AT-1K Raybolt (Hyeongung) Anti-Tank Guided Missile Test Footage

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
  • Republic of Korea Army has green lit the mass production & fielding of Raybolt (Hyeongung; 현궁) medium-range fire & forget anti-tank guided missile. Raybolt is a domestically-develope weapon system that is equipped with an IR seeker, tandem warhead, and direct & top attack modes. It has a range of 3 km (1.8 mi)
    Raybolt was developed to modernize South Korea's aging anti-tank arsenal, which includes 90mm & 106mm recoilless rifles, TOW, and METIS-M anti-tank missiles.
    Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) claims Raybolt is smaller, lighter, and cheaper than similar foreign weapon systems all the while being more effective.
    국군의 신형 현궁 대전차미사일.
    Original Videos: • [콕뉴스] 중거리 대전차유도무기 현궁 품... & • [방위사업청] 보병용중거리유도무기(현궁)...
    #raybolt #atgm #현궁

ความคิดเห็น • 338

  • @luischoe1768
    @luischoe1768 6 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    Incredible weapon.

  • @TurkishHedgehog
    @TurkishHedgehog 6 ปีที่แล้ว +140

    Greetings from Turkey. Go South Korea.

    • @incelkeys6630
      @incelkeys6630 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @pavel-makarov777
      @pavel-makarov777 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Salam Turkish brother, do you know if a person from outside Turkey can work in Aselsan company?

    • @pavel-makarov777
      @pavel-makarov777 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your electronic innovations in military equipment are impressive

    • @gqbe612
      @gqbe612 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      터키가 브라더는 무슨ㅋㅋ 그놈의 2002년 형제드립이 아직도..

    • @pressXpickthezoe
      @pressXpickthezoe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      gq be 한국 깔보는거 보다는 좋죠 뭐

  • @dLimboStick
    @dLimboStick 6 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    South Korea: Knock knock
    Kim Jong Un: Who's there?
    South Korea: Hyeongung!

    • @minajavemasa3965
      @minajavemasa3965 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      lol

    • @MNANDARO
      @MNANDARO 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A poor knock knock joke. Point taken though lol

  • @williamhong623
    @williamhong623 6 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    wow, what a badass anti-tank missle

  • @Superpanda1022
    @Superpanda1022 6 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    see through smoke, incredible

    • @theflyinggasmask
      @theflyinggasmask 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      it's called flir... nothing new.

    • @userfromdz
      @userfromdz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      LWIR Long Wave Infrared

    • @debsattam1
      @debsattam1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That was the incredible easy part what was incredible was the missile mechanism.

  • @king_kiff3969
    @king_kiff3969 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    good job! very top tier system.

  • @raymundoshim5760
    @raymundoshim5760 6 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    48할배... ㅠㅠ 죽는순간까지 부려먹히는 구나... ㅠㅠ

    • @user-hx2vt5mr6j
      @user-hx2vt5mr6j 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Raymundo Shim 기동표적으로 한번 죽고, 보강해서 정지표적으로 또죽고... 또죽고.... 고인능욕수준이죠

    • @mira9693
      @mira9693 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Raymundo Shim ㅠㅠ

    • @caelum01
      @caelum01 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      M??:해방이다!

    • @descriptiondescriptiondescript
      @descriptiondescriptiondescript 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      아 왜 울게 만들어 ㅠㅠ

    • @user-djvud
      @user-djvud 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      할베 수리병출신인데...m계열전차 수리 주특기 아직도 있나요?

  • @phairecouchpotato3912
    @phairecouchpotato3912 6 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    south Koreans are cool. love from the west.

    • @jiwong5807
      @jiwong5807 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Chu Isaac Actually, Japan is top 2 gayest country in the word, and Uk is top 5 and US is top 13

    • @user-zz7cg1os4e
      @user-zz7cg1os4e 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jiwong5807 ㅋㅋ ㅈㄹ하네

  • @xaviervitug
    @xaviervitug 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love south Korea. Watching this on my Samsung 🇰🇷🇰🇷

  • @diligentone-six2688
    @diligentone-six2688 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    You better watch out, you better cry, you better watch out They're telling you why, South Korea is Coming to Town.

  • @user-yf5gm9gs7m
    @user-yf5gm9gs7m 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    91년 90무반동사수 였는대.
    요즘은 좋은거 쓰네
    저거 무개가 얼마나 될려나😒
    90 어깨매고 헐떡고개 넘던 기억이 나는군.😱

    • @GaegolMaster
      @GaegolMaster 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      님아.. 실전에서 적 벙커나 토치카 만나면 다들 님만 쳐다보고 있을 것임요.

  • @su297777
    @su297777 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    M48퇴역하면 신형전차보단 대전차미사일 더 보급하는게 좋을것 같음.

  • @georgebronson1730
    @georgebronson1730 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Imagine a dual Raybolt install in your Hyundai or Kia sedan or SUV

  • @hueirasparta9002
    @hueirasparta9002 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Javelin + Samsung's semi-conductor technology.

  • @samg9888
    @samg9888 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    3 km range has got to be a joke. Javelin is hitting 4.7km and the HJ-12 is hitting 4.3 km.

    • @channeltimes3548
      @channeltimes3548 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Ray bolt : Total 13 Kg.
      Javelin: Total 25 Kg.
      O.k??

    • @windowsxp7460
      @windowsxp7460 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@channeltimes3548 no, raybolt is 20kg.

    • @michaellim4165
      @michaellim4165 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But Raybolt costs half the cost of a Javelin. So with two Raybolt you can take out two tanks vs only one tank on a javelin.

  • @user-ss5di1nv6s
    @user-ss5di1nv6s 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man that rocket shell is BIG

  • @helioscephelles
    @helioscephelles 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    noice! reminds me of the Javeline.. NK better watch out.

    • @FaithBiete
      @FaithBiete 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ATGM Can't stop Nuclear Bomb hehe

  • @sanjaydeewan4761
    @sanjaydeewan4761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love you 😘❤️ south Korea you make one of the best wepons keep it up very good

  • @parusol235
    @parusol235 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Is the copper pan that’s supposed to penetrate the tank replaced with the latest KPOP album?

    • @jf869
      @jf869 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ChittinBricks pure fire soundtrack as the penetrating element

    • @michaellim4165
      @michaellim4165 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look up BTS fire

  • @0902killer
    @0902killer 6 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Pretty badass

  • @attitudekilleroriginal
    @attitudekilleroriginal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So many anti tank missile videos from different countries, yet not a single one showed the condition of a tank after attack. Damage they do can't be judged by size of explosion.

    • @wildfire7268
      @wildfire7268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      The guided missile in that video is a training warhead. The power of combat warheads is military secrets.

    • @Anthraxxx1985
      @Anthraxxx1985 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      really ? you can see the effect of tank hit in youtube bro.. see the libyan war, iraq war tank taking down by agtm, the operator fry inside

    • @michaellim4165
      @michaellim4165 ปีที่แล้ว

      The tank is useless with dead operators.

  • @hotadts
    @hotadts 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome!

  • @the5139
    @the5139 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those wings...badass

  • @bruhthataintmine4389
    @bruhthataintmine4389 6 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    듣기론 저탄이 훈련탄이여서 성능은 약하다들었어요. 성능 자체가 군사기밀이여서다안보여줬단애기가있는데 우리나라도 구사쪽으로는 이제 많이따라가는거같아서 보기가좋습니다

    • @bruhthataintmine4389
      @bruhthataintmine4389 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      걸레까진몰라도 김정은 얼굴빻은정도까진 빻아지겠죠?

    • @RoidZ1911
      @RoidZ1911 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      대기갑용탄들이 고폭탄이 아니라 관통탄들이라 비쥬얼뽕 맞기는 어려울꺼예요. 관통후에 내부적으로 폭발하는 형태가 많아서.

    • @user-ww2wx1oe1l
      @user-ww2wx1oe1l 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      팬저라기 보다는 재블린이나 스파이크쪽에 가까울겁니다.

    • @user-uj8ey5dy1v
      @user-uj8ey5dy1v 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      저게 실제 탄두입니다. 성형작약으로 메탈제트로 손가락 만한 구멍을 뚫고 들어가 안의 사람과 장비를 고온고압으로 파괴하는겁니다.

    • @user-uj8ey5dy1v
      @user-uj8ey5dy1v 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      그건 연출입니다. 표적안에 폭발물 가득넣고 폭발시키는..
      실제로는 가능합니다. 안에 포탄등이 유폭될 경우에는요.

  • @terranhkh
    @terranhkh 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    패튼은 차체한정 탑어택이긴 한데.. 저 장갑차는 측면공격이 되버렸..

  • @user-nb6sy9hn5t
    @user-nb6sy9hn5t 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    오늘도 고통받는 m48 patton전차..

  • @i_nameless_i-jgsdf
    @i_nameless_i-jgsdf ปีที่แล้ว

    They are shooting at a perfectly fine M48A1 D:

  • @user-iw2oe9dt2b
    @user-iw2oe9dt2b 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good

  • @6565hopepy
    @6565hopepy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice, not bad

  • @user-by5ml9wf3w
    @user-by5ml9wf3w 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    저거 적군 탱크나 차량에겐 쥐약이다. 마주치면 out

  • @bummer910
    @bummer910 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    having that kind of incoming angle it can be very easely intercepted by Israeli Trophy system and Russian Arena and Afganit systems

    • @corey8420
      @corey8420 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Think they are just concerned with taking out vehicles from the north.

  • @phaknam
    @phaknam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why doesn't the M-48 turret bounce off like a Tow missile fires a Russian T-72 ?

  • @neurofiedyamato8763
    @neurofiedyamato8763 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is pretty awesome. BTW what's the music used?

  • @gokhanaydin2006
    @gokhanaydin2006 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    nice

  • @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN
    @UMAKEMESMILESWACKIN 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Bravo

  • @corporalkang-in-chan7926
    @corporalkang-in-chan7926 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ROK Super nice

  • @JMK-nf3ee
    @JMK-nf3ee 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    제발 장갑하고 팔꿈치 보호대좀 지급해라.. 실전에서 아파서 싸우기나 하겠냐

    • @DonaldJohnTrumpV2
      @DonaldJohnTrumpV2 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      돈없어

    • @killarza5070
      @killarza5070 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Tideoflung 생계형비리라는 자칭보수 ㅋ ㅋㅋㅋ

  • @ScharfeZungel
    @ScharfeZungel 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rooftop koreans when they have extra firepower

  • @wreckemtech165
    @wreckemtech165 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Where can I buy one? For educational demonstrations 🤔

  • @maxsoon1097
    @maxsoon1097 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Similar like Javelin. Only this one is South Korean version. Still good like the US.

  • @GamingDisorder420
    @GamingDisorder420 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Made by Samsung?

    • @user-ui8bc8bi8h
      @user-ui8bc8bi8h 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Joshua Ngau Ajang we arw using note 7 shell

    • @ddadngddd
      @ddadngddd 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Made by Samsung. Many korea weapon is made by samsung, hyundai, lg.

    • @user-vw9ev9lh4s
      @user-vw9ev9lh4s 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      no!!! Made by LIG Nex1
      th-cam.com/video/xVULIl0WUOA/w-d-xo.html

    • @featherstones6766
      @featherstones6766 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah I agree with ya XD. The war head must be the Galaxy Note 7

  • @brianjordan2192
    @brianjordan2192 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    It looks a lot like a javelin, except all the writing on the launcher views was in some strange oriental writing.
    (Yes, I know. It was sarcasm. Supposed to be funny)

    • @brianjordan2192
      @brianjordan2192 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      food
      Your wife us oriental.
      Come find me. You'll get a quick and very short dose of reality, then your oriental wife will be an oriental widow.
      It's called the orient dumbass. People from there are orientals dumbass. It's not an insult dumbass.
      It's not a racial slur dumbass.
      The orient is in the east dumbass. The occident is in the west dumbass. People in Europe and the Americas are occidentals dumbass.
      You're so ignorant it gives me a headache dunlmbass.

    • @fockwulf1
      @fockwulf1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      food get wrecked you ignorant peice of shit

    • @jefferyfeng1778
      @jefferyfeng1778 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      it is Javelin though

    • @reynardpark9362
      @reynardpark9362 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks to stupid racist, I could achieve a lot of things while you were pooping around like an ape. XD Please, be stay still like a loser. You are a such a big loser. XXX

    • @Ssgt2012
      @Ssgt2012 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Reynard Park but it's true tho?.. oriental doesn't mean anything bad. Calm down lol just calling out some Asian stuff Asian isn't a bad thing?..

  • @timtim-hf3ut
    @timtim-hf3ut 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's so cool

  • @SPK4720
    @SPK4720 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    사우디인가? 중동에서 실전으로 쓰이고 있다는게 이건가??
    실제로 전차인가??파괴 영상 있던데..

    • @ljh3825
      @ljh3825 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      오토바이 자동차 때려잡음

    • @Ssgt2012
      @Ssgt2012 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      LJH 오토바이랑 자동차를 잡는데 몇천몇억짜리 미사일을 쏜다고?!? 중동이라 돈이 많아서 그럴수도;;

    • @heekim5188
      @heekim5188 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Ssgt2012 오토바이가 문제가아니라.. 그걸 타고있는 적군의 가치가 중요한거지.. 그 옛날 기관총의 총알 소비가 많아서.. 돈많이 들어간다고.. 그냥 딱총이나 쓰자고 했다가.. 쓸려나간.. 모국 왕의 어리석음을 못들어 보셨는가?

  • @ipanzerschrecku4732
    @ipanzerschrecku4732 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Nice...for the weapon to be truly effective against a large number of tanks you need to have a carrier with a large number of rockets and the ability to target the tanks from a drone or UAV so to get at targets BWR... but well done Korea.

    • @thebravegallade731
      @thebravegallade731 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      To be fair it's something that we want to give to EVERYTHING that can carry it.

  • @mohitjangid2048
    @mohitjangid2048 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @raditya5663
    @raditya5663 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish it ia cheap so TNI AD can buy it and pindad can get licenses to produce it

  • @phaknam
    @phaknam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this missile anti tank prototype based on the spike and javelin ?

    • @user-gz6ju8uy3v
      @user-gz6ju8uy3v 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Weapon system developed based on spikes

  • @djhuseyn5401
    @djhuseyn5401 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i wish one day all weapons all over the world will be flowers :)

  • @generaltan
    @generaltan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why does it explode before hitting the target?

    • @user-ez2jp1vb1t
      @user-ez2jp1vb1t 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      GeneralTan Current atgms have two warhead, one in forward is for penetraion and second one is for destruction. Penetration warhead should explode immediately before impact, or as soon as shell touches the target. It would look like it exploded before collision

    • @nogibertv4824
      @nogibertv4824 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not really...the Tandem Warhead design is used to defeat armor with Explosive Reactive Tiles which is effective in stopping conventional HEAT warheads..its mode of action is the first warheads detonates the ERA tiles before penetrating the main armor..

    • @timothyfoy7993
      @timothyfoy7993 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It only looks that way,the Explosion is what you see as the Weapon punches threw the Hull of the Tank its aimed at!! What you are seeing is the Flames of the Weapon's Inpact,your Eyes just cant see the Mill-Seconds just before the Explosion or the Actual Damage Caused by the Missle just after the Explosion!!! The Flames from the Warhead Obscure your Line of Sight or NLOS Non Line of Sight just Depends on the Angle and the Distance from which you view the Launch and Downrange Explosion??? Cheers

  • @MrDonboston
    @MrDonboston 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Isnt this just a renamed Javelin made by the US only with significantly less firepower , it hardly makes a dent in that ancient tank

    • @m-h5615
      @m-h5615 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Comment says that the missile in video is traning dummy without warhead.

    • @adamweiser2515
      @adamweiser2515 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes

    • @SuperGeronimo999
      @SuperGeronimo999 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) claims Raybolt is smaller, lighter, and cheaper than similar foreign weapon systems all the while being more effective.

    • @SuperGeronimo999
      @SuperGeronimo999 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And Javelin hardly "makes a dent" either, just watch at 3:04 and 8:53
      th-cam.com/video/PSp3G3D61mo/w-d-xo.html

    • @LordSauron219
      @LordSauron219 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Lol they are not made to make a dent it's their job to penetrate and kill the crews. Although it didn't do much I'm pretty sure the insides would be a bloody mess

  • @franciscojosedariasfernand6254
    @franciscojosedariasfernand6254 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Genial :)

  • @HAUNEV
    @HAUNEV 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The bgm?

  • @user-vz5wx8gd7y
    @user-vz5wx8gd7y 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    이야 좌식으로 저따만한 미사일을 쏘는데 안정감보소

  • @user-iy2ei4lq7f
    @user-iy2ei4lq7f 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    우리나라도 재블린 만듬 ㅋㅋㅋ

  • @corporalkang-in-chan7926
    @corporalkang-in-chan7926 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This South Korean anti tank rocket is based on the Spike or javalin or kornet ??

    • @user-gz6ju8uy3v
      @user-gz6ju8uy3v 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Weapon system developed based on spikes

  • @user-pc1pl6ri6s
    @user-pc1pl6ri6s 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool

  • @gemnicherry2670
    @gemnicherry2670 ปีที่แล้ว

    That thing is mean sounding

  • @user-lc9zh4cy4j
    @user-lc9zh4cy4j 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    자대 갔더니 M48A3K
    3개월후 K1으로 교체
    100대 가량 되었는데
    다 어데로 갔는교?
    주임원사님 왈
    난 하사시절 셔먼탔다.
    과거 셔먼은 죄다 이스라엘로
    비공식 넘어갔다고 하더만

  • @Shekel_Master
    @Shekel_Master 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ouch, poor m60 getting bullied by ATGM

  • @amnagul2448
    @amnagul2448 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    SUBSCRiBED from Pakistan I love south Korean weapon

    • @islandtree7577
      @islandtree7577 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure.. it takes advantages from both , and improved...

  • @nanyabiznus4738
    @nanyabiznus4738 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why does it look like North Korea footage?

  • @raptor6038
    @raptor6038 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does it work in smoke?

  • @corbanx0809
    @corbanx0809 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    no material (pictures/video) of the damage after the impact? also what about the inside of the targets? put some watermelons inside the targets and let us see what happens to them. just curious

  • @ganunesealghulami2942
    @ganunesealghulami2942 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Truly javelin

    • @khairulazhar8118
      @khairulazhar8118 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ganunese Alghulami. Agreed, same design..

    • @saladtea9708
      @saladtea9708 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      looks like javelin, used like javelin, sounds like javelin, it is javelin

    • @So1othurn
      @So1othurn 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Must be just be a low yield for target practice because > /watch?v=x6_JpPvWCAQ

    • @ganunesealghulami2942
      @ganunesealghulami2942 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Khairul Azhar berat 66..jupe ore kg ambo.hihihi

    • @ganunesealghulami2942
      @ganunesealghulami2942 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wei Song javelin in Malay stand for tombak...how about u?

  • @user-jw7wx3qi4v
    @user-jw7wx3qi4v 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    탑어택 탠덤탄두라 어지간한 전차는 다 뚫림

  • @trollmay873
    @trollmay873 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Coreaaanos locos!

  • @Puzzoozoo
    @Puzzoozoo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tell me again, that with a stronger economy, and all this better kit South Korea needs the US military to occupy South Korea?

    • @danteji156
      @danteji156 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not only for s.korea's sake. In sense of US international military dominance, US military placed in s.korea is still needed. US can establish zero-distance military assets like compounds, surveillance system, MD system through Far east asia alliance. I guess you are aged and wise enough to know 'Guantanamo bay'. Military assets positioned in other cuntey's territory are priceless. As for this, s.korea is just right under the china's neck. Your government is not a fool. So many politicians in US keep arguing on this issue. Because it gives them political advantage. They do 'politics', not 'manage' or 'operate'. Most of people tend to see a tree because politicians want them to do so for their vote. As your government has been being, Move your view to the whole mountain, not on just a tree. Sorry for my english.

  • @Mr.Sonkar
    @Mr.Sonkar 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    That vehicle mounted one was so badasss damn bruhhhhhhh @__@

  • @user-pb8uh1yx2t
    @user-pb8uh1yx2t 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    성능 좋네여^^

    • @user-tf7su5ki5b
      @user-tf7su5ki5b 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      2년뒤 바로 논에 떨어져 버렀!

  • @fleedinglife
    @fleedinglife 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    저렇게 큰 미사일이 발사하는데 어떻게 반동이 없을 수 있지? 신기하다. 다른 나라에서 대전차 미사일 쏘는 것을 봤는데 그건 빨간 레이저로 표적을 정하자 미사일이 뺑글 뺑글 도는 궤적을 그리며 결국 목표물을 맞추던데...현궁은 그런 기능이 없는가?

    • @islandtree7577
      @islandtree7577 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      그건 구식임.. 사람이 끝까지 유도해야 하므로, 미사일 날아오는 동안 조준하는 사람 쪽으로 마구 포 쏴대면 조준자가 불안해서 조준 실패하는 경우가 많음.. 반명 현궁은 조준, 발사후 바로 도망가도 현궁이 스스로 알아서 명중..

    • @islandtree7577
      @islandtree7577 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      그리고 뒤가 뚫려 있으 므로 반동 없음.. 2차 대전 때 무반동포부터 rpg 7 등등... 뒤가 완전히 막혀 있으면 대포임..

    • @user-ln2nz1yp5v
      @user-ln2nz1yp5v 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      발사시는 압축가스로 나가고 나간뒤에 공중에서 마사일이 발사되는방식

  • @rinbine2713
    @rinbine2713 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    아래 댓글에 25Km가 힘들거라하는데, 왜 안되냐? 할 수있다.
    그리고, 차량에 장착한거는 좀더 커져도 되니, 25km는 껌이지.

    • @rinbine2713
      @rinbine2713 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@clickclick7245
      현대전 개념에 누가 보고 쏩니까? 되도록 최대한 안 보이는 상황에서 쏘고 그 자리를 벗어나는게 현대전이죠. 항공전을 보면 알 수 있듯이.
      드론 연동하면 충분히 락온 가능하구요. 요즘 대대급부터 시작해서 군단급 까지 드론 운용 중 이죠? 그걸 그냥 감시용으로만 쓸게 아니라 무기랑 연계하는게 추세잖아요?
      그러면 25Km는 충분히 되죠. 25Km가 굉장히 먼것 처럼 이야기 하시는데, 현대 자주포 사거리(30~50Km) 이내 입니다. 어떻게든 선제 타격해서 아군 피해를 최소화 해야죠.
      그리고 전쟁에 비용 문제는 언급 안 하는게 맞아요. 미국은 미쳤다고 천문학적 비용들여가며, 무기 개발하고 운용합니까?
      추가로 K2 전차 한대가 비쌀까요? 24Km짜리 미사일 한 발이 비쌀까요? 적 자주포에 K2 전차나 아군이 타격을 받을경우 피해 비용도 계산해야지요. 적 탱크 가격만 생각할게 아니라.

    • @rinbine2713
      @rinbine2713 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@clickclick7245 그건 보병이 휴대용이구요. 제가 전제를 달았잖아요. 차량에 부착하는 형태로 개발하자고,
      어떻게든 먼거리에서 발견하고 선제타격하는게 현대전의 핵심인데. 왜 그걸 거부하시는지?
      미국이 그런다고 다 따라해야됩니까?

    • @rinbine2713
      @rinbine2713 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@clickclick7245 계속 가격이야기 하시는데, 답글 이미 남겼습니다. 전쟁은 비용이 아니라 아군 피해를 최소화 해야한다고.
      그럴려면, 되도록 가시권 밖에서, 타격하는게 효과적이죠. 3Km면 탱크 사정 거리 이내이니, 거기까지 접근해야합니다.
      벙커 이야기 하시는데, 전시 상황이 벙커에 짱밖혀 있는 상황만 있습니까?
      적이 진군이나 이동할 경우 적의 지휘부 타격용으로 충분히 쓸만하고 가치가 있죠. Raybolt 차량용을 사거리 연장하여 운용하면, 대대나 사단의 화력도 엄청 증가되구요.
      대대나 사단의 작전 반경을 고려해볼 때 충분히 고려해볼 만한 가치가 있다고 판단됩니다.

    • @gyeongjujeon3339
      @gyeongjujeon3339 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      보병대전차무기 현궁에 대형 장거리 정밀 타격 미사일 스펙을 바라시네.. 미군에 그 유명한 헬파이어도 7킬로 남짓인데

    • @gyeongjujeon3339
      @gyeongjujeon3339 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      애초에 대전차미사일은 기동표적을 맞춰야하는데 사거리가 길면 그만큼 맞추기도 힘들어지니 사거리 제한 시키는겁니다 명중률도 떨어지고 비효율적이니

  • @grizzly9960
    @grizzly9960 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this not american technology sold to South Korea?

  • @samahmadoke8704
    @samahmadoke8704 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tanpa asap 👍

  • @user-uo1kf1hh5o
    @user-uo1kf1hh5o 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    M48 고인능욕 실화?

  • @chadcong7252
    @chadcong7252 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Javerlin??

  • @user-uo4fw8oc7h
    @user-uo4fw8oc7h 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    헬기에 달면 대박이겠네..

  • @mohamedzulkifly8966
    @mohamedzulkifly8966 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like Javelin to me..

  • @muhdnasruddinbinmuhdzahidi2862
    @muhdnasruddinbinmuhdzahidi2862 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    a south korean version of the fgm 148 javelin?

  • @chupacabra5644
    @chupacabra5644 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Poor patton

  • @flyhigun
    @flyhigun 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    M48 R.I.P

  • @paul123ggggggggg
    @paul123ggggggggg 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    the music = hiv

  • @rlaaudtjq
    @rlaaudtjq 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    보병부대 분대화기로 저걸 운용하면 적 탱크 있으나 마나?

    • @yeonjoseph
      @yeonjoseph 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      육군에서는 대대급 대전차화기로 운용됩니다.

  • @user-su1wf3gz3p
    @user-su1wf3gz3p 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    탄체의 돌입각이 좋질못하다 개선점이 될듯

    • @Cutlas_OwO
      @Cutlas_OwO 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      탑어택모드랑 직사모드 있어요.

    • @descriptiondescriptiondescript
      @descriptiondescriptiondescript 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      저게 탑모드입니다. 원본영상보면 상부라고 쓰여있어요. 탑모드가 자꾸 옆을 때리니 말이 나오는겁니다.

  • @applejuice5663
    @applejuice5663 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    북한탱크는 그냥 우리 전차가 밀고가서 밟아도 될정도임?

  • @Trayagain97
    @Trayagain97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Javelin versi korea

  • @Adolf.Kittler_
    @Adolf.Kittler_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That javelin anti tank missile

  • @Burbsi
    @Burbsi 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    pletty clazy stuff

  • @TwisterKidMedia
    @TwisterKidMedia 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    so its a javelin?

    • @yeonjoseph
      @yeonjoseph 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      basically improved(and cheaper) Javelin

  • @boojang8501
    @boojang8501 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    우리나라도 제블린이 잇엇구나

    • @Hadeshands
      @Hadeshands 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      이스라엘 스파이크 기반을 두고 만든겁니다. 제블린과 조상이 다름

  • @escaproject
    @escaproject 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    진짜 탄두 없는 실험탄 인가?? K200 옆구리도 관통이 안됐는데?? 정확도 위주로 테스트를 한거 같군요.

    • @escaproject
      @escaproject 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      저게 육안 관측입니까? 카메라 촬영인데??? 어디가 육안????

    • @pressXpickthezoe
      @pressXpickthezoe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      뒷북이지만 모의 탄두로 실험한거라네요!

  • @yanseok1988
    @yanseok1988 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    RIP M48

  • @beatbuzz2
    @beatbuzz2 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    중국이나 러시아 동영상보면 ...저런거 쏘면 지들 앞에 똑 떨어지고 놀래서 개발광하던데 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

  • @colin.k6263
    @colin.k6263 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo, it's me Japan
    You still hate me?

  • @micinhaha4634
    @micinhaha4634 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's why we make APS and shit ...

  • @user-qi5ul7qz2d
    @user-qi5ul7qz2d 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    بكم يلد

  • @junok1321
    @junok1321 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    사거리 20키로 이상은 불필요 할듯 2키로 정도면 충분함

    • @user-jo6um5il9f
      @user-jo6um5il9f 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      보병용이면 2km로 충분하죠 ㄹㅇ. 20km급이면 도수운반 불가능

  • @user-fp4qy1gv5b
    @user-fp4qy1gv5b 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    실전에 사용후 결과을

    • @DiNo_325
      @DiNo_325 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Young- Soo Yi 사우디에서 입증 됬습니다

    • @user-yi4tm6oj3j
      @user-yi4tm6oj3j 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      삐삣, 중동발 실전영상이 이미 있습니다.
      실제로 산뒤로 들어간 표적을 정확히 추적해서 파괴하는 영상이 있어오

  • @kareemjamoos9499
    @kareemjamoos9499 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    missile missile its a copy of israeli spike anti tank guided

    • @jesusf.2600
      @jesusf.2600 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      kareem jamoos BULLSHIT. IT US A COPY OF OUR AMERICAN JAVELINE MISSILE

    • @koreadefenseblog
      @koreadefenseblog  6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      South Korea is a user of SPIKE-NLOS missiles. Part of the procurement process was technology transfer from israel.

    • @Pg-xe7kk
      @Pg-xe7kk 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      We never used JAVELINE so that's impossible we used technologie gained from METIS-M (Russia) and SPIKE-NLOS (Israel)

    • @johnedwards3151
      @johnedwards3151 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      kareem jamoos,
      The Israeli spike is a rip off of the Javelin.

    • @user-gw1os1rr2f
      @user-gw1os1rr2f 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      what ever. us or israel helped our missile and? we helfed them by covid19 kit

  • @VEX_INC
    @VEX_INC 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Poor M48! T_T