correctly to achieve great mpg you need good forward planning and to break early and steadily to get the best out of the regen and to accelerate within the eco band, if its in electric mode accelerate gently and when the engine kicks on accelerate more rapidly to help reduce engine run time
you can also blip the throttle, if its in the lower half of the eco band, this will get it into ev mode...
Did you drive Toyota as any other vehicle or did you use any technics how to make the consumption even lower? For example, if you raise up the gas pedal swiftly, the engine shuts off immediately and you get more electric drive. Those rolling country roads are perfect for that. Also there's a marker in the economy meter to identify when the gas engine kicks in. That's the "ECO" marker half way between CHARGE and POWER. Use petrol engine to accelerate a little bit over speed and then raise up the gas pedal for 0,5s and then try to keep the econymy meter just under the ECO to stay as long as possible in EV drive. You'll be able to cut 20% more of your consumpition, if you know the tricks.
Nice scenic drives around Essex
Excellent video. You have one new subscriber.
A Toyota Yaris Hybrid 2016 model. No car aficionado we have use it from new, seamless transition from electric to petrol power mode. About 60 mpg in a Cornish location. Our last car, last motorcycle a couple of years back. Diesel Kia before that, particulates guilt ended that relationship. A personal transition.
Diesels are better if you can take the DPF off! More torque, better economy, better soundproofing, faster midrange acceleration. Low revs means more relaxed to drive. Lower CO2 than a petrol.
Phased out to find new ways of taxing people even if better for the environment. With high MPG it meant less fuel bought, so less tax.
'elephant race up ahead' hahahah! That's a good one, I better start using that. My term for this is a 31-32...one dude doing 32mph overtaking another doing 31 mph
I think the Documentry you are on about Richard, taken into account the emmisions of building a car Diesel/Electric car, then running them for life expectancy of a normal car, then compared the difference, and it wasn't on the first set of batteries for the electric car due to the manufacturing process. using petrol automatics in a week, and no hybrids, it was costing me more than the diesel C4 Picasso automatic I had, so for the hybrid to have kept up, then some serious battery power advantage, as the hire cars I was using were 23 plate, and they couldn't keep up with my old car pound for pound was nearly double. the electric car I got is about comparable with the diesel, but that is because I got to pay stupid prices for electric at the service stations until I get a discount card.
This hybrid is far more economical than a typical petrol car as the engine is able to run more efficiently. The battery's purpose is to allow the engine to be more efficient.
Elephant race! (8:50). That's the first time I've heard a truck on truck dual carriageway race called that.
id love to see this between the toyota and a diesel hybrid
I went from a 2016 diesel Kia Pro_Cee'd to a 2021 Corolla Hybrid 2 years ago. While the Kia achieved the same fuel economy as the Toyota, it's all done in a more relaxed manner. It's also nicer inside, more comfortable and more fun to drive when the roads get twisty.
I do argue that the Mk2 Pro_Cee'd is the best looking hatchback of the last decade though.
What fuel economy do you get?
@@ofah6378 on average about 4.8l\100km. That does deteriorate if there's a lot of motorway driving, but only by a half litre or so. Town driving alone brings it to about 4l.
A couple of other factors, diesel is roughly 20 pence a gallon more expensive, also in cold weather the heating in petrol cars kicks in quicker than diesel cars something my partner always complain about on short journeys. I’ve just purchased a 2022/03 Hyundai hybrid and observing the display it appears to use the battery power a lot of the time. I’ve just parted with my 2013 Citroen Picasso 1.6 diesel with 107,000 miles on the clock and apart from the usual things that wear out the serpentine belt and tensioners were the only faulty part that needed replacing.
20 deg C in a car is too low, aren't you freezing? I put mine at around 25 degC both in winter (outside temp is around 0 degC sometimes goes below) and in summer (outside temp is around 35 sometimes 40 degC)
Are you female? It's pretty well established that women like warmer environments than men. I personally hate temperatures above 20C. I guess it is my metabolism. GF's treat me as a human hot water bottle / electric blanket in the winter 😉
@@Drew-Dastardly No, I'm a man but it doesn't matter because 20°C is low. But I think that because on UK there is not so hot like in my country (Serbia) so we like it little bit wormer. And it is not healthy to have very big temperature difference between outside and inside. Max 5-10°C difference. For example this days temps here are around 35°C so it is OK to set AC to 25°C and thst is max. If you set it to lower than that imagine the shock when you go outside on 40°C in the street (it is 35°C in shades).
I will say in the UK it is not just the temperature, but especially the humidity. We are an island and it gets very humid which is horrible. A dry heat can be 10C hotter than a wet heat and be fine.
@@Drew-Dastardly It is humid in Serbia too, maybe not so much like where you are but it is not dry like in Egipt :D , but we are used to that kind of climate like you are to your's.
Back to topic, car will use more fuel if you set the AC to the very low temps in summer, but it will use the same amount of fuel to heat in winter. EVs, in the other hand, will use more energy to heat in winter then to cool in summer ;)
Just a point to note - Toyota's claiming that with the new generation model, the 2.0 liter version is more economical than the 1.8 liter, at a figure of 64.1 MPG and 62.7 MPG respectively for identical spec models, in addition to the bigger engine apparently having less emissions.
Yes but only if its a Toyota hybrid since they are the best at making reliable hybrids and reliable cars in general, a Mercedes Diesel or VW Diesel is a very good choice too. Toyota vs Citroen is an automatic win for Toyota.
True for the UK, but not for Autobahn driving in Germany. If you ever blasted a modern Diesel over a hilly Autobahn, you are never, ever going for anything else. Such a treat; provided it's 5 am in summertime. Still Toyota's technology is very appealing e.g. for toxi driving in cities.