and whom exactly is going to force social media to stop? How dumb is the rest of the World that you stupid mofos dont understand Freedom in the least... Govt and Corporations are totally different things. Corporations in a Laisse-Fair system of Govt are simply another INDIVIDUAL PERSON making a transaction that you both agree on. Socialists stare in blank silence as they try to digest what I just said... Of course their response will be pure stupidity because they all think Govt and Corporations should be partners against free people....
FB had no choice because federal would have to investigate them under foreign interference. Trust me FB did not do this out of the kindness of their heart.
I suspect the fact checkers accreditation was no longer valid and given they received money from Facebook and given the clear cut bias and relationship to the ABC there may be ramifications around foreign interference in elections. Terrible look for ABC and RMIT.
@@dumpstersanchez5205yet nobody can explain anything about this “ advisory body”. There are a number of legitimate questions about its make up, roles, responsibilities, powers and so forth that the people deserve to be given answers to BEFORE they vote on it. It’s the detail that needs to be explained first and it seems fir some reason the government is afraid to do that. The Voice offers nothing that can’t be done right now by legislation so if it truely is about outcomes why is the government not using the power it has now? The most dangerous thing you can do is hand anybody more power when they fail to use the power they already have.
Nicely done Sky News. You have a very intelligent, and just as important, a caring and trustworthy team. Thank you to you all. Best wishes Jason from Melbourne Victoria.
"Censorship is contagious, and experience with this culture of regulation teaches us that regulatory enthusiasts herald each new medium of communications as another opportunity to spread the disease." Robert Corn-Revere
I've read through the first 26 pages of the documents released under FOI. I've skimmed over and read parts of the remaining ~100 pages of notes. It is very clear to me that: * Page 1 is a summary of the following 25 pages. * Pages 1-26 are the full statement. * There are roughly 8 pages worth of footnotes and diagrams within those first 26 pages, which equates to the 18 pages stated by it's co-creators. Anyone who claims to have read the document and still says it is 1 page is a liar. They're either lying about having read it, or lying about the contents. Those claiming the other 25 page are meeting notes are lying or haven't read it. Those notes are on the 100 pages following the 25. There shouldn't be any debate about this. It's bloody obvious the moment you read beyond page 1. How are we at the stage that people just ignore straight up obvious facts?
Thanks for taking the trouble to do that. As you say it isn't rocket science to get hold of the document itself but so few bother, including me, and the government relies on this to get a YES on the basis of warm & fuzzy feelings.
Why don't they wheel in a TV into Parliament and play that clip right in front of Albo where Megan Davis states the Uluru Statement is 18 pages long, someone surely has it in their archive. I'd love to see Albo back pedal on that one.
Why are you guys saying USFH is 26 pages long is a “contested point”? It’s not. It’s crystal clear what the framers of the Uluru Statement included. You’re weak if you give away the concept that it’s “disputed” or “contested”. No.
The AFP has claimed it has been difficult for them to lay charges for foreign interference in social media because of the law. Surely, this appears to be a different kettle of fish. This is not foreign interference but Australians at RMIT, and I would assume the government, interfering in the process of disseminating information pertinent to an upcoming referendum. The whole Fact Checking group at RMIT should be questioned, and if applicable charged under the law if said laws exist. I can see the Left in Australia seeing the FBI, the DOJ and the White House getting away with it in the US so why shouldn't they do it. There should be equal justice under the law. The question is can we trust the AFP to be impartial?
How to tell if you are being censored on YT. Post your comment. If the counter remains on zero minutes you are being censored because you have been targeted. Even on Rumble Australians are being censored. Scary isn't it !
why do social media companies even have the right to fact check when most facts are subjective?? ffs pass a bill to ban fact checking innocent by law posts
If you’re going to be virtuous, you lose all credibility if you start filtering information that doesn’t align with your point of view. This is a bloody disgrace, and the reason I’ll be voting ‘NO’
This tv program tests the endurance of patience in listening to redundancies, apparent in the school teacher position that fb assumes itself to be, in. It reinforces eavesdropping public conversation, then banning the wrongful comments, but allowing the smearing comments about the perpetrators; sending our medium back to school & perhaps the principle’s office.
The Uluru Statement is more than one page. This exposes Albo as an idiot! Nothing less. We are not idiots and will not tolerate our idiot politicians treating us as idiots.
I don't read facebook or twitter, if you vote it is assumed you are capable of comprehending the issues for yourself.I certainly don't need Sky for guidance.
Sky can't complain . They were fine with it during 2020 election and is fine with it during 2024 . Can't complain when the thing you support is used against you. Clear they support rules for thee but not for me
as if FB has been sensoring political news like fascists for the past 5+ plus and we're finally seeing some push back by Western Values and Human Rights about Free Speech and Freedom from censorship! it's a huge issue!
@@beckybroomfield9399 exactly it’s now obvious Facebook has been full of bull, censoring crap all over the place and that’s how we end up with idiots for PM
The fact that they went extraordinary length to censor the no campaign, screams that the right choice is to vote "no". 😊 I will be voting "no". Will you?
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
There needs to be consequences for the ABC, if they colluded with RMIT.
The ABC has become a publicly funded neo-Marxist propaganda machine.
No government should be censoring the public. The social media platforms shouldn't either.
and whom exactly is going to force social media to stop? How dumb is the rest of the World that you stupid mofos dont understand Freedom in the least... Govt and Corporations are totally different things. Corporations in a Laisse-Fair system of Govt are simply another INDIVIDUAL PERSON making a transaction that you both agree on. Socialists stare in blank silence as they try to digest what I just said... Of course their response will be pure stupidity because they all think Govt and Corporations should be partners against free people....
When social media companies act under the guidance of the state they are state agents.
VOTE-NO-TO "VOICE FOR PARLIAMENT"
And if you vote ‘Yes’ be prepared to pay huge retrospective reparation for living on what they claim was ‘Stolen Land’ 235 years ago.
No one should have the power to censor freedom of speech period
Fact check or do you mean censorship.
FB had no choice because federal would have to investigate them under foreign interference. Trust me FB did not do this out of the kindness of their heart.
Spot on. These are all crooks. Let's go Brandon 🤠
Who knew that FB did something right for a change
Because FB is so Pure and Holy, no doubt.
So we don't realise the influence of the next US election
FB are scum, there will be some even darker reason for them stopping this.
I suspect the fact checkers accreditation was no longer valid and given they received money from Facebook and given the clear cut bias and relationship to the ABC there may be ramifications around foreign interference in elections. Terrible look for ABC and RMIT.
It's quite a surprise... I'll be honest... if they keep that up for more than 5 minutes, I'll consider signing back up.
How can we be expected to vote on something that NO one can explain?
It’s an advisory body, as per the wording of the change
@@dumpstersanchez5205just like the health advice over the last few years that turned everything to shit. Govern me harder daddy
@@dumpstersanchez5205yet nobody can explain anything about this “ advisory body”. There are a number of legitimate questions about its make up, roles, responsibilities, powers and so forth that the people deserve to be given answers to BEFORE they vote on it. It’s the detail that needs to be explained first and it seems fir some reason the government is afraid to do that.
The Voice offers nothing that can’t be done right now by legislation so if it truely is about outcomes why is the government not using the power it has now? The most dangerous thing you can do is hand anybody more power when they fail to use the power they already have.
Places such as RMIT love diversity however not when it comes to political opinion
Or having diverse opinions.
Nicely done Sky News. You have a very intelligent, and just as important, a caring and trustworthy team. Thank you to you all. Best wishes Jason from Melbourne Victoria.
Excellent. RMIT should be ashamed of it self and has zero credibility.
In the name of being truthful, Facebook needs to change its name to Fakebook, starting immediately.😎
Really?? ... what about "fraudboobs" ? ... LOL
Hahaha. Fakebook 😮😂😮 Great. Let's go Brandon 🤠
Fraud boobs don't have the same ring as Fakebook to me though... Fraud Boobs, what are you six?🤣
What a good idea!
Write NO.
Biased fact checkers? Who would have thought. Wouldnt be the first.
vote NO.
So funny, Meta saying “it wasn’t us” when it was their own “fact checkers”.
Sharri you keep doing better and the biggest stories too. Thankyou
Both ABC and RMIT should be defunded. End of story.
So they are allowed to say what they want but if your comment doesn't suit their agenda it gets deleted right?
U tube does the same
@@rodneyh7151 Yep👍
That's also the gist of albosleazy's misinformation and disinformation bill.
"Censorship is contagious, and experience with this culture of regulation teaches us that regulatory enthusiasts herald each new medium of communications as another opportunity to spread the disease."
Robert Corn-Revere
Albow must go vote no
How corrupt
Vote NO.
write ‘NO’
In pen
Typical. Corruption incorporated*
Stunning and brave
I've read through the first 26 pages of the documents released under FOI. I've skimmed over and read parts of the remaining ~100 pages of notes.
It is very clear to me that:
* Page 1 is a summary of the following 25 pages.
* Pages 1-26 are the full statement.
* There are roughly 8 pages worth of footnotes and diagrams within those first 26 pages, which equates to the 18 pages stated by it's co-creators.
Anyone who claims to have read the document and still says it is 1 page is a liar. They're either lying about having read it, or lying about the contents.
Those claiming the other 25 page are meeting notes are lying or haven't read it. Those notes are on the 100 pages following the 25.
There shouldn't be any debate about this. It's bloody obvious the moment you read beyond page 1. How are we at the stage that people just ignore straight up obvious facts?
Thanks for taking the trouble to do that. As you say it isn't rocket science to get hold of the document itself but so few bother, including me, and the government relies on this to get a YES on the basis of warm & fuzzy feelings.
I'm surprised meta did something. Im waiting for the other shoe to drop...whats going on
I'm just gobsmacked shocked Meta would actually take action against biased censorship.
It's been more than 2 years since I deleted my fb account and it's been great. FB doesn't add any value to your life.
Why don't they wheel in a TV into Parliament and play that clip right in front of Albo where Megan Davis states the Uluru Statement is 18 pages long, someone surely has it in their archive. I'd love to see Albo back pedal on that one.
I suppose he'd say "Oh that's the accompanying documents, I was talking about the statement" like a typical slimy lawyer.
Why are you guys saying USFH is 26 pages long is a “contested point”? It’s not.
It’s crystal clear what the framers of the Uluru Statement included. You’re weak if you give away the concept that it’s “disputed” or “contested”. No.
Auntie Gucci (Linda Burney )... I'm voting NO... And NO to using Qantas ever again.. Send Qantas broke...
Very important decision, as it should be.
They should all be sacked over this what a complete joke
Let me guess ..some of the facts they had to check were true
Ha ha yep 😅
The AFP has claimed it has been difficult for them to lay charges for foreign interference in social media because of the law. Surely, this appears to be a different kettle of fish. This is not foreign interference but Australians at RMIT, and I would assume the government, interfering in the process of disseminating information pertinent to an upcoming referendum. The whole Fact Checking group at RMIT should be questioned, and if applicable charged under the law if said laws exist. I can see the Left in Australia seeing the FBI, the DOJ and the White House getting away with it in the US so why shouldn't they do it. There should be equal justice under the law. The question is can we trust the AFP to be impartial?
How to tell if you are being censored on YT. Post your comment. If the counter remains on zero minutes you are being censored because you have been targeted. Even on Rumble Australians are being censored. Scary isn't it !
why do social media companies even have the right to fact check when most facts are subjective?? ffs pass a bill to ban fact checking innocent by law posts
Fact check…
It’s woke speak for censorship.
I'm so jaded, I have trouble believing this isn't a PR stunt.
Real Marxist Institute of Thickology not surprised
There are plenty of people that can share some fact checks about RMIT.
The Fix is In!
Calling the voice a black tax is accurate just like climate net zero is a green tax
Oh great / Australian democracy being colluded by Sepo uni students
Good on you Mr musk
Same was happening during covid.
This is great to hear, good on you FB👍
We will remember them.
Better late than never...
If you’re going to be virtuous, you lose all credibility if you start filtering information that doesn’t align with your point of view. This is a bloody disgrace, and the reason I’ll be voting ‘NO’
PARTY TIME! ARREST THEM ALL. ROYAL COMMISSION TIME!!
RMIT FakeLab
Vote out Labor, Greens and their Teal cohorts this weekend.
About bloody time.
There is conspiracy out there 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 and that's from Albo the WEF Muppet 🤣🤣🤣🤣put John Howard back in the game and let's play 😉😉🍻🍻🍻♥️☮️🇦🇺
Albo calls it disinformation, the fact checkers take up Albo's call, Meta uses the fact checkers view the censor. This is how it works.
News you can't trust, opinions you can ignore. We are rapidly disappearing up our own rabbit holes.
This tv program tests the endurance of patience in listening to redundancies, apparent in the school teacher position that fb assumes itself to be, in. It reinforces eavesdropping public conversation, then banning the wrongful comments, but allowing the smearing comments about the perpetrators; sending our medium back to school & perhaps the principle’s office.
You mean truth denied
We are good we do the right thing…
Maybe Meta/Facebook shouldn’t have a ministry of truth (or truth police). That’s a big reason. I haven’t gone on my timeline in three or four years.
Tip of the iceberg.
Gotta love the back stepping movement 🎉
No!
The Voice isnt a TV show in Australia?
A F T about fuc(ing time !!!👏👏👏👏👏
The Uluru Statement is more than one page. This exposes Albo as an idiot! Nothing less. We are not idiots and will not tolerate our idiot politicians treating us as idiots.
Censorship through cov lies but the voice gets special treatment 🤷🤬
My university assignments went longer than a page, but we can change the constitution in a page? 🤔
Hang on… my electricity bill goes longer than a page too.
Who will babysit the babysitter's?
.... and what of all the other things they were censoring? Will they re-instate content and apologise?
Dam this is damming information.
Im not even on Facebook their a bunch of bull
Well done meta
They have to otherwise they will lose to X or elon suckt into the you tube should be on notice from Rumble baby
Fairness, from fact, checkers, what a laugh they’re all left, leaning Loneys
I don't read facebook or twitter, if you vote it is assumed you are capable of comprehending the issues for yourself.I certainly don't need Sky for guidance.
Sky can't complain . They were fine with it during 2020 election and is fine with it during 2024 . Can't complain when the thing you support is used against you. Clear they support rules for thee but not for me
Congratulations your first in line for a frontal lobotomy.
Seek help…..
About time
Who here remembers the statement to be 27 pages I serntenly do that's fact
Friends shouldn’t let friends Facebook ….mmmm perhaps a T shirt
"Factlab", what a great name for creating narratives.😂
Hahaha. 🤪🐈⬛🤪
Wow. I did work experience at RMIT Fact Checkers in 2020. Never got bad vibes from my supervisors. 😳
I would not say this is stunning victory for SKY. It is dead boring.
as if FB has been sensoring political news like fascists for the past 5+ plus and we're finally seeing some push back by Western Values and Human Rights about Free Speech and Freedom from censorship! it's a huge issue!
No abc stooge would.
Stick to chasing parked cars looser.
Sky news Australia it’s getting little bit boring and Fear mongering
So now the truth is coming it’s boring is it.. 🤡
Nobody under 70 uses Facebook
What's Facebook?
That’s bull.
@@beckybroomfield9399 exactly it’s now obvious Facebook has been full of bull, censoring crap all over the place and that’s how we end up with idiots for PM
I only use it to stalk libtards
market place has joined the chat
The fact that they went extraordinary length to censor the no campaign, screams that the right choice is to vote "no". 😊
I will be voting "no". Will you?
WRITE NO in black ink.
The independent fact checkers are actually independent smack tellers!!