"Amber Heard Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence Towards Johnny Depp" Says Psychologist
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2024
- During the cross-examination of Dr. Shannon Curry, a forensic psychologist, she was questioned on whether she believed that Amber Heard perpetrated intimate partner violence (IPV) towards Johnny Depp.
#JohnnyDepp #AmberHeard #ShannonCurry
Watch Law&Crime Network NOW on TH-camTV!
tv.youtube.com...
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER: bit.ly/LawandC...
OTHER WAYS TO WATCH LAW&CRIME NETWORK IN YOUR AREA:
lawandcrime.co...
READ MORE GREAT ARTICLES FROM LAW&CRIME NETWORK HERE:
lawandcrime.com
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF Law&Crime Network TH-cam Channels:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Channel B: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel C: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel D / @lawandcrimebodycam
"I'm not an attorney, I don't understand necessarily all of these procedures."
What a classy way of saying "stop wording these in such a way to trick me"
I can't get over the fact she said she wasn't a lawyer, so she wasn't sure. The attorney just proceeds to assume the complexities of psychology.
(Paraphrasing): "mR. dEpP sAiD bOrDeRliNe AnD yOu SaId TyPe B pErSoNaLiTy"
Heard does have a type B personality. The evidence shows there is something wrong with her behaviour. Those audio recordings show she is emotional and destructive (classic for a Borderline personality).
Having a Borderline personality doesn't mean she is a bad person, but without treatment she is a danger to herself and others.
@Don't click profile photo ok 👍
Exactly! I peeped that was exactly what the lawyer was trying to do! Just another manipulation tactic
time ?
@@kintsugi2262 3:17
Dr. Curry did an outstanding job correcting Amber's lawyer in several ocassions, specially when Amber's lawyer was being misleading and asking trick questions. Kudos to her.
YES I AGREE
@@selfesteem3447 Can I call Dibs on JD? 🙃
I've hallways though he was a great actor but now I just pray for his happiness! Poor guy!
@@josephhect5339 how are you gonna make a comment like this lord Jesus grab the wheel
Loved it when she told the lawyer if they can just move on from the muffin thing. Like how many times do they have to go through that lol
Heard's lawyer thought she could intimidate her and boy was she was wrong. I loved that she would tell the lawyer she was wrong or incorrect without batting an eye.
She is excellent on the stand. She's never defensive, calmly stating facts. Reframing the implications of the attorney.
@Don't click profile photo Commence eye roll
Frrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
I've become a fan tbh. She's a pro and didn't take the smear merchant's BS easily.
?? Actually, she is making it clear she is not a neutral as suggested. She is the victim of fraud and defamation by the people who are paying her (Depp & Co.), and she is covering up the magnitude of their wrongdoing with her failure to flag their alleged crimes.
She couldn’t even understand the simple questions….
This psychologist was literally asked what a 'diagnosis' and a 'personality disorder' is (which in my opinion is common sense), but when asked what these are she answered politely. Meanwhile, when Amber's lawyer is asked about the terminology she uses (that a person who doesn't study law wouldn't know) she almost mocks her for not knowing. Says a lot about her in my opinion.
Yeah that's the part that made me lose the most respect for her. The rest of it, she was just doing her job trying to portray the psychologist as unreliable. But that part was just rude and bullying. And the psychologist takes it so well and isn't fazed at all.
@@monkiram to be fair she is a forensic psychologist, after all
To be fair, most people seem to be under the impression that personality disorder can be cured. So it would probably be a good thing to explain that it can’t, nor can it be mitigated with medication
Folks seem to get mental illness and personality disorder confused a lot. I haven’t watched that part of this interrogation or interview or whatever, I am under the impression that mental illness is quite different
@@spiralrose Actually, the symtoms of borderline can greatly reduce and almost completely become diminished through treatment and age.
I have secondhand embarrassment for this lawyer, she is so disrespectful. This Dr is just incredible, what a class act!
The cringe is almost painful
Yes, I'd definitely want this Dr. testifying on my behalf if I ever needed her in court.
Yes, and she’s sexy too
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Its a lawyer its her job. She was just trying to make the doctor very uncomfortable on purpose with her aggressive attitude and difficult questions, hoping that she would break, and trying to make people question her credibility and professionality. Its not pleasant for the doctor but she is a threat for ambers defence so they did everything they could to discredit her. Its nothing personal.
This psychologist is officially my role model and hero. So even-toned and steady, not being turned around, to the facts. Awesome job lady!
I agree with you
totally opposite vibe for me ...narc vibess
She could be a role model, and also simply a model.
@@MM-wv7ys you got that from the video???? Maybe the narc is another...
@@augustoalvarez6766 notjust from this video but because of her presentation..
The number of times this psychologist had to tell the lawyer "that's not correct" is so embarrassing.
I found it delicious that almost every time she passive aggressively went “is that correct”
Doc would just look up in the air and go nope
Exactly this psychologist was amazing 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@@ianleonard3264 Delicious? Wtf? Out of all the words in the English language to use as an adjective you pick delicious? Really? Well, ill give you props for thinking outside the box 📦👏 lol.
fr, I'm only halfway through the video and she told her "that's not correct" like 10 times.
or more.
that lawyer is at the wrong job, being a clown is way better and more fitting for her.
This was awsome!!
The fact the lawyer patronises a PSYCHOLOGIST on not knowing legal terms is beyond hilarious. This is clear evidence of a beaten case, scraping the barrel clutching at straws, I wonder what will come up next.
It's pretty clear what's happening next: Amber will lose the case. Jail is likely, but she may also end up in inpatient care. Either way, this woman shouldn't be on the streets.
"So you are aware Mr. Depp enjoys pizza, correct? You are aware Mr. Depp eats other foods, correct? Do I know what Arnica cream is? No. Because I call it Amica cream. Im having a stroke your honor." This case from Ambers end is just sad.
@@SGaming-cw7vh make me wonder if it would have been easier to settle for a lesser amount and say something like “money might do more good if used for psych treatments for Amber” and go for the “have some pity for this clearly somewhat mentally unstable person” route
This is a civil case, so no jail time. It’s likely he’ll win this case since the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable preponderance (51% likelihood the allegations are true). In criminal court there has to be a 99% chance, he could also win. However, statue of limitation says 6 years, max, for domestic violence cases. So it’d unfortunately be thrown out, and prosecutors wouldn’t pursue.
@@ironik4400 objection hearsay :D
It's hilarious how this lawyer keeps pretending like she's caught the therapist in a lie but she keeps referring to pages that just confirm the consistency of her answer.
Yeah that literally made no sense. 'You said you did this' 'No' 'Let's turn to this pointless page' 'Ok' 'Can you read what you said' 'It says 'no'' LMFAO
This lawyer sucks it
She asked the same questions over and over like the Dr would answer differently the next time she asked.
That's the whole point, to provide your client with the best defense possible. Ultimately the jury will decide.
It would be challenging to overstate how impressive Dr. Curry's testimony is. She exhibited the epitome of professionalism, class, composure, and confidence.
Perfect example of what's done in the dark always comes to light.
Women we need in the legal system 🔥
I was just thinking that.
Just how most psychologists are tbh
@@schwarz8614 - Sadly, this isn't accurate. Far far far from it. I wish it weren't so.
I love Dr. Curry. She did not let that lawyer boss her around, showing how professional and intelligent she is. An amazingly smart woman!
I was just thinking the same. This psychologist is very impressive.
To be fair....she was just telling the truth...you cant trick a truth teller; and why would the doctor get stressed over heards lawyers?....she's not Depp or heard,she's just giving the evidence as she saw it
She's not emotionally involved....dealing with mentally ill patients every day is a lot harder than dealing with heards lawyer
@@denchiC doctor 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I like Dr. Curry, she's better looking than Amber and cool as a cucumber.
you can tell she's used to listening to and responding to bats**t questions.
I know many people think ambers lawyers are bad because she’s so hard to defend(which is true) but this lawyer is incredibly disrespectful, and bases a case off trying to trick the witness into saying something that supports her case by asking overly long wordy questions that have unnecessary grammar. Overall very unprofessional on the lawyers part and Dr curry was a champion out there
Fully agree!
She was asking questions that she couldn’t even read correctly.
lawyers are allowed to play with any witness's feelings, not to a point of genuine disrespect or outright rudeness, but it is a strategy to rile someone up to get them to trip in their words. It seems that is the only strategy her team is attempting. Both attorneys/lawyers come off as semi-hostile to get a reaction.. no one is taking the bait.
thats something even good lawyers do. Kinda like a hail mary
It is possible that Amber demanded this to be done as she was paying..
This doctor is incredible. She did not allow anyone to trick her. Amazing job. She did so well in answering questions professionally.
Hehe that's what she does, she's a trained psychologist.. can't win against someone with such credentials.
Did she even answer any questions? She evaded most of them.
@@tylerkloever4442 she answered all of them, and even corrected the errors of Amber’s lawyer
@@tylerkloever4442 what do you meaning?
@@tylerkloever4442 How do you want to answer some question that has error in it?
Are Ambers lawyers so bad or is it just so impossible to make her look innocent?
Both. I hope she's paying through the nose for them.
I am going with the latter.
Lol both
at the lengths amber went to lie & manipulate her way, it isn’t normal. Even a good lawyer is unable to help back up her lies without lying and twisting it further, which could backfire. i’d say it’s the latter. Unless the lawyer can catch up with AH’s narrative and one up her in making her look innocent.
DING DING DING
I cannot believe that the judge allowed this crazy, convoluted, and non-sensical questioning by that ridiculous lawyer. She is a disgrace. More importantly, Dr. Curry is a shining example of a mental health professional with amazing composure and intelligence.
Someone needs to take Dr Curry out for drinks. She deserves it!
Well, that's probably what she thought afterwards as well, but she has no way of knowing if those questions lead up to something important for this case. At least she shot her down herself once or twice, without any objections proposed. She's probably gonna do it more as the case drags on and she finds they really have nothing but trick questions up their sleeve.
💯‼️
I don’t know whether its up to the judge to decide who should be Amber Heard’s counsel. Am I right? Just asking…….
That's not up to the judge. This is a legal proceeding, the lawyer is allowed to question the witness.
It’s interesting that her attorneys are resorting to tricks of wording and bullying when they claim to have such a strong case
The worst part of all this is they have a strong favor to win and they are still trying to pull all these tricks.
A strong case is just another way to take Amber's money.
@@Ilovegrunge123 what case are yoy watching. Depp is obviously in the right
i love it
@@Ilovegrunge123 Where is the favor? Let alone "strong"....hello?
Dr. Curry has the patience of a saint here. Being a psychologist must make it so easy to see through Amber's lawyer's manipulative BS.
big time. She reads them all like a book.
Its nothing personal its just their job. The doctor is smart enought to know that.
If Mrs.Curry wasn't married..Johnny would sweep her off her feet...she was epic!👍
She's a paid expert and I'm sure she was chosen because of her knowledge and her calm demeanor.
@@julietteoscaralphanovember2223 and the lawyer was supposed to be a paid expert too :)
I am literally star struck by this Psychologist. She is just so well spoken and articulate and elocuent. Everything she says makes sense to me. The way she stands her ground and doesn't cower to the vain hostility from the disrespectful lawyer. She stands firm because she knows she can rely on her own research, experience, and knowledge to know better than to play into the karens mental games (she's a psychologist, duh).
Yes, some faith in humanity restoring brain functions going on in her head
Totally agree! Amazing woman!
Most impressive us she doesn't fall into any of the traps laid for her.
Speaking of well-spoken, it's "eloquent," unless you're speaking Spanish lol. No shade, this comment was written well otherwise
You can’t really play mind games with an expert on the mind
I like this witness. She states the facts, clarifies those facts, when necessary, and stands her ground when the lawyer tries to trap her! She's so cool, calm, and collected!
She is also bad
@@Leonedwards01 bad why
@@syel2219 nvm
@@syel2219 I believe this fine gentleman was referring to her being 'bad' in the sense that she is an attractive woman.
Her demeanor was a complete opposite of the way the other so-called expert for Amber’s side of things acted in her witness testimony
I love how concise this woman is, especially when the lawyer tries to incorrectly guide her opinions, and she corrects them.
Yes. Love that about her also
It’s very satisfying
I would hope so she is a phycologist
If Heard is still taking "notes", she should write down that THIS is how an intelligent, normal person acts and speaks. Dr Curry is 🔥🔥🔥
🤣
Yes because she's been continuously taking notes and trying look a certain way every trail I've watched. Kinda makes me cringe.
@@victoriaphantom13 I know eight. A different personality each day.
10/10 would approach her and perform the mating dance hoping she’s impressed.
It's really hard to succeed in acting like Dr. Curry when you're constantly lying x) Her classy/smart attitude comes from straight up facts and truth, something AH lacks cruelly x)
"Can I explain what I mean?"
"No"
This is a bad lawyer. She knows if the psychologist were to explain what she meant it would have undercut whatever attack she was planning.
yeeeeeeeeeeep
i don't think she's a bad lawyer. She knows what she's doing. This amount of manipulation wouldn't be possible for less knowledgeable person.
@@W00JDA She's grasping for for anything, to try and defend her guilty client.
Thank you! That was so funny. What a scum bag that lawyer is.
@@W00JDA I guess I should have been a lot more clear. She's a bad person is what I mean. As far as being a lawyer she's actually not that great of a lawyer. At least compared to Depp's team.
Unbelievable.. Imagine trying to use psychological tricks on an actual psychologist ( a forensic psychologist) .
Lol right!
😂😂😂👌🏽
What are the psychological tricks?
@@irvingdelgado1731 it's like you're manipulating someone to do something that is in your favour by tricking them using psychology. A common example is reverse psychology.
@@irvingdelgado1731 some examples are trick questions (which lawyers like to use) or rephrasing what was said differently to change the statement unnotified.
this psychologist is the shining example of what kind of role models this world needs
She's classy af.
Agree 100%
@@marcsman07 classy, smart and extremely well prepared in her field
She's a better role model than Amber Heard
light years better... I actually doubt AH can serve as a positive role model at all🤷
Dr. Shannon Curry is a staple example of class, respect, and humility
also intelligent
@@thuanchau1985 also HAWT
@@ericohm9474
also MILF GOODNESS!
@ginger tostada. 🤣😂😂😂You’re SO wrong. She’s just a paid shill for jonny who was so starstruck she stared at Johnny the whole time on the stand. Pathetic
... and simply GORRRGEOUS❤
All I want in my life is to be more like Dr. Curry. She killed it, her confidence didn’t sway the whole time.
Don't just dream it, be it :) I believe in you, now if you do, you are unstoppable!
It's not just confidence it's competence. You can be confident in something wrong, but you can't be competent using something wrong. Dr. Curry is an absolute professional, in the truest sense of the word.
That's 15 years experience of dealing with trash lawyers, unlike what Amber's lawyer was trying to imply.
@@heehoohehehe1267 True! Wish to be that competent honestly
Lmao all you want in life is to be more like a psychologist from a celebrity court case?
The psychologist Dr. Curry would be a comfort to have on your side. She’s absolutely phenomenal. She’s assertive, and stays firm. She is clearly very smart and great at her job.
This lawyer tries to talk to a professional adult like she's reprimanding a child! She's ridiculous! Dr. Curry is definitely a prepared professional
it's the stereotypical arrogant condescension of a lawyer who actually in fact does not know anything
A prepared professional maybe, but a manipulator of the facts! One of the few careers where manipulative ways are applauded and even beneficial - being a lawyer. 😂🤣
yeah, the entire time im like can she stop fcking trying to make her seem like an invalid witness?
like if u want to see whether or not she testified about smth dont worry we'll send u her resume, CAN U STOP ASKING IF SHE TESTIFIED about stuff so freaking specific?!
She's not easily rattled.👍
Condescending and rude! It would prejudice me against Amber.
Thank God they can’t bully a professional into saying or not saying what they wish. She’s a forensic psychologist and clearly knows more about her rights to speak than they do. They can’t cut her off the way they do Johnny.
Jordan when are you coming past the ship for a nice lunch to see your old Admiral Boom.
Oh but they will keep circling back to the dinner and drinks, you’know because that part was the most important ….
@@mollyhelmm The muffins
It's not professional nor is it appropriate for a forensic psychologist to be having a dinner at the client's home. It was foolish of Amber to agree to have it done. Forensic psychologists are appropriate for a crime case this is not a crime case it's a civil lawsuit. Many people fall for this thinking that the forensics psychologist is going to help exonerate them... When would a forensic psychologist does is look for pathologies. A forensic psychologist is going to find pathologies in most everyone... But people innocently take any evaluation baking and believing that it somehow will exonerate them when would it is actually designed to do regardless of who is taking it... Is to find all of their pathologies. People believe forensic psychologists are just scientists free of bias... And that what they're doing could not possibly be anything but objective science. However that is not true. Regardless of who is being tested interpretation of facts and subjective interpretation is 100% of what a forensic psychology assessment is it's merely an opinion.. regardless of who it is about...
@@helloworld2784 THE MUFFINS! The bloody muffins, THE DINNER AND DRINKS. The sheer audacity of Johnny’s team for having a cool interview. ILLEGAL 😎
That lawyer trying to turn a clinical diagnosis into an "opinion" is a huge display of ignorance
@@thinkingallowed7042 they CAN diagnose they cannot prescribe
@@noahgm9629 ive been in therapy for over 10 years. this is absolutely correct. my psychologist can and has given me diagnoses. she cannot prescribe me medication. my psychiatrist can and has given me diagnoses AND can and has prescribed me medicaton.
@@thinkingallowed7042 not true.
@@insomniacraccoon But that doesn't mean your psychologist's opinions would be approved as a diagnosis by a medical practitioner independent of the psychiatrist's diagnosis. Any documents provided to you by a psychologist should not contain the words diagnosis prior to a diagnosis by a psychiatrist. From what you wrote about being diagnosed by a psychiatrist, it would seem your psychologist is able to refer to a diagnosis because you have been diagnosed, by a psychiatrist.
@@trillbrown3686 Yes, it is.
This is so tiring, all of it. I can't imagine what it's like to be questioned like that for such long periods of time and having to keep a sharp, logical mind at all times. Mad respect to Mrs. Curry. She's easily becoming one of the people I admire
Dr. Curry
You meant to say Dr. Curry?
@@Arwyn76 Have you ever read your own comments? Please take a break from the internet!
@@Arwyn76 jeez what a snowflake. you definitely have a personality disorder haha
This psychologist was so professional in the face of such a badgering lawyer…simply amazing…
She was amazing !
And that's it: keep it Professional. That's what clients demand of professionals is that they will trust it will remain professional and not drop into name-calling, accusations of unethical behavior (whoops, that's what AH atty did many times over that interview). She is top notch! Stay on point and the other side will look like the amateurs that they are.
The lawyer tried to say " isn't it a coincidence that JD's lawyers think AH has a Personality Disorder & now you give opinion that AH has a Personality Disorder - isn't that a coincidence?" Some people can suspect something only to have a "professional" prove it - that is a NOT coincidence!!!!! ( That is what doctor's are for!!!)
interrogating a forensic psychologist must be the toughest job for any lawyer - she knows how to control her emotions, she knows all your tricks with emotion, and she is familiar with the court processes.
For this lawyer, its hard enough to pronounce words correctly 🤣🤣🤣
@@davetrotter6735 LMAO
I would have thought the opposite. Psychology is very subjective. Must be easy to create reasonable doubt.
But to fair, I wouldn't bet against this particular witness. She's solid.
I mean, one of Amber's lawyers accidentally objected to his own question, so... 😂
@@davetrotter6735 LMAO
I lost brain cells when the lawyer asked Dr. Curry if she’s ever worked with someone with a personality disorder. She’s a clinical Psychologist…
Presumably she’s a forensic psychologist
@@ArsenicApplejuice objection. Hearsay.
I’ll sustain it
@@ArsenicApplejuice I could’ve sworn she said clinical but either way you’re still qualified to evaluate and diagnose patients
This psychologist will get even more fame , after this trial . She’s amazing we’ll spoken very calm and makes sure she breaks down everything I love her .
13:38: “I’ll read it for you if you’re having difficulties” This lawyer annoyed me the entire time with the disrespect and belittling, but goodness this part just made my blood boil. You can even see Johnny Depp and his lawyer laugh from the ridiculousness. Imagine failing so bad at your job that you need to belittle the other person you’re questioning.
She is basically a karen who became an actual lawyer.
Difficulties,? She's stumbling and reading the wrong words. Lol
What a fail
Ugh yes this lawyer is so irritating!! She is driving me nuts! Curry on the other hand is handling her in such a respectful, dignified and intelligent manner 🙌🏼
It’s her job dude. Zealous representation of the client. It’s how our legal system works.
attorneys do that when they're not getting the answers they want. they resort to grandstanding and attempted intimidation. it's almost as if Depp's counsel knew Heard's attorney was going to give themselves the rope to hang themselves with
You can‘t outsmart a smart person by pretending to be smart yourself. Dr. Curry did an outstanding job.
She’s great and unflappable
@Don't click profile photo I won't
You really don't have to be smart.
Trying to outsmart a professional that deals with people’s mind problems 😌 that lawyer was set up to be schooled by Dr. Curry
“Fake it till you make it”
Why is 15 years of psychology experience considered to be worthless because she hasn't been asked to testify on it in a court make her opinion worth any less? This is a very weak attempt to discredit this witness.
Worst part is, she responded that she has testified before. That lawyer is asking questions she doesn't know the answers to
And despite saying it was an interview and not dinner 8-9 times the lawyer continued to call it dinner and drinks. Specifically looking to discredit the witness versus trying to understand their testimony and pulling it apart.
Because she obviously shows a bias towards Johnny who wined and dined her for an 'interview' at his place.
@@alanrush1381
Trained to be unbiased, try again.
@@alanrush1381 What bias? She got interviewed by the legal team of Johnny Depp at his place and then they offered dinner to thank her for her time.
This attorney's decision to treat an expert witness in such a grating and condescending manner is either ineptitude or a strategy borne of desperation. One of the quickest ways to lose a jury is to be rude or condescending to expert witnesses. The only exception is when you know without a shred of doubt that you can discredit them and you're building up to it. Otherwise, it usually backfires tremendously.
That made me think if it's possible for jury's to have biased cases. If I was the jury, I absolutely would have not bothered to listen to AH's side and just ended it with making johnny innocent and amber the perpetrator
it is not uncommon for insecure, older women to treat younger, "pretty" females this way. With hostile condescension. No matter how intelligent or accomplished the younger woman may be, the insecure older woman will try desperately to undermine and discredit her.
I love how neutral she is, and the only thing she does is throw facts. That move of the defense "yOu ArE sAyInG tHiNgS iN fAvOr Of jOhNnY cAuSe YoU hAd A dInNeR wItH hIm" seemed to me like drown guy kicks.
What do you expect from Caitlin Jenner doing cross questioning
And whatever you do, do not forget about the muffins!
@@Tyrfingr XD
Neutral? She went to dinner and drinks at Johnny Depps house before she was employed. ‘I did not know Johnny Depp, I had seen his movies’. Contradiction, a defensive one too if you watch her response to that.
@@ladygodiva4141 she did not know Johnny Depp personally, but she knew OF him
I think it's pretty easy to understand the meaning of that, and the next two questions make it clear as well
She is amazing to watch! Just outstanding how she handled those condescending and manipulative questions. She sees right through the charade.
At the end she is smirking. Nice lady that lawyer is just a waste of time
She's a clinical psychologist after all. She would definitely see through people's outright motives. She's soo good
Firstly .... Yeah she was amazing.... No doubt in that..... She was flawless...
But the questions were absolute trash and a waste of time😂😂😂
You know, someday I might be on her sit and I would say nothing but the truth but I will sound guilty because I'm being asked misleading and manipulative questions
@@kamnooraditya4697 Hearsay questions
Dr. Shannon Curry is such an intelligent and patient woman. She spoke with candor and composure. Amber’s lawyer tried to have many “gotcha” moments but it didn’t work. How can a lawyer question a psychologist in their field? The way Amber’s lawyer spoke to Dr.curry was volatile.
*vile
Better question is how can that lawyer think they can psychologically outsmart someone living in that field with years of experience
volatile? lol
@@kvngyoun I'm guessing autocorrect from vile for some reason
It’s not as important as her patience and intelligence, but she’s a beautiful woman too!
Ambers counsel is clearly as rude and insufferable as she is. This poor woman having to take these questions it was painful to watch, she was just trying to throw her off and get her to say something harmful. I don’t know how she did it without eye rolling because I certainly would have😅
That’s why she hired them 🤣
Johnny fell in love with her, she's wonderful.
You can roll your eyes?!?!
Don’t they get dusty, dirty or damaged if you do that? How do you reattach them?
This is fascinating.
Amber’s lawyers are so embarrassing to watch 😂😂😂
Daisy?! Lmao
🤡🤡Amber's Lawyer
She has an Elizabeth Warren vibe.
yah Amber's lawyers obtained their law degrees with 2 proofs of purchase of cracker jack LMAO
Actually, given how flimsy Heard's case is, there's some all-star representation in this cross-examination.
There are women out there who are really going through domestic violence situations and for Amber Heard to make a mockery of this and to bait him. I am just not impressed with her. She has to pay for this. Does she have the money?
No even if he wins , she dont have 50 mil
She has the 7 million Depp had to pay her to get rid of her, and whatever she managed to earn during her brief & rather unimpressive “acting” career. There’s not a way in H-E-double hockey sticks she can cough up the 50 million Depp is seeking in damages, and for her to claim that her reputation or career was, is, or ever will be worth the 100 million she has the nerve to ask in damages, is beyond ridiculous.
Yes she does.. she has his money from divorce.. he is worth 300mil
You’re not impressed and I believe she’s a despicable sociopath.
She deserves jail time, to be perfectly honest.
How can this attorney think her demeanor is helping Amber’s case here? This witness is clearly professional, articulate, and not combative in any way but the attorney keeps coming at her like she’s on trial for a crime. It’s a bad look and makes the defense incredibly unlikeable.
A lawyers job is to do whatever it takes to win Playing dirty as well
They’re desperate
Yeah but playing dirty when you’re trying to prove you’re not abusive just seems like a bad move. The lawyer got caught withholding key information (it was an interview) from the jury. AH’s team set the precedent that they tell half truths to get a desired outcome. Quasi abusive behavior itself.
Because laywers like her who have this holy-than-thou attitude aren't aware of those things.
And highly biased
The irony is she recorded all this to make him look bad but she's just proving his innocence
The psychologist was so right about her language and the way she talks: she speaks in circles without really saying anything at all.
she is forcing him to love her, she doesn't want to be rejected, she stalked him even after initiating the restraint order, this is also a serious breach, she should go to prison for what she has done to that poor man, she drove him to the end of his tether
as an ancient Chinese saying goes: don't put schlong in crazy
The fact that the lawer literally scoffed when getting turned down due to speculation knowing she had nothing left she then tried to ARGUE WITH THE JUDGE that's the saddest thing ever. The amount of disrespect towards the judge is ridiculous
Come on! They are not gods
@@FeelingBeingFromTheLiving no but once they something in the court room it's over you can't convince them otherwise. It's hilariously sad bud you can't deny that
Did the lawyer actually made it up when she said “she told her husband about it” what the heck
@@monicareyes2286 That's the deliberate speculation from the lawyer. Her husband knew that she had a high profile celebrity client coming, whether she told him about having a schedule with the client or he figured it out himself is another matter, but she never told him that the celebrity client was AH. Funny thing for me is, the hubby clearly bought the muffin for HIS WIFE, at HER behest, for HER, and brought it to HER (Dr Curry), not for anyone else. Once the muffin is in Dr Curry's hands, it's her decision to share the muffin with AH, possibly out of courtesy. There's no where in this event that implied the hubby deliberately bought muffin for AH, only from AH's lawyer weird speculation.
@@ishtar0110 you’re right, I didn’t realize that. You have really good observation skills
When the Dr said "can I say what that means?" And the lawyer coldly says "no". The faces of the people in the back says it all
The laughter from the crowd too. It is both unexpected for some one to be so rude and ruthless, but completely expected from Heard's legal team.
Yeah they are like wtf hahaha
I don't know anything about law, but what is the value of asking questions if you are the one controlling the answers that are providen. If you are asking me something and at the same time stating how much can I say then there is not value at all, it is like reading a book skipping pages.
-Did you say this?
+ Yes I said that because...
- I don't care, it is a yes or no question.
Then why the f are you questioning me if you don't want a full answer.
can you give the timestamp?
@@rarasmith2544 13:04
I have to give a shout out to the “Law and Crime Channel” for not interrupting any of the trial with opinions to allow us to listen! ❤️
Right? There is a channel I had to stop listening to after not quite 10 minutes in because they were so *#!%ing annoying!
This
M L you mean the channel with audio recordings right?😂
Absolutely! There is a channel which releases snippets of them reacting to what's going on and there's a lot of speaking over what is being shown/said. I wish they'd either pipe down or pause the video before and while they react. I also wish that they'd post a link the original video with a timestamp for others to watch without the reactor.
They make separate videos for that and for discussions.
One of the most basic things you learn as a lawyer is never ask a question you do not know the answer to. I've been a lawyer for 5 years and would run rings around Amber's legal team, they are terrible. Probably costing far more than they should. Johnny is very far ahead in this case so far.
well, they are also poorly informed thanks to their client lying 24/7. i assume they THINK they know at least most answers and end up suprised to find out their client is talking bs 24/7. how would you handle such a situation?
@@DrOinkman it's a hard one to be honest. You have to defend your client no matter if you think they are correct or not. They know what she is, they know the story is all over the place. Without seeing all the evidence I could not tell you a plan, but some of the questions they got wrong where factual statements by psychologists, incorrect accounts from key witnesses they had interviewed, medical reports the list goes on. Not to mention objecting there own questions. They are ridiculous. Never be the aggressive lawyer with near rude questions and language when defending the aggressor. They should be trying to make there team, and amber seem calm and professional, the nice guys in the room. Make the jury side with you. They are doing anything but that.
@@leccy9901 Very interesting insights on this trial from a legal professional. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
This woman was waaay too smart for this lawyer’s manipulations and bullying. Hopefully the jury is too.
I love this woman's insight, attitude and professional conduct. Pure class.
Beautiful looking woman in addition to her other qualities. A star is born.
She is fantastic - so composed and very well at communicating.
its just pleasure watching her... she is so condifent in what shes saying
When the lawyer starts off trying to discredit and belittle the psychologist but the psychologist just straight up corrects all of her misleading questions and statements like the EXPERT that she is. I actually felt secondhand embarrassment.
Fortunately, the job of the lawyer is to manipulate and as a well-educated forensic psychologist she’s trained to spot manipulative tactics. 😂 She made these lawyers look like idiots.
@@BekkaSee and one could tell when she spotted those manipulative tricks. Trying to twist and turn and flip. Aaahhhh lawyers...😩😩
The psychologist did a stunningly professional job. In contrast, it seems incredibly odd that such a high-profile case would hire such a horribly bad lawyer..
what a horrible 22 minutes of watching an incompetent lawyer try to trash the credibility of a psychologist, she stood her ground and defended herself very well
Her attorneys are not likeable. And understandable that a celebrity is going to want interview to be in their realm, not a restaurant or other venue
It is very genuine that when someone's opinion is being counted then to see if they are experts or not.
Actually she didn't nees to defend herself as she didn't do anything wrong
I love how unflappable she is; maintaining professionalism despite the lawyer's obvious attempts to "trip her up" with earlier deposition statements. When you're telling the truth, you don't have to "remember" things as hard. :D
Yeah that's their ENTIRE game plan, it seems - desperately pouring through past testimonies to try to grasp onto ANY slip of wording that might POSSIBLY make their target look like a liar, even when it's really a matter of semantics or just basic human memory being not all that great when asked to remember things from years ago. If they had anything of substance at all they wouldn't NEED to try to make them look bad - they'd just be laying out reams of evidence proving that Johnny was slapping her around - but there is none - and they know it - so they try this tactic.
Professionalism after she was sold by a dish and a drink to speak in favor . That is embarrasing .
@@briza2022 If you think she “sold out” after a dish and a drink youre incredibly ignorant about how important ethics in a profession like psychology are and how as a psychologist you can lose not only credibility but also your certification and go to jail.
@@kalevipoeg6916 yep, it's a bit of a giveaway that they don't have a case or any real evidence 😁👍
@@briza2022 Okay, how are people actually buying this? I haven't been interviewed for court before, but I have definitely been interviewed a lot for other things before. If an interview is hours long, providing food isn't weird. That's really not weird. There were plenty of times where the witness could have pushed a narrative that she believed Johnny Depp to be innocent, but instead she just said that her opiniona are only what was contained in her report. If she came off as biased and then they dropped the dinner context, that'd be one thing, but it just looks like cheap shots when the witness is remaining professional.
*Edit for spelling
The lawyer's questions are so bad, the jury is probably laughing at the pathetic attempt off camera.
Lol once their heads stop spinning
Depp and his team were, that's for certain.
And the lawyer is very ill prepared.
Seriously.
THIS lawyer & AH are mimicking the same jacket! How quUTE!
"That's not quite right."
I learned a judious way to handle a situation when a person tries to unfairly paint me into a corner with inaccurate info or in a misleading manner.
i've learned the same thing. Very helpful.
I have learned so much from this video than I ever could so far. Kudos to Dr. curry
“This dinner and drinks” “it was an interview but dinner and drinks were served” “so at this dinner before you were hired” “ I wasn’t hired because it was an interview” dude this made me so mad like why are they trying so hard to incriminate her
Just because AH gets movies like that doesn't mean psychologists resort to the same.
@@Queen_KRoy well the thing is we tend to see the world the way we are inside ourselves so...
That tells a lot when trying to incriminate someone exterior ourselves of something or things that we would actually be able to do ourselves
because she wants $100 million from him.
Just trying to discredit her
My brain cells....😣😣😭😭😩😩🥺🥺 Trying to imply that Dr Curry had dinner and drinks with Mr Depp in however many ways that lawyer tried to say it... made me want to peel my face off...
This lawyer is harassing the witness to break her down, splitting hairs over opinions but this doctor is strong and professional! The witness answers the same questions over and over 😩
It ls what lawyers do they want to trick you into making a mistake
Very typical and actually somewhat mild. Watch the Jodi Arias trial if you want to see fireworks.
It seems like the witness knew exactly what the lawyer was trying to do, and found it laughable. The look on her face through the whole cross examination is very telling.
@@senajabeen1076 Well, yeah, but wouldn't you wish the attorney added some finesse to it instead of asking questions a child would predict are traps? This attorney has subtlety of an elephant.
The lawyer was just doing her job. She was trying to invalidate the psychologist’s opinion about Amber by suggesting that she was biased toward Johnny against Amber Heard. The lawyer sounded pretty angry and frustrated though. She wasn’t really getting anywhere with it.
"Can I say what that means?"
"No"
This trial has become one of the best comedies that Johnny has ever starred in!
And the entire court room’s surprised faces were literally all of us. Very clear example of how Heard’s lawyers are trying to manipulate the narrative.
Love how Dr Curry, the crowd, Johnny, everyone laughed at that. That lawyer is a joke.
can I get a time stamp?
@@tedmosby3942 13:18
@@sneharubhiniks5045 thank you mate
What is this lawyer trying to get at exactly? She’s going around in circles. She is trying to bamboozle and confuse the witness. Who could keep up with this woman’s questioning??
Yeah it’s a little confusing, I think maybe she’s trying to say that she’s disqualified for this case because
A) she has never testified within a similar case
B) she met with the legal team before and would’ve had to make them believe she would give the diagnosis they wanted to hear despite not making an expert opinion yet. Idk though court is confusing
It's to discredit the witness so her testimonials hold less weight
So basically, these "you were at his house" "he served you dinner" is basically trying to prove that she's chummy with johnny and is biased. That's BEYOND insulting, she's questioning the psychologist's professionalism. Even if she managed to prove that, that's an INCREDIBLY weak evidence
Well, I think thats a strong stretegy to be honest. Of course it might be cheap, but they have to do something to put against the diagnosis of the doctor. And the best thing is to look her being biased. And even if they manage to get doubt in the jurys head, they were kinda successful.
@@HolyNarz they were only successful in getting that into YOUR head lol
@@cutieworldwideee Explain how are reading that out of my comment?
@@HolyNarz Yeah asking her if she thinks Johnny Depp is a good actor as well lmfao
Her credibility as a witness is pretty questionable if she has been having 3-4 hour dinners with him and his legal team. There is no doubt about that regardless of who you think is in the right or wrong in this case.
This judge is so patient. To tolerate the idiocy of Heard's team. Gawd
One might even say biased.
lol I'm huffing and puffing and rolling my eyes. I couldn't have been in that court room.
@@nylotus my heart goes out to Johnny having to relive this garbage but the witch should pay
@@jenh6247 Lets just hope she really is patient.
that’s one word for it
The fact that regular non-lawyer people can see how incompetent amber’s legal counsel is, is giving me lifeeeee lol
🤣🤣
The problem is that they are grasping at straws, they have no case and are trying desperately to find something to save their case, they are likely great lawyers but they've been dealt the shittiest of hands.
I think they know very well who their client is and are playing the "bad guy" to please her (and get paid).
Be aware that profiles like AH usually take pleasure in not paying people, or paying very late, or suing their own lawyers... so her lawyers are in a complex situation.
@@DakonBlackblade2 they’ve also been caught lying to the court, and being shady
Theyare not incompetent. What else can they do.
“Did I read that correctly?”
“Uh, it says ‘perpetrated’, but otherwise yes”
This is both embarrassing and extremely entertaining to watch, Dr Curry has a solid handle on this
Her attorney is so rude to the judge: “That’s not speculation”, after the judge said it was.
Ongg like who do you think you are woman?
"but it goes to bias"... Judge is like, I heard you. I said no. Move on.
Well the judge sustained the objection so...lol
The attorney is rude period not just to the judge
The attorney getting shut down was so satisfying to see her stammer that in all honesty. She wouldn't have started "B-B-But that's not speculation" if that objection didn't monkey wrench one of the last avenues available to her to try and trash this psychologist's reputation.
A lawyer playing mind tricks on a professional psychologist is hilarious to watch😂 it's like watching someone arguing subjective scientific hypothesis with an astrophysicist who literally wrote the objective truth 🤣
No, science, especially physics, can never be "the truth". We can create models that will approach what we observe as close as possible, but we'll never know if it's the truth. There isn't some grander being that will one day tell us "yes, that's it, you found the real theory of gravitation." That's why they're called theories.
That said, I liked your comment and I got the idea :3
It's like a coach trying to teach Messi how to play soccer.
@@katerinapatiniotis5598 and a hockey coach at that
Man she's trying so hard 🤣
@@elaineelaine6418 lol nothing you said is correct and it’s sad 9 lost souls upvoted it. There have literally been thousands of instances where scientists were able to prove their theories as true. That said I am being a little bit assinine as you’re specifically honing in on physics. Of all the scientific fields physics probably contains the most theories that will never be 100% proven to be truth for various reasons that can be summed up as it’s not realistically feasible.
This psychologist is so knowledgeable and well spoken. I could watch her testify all day.
Facts yesss
Me too
She keeps getting her to read previous statements as if what she reads will be conflicting her current answer....yet she is just proving just how consistent all her answers are.
This is fabulous for Johnny 🧡👍
The audacity of Amber’s lawyer to say “no” when the psychologist asked if she could explain what something meant 😂 her legal team is so desperate, it’s embarrassing
It's actually a shame to all lawyers to have such bafoons working in the field, they try SO SO hard to get this case over to Amber to win. (frankly I'd be surprised if she won). But they have nothing but speculation, hearsay, no real evidence, going AGAINST a professional Psychologist and asking 10.000 of the same questions.
I really hope the jury can see through all this BS and call JD as the winner.
Timestamp?
@@dataengineer4424 around 14:35
Whoops sorry, 13:10
@@dataengineer4424 13:18
She was trying to discredit this poor woman the whole time... She stood her ground! This case is full of heroes!
Yeah when they know they can't win their aim is to discredit the witnesses especially the ones that hold the most weight. But in this specific witness she failed at every corner and I loved Dr Currys slight smile whenever the lawyer was being sneaky and trying to make her slip up but failing. I'm sure the jurors saw that too.
It's not a knock against her, its a defense attorney's job to discredit the testimony of the prosecution's witnesses. In my opinion Ms. Heard is guilty but she has a right to a defense same as anyone else
@@shamuscrawford does anyone here thinks amber heard has something to be defended for? Cause i don't, and I'm starting to wish you don't either lol please
Dr. Curry be looking like an actual lawyer instead. Very professional, truthful, smart and accurate in facts. One of the best testimonies in this trial! 🙌🏼🙏🏼
"you're incorrect, that is not correct" this lady is really great, calm, answering accurately and with such a sens of profesionnalism, she's not arguing and just being a better person concerning law and commitment to her own work than this person who is trying to pretend to be a "lawyer"
"Trying to pretend to be a 'lawyer'" is a bit harsh.
They can only work with what they have, which is basically nothing. They still have to perform their job to the best of their ability, which they are.
The lawyers know they’re losing. They win by asking and baiting with trick questions to “sway” the jury. But even the jury is confused when the lawyers can’t even pronounce a word and jumble these questions.
This woman, Dr Curry, defines role model. I wish I had even half of her patience and intelligence. I love her. I need her to teach me her ways. ❤️❤️
For a start go to dinner with drinks and Johnny Depps house and then tell me you are unbiased.
@@ladygodiva4141 I’m not commenting on the case as I’m neutral. I don’t know the folk involved personally so can’t. I’m commenting on Dr Curry as an excellent witness and phenomenal professional. I need this in my professional life.
Her precision and accuracy in speech prevents the lawyer from derailing her -- it's truly impressive.
@@ladygodiva4141 her opinions were based off of the evaluation and results. never once has she claimed ANYTHING in favor towards depp. i can agree that such things are capable of happening but if you listen to everything she has said, coming to the conclusion that she is biased towards depp is a poor judgment and understanding on your part
Sexy too 😂
i love when an intelligent, cool-headed, witness can handle attorney tricks and bullying.
Like someone pointed out, the problem is the lawyer is treating a grown mature intelligent woman like a child. Amber is in for a world of hurt from the jury the media and the fans.
Can't believe how dismissive she's being, it's like she's asking a groundbreaking question stopping the psychologist in her tracks but it's the opposite. Surely the judge can see straight through this whole ruse? It's been happening for days now haha
This Karen Lawyer is so rude and offensive and she is not helping Amber's case.
@Don't click profile photo dont were not .
I know, if she has a real question she should just ask a normal question on a normal tone.
@@user-ws8uw2jy2w Jury will decide, but I imagine the situation is looking in favor of Johnny Depp. Lawyers attitude is not looking favorable for the jury I imagine.
She is a role model for everyone. Extremely competent and smart, obviously loves her job, classy beyond measure, confident, gorgeous, empathetic. Everything that AH fakes to be. I wish every person on this planet would strive to be more like Dr. Curry.
You hv lost ur heart haven't you😁😁❤️
@@zeolite889 I'm a woman and agree beyond measure. she is a beautiful classy woman.
@@martinemikita9281that she is
Wow… you just know her completely in and out from her testimony, huh.
Like you’ve known her for 20 years. What a ridiculous comment.
I mean I like the way she answered the questions and all but I don’t know her personally so I can’t really say I wish every person ON THE PLANET should be like her.
Lol!!! How absurd. What a strange thing to say, it’s mind boggling how ridiculous that is….. did you even read your comment? Did you read what you wrote? R u feeling ok?
@@anak6940 All of us has flaws and issues, but that doesn't matter that we should't strive to be competent, smart and classy. This woman exemplifies all of that during that particular testimony and surely I would prefer all of us to try to be like her in that video rather than to be like you in your comment. You come off as jealous, condescending and manipulative, much like AH's lawyers. I don't even have to know you for 20 years to get those vibes.
Amazing job by the psychologist. Well spoken, no hesitation and didn't get tricked by the lawyers leading questions. I'm a fan.
That attorney is so freaking rude, I am surprised no one shut her up. She wouldn't let the Psychologist finish her sentences. Why was the Judge allowing her to get sway with this.
I couldn't believe the passive-agressive line: "I'll read it for you if you're having difficulty" and just flat out telling her "No" when the psychologist asks whether she could explain what she meant.
Becuz judge is on amber sude..see all the utube court case..shes siding with amber and their team.
@@normacolon9618 It doesn't mean she has to present such a terrible argument. It's only damaging to Ambers side.
That's what they're paid millions of dollars to do. Court rooms are hot, contentious places, the more you pay the lawyer, the better and more ruthless the lawyer and service will be.
Win or lose amber already destroyed her name
I'm sorry that Dr. Curry had to put up with this, but I'm heartened by this attorney's clownishly hostile performance because that tells me they're losing this case and they know it :)
Bonus golden moment @ 20:46-22:22 Lawyer makes insinuation; Depp's team object that it calls for the witness to speculate; judge sustains; lawyer _snaps at judge_ "that's not speculation!"; judge sustains; lawyer woolgathers for several seconds; lawyer adjusts her tone "it goes to bias your honor"; judge sustains again. WOW. She managed to alienate the judge and make herself look like a fool at the same time. I'd almost think she was on Depp's payroll.
The lawyer was kept saying “that’s your opinion” to trick her and I’m glad Dr. Curry corrected by saying “my answers are based on facts and evaluation”.
The fact that she corrects Amber’s lawyer is just delightful
Heard's lawyer, as per usual, is excruciating to listen to. Her style of questioning is so rambling and convoluted that it's almost impossible to discern what the question even is. You can even see Dr. Curry physically struggle to follow along, and she's actually equipped to answer the questions.
They just proove time and time again that they have literally zero evidence, not even suspected evidence they could build the case around, so they're trying to make the situation as confusing as possible in hopes somebody is gonna say something they then could loose or, in the case of Johnny, is going to loose his temper, so that they could point their fingers and say "AH HA! Here's your evidence! He is agressive!"
I thought it was just me that was having a problem following through. The questions that attorney made were so bloody obnoxious and long and made zero sense to me that not even halfway through I just lost track of what was happening
convoluted!!! yes that is the perfect word.
Well, the attorney needs to learn the difference between bi-polar disorder and borderline personality disorder because she asked 2 different questions and expected her to answer the same for both. If she was trying to discredit her on double speaking, she failed miserably.
Yes that was sooo bad
The questions literally made Amber's case worse. These lawyers do not know what are they doing.
They're in complete shambles and it continues to show everyday of this trial💀
I think it more borders on the flaws in Heard's defense. Her entire defense NEEDS to be that Johnny Depp is abusive. She backed herself into a corner with the accusations. Since Johnny is able to prove that these statements are false and deliberate, she's only got one option to win: make his rebuttals seem unreliable. She doesn't want to plead guilty as that will ruin her credibility since she's a DV advocate, and it seems she was the abusive partner. She has to discredit Depp and stop him from stating his case. This leaves very little the defense can do besides objecting everything and trying to exhaust the witnesses to cause an (unprofessional) outburst. So far, Depp has a case where a majority of the outcomes are in his favor.
They did their best to discredit this dr.
It's not that the lawyers don't know what they're doing, it's that they're scrambling trying to have any legs to stand on in this case when they have none.
Depp's lawyers must be thinking 'please Heard's defence team talk some more..the more the better' lol
Attorney: “You’re tired of getting cross examined by me, correct?”
Psychiatrist: “that’s correct”
**LOVE THE REPLY!!!**
Objection, your honor. Hearsay.
@@patricknelson 🤣🤣🤣
That is absolutely brilliant 🤣🤣
Bredehoft brought up court documents from February 2021 from Depp's attorney filed in February 2021, stating Curry would testify to Heard having borderline personality disorder, making false allegations and being a perpetrator of intimate partner violence. However, she did not meet with Amber until December 2021.
The ‘psychiatrist’ is a fraud.
This is a very good example of how attempting to hector a witness completely backfires when the expert witness is genuinely an expert in their field, and the lawyer is not. The attempt to smear the psychologist with being overly familiar with Mr Depp was rather pathetic, and clearly not true. The only thing this lawyer achieved was to make Dr Curry's testimony look even more solid, and Amber's case weaker. She should have shut up and sat down earlier.
Heckle*
Yes. Imagine going on and on about Dr Curry having dinner and drinks with Johnny Depp when everyone knows that his entire Legal team was also present!!
Talk about hitting below the belt!
Personality disorders require the pattern of behavior to be present by age 18. You CANNOT and I repeat CAN NOT develop a personality disorder in response to trauma at 35 years old. It is not possible. This lawyer should be rightfully embarrassed for her line of questioning.
This already made no sense before
After reading your comment and the way you worded it, makes the idea that you can develop a personality disorder this late in life in response to trauma 1000x times more idiotic.
What are you talking about? The idea that it is literally impossible to develop a personality disorder (there's no such clear definition just fyi) after the age of 18 (just couldn't be 22) is not a thing.
@@tffvn4492 It is a thing. The behavior pattern that constitutes the personality disorder needs to be present before or at onset of adulthood. Quoted from the DSM5:
"The pattern is stable and of long duration, and its onset can be traced back at least to adolescence or early adulthood."
During my clinical psychology degree, practitioners giving lectures on personality disorders generally told us that the behavior being present by the time one enters adulthood (age 18 in my part of the world) will make up 99% of all PD cases.
If you have a proper understanding of personality disorders and the intense dysfunction they bring, you will understand why it is so unlikely that such a large qualitative difference (going from no to a PD) would occur in middle adulthood. Being diagnosed later in life happens frequently, newly developing one is practically impossible.
@@glittery8862 Again, no it is not impossible.
@@tffvn4492 Then how would it be possible, if I may ask?
The level of disrespect that the lawyer presented to Dr. Curry during this entire cross(?)examination is unbelievable. She could barely avoid tripping over her own words when asking questions, but she's in perfect tune when belittling Dr. Curry's responses.
The messy haired woman was like a deer in the headlights from the moment she was exposed for being wined, dined and given flattery to give her testimony.
When was she belittling Dr. Curry?
@@nun_ya_bizz for example: when she said "Ok I'll read it for you if you're struggling".
@@somebodyyoudontknow3980 yeah i hadn't finished it when I asked, but yeah I saw that.
@@Bubba__Sawyer didn't know that was a prerequisite to asking a question. I would prefer the cliff notes if possible please.
She is an incredibly smart and confident women. Deals very well under pressure.
Well, shes a specialist psychologist, she knows how to handle people.
I'd be fuming.
I'm gonna be that guy who points out that she's also a smokeshow
@@Nadzap AGREED SHE'S SO PRETTY AND SMART LOVE HOW GOOD HER RESPONSES WERE SHE WAS SO CALM AND COLLECTED AND PROFESSIONAL
When she ACTUALLY corrected the lawyer when she asked “if she read that correctly” was ICONIC. PERPETRATED
I know right. Cannot stop smiling!
Ice cold. I loved it.
timestamp?
@@PsychH0e- 9:27
I wish she would have answered "no" when asked if she read that correctly
The lawyer trying to play psychological games with THE psychologist.. THE AUDACITY
Lawyer vs. scientist. I'd be terrified to be in her position. As scientists our duty is to present empirical evidence, and no opinion goes into our work. Professional judgement maybe, but most of the time it's based on standardized qualifiers and our personal views can't even influence that. Dr. Curry did a great job standing her ground and staying objective.
Wow, how insulting it is to think that a professional can be "purchased" or "influenced" by sharing a meal.
She was referring to a private meal where she might've been offered something more.
Oh, but it wasn't a "meal". It was "dinner and drinks" 🤔🤔😂😂
To me it's just basic manners to offer food and drinks when you invite someone for a meeting. That lawyer is reaching by trying to make it sound like a bribe 😂
@@karishmadesai1408
Furthermore she cut everytimes in if the doctor tried to explain a circumstance more precisly.
That's just awful and unprofessionell. (well at least in my eyes)
@@karishmadesai1408 duh, people making out like they had a party
How annoying was the way the lawyer questioned all the time the professionalism of the Doctor, after her previous statement (with such precision) and all of her formative years. The lawyer questions sounded very insulting for a person of such formation
To be fair, from what I've read she's not really qualified for the job.. Heard's already won twice. Her lack of acting talent is the best defence she has.
for real... not her lawyer defaming a doctor in a defamation lawsuit smh
She tried (the lawyer) to take over. She ended up being silenced at the end!
@@alfsmith4936 What did Heard win?
It's annoying but a common defense counter is to discredit the expert witness
How does a drink being served with dinner at a 4 hour interview where they are all grown ups speaking to each other show bias? This doctor can’t have a drink with the meal whilst being interviewed? What a joke. Depp called her borderline personality disorder and this doctor after an extensive evaluation decided to use that because he said that? I mean is that what’s she’s getting at? The tests the doctor administered are what picked out the bpd she didn’t just pick it out of thin air. The whole muffin thing was embarrassing.
This attorney uses a tone as if she's proving points when she just serves up a word salad of convoluted statements using double negatives trying to intimidate and confuse the witness This witness is rock solid and that dippy lawyer at 60 plus years old and who sounds like she just passed the bar exam is no match. It's embarrassing listening to her stumble all over herself while trying to sound quick minded and astute. Good Lord. AH will likely say she wasn't properly represented when she loses this case and she really wasn't. But good attorneys will at least avoid alienating the jury with an attitude meant to distract from their lack of proof that the op-ed didn't harm JD. She really underestimated the jury's intelligence.
any normal lawyer would avoid clients like amber heard least they wish to stop their career
I personally feel like she was trying to come off as confident and competent, for the jury and also to fluster dr curry.
But to do that she had to be purposefully obtuse and complicated, which made her come off as sketchy.