Can Su-35 survive against the stealthy F-35?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024
  • What would happen if a flight of F-35s met an equal number of Su-35s? What if one side had to push forward and other side had to defend? How do two planes compare in general? Watch and find out!
    Thumbnail images: US Dod, Mil.ru (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) )
    Music by Matija Malatestinic
    www.malatestini...
    If you really like Binkov's videos, you can support him via Patreon.
    www.patreon.co...
    Subscribe to Binkov's channel for more videos!
    www.youtube.co...
    Follow Binkov's news on Facebook!
    www.facebook.c...

ความคิดเห็น • 4.4K

  • @beng7844
    @beng7844 3 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    A note: second pair of F-35 wouldn’t ever need to turn on their radar, as the AMRAAM can now be fired to track targets via datalink

    • @Gabriel333_
      @Gabriel333_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can you elaborate a bit?

    • @Cheese_Boi1986
      @Cheese_Boi1986 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@Gabriel333_ they fire the missile and someone else directs it

    • @Gabriel333_
      @Gabriel333_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Cheese_Boi1986 Like an ATGM?

    • @Cheese_Boi1986
      @Cheese_Boi1986 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Gabriel333_ na most likely by another radar either the ground or awacs

    • @Gabriel333_
      @Gabriel333_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Cheese_Boi1986 interesting technology

  • @jaimea.3771
    @jaimea.3771 8 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    He honestly deserves more subscribers

  • @LRRPFco52
    @LRRPFco52 7 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    Fundamental flaw in the premises of this scenario is Su-35 cruising at Mach 1.8 with full combat load of missiles and bombs. That just isn't going to happen. Even Mach 1 cruise with that load would suck gas at too fast of a rate to provide for a viable combat radius.
    The other fundamental flaw is the F-35 operating as an interceptor, which it isn't meant for. F-22 rules that roost, and you don't want to show the scenario for F-22 against any of the Su-27 variants.

    • @Aaron-wq3jz
      @Aaron-wq3jz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Most likely it will be f35 intercepting and it probably has a better chance than a f15

    • @LRRPFco52
      @LRRPFco52 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @ANUSH SLAVEIKOV In the 4th decade of highly matured helmet-cued HOBS missiles, any time you see someone talking about dog fighting, you immediately know their level of familiarity with modern air combat.
      The truth is Cy-35C is flying blind against 5th Gen systems, and they know it.

    • @LRRPFco52
      @LRRPFco52 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @ANUSH SLAVEIKOV I know most people don't have any familiarity with aerospace concepts, applied physics, and the environmental conditions that aircraft are normally subjected to, so I'll point out something you might not be aware of.
      As you increase in altitude, the air temperature gets very cold. At only 3000m above sea level, the air is already -5˚ C. At 7000m, it's roughly -24˚ C.
      11000m, it's -56.5˚C
      Not only that, but the F-35 development program was subjected to the same Mil-Std protocols for arctic basing requirements, and is being stationed in Alaska as we speak, just like the F-22 has been for many years now.
      The F-35's RAM is more robust and weather-resilient than the F-22s, and F-22s have been operating from arctic conditions all this time.
      The truth is that any aircraft that is going to fly into the Geopotential of the tropopause needs to be able to operate in -56.5˚ C ambient air. This area is where the F-35 likes to be. Even in hot climates, once it gets into the higher altitude bands, it might as well be in the arctic because these are extremely low temperatures.

    • @LRRPFco52
      @LRRPFco52 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @ANUSH SLAVEIKOV UK and US also, with early lot F-35s that have since worked out that problem. There were delamination issues if they sustained the maximum Mach for certain periods of time.
      That was relayed to the ODT&E people, who solved it and incorporated the fixes into later production samples. No need to make it personal if you didn't learn about this.

    • @Aaron-wq3jz
      @Aaron-wq3jz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @RC213V please stop watching the propoganda

  • @klardfarkus3891
    @klardfarkus3891 5 ปีที่แล้ว +135

    Funny how everyone is so certain of their assessments of these aircraft when all they know about them is the inflated claims of the manufacturers. Salesmen love you guys.

    • @sylvesterbrock1905
      @sylvesterbrock1905 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Ospreys delivered as required. Hillary would still be waiting to see what response would poll the best. I remember Benghazi.

    • @billsmith8605
      @billsmith8605 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      And the fact that the real capabilities, at least for the F 35 are still secret, yet everyone talks in absolutes like they are a Lockheed engineer.

    • @773-o2n
      @773-o2n 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@billsmith8605 yeah lol many of them exaggerated the f35

    • @Superdj_1999
      @Superdj_1999 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You guys think they spend trillions to bluff?

    • @Superdj_1999
      @Superdj_1999 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Also f-35 have a bigger advantage, they have DAS and that means detections from 800 miles away.

  • @TimmacTR
    @TimmacTR 8 ปีที่แล้ว +379

    This guy knows what he's talking about for fuck's sake.. xD

    • @keep22
      @keep22 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      No he doesn't.

    • @TimmacTR
      @TimmacTR 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Horney Char ASMR lol why

    • @davidmorris80
      @davidmorris80 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      TimmacTR Hes left out some aspects but yes he is roughfly on target.

    • @keep22
      @keep22 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Read my response to him.

    • @TimmacTR
      @TimmacTR 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      +Horney Char ASMR Well where the fuck is your response to him?

  • @_Matsimus_
    @_Matsimus_ 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    How can people dislike this. The video is amazing

    • @anguswaterhouse9255
      @anguswaterhouse9255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Salty rossians

    • @familyacounttv6667
      @familyacounttv6667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What?
      You can't dislikes anymore, we live in a post dislikes world

    • @Mikelo220
      @Mikelo220 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@familyacounttv6667 No, it's just hidden. You can use an extension to see dislikes.

  • @bricejohnson4272
    @bricejohnson4272 7 ปีที่แล้ว +156

    Is this the Russian Kermit the Frog?

  • @FelixstoweFoamForge
    @FelixstoweFoamForge 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Just discovered this channel; great stuff! I especially like the way Binkov uses realistic missile performance rather than a "lock on = a kill" approach. Too many people don't realise that when a missile is quoted as having a XXkm maximum range, that's from a front-aspect, at a non-manoeuvring target. And the thing about stealth is that you're only stealthy until you do something aggressive. It's great to have, but doesn't give you a magic sheild.
    Once again, great content, my little Russian hand-puppet!

  • @lhugueny
    @lhugueny 8 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I love your channel Binkov! Keep up these great videos :)

    • @DavidWatersJames
      @DavidWatersJames 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Binkov is really a CIA TROLL. Always biased toward the WEST.

    • @davidpost6164
      @davidpost6164 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      It looks like your the opposite end of the Spectrum Russian Santa Cause with an American Name.

    • @Nobody-ob5od
      @Nobody-ob5od 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DavidWatersJames so what it’s facts

  • @davenewell9137
    @davenewell9137 8 ปีที่แล้ว +235

    Soviet Union vs United States before the collapse of the Soviet Union

    • @laetrille
      @laetrille 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      dave newell
      YES!!!!

    • @zoltancsikos5604
      @zoltancsikos5604 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      dave newell Easy: the Warsaw Pact wins.

    • @laetrille
      @laetrille 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      What time periodbm
      Nope, the Warsaw pact would initially set the initiative by quickly moving thousands of tanks and troops through the fulda gap, but NATOs technological and numbers advantage would slow and eventually stop the invaion. NATO would still not have enough power for a Counterattack butt they would have enough to stop a Soviet advance. This would buy time for the US 2 send carrier battle groups to the Mediterranean this would allowed the allies to flank Russian forces and pave the way for a Counterattack.

    • @TheRobster2007
      @TheRobster2007 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lol, you've been reading too much Tom Clancy kid. Pact forces would easily have made it across Germany and thus triggering NATO's nuclear strike policy.

    • @davenewell9137
      @davenewell9137 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Freely Liberal unless you have never seen any previous vids this guy made, no nuke and no allies is part of the deal

  • @Amin-ij6mi
    @Amin-ij6mi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +366

    Iran vs Saudia arabia Please

    • @hv7043
      @hv7043 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Amin Alsous Saudi would be no where in the world map if Saudi vs Iran happens

    • @Amin-ij6mi
      @Amin-ij6mi 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      littes be real saudia arabia can wipe iran with there air force

    • @The1RedRooster
      @The1RedRooster 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Not with the deployment of Russian S-3&400's in Iranian territory. Saudis do have the ground forces but air-power is out of the question.

    • @metralla
      @metralla 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Saudia Arabia cannot even defeat a group of sandal wearing donkey herders, imagine what would happen against Iran.

    • @satyampatel491
      @satyampatel491 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      America will support Iran over Saudi Arabia soon

  • @HotaruZoku
    @HotaruZoku 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Props for not jumping on the F-35 hate bandwagon. God is that tiring.
    Interestingly realistic scenario here. None of that "The Su out dogfights the F-35 = It's a better aircraft." There's way more to both the equipment and the situations involved than that, as reflected here.

    • @kenworthNH
      @kenworthNH 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was refreshing. The Lightning is going to be a brutal jet to go against. People above calling it a "bomber" and saying it can't dogfight are on the hate bandwagon. Likely they'll never get off it either.

  • @Kouhiko9674
    @Kouhiko9674 8 ปีที่แล้ว +182

    Binkov should be in charge of an allied American and Russian military

    • @Binkov
      @Binkov  8 ปีที่แล้ว +85

      Binkov is retired. Nowadays he promotes world peace.

    • @patricioosuna9587
      @patricioosuna9587 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Binkov's Battlegrounds what conflicts was he involved in while active duty?

    • @devoyinator
      @devoyinator 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      But what about when the aliens attack? We'll all need you then

    • @nickn9040
      @nickn9040 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      All of them.

    • @gamelard1963
      @gamelard1963 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      binkov, you should have a game made. like a type of Total War game or Hearts of Iron type game. i would buy it.

  • @defencebangladesh4068
    @defencebangladesh4068 8 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    wow the comment section is really civilized.....

    • @Thlormby
      @Thlormby 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah, Im actually surprised no ones arguing. *Yet*.

    • @Guide4Ever
      @Guide4Ever 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      we will nuke you, middle east :D jk

    • @memoochoa392
      @memoochoa392 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      I read the comment with an accent. lol

    • @trap3400
      @trap3400 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      *Thats because Russians don't speak English*

  • @rushabhdoshi9532
    @rushabhdoshi9532 8 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    make a video on India vs Pakistan and China

    • @XxAdamIsChaosxX
      @XxAdamIsChaosxX 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rushabh Doshi I would like to see that

    • @Joesolo13
      @Joesolo13 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rushabh Doshi did you see v the turkey vs Russia ones? nationalist in either side will go nuts

    • @rushabhdoshi9532
      @rushabhdoshi9532 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope

    • @rushabhdoshi9532
      @rushabhdoshi9532 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ***** that's sound great.. Because China will be have lots of difficulty to get into India because of Himalayan mountain..

    • @unknownuser1385
      @unknownuser1385 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I can already tell you right now that China would rape India.

  • @superfamilyallosauridae6505
    @superfamilyallosauridae6505 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That USAF claim is from 2005...you know, when the F-35 hadn't even flown yet and they didn't know how stealthy it was going to be. Every time a USAF officer in the know has spoken about the F-35's stealthiness since, they've said it was stealthier than the F-22, while the source you used from 2005 for the RCS size claims the opposite.

  • @Wayoutthere
    @Wayoutthere 8 ปีที่แล้ว +217

    The only war is in the comments section haha. Be prepared for cancer

    • @danijelzubic1430
      @danijelzubic1430 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wouter d.B.

    • @TheOne-he9bk
      @TheOne-he9bk 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wouter d.B. And the cancer will not give for the chemucals of the planes. They launch in or contries. THE MILITARY OF THE UNITED ESTATES LAUNCH THE CHEMTRAILS.

    • @TheOne-he9bk
      @TheOne-he9bk 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      THE RUSIAN MISSULES ARE FOOL? DO NOT THINK SO. AND THE MISSILES GRINGOS ARE ONLY THE SMART ONES HA HA HA HA. PURE LIES.

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no such thing as chemtrails. There are contrails and they are nothing but water vapour/crystals. Get your head out of your ass. I suppose the world is also flat...
      "Contrails are line-shaped clouds produced by aircraft engine exhaust or changes in air pressure, typically at aircraft cruise altitudes several miles above the Earth's surface. Contrails are composed primarily of water, in the form of ice crystals."
      The only remotely close thing is the US's use of agent Orange to kill vegetation in Vietnam. The side effects of that weren't fully understood at the time, but are very real.

    • @notme-y1m
      @notme-y1m 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Best comment

  • @ares106
    @ares106 8 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I'm impressed, this is surprisingly in depth analysis for a silly TH-cam frog video.

    • @nipponese
      @nipponese 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I think he's a lizard?

    • @TheMeelickMafia
      @TheMeelickMafia 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      pepe the frong is now the new symbol for white supremacy

    • @TheRyujinLP
      @TheRyujinLP 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      TheMeelickMafia Or so says the professional liars that make up the main stream media. Pepe is more the anti-establishment mascot now but since the establishment doesn't like that they're losing now, they just label their opposition "racist" or "basically Hitler (TM)" or my new favorite, "Everyone I don't like is a Russian hacker".
      So yeah, so while some dumb ass white racists use it they they are such a tiny minority calling Pepe a white supremest symbol is just as laughable as saying Elmo is a symbol of radical Islamic extremism just because it was found out a handful of Isis members liked Elmo.

    • @ares106
      @ares106 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fox Ace
      You mean like TheRyujinLP? :P

    • @ares106
      @ares106 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fox Ace
      That means being silly/mischievous in my smiley vocabulary.

  • @elijahjoseph3617
    @elijahjoseph3617 8 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    can you do m1 abrams vs t90?

    • @andrewforman6324
      @andrewforman6324 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Elijah Joseph Abrams by a longshot

    • @AR-bk3di
      @AR-bk3di 8 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      Andrew Forman The M1 Abrams is technically better, but the t90 is nearly half the cost.

    • @wgoulding
      @wgoulding 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Elijah Joseph Wouldn't make an interesting video, it would just be M1A2's sniping T-90's from afar.

    • @wgoulding
      @wgoulding 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      M1A2's would still win with with a 1:2 ratio.

    • @poop75018
      @poop75018 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Dont the T-90s have a longer range gun and missile capability though?

  • @KesMonkey
    @KesMonkey 6 ปีที่แล้ว +86

    Why does this scenario have air superiority fighters flying a strike mission and strike fighters flying an interception mission? Weird.

    • @jmarronineto
      @jmarronineto 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Indeed!

    • @usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816
      @usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      a better scenario would be the F-35 doing the strike mission, and the su-35 defending. both are multirole, but that doesnt mean they will be used for all roles most of the time. most likely, an f-35 will be used offensively anyway. it was designed primarily for offence not defence. also binkov didnt really take into account the fact that defending aircraft dont stay in one place. they actually move around across large areas, and in multiple large groups too. likewise, an attacking force would have to be large. a small group of strike aircraft wont do. usually youd use 2-3 times more aircraft when mounting an attack. also, youd need combined arms. just air power alone wont be enough. considering all this, the chances of a fight breaking out suddenly at the flanks is very likely. both sides might not even meet head on.

    • @therealmp40
      @therealmp40 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 Well, but the point is to see how they would perform in a dogfight against each other. You could even argue that realistically they wouldn't even engage in combat because if a war ever is declared between Russia and NATO, the nukes would drop before their jet engines spool up.

    • @usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816
      @usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@therealmp40 the comment above makes a better dogfight scenario that is realistic.

    • @mkd2839
      @mkd2839 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 That's in part 2. This is to assess both in offense and defense

  • @elkhamlichi2558
    @elkhamlichi2558 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I was gonna say ''man it's gonna be hell in the comment section'' but not really
    Good job being civilised

  • @kachel313
    @kachel313 8 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    the Netherlands VS Belgium plz

    • @subtitleaddict5343
      @subtitleaddict5343 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      mef j Is not relationship good between two countries?

    • @computerinsurgent1204
      @computerinsurgent1204 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      There will no Belgium-Netherlands war. But there can break a civil war in Belgium out between Flanders and Wallonia. The Netherlands will support Flanders and France Wallonia.

    • @Bigcheecho
      @Bigcheecho 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      하성태 It is, but the guy has done a war between two currently friendly nations before with UK vs France

    • @isunlloaoll
      @isunlloaoll 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Netherlands would win. The beligum don't have heavy armors (Tanks, light tanks), and the Beligum navy only consists of two frigates and some minesweeper. The Dutch have more soldiers, more equipments (destroyers, tanks, light tanks, more IFVS, oil tanker planes, attack submarines, and amphibious assault ships, etc. All of which beligum lack.)

    • @computerinsurgent1204
      @computerinsurgent1204 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ARVIN At sea the Dutch will kick the Belgium in their ass. And on land too. But the Belgium air force is bigger than the Dutch air Force.

  • @SuperLusername
    @SuperLusername 8 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    Do Croatia vs the rest of the Earth

    • @tibne2412
      @tibne2412 8 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      That's not fair, Croatia would win easily.

    • @lukagecko
      @lukagecko 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hahaha brate si poludio. Tu nema pitanja, nasa pobjeda je garantirana.

    • @SuperLusername
      @SuperLusername 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      petrallen Fair fights are for pussies

    • @SuperLusername
      @SuperLusername 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Luka Gecko Volim pitat gluposti, iako znam da svijet nema sanse protiv nasa 2 aviona i 3 ispravna tenka.

    • @HeyImLarry
      @HeyImLarry 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      The commissar would destroy us all.

  • @Survivaurbatchev
    @Survivaurbatchev 8 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Rafale Vs eurofighter!

    • @FoxMikeHotel
      @FoxMikeHotel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Homer Simpson there is actually no real situations where the Typhoon win, even in dogfight or bvr, but that would be interesting from Binkov that seems to kno what he's talking about most typhoon vs rafale videos are pretty innaccurate

    • @NoFaithNoPain
      @NoFaithNoPain 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not really. This is old information the Eurofighter is pretty much capable of every mission now and continuously evolving. They can be compared in that this scenario is about the fight after the strike. The Rafale really lacks radar range, seriously so. The Eurofighter would achieve lock on much sooner. The SU-35's paint a HUGE radar picture with the massive radar they have and so as soon as it is turned on they are a target at almost any range. They need to bulk out with numbers to overcome that issue. Therefore the Eurofighter would be a clear winner. The Rafale is just straight inferior. However, we don't know the F-35 radar range and resolution for lock-on and we don't know how stealthy it is. So this video is extremely speculative. However, I have spoken to a Eurofighter test pilot at BAe Warton and he is thinking in terms of a 9-1 kill ratio for the Eurofighter against the best Russian fighters (He has flown every NATO aircraft and the SU-30 and MIG-29).

    • @etaylor495
      @etaylor495 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      NoFaithNoPain I agree with you completely but a war against Russia would be more against quantity than quality probably.

    • @FoxMikeHotel
      @FoxMikeHotel 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Shaun Mclaren not at all no, the Typhoon is way less capable, in every training against the Rafale, it gets smashed. and it's not properly multirole while Rafale is, while still being good in about every aspects. you clearly lack some knowledge on the subject

    • @FoxMikeHotel
      @FoxMikeHotel 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shaun Mclaren and Rafale is not cheaper at all

  • @AllYourBaseRBelong2Us
    @AllYourBaseRBelong2Us 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I think you may be overestimating the Su's speed advantage given its external stores and its ability to find/lock the F-35

    • @99Yeti
      @99Yeti 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And how in Ukraine they have gpses glued to the cockpit

  • @rajatvinerkar7651
    @rajatvinerkar7651 8 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    hey binknov plz do a video on India vs Pakistan

    • @gomes8335
      @gomes8335 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      rajat vinerkar India vs China as well

    • @masterm8816
      @masterm8816 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      rajat vinerkar China vs Japan

    • @nickn9040
      @nickn9040 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed! This would be a great choice!

    • @wgoulding
      @wgoulding 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Japan would have a hard time, they're pacifistic and would need US help in the long term.

    • @gelmir7322
      @gelmir7322 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      1 vs 1 Japan dont stand a chance against China.
      Chinese Navy could easily employ naval blockade around Japan cutting of its access to strategic resources such as oil and steel.

  • @blindfoldblaster
    @blindfoldblaster 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Flat earth “theory” just got busted at 0:51

    •  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No one takes them seriously anyway. It's like those people who think Jesus buried dino bones to fuck with anthropologists.

  • @heesingsia4634
    @heesingsia4634 8 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    You used to work for Sesame Street right?

  • @misamisatv
    @misamisatv 8 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Hey random stranger scrolling through the comments...
    Wish you a happy new year

    • @misamisatv
      @misamisatv 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      lol who said i wanted any likes. I can tell 2017 is going to be a GOOD year fo you with your bad attitude (/sarcasm). xD

    • @bnblasercleaning
      @bnblasercleaning 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks mate.

    • @raygiordano1045
      @raygiordano1045 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! Happy New Year, stranger, hope everything works out well for you.

    • @AlfBR6
      @AlfBR6 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks unknown stranger, happy new year to you too

    • @bromazepam781
      @bromazepam781 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      HNY to you too, cure avatar guy/gal.

  • @cruelroalex6722
    @cruelroalex6722 8 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    i was wondering how a direct confrontation between Europe and Russia will go... with no US interference... let's say that US sais: ''guys, we're tired of fighting wars for everybody....we're out on this one''.... cause EU is hard on sanctioning Russia and blaming it for everything...so i would like to know if they can back their claims in war scenario without running behind US's skirt...

    • @kokofan50
      @kokofan50 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Mad Max, no war in human history has ever been fought for purely altruistic reasons.

    • @cruelroalex6722
      @cruelroalex6722 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Mad Max in all fairness, they did save our asses twice... 3 if you count Bin Laden... hell! 4 if you count Hillary....

    • @cruelroalex6722
      @cruelroalex6722 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mad Max a direct war with Russia....where Europe would've been caught in the middle...

    • @cruelroalex6722
      @cruelroalex6722 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Mad Max i'm talking about the US election, damn it!

    • @venkatramakkineni
      @venkatramakkineni 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Without US, I am not sure those sanctions will last a second. The sanctions on Russia serve one purpose, they keep US the unchallenged bully of the world !!

  • @Hoosier_Boy
    @Hoosier_Boy 7 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    I'm surprised they are using the F-35 as a counter measure as a more practical fighter would be the F-22 Raptor. The F-35 is more of a ground/bomber. (As it was designed for.)

    • @solidsnake6206
      @solidsnake6206 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ken s that's what I'm saying su35 is more superior in dogfights then a f35.

    • @desertdude8274
      @desertdude8274 6 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Solid Snake F 35 isnt designed for dogfighting.. This was stated
      . Dogfighting is being phased out with accurate missle systems.

    • @wadopotato33
      @wadopotato33 6 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      The F-35 is actually a capable dogfighter, although it does it in a different way. In Red Flag events it did extremely well against fourth generation aircraft. The F-16 and F-15 have trouble locking onto it.

    • @anthonysaponaro6318
      @anthonysaponaro6318 6 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      Nobody truly knows the absolute capabilities of the F-35

    • @VT-mw2zb
      @VT-mw2zb 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Made in U.S.A: that was sort of the mistake with the F4 having no gun, only missiles, which led to losses to Mig-21s.
      On the other hand, the F35 concept: a big, powerful radar equipped plane with tons of missiles are constrained by the aircraft's configuration. Modern radars can be very powerful, however, they had to fit within the nose cone of a fighter aircraft. AWACS are commercial jet-sized planes with big radars that can easily outrange most puny radars in fighters' nose cone. With the technology to link and communicate targeting information up and down the chain, missile armed planes can rely on bigger AWACS radar for targeting.
      Better yet, why not bigger missiles? Why not bigger aircrafts with bigger radars and missiles with longer range? Assuming the missile work, an AWACS-sized aircraft with powerful radar + super long range missiles can outrange any F35. Just ad a thin crust of short range, gun armed fighters just in case.
      Not my original ideas. Better man than I stated the case:
      www.the-american-interest.com/2007/09/01/breaking-the-bank/

  • @DNowlan1
    @DNowlan1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Binkov - many thanks for sharing this and for taking the time to look into this. That being said I have a few questions for you. It's no great military secret that the stealth shaping of the F-35 is optimised in the X-Band and above in the forward aspect only. On side view this breaks down quite drastically leaving the F-35 open for detection, particularly if their flying combat spread of 60km+ across. Did you take that into consideration? As a case in point LockMart are so nervous in the late 2000's they wouldn't let Danish test pilots fly that type of formation in the simulator. The other thing to consider is the IR signature of the F-35. You may or may not be aware of the rubber insulation for the fuel cooling breaking down for the wing tanks. So at 30000 ft and above you have a differential of 140 deg C over a wing area of 42.7m^2. This would drastically increase the range the IR sensors would detect the F-35. Did you take that into consideration?

  • @Jinseual
    @Jinseual 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is like a sesame street for war gamers.

  • @amirulfarhan919
    @amirulfarhan919 8 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    so 5th generation fighter have a bad day vs 4.5 generation fighter

    • @amirulfarhan919
      @amirulfarhan919 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      just think what Pak Fa can do to F 35...

    • @jasontownsend9460
      @jasontownsend9460 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amirul Farhan well what the pak-fa can or can't do is more or less unknown and unproven at this stage. They have only 8 prototypes at the moment. The pak Fa is Russia's first stealth aircraft. The f35 is the US' 5th. The US has a track record with its other stealth airframes and have made much more progress on the f35 than the Russians have on the pak fa.

    • @овсянкапетрович
      @овсянкапетрович 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Amirul Farhan- Су-35с свободно сделает F-35

    • @neutron9555
      @neutron9555 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Amirul Farhan Pak Fa can punch hole through the sun, then make a black hole in it and throw all evil western f35 planes inside of it, as soon as it gets its engines finished.

    • @neutron9555
      @neutron9555 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Actually in last red flag f35 scored 20/1 against g16s. F35 pilots were newbs and f16 pilots were top guns.

  • @stephenduxfield-karyakin3778
    @stephenduxfield-karyakin3778 7 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    First off I'd like to say I like your video, it is well made and you clearly have researched everything thoroughly.
    Having said that, I can't quite agree with your conclusions. To start with, it is impossible to believe that high value targets, in a tense geopolitical situation and with 4 F 35s flying CAP would not have continuous AWACS support. The AWACS aircraft that should be there would spot the incoming Sukhois many hundreds of miles away, and with the F35's data fusion capabilities they could maneuver into optimum firing position against the Sukhois and launch their AMRAAMs without ever even turning their own radars on, mid course guidance would be provided by AWACS. The only warning the Sukhois would have would be when the AMRAAM terminal seeker heads go active, and this would be mere seconds before impact. Avoiding missile impact would be miraculous in this case, and the Sukhois would almost certainly be wiped out.
    If we were to accept your scenario and have the F35s unsupported by AWACS (unrealistic as that is), I also cannot accept the Sukhois having a firing solution on the F35s with their R77s more or less concurrent with the F35s getting firing solutions on the Sukhois.
    The AMRAAM that will be used on the F35 is the AIM120D, which will without any doubt have a longer range than the R77. Additionally, your scenario envisages the Sukhois coming in at low level to avoid, or at least minimize, radar detection. This will work for the ground based radars (the Sukhois will be flying below the radar horizon) but won't work for the F35s' radar. A fully armed Sukhoi Su35 is not in the least bit stealthy, and the F35 will have no problem detecting it at very long range, particularly as the Sukhois will be flying over the sea. Seeing as the F35s will be flying at high altitude and transonic or even supersonic, the F35s will be in theoretical AMRAAM range substantially sooner than the low and slow Sukhois will with their already inferior R77s. The Sukhois will be fired upon repeatedly for several minutes before they can even think about firing back, and that's assuming they will even be able to detect the F35s.
    You say also that the Su35 enjoys a speed advantage over the F35. This is true if both planes are flying clean at the same altitude, but in your scenario the Sukhois are flying at low level (where the air is thicker) and with wing stations fully used (creating drag). The F35s on the other hand are flying clean (as all armament is carried internally) and at high altitude (where the air is thinner). They will easily outperform the Sukhois for speed.
    Lastly you are very optimistic that the Sukhois will detect the F35s with their own radar at such range. The F35 may not be quite as stealthy as say the F22, but it is still a low observable design, and (when the F35 points its nose at the emitting radar, offering its smallest cross section, which it will be doing in your scenario) it won't be picked up on radar until it is very close, likely much closer than the scenario envisages. This means the Sukhois won't even see anything to shoot at for many minutes, while being shot at from unseen enemies and likely taking serious losses.

    • @aidenmcknight2884
      @aidenmcknight2884 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They said that the planes ascend once the ground radar detects them

    • @spawnpeekcentral1399
      @spawnpeekcentral1399 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jesus, that was very informative thanks

    • @DashFlicks
      @DashFlicks 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      an astute observation, hats off to you. however, It is important to point out, that the Russian armada rebuilds as a defensive force built for continental offensives with subs and other strategic weapons, including bio, as naval offensive weapons. Russian territorial geometry and position speaks for itself. It will likely build one or two aircraft carriers in the future for peace time missions only. I doubt f-35 tech will remain stealth for longer than a decade, giving the lidar tech advance. both domestic engine designs will likely be modified and kept secret. Dogfights are more or less matter of the past and F35 is primarily a strategic bomber. I find this scenario probable but it wont be critical. imo, strategic maritime routes will be defended with subs, if at all. In the end, numbers will decide the all-out wars and simplicity of weapons, output and repair output, logistics and supply lines are more important than slight tech differences, as seen in nearly all previous major world conflicts. Any of these scenarios has to be post nuclear. There is absolutely zero chance of US-RU conflict without at least two waves of all out nuclear salvos with active AWACS and Hi altitude weapons as primary target.

    • @blackjack.888
      @blackjack.888 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Why do you still firmly believe in the relevance of stealth technology, the downed F-117 has long put an end to this technology . Stealth technologies are more or less effective against third-country radars operating in the X-band of 8-12 GHz, and locators on ultrashort waves of 30 MHz-3 GHz perfectly see invisible planes. The Pentagon is well aware of this , but if you officially recognize the failure of this technology in modern realities, it means huge financial losses of defense enterprises

    • @mikaels6009
      @mikaels6009 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      All that and Serbs shot down a stealth b2 bomber in the 90s lol. Bro stop thinking, with all you analytics, the Russia's just can't simply compete. It's extreme naiveness.

  • @somezsaltz4526
    @somezsaltz4526 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    i like how do don't favor on side over another

    • @SiimAlas
      @SiimAlas 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here :D

    • @Thessaloz
      @Thessaloz 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      To be honest here, F35 probably have better electonics than we saw. In this situation they won't lose so many planes. Especially on the defence

    • @glennfrazier4873
      @glennfrazier4873 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thessaloz George he gave a 2 to 1 kill ratio AGAINST su35, and you think because it's american and cool it would do better? if you asked any f35 pilots if he was at war with russians flying su35s and they would lose 2 f35 but kill all the enemy, they wouldn't like it, but they take that win.

  • @herewardofliverpool1662
    @herewardofliverpool1662 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Personally if Liverpool fc win the premiership title this season i`ll take them all on with a Sopwith camel , a cigar, a Union Jack flag and a Browning 9mm pistol.:)

  • @Violent2aShadow
    @Violent2aShadow 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    California vs Texas!

    • @MilesStratton
      @MilesStratton 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am okay with this as a californian. our guys would probably be too busy struggling with the bullet buttons and mag locks to reload anyway...

    • @bestamerica
      @bestamerica 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Violent2aShadow
      California vs Texas!
      '
      it is a one north america...
      no need state

  • @commanderroddi7742
    @commanderroddi7742 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    about ranges: F-35's missiles (AIM-120D AMRAAM) have a range of 75+ cvt; that's at the far end of the range. However, it is unlikely that the SU-35 would detect the Lightnings on radar (or IR seasons) until the lightnings are within 20 to 40 miles, well within a very lethal envolope of the Lightnings. Furthermore, it is likely that the rear pair of lightnings would use the radar to track and illuminate the Flankers, and while the Flankers would think the threat is further away, (Let say, 60 to 80 nmi or even 100, or at the far end, 200 miles?) the missiles are coming from, let say, much less than 40 nmi). AIM-120s won't start illuminating with their own seekers until the terminal phase of the attach, so that may give Lightning a further edge if the SU-35s don't detect the launch of the AMRAAMs, but even if they do and considering the effectiveness of AMRAAMs, , I think it is Very unlikely the Flankers would ever fire first, and by the time they're aware of an enemy, the Lightning may have fired all their misses and be pulling back for the second pair to attack from a different location. Tactics like this have scored 15 to 1 kill rations for F-35 against non-stealth (But very capable, aggressor pilots at RED FLAG (who are some of the best pilots int the world)). The Kill ration for F-22 with similar tactics is even more impressive in simulated combat against non-stealthaircraft. . I think this scenario, video, while interesting, gives too much credit to the SU-35's ability to shoot first, and detect the Lightnings, and ignores how big of an advantage stealth and stealth tactics make in such a defensive scenario.
    Yeah, I disagree that Lightnings would launch at the "edge" Maybe if lightnings used the older AMRAAMs with 50 nmi but the newer D variant they use would be far from the "extreme" range. I'm doubtful a single Lightnings would be lost in the defensive scenario for the lightnings., while I belie all SU-35s would get wipe before reaching the target.

    • @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я
      @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я ปีที่แล้ว

      The SU-35 radar sees targets with an RCS of 0.1-0.5 (this corresponds to F22 in different frontal projections) at a distance of about 250 kilometers. F35 probably has a higher RCS, so it will be visible further. The Su-35 has R37M missiles with a launch range of 300 kilometers and a speed of Mach 6. It can also transmit data to air defense systems.
      F22 is visible at a distance of 100 kilometers in the infrared range for the SU-35. SU 35 has a radar with a viewing angle of 120 degrees (2 times more than that of US aircraft). Air defense sees stealth aircraft from the ground at a distance of 300-400 kilometers. The radio horizon at an altitude of 5 kilometers is 250 kilometers, air defense will see such an aircraft at this altitude and is capable of destroying
      . US and NATO aircraft have no chance against Russia near the borders with Russia.

  • @laetrille
    @laetrille 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You forgot to include that the F-35 can target and fire Standard Missiles from navy ships.
    Also, you have to take in to account that the F-35s APG-81 is magnitues more powerful than the SU-35s PESA radar.

    • @keep22
      @keep22 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's the SM-6. And current F-35's can't do that until block 4.

    • @laetrille
      @laetrille 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Horney Char ASMR
      Ok, but the capability is deployed on some F-35s, during a test a few months ago, the capability was demonstrated.
      www.raytheon.com/news/feature/sm-6_first_of_a_kind.html

    • @laetrille
      @laetrille 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      www.raytheon.com/news/feature/sm-6_first_of_a_kind.html

    • @laetrille
      @laetrille 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Horney Char ASMR
      Join me on Google+ lets create a anti Russian troll army

    • @keep22
      @keep22 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      laetrille That was the test plane. It has the software to guide SM-6 missiles beyond the horizon. The aircraft that has that capability right now are the E-2D Hawkeye's. And every Carrier Strike Group that deploys near "concern areas" always has a E-2 in the air. That bird has a 400+km detection and tracking capability.

  • @blackmesa232323
    @blackmesa232323 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Say what you will about the F-35, the fact that it has a tiny radar cross section really does give it quite advantage.

  • @isodoublet
    @isodoublet 8 ปีที่แล้ว +421

    You're ignoring one thing though.
    Russian.
    Hackers.

    • @SuperGeronimo999
      @SuperGeronimo999 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Chinese hackers are far worse...

    • @isodoublet
      @isodoublet 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      SuperGeronimo999 Russian hackers would hack the f-35s and make them explode in midair.

    • @MrQwerman
      @MrQwerman 8 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      avicenna and make them vote for Trump, I assume?

    • @isodoublet
      @isodoublet 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      MrQwerman You got it! Damn those deplorable f-35s.

    • @SuperGeronimo999
      @SuperGeronimo999 8 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      avicenna Don't forget they steered the airliners into world trade center too.

  • @ivanbuljanvanboelken4676
    @ivanbuljanvanboelken4676 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well what kick ass video. Superb.

  • @leo333333able
    @leo333333able 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    he seems to really know his shit

  • @Its_shiki_time4876
    @Its_shiki_time4876 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    you are very good at your job

  • @littleredbull1140
    @littleredbull1140 8 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Can you do Russia vs Europe?

    • @gnochhuos645
      @gnochhuos645 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +A Ginger Ewok USA won against Russia alone on Binkov's older video so you should remove the ally part

    • @unknownentity2617
      @unknownentity2617 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Well the Russia vs USA battle he did was only an arena battle that put each country right next to each other unrealistically. The USA vs CHINA video had mobilization as a factor since it showed that the US could only realistically move so many forces overseas. Id like to see a video showing NATO forces throughout Europe, and how each force would ultimately react should war break out.

    • @littleredbull1140
      @littleredbull1140 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Vietnam Mapper That is very true, I think it would actually be better without USA's support, thanks 👍

    • @flyingdutchman6330
      @flyingdutchman6330 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      true we don't need some Americans throwing nukes around

  • @ossusmaximus226
    @ossusmaximus226 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you admiral BINKOV!

  • @skeletonwguitar4383
    @skeletonwguitar4383 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Seeing how Indonesia's Sukhois purchase is in jeopardy, and the government is begging the US to sell Indonesia F-35 after making pressuring them to cancel, this is going to be a baseline overview of which one is "better" or "good"
    But with my personal bias... GET THE SUKHOIS PLZ

  • @JoeOvercoat
    @JoeOvercoat 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Before I head on over to Part 2/2 I just have to say the Su-35 is simply gorgeous. The F-35...not so much.

    • @Wasattsi
      @Wasattsi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This comment confuses me. I find it to be the exact opposite, with the F-35 looking sleek and beautiful while the Su-35 reminds me of a nose.

  • @shabdikacharyya2516
    @shabdikacharyya2516 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    During the Pakistan India standoff in 2019 pak f16d launched over 6 ammram at the su30's. Not a single missile got a chance to their target.while in between a MiG-21 managed to get a R73 lock on to a f16 and took it down.
    Note- The su 30s had a top speed of around mach 1.9 where as the f16s has around mach 2.1
    Some people say this was just luck while some compared the pilots training skills. I would say the west has too much confidence in its equipments but in practical that simple doesn't matter.
    N.B- And binkov will never change he will always stand with the western fancy equipments.

    • @stanleywong58
      @stanleywong58 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The expert analysis (whatever value you may put on them) was that the Pak AIM 120s were fired at range at the Su30 MKIs . While this produced no hits, the Su30s were deterred from closing to launch their own BVRs (this not being an "all-out" engagement). If that were true, the mainstay of the IAF fighter fleet had been effectively neutralised by a weaker opponent possessing a relative handful of AIM 120s. Indian sources write that their Aster should be a partial solution until more Meteors are acquired.

  • @bobc4368
    @bobc4368 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice job 😁

  • @siegfred4868
    @siegfred4868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    F35A got 145 confirm kills and 7 losses in an Exercise.

  • @КирилКирилов-щ4к
    @КирилКирилов-щ4к 7 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    No need for airplanes. Sylvester Stallone (Rambo) and Chuck Norris will all deal with all the armies in the world.

  • @krism4276
    @krism4276 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The SU-35 needs to replace it's Irbis PESA radar with a more powerful AESA radar, like the Zhuk AE, or the one mounted on the Pak-Fa

    • @wgoulding
      @wgoulding 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Kristi Mitri AESA's are super expensive (~40-60 million). Russia lacks the funds to do that, especially with sanctions and low oil and gas prices (they make up ~50% of the budget). Russia would do better to spend it on better training, and probably on better ground forces. There was a joke amongst NATO officers during the Cold War that went like this: Two Soviet generals run into each other in a Paris cafe. One asks the other, "By the way, who won the air war?"

    • @krism4276
      @krism4276 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Wynton Goulding Goddammit I knoe

    • @wgoulding
      @wgoulding 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Victor Katilis ?

    • @UltraTotenkopf
      @UltraTotenkopf 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wgoulding *Tell this joke to American pilots who flew in Korea and Vietnam, and ask what the losses of the US Air Force during these conflicts are! ;-)*

    • @wgoulding
      @wgoulding 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@UltraTotenkopf 😂 Vietnam was bad, but only in comparison to the kill:loss ratio's of what came before (Korea) and after (Gulf War). There was still a 3.8:1 kill ratio against Migs in Vietnam, and before that in Korea, it was 5.6:1. And let's not ignore the fact that while Soviet planes were in general of cheaper / lower quality than western planes, the west were still able to produce comparable numbers of planes if not more due to the large aerospace industry. Also, a point that needs to be made is that in both conflicts, look at who owned the airspace over the battlefield. It's not the Chinese/North Koreans, and not the North Vietnamese. In neither conflicts did US forces come under any significant air attack, while in both conflicts, the allied air forces were able to provide close air support without fear of enemy fighters. The only real danger was in bombing raids deep in enemy territory. Even then, western pilots, planes, doctrine, and support personnel outperformed their opponents consistently.

  • @carlosszr
    @carlosszr 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Another great analysis. Gratz

  • @Chiyenworkout
    @Chiyenworkout 8 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    South Korea VS North korea

    • @bestamerica
      @bestamerica 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Art of street work out
      South Korea VS North korea
      '
      both koreans are still same one korean language

  • @LordDarthHarry
    @LordDarthHarry 8 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Angry Russians incoming at 5.....4.....3.....2....

    • @Dwight511
      @Dwight511 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      No... the only thing to be angry at is irrational moronic idiots like you who claim something is better than another without analysis, sources and logical reasoning. Unfortunately that's 99% of people commenting on YT. This video is good, but it could have been at least backed up by simulations(Command: Air/Naval ops application) instead of model assumptions.
      Also, don't forget that in this scenario the F-35 was supported by ground based radars which gives them a huge advantage.

    • @LordDarthHarry
      @LordDarthHarry 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Im jsut saying. They come in raging whenever Russia doesnt dominate in these scenarios. Remember the "Turkey vs Russia" videos. They were raging there because it wasnt a total steamroll victory. (angry Turkish nationalists were also raging of course)

    • @nickn9040
      @nickn9040 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry to go off topic from the rage but holy Hell Command is complex. It's great fun but just keeping up with the tutorial is difficult.

    • @romeor6231
      @romeor6231 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      That was the whole point. To see how they would do on the defense. While the next video they will be on the attack. So your last point is moot.

    • @ghostrider.49
      @ghostrider.49 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      +LordDarthHarry Funny thing I was scrolling down here and I didn't see a single angry Russian hahahaha, yeah right man... And you are comparing Turks to Russians ? Turks rage on like fucking crazy ! On every single *someone* vs Turkey video they rage. Russians are tiny in comparison to the angry brainwashed crazy Turks. Every second comment I see is from a proud Turkish nationalist, and only a matter of them from the Russians. Besides, 99% of those Russians are also trolling, learn to take it lol. P.S. Not from a Russian :)

  • @itsdimitriymedvedyev
    @itsdimitriymedvedyev 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    4.5 gen Su-35 vs 5th gen F-35.
    Next do T-50 PAK FA 5th gen vs F-35 or F-22.

    • @maxklinger1494
      @maxklinger1494 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It would fare a bit better, but it still lags behind in some key areas.

    • @sparkyplug28
      @sparkyplug28 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      funkierfawn budgie very little point when Russia only have 3

  • @PhilipMReeder
    @PhilipMReeder 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing you left out/missed. AWACS. AWACS is another level of radar coverage (airborne) which enables friendly aircraft to receive real time data and radar lock, while not risking detection by using its own radar. This mixed with the F35's superior IR detection HAS to increase its effectiveness and survivability. But overall, a good video!

  • @gabrielviana369
    @gabrielviana369 8 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Brazil vs Venezuela (Brazil with the Gripen NGs)

    • @exioz99
      @exioz99 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Gabriel Viana brazil is a shit hole

    • @gabrielviana369
      @gabrielviana369 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ballistus lol no

    • @1MuchButteR1
      @1MuchButteR1 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      South Brazil is pretty developed. North Brazil is just favela land.

    • @gabrielviana369
      @gabrielviana369 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      1MuchButteR1 lol, North Brazil is just jungle, the favelas are just in Rio

    • @Guncriminal
      @Guncriminal 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Venezuela is screwed financially, so I don't see how it can fight a war.

  • @globaltrident5341
    @globaltrident5341 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    US being the attacker would be more realistic, as history shows.

    • @claytontaylor5577
      @claytontaylor5577 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Apparently you haven't looked at Russian history on war.. It well surpasses the U.S... In recent years yes the U.S. is the aggressor but in total history it doesn't come close to Russia..

    • @globaltrident5341
      @globaltrident5341 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@claytontaylor5577 You've only watches history channel.

    • @claytontaylor5577
      @claytontaylor5577 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@globaltrident5341 I lived in Europe for a while and visited military museums in Moscow and you clearly are clueless. Actually do an honestly good research and then make a comment. Facts are facts regardless if you don't agree. I love and respect both countries due to my mother being from Russia and father from Texas. The U.S. has been in many wars back to back but you have to look at the entire age history of the country.

    • @globaltrident5341
      @globaltrident5341 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@claytontaylor5577 The difference between US and Russia is: USA was founded to rule the world and therefore needs wars. Russia is a normal country as any other of the world too and therefore has no interest in war. In a nutshell.

    • @claytontaylor5577
      @claytontaylor5577 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@globaltrident5341 Russia many disputes with other countries over land even though its the biggest country by land mass.. Was many wars with their south neighbors taking land over the course of history.. recently Ukraine and Georgia and having disputes with Japan over land. Every country in the world wants to control their own destiny and be superior to others to gain influence for the better of their people its just some has the power to try to do so and some don't.. The Chinese dynasty,Turkish empire,Roman empire,Japan,Germany,Britain,Russia,Spain and the U.S. and many more All at some point now and throughout history has had global dominance through war and control. Eventually the U.S. will lose power and another will take its place as the super power and may possibly be worse. Everyone is a hater until it's their turn in history to control then defend their own reasons. Just most plays innocent until they have the power to change their course like China is doing now bullying its neighbors in the sea. You live in a fake reality to believe some countrys will always be innocent and some will always be evil..

  • @peterjenkins6837
    @peterjenkins6837 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's a fairly good analysis, but it doesn't correctly model how the SU-35's speed and maneuverability are limited when carrying a full weapons load. The SU-35s carrying the ground attack weapons would be especially affected.

  • @sharkbite5744
    @sharkbite5744 7 ปีที่แล้ว +203

    Su-35 is simply a stunning looking plane, but realistically it would be shot down before it had detected the f-35.

    • @sharkbite5744
      @sharkbite5744 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Rick Stuifzand why thank you my man!

    • @anthonysaponaro6318
      @anthonysaponaro6318 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The Russians have always made beautifully capable Air show fighter planes.

    • @paulkersey9899
      @paulkersey9899 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I think the f35 is a much better looking jet

    • @knowsmebyname
      @knowsmebyname 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ha! that is good comment Anthony. SU-35 is gorgeous. Paul that's the first time I have heard that about the F-35. I had thought that the only redeemable physical quality of the F-35 is that it's not the X-32.

    • @thecoolnerdplaysvr5674
      @thecoolnerdplaysvr5674 6 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Look. I'm a maintainer for the F35. You have no idea how good this jet is. Its good enough to take on a F22 and win. Most of the information is classified. the Su wont even know the 35 was there. but that 35 would have locked on. Theres a lot of cool stuff that can be done. Trust me. Russia has no chance

  • @AirShark95
    @AirShark95 8 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Chile vs Peru

  • @Yp3ri0n
    @Yp3ri0n 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    If you want to be realistic and fair , try one Su-35 vs 10 F-35

    • @thomasD215
      @thomasD215 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The su 35 has no chance against the f35 not a chance. The f35 would own them before the su even knew it was there

    • @javier8341
      @javier8341 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@thomasD215 f-35 is a useless arcraft today for the news radars incomming, in a dogfiht su-35 can beat them easily mig-35 too. and f-35 is too slow for escape away from a df.

    • @miroslavstefanov9196
      @miroslavstefanov9196 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@thomasD215 they said that even 30 years old F 16 beats the F 35 in dog fight. F 35 is more like electronics warfare jet. The thing is they are not fully invisible they can be detected by most Russian radars because the F 35 is dependent on the radar absorbing coating and it's shape isn't made at all to reflect the radar waves as some other "stealth" jets before it. For the radar coating that absorbs the radar waves must be as thick as the waves length which means that on lower frequency radars with few meters length of the wave it need few meters of coating to absorb it which is impossible to put on the jet thus it can probably be detected by waves with length of 10-20 cm. This is why the russians didn't try to make a stealth jet for so many years but if they had the US tech it would probably be more beneficial to them because US mostly uses precision radars with much shorter waves.
      Before you go yapping bullshit go and do some reading on how shit works🙄🙄

    • @timmyburden5701
      @timmyburden5701 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@miroslavstefanov9196 The SU35 will easily show up on the F35 radar. Also thanks to the link it will also show up on every F35 in the area. The F35 will be very hard for the Su35 to detect. Allowing the F35 to fire their missiles first and having a huge advantage. He who fires first usually wins. By the time the Su knows its being fired upon its probably to late to do much.

    • @Dwight511
      @Dwight511 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Battle between Su-35 vs F-35 at BVR is determined by the MRAAMs that they posses. (R-77-1 vs AIM-120D) AIM-120D utterly destroys the R-77-1 in performance. F-35 will win most of the time. The Su-35s need to develop a tactic that will enable them to get closer to the F-35 before the fight begins. Otherwise it's absolutely ineffective, the R-77-1 won't do shit!!!

  • @kidpagronprimsank05
    @kidpagronprimsank05 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    No, by the time Su-35 get into the range that its radar can detect F-35 (they use the word low-observable for F-117, B-2, F-22 and F-35 for the reason) F-35 will blasted that Su-35 out of the sky well before that

  • @2017NationalChamps
    @2017NationalChamps 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This didn't age well.

  • @StanislavLuminous
    @StanislavLuminous 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    3:02 Radar cross section in Bdsm :-D

    • @mrmr2055
      @mrmr2055 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      😕

  • @ShortHandedNow
    @ShortHandedNow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow this video aged like absolute dog shit.

  • @ramincybran
    @ramincybran 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    fantastic - very agrresiv calculation

  • @boyteebah3794
    @boyteebah3794 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    please do a guns dogfight between su-35 and f-35

    • @rowandoggo
      @rowandoggo 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      boy teebah but that's not a realistic scenario. the F35 was designed to launch missiles and drop bombs on targets. if you really want a dogfight scenario, Su-35 vs F-22 Raptor

    • @oguz4070
      @oguz4070 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      you re quite right

    • @carlitosXCool
      @carlitosXCool 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      F-22 Raptor would annihilate Su-35, that's not fair man lmao

    • @rowandoggo
      @rowandoggo 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Victor Katilis​ WVR? Sorry, not everyone is privy to your acronyms.

    • @flyingdutchman6330
      @flyingdutchman6330 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      WVR is an acronym for within visual range, another word for it is dogfight and refers to air to air combat where both the combatants can see each other and they are trying to maneuver their noses into position to shoot the other down either using heat seeking missiles, cannons, or unlikely but possible radar guided missiles, this is like the dogfights you see in top gun.

  • @Coyote_Cerrd
    @Coyote_Cerrd 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i hope you know i watch f-35's fly over my house almost every day so i can learn about them and i bet they are gonna make the F-35 lightning II better! and the f-35 has a helping hand! just saying

  • @AdurianJ
    @AdurianJ 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    F35 in a NATO setting benefit for the massive air to air refueling capability of that alliance.

  • @11tigerclaw11
    @11tigerclaw11 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Things that you need further consideration: *LPI radar modes. *Internal jammers being used much earlier in the engagement. F-pole advantages. Also the R-77/K-77M is not dependent on the firing aircraft only for mid course corrections.

  • @VOVAN781000
    @VOVAN781000 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Su-35 has long been fighting successfully in Syria.
    In what real battles did the F-35 take part? What are the results?

    • @massineben7198
      @massineben7198 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      to this day, they did not get in any real battles. US navy hopes that the F-35C will be the first F-35 to see action

    • @demanischaffer
      @demanischaffer 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      VOVAN781000 According to the Israeli Airforce the F35i has seen combat in Syria

    • @virgilius7036
      @virgilius7036 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Su-35 never fought aircrafts over Syria because islamists dont have one!

    • @ufosweekly8702
      @ufosweekly8702 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ok and american f-22 has been in more fights than yours. And the f-22 is even are old planes so you just look stupid

    • @demanischaffer
      @demanischaffer 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 "could confirm"
      Like whom?
      The IAF already has pictures of it's F-35's over Beirut, what reason would the IAF have to lie?

  • @Dolphin665784
    @Dolphin665784 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Su-37 vs Eurofighter Typhoon.

    • @EvoSwatch
      @EvoSwatch 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Su-37 is only a technology demonstrator

  • @Razielmn
    @Razielmn 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    china vs Russia would be interesting. Who's with?

  • @Koshzor
    @Koshzor 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great analysis! Really good job.

  • @SMVB-cl6oc
    @SMVB-cl6oc 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    but if the mission was in bad weather the f35's would not be allowed off the airfeild lmao

    • @demanischaffer
      @demanischaffer 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      cheeki breeki *false* the last F35 weather restrictions were lifted in 2015

    • @stevecherk1022
      @stevecherk1022 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      lightning no longer afraid?

  • @ondrejbublavy7952
    @ondrejbublavy7952 7 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    YOU CAN'T FORGET, IT GREATLY DEPENDS ON PILOTS... :)

  • @realdxb
    @realdxb 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Famous "highly likely"

  • @stepnikrysa
    @stepnikrysa 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I remeber my military era on 1986-7 on czech military airbase.
    We were able to track F-111s over Alps . Tamara, Vera. 8-bits "homemade" comps driven passive radars.
    Raytheon bought it (No, it was not "tunneling" of the Czech company Tesla Pardubice) late 90´s.
    Very usefull as we saw in Syria today.

  • @truerespect4247
    @truerespect4247 8 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Russia VS United Kingdom, No nukes

    • @hobbyistcontrarian4389
      @hobbyistcontrarian4389 8 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The Russian Navy would be obliterated, and then the war would end because invasion by either side is logisticallh impossible.

    • @Sinisterium-YT
      @Sinisterium-YT 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hobbyist Contrarian nah, russian navy is one of the best in the world, russia would easily win with an invasion of the British islsnd

    • @hobbyistcontrarian4389
      @hobbyistcontrarian4389 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Joseph Stalin No, the Russian Navy is a mess. Most of its ships are mothballed, sitting in port, flying an ensign so that their skeleton crews are entitled to be paid, gently rusting. Just look at the awful service history of the _Admiral Kuznetsov_. Not to mention the Russian economy is crumbling under the mildest of EU sanctions.

    • @Thlormby
      @Thlormby 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Russia would brutally beat the UK down. It has almost more of everything than the UK does, including power.

    • @truerespect4247
      @truerespect4247 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cannon Fodder I dont know they would need a navy to invade britian, and thats wont be happening with britians defence and russias rusty navy

  • @moch.fadilpratamaputra1144
    @moch.fadilpratamaputra1144 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    how can SU-35 with no strategy>?
    this is just F-35 perspective

  • @darthimperius8057
    @darthimperius8057 8 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Do Croatia vs Serbia :)

    • @vladancekic6634
      @vladancekic6634 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      slazem se

    • @darthimperius8057
      @darthimperius8057 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Da i nas netko spomene :D

    • @johnydomino
      @johnydomino 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Druže dosta je bilo tih zajebancija ovde..

    • @bromazepam781
      @bromazepam781 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A s cime bi se to bili? Nasi hameri iz donacija bi crkli negde oko Osijeka, dok bi njihova avijacija... cek', koja bre avijacija? Oba aviona su im pala. Dakle, nema rata, jer nema s cime.

    • @bromazepam781
      @bromazepam781 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zapravo, gresim - mogli bi da naoruzamo vojske blokovima cokolade sa rizom (Hrvati KRAS-ovu "Dorinu" a mi Pionirov "Mony"), pa da se vojnici gadjaju njima.

  • @LRRPFco52
    @LRRPFco52 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another problem I see are the pk numbers listed for the AMRAAM. You mentioned the general acronym "BVR" with stats from the Gulf War. Most of the BVR missiles fired in the Gulf War were AIM-7, which we don't use anymore. There is a huge gap in performance between the AIM-7M and AIM-120A, let alone the AIM-120D-4.
    Also keep in mind that unprecedented levels of development and cyclical testing have been transpiring for many years now with the highly maneuverable QF-16 drones we use, with extreme flight envelope parameters able to be tested on an airframe that has a lower RCS than either the MiG-35 or Su-30 and Su-35, with faster instantaneous turn rate. They have been able to test AIM-120D-4 and AIM-9X against these, then make programmatic changes to the architecture of the AIM-9X and AIM-120D.
    Most of the testing is done on BVR shots with AIM-120D, including advanced self-protection jamming and countermeasures used by the QF-16 to simulate the latest threat profiles of the MiGs and Sukhois.

  • @CallsignYukiMizuki
    @CallsignYukiMizuki 8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A-10C vs Su-25 (Whatever is the latest variant) when it comes to CAS

    • @lxsc9080
      @lxsc9080 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      both are known as flying tanks the SU-25 has a small boost for anti radar and jamming.

    • @donsessions6436
      @donsessions6436 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      +Lx sc you do realize that the A10 engines are designed that way so if they are hit 1 the explosion dose minimal damage to the rest of the plane and 2 they are spaced apart so it is harder to hit both engines it was designed to fly with only one working

    • @CallsignYukiMizuki
      @CallsignYukiMizuki 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Lx sc
      The A-10C can also carry ECM and the way the A-10's engines are position also makes it harder to get hit. If I recall, the A-10's engine also creates less heat sigs

    • @lxsc9080
      @lxsc9080 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same thing with the SU-25 and Russian jamming is better off as of right now sense they are able to jam AESA radar. Their both good I just like the SU-25 specs more. Also the engines on the A-10 have proven difficult in the passed gulf war. You could also argue that the A10 is more battle tested because of the gulf wars compared to the SU-25 which has only seen limited Air ground combat.
      But in sheer electronics alone the SU-25 is just better the A-10 was never designed with jamming or electronics in mind.

    • @donsessions6436
      @donsessions6436 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep the A10 is just a flying gun in a titanium shell

  • @Jstars200
    @Jstars200 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    If f-35 use meteor missile, I cant see anything today challengins it in a dog fight or even come close

    • @robertlarsson9929
      @robertlarsson9929 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      But they cant use meteor missiles can they, as of today its only the Gripen and Eurofighter who can do this. They will in a distant future be able to use a less effective version but that is years from now.

    • @usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816
      @usaisthebestiockdownpoiice816 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      rafale will get it too. in fact very soon.

    • @dailycoffee8533
      @dailycoffee8533 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertlarsson9929 if the Europeans have the Meteor Missle so does be the U.S.

    • @robertlarsson9929
      @robertlarsson9929 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, Rafale will be the last European fighter to get it, half a decade after the Gripen. But it will only have a one way datalink since its an Rafale. The rest of the Europeans have a two way datalink on their missile, so yes they will have a meteor missile in a year or two since they are testing it out but its not really something to brag about great missile but feels more like a missed opportunity on a Rafale.

    • @robertlarsson9929
      @robertlarsson9929 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dailycoffee8533 , I dont know about that, there is no mentioning about this anywhere, this is actually a concern that the US and the nations who bought the F-35 is falling behind with their missiles. The only plane that is going to have it is the F-35 in 2025? (according to plans which will probably be delayed, since we are talking about the F-35). The F-35 Meteor will also be less effective since they have to shrink it and modify it to be able to fit it on a F-35 I also think it will only have a one way datalink like the Rafale? Basically USA went all in for the one airplane with Stealth that would rule the skies but its not working out great and Israel the one nation that has been using the F-35 in combat expects the stealth features to be ineffective in just a few years time since Russia/China is working overtime on cracking this. Europeans instead opted for developing data/radar/electronic jamming warfare to be able to fire Mach 4 missiles at maximum radar distance.

  • @korencek
    @korencek 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    author says everything russian is old technology, even su-35 which have the latest technology integrated.

  • @greatwhiteape6945
    @greatwhiteape6945 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! This is deep!

  • @kardanium
    @kardanium 7 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Вся проблема автора видео в том, что F-22 и F-35 сильно отстают от Су-35 по маневренности.
    У Су-35 больше шансов уйти от ракеты. Аргументов тут несколько: У Су-35 вектор отклонения тяги может отклоняться на 360 градусов, в то время как у F-22 / 35 только на 180 градусов. Применение радиопоглощающих материалов в конструкции фюзеляжа сильно снижает прочность корпуса самолета. Этим F-35 похвастаться не может. Из-за угловатой конфигурации планера (конструкция в угоду малозаметности) портятся аэродинамические характеристики планера. Это тоже недостатки F-35. Су-35 может быстро изменить свой курс, развернувшись практически на месте. Видеороликов с этими маневрами можно найти в интернете много. Поэтому по маневренности Су-35 лучше, чем F-22 и F-35.
    Мало того, автор видеоролика сильно недооценивает возможности РЭБ Су-35. Система РЭБ там достаточно мощная, чтобы ослепить радар противника на большом расстоянии или создать фиктивное местоположение цели на экране радара противника.
    Проще говоря, в США и в России используют абсолютно разные способы обеспечения малозаметности самолета. В США мучаются с материалами и конфигурацией фюзеляжа, что малоэффективно, дорого и теряются некоторые возможности. В России делают большой упор на электронные системы подавления радаров противника. Это дешевле и эффективнее. Вплоть до обеспечения полной невидимости для радаров противника даже старых самолетов. И летные характеристики не портятся.

    • @samsungedge5096
      @samsungedge5096 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Россия должна разработать новые воздушно-воздушные ракеты. Они должны сделать их больше для большего диапазона и поместить их с радарами и детекторами, чтобы летать самостоятельно. И, как вы сказали, F-35 не может перехитрить ракеты, такие как Су-35. Таким образом, ключ - это более дальнобойные более интеллектуальные ракеты.

    • @Дмитрий-й8з7я
      @Дмитрий-й8з7я 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Андрей Батищев развивать баллистику ракет дешевле и технологии на голову выше любых маневренностей самолетов,уже давно ясно что в современном бою нет места маневренности тк сбрасывание скорости пропорционально увеличивает шанс на сбитие,это утопия-самолеты бля парадов в итоге

    • @RuslanKrylev
      @RuslanKrylev 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      что??? "вектор отклонения тяги может отклоняться на 360 градусов" ??? о_О это как так, расскажите ))

    • @OussamaKheireddineNehar
      @OussamaKheireddineNehar 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Бинков не русский, он американец с русским акцентом./ Binkov is not Russian, he is an American with a Russian accent.

    • @Strelich0
      @Strelich0 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      У ~дальнобойных ракет (аля AIM-120 и R-77) активный участок полёта относительно непродолжительный, потом ракета летит по баллистичесской траектории с подруливанием. На больших дистанциях высокая маневренность самолёта может помочь именно увернуться от ракеты.

  • @walkercobb2808
    @walkercobb2808 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I know this video is super old, but I feel like this is a bit of a mismatch. The F-35 is more similar in role to the MiG-35 than the Su-35.

    • @tomnimy_5956
      @tomnimy_5956 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah the su-35 is the Russian air superiority fighter so it would be more comparable to f-22 and the multirole fighter of the Russians is the su-30sm

    • @89turbomk3
      @89turbomk3 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Even tho the f22 is primary aircraft for air superiority, the us Air Force didnt built enough. The f35 is going to make for the lack of air superiority role

  • @ADMIN-cg2wd
    @ADMIN-cg2wd 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    my left hand vs right hand

  • @Lord_Shadowz
    @Lord_Shadowz 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    The F35 has a system that cools the entire plane including the skin to lower its infrared picture. I just thought I'd mention that. It's amazing all of the technology they placed into one small aircraft.

  • @snitchhello1040
    @snitchhello1040 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I am a SU-35 mechanic and I am smoking crack.

  • @ВасилийИванов-з5ъ9ь
    @ВасилийИванов-з5ъ9ь 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    F-35 looks like Conor MacGregor. Good show, Good marketing, Good money.
    Su-35 looks like Habib Nurmagomedov. Just Kill pupet and... this all.

  • @modap3000
    @modap3000 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    F-35 wasn't design with rear aspect stealth in mind. Once they turn, it's over.

  • @bizzwoofer
    @bizzwoofer 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting. Well-done editing.

  • @BrianKedersha
    @BrianKedersha 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is a fairy tale. The F-35 is a bomb truck, it will not be sent in a pure air to air fighter.

    • @dootdoot1867
      @dootdoot1867 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are a few variants of an f-35...

  • @MrDantres
    @MrDantres 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    SU-35 BEAUTIFUL!