Really sir, this is very helpful video for understanding the legal terms in easy way, I have been looking like this video but I couldn't find out. But now I have got such this video which I was looking for. I understand everything on your videos sir, your video is really helpful.. thanks a lot..... I want like this video more..👍👍👍👍
Ans 1. False, because Parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution. Ans 2. State becomes the owner of the ownerless goods. Ans 3. No
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Answers: 1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case. 2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable. 3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
👨🏻🌾💃🏿👨🏻🌾 LIVING IN TODAY'S COMPLEX WORLD DEMANDS SOME EXPOSURE TO LEGAL SYSTEMS , JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS...💃🏿🏇💃🏿 IT CAN ALSO MAKE YOU MORE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SOCIETY AND FRIENDS CIRCLE, AS AN INFORMATIONAL LEADER 🙊👨🏻🌾🙊[[ NANDAKUMAR DEVELOPMENT OFFICER LIC KALOOR ]]
Really sir, this is very helpful video for understanding the legal terms in easy way, I have been looking like this video but I couldn't find out. But now I have got such this video which I was looking for. I understand everything on your videos sir, your video is really helpful.. thanks a lot..... I want like this video more..👍👍👍👍
1.false as basic structure of constitution can not be amend
2. State
3.yes because they are considered to be of innocent mind
Please do make continue video about LEGAL TERM learning, here I learned a lot. Eagerly Waiting for your next legal term Video ..👍👍
Sounds like Raftaar 🔥
Seriously
@@supriyaaggarwal7848 🤓😊
Indeed!!!
So funny
He is
Cool, Mississppi.
True 1st no
No2: government ,no 3,yes..
Ans 1. False, because Parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution.
Ans 2. State becomes the owner of the ownerless goods.
Ans 3. No
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@@FoolsDenjunior Okay. Thank you 😊
@@FoolsDenjunior
Ans-2 : Quasi contract
Yes
" Ultra vires " now easily can remember after relates with variant of "Corona vires" like ultra, bita,gamma 😂
Ans.2 no, ownership is claimef over those goods. in such case the custodian goes to the gov
1. True
Bala sir, good 🤘
1st true
Ans 1. True
Ans 2. The person whoever find it
Ans 3. Yes , this law apply the person of unsound mind .
1. false as parliament cannot amend the basic structure of constitution
No, parliament has no power to change the basic structure of the Constitution.....as said in KESHVANANDA BHARTI vs. UNION OF INDIA case
Good and useful
Bala bala... Nice bala Sir
Sir this video's is applicable for 3yr llb program..
2nd or 3rd part kaha he video ka ??
Q1 - True
Q2 - Government
Q3- Yes
Q1- false
It's very helpful,👍Make some more videos in this topic please.
Q1 - true
Q2 -
Q3 - applicable to adult with unsound mind
Ur preparing for llb sir
Ans.3 yes
Well it will be better to pronounce Di Li in correct way like doli incapax it should be pronounce dolaaye incapax,animus contrahendaai
Thank u so much Bala sir
Make more videos regarding legal terms 🙏
No ,2- answer to Government
Wow!!
1)It can be amend by article 368
Refer to Keshavananda Bharati v State of Kerala case. Court cannot change basic structure of constitution
Which happening without intention is a amount to dolli but not count of audult
Sir what's the mean of amicus testandi
Link of other 2 video plz
1.false
2.
3.
2. Yes
Very well lectured sir🙏
Q 3 yes
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Q)1()-false
If no one claims to be the owner then probably it will be a commodity of the STATE.
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
1 true.
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Ans 2- Wohever finds it.
Ans 3 - yes
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
good work.
Ans 1 : true
Ans2: state
Ans3: no
Same
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
@@FoolsDenjunior p
Where can I find Part 2 and Part 3 of this series?
Where can I find part 2nd Nd 3 rd
1st- false( no one can change the basic structure of constitution)
Can you share the link of other 2 videos..
Can you make more videos about legal words?
sir can you provide me legal history link ?
Slangs use legal?
Sir blat pe video bnaye.....
Sure
1.true
Is this lecture available for Maharashtra clet
Q1 true
3rd no...Yes..this unsound mind
The first who get that good is the owner of ownerless goods
Bona vacantia
Very useful/ with best wishes
Sir, Can amicus curiae be used for lawyers?
Yes but as a third party
Actually court decides to appoint a person- expert in one's field or lawyer and organization as amicus curiae.
Plss upload 2nd video for legal term.. I m waiting guru ji
Bus aane wala h
One suggestion from my side to you is please show us by using these Maxim's in sentences.
Q1 Ka Answer__false
Q2 - state
Ans1 No, it can't amend the constitution
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
It can amend the constitution but not the basic structure of the cost.
Que 1 true
Sir baki do video ki link dekia plz
1 true
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Q.1, False
Q3 yes
Q1false
Ans 1- False
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Hello sir
These are not often used practically in litigation.
Yes, only half of the total legal terms explained in this video have practical uses.
Where is second part????
3 shaayad use Kar sakte hai.
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Sir when is coming next parts of legal terms and maxims
👍👍💕💕
Government
The answer of question 2 is cop
brother your example is wrong for de jure and de facto
Raftaar bolra h kya like thoko
In telugu commentary
1- F
Not getting part 2
3 no
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Which country is this information intended for?
India
Where is the second part sir?
State
I think government can keep the property _ 2 and
1.false
Where is second part man?
Sir next video kahan h?
first second and third degree of murder smjhaday please
Answer 1 : false
Q.1 false
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Not virus , vires
Can you please give the correct answers of the question?_😃
Answers:
1: False, as the parliament does not have the power to amend the basic structure of the constitution, refer Keshavananda Bharti Vs State of Kerala case.
2: If a property is abandoned by someone, the state becomes the custodian of it but if a good is found by someone without an owner, he may retain it until the right owner is found. He may even sell it if it is perishable.
3: No, doli incapax is used only for children under the age of 7 or between 7 & 12 (Section 82 & 83 IPC)
Thanks!
2q govt
WHY ARE SO MANY INDIANS UPLOADING LAW VIDEOS??!!?!
Answer is false, because the parliament has no power to amend the basic structure of the constitution.
👨🏻🌾💃🏿👨🏻🌾 LIVING IN TODAY'S COMPLEX WORLD DEMANDS SOME EXPOSURE TO LEGAL SYSTEMS , JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS...💃🏿🏇💃🏿 IT CAN ALSO MAKE YOU MORE ACCEPTABLE IN YOUR SOCIETY AND FRIENDS CIRCLE, AS AN INFORMATIONAL LEADER 🙊👨🏻🌾🙊[[ NANDAKUMAR DEVELOPMENT OFFICER LIC KALOOR ]]
1 question false
ITS NOT ULTRA VIRUS ITS ULTRA VIRES .PLZ CHECK PRONUNCIATION
Ur 1 question answer is false