Got close to 30k on mine and been through Texas and Colorado!!! She drives like a beauty, simple truck for everyday life I’m always changing oil between 4-5k miles and basic maintenance.
Hi Justin,just want to say hi from 🇨🇦 I have 2022Silverado 2.7L very happy, but price and interest is so much in 🇨🇦 how is things in Texssas, my favorite state, like to visit one day,does your diler need pickups from Canada,apriciate 🛻🍻😎🎸
I have the custom trail boss with the 2.7 and it’s more than enough. I have the 22 refresh and no issues with it and i had 4 other silverados and sierra’s over the years all v8’s . This is a very good engine and like you said most people aren’t going to tow or do crazy stuff with it .
One thing to remember about torque and HP, is what rpm those numbers actually occur at. Peak numbers are honestly kind of worth it because obviously you don't want to drive at 5600rpm for example.
I think in the mid size with colorados and the GM canyons, it’s great. But on full size due to extra weight, gas suffers a bit, that’s my only take on it.
A silverado LT with the 2.7 gets better highway mpg than a Colorado trail boss or zr2 and identical mpg to the Colorado Lt with the Turbomax and the z71 which by default uses the Turbomax. It actually is making it hard for me to justify any Colorado other than the zr2, which get this, gets significantly worse mpg than any of the road focused Silverado's with the Turbomax.
One thing worth noting the 2.7l is now covered with a powertrain warranty equal to a diesel, 5yr, 100k miles. They did this to reassure people it is built well, and it is, has many forged internals and is built like a gas powered diesel, very strong. I am considering 1, and am cross shopping it with a gladiator with a stick shift. Thanks for the vid.
I just purchased a Colorado ZR2 Bison 2 weeks ago, while I don't have the mileage of others, the Bison is heavier than this Silverado and I feel this motor is awesome. When that torque kicks in, you can really feel it.
I plan on keeping my "HO" for a long time. The 2.7L has a 2 stage internal oil separator assembly for crank case ventilation so hopefully carbon buildup wont be an issue. ill let ya know in 10 years! lol
I would not buy this as I don't see the appeal. A half ton truck with a midsize trucks engine. Personally, I don't even want a turbo four in a midsize. Weight difference might be not great but why make a half ton that is always going to be maxing itself out when you want to do half ton things. Why spend the money to have a bigger looking truck when what you really need is a midsize? You put a v8 in there and you can tow about 2000 more lbs. I don't want my truck screaming like a Honda anytime I want to do half ton things. I shouldn't be wondering where VTEC kicks in on my truck (joking). I always want more capacity than I need for longevity sake. I don't care about numbers on paper I care about HOW it makes those numbers. Of course it's the internet though so I've already had all kinds of people (as annoying as yota fanboys) yelling at me in comments because they have too much of their own personality tied up in products, tech, or just sunk cost fallacy. That's why this is such a long answer because people are asses about things. You do you, buy it if you just want a truck to cruise or you care more about 0-60 but I would never trust it and I want my tools to be overbuilt not just up to standard requirements, even if I don't use it to full potential all the time. I'm not going to count how many times I can bend a paper clip. Don't tell me how to spend my money and I won't tell you how to spend yours.
Agree. Every manufacturer putting undersized engines with turbos needs to be ignored. Their crap is overpriced, I will rebuild my V8 in my almost 20 year old truck before giving any of them a dime.
Another great video Jason, thank you. I found some interesting info about the GM 2.7 turbo engine, these are some things to consider. GM 2.7 Turbo Engine Problems The GM 2.7 Turbo engine first appeared in 2019, offering a solid base to the GMC Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado 1500. It was made for trucks but has also fit inside other vehicles shells from GM. Like all car components, it’s critical to consider everything before buying. You might wonder - are there any significant GM 2.7 turbo engine problems? If you’re interested in learning more about the issues that appear in the GM 2.7 Turbo Engine, you’re in the right place. The more you know about this system, the less surprising it will be when these issues appear. Read on to learn more about four of the most common troubles in the GM 2.7 Turbo engine’s lifespan. The Most Common GM 2.7 Turbo Engine Problems: * Carbon Buildup. Cost to fix: $175-$450 * Issues With Fuel Economy. Cost to fix: $400-$800 * Injector Failure. Cost to fix: $300-$900 * AFM System Failure. Cost to fix: $1,000-$2,000 Carbon Buildup Problem: Vehicles that provide direct injection tend to suffer from carbon buildup as time goes on. The fuel sprays right into the engine cylinder, which saves time, but leaves deposits from blowby gasses on the ports and various intake valves. In time, these can grow to a level that becomes a pain to handle while driving. They can stop fuel from getting into the system. Symptoms of significant carbon buildup in your vehicle include heavy exhaust fumes, reduced efficiency, an illuminated check engine light, poor acceleration, an engine misfiring situation, and more. Carbon buildup will typically sneak up on you, so a professional might need to take a look for prevention in the future. Cost: If you want to pay to deal with the GM 2.7 turbo engine problems, it will cost you around $175-$450 to deal with the carbon buildup depending on the severity of the issue and the experience level of the person completing the removal process. Walnut blasting is one of the most effective removal methods for carbon buildup. Issues With Fuel Economy Problem: Although not technically an engine problem that needs repair, there are issues with fuel economy in the GM 2.7 Turbo. This issue is unfortunate, as a big selling point for this component was its ability to trek long distances without suffering from an extreme need to refill the tank. Many drivers report that the issues with the fuel economy stem from the irritating start/stop system inside cars with this engine and the AFM system in the GM 2.7 Turbo Engine. These additional features are meant to help the vehicle, but they end up hindering it more than providing a boost for potential buyers. Cost: Ultimately, the reliability of your GM 2.7 Turbo engine depends on how well you maintain it. Unexpected items like the AFM could play a role, but the better care you put into this component, the more mileage you will get out of it. Paying a couple hundred a year for regular maintenance will go a long way to keep your mileage as high as possible with the GM 2.7. Injector Failure Problem: Clogged injectors are another significant issue that appears inside the GM 2.7 Turbo engine. Typically, the injectors inside the system receive exposure to high levels of heat from particulate matter and the combustion chamber. Over time, this exposure might clog the tips of the fuel injectors and prevent them from doing their job. It could even damage them if severe enough. Indicators of an injector failure thanks to a clog include an illuminated check engine light, reduced performance from the engine, a lean mixture in your fuel, lower fuel efficiency, a crank with no start, and more. If your injectors have no way of putting fuel in the right spot, you’ll struggle to have an efficient drive. The injectors must be cleaned or replaced in time. Cost: If you want to deal with your injector failure, it will cost $300-$900 to clean them off or replace critical components. Again, the cost will vary depending on the person you hire for the job and the severity of the damage. Significant buildup will take much longer to clean than a tiny amount on the tips. Different supplies might also contribute to the total price point. AFM System Failure Problem: Another common issue in the GM 2.7 Turbo engine is a possible failure of the Active Fuel Management system. This component has been around since 2019, with GM attempting to phase it out. Still, the GM 2.7 Turbo engine has the feature and can be problematic - in fact, many people loathe the addition. There are significant reliability errors in the AFM, which customers often complain about. According to chevytrucks.org, a few of the most common faults in the AFM system include lifters that don’t last very long in real-world conditions, total engine failure, excessive oil consumption, sudden stalling, hesitation when accelerating, and more. Cost: If you want to deal with the last on our list of GM 2.7 turbo engine problems, it will cost you $1,000-$2,000. Unfortunately, the AFM tends to act like a built-in time bomb in the GM 2.7 Turbo Engine system. Most warranties should cover repairs, but it’s something valuable to consider before investing in a vehicle with this component built inside its walls. Avoiding the GM 2.7 Turbo Engine Problems The best way for you to avoid the most significant GM 2.7 turbo engine problems is to keep an eye and ear out for engine troubles before they become something more significant. If you’re an experienced car person, watch and wait for serious indications and address them before they spiral out of control. Of course, not everyone is comfortable around vehicles. If you have no idea what to look for in a broken or faulty engine, ensure you bring your car to a trusted mechanic for an inspection every so often. They will be able to determine if there are any irregularities in your system and what must happen to get everything back in order.
@@ArchangelMLM 🧐🤔Excellent points you have researched !!! Have you seen the you tube videos showing the “RUBBER” oil pump belt inside the engines of the Ford trucks ??? That is the biggest # “1” reason to say “NO” way to purchasing an F-150
You talked about choosing the V8 version for longevity. Have they fixed the lifter issues in the V 8's ? I was thinking the lifter issue was the reason to choose the Turbomax. What brand & model truck these days can I expect to go 250,000 miles ?
The only 2 v8 full size truck motors available today that I think can go 250k is the ford v8 coyote in the f150 and the hemi in the ram 1500. chevy makes a good v8 but they are expensive to keep running for high miles. As is every other motor. My opinion the days of owning a truck to 250 miles are gone and not worth it. the cost to repair vehicles today as well as parts is insane. you want a 250 my best bet would be to get a ram 1500 with a 3.6 pentistar. enough power to do the work needed and a great truck. and you can replace the motor with a complete brand new crate factory motor for 7k. if you need to. But realistically my best advise is buy any turck you want. Put a 120k extended warranty on it (factory warranty, not car shield etc) and sell it before the 120k miles. Then you never worry or loose a seconds sleep over it.
@@bryanrodi2882 the beauty of the 3.6 is there are 14 million of them on the road and its a 15 year old motor that has been corrected, updated and proven to be outstanding. it will go down in history as one of the most reliable motors made once the stupid internet gets past the problems it had 10 years ago. And the motor is super easy to repair and parts are dirt cheap. That means wont cost much to keep it running for high miles.
Just wondering why manufacturers didn't offer a small 4 cylinder turbocharged engine in full size pickup trucks 20 years ago. Fullsize pickup trucks where smaller and lighter back then as well. All of the current engine technologies existed back then.
Power wasn't there from a 4t then. And 15 years ago turbos were much less reliable in a truck application. Heck even the 2.7 v6 twin exoboost was hard for people to grasp.
Depends how you define “technologies”. Yea there were turbos but they weren’t the turbo engines we see today. Theres been a lot of innovations and refinement
Way more tech today. Mostly 4 speed transmissions back then as well. Modern transmission with multiple ratios are a big contributor as to why smaller motors are able to work in bigger heavier applications today.
I think I had read that the 2.7 can be set for different amounts of power. I personally think it's pretty crappy of them to make you spend more money just to turn up the motor. It's not the same as upgrading to a larger motor. Most of it is just programming, but they use it to squeeze all the money they can from you. Ram also does this with the 3.0 Hurricane. I hope this doesn't become common.
It’s going to be cheaper and more reliable to create one engine with 3 outputs than 3 separate engine variants. And you can always spend a few hundred for a tune. Consolidation of platforms and engines is better for consumers.
@@oliverramclam6009 A co-worker purchased a Silverado turbo-max it’s a good engine he had the engine computer programmed to never go into “2” cylinder mode…. I agree I trust the GM engineers on this engine A giant 👎👎👎 to the Ford Engineers with The rubber belt inside the engines to drive the oil pumps !!
Battery power has instant torque and yes that matters moar. These are amazing machines no one wants excepting the Ford F150 which yet again not afraid to compete on both volume and price. Verdict: Dodge has figured out go big or go home really does matter now
Thats why the 1500 rams are tanking right now? Volume has dropped year over year. I was young when the dodge had the super makeover but now it is getting old to me. Just my opinion.
Planned obsolescence is horrible for the environment and ironically, it’s the epa and car manufacturers causing it. What good is two extra mpg when you have to scrap the truck in five years?
Good point. Looking at the new Tundras with China syndrome engines costing up to $30,000 (!!!) to replace, I believe many vehicles will be scrapped not because they CANNOT be repaired, but because the COST of the repair vs the depreciated value will cause them to be a technical total loss. These are not vehicles that a tinkering backyard mechanic like me is going to be rebuilding in their home garage. I have rebuilt numerous engines and even an old Ford automatic with good results, bit I would not want to even mess with these new powertrains. WAY too complex. Even Toyota techs hate doing the Tundra meltdown repairs. And cab-off is acceptable engineering these days too in doing an engine job.
@@jeanclaude7018 Agreed. It’s like they’re answering a bunch of questions no one asked. I want actual gauges and no touch screens. I don’t need a 2°f differential between me and the passenger. Give me knobs on climate controls without a digital readout. I want a column shifter and have zero issue turning a key. Power seats are way slower than manual. Keep pickup trucks naturally aspirated and ditch the emissions destroying direct injection.
@@flavio-p You nailed it. Peak dashboard for me was a Studebaker Avanti I once restored for a customer. The dash was like a cockpit, filled with Stewart Warner analog gages, made of METAL. People think I'm sick that I still like to drive my Nissan Hardbody. Tbe only electronics are the stereo and the Hitachi TBI system. The luxuries are AC and PS. I installed a MANUAL lumbar adjustment. It has a tach, but I do wish it was the SE with real oil pressure gauge. I don't know how these new rides are gonna go 40 years...
@@jeanclaude7018 Right on! Yotas with the venerable 22r get all the attention but Nissan was no slouch. Plenty of those hardbodies still in service despite “cash for clunkers” taking out a bunch of cool rides. I daily a w123. Diesel, all vdo gauges, zero electronics… I prefer it over whatever lux suv my wife happens to be driving. I only wish it had a 3rd pedal.
Does the Ram 1500 3.6 have better output than the Gladiators 3.6? I’m assuming the specs may be slightly off based off platform but seems the gladiators engine is a bit worse performance wise.
🧐 If I needed or wanted a 1/2 truck I would definitely place a Silverado “WT” with the turbo-max at the top of the list Chevy allows the “MULTI-FLEX” tailgate as a “STAND-ALONE” option 👍👍 “DISTANT” “2nd” Ram 1500 “TRADESMAN” with the “3.6” V-6 …. That being said The Ram Truck executives “PREVENTING” The “MULTI-FUNCTION” Tailgate from being a “STAND-ALONE” option on the “TRADESMAN” are petty “FOOLS” many Tradesmen and businesses with the need for a full-size truck economy version would “GLADLY” spend the thousand dollars for the multifunction tailgate. 🤬🤬🤬 For 2025 the multifunction tailgate is available on the “BIG-HORN” model if you click that option you get a pop up window, must purchase at least Big horn group “1” for additional $1,600 on top of $1,000 for tailgate.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 For that reason Ram “1500” “DISTANT” 2nd place. Ford F-150 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎 Rubber Belt driving the oil pump The # “1” reason to say no way to a Ford F-150 🤬🤬
@@Jason-Samko I’m very proud to say I have steered “4” people away from wasting their hard earned money 💵 on Ford F150’s by sharing you tube videos showing the Rubber oil pump belt.
@@Jason-Samko That goes for the Ford Ranger also 🤬🤬 all the “ECO-BOOST’s” went Rubber oil pump belt…….. as Nancy Reagan told the youth of America 🇺🇸 Just say no to drugs !!! Everyone Just say “NO” to “FORD”🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
Do the vast majority of 1500 class owners plow? Nope. You shouldn't be doing plowing with any regularity with anything short of a 250/2500, a d the vast majority of 150/1500 owners will literally never mount a plow.
It may work but it will not last period . Hell they can't even make there v8 last much less putting turbos on a v4 trying to pull stuff putting strain on the engine it will prematurely die. They would never fix the v8 and the transmissions are garbage . Dude turbos on gas engines causes wear and when you underpower a big heavy truck and make power by turbo it wears down a little engine being pushed to its limits .b
![[Live] : ONE 168 วันนี้!! "โจนาธาน vs ซุปเปอร์เล็ก"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jIN65KgJsI/mqdefault.jpg)
Got close to 30k on mine and been through Texas and Colorado!!! She drives like a beauty, simple truck for everyday life I’m always changing oil between 4-5k miles and basic maintenance.
@@justinsalazar9070 love it.
Hi Justin,just want to say hi from 🇨🇦 I have 2022Silverado 2.7L very happy, but price and interest is so much in 🇨🇦 how is things in Texssas, my favorite state, like to visit one day,does your diler need pickups from Canada,apriciate 🛻🍻😎🎸
I have the custom trail boss with the 2.7 and it’s more than enough. I have the 22 refresh and no issues with it and i had 4 other silverados and sierra’s over the years all v8’s . This is a very good engine and like you said most people aren’t going to tow or do crazy stuff with it .
@stephenrussell9518 happy to hear you love yours too!
One thing to remember about torque and HP, is what rpm those numbers actually occur at. Peak numbers are honestly kind of worth it because obviously you don't want to drive at 5600rpm for example.
2023 2.7 custom trail boss with 16,000 miles. No issues or complaints. I like that peak torque begins at 1500 RPMs.
amazing truck!
I think in the mid size with colorados and the GM canyons, it’s great.
But on full size due to extra weight, gas suffers a bit, that’s my only take on it.
@rockkstah2550 weight difference between colorado and silverado is only a couple hundred pounds. Very minimal
A silverado LT with the 2.7 gets better highway mpg than a Colorado trail boss or zr2 and identical mpg to the Colorado Lt with the Turbomax and the z71 which by default uses the Turbomax.
It actually is making it hard for me to justify any Colorado other than the zr2, which get this, gets significantly worse mpg than any of the road focused Silverado's with the Turbomax.
@@Jason-Samkolove the videos ako,I have 2.7L.very happy, but price and interest is crazy in 🇨🇦 how is in your state👍👏🛻😎🍻🎸
@brankomihaljevic706 all truck prices are crazy. Here they are running some very attractive deals on these trucks.
Not sure I’d get the Silverado but the Colorado ZR2 has my interest. This coming from a Toyota guy generally but definitely not a fanboy.
Same here. Thinking of trading my Tacoma for the zr2
@@kylejames538Just got a 24 ZR2 few weeks ago, only put 500 miles on it so far, but it’s badass. Plenty of power, drives great, and looks great.
@@gregjoubert5118 love the zr2 colorado
One thing worth noting the 2.7l is now covered with a powertrain warranty equal to a diesel, 5yr, 100k miles. They did this to reassure people it is built well, and it is, has many forged internals and is built like a gas powered diesel, very strong. I am considering 1, and am cross shopping it with a gladiator with a stick shift. Thanks for the vid.
You are correct. In the silverado its a 5/100 warranty. Bummer they dont offer the same in the colorado with the same motor.
I just purchased a Colorado ZR2 Bison 2 weeks ago, while I don't have the mileage of others, the Bison is heavier than this Silverado and I feel this motor is awesome. When that torque kicks in, you can really feel it.
@ezompetti1 congratulations on such an amazing truck. And agree to motor is amazing.
The 4.3 with a turbo would have been interesting!
Agree
I wish the Turbomax came with the 10 speed
Go watch the Getty adventures videos. He actually tested it unladen and towing, and gets into the engine as well
I plan on keeping my "HO" for a long time. The 2.7L has a 2 stage internal oil separator assembly for crank case ventilation so hopefully carbon buildup wont be an issue. ill let ya know in 10 years! lol
Congratulations on a great truck with a great motor!
I would not buy this as I don't see the appeal. A half ton truck with a midsize trucks engine. Personally, I don't even want a turbo four in a midsize. Weight difference might be not great but why make a half ton that is always going to be maxing itself out when you want to do half ton things. Why spend the money to have a bigger looking truck when what you really need is a midsize?
You put a v8 in there and you can tow about 2000 more lbs. I don't want my truck screaming like a Honda anytime I want to do half ton things. I shouldn't be wondering where VTEC kicks in on my truck (joking). I always want more capacity than I need for longevity sake. I don't care about numbers on paper I care about HOW it makes those numbers.
Of course it's the internet though so I've already had all kinds of people (as annoying as yota fanboys) yelling at me in comments because they have too much of their own personality tied up in products, tech, or just sunk cost fallacy. That's why this is such a long answer because people are asses about things. You do you, buy it if you just want a truck to cruise or you care more about 0-60 but I would never trust it and I want my tools to be overbuilt not just up to standard requirements, even if I don't use it to full potential all the time. I'm not going to count how many times I can bend a paper clip. Don't tell me how to spend my money and I won't tell you how to spend yours.
Agree. Every manufacturer putting undersized engines with turbos needs to be ignored. Their crap is overpriced, I will rebuild my V8 in my almost 20 year old truck before giving any of them a dime.
Id like an ext. cab base model with a 5 speed manual !
Mid size trucks ride like crap because of the shorter wheelbase. Give me a Silverado with the turbo max and it will do anything I need it to.
😂😂👍🏾
Another great video Jason, thank you.
I found some interesting info about the GM 2.7 turbo engine, these are some things to consider.
GM 2.7 Turbo Engine Problems
The GM 2.7 Turbo engine first appeared in 2019, offering a solid base to the GMC Sierra and Chevrolet Silverado 1500. It was made for trucks but has also fit inside other vehicles shells from GM. Like all car components, it’s critical to consider everything before buying. You might wonder - are there any significant GM 2.7 turbo engine problems?
If you’re interested in learning more about the issues that appear in the GM 2.7 Turbo Engine, you’re in the right place. The more you know about this system, the less surprising it will be when these issues appear. Read on to learn more about four of the most common troubles in the GM 2.7 Turbo engine’s lifespan.
The Most Common GM 2.7 Turbo Engine Problems:
* Carbon Buildup. Cost to fix: $175-$450
* Issues With Fuel Economy. Cost to fix: $400-$800
* Injector Failure. Cost to fix: $300-$900
* AFM System Failure. Cost to fix: $1,000-$2,000
Carbon Buildup
Problem:
Vehicles that provide direct injection tend to suffer from carbon buildup as time goes on. The fuel sprays right into the engine cylinder, which saves time, but leaves deposits from blowby gasses on the ports and various intake valves. In time, these can grow to a level that becomes a pain to handle while driving. They can stop fuel from getting into the system.
Symptoms of significant carbon buildup in your vehicle include heavy exhaust fumes, reduced efficiency, an illuminated check engine light, poor acceleration, an engine misfiring situation, and more. Carbon buildup will typically sneak up on you, so a professional might need to take a look for prevention in the future.
Cost:
If you want to pay to deal with the GM 2.7 turbo engine problems, it will cost you around $175-$450 to deal with the carbon buildup depending on the severity of the issue and the experience level of the person completing the removal process. Walnut blasting is one of the most effective removal methods for carbon buildup.
Issues With Fuel Economy
Problem:
Although not technically an engine problem that needs repair, there are issues with fuel economy in the GM 2.7 Turbo. This issue is unfortunate, as a big selling point for this component was its ability to trek long distances without suffering from an extreme need to refill the tank.
Many drivers report that the issues with the fuel economy stem from the irritating start/stop system inside cars with this engine and the AFM system in the GM 2.7 Turbo Engine. These additional features are meant to help the vehicle, but they end up hindering it more than providing a boost for potential buyers.
Cost:
Ultimately, the reliability of your GM 2.7 Turbo engine depends on how well you maintain it. Unexpected items like the AFM could play a role, but the better care you put into this component, the more mileage you will get out of it. Paying a couple hundred a year for regular maintenance will go a long way to keep your mileage as high as possible with the GM 2.7.
Injector Failure
Problem:
Clogged injectors are another significant issue that appears inside the GM 2.7 Turbo engine. Typically, the injectors inside the system receive exposure to high levels of heat from particulate matter and the combustion chamber. Over time, this exposure might clog the tips of the fuel injectors and prevent them from doing their job. It could even damage them if severe enough.
Indicators of an injector failure thanks to a clog include an illuminated check engine light, reduced performance from the engine, a lean mixture in your fuel, lower fuel efficiency, a crank with no start, and more. If your injectors have no way of putting fuel in the right spot, you’ll struggle to have an efficient drive. The injectors must be cleaned or replaced in time.
Cost:
If you want to deal with your injector failure, it will cost $300-$900 to clean them off or replace critical components. Again, the cost will vary depending on the person you hire for the job and the severity of the damage. Significant buildup will take much longer to clean than a tiny amount on the tips. Different supplies might also contribute to the total price point.
AFM System Failure
Problem:
Another common issue in the GM 2.7 Turbo engine is a possible failure of the Active Fuel Management system. This component has been around since 2019, with GM attempting to phase it out. Still, the GM 2.7 Turbo engine has the feature and can be problematic - in fact, many people loathe the addition.
There are significant reliability errors in the AFM, which customers often complain about. According to chevytrucks.org, a few of the most common faults in the AFM system include lifters that don’t last very long in real-world conditions, total engine failure, excessive oil consumption, sudden stalling, hesitation when accelerating, and more.
Cost:
If you want to deal with the last on our list of GM 2.7 turbo engine problems, it will cost you $1,000-$2,000. Unfortunately, the AFM tends to act like a built-in time bomb in the GM 2.7 Turbo Engine system. Most warranties should cover repairs, but it’s something valuable to consider before investing in a vehicle with this component built inside its walls.
Avoiding the GM 2.7 Turbo Engine Problems
The best way for you to avoid the most significant GM 2.7 turbo engine problems is to keep an eye and ear out for engine troubles before they become something more significant. If you’re an experienced car person, watch and wait for serious indications and address them before they spiral out of control.
Of course, not everyone is comfortable around vehicles. If you have no idea what to look for in a broken or faulty engine, ensure you bring your car to a trusted mechanic for an inspection every so often. They will be able to determine if there are any irregularities in your system and what must happen to get everything back in order.
@@ArchangelMLM 🧐🤔Excellent points you have researched !!! Have you seen the you tube videos showing the “RUBBER” oil pump belt inside the engines of the Ford trucks ??? That is the biggest # “1” reason to say “NO” way to purchasing an F-150
You talked about choosing the V8 version for longevity. Have they fixed the lifter issues in the
V 8's ? I was thinking the lifter issue was the reason to choose the Turbomax. What brand & model truck these days can I expect to go 250,000 miles ?
The only 2 v8 full size truck motors available today that I think can go 250k is the ford v8 coyote in the f150 and the hemi in the ram 1500. chevy makes a good v8 but they are expensive to keep running for high miles. As is every other motor. My opinion the days of owning a truck to 250 miles are gone and not worth it. the cost to repair vehicles today as well as parts is insane. you want a 250 my best bet would be to get a ram 1500 with a 3.6 pentistar. enough power to do the work needed and a great truck. and you can replace the motor with a complete brand new crate factory motor for 7k. if you need to. But realistically my best advise is buy any turck you want. Put a 120k extended warranty on it (factory warranty, not car shield etc) and sell it before the 120k miles. Then you never worry or loose a seconds sleep over it.
I agree thanks for the reply. I will look into the Ram with the 3.6. I had not considered that one.
@@bryanrodi2882 the beauty of the 3.6 is there are 14 million of them on the road and its a 15 year old motor that has been corrected, updated and proven to be outstanding. it will go down in history as one of the most reliable motors made once the stupid internet gets past the problems it had 10 years ago. And the motor is super easy to repair and parts are dirt cheap. That means wont cost much to keep it running for high miles.
If you was gonna buy a new truck, would you get new ram 1500 with the hurricane engine or Colorado ZR two with the 2.7 L?
@@frankelswick4109 for my lifestyle zr2 colorado
Just wondering why manufacturers didn't offer a small 4 cylinder turbocharged engine in full size pickup trucks 20 years ago. Fullsize pickup trucks where smaller and lighter back then as well. All of the current engine technologies existed back then.
Power wasn't there from a 4t then. And 15 years ago turbos were much less reliable in a truck application. Heck even the 2.7 v6 twin exoboost was hard for people to grasp.
Depends how you define “technologies”. Yea there were turbos but they weren’t the turbo engines we see today. Theres been a lot of innovations and refinement
Way more tech today. Mostly 4 speed transmissions back then as well. Modern transmission with multiple ratios are a big contributor as to why smaller motors are able to work in bigger heavier applications today.
I think I had read that the 2.7 can be set for different amounts of power. I personally think it's pretty crappy of them to make you spend more money just to turn up the motor. It's not the same as upgrading to a larger motor. Most of it is just programming, but they use it to squeeze all the money they can from you. Ram also does this with the 3.0 Hurricane. I hope this doesn't become common.
It’s going to be cheaper and more reliable to create one engine with 3 outputs than 3 separate engine variants. And you can always spend a few hundred for a tune. Consolidation of platforms and engines is better for consumers.
The 2.7L is built tough and built to last I trust the GM Engineers on this engine 🎉
@@oliverramclam6009 me too. 100% and gm leads today in standing behind it's customers
@@oliverramclam6009 A co-worker purchased a Silverado turbo-max it’s a good engine he had the engine computer programmed to never go into “2” cylinder mode…. I agree I trust the GM engineers on this engine
A giant 👎👎👎 to the Ford Engineers with The rubber belt inside the engines to drive the oil pumps !!
Battery power has instant torque and yes that matters moar. These are amazing machines no one wants excepting the Ford F150 which yet again not afraid to compete on both volume and price. Verdict: Dodge has figured out go big or go home really does matter now
Thats why the 1500 rams are tanking right now? Volume has dropped year over year. I was young when the dodge had the super makeover but now it is getting old to me. Just my opinion.
😅
GOT ONE. 2024... IT'S A GREAT TRUCK👍👍
Sure is! Congratulations on it.
Planned obsolescence is horrible for the environment and ironically, it’s the epa and car manufacturers causing it. What good is two extra mpg when you have to scrap the truck in five years?
Good point. Looking at the new Tundras with China syndrome engines costing up to $30,000 (!!!) to replace, I believe many vehicles will be scrapped not because they CANNOT be repaired, but because the COST of the repair vs the depreciated value will cause them to be a technical total loss. These are not vehicles that a tinkering backyard mechanic like me is going to be rebuilding in their home garage. I have rebuilt numerous engines and even an old Ford automatic with good results, bit I would not want to even mess with these new powertrains. WAY too complex. Even Toyota techs hate doing the Tundra meltdown repairs. And cab-off is acceptable engineering these days too in doing an engine job.
@@jeanclaude7018 Agreed. It’s like they’re answering a bunch of questions no one asked. I want actual gauges and no touch screens. I don’t need a 2°f differential between me and the passenger. Give me knobs on climate controls without a digital readout. I want a column shifter and have zero issue turning a key. Power seats are way slower than manual. Keep pickup trucks naturally aspirated and ditch the emissions destroying direct injection.
@@flavio-p You nailed it. Peak dashboard for me was a Studebaker Avanti I once restored for a customer. The dash was like a cockpit, filled with Stewart Warner analog gages, made of METAL.
People think I'm sick that I still like to drive my Nissan Hardbody. Tbe only electronics are the stereo and the Hitachi TBI system. The luxuries are AC and PS. I installed a MANUAL lumbar adjustment. It has a tach, but I do wish it was the SE with real oil pressure gauge.
I don't know how these new rides are gonna go 40 years...
@@jeanclaude7018 Right on! Yotas with the venerable 22r get all the attention but Nissan was no slouch. Plenty of those hardbodies still in service despite “cash for clunkers” taking out a bunch of cool rides. I daily a w123. Diesel, all vdo gauges, zero electronics… I prefer it over whatever lux suv my wife happens to be driving. I only wish it had a 3rd pedal.
Good point!
Another great video
@@rickmonster636 thank you
Does the Ram 1500 3.6 have better output than the Gladiators 3.6? I’m assuming the specs may be slightly off based off platform but seems the gladiators engine is a bit worse performance wise.
I th8nk they are the same or dang close. But have not compared the numbers directly
🧐 If I needed or wanted a 1/2 truck I would definitely place a Silverado “WT” with the turbo-max at the top of the list Chevy allows the
“MULTI-FLEX” tailgate as a “STAND-ALONE” option 👍👍
“DISTANT” “2nd” Ram 1500 “TRADESMAN” with the “3.6” V-6 …. That being said The Ram Truck executives “PREVENTING” The
“MULTI-FUNCTION” Tailgate from being a “STAND-ALONE” option on the “TRADESMAN” are petty “FOOLS” many Tradesmen and businesses with the need for a full-size truck economy version would “GLADLY” spend the thousand dollars for the multifunction tailgate.
🤬🤬🤬 For 2025 the multifunction tailgate is available on the “BIG-HORN” model if you click that option you get a pop up window, must purchase at least Big horn group “1” for additional $1,600 on top of $1,000 for tailgate.🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
For that reason Ram “1500” “DISTANT” 2nd place.
Ford F-150 👎👎👎👎👎👎👎 Rubber Belt driving the oil pump The # “1” reason to say no way to a Ford F-150 🤬🤬
@@MrJEEPJT all solid points!
@@Jason-Samko I’m very proud to say I have steered “4” people away from wasting their hard earned money 💵 on Ford F150’s by sharing you tube videos showing the Rubber oil pump belt.
@@Jason-Samko That goes for the Ford Ranger also 🤬🤬 all the
“ECO-BOOST’s” went Rubber oil pump belt……..
as Nancy Reagan told the youth of America 🇺🇸 Just say no to drugs !!!
Everyone Just say “NO” to “FORD”🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
Get the price down to 40 for an lt I would buy 1
I bet you can make that happen right now. Check my video on the deals right now on these is my truck stuff playlist
somebody needs to prove that difference in torque 50 pounds 😂5.3? Turbo max 😮
@@TrailBossTatum 😂😂
can it plow the canyon 2.7 is the turbo going to blow
@@ghostakablackpanther I would never plow with a 1/2 ton anyway. 3/4 minimum, 1 ton preferred
Do the vast majority of 1500 class owners plow? Nope. You shouldn't be doing plowing with any regularity with anything short of a 250/2500, a d the vast majority of 150/1500 owners will literally never mount a plow.
@@Jason-Samko for residential small lot had a v5 version inline engine of the canyon and the ford ranger are decent
It may work but it will not last period . Hell they can't even make there v8 last much less putting turbos on a v4 trying to pull stuff putting strain on the engine it will prematurely die. They would never fix the v8 and the transmissions are garbage . Dude turbos on gas engines causes wear and when you underpower a big heavy truck and make power by turbo it wears down a little engine being pushed to its limits .b
Never.