50 MOST IMPORTANT LEGAL TERMS & MAXIMS ( PART 1 of 3) II BALA SIR

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 153

  • @samimaktar9415
    @samimaktar9415 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Really sir, this is very helpful video for understanding the legal terms in easy way, I have been looking like this video but I couldn't find out. But now I have got such this video which I was looking for. I understand everything on your videos sir, your video is really helpful.. thanks a lot..... I want like this video more..👍👍👍👍

  • @parushisharma6310
    @parushisharma6310 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    1.false as basic structure of constitution can not be amend
    2. State
    3.yes because they are considered to be of innocent mind

  • @ggbai4793
    @ggbai4793 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please do make continue video about LEGAL TERM learning, here I learned a lot. Eagerly Waiting for your next legal term Video ..👍👍

  • @swavnasahoo711
    @swavnasahoo711 5 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Sounds like Raftaar 🔥

  • @shaungorham1568
    @shaungorham1568 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool, Mississppi.

  • @LawyerinprogressSM
    @LawyerinprogressSM 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    True 1st no

  • @youtubeofficeentertain...356
    @youtubeofficeentertain...356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No2: government ,no 3,yes..

  • @soumyajyoti9054
    @soumyajyoti9054 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Ans 1. False, because Parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution.
    Ans 2. State becomes the owner of the ownerless goods.
    Ans 3. No

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

    • @soumyajyoti9054
      @soumyajyoti9054 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@FoolsDenjunior Okay. Thank you 😊

    • @vupenta4500
      @vupenta4500 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FoolsDenjunior
      Ans-2 : Quasi contract

  • @saurabhshukla7406
    @saurabhshukla7406 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes

  • @suktarasorb1835
    @suktarasorb1835 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    " Ultra vires " now easily can remember after relates with variant of "Corona vires" like ultra, bita,gamma 😂

  • @ShankarKumar-pr2dw
    @ShankarKumar-pr2dw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ans.2 no, ownership is claimef over those goods. in such case the custodian goes to the gov

  • @Study_With_Me_official.
    @Study_With_Me_official. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. True

  • @samradhmathur
    @samradhmathur 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Bala sir, good 🤘

  • @to-poke1
    @to-poke1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1st true

  • @officialharshit825
    @officialharshit825 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ans 1. True
    Ans 2. The person whoever find it
    Ans 3. Yes , this law apply the person of unsound mind .

    • @mathurtanishka9960
      @mathurtanishka9960 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      1. false as parliament cannot amend the basic structure of constitution

    • @footforwardeducation5803
      @footforwardeducation5803 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, parliament has no power to change the basic structure of the Constitution.....as said in KESHVANANDA BHARTI vs. UNION OF INDIA case

  • @Ram950
    @Ram950 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good and useful

  • @Proudhindusanatani108
    @Proudhindusanatani108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bala bala... Nice bala Sir

  • @tanvisrivastava9465
    @tanvisrivastava9465 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir this video's is applicable for 3yr llb program..

  • @Viewers_point
    @Viewers_point 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    2nd or 3rd part kaha he video ka ??

  • @asgharniaz9808
    @asgharniaz9808 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Q1 - True
    Q2 - Government
    Q3- Yes

  • @mdnehalahmad2910
    @mdnehalahmad2910 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's very helpful,👍Make some more videos in this topic please.

  • @sheelasridhar1987
    @sheelasridhar1987 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Q1 - true
    Q2 -
    Q3 - applicable to adult with unsound mind

  • @ShankarKumar-pr2dw
    @ShankarKumar-pr2dw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ans.3 yes

  • @umangbhabar9658
    @umangbhabar9658 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well it will be better to pronounce Di Li in correct way like doli incapax it should be pronounce dolaaye incapax,animus contrahendaai

  • @writeit123
    @writeit123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u so much Bala sir

  • @contemporaryvlogs9678
    @contemporaryvlogs9678 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Make more videos regarding legal terms 🙏

  • @LawyerinprogressSM
    @LawyerinprogressSM 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    No ,2- answer to Government

  • @afshaanamanzoor7973
    @afshaanamanzoor7973 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow!!

  • @ankitsah6097
    @ankitsah6097 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1)It can be amend by article 368

    • @srijonmishra2207
      @srijonmishra2207 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Refer to Keshavananda Bharati v State of Kerala case. Court cannot change basic structure of constitution

  • @bhavishyagaming4725
    @bhavishyagaming4725 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which happening without intention is a amount to dolli but not count of audult

  • @anujgajbhiye2312
    @anujgajbhiye2312 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir what's the mean of amicus testandi

  • @AmanKumar-pu7fi
    @AmanKumar-pu7fi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Link of other 2 video plz

  • @monipanday3531
    @monipanday3531 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1.false
    2.
    3.

  • @Sourav-sy6yl
    @Sourav-sy6yl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2. Yes

  • @vallurimohansrinivas6026
    @vallurimohansrinivas6026 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well lectured sir🙏

  • @thanksmahamanav1783
    @thanksmahamanav1783 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Q 3 yes

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

  • @Ghoshjit1011
    @Ghoshjit1011 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Q)1()-false

  • @mehulpant5388
    @mehulpant5388 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If no one claims to be the owner then probably it will be a commodity of the STATE.

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

  • @mehulpant5388
    @mehulpant5388 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1 true.

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

  • @ramendra_tomar
    @ramendra_tomar 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ans 2- Wohever finds it.
    Ans 3 - yes

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

  • @lawoneshouldknow
    @lawoneshouldknow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    good work.

  • @_ILB_ShubhamSingh
    @_ILB_ShubhamSingh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ans 1 : true
    Ans2: state
    Ans3: no

    • @samradhmathur
      @samradhmathur 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

    • @springspring73
      @springspring73 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FoolsDenjunior p

  • @aniruddha12345678
    @aniruddha12345678 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Where can I find Part 2 and Part 3 of this series?

  • @adnanansari9500
    @adnanansari9500 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1st- false( no one can change the basic structure of constitution)

  • @kanaklatasingh7755
    @kanaklatasingh7755 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you share the link of other 2 videos..

  • @youtubeofficeentertain...356
    @youtubeofficeentertain...356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you make more videos about legal words?

  • @uttrakhnd7365
    @uttrakhnd7365 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir can you provide me legal history link ?

  • @enjoyananda37
    @enjoyananda37 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Slangs use legal?

  • @roushnikumari3846
    @roushnikumari3846 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sir blat pe video bnaye.....

  • @letsgo5933
    @letsgo5933 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1.true

  • @sakshimaurya6770
    @sakshimaurya6770 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this lecture available for Maharashtra clet

  • @mksharma31
    @mksharma31 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Q1 true

  • @LawyerinprogressSM
    @LawyerinprogressSM 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    3rd no...Yes..this unsound mind

  • @ramakumaridubeycrn4524
    @ramakumaridubeycrn4524 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The first who get that good is the owner of ownerless goods
    Bona vacantia

  • @shreyatripathi9856
    @shreyatripathi9856 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir, Can amicus curiae be used for lawyers?

    • @arpitaprakash9460
      @arpitaprakash9460 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes but as a third party

    • @Jaankari-y2f
      @Jaankari-y2f ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually court decides to appoint a person- expert in one's field or lawyer and organization as amicus curiae.

  • @GauravSingh-bl3wy
    @GauravSingh-bl3wy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plss upload 2nd video for legal term.. I m waiting guru ji

  • @advyogeshpradhan
    @advyogeshpradhan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One suggestion from my side to you is please show us by using these Maxim's in sentences.

  • @nishantkumargiri7149
    @nishantkumargiri7149 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Q1 Ka Answer__false

  • @sheelasridhar1987
    @sheelasridhar1987 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Q2 - state

  • @vandanarana3853
    @vandanarana3853 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ans1 No, it can't amend the constitution

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It can amend the constitution but not the basic structure of the cost.

  • @Hostell-r7h
    @Hostell-r7h 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Que 1 true

  • @vrushaliwaghade8061
    @vrushaliwaghade8061 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir baki do video ki link dekia plz

  • @vickykumar1517
    @vickykumar1517 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1 true

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

  • @shreyagupta6045
    @shreyagupta6045 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Q.1, False

  • @mksharma31
    @mksharma31 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Q3 yes

  • @sahinanai2292
    @sahinanai2292 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Q1false

  • @ramendra_tomar
    @ramendra_tomar 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ans 1- False

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

  • @LawyerinprogressSM
    @LawyerinprogressSM 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir

  • @advyogeshpradhan
    @advyogeshpradhan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    These are not often used practically in litigation.

    • @Jaankari-y2f
      @Jaankari-y2f ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, only half of the total legal terms explained in this video have practical uses.

  • @kavitasharma2712
    @kavitasharma2712 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where is second part????

  • @mehulpant5388
    @mehulpant5388 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3 shaayad use Kar sakte hai.

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

  • @maketradingsimple247
    @maketradingsimple247 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir when is coming next parts of legal terms and maxims

  • @baljeetsingh3904
    @baljeetsingh3904 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍💕💕

  • @mahimaraghav9548
    @mahimaraghav9548 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Government

  • @pauljosef2282
    @pauljosef2282 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The answer of question 2 is cop

  • @irfanhanif3514
    @irfanhanif3514 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    brother your example is wrong for de jure and de facto

  • @harshitverma2675
    @harshitverma2675 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Raftaar bolra h kya like thoko

  • @sureshboggula3350
    @sureshboggula3350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In telugu commentary

  • @radhikagupta4863
    @radhikagupta4863 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    1- F

  • @riyaavallecha5905
    @riyaavallecha5905 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not getting part 2

  • @vickykumar1517
    @vickykumar1517 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    3 no

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

  • @realorainecruz4643
    @realorainecruz4643 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which country is this information intended for?

  • @thug_life1218
    @thug_life1218 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is the second part sir?

  • @niteshchaurasiya6596
    @niteshchaurasiya6596 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    State

  • @shubhamKumar-xg2mu
    @shubhamKumar-xg2mu 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think government can keep the property _ 2 and

  • @lalitbhushansinha7162
    @lalitbhushansinha7162 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1.false

  • @shubhamsayam9546
    @shubhamsayam9546 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where is second part man?

  • @TeghiyaGhulam
    @TeghiyaGhulam 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir next video kahan h?

  • @furqanhaider706
    @furqanhaider706 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    first second and third degree of murder smjhaday please

  • @swarak8617
    @swarak8617 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Answer 1 : false

  • @thanksmahamanav1783
    @thanksmahamanav1783 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Q.1 false

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

  • @akthesniper4384
    @akthesniper4384 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not virus , vires

  • @himanshukhokamnegi8156
    @himanshukhokamnegi8156 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can you please give the correct answers of the question?_😃

    • @FoolsDenjunior
      @FoolsDenjunior  5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Answers:
      1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
      2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
      3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)

    • @MrAnkur11Garg
      @MrAnkur11Garg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks!

  • @VandanaYadav-ud2hr
    @VandanaYadav-ud2hr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    2q govt

  • @coolandgood1010
    @coolandgood1010 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    WHY ARE SO MANY INDIANS UPLOADING LAW VIDEOS??!!?!

  • @dimplegupta2267
    @dimplegupta2267 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Answer is false, because the parliament has no power to amend the basic structure of the constitution.

  • @nandakumarp9179
    @nandakumarp9179 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    👨🏻‍🌾💃🏿👨🏻‍🌾 LIVING IN TODAY'S COMPLEX WORLD DEMANDS SOME EXPOSURE TO LEGAL SYSTEMS , JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS...💃🏿🏇💃🏿 IT CAN ALSO MAKE YOU MORE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SOCIETY AND FRIENDS CIRCLE, AS AN INFORMATIONAL LEADER 🙊👨🏻‍🌾🙊[[ NANDAKUMAR DEVELOPMENT OFFICER LIC KALOOR ]]

  • @riyaneetamishra3381
    @riyaneetamishra3381 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    1 question false

  • @sunithavarada193
    @sunithavarada193 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ITS NOT ULTRA VIRUS ITS ULTRA VIRES .PLZ CHECK PRONUNCIATION

  • @ajorganicfartiliserunit5087
    @ajorganicfartiliserunit5087 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ur 1 question answer is false