@@Rudenbehr And the video might have been even older than that. It was only uploaded on youtube in 2010. And, of course, making their product commercial that are getting released to the public HD probably isnt their top priority
The Electro Optical - Distributed Aperture System - DAS is a fantastic addition to pilot awareness. This advancement helps all F-15 pilots do what only the best of the best have been have been able to accomplish in the past. It, essentially, makes our entire pilot compliment into 100% top gun level operators. Distributed Aperture refers to the ability of the F-15 computer to take information from sensors around the aircraft and convert is into a 3-d environment similar to the Virtual Reality available in many games these days. F-15 Pilots are able to see all areas of the combat environment including below and to the rear of the aircraft as though the aircraft was invisible. (To DAS and its pilot, it is.) The difference is that DAS is real live data that gives the pilot immediate knowledge of the wartime environment of the jet aircraft. Top Gun level pilots have been able to do some of this in their heads by interpreting visual and instrument cues in their brain. Now all pilots have this ability.
@@patewing5808 And, I assume that you are senior engineer at Northrop Grumman for you to be so certain about such a system? Or do you have a F-35 pilot or technician as a friend who shares classified information about cutting edge systems?
@@jurajsintaj6644 Kid I am more then qualified to talk about F-35 then you can imagine . Degree and 40 years of experience in radio physics . So called " stealth " and diffraction phenomena is something I do . Let me tell you something about US military complex . It is purpose is profit not defense of US . The people who write about this stuff in the popular ‘science’ and ‘technology’ media have absolutely NO scientific knowledge or professional credentials whatsoever…they simply repeat the nonsense they are told by various publicists working for the defense industry, and have no proper scientific education to tell what is plausible and what is not…The buzzword ‘fifth generation’ is completely meaningless…it is just a gimmick dreamed up by PR people in the US defense industry in order to create hype among the uneducated and clueless public, so that these companies, like Boeing and Lockheed, can get massive amounts of taxpayer cash for completely unreal and unscientific stuff like so-called ‘stealth’… It’s a magic money machine, based on parlor trickery, and that’s all…
This system has been improved and will be installed on attack helicopters as well.. I'm sure the super Hornets and other aircraft will also be getting the systems and share targeting data and other information
Хорошая аэродинамика самолетов, но технологии, воздушные суда, транспортные средства были изменены.А по аэродинамическому принципу строительства самолетов, вино самотеком с помощью новых физических законов.То, что сейчас скрывается за словами НЛО или летающая тарелка-это только приложение силы тяжести технологии, с набором новых функций для физических.Невидимость для радаров и невидимости в видимом спектре видимости,в то же время, способность летать в пространстве и во времени. Скоростные характеристики гравитационных самолетов, просто не доступны военных самолетов, в том числе и F-.35
Good aerodynamics of the aircraft, but the technology, aircraft, vehicles have been modified.And on the aerodynamic principle of the construction of the aircraft, the wine is by gravity with the help of new physical laws.What now lies behind the words UFO or flying saucer-this is only the application of gravity technology with a set of new features for the physical.Invisibility to radar and invisible in the visible spectrum of visibility,at the same time, the ability to fly in space and in time. Speed characteristics of gravity of the aircraft, just not available for military aircraft, including F-35.
Все эти ваши мультфильмы всего лишь желания. В реальности эти самолёты способны воевать только с противником у которого нет систем ПВО и современных самолётов истребителей! Посмотрите как Израиль не может применить ваши самолёты потом что у Сирии есть системы ПВО... А все мультфильмы где F35 уничтожает российские С400 это просто фантастика!!!
@atmodom What happens when the Typhoon or Rafale has its radar jammed? DAS is only one of multiple targeting systems on the F-35; for off-bore radar tracking, the F-35 has the AN/ASQ-239 electronic warfare radar suite and for forward / long range target tracking the APG-81 AESA radar in the nose. That's 2 systems providing 360 degree tracking and 3 tracking within an angle inside the forward hemisphere.
DAS seems to be a insightful deterrent for future enemy threats. Not that we are currently being threatened, but for those who wish to challenge, may think twice. For those too ignorant to understand the need to be on top, This Technology will also leak down toward other products that make our world safer in all forms of transportation. I applaud DAS.. and recommend a song for use during exercises. put some Flare on it and call it DAZZ from the Music of Brick 1976. lol
Trigonometry everywhere. Trigonometry, Spherical Trigonometry, Euler Angles, Trigonometric Equations, Delaunay triangulation, Propulsion Systems, Chemical reactions, Turbines, Fluid Mechanics, Aerodynamics, The Boundary Layer Theory, Quantum Dots, Nanotechnology,... etc etc. In fact The Air Force is lot of Physics and Mathematics :D
Gotta say thats pretty fckn impressive and to consider that there are many more classified secrets to this thing maybe it really doesn't need to get in a dogfight afterall
In creating the aircraft experienced a technical revolution to change the aerodynamic principle of the creation of aircraft which is used to create planes came gravity.Eliminated the need for the wings in jet engines running on kerosene and in many other ways.
Here there is something non-human: it is worth to detain attention in this miracle, and it is already impossible to tear yourself away from admiration. It's exactly the same as falling in love!
1) Do only US F 35's have the best DAS (or also the Israeli ones, those of the NATO countries that want to buy the F 35 or already have signed a contract ? 2) How does DAS make a distinction between militairy trucks, ambulances, militairy trucks disguised as ambulances etc. ? 3) Can't DAS be countered by new ECM leaving the multi million system virtually blind ? Add that prospect together with better and more mobile radars and the main advantages of the whole expensive packet might be gone through the drain before very long. Don't forget the plane is supposed to last for the next 30 years. That are quite a number of years either to catch up via spionage and own R&D or to developed effective counter measures. 4) Isn't it such a complex system, that it will be "out" every two weeks, resulting in far too many F 35's in repair ?
1) If there are going to be upgrades to the DAS system that are hardware upgrades, its likely that the US will receive them first, simply by the nature of it being the main producer of the system. Other nations will most likely slowly receive the upgrade as well, of course. 2) The combination of radar, the much larger IR camera on a swivel under the turret, and the DAS create a relatively high definition picture of the target. I am pretty sure theres a demonstration somewhere on youtube, Ill try to find it. But at that point, its up to the pilot to decide. Also disguising military equipment as medical/civilian while its a combatant its a warcrime. 3)No. DAS is a collection of IR cameras. To jam it, you would practically need to do the equivalent of pointing an IR flashlight at the plane, which would be really short range. And to do that, you would also need to find and track the aircraft. And it can also use the radar to detect ground targets. 4) It is not a complex system hardware wise, as it is just IR cameras. It is complex digitally, however. Digital bugs may occur, but fixes can be done quickly, to every single F-35 at once, instantly.
This F-35 advanse hight technology look awesome and impresive but I hope that the President or Congress dont reduce buget to this full program because then will be a handicap F-35 as was the measure to F-22 Helmet Raptor replacing the Hud display.
Look awesome and impresive, only I hope that the President and Congrees dont cut buget to this full F-35 program because then will be handicap and crap F-35. If some dont know yet, the F-22 Raptor had cuts as Helmet Vision hud meanwhile in 2008 the Typhoon was testing their Helmet Hud in Nellis A Base, Red Flag exercices.
no i hope they pour another 1.5 trillions in it, before calling it a dud. that will teach lockheed to make planes, that actually deliver what they promise, on time.
@atmodom 2:15, that's what happens. Also, 'flying cow' is an inaccurate description, in the September 2011 issue of Airforces Monthly they had this to say "... in terms of manoeuvrability the F-35 will be cleared to 50° angle of attack, similar to the F/A-18 Hornet, with a full load of munitions inside." Also, manoeuvrability may not be as important as you think it is, most modern air-to -air engagements tend to be at long range where the F-35's advanced systems make it lethal.
have you figured out how to eliminate double imaging on the hud, when more than one sensor picks up the same signal? Or are the Pilots still turning it off?
Its just a dot product of forward vector of vector location of helmet vs vector location of hud. If it scores >0.75f, the DAS linear interpolates its opacity from 100% to 0% as it nears 0.90f. Literally every fighter with a HMD does this and has for the last 20 years.
this coupled with the 100 kilo laser, nothing could hit it. save the missiles for some thing else! it could take out every ground and air target in a extremely short amount of time. the only nee for missiles are large fortified targets? ( bunkers ect.) tanks ect. can be taken out with laser! missiles would be for well over the horizon targets??
tim mcquearysr There exists no laser currently that could be effective against bunkers or tanks. Especially none that can be airborne. A tank would take ridiculous amounts of time for a laser to have an affect on it.
Все эти ваши мультфильмы всего лишь желания. В реальности эти самолёты способны воевать только с противником у которого нет систем ПВО и современных самолётов истребителей! Посмотрите как Израиль не может применить ваши самолёты потом что у Сирии есть системы ПВО... А все мультфильмы где F35 уничтожает российские С400 это просто фантастика!!!
Too bad your information is hopelessly out of date. The BAE HMD is a backup that only addresses the jitter issues the VSI HMD had with night vision. The BAE HMD is on its way to being cancelled now that VSI has a grip on the jitter issues.
This is the reason why the F-35 is so expensive! so high tech for your money to carry! expensive gadgets always better than cheap ones! like cellphones!
Izno Iznogoud, that's BS. Rafale OSF’s IRST was a disappointment. The OSF-IT omitted the IR channel altogether. Some Rafale F3s supposedly were even delivered without the OSF. OSF-IT has detection range of 85 km on a clear day. OSF-IT is use for identification not for IR tracking *ODF-IT will be cued by radar, Spectra*, or Link-16. The twin IR channels present in the Rafale F2's OSF will be absent from the OSF-IT. Otherwise, it would have been necessary to address the obsolescence and performance issues affecting the IR portion of the Rafale F2's OSF that are today entering service. To sum it up, the OSF-IT will make do with the TV sensor. This system will be an improvement over the current one (but without an increase in range, since this would have required changing the focal mechanisms), which can already be cued by radar, Spectra, or Link-16, thus allowing it to detect aircraft at 85km, to separately distinguish the multiple aircraft in a flight at around 40km, and even to detect a formation break before it is seen on radar, which provides an undeniable advantage. Nevertheless, the absence of the dual-channel IR will de facto prevent passive air to air combat at night." From Technologie & Armement supplement of the June 2007 Air Power:
Kemampuan Teknologi EO-DAS Pesawat F-35 belum mampu dirancang oleh Tim KFX / IFX. Saya yang sudah mampu merancang Sistem EO-DAS yang setara dengan Sistem F-35 dalam Proyek Pesawat ANFX versi saya. Uji Terbang ini menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak seluk-beluk Teori Dasar dan Integrasi Sistem dan sinkronisasi perhitungan Mekanika Terbang yang lebih inovatif yang harus dikembangkan sendiri dalam perancangan. Jadi ini sudah bisa saya aplikasikan sejak 12 tahun yang lalu, sekarang makin saya sempurnakan saja. Tim KFX / IFX belum mampu, masih belajar berkreasi sampai tahun 2024 nanti, masih bodoh mereka. Presiden JOKOWI harus diingatkan tentang pemborosan anggaran pembangunan di Proyek KFX / IFX ini. Periksa kembali Master Plan-nya yang korup itu, ganti anggota Timnya yang masih lambat mikir, makan gaji buta dari negara. Saya sekarang punya validasi Design Requirement & Objective (DRO) dan data-data Kemampuan Tempur Pesawat ANFX rancangan saya yang sudah bisa dijual tahun 2015 ke Lockheed Martin untuk diintegrasikan dengan assembly Pesawat F-35, atau diproduksi secara tersendiri.
Wah hebat bgt bapak ini sudah berani menandingi capabilities by Lockheed martin. Any avionics dalam f35 saja masih classified. Bapaknya sudah bisa menandingi millions codes super computer integrated f35..... Hebat bgt sampai aku tidak percaya
The shoot back missile has half the range of a shoot forward missile because it is expending extra fuel turning in ways conventional missiles do not, so it would only scare off a pursuer who's lining up for a gun kill. This is why 99% of missile fighting is moving your airplane into a position where the missile you're firing has to do the least amount of turning to hit the enemy (has the best kinematics). Modern SAM can fire on the move and detect in bands the F-35 isn't stealthy in, so DAS is a bit useless in that respect. Not to mention DAS is something plenty of other aircraft have (Gripen etc), it's not some new invention. Also DAS and reverse firing missiles can be installed on a WWII prop bomber, if they were so powerful as to make turning useless, why even pay hundreds of millions for a jet airframe?
I totally agree -- scrap the F-35 and install the Electro Optical Distributed Aperture System (DAS) on the FA-18E/F Super Hornet. The unfortunate F-35 is a complete lemon, and will, no doubt, go down as one of the greatest failures in aviation history. The F-35 began its development as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) in 1992 -- Yes, 25 years ago!!! Yet Initial Operational Capability (IOC) has only very recently been declared in the USMC and USAF in very corrupt testing schemes. And Full Operational Capability (FOC) has not been attained by any service's F-35s, and won't be for quite some time. That means the F-35 remains not fully combat ready. It still has a laundry list of unresolved significant problems, yet over 200 F-35s have now rolled off the assembly lines. That means that all current, and many future F-35s will need extensive rework. At least the Navy has had the good sense to not embrace the F-35, and to purchase the failed aircraft in very limited numbers, as politically required. It is quite clear that the F-35 will be THE LAST aircraft that will be developed for all three flying branches (Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps), and the F-35 program is nothing short of being an albatross/white elephant, and complete waste, fraud, and abuse to United States' and participating countries' taxpayers.
@@casey19660 but Lockeed is started plant withTatas Indian MNC in South India to supply F21=F22 raptor For medium combat India seems hesitant on the deal
Buddy. The thing can carry A2A missiles. And also the F-22 still exists, and the only reason there aren't more is Congress being stupid and forgetting price goes down the more something is produced.
There wasn't a lot of new tech here. This system isn't the only one that can provide over the shoulder shots at the enemy. I think SAAB can even do it with the Gripen. Plus i noticed one of the other fighter's was a SU27 and another a Euro fighter, so what your saying is no other country will be challenging with anything more than a fourth generation fighter jet in future? Plus all the SAM's were out in the open, a desert in one scene and a green empty field in another. I do not think their commander will be in charge for long.
A lot of this technology is old. The Russians created the helmet mounted HUD, the Apache Guardian helicopter has all the sensors, stealth is based around the F-22 and the voice activated stuff is SIRI. I believe the F-35 is failing because there are literally hundreds of different contractors and sub contractors around the world making the parts for these things so there is a lot of room for corruption.
+orlock20 This is a very naïve viewpoint. DAS ist completely different compared to a "basic" HUD. Yes - it all started with an HUD - but it is like saying, that the first IBM PC and a contemporary PC have the same capabilities - and while in theory they are - in reality they aren't! Your latter part of you analysis isn't an argument either. Yes - some of the delays and cost overruns happened due with it... but the whole program had to be restructured and since then made far better progress... and the F-35 is already fielded and deployed [even not with 100% of their final capabilities].
th-cam.com/video/k3b-b762QRY/w-d-xo.html Super Hornet's high AoA+minimum turn radius advantage holding it's own against F-15's high energy turn rate advantage dogfight example Original source (non-English) suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/ Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish) nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/ More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot. I quote _Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo_
@@ciudadmafiosamafiacityarri1859 EEUU sigue siendo el número uno en tecnología y armamento civil y militar incluso se sostiene que tienen una red de naves espaciales en la órbita terrestre
Stop the cap. Stop the cap RIGHT NOW, stop the cap. You are NOT selling me on an IRST with both the raw Agility AND sustained thrust necessary to pull a damn 180 degree turn, and then kill, off a PASSED MERGE.
@@ermaclenista2259 Turkey's always been on the ruskis side. Only reason they're in NATO is because of their highly strategic position and so no one can touch them.
Aircraft built on aerodynamic principle lose aircraft which use gravity(magnetic electric)principle.Летательные аппараты которые строятся на аэродинамическом принципе проигрывают летательным аппаратам которые используют гравитационный(магнитно электрический)принцип.
Синтез Ядерный истребитель перехватчик Гладиатор.Применения гравитационных(магнитно электрических) технологий позволило создать аналог НЛО. Гравитационные технологии позволяют создавать искусственную невесомость управлять временем(ускорять или замедлять) что позволяет поглотить импульс РЛС быть невидимым в оптическом спектре и Т.Д.Что бы вывести F-35 из строя достаточно на дним пролететь Гладиатору электроника перестанет функционировать.
Your name gave me a bigger laugh than your illogical comment, :D MuhaMAD Naz(r)i ! Got to say that the connetations of the word play was just so perfect.....
If Russian radar can detect the F-35 or jam it's electronics (probably) this aircraft wouldnt stand chance against the SU-35 fighter. We are relying on a tech superiority that may not exist to level they expect. If at all. You simply cannot assume that against a modern military. We need aircraft that OUTPERFORM their aircraft. And NOT rely on wishful thinking.
Funny how enemy's AA systems aren't even deployed anymore by any potential future threat F-35 would need to deal with,lol.Where's S-400 or future 500,Panzir-S1,Tor-M2,Buk-M2 and others,lol.Current SAM systems don't need to hide when they see this plane longer before it ever sees them ,lol.Also why aren't new Russian planes shown in the video,like Su-30Mk2,Su-35.Mig-35?Video shows those planes unable to engage F-35 from long distances,lol even though their radars see it almost 300-400km away.
Most advanced fighter ever, but it appears Northrop Grumman made the commercial in the 90's. All we're missing is a couple of freeze frames
The core design of the fighter was finalised in the late 90s, so that's not wrong
Eh, one would assume that creating modern, high end, beautiful commercials for military equipment isnt very high up on the priority list.
Northrop!
You are a multi billion corporation and can't have your videos in HD!?
The computer doesn't need hd hd is for entertainment remember that
Lmao, what a crack. But I've seen some Music videos from 2010 or before with same quality
Lol
HD was kinda hard in 2010 on TH-cam.
@@Rudenbehr And the video might have been even older than that. It was only uploaded on youtube in 2010. And, of course, making their product commercial that are getting released to the public HD probably isnt their top priority
Thanks to all our viewers for helping us reach more than 900,000 views!
DAS pretty cool!
hehehe u have job for Software Engineer??? LMAO
a cartoon that has nothing to do with the real truth of air combat
@@ВЛАДИМИРШ-б6й When's your Su-57 Pak Fa Talon going to start mass production? In real life, not cartoon animation?
Jesus it took you 8 years to get twice the views
The Electro Optical - Distributed Aperture System - DAS is a fantastic addition to pilot awareness. This advancement helps all F-15 pilots do what only the best of the best have been have been able to accomplish in the past. It, essentially, makes our entire pilot compliment into 100% top gun level operators.
Distributed Aperture refers to the ability of the F-15 computer to take information from sensors around the aircraft and convert is into a 3-d environment similar to the Virtual Reality available in many games these days. F-15 Pilots are able to see all areas of the combat environment including below and to the rear of the aircraft as though the aircraft was invisible. (To DAS and its pilot, it is.) The difference is that DAS is real live data that gives the pilot immediate knowledge of the wartime environment of the jet aircraft. Top Gun level pilots have been able to do some of this in their heads by interpreting visual and instrument cues in their brain. Now all pilots have this ability.
Thomas Lee U most be aware that were ECW come in to play by receiving information admitting aircraft dail in on data then counter measures is applied.
That is very frightening what it's capabilities are , it's amazing
only thing is in reality it is not going to work and DAS system is nightmare so unreliable
@@patewing5808 And, I assume that you are senior engineer at Northrop Grumman for you to be so certain about such a system? Or do you have a F-35 pilot or technician as a friend who shares classified information about cutting edge systems?
@@jurajsintaj6644 Kid I am more then qualified to talk about F-35 then you can imagine . Degree and 40 years of experience in radio physics . So called " stealth " and diffraction phenomena is something I do . Let me tell you something about US military complex . It is purpose is profit not defense of US . The people who write about this stuff in the popular ‘science’ and ‘technology’ media have absolutely NO scientific knowledge or professional credentials whatsoever…they simply repeat the nonsense they are told by various publicists working for the defense industry, and have no proper scientific education to tell what is plausible and what is not…The buzzword ‘fifth generation’ is completely meaningless…it is just a gimmick dreamed up by PR people in the US defense industry in order to create hype among the uneducated and clueless public, so that these companies, like Boeing and Lockheed, can get massive amounts of taxpayer cash for completely unreal and unscientific stuff like so-called ‘stealth’…
It’s a magic money machine, based on parlor trickery, and that’s all…
This system has been improved and will be installed on attack helicopters as well.. I'm sure the super Hornets and other aircraft will also be getting the systems and share targeting data and other information
Thank you for all you do
Хорошая аэродинамика самолетов, но технологии, воздушные суда, транспортные средства были изменены.А по аэродинамическому принципу строительства самолетов, вино самотеком с помощью новых физических законов.То, что сейчас скрывается за словами НЛО или летающая тарелка-это только приложение силы тяжести технологии, с набором новых функций для физических.Невидимость для радаров и невидимости в видимом спектре видимости,в то же время, способность летать в пространстве и во времени. Скоростные характеристики гравитационных самолетов, просто не доступны военных самолетов, в том числе и F-.35
Good aerodynamics of the aircraft, but the technology, aircraft, vehicles have been modified.And on the aerodynamic principle of the construction of the aircraft, the wine is by gravity with the help of new physical laws.What now lies behind the words UFO or flying saucer-this is only the application of gravity technology with a set of new features for the physical.Invisibility to radar and invisible in the visible spectrum of visibility,at the same time, the ability to fly in space and in time. Speed characteristics of gravity of the aircraft, just not available for military aircraft, including F-35.
Все эти ваши мультфильмы всего лишь желания. В реальности эти самолёты способны воевать только с противником у которого нет систем ПВО и современных самолётов истребителей! Посмотрите как Израиль не может применить ваши самолёты потом что у Сирии есть системы ПВО...
А все мультфильмы где F35 уничтожает российские С400 это просто фантастика!!!
@@РенатРоссия-ь3еpropagandaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
@@РенатРоссия-ь3еhow come su-35 got shot down 💀
@atmodom What happens when the Typhoon or Rafale has its radar jammed? DAS is only one of multiple targeting systems on the F-35; for off-bore radar tracking, the F-35 has the AN/ASQ-239 electronic warfare radar suite and for forward / long range target tracking the APG-81 AESA radar in the nose. That's 2 systems providing 360 degree tracking and 3 tracking within an angle inside the forward hemisphere.
I hope the DAS has better resolution than this video.
A video of a video of course leads to resolution loss.
Is tuition it fib,. Rst,. Ultimately fib
youtert
@@Sm00thieK Car 765
It a scam
DAS seems to be a insightful deterrent for future enemy threats. Not that we are currently being threatened, but for those who wish to challenge, may think twice. For those too ignorant to understand the need to be on top, This Technology will also leak down toward other products that make our world safer in all forms of transportation. I applaud DAS.. and recommend a song for use during exercises. put some Flare on it and call it DAZZ from the Music of Brick 1976. lol
Trigonometry everywhere. Trigonometry, Spherical Trigonometry, Euler Angles, Trigonometric Equations, Delaunay triangulation, Propulsion Systems, Chemical reactions, Turbines, Fluid Mechanics, Aerodynamics, The Boundary Layer Theory, Quantum Dots, Nanotechnology,... etc etc. In fact The Air Force is lot of Physics and Mathematics :D
Yum, yum, yum!!!
The military industrial complex is fucking rad we need to double the defense budget
💀
Why tf did I get recommended to this video 14 YEARS LATER
Gotta say thats pretty fckn impressive and to consider that there are many more classified secrets to this thing maybe it really doesn't need to get in a dogfight afterall
wow I didn t know this company has a youtube account maybe I gotta check lockheed martin and boeing too
At 4:24 they were targeting vehicles around Angels Stadium 😳
😂
In creating the aircraft experienced a technical revolution to change the aerodynamic principle of the creation of aircraft which is used to create planes came gravity.Eliminated the need for the wings in jet engines running on kerosene and in many other ways.
DAS my boy,go F-35.
Here there is something non-human: it is worth to detain attention in this miracle, and it is already impossible to tear yourself away from admiration. It's exactly the same as falling in love!
I would say I feel sorry for our enemies but- no; I don't feel sorry for them.
@landry KAMGA bwahahaha yea whatever moron.
nice cartoon for "good night kids" ha ha ha - if you're so strong try it-cowboys
1) Do only US F 35's have the best DAS (or also the Israeli ones, those of the NATO countries that want to buy the F 35 or already have signed a contract ?
2) How does DAS make a distinction between militairy trucks, ambulances, militairy trucks disguised as ambulances etc. ?
3) Can't DAS be countered by new ECM leaving the multi million system virtually blind ? Add that prospect together with better and more mobile radars and the main advantages of the whole expensive packet might be gone through the drain before very long. Don't forget the plane is supposed to last for the next 30 years. That are quite a number of years either to catch up via spionage and own R&D or to developed effective counter measures.
4) Isn't it such a complex system, that it will be "out" every two weeks, resulting in far too many F 35's in repair ?
DAS is just infrared cameras placed around the jet, to defeat das you would have to defeat a infrared camera.
1) If there are going to be upgrades to the DAS system that are hardware upgrades, its likely that the US will receive them first, simply by the nature of it being the main producer of the system. Other nations will most likely slowly receive the upgrade as well, of course.
2) The combination of radar, the much larger IR camera on a swivel under the turret, and the DAS create a relatively high definition picture of the target. I am pretty sure theres a demonstration somewhere on youtube, Ill try to find it. But at that point, its up to the pilot to decide. Also disguising military equipment as medical/civilian while its a combatant its a warcrime.
3)No. DAS is a collection of IR cameras. To jam it, you would practically need to do the equivalent of pointing an IR flashlight at the plane, which would be really short range. And to do that, you would also need to find and track the aircraft. And it can also use the radar to detect ground targets.
4) It is not a complex system hardware wise, as it is just IR cameras. It is complex digitally, however. Digital bugs may occur, but fixes can be done quickly, to every single F-35 at once, instantly.
@BoxyTheSpaceDog "why aren't new Russian planes shown in the video,like Su-30Mk2,Su-35.Mig-35?"
Because this video isn't about those.
This F-35 advanse hight technology look awesome and impresive but I hope that the President or Congress dont reduce buget to this full program because then will be a handicap F-35 as was the measure to F-22 Helmet Raptor replacing the Hud display.
cannricky Perez: “ The $2 Trillion 💰🍋JSF-35 promises everything but delivers Little more than more profits to McDonald-Douglas’ War Profiteers?!!!”
Look awesome and impresive, only I hope that the President and Congrees dont cut buget to this full F-35 program because then will be handicap and crap F-35. If some dont know yet, the F-22 Raptor had cuts as Helmet Vision hud meanwhile in 2008 the Typhoon was testing their Helmet Hud in Nellis A Base, Red Flag exercices.
no i hope they pour another 1.5 trillions in it, before calling it a dud. that will teach lockheed to make planes, that actually deliver what they promise, on time.
You forgot two vay firewalls. Like to listen to the commercial for Kaspersky
@atmodom 2:15, that's what happens.
Also, 'flying cow' is an inaccurate description, in the September 2011 issue of Airforces Monthly they had this to say "... in terms of manoeuvrability the F-35 will be cleared to 50° angle of attack, similar to the F/A-18 Hornet, with a full load of munitions inside."
Also, manoeuvrability may not be as important as you think it is, most modern air-to -air engagements tend to be at long range where the F-35's advanced systems make it lethal.
Can I get a job at Northrpgrumman you guys.
@Air2air1 you forgot 2add that the f35 is a nato joint strike fighter program
Sold. id like to buy a dozen, hit me up in the PMs
Do u ship to afrika?
Simple EO-IR, which is neither integrated nor giviging 360 degree coverage, is no compared to EODAS.
Nice!
have you figured out how to eliminate double imaging on the hud, when more than one sensor picks up the same signal? Or are the Pilots still turning it off?
Gunni1972 You trying to prove how much you know? Not impressed
Its just a dot product of forward vector of vector location of helmet vs vector location of hud. If it scores >0.75f, the DAS linear interpolates its opacity from 100% to 0% as it nears 0.90f. Literally every fighter with a HMD does this and has for the last 20 years.
Let your missiles do the turning
Identify the reality on the battlefield
HOLY S*(T !!!! Why didn't we have this when I was flying for the Navy? All I can say is " AWESOME " !!!!!!
this coupled with the 100 kilo laser, nothing could hit it. save the missiles for some thing else! it could take out every ground and air target in a extremely short amount of time. the only nee for missiles are large fortified targets? ( bunkers ect.) tanks ect. can be taken out with laser! missiles would be for well over the horizon targets??
tim mcquearysr There exists no laser currently that could be effective against bunkers or tanks. Especially none that can be airborne. A tank would take ridiculous amounts of time for a laser to have an affect on it.
+scythelord I think he means against SAMs.
Laser might can't
But don't be so idiotic guys u.s had a lot of kinds of weapons on its weaponry
Don't be dumb...
Все эти ваши мультфильмы всего лишь желания. В реальности эти самолёты способны воевать только с противником у которого нет систем ПВО и современных самолётов истребителей! Посмотрите как Израиль не может применить ваши самолёты потом что у Сирии есть системы ПВО...
А все мультфильмы где F35 уничтожает российские С400 это просто фантастика!!!
cowboys ate crazy mushrooms-ковбои ели сумасшедшие грибы
Alright buddy. Stay in your S400 truck while a HARM comes your way without you even knowing...
Too bad your information is hopelessly out of date. The BAE HMD is a backup that only addresses the jitter issues the VSI HMD had with night vision. The BAE HMD is on its way to being cancelled now that VSI has a grip on the jitter issues.
Wow a feeler expert appears hahahaha
Civilian planes could use a limited version of this.
Who is current Aopa President ? DW
This is the reason why the F-35 is so expensive! so high tech for your money to carry! expensive gadgets always better than cheap ones! like cellphones!
i hope it gets so expensive, congress refuses to buy it.
@@Gunni1972 Hah, too late, they signed the contract and the planes are being delivered, world wide in fact!
@@Gunni1972Not only did Congress buy it, but over 1000 units have been made
I believe Northrop Grumman since they are succses build Bomber B-52 Spirit
Not b52 but B2, b52 is boeing
f-35 not only can destroy all target on air and graund-
on earth but also on mars and venus too
jasem adodi u a file🤗
toro khoda nega ham vatanaye ma
and throughout the galaxy as well hahahahahahahahahahahahah
cowboys suck
Hey! They haven't built missiles that can reach QUITE that distance while being portable!
Awesome
Amazing 🤯
I love das so much it’s give me sense
of security
Why advertising other product..lockheed martin.?why gruman
So DAS will make the F-35 better or worst?
+mrwong11989 DAS is the main reason the F-35 is built for the role its designated for.
Homer Simpson What do you mean?
Boeingemployee1989 with das,pilot can detect stealth fighters with own eyes when planes give off heat
Izno Iznogoud, that's BS.
Rafale OSF’s IRST was a disappointment. The OSF-IT omitted the IR channel altogether. Some Rafale F3s supposedly were even delivered without the OSF. OSF-IT has detection range of 85 km on a clear day. OSF-IT is use for identification not for IR tracking
*ODF-IT will be cued by radar, Spectra*, or Link-16.
The twin IR channels present in the Rafale F2's OSF will be absent from the OSF-IT. Otherwise, it would have been necessary to address the obsolescence and performance issues affecting the IR portion of the Rafale F2's OSF that are today entering service. To sum it up, the OSF-IT will make do with the TV sensor. This system will be an improvement over the current one (but without an increase in range, since this would have required changing the focal mechanisms), which can already be cued by radar, Spectra, or Link-16, thus allowing it to detect aircraft at 85km, to separately distinguish the multiple aircraft in a flight at around 40km, and even to detect a formation break before it is seen on radar, which provides an undeniable advantage. Nevertheless, the absence of the dual-channel IR will de facto prevent passive air to air combat at night."
From Technologie & Armement supplement of the June 2007 Air Power:
Does it have i7 processor?
It has PowerPC base CPU instead.
No, its using the 8088 chip set.. much more reliable !!!!
@@wombatlover2796 It's PowerPC with FPGA
Kemampuan Teknologi EO-DAS Pesawat F-35 belum mampu dirancang oleh Tim KFX / IFX. Saya yang sudah mampu merancang Sistem EO-DAS yang setara dengan Sistem F-35 dalam Proyek Pesawat ANFX versi saya.
Uji Terbang ini menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak seluk-beluk Teori Dasar dan Integrasi Sistem dan sinkronisasi perhitungan Mekanika Terbang yang lebih inovatif yang harus dikembangkan sendiri dalam perancangan. Jadi ini sudah bisa saya aplikasikan sejak 12 tahun yang lalu, sekarang makin saya sempurnakan saja.
Tim KFX / IFX belum mampu, masih belajar berkreasi sampai tahun 2024 nanti, masih bodoh mereka. Presiden JOKOWI harus diingatkan tentang pemborosan anggaran pembangunan di Proyek KFX / IFX ini. Periksa kembali Master Plan-nya yang korup itu, ganti anggota Timnya yang masih lambat mikir, makan gaji buta dari negara.
Saya sekarang punya validasi Design Requirement & Objective (DRO) dan data-data Kemampuan Tempur Pesawat ANFX rancangan saya yang sudah bisa dijual tahun 2015 ke Lockheed Martin untuk diintegrasikan dengan assembly Pesawat F-35, atau diproduksi secara tersendiri.
Wah hebat bgt bapak ini sudah berani menandingi capabilities by Lockheed martin. Any avionics dalam f35 saja masih classified. Bapaknya sudah bisa menandingi millions codes super computer integrated f35..... Hebat bgt sampai aku tidak percaya
The shoot back missile has half the range of a shoot forward missile because it is expending extra fuel turning in ways conventional missiles do not, so it would only scare off a pursuer who's lining up for a gun kill. This is why 99% of missile fighting is moving your airplane into a position where the missile you're firing has to do the least amount of turning to hit the enemy (has the best kinematics).
Modern SAM can fire on the move and detect in bands the F-35 isn't stealthy in, so DAS is a bit useless in that respect. Not to mention DAS is something plenty of other aircraft have (Gripen etc), it's not some new invention.
Also DAS and reverse firing missiles can be installed on a WWII prop bomber, if they were so powerful as to make turning useless, why even pay hundreds of millions for a jet airframe?
+Jane Geary F-35 can detect SAM's missile launch can enable F-35 to counter attack. DAS has missile tracking capability.
The Russians has first nuke strike options.
Parts of this system is made by Therma in Denmark 🇩🇰
This technology needs to be deployed at the US-Mexico border.
nice cartoon for "good night kids" ha ha ha - if you're so strong try it-cowboys
Scrap the 35, install DAS on the 22.
Then you yanks will truly have a world beater like the 15/16 was in the 70s/80s.
DUH of course The F-22 already has it too
Er... No it doesn't. It has the MLD
louie55ish which is basically the same thing FACEPALM
+Nicolas Nope
I totally agree -- scrap the F-35 and install the Electro Optical Distributed Aperture System (DAS) on the FA-18E/F Super Hornet. The unfortunate F-35 is a complete lemon, and will, no doubt, go down as one of the greatest failures in aviation history. The F-35 began its development as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) in 1992 -- Yes, 25 years ago!!! Yet Initial Operational Capability (IOC) has only very recently been declared in the USMC and USAF in very corrupt testing schemes. And Full Operational Capability (FOC) has not been attained by any service's F-35s, and won't be for quite some time. That means the F-35 remains not fully combat ready. It still has a laundry list of unresolved significant problems, yet over 200 F-35s have now rolled off the assembly lines. That means that all current, and many future F-35s will need extensive rework. At least the Navy has had the good sense to not embrace the F-35, and to purchase the failed aircraft in very limited numbers, as politically required. It is quite clear that the F-35 will be THE LAST aircraft that will be developed for all three flying branches (Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps), and the F-35 program is nothing short of being an albatross/white elephant, and complete waste, fraud, and abuse to United States' and participating countries' taxpayers.
R&D budget: 421 billion USD
Animation budget: 200 bucks
It's from 2010 you ape
Good fighter
But US may not ship to India as India Has S400 systems too
No. Neither turkey nor india is getting them.
@@casey19660 but Lockeed is started plant withTatas Indian MNC in South India to supply F21=F22 raptor For medium combat
India seems hesitant on the deal
I don’t think so 🤔
I have some doubt that how many dreams come to true in real life
It is a matter of time. The software is under constant development.
Seriously, how many air-to-air combat situations do we even encounter each year? What a huge waste of money.
Buddy. The thing can carry A2A missiles. And also the F-22 still exists, and the only reason there aren't more is Congress being stupid and forgetting price goes down the more something is produced.
มีเอฟ35ไว้ท.อ12ลำพอดีไทยไม่มีดีสำหรับอเมริกาเพราะทหารเผล็ดการเหมือนคอมมืวเมินโลกเสรืทำยิ่งอีกทหารใหญ่
There wasn't a lot of new tech here. This system isn't the only one that can provide over the shoulder shots at the enemy. I think SAAB can even do it with the Gripen.
Plus i noticed one of the other fighter's was a SU27 and another a Euro fighter, so what your saying is no other country will be challenging with anything more than a fourth generation fighter jet in future?
Plus all the SAM's were out in the open, a desert in one scene and a green empty field in another.
I do not think their commander will be in charge for long.
A lot of this technology is old. The Russians created the helmet mounted HUD, the Apache Guardian helicopter has all the sensors, stealth is based around the F-22 and the voice activated stuff is SIRI. I believe the F-35 is failing because there are literally hundreds of different contractors and sub contractors around the world making the parts for these things so there is a lot of room for corruption.
+orlock20 This is a very naïve viewpoint. DAS ist completely different compared to a "basic" HUD. Yes - it all started with an HUD - but it is like saying, that the first IBM PC and a contemporary PC have the same capabilities - and while in theory they are - in reality they aren't!
Your latter part of you analysis isn't an argument either. Yes - some of the delays and cost overruns happened due with it... but the whole program had to be restructured and since then made far better progress... and the F-35 is already fielded and deployed [even not with 100% of their final capabilities].
That's why the NGAD is already being worked on. And besides, I have yet to see a true fifth gen built by the ruskis or chinese.
I worked at Northrop Grumman at biz town I was ceo
The F35 isn't made for dog fights, so what good is this product?
Watch the video again and it will answer your question.
And besides, for pure A2A there's always the beast that is the F-22.
wait f35 lookheed not grummen
wait das northrop not lookheed
The only reason the f-35 will need off boar sight weapons is because it can't dogfight,maybe the U.S should just stick to SAMs
th-cam.com/video/Y4DWX-R8ME8/w-d-xo.html
F-35A vs F-22A vs EF Turn.
th-cam.com/video/k3b-b762QRY/w-d-xo.html
Super Hornet's high AoA+minimum turn radius advantage holding it's own against F-15's high energy turn rate advantage dogfight example
Original source (non-English)
suomenkuvalehti.fi/jutut/kotimaa/suomella-vahvat-ilmavoimat-mutta-kuinka-kauan/
Frisian Flag 2012 exercises in Holland, Finnish F-18Cs gets 100 kills and 6 loses against Eurofighter (Germany, UK), Polish new F-16 and older F-16 planes (Norway, Belgium) and Gripen (Swedish)
nettsteder.regjeringen.no/kampfly/2015/11/20/a-fly-f-35-erfaringer-fra-den-forste-uka/
More F-16 vs F-35 from Norwegian pilot.
I quote
_Overall, flying the F-35 reminds me a bit of flying the F/A-18 Hornet, but with an important difference: It has been fitted with a turbo_
Wing Nut
Futuro hoy en la armada EEUU alucinante el poder armamentista .
@@ciudadmafiosamafiacityarri1859 EEUU sigue siendo el número uno en tecnología y armamento civil y militar incluso se sostiene que tienen una red de naves espaciales en la órbita terrestre
@azotos Why does it have to only be Americans? Every company does the same thing.
Meanwhile chinese:✍✍✍✍
Lol, Its funny to see how Sukhoi and Typhoon are getting busted. But reality may be different. They may have more sophisticated counter measures.
Ratheon is building the das system's for cheaper and five times the performance.
ໃຜກາເຮັດເປັນພໍປານກັນ ສຳຄັນນັກບິນເກັ່ງສຳໃດ
Just a simulator. But in fact that scenario not so easy
+Hendra Djokam it's powered by element 115 tho!
+Matt Gibbs
Holy shit, I nearly choked on my carot I was eating. Nice !
Russia is like "can u rewind that, please?"
China is like "copy that"
Stop the cap. Stop the cap RIGHT NOW, stop the cap.
You are NOT selling me on an IRST with both the raw Agility AND sustained thrust necessary to pull a damn 180 degree turn, and then kill, off a PASSED MERGE.
Has this been installed on this turkey yet?
U.s back down to sell it to Turkey after Turkey bought Russian air deffense.
Your replying to comment posted 6 years ago, lol
@@ermaclenista2259 Turkey's always been on the ruskis side. Only reason they're in NATO is because of their highly strategic position and so no one can touch them.
Wow! I want one! Unfortunately - it rolls to fast - I'd get sick :-(
Aircraft built on aerodynamic principle lose aircraft which use gravity(magnetic electric)principle.Летательные аппараты которые строятся на аэродинамическом принципе проигрывают летательным аппаратам которые используют гравитационный(магнитно электрический)принцип.
+Иван Иванов приведите пример серьезных преимуществ, а то выглядит как чушь какая-то...
Синтез Ядерный истребитель перехватчик Гладиатор.Применения гравитационных(магнитно электрических) технологий позволило создать аналог НЛО. Гравитационные технологии позволяют создавать искусственную невесомость управлять временем(ускорять или замедлять) что позволяет поглотить импульс РЛС быть невидимым в оптическом спектре и Т.Д.Что бы вывести F-35 из строя достаточно на дним пролететь Гладиатору электроника перестанет функционировать.
Иван Иванов нет такого истребителя.
Хватит выдумывать всякую херню?
Синтез Вы правы всё это выдумки.
aimbot ffs ;///
Such a weird design!
Excelente infomaciones
All i've ever seen it do is a simple roll ...! CAN ANYONE SAY DIFFERENT ?
+Andy Croucheaux Vid on youtube of it doing a semi cobra check it out
nice arpeggiated hard-sync
Хороший мультик. Только даже против МиГ 21 у него шансов нет.
Act now and you can get another F35 for free with purchase of the F35 you just pay shipping and handling.
totally underestimate their enemy.. in real combat, u not only have DAS but ur aircraft will blast off in the air.. 🤣🤣🤣
will blast off in the air -- LOL!
And how do you possibly do that?
Hahaha your not paying attention I think..
Your name gave me a bigger laugh than your illogical comment, :D MuhaMAD Naz(r)i ! Got to say that the connetations of the word play was just so perfect.....
If Russian radar can detect the F-35 or jam it's electronics (probably) this aircraft wouldnt stand chance against the SU-35 fighter.
We are relying on a tech superiority that may not exist to level they expect. If at all.
You simply cannot assume that against a modern military. We need aircraft that OUTPERFORM their aircraft. And NOT rely on wishful thinking.
SU-35 doesn't have F-15C's low wing loading.
web.archive.org/web/20170804135017/www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/military/su30mk/lth/
SU-30MK empty weight estimate from OEM
24900 Kg - (2 x 105 Kg + 2 x 253 Kg + 5270 kg) = 18914 kg or 41698 lbs
Select a desired combat range and load SU-30MK with fuel load and calculate the effective wing loading.
Basic wing loading empty weight without factoring forward/rear body and vortex lift factors.
Fuel and weapons load can change with different missions.
F-16C Block 50
Empty Weight: 18,900 lbs
Wing area: 300 ft²
Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet.
Thrust weight ratio: 1.51 : 1
F-18E
Empty Weight: 31,500 lbs
Wing area: 500 ft²
Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. (minimum turn radius dogfighter)
Thrust weight ratio: 1.40 : 1
SU-30MK
Empty Weight: 41,698 lbs
Wing area: 667 ft²
Wing loading: 62.51 lbs/ sq feet.
Thrust weight ratio: 1.33 : 1
F-35A
Empty weight: 28,999 lbs (Year 2015).
Wing area: 460 ft²
Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet.
Thrust weight ratio: 1.48 : 1
SU-35
www.flightjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SUKHOI.pdf
Empty Weight: 40,565 lbs (no reference)
Wing area: 667 ft²
Wing loading: 60.82 lbs/ sq feet.
Thrust weight ratio: 1.42 : 1 (29000 lbf each engine)
F-15C
Empty Weight: 28,000 lbs
Wing area: 608 ft²
Wing loading: 46 lbs/ sq feet.
Thrust weight ratio: 1.70 : 1 (energy dogfighter)
F-22A
Empty Weight: 43,340 lb
Wing area: 840 ft²
Wing loading: 51.59 lbs/ sq feet.
Thrust weight ratio: 1.71 : 1 (energy dogfighter)
F-35A with Option Block 1 engine upgrade
Empty weight: 28,999 lb (Year 2015).
Wing area: 460 ft²
Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet.
Thrust weight ratio: 1.57 : 1 ( 6 percent thrust upgrade)
Thrust weight ratio: 1.63 : 1 (10 percent thrust upgrade)
Do you really think u.s let that happen ?
Of course they already had an answer for that ...
They think advance and faster than you do..
Wow😮😮😍🇺🇸
Best number one, s 400.
*D A S*
2:28 stopped to watch more
Great reference for false advertising.
I feel sorry for Russia's S400 S500 systems LOL
if you're so strong try it-cowboys
@@giko2556 Oh I'd LOVE to fly an F-35, let alone getting to shoot something with it!
Funny how enemy's AA systems aren't even deployed anymore by any potential future threat F-35 would need to deal with,lol.Where's S-400 or future 500,Panzir-S1,Tor-M2,Buk-M2 and others,lol.Current SAM systems don't need to hide when they see this plane longer before it ever sees them ,lol.Also why aren't new Russian planes shown in the video,like Su-30Mk2,Su-35.Mig-35?Video shows those planes unable to engage F-35 from long distances,lol even though their radars see it almost 300-400km away.
China takes notice
BÁN. CHO. TAWAI...??...SÁNG. MẮT. OK.......
10 yrs ago and barely operational
I thought the F35 wasn't supposed to dogfight?
Basic wing loading via empty weight.
F-35A
Empty weight: 28,999 lb (Year 2015).
Wing area: 460 ft²
Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet.
F-16C Block 52
Wing area: 300 ft²
Empty weight: 18,900 lb
Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet.
F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C.
F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C.
F-35A's 43000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28600 lbf.
There's a near straight 1.5X scaling between F16C Block 52 to F-35A.