Thermal Comparison 2020 - Pulsar Thermion XQ50 PARD SA45 IRAY XEYE E3Max & Night Tech HD-25 & XD-35

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
    @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Call to action - If you would like to see the continuation of TH-cam channels like mine or others. PLEASE consider joining Patreon for further support.
    www.patreon.com/user?u=37396112

    • @starquake7909
      @starquake7909 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why don’t you enable Adsense?

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@starquake7909 I certainly did mate. TH-cam unfortunately deem a lot of firearms or hunting content as not suitable for advertising.

    • @mrbrown3546
      @mrbrown3546 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Joined to support your content mate.
      Never been on patreon before so it was a little pain to sort it but I'm now on.

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Really appreciate it mate. Yes the whole thing is a bit different. Was the same when I set it all up originally. Whole new thing 🙄

    • @kell7195
      @kell7195 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Odysee and Bitchute my dude

  • @MrTilbey
    @MrTilbey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Another great review Nathan .
    I have the hd 25 and it does the job for the price .
    I can spot foxes at 250m then id them with my nv .
    When money permits will get the next step up but for 1600 bucks its a pretty good start .
    Hope to get some foxes with the pard 008lrf this break as i m back from work .
    Keep up the good work mate .

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree mate. At $1600 they are an awesome gateway thermal. Compare a HD-25 to a FLIR Scout or Leupold LTO tracker and the it'll smoke the toy units. I'm still getting used to full ID with a thermal on my rifle. Pro's and con's but NV is easier on static targets to ID.

  • @garygunner
    @garygunner 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great stuff Nathan, was a bit shocked by the size of that python, spitting venom on the last clip🤣🤣🤣. Have had the Night Tech 50 for a while now and find it an excellent spotter. Thermion XM50 due this week. Getting excited.
    Keep the great videos coming and stay safe through these challenging times.
    Kindest regards Gary Gunner.

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You'll love that kit mate. Be a whole new gig running all thermal. Good times ahead for you 🦊

  • @gametrailfilms2067
    @gametrailfilms2067 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well done boys it’s great to see them compared back to back

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cheers Steve. You'd have still made the same decision 😉

  • @edwardberryman5680
    @edwardberryman5680 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NIce honest review with no pretences, cheers for the upload and putting the effort in!

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cheers mate. All three of us figured it will be a useful comparison. Regardless of brands etc.

  • @cato7669
    @cato7669 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great vid Nath, I was happy to see how good the Pard stacked up against the Thermion, now I just need to rob a bank😉

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah it's a bloody financial rabbit hole. The PARD was quite good. The video doesn't really show that at all. It's terrible TBH but was as good as we could get under the circumstances.

    • @martinstiastny7679
      @martinstiastny7679 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rob a bank ? Well, if you're looking to be restricted, locked down, abused, ridiculed, and chastised . . . I can introduce you to my X wife. God be with you.

  • @tomsullivan5874
    @tomsullivan5874 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pretty cool that we have a common friend Nath. I went to school with the bloke with the black jumper and glasses 👌🏽👍🏽. Thanks for showing this stuff mate, I have been tempted to get something, and now I feel a bit more informed. 🇦🇺🇦🇺👌🏽👍🏽.

  • @thetraindriver01
    @thetraindriver01 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great review, good to involve your mates impressions too 👍

  • @ozzieroger8121
    @ozzieroger8121 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Some serious money sitting on the tailgate. Nice review, cheers Nathan

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks mate, was a fun night to line them all up as a Joe Blow user

  • @marksedgley3888
    @marksedgley3888 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey mate. That’s excellent information and loved the out takes at the end, good to hear some good old Aussie humour……. Looking into getting a thermal scope, I need to do some serious research before paying big bucks?

    • @fiaziqbal3279
      @fiaziqbal3279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mate won't listen to anybody. Mate is busy with Thermal scanners

    • @fiaziqbal3279
      @fiaziqbal3279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you've got good budget then go for Pulsar Thermion 2 XP50 Pro with closed eyes. Best in the west

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's what I'm running now, and a Helion 2 XP50 Pro 💥

  • @antcorke4485
    @antcorke4485 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The new Pulsar Thermion XQ50 (384x288) has a much better image than the Thermion XM50 and requires far less refreshing. I think the new Thermion has the latest

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The XQ38 Axion looks like a great little scanner. I'm certainly keen to have a play with one.

  • @stevegray4012
    @stevegray4012 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    great info, thanks. I have Thermion XQ50 as well, You mentioned the vertical lines and having to do a refresh quite regularly, the image in mine starts to lose detail within a minute or so, the Auto refresh happens every 1 minute which is a nuisance when the screen freezes, how do you get around that? I've started using semi auto.

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I run it in semi automatic 👌. Higher humidity I find makes it need a calibration more often too.

  • @gregchapman9284
    @gregchapman9284 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NHG 👍 nice work mate cheers

  • @ozpestadelaide2715
    @ozpestadelaide2715 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi
    Firstly thank you for your videos. You have inspired me to do more night shoots. I already have a Pard IR scope on my impact. This works well but I need to step up to a Thermal Scope. What would you recommend. I mainly shoot pigeons and rabbits for my pest control company. My budget would top out at $10k.

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi mate. Have a look at my more recent content. Heaps has changed since this older video. I run NV mostly for my small game pest control.

  • @MrBenski81
    @MrBenski81 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ohh mate, you need to step up into the Pulsar XP-50 series scopes and the Helion XP-50 Gen2 or Night-Tech XD-65pro monocular. Like you said, "buy once, cry once". You'll love it!!

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Some day I might. But ATM it's all working well 😉. And I'm a enthusiast, not a pro getting income. I'm already way down the rabbit hole 😳

  • @FeralAnimalControl
    @FeralAnimalControl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Naith - appreciated, only wished I had seen this before I bought mine, as my review shows on the Nite Tech 50.

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's a bugger eh mate. And exactly the reason we put it together as a bit of a gauge for others.

  • @redbaron9365
    @redbaron9365 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this comparison.

  • @tonyforrest5290
    @tonyforrest5290 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nath, seems the whole world is buying Thermals. Short supply in the major shops. Was looking at the XD 35 but seems may have to settle for HD 50 Lite. Is there much difference between them? Not concerned with recording events.

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Tony. I watched this last week that didn't favour the HD-50 very well at all. If your in that $3k realm the PARD SA35 is well worth a look too. Have a guy I know that can get them. th-cam.com/video/1wIV5cSs5CE/w-d-xo.html

    • @marshallhunts7686
      @marshallhunts7686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks Nath, I can help you Tony if you are keen on the PARD gear if your interested drop me an email adam@mwbaust.com

  • @tomnoyb8301
    @tomnoyb8301 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Both B&H and OpticsPlanet list Pard SA62 as 640x480 sensor; has the sensor been upgraded since two-years ago when this vid was made? Both also listed Pard as a scope, not a monocular? What might be the max caliber Pard could reliably survive?

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Heaps has changed with all the devices in the last two years. The new SA62 is only just hitting the shelves now I believe but I know little about it.

    • @georgeg8106
      @georgeg8106 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s the scope for me when I can get my mits on one nath your a better shot than Simon Whitlock

  • @jonoj7666
    @jonoj7666 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparo 👍 only thing I'd add is the prices... great job keep it up 😊

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks mate. I did think about that but it's a point that fluctuates a fair bit with tech changing, clear outs etc. A good example is the HD-25 Lite. Currently they have been on a big sale for $1600. But 3 months ago they were around $2200 ish I recall.

    • @jonoj7666
      @jonoj7666 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@EDGEoftheOUTBACK fair point 😊👍
      I'd just say "at the time of purchase" and "shop around as prices vary and go on sale"
      That way you can add what alot of ppl would think is vital information even if it is a rough guide, especially for ppl who arnt familiar with these new fandangle wizzbang dohickies 😅👌👍 but again, great vid n keep them up 🤠👍

  • @robincoker225
    @robincoker225 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks guys, some very interesting info

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I reckon it'll be something that will help a few out in the same boat we have been in the past.

  • @davidzeegers6583
    @davidzeegers6583 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great vid guys ! Happy hunting

  • @BruceBoppoTiemann
    @BruceBoppoTiemann 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think you have a typo in the captions. At 8:05 you give 100 m for the Thermion XQ50, but then again at 8:16 you also give 100 m. I think you meant 200 m for 8:16.

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I could have mate. It's a lot of information to retain and repeat in the clips.

  • @starquake7909
    @starquake7909 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretty good photography. Could you elaborate on some details?

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What details were you after. Happy to help if I can.

  • @fiaziqbal3279
    @fiaziqbal3279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks mate

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Happy to help

    • @fiaziqbal3279
      @fiaziqbal3279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EDGEoftheOUTBACK Just one favor. I'm thinking to buy Infiray E6Pro V3. What's your advice on this one?

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      On the InfiRay E6 scanners, I prefer the FOV on the E6+ version. The Pro is a bit narrow for a scanner at the magnification.

  • @bigtrev761
    @bigtrev761 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🇦🇺😎👍That video was good big fella. I’ve got a HD 35 NightTech and i often wonder about the other products. The next step is the scope. Probably a Pulsar…Check this out ( PVS 14 Nightvision ) I’ve heard these are good and reasonably cheap…Great video, interesting

  • @EagleBayNightSupplies
    @EagleBayNightSupplies 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think there is either something wrong with the camera settings or the settings on the pard. I got great detail in my Pard SA19. Not a big hot blub as you experienced.

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There was limited detail. But noticeably less than the others. They guys have 3x SA45's between them. They are all functional and the same.

    • @EagleBayNightSupplies
      @EagleBayNightSupplies 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EDGEoftheOUTBACK Okay, do you have the recommended settings? Har you tried using the "sky" mode?

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I didn't have a whole bunch of time with the PARD, only the short time we took this video. Should get another play soon where I can try more things.

    • @EagleBayNightSupplies
      @EagleBayNightSupplies 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EDGEoftheOUTBACK Check out my video that is called Pard SA19 "sky". At the end you get a little taste of what it looks like. It gets very easy overexposed and only shows a white blob when recording with a phone trough the eyepiece.

    • @pimtaffijn4735
      @pimtaffijn4735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I tryed the pulsar xq 38 and the pard sa45, much more detail with the pard sa 45

  • @Liam-ql7tr
    @Liam-ql7tr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lol nice ending

  • @hhhydra2397
    @hhhydra2397 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you see through walls?

  • @69Salama
    @69Salama 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i have ATN thor 4 and PARD sa45. pard is much better. this video gives the viewer a completely wrong picture. pard is much more accurate than what the video looks like!!!

    • @EDGEoftheOUTBACK
      @EDGEoftheOUTBACK  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I did say it's a poor representation. Certainly not trying to discredit the SA45, it seems a great device.

  • @cuzo4x4
    @cuzo4x4 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It ain’t cheap to get into

  • @stihl888
    @stihl888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Stingy man pays twice and often thrice!