Modeling Microphone Vs Me
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ค. 2024
- All of the gear I use: sweetwater.sjv.io/5g5jDj
UA Mics: sweetwater.sjv.io/NkPzKK
The Recording Studio mini-course:
andrewmasterscourses.com/p/th...
Book consultations/remote recording/sessions
Website: www.andrewmastersmusic.com
Instagram: / andrewmastersmusic
Tiktok: / andrewmastersmusic
I get all my music here:
fm.pxf.io/c/2571381/1347628/1...
Affiliate links from Sweetwater + Amazon
(support the channel by using them)
Studio desk / Racks:
Dangerfox 24u:sweetwater.sjv.io/3eRaky
Dangerfox Splitbay 16u: sweetwater.sjv.io/KjPGBv
Dangerfox Racks: sweetwater.sjv.io/DKqmWG
Drums and Equipment:
sweetwater.sjv.io/anK1Jq
Guitars, Amps and Pedals:
sweetwater.sjv.io/75ab9A
Studio Monitors:
sweetwater.sjv.io/jrRnDZ
Audio Interfaces:
sweetwater.sjv.io/R50OKv
Headphones:
sweetwater.sjv.io/5gjb6D
Microphones:
sweetwater.sjv.io/vND4Oy
Content Creator Gear:
sweetwater.sjv.io/GmDjA2
Mic Pres & Ouboard gear:
sweetwater.sjv.io/DKWbao
Keyboards and Controllers:
sweetwater.sjv.io/g1obzv
Studio Equipment and Accessories:
sweetwater.sjv.io/zNja1G
Side tables on wheels:
amzn.to/45qvvZy
Cameras:
Canon EOS R5: amzn.to/3dMxwt2
Canon EOS R: amzn.to/3wmjdSF
RF 15-35 2.8 Lens: amzn.to/3isBqaf
Lighting:
Cool Panels: amzn.to/45zAQOX
Main Light: amzn.to/45k0gQi
Soft box: amzn.to/41UNxAB
#recording #musicproduction #studiosetup #producer #audioengineer #recordingstudio #studiotour #andrewmasters #recordingcourse #universalaudio #modelingmicrophone #hemisphere #plugins - เพลง
What are you using modeling microphones on?
never used one before but does make it easier if you are on a budget.
mostly on snare and toms... sometimes on OH. I use Slate ML-2. Cheap and they sound AWESOME even without modelling. I use the often without modelling on ride and hihat and OH (to my ears they sound pretty close to KM84 on OH - without modelling).
People are upset but the reality is this technology will get better and better. And to be honest if you don’t have 50K for a mic locker you can get really great emulations that no one will be able to tell the difference.
All sounds the same on my iPhone anyway…
This is a great way to show what each of these microphones' base EQ curve is and how it responds to a source. imo the microphone choice is to make your workflow smoother so you have to do less work in post to get to your final product. I think a common misconception, for especially the untrained ear, is that a new microphone will automatically make your mix better and then you get underwhelmed by not getting the result off the bat. The whole reason for this plethora of gear/software choice is to streamline your tracking to release process. That's why I'm loving the direction of not only these large companies making it more accessible to learn about what each piece of gear sounds like, but also content creation/creators sharing what they've learned over the countless years of research and development. Thank you Andrew for this channel and sharing!
Damn good drum sound, my man. It made my monitors smile.
Very cool. Thank you for showing us this!
increíble contenido! Saludos desde México!... Ojalá pronto veamos otro Home Studio Tour
amazing video Andrew.
Interesting - at this price point especially. Product design well executed. Acoustic guitar isn't my thing (acoustic pianist here), so I'd much rather have had a piano recording to compare the differences with, but the drums spoke loud and clear for the mics and their models. I like that you added room ambiance as well. Thanks!
Just got the SC-1. Excited to try out the different models and see how they sound on acoustic guitar and vocals. I know it's not a perfect replication but I appreciate finally having an affordable option.
Some are minor differences I hear is in eq. Not hearing the mic diagram and resonance differences. Still a nice sounded mic by itself.
I think this mic will inspire and make the recording process fun for producers who are new. The replicating aspect, I don’t think needs to be accurate to the original because it is less common to use raw recordings in most cases.
Try out gear and if you like it, that’s all that matters
UA has answered my "prayers" for a more affordable modeling system! Cheers
I think this tech is really cool and UAD are obviously doing it really well. Do you have thoughts on option paralysis? I find having so many options can stifle my creativity and productivity vs being limited and using a few tools to get the sound I want. I’m on the fence of getting one of these or a 414.
Press the little red square on the top right to "pin" the plug in window and keep more than one open. Use Dynamic transport to just keep the loop selected. =-)
Great review , you sound great no matter what u use 😅 blessings
It's always bad at the same spot, where it's always discernible between any good mic and any budget mics: high mids and highs. No amount of modelling can take care of a spiffy mic, and all those I've used/tried make you work super hard to get enough presence out of a vocal without piercing through people's heads with esses and consonants.
Great video. Awesome products! One tiny suggestion: The first time you ran through the models, you talked right before switching each one, and it was distracting. The second time, you let the screen show us the changes and didn't talk, which was much better... Keep up the awesome work with your channel!
I mean for a $500 mic it doesn't sound bad just raw without Hemisphere. My question is with these is how do they go if you're running through outboard compression etc. on the way in. I like the idea of a modelling mic but if I'm recording a vocal through my usual chain going in, I don't want to apply the mic modelling afterwards. Would be cooler to me if there were some kind of DSP in the mic itself that stored whatever it was last set to in the plugin or something and output that. I suppose that'd mean also having AD and DA converters inside the mic which is pretty unreasonable but still that's always been the hold up for me with modelling mics. If you run straight into your DAW (or via Unison) and mix entirely in the box then it makes sense though.
Would using a different large-diaphragm condenser, more or less, achieve the same results? I understand UA has specifically calibrated Hemisphere based on the specs of their standard series mics, but… would it get close?
I own the SD-1 (and therefore can use hemisphere) but would love to keep using my WA-14 rather than picking up the SC-1 at the moment.
for some things it seems to change a lot and in other cases the differences are almost imperceptible
I like auditioning things like this with a compressor on top of it, cause that brings out even more exaggerated differences. And in a mix, things are going to be processed, so having that information early on is helpful.
This makes me wish I wouldn't have sold my SD-1. Oh well, I'll just go ahead and give into the temptation of repeatedly making "small $200ish purchases," until I've slowly bankrupted me and my family, thus forcing my future children into generational poverty. However, maybe then, my home studio tracks will finally sound polished and ready for Spotify.
Also, thanks for the video!
Have you seen Harrison has released a new analog 32 ch. mixing console?
Do you have to have any UA hardware or interface to make this work? I'm using a RME and Studio One - would this work?
Sure, works with any interface/DAW. You are missing out on low latency monitoring though.
hey man! what drums are you using??
Considering that the plugin must be placed on the Apollo console first I would lose Unisson.
This will obviously require significant processing power. How much does it require?
can i use it hemisphere system without uad interfaces? and with antelope system?
Yes. Or you could just get the Antelope modeling mic for cheaper.
No sir… I’ll pass🏃🏾♂️🏃🏾♂️
Am I wrong in thinking that this modeling stuff is basically fancy EQ presets?
An inexpensive mic with preset EQ curves to my ear....as usual.
Have you a verdict?
Interesting. There are certainly reasons to spend thousands on traditional hardware but it’s getting ever harder to justify for sonic reasons.
Big differences between models on SD-1. I couldn’t tell at all for SC-1.
Really? I thought the differences were quite dramatic. Not as dramatic as with the SD-1 though. But it's pretty much the differences you would expect. What are you listening on?
@@henrikpetersson3463 AirPod Pro2. I can hear the difference between the baseline mic and when he activated the modeler, but once he was scrolling through, it was little to no difference between mics.
@@bbellomusic AirPods aren't pro listening devices (I have and use them, but never for audio discernment: only for a little music background, or google maps while I'm riding my motorcycle).
@@balisaani no sh*t. But I listen to a lot of gear demo videos with them and I can usually hear a meaningful difference when channels like Andertons A/B things. Those actual mics sound pretty different, so I expect to hear a difference in the modeling plug in.
We’re all looking for a $500 mic that sounds like a $10,000 vintage U87. 🧐
Wow, a modeling mic thats affordable?? might aswell...
This is cool! Nice effort by UA but I think I'll pass.
Btw, you get a bit of weird resonance going on with your voice-over mic set-up. I don't exactly know what's going on but you can clearly discern it around 5:30 onward. Cheers!
What do you think is better…. Slate oder this ?
Antares once was the King of microphone modelling. It never sticked.
Are you serious?
This nothing more than little eq presets 🤷🏻♂️
It was a bit underwhelming
Ua is underwhelming in general. I’ve been selling all my ua gear tbh
@@Tommyalpaca "underwhelming in general" is not very specific, is it.
@@TommyalpacaUA is goated but pricy
really becoming inconsistant with the vids man
It's not April 1st is it??? This is a joke.
Bring back the studio tours - the endless product plugs aren’t why we watch you.
You clicked this video
@@AndrewMasters took the words right out of my mouth.
This is useless without A/B tests with the real mics IMO
Meh...