Thank you for posting. My Wing Chun teacher says were under Leung Shung lineage. He learnt from Chris Chan(not the one with videos who was a student under Lok Yu)out here in CA back in the 70's or 80's.
@@lpjunction your so-called element of Wing Chun is the wrong concept of Wing Chun. Isn't it obvious? You probably thought correct Wing Chun should look like what you see in this video, right? This is called mainstream Wing Chun, aka unscientific and unworkable Wing Chun. If this is the correct version, there wouldn't be chunners getting beaten up by non Wing Chun guys regularly and those videos are in TH-cam. The version of Wing Chun in our videos is the most scientific and workable version which should be closest to the ancient and original Wing Chun. Those guys in our videos could use it to spar spontaneously and they use Wing Chun techniques unlike the mainstream chunners. We have the disclosure on TH-cam. It has the scientific explanations and it also teaches you how to conduct scientific research to check what's scientific and what's unscientific.
@@smartresearchwingchun494 What shown above is just student exercise. But it contains the elements of Wing Chun. On the other hand, the video shown on the TH-cam about Smart Research Wing Chun does not have that element. May be the masters were busy doing something else. Who knows? It doesn't matter if you agree with the main stream guys or not. The big question remains, if you think the old school is unworkable and unscientific, then why would you call yourself Wing Chun.
@@lpjunction this video shows no element of Wing Chun, this thing that you see above is actually a mistake and error - we had researched the mainstream Wing Chun and we know it. We had uncovered what many people don't know: the mainstream Wing Chun instruction is unscientific - this is why you don't see the techniques usable against non-Wing Chun guys. This exercise that you see is a distorted Chi Sau; the original version shouldn't look anything like this. Our disclosure is on Udemy and Google Play.
Love the reaction and excitement from the master when student do the moves correctly! such a positive feedback!
Fellow Leung Sheung practitioner here. 😊
So great to see fellow Leung Sheung lineage students. I can't understand Cantonese but still enjoyed the video. Are these classes in Hong Kong?
+Simon Chew For more details, please check with facebook fans page
+Simon Chew Please share this page if you feel good
+W Cas I'm following your Facebook page and have asked others to check it out as well.
Those double palm strikes are crazy... have to be careful, they will give back pains even with little energy to the receiver.
硬手硬腳 , 似機械人
Thank you for posting. My Wing Chun teacher says were under Leung Shung lineage. He learnt from Chris Chan(not the one with videos who was a student under Lok Yu)out here in CA back in the 70's or 80's.
This mainstream Wing Chun is unscientific and unworkable. Check out our disclosure Smart Research Wing Chun on Udemy.
@@smartresearchwingchun494
Wish you have something to show.
From the 'Smart Research' TH-cam video, I couldn't find any element of Wing Chun.
@@lpjunction your so-called element of Wing Chun is the wrong concept of Wing Chun. Isn't it obvious? You probably thought correct Wing Chun should look like what you see in this video, right? This is called mainstream Wing Chun, aka unscientific and unworkable Wing Chun. If this is the correct version, there wouldn't be chunners getting beaten up by non Wing Chun guys regularly and those videos are in TH-cam.
The version of Wing Chun in our videos is the most scientific and workable version which should be closest to the ancient and original Wing Chun. Those guys in our videos could use it to spar spontaneously and they use Wing Chun techniques unlike the mainstream chunners. We have the disclosure on TH-cam. It has the scientific explanations and it also teaches you how to conduct scientific research to check what's scientific and what's unscientific.
@@smartresearchwingchun494
What shown above is just student exercise. But it contains the elements of Wing Chun.
On the other hand, the video shown on the TH-cam about Smart Research Wing Chun does not have that element. May be the masters were busy doing something else. Who knows?
It doesn't matter if you agree with the main stream guys or not. The big question remains, if you think the old school is unworkable and unscientific, then why would you call yourself Wing Chun.
@@lpjunction this video shows no element of Wing Chun, this thing that you see above is actually a mistake and error - we had researched the mainstream Wing Chun and we know it. We had uncovered what many people don't know: the mainstream Wing Chun instruction is unscientific - this is why you don't see the techniques usable against non-Wing Chun guys. This exercise that you see is a distorted Chi Sau; the original version shouldn't look anything like this. Our disclosure is on Udemy and Google Play.
Gladiator Wing chun !! Just like judo, there s nothing "gentle and soft" ever since it became an Olympic event. Sad.
For more details, please check with facebook fans page
m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=877089375662147
This is wrong Chi Sau. Their arms are distorted here that's why they can synchronize amongst themselves but not with non-Wing Chun people.
you’re wrong buddy