I salute u sir...bhut he acha way nal expain Kita ha...ek ek word samj lag gya...and thanks sir bina kesi fee to tusi eni achi law ki knowledge da rha ho...sir thanu mil k special thanks krna chaunda ha...m from faridkot court..m practicing lawyer form last three years...so u r lectures is very beneficial..
Sir is sec 6 based on juridical possession ?? OR Lawful possession ?? And suppose the tenant while he was out of this house for sime time , his landlord has removed all his goods from his house . Then can the tenant invoke sec 6 of SRA? As as such he was not in actual possession at that time ??
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 that’s a broad answer na sir. Court fee act will apply for every suit. Under section 6 for declaration and recovery I was thinking 3/4 on circle rate of property. I was not sure how they calculate for sec 5
sir in case of rent agreement such agreement is over and tenant till not dispossess the accommodation then we can move court under sec 5 of SRA act ......becouse of agreement is over...or the rent control act prevail on sec 5 of SRA Act in particular state????
Thank u sir your videos are really very helpful to understand law in better way. It's my request if you consider pls share Cr.p.c video also if possible. Thank you once again 😊
Sir.... The suit for Specific performance of contract of sale of immovable property will be instituted under section 5 or section 10 of SRA? And What about declaratory suit of title whether it will be filed under section 5 or section 34 of SRA sir.....?
Dear sir... 💓 se Thank you....you are such an ideal mentor..... Sir can you plz make videos on domestic violence act, probation of offender act, juvenile justice, NI Act after completing SRA... because these are the local acts For RJS 2020 Exam and it's notification is out....so I request you to please make videos on these local acts....thanks....& Luv you sir 💓
In order to proceed in landlord-tenant court, there must be a landlord-tenant relationship between the parties. In most cases, this relationship is memorialized by a written lease. But what if there’s no written lease? The parties still may be landlord and tenant. For example, in a situation with no written lease, look to see if periodic rent has been agreed upon and paid. How much is the rent? Is it payable monthly, weekly, yearly, or at some other regular interval? Has the tenant ever paid it? Are there other indicia of a landlord-tenant relationship( this is the case of eviction) If the parties don’t have a landlord-tenant relationship as described above, then an owner who wants to remove an occupant must file an action in ejectment. Ejectment is the proper way to remove a person other than a tenant who is in possession of real property -- for example, a temporary occupant who has never paid rent but now refuses to leave(this is the case of enjoyment)
Sir ji question h ek ki ENUMERATE VARIOUS SPECIFIC REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO LITIGANTS UNDER SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT ? ISME KONSE KONSE SECTION AAYENGE SIR PLZ REPLY ?
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 okay sirji but injunction smj gya but specific performance k liye kon konse section appropriate honge likne k liye wo bta dete tho meharbaani hoti
Sir if we want to file a suit under section 5 then limitation on basis of title is tweleve year but if we want to file a suit under section 6 on the basis of possession then as per limitation article 64 it is 12 years but in sec 6 only 6 months mention kindly explain this concept 🤔
The object of Section 6 is to prevent persons taking law into their own hands and so it provides for a special, summary and speedy remedy for protecting the possession held. A suit under Article 64 is not summary in character and is designed to protect previous possession. Further there is no right of appeal or review in respect of suits under Section 6; nor can a suit be brought against the Government under that section but an appeal or review can be filled against the suit under art 64 of limitation act
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 hnji sir but sec 5 title ki bat kar rha hai aur sec 6 previous possession ki bat kar rha hai to phir article 64 ka jo 12 year hai from the date of dispossession on the basis of previous possession not on title uska kya mean hai ???
If he fails to come within 6 month than he can file a civil suit for the recovery of his property from where he was dispossessed but in that case no summary remedy by given to him. It is not only to be shown but to prove in a case that he is entitled over the property.
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 if six months period is over then he can file a suit under section 5 read with article 64 of limitation for possession on the basis of previous possession
Sir as you mentioned Juridical Possession does not mean Lawful Possession. It doesn't mean whether possession is lawful or not. Right. Again in lecture we learn that Trespass does not fall under ambit of sec -6 and that is unlawful head. Then how does lawful possession is valid. Pease Clear my doubt.
Trespass is an offence so offender can't take its benefit but a trespasser who remain on property for more then 12 yrs, and is entitled to remain on it as per law, so any person who dispossed him, gives him ryt, to claim back his possession under this act
sir aapne bataya Neyveli Case mein plaintiff trespasser nhi hona chaiye and juridical posession doesnt mean lawful possession, toh mera question hai if plaintiff was not in lawful possession because he himself had dispossessed the owner and now he was dispossessed by owner, Is such plaintiff eligible for taking relief u/s 6? Please batayein.
Good afternoon sir. Sir can you plz elaborate the meaning of this line :- Mere possessory title is good enough to maintain an action under section 5 of specific Relief act. (Somnath vs Raju AIR 1970 SC 846)
Sir aapko sunne k baad bare act ki language bilkul aasan ho jata h. Thanks sir
Thank you sir for your support to needy student who can't avail costly coaching.🙏🙏
Thankyou Sir for the Notes + Video Lectures having great revision of previous lectures.
Welcome g
thnku sirrr apki vajah se mnu ik question solve kiya hai aur muje bhut khushi ho rhi a thnku sir ssoo much
GOOD morning sir g
Apka koi jawab nai hai 👍
Thnx sir❤❤
Really u r best sir
Thankyou so much sir .. your lectures are very beneficial ❤️
Best explaination
Well done sir 👍🙂
Very nice video lecture thank you so much sir
Thanks sir ji
Thnkuu sir ji...🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
I salute u sir...bhut he acha way nal expain Kita ha...ek ek word samj lag gya...and thanks sir bina kesi fee to tusi eni achi law ki knowledge da rha ho...sir thanu mil k special thanks krna chaunda ha...m from faridkot court..m practicing lawyer form last three years...so u r lectures is very beneficial..
Thank u
Great lecture 👍
Great work Sir 👍
Boht achhe se samjh aya sir🙂
Very nice sir
Thank u sir for the cases 👍✌️✌️
Thank you for the lecture sir!
Gud lecture sir
Very good Sir
Sir is sec 6 based on juridical possession ??
OR Lawful possession ??
And suppose the tenant while he was out of this house for sime time , his landlord has removed all his goods from his house . Then can the tenant invoke sec 6 of SRA? As as such he was not in actual possession at that time ??
Sir u/s6, possession means only actual possession? Or it includes constructive possession also?
Both
Nice video sir.
Sir whether the defeated plaintiff
later on can file suit for declaration and possession on basis of his title?
(Defeated u/s 6)
Super lecture
Thankyou so much 😊
Sir, if somebody lease his property then Both lessee and lessor are entitled or not to file a suit according to sec. 5.
Brother ur question is not clear
Sir, who is other person entitled to claim other than the owner according to section 5.
Thanku sir
Sir, under specific relief act sec 5, what will be the court fee to declare title and recovery possession?
Court fees act will apply
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 that’s a broad answer na sir. Court fee act will apply for every suit. Under section 6 for declaration and recovery I was thinking 3/4 on circle rate of property. I was not sure how they calculate for sec 5
sir in case of rent agreement such agreement is over and tenant till not dispossess the accommodation then we can move court under sec 5 of SRA act ......becouse of agreement is over...or the rent control act prevail on sec 5 of SRA Act in particular state????
Rent control act
Part performance मे sir fir saler section 5 mai suit laega ?
Thank u sir your videos are really very helpful to understand law in better way. It's my request if you consider pls share Cr.p.c video also if possible. Thank you once again 😊
Will do each subject one by one
sir if a person is dispossessed by another person who has better tilte,,then can a person who is dispossessed can take remedy under s.5?
Sir section 6 chh ohh previous possession ......or possessory right mei court ja shtka hai ???? Tenant
Sir.... The suit for Specific performance of contract of sale of immovable property will be instituted under section 5 or section 10 of SRA? And
What about declaratory suit of title whether it will be filed under section 5 or section 34 of SRA sir.....?
Declaratory suit section 34
Recovery under sec 5
Thanks sir for giving me your time..... Doubt is also clear sir thanks...
👍👍👍👏👏👏
sir,i have a question that what is the difference between right and title????
Dear sir... 💓 se Thank you....you are such an ideal mentor.....
Sir can you plz make videos on domestic violence act, probation of offender act, juvenile justice, NI Act after completing SRA... because these are the local acts For RJS 2020 Exam and it's notification is out....so I request you to please make videos on these local acts....thanks....& Luv you sir 💓
Will do all subjects one by one
Sir, what is the difference between suit for ejectment and suit for eviction..?
In order to proceed in landlord-tenant court, there must be a landlord-tenant relationship between the parties. In most cases, this relationship is memorialized by a written lease. But what if there’s no written lease? The parties still may be landlord and tenant. For example, in a situation with no written lease, look to see if periodic rent has been agreed upon and paid. How much is the rent? Is it payable monthly, weekly, yearly, or at some other regular interval? Has the tenant ever paid it? Are there other indicia of a landlord-tenant relationship( this is the case of eviction)
If the parties don’t have a landlord-tenant relationship as described above, then an owner who wants to remove an occupant must file an action in ejectment. Ejectment is the proper way to remove a person other than a tenant who is in possession of real property -- for example, a temporary occupant who has never paid rent but now refuses to leave(this is the case of enjoyment)
Thq sir
Sir je apne six months expire ho gye sec 6 ch ta ki fir apa sec 5 ch ja skde a dispossesion de base te?
In sec 5 u have to prove that u r Entitled to such property only than u can get the relief
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 ok sir thanks
Sir ji question h ek ki
ENUMERATE VARIOUS SPECIFIC REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO LITIGANTS UNDER SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT ?
ISME KONSE KONSE SECTION AAYENGE SIR PLZ REPLY ?
specific performance And injunctiin, only these two remedies are there
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 okay sirji but injunction smj gya but specific performance k liye kon konse section appropriate honge likne k liye wo bta dete tho meharbaani hoti
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 qki sirji 14 marks me aatah h aur confused hun what to write
Sir if we want to file a suit under section 5 then limitation on basis of title is tweleve year but if we want to file a suit under section 6 on the basis of possession then as per limitation article 64 it is 12 years but in sec 6 only 6 months mention kindly explain this concept 🤔
The object of Section 6 is to prevent persons taking law into their own hands and so it provides for a special, summary and speedy remedy for protecting the possession held. A suit under Article 64 is not summary in character and is designed to protect previous possession.
Further there is no right of appeal or review in respect of suits under Section 6; nor can a suit be brought against the Government under that section but an appeal or review can be filled against the suit under art 64 of limitation act
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 hnji sir but sec 5 title ki bat kar rha hai aur sec 6 previous possession ki bat kar rha hai to phir article 64 ka jo 12 year hai from the date of dispossession on the basis of previous possession not on title uska kya mean hai ???
If he fails to come within 6 month than he can file a civil suit for the recovery of his property from where he was dispossessed but in that case no summary remedy by given to him. It is not only to be shown but to prove in a case that he is entitled over the property.
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 if six months period is over then he can file a suit under section 5 read with article 64 of limitation for possession on the basis of previous possession
Sir, jaisa ki Aapne bataya sec 6(3) SRA me koi appeal ya review Nahi ho sakta, lakin kya Revision ho sakta he?
Hello sir ... Yeah section (6) hai uski appeal and review ho skti hai kya ....
Sir as you mentioned Juridical Possession does not mean Lawful Possession. It doesn't mean whether possession is lawful or not. Right.
Again in lecture we learn that Trespass does not fall under ambit of sec -6 and that is unlawful head.
Then how does lawful possession is valid. Pease Clear my doubt.
Trespass is an offence so offender can't take its benefit but a trespasser who remain on property for more then 12 yrs, and is entitled to remain on it as per law, so any person who dispossed him, gives him ryt, to claim back his possession under this act
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir the unlawful means here referred to is adverse possession of that property?
Thank you sir..
Sir section 5 is based on title...what does it mean?
Whether title means ownership or it means any good title where person is entitled by law??
Person entitled to the possession words r used, so it may be any title, owner, mortgagee, lease, tenant as they all are entitled
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 thank you sir
Welcome g
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir when will you start the lecture series on sales of goods Act?
Tomorrow
Sir can u tell m specific relief act use only immovable property.....??
It is regarding the contract , whether for movable or immovable property
Sir pllease guide me for the book to refer for SRA
I have uploaded the vedio on it, check it
Satshriakal sir 🙏
Sir kyaa licensee ke case m sec6 apply hoga?
Yes
sir aapne bataya Neyveli Case mein plaintiff trespasser nhi hona chaiye and juridical posession doesnt mean lawful possession, toh mera question hai if plaintiff was not in lawful possession because he himself had dispossessed the owner and now he was dispossessed by owner, Is such plaintiff eligible for taking relief u/s 6? Please batayein.
Thank you sir
Sir aap hmare liye kisi farishte se kam nai..🙏
Good afternoon sir. Sir can you plz elaborate the meaning of this line :-
Mere possessory title is good enough to maintain an action under section 5 of specific Relief act. (Somnath vs Raju AIR 1970 SC 846)
How get the notes sir
Whatsapp on 9478294750
Sir do u provide online judiciary class?
Sir, Section 6 me revision ho sakta hai kya..?
[Ramesh Chand Koiri v. Chandan Koiri,2018 SCC OnLine Cal 6471, dated 19-09-2018]
Revision maintainable
Thku so much sir
Plz explain Section 6 sub-section 3 of specific relief
Koi b appeal or koi b review u/s-6 ke decision me against me file nhi kiya jayega..!
Thankyou so much sir .. your lectures are very beneficial ❤
Thank u sir
Thank you sir