I'm not sure what Ray Ban's decision for these lenses are, other than trying to do something out of the box to get noticed in the industry? 1. Optically they won't be as good in your peripheral vision compared to normal creating more distorted vision. 2. The lenses won't match the face-form wrap of the human head for a majority of people, letting in more light on the sides. 3. As she mentioned, they can't offer prescription or polarized option due to the unconventional shape, really limiting their use case potential. If they wanted to cater to people with lower bridges or bigger cheeks, they could have made an "alternate fit" version that has a slightly flatter base curve and bigger nose pad bridge arms like Maui Jim's have on certain models.
I was curious when these came out, and this is exactly what I expected. This is what happens when you try to make something "cool" by going against evolution and basic biology, that's the reason our eyeballs are convex. The design seems anti-evolution, thus making them a bit stupid.
Hello! Most wrap around frame models with 2 distinct lenses (NOT single shield lens designs) hold prescription though due to the high wrap they do not accommodate very high Rx strengths. To find out if a particular model will work with your prescription, give us a call to speak with a live optician who will go over the details of your Rx and recommend frames that suit your individual needs 🔥 877.289.2999 info@sportrx.com
Hello! Non-polarized lenses are essential for some people and activities where polarization is not a benefit. Pilots, for example, cannot use polarized lenses as it interferes with their ability to read instrumentation while in the cockpit. While polarization is critical for fisherman, it can also negatively affect depth perception for other activities where quick reaction time is tied to performance like baseball, Mountain Biking, Tennis, etc. Hope this helps!
Hey Ser! Not sure if we'll do a full review of the RB 3796 but check out the links below for a breakdown of similar design characteristics as well as Chromance Lens technology... 👉th-cam.com/video/RC6cpa0hOg4/w-d-xo.html 👉th-cam.com/video/IWiZ-PzOmuM/w-d-xo.html
Since the Aviator Reverse is not polarised how does it compare against a the original polarised version in terms of 99% UV protection it offers? Is it the same as a non-polarised Aviator original?
Hi! Good point! The design of the reverse does suggest more light can enter from the top of the frame. Although after wearing and testing the aviators in sunny conditions we can say that it lets in about the same amount of light as that of the original
Looks cool, but I think it's going to let more light IN to the eyes, which sunglasses are obviously supposed to keep light out lol.
What pls explain easily
@@t3minator.69 the lenses are basically backwards, so they let more light on the eyes instead of keeping it off the eyes.
Rayban- “we took everything from the classic and pulled out all the features like polarized lenses, no prescription and charge the same amount” 😂
Ridiculous, isn't it? Exactly which market is that supposed to be for?
Reverse is close to Titanium frame by long bridge up. and 2nd thing the lens is more protection from scratch if you put it on the table by mistake.
Original all the way for me. 😎
I like the original on these. Looking forward for wayfarer vid 🙂👏🏼
I like it! Time to refresh my sunglasses. Will buy boyfriend model.
Good choice!
I'm not sure what Ray Ban's decision for these lenses are, other than trying to do something out of the box to get noticed in the industry?
1. Optically they won't be as good in your peripheral vision compared to normal creating more distorted vision.
2. The lenses won't match the face-form wrap of the human head for a majority of people, letting in more light on the sides.
3. As she mentioned, they can't offer prescription or polarized option due to the unconventional shape, really limiting their use case potential.
If they wanted to cater to people with lower bridges or bigger cheeks, they could have made an "alternate fit" version that has a slightly flatter base curve and bigger nose pad bridge arms like Maui Jim's have on certain models.
I was curious when these came out, and this is exactly what I expected. This is what happens when you try to make something "cool" by going against evolution and basic biology, that's the reason our eyeballs are convex. The design seems anti-evolution, thus making them a bit stupid.
I want them upside down
Which rap around sunglasses can be used with prescription lenses? And how long does it take to make them?
Hello! Most wrap around frame models with 2 distinct lenses (NOT single shield lens designs) hold prescription though due to the high wrap they do not accommodate very high Rx strengths. To find out if a particular model will work with your prescription, give us a call to speak with a live optician who will go over the details of your Rx and recommend frames that suit your individual needs 🔥
877.289.2999
info@sportrx.com
Reverse are dope and addictive
I'm working on getting all frame style color ways in the reverse collection.
What's The Point If They Aren't Polarized
Hello! Non-polarized lenses are essential for some people and activities where polarization is not a benefit. Pilots, for example, cannot use polarized lenses as it interferes with their ability to read instrumentation while in the cockpit. While polarization is critical for fisherman, it can also negatively affect depth perception for other activities where quick reaction time is tied to performance like baseball, Mountain Biking, Tennis, etc. Hope this helps!
Hello guys, can you do a review of the rayban rb 3796 chromance please
Hey Ser! Not sure if we'll do a full review of the RB 3796 but check out the links below for a breakdown of similar design characteristics as well as Chromance Lens technology...
👉th-cam.com/video/RC6cpa0hOg4/w-d-xo.html
👉th-cam.com/video/IWiZ-PzOmuM/w-d-xo.html
Can you give me the model number of that aviator where tom cruise were the movie top gun please
Hello! 👉www.sportrx.com/ray-ban-rb3025-aviator-58-eyesize.html🔥model number RB3025 L0205-58
I could only recommend people buy the original, because of Top Gun, I’m really that shallow.
Since the Aviator Reverse is not polarised how does it compare against a the original polarised version in terms of 99% UV protection it offers? Is it the same as a non-polarised Aviator original?
The Reverse lenses offer the same amount of UV protection as the standard non-polarized Aviator lenses at around 85% 😎
Looks to me like they will let more sun in from the top.
Hi! Good point! The design of the reverse does suggest more light can enter from the top of the frame. Although after wearing and testing the aviators in sunny conditions we can say that it lets in about the same amount of light as that of the original
Original looks waaay better btw
These are the worst thing they’ve ever released lmfao.
Zé da manga
Don’t like it
The real question is... Why doesn't woman have a ring💍
She gorgeous 😍
Stupid concept.