Flew round trip from Detroit to Tokyo recently on this type. A real pleasure, the cabin is amazingly quiet. It was as comfortable as a 13 hour flight can be.
You’re lucky that Detroit is a Delta base and already have their A350s. I fly out of SFO which is United territory and they won’t get their A350s till 2027. At least United is getting SOME A350s,,, unlike American who cancelled their order
Nice plane, a bit harder than A320 neo. But some things are easier like having buttons for numbers at the radious. I really hope that it will be available from the start in MSFS 2024, really wanna try it.
Wow, now I can get a job as a pilot after watching this vid. I'm applying to American Airlines and Delta tomorrow. If they don't take me, I know Spirit will. 😊👍
BOSpilot do you know anything about it? Like what’s being changed and when it’s releasing. I’m just fed up of having no SID/STARs and no weight/fuel initialise page
Thomas Mortimore Yeah, the devs said there will be SID/STAR support and there will also be ToD and ToC indications. In order to get the ToC and ToD indications, you need to fill the FUEL&LOAD page, so yes, that will be updated
I thought Boeing aircraft were complicated but nothing even close to the AB-350. By the time the video was over , I was brain dead from all of the functions that were necessary to configure the aircraft prior to departure and arrival. This video is totally AMAZING! Since , Airbus aircraft are operated by onboard computers, I can understand the complexity!!!!!!!
When you start to throw in other factors like engineering issues, weather, fatigue and human factors like attitudes and moods you can see how this can be a much tougher job than people appreciate, particularly for the left seat but for reasons that are not always perceptible in videos like this
ı am a old 737 guy and now training for a350 and ı already missed american mentality , keep it as simple as stupid :((( these days ı am like Clint Eastwood as in the scene Fire Fox. '' I must think in Russian.........
As you see by these two airmen, this routine and ability to provide the details without referring to cue cards, checklist, etc., means that it becomes rote. However, get away from it for a month and you'll have to retrain your brain to become accustom to the flow.
Excelent video. But idk I feel like I still prefer the a320 panel. Is good that technology bring to us a lots of practically, but the a320 is so pretty 💙
@JSL SAA if possible do another video on takeoff, cruise and landing in details as in this one. Great video and insight, not your everyday thing to see . Thanks
Can you imagine if you took this plane and cockpit and landed at KJFK In July 1960 then give all the pilots a tour of this thing? I mean they would think you were some super advanced being with alien technology. Compared to the 1960 707 cockpit.
Honestly the UI in the A350 needs to be more organized. The buttons on the screen seems to be scattered in random locations, and some color coding would be nice too. The chip should be updated in the future cuz its a bit laggy when zooming in and out of the nav screen.
I agree, the UI needs a huge overhaul. Everything needs to be big and bold and every screen should be a touch screen. The menus seem clunky and the hardware slow.
@@CyberSystemOverload Why should they be touchscreen? You're just asking for dirty fingerprints all over it. And then how do you manage during turbulence?
@@tomstravels520 Those issues have long since been addressed. Look at Symmetry flight deck that Gulfstream is using. 10 touchscreens :-) Even the overhead is all touchscreen: th-cam.com/video/PnLe4Rm7QzY/w-d-xo.html
@@CyberSystemOverload that video doesn’t explain how they’ve been addressed. I’d like to know what happens if the screen freezes or power is lost to that screen of controls or if a severe electrical failure occurs. Then how do you activate those systems controlled by touchscreen. Also private jets are massively different from commercial passenger jets. The UI of the A350 is probably the best around. PFD is for flying the plane, ND is for navigating, central displays are for managing aircraft systems, lower central displays are managing the flight and the OIS is for extra assistance for displaying maps and showing aircraft maintenance data etc. The newer A350 do actually have touchscreen lower displays and OIS but they’re for pilot preference who can still use the mouse and keyboard or trackball if they want. If you’re not a commercial pilot you can’t really say “oh it looks bad and needs sorting out” because you don’t use it anyway. Also this plane was designed in late 2000’s and likely using chips from that era as they can’t keep adding new ones all the time as they have to be throughly tested. The chip powering the EFB on the 787 is supposedly from late 90’s
That's a great job Thanks a lot However at 32 20 shows ECAM CG to enter TO PERF THS BOX That is not correct, LS CG entry should be done Yes it looks weird , because at A 330, we used to rely on and enter ECAM CG rather than Load sheet CG But here A 350, the F/CTL PITCH TRIM/FMS/CG DISAGREE check logic is a little bit different than A 330 So we should enter LS CG
But the CG they used off the ECAM should be the same as the LS anyway shouldn’t it? You enter the initial figures in the FUEL and LOAD page for ZFW, ZFWCG and Block fuel and that will give you the CG of the aircraft which should match the loadsheet? The result they got off the ECAM is just what they entered in the FUEL page as the aircraft can’t calculate its own weight and CG until at least in the air
@@henrysakul625 I do. Some companies have the pilots having temp control. In this case, the aircraft was clearly ex engineering which would mean the engineers had put the controls where they needed them.
Excellent. I found out that at 12:12 engine out is 7058ft, but would like to know what typical values are entered in the INIT page, under T.O tab for 'THR RED' and 'ACCEL'. Thanks so much.
Hi Ron. It depends on the runway noise abatement instructions. 7058' is 1500' agl in Johannesburg. The Airbus engines are so quiet that we normally use 1500' agl for THR RED and for ACCEL.
The meters are connected directly to the battery. All you’re pressing when you push the battery buttons is the switch to connect them to the power supply
Thanks, always align the ADIRS 1 then 2 then 3, this helps with muscle memory of the odd switch positions if you ever have to find the correct switch during an emergency.
@@hodb3906 Having flown both Airbus and Boeing, I think I'm a bit more qualified to comment on this snowflake ;) And no, none of us are flying right now in real life cause there's this thing called a pandemic going on, that's why we're here watching this crap 🤣
@@hodb3906 back to your mother's basement and stop getting so offended over everything 🤣 I'm sorry that my professional opinion has hurt you, but I don't even understand what part of it offends you. Literally all I said was how incredibly simple this thing is to fly, because it is!
Rey Han my guess is that they’ve been senior if they are on an airlines TH-cam especially such a big airlines TH-cam so they’ve probably memorized all abbreviations, then they just do everything that they must fill in, order probably doesn’t matter
0:02 Shouldn't that be either "all liability is" or "all liabilities are?" 25:38 I'm surprised you don't look into why the plane made the switch back to TOGA.
I feel like Airbus went two steps back with all that modern stuff. Way too much workload for the pilots. And what's with all that repetitive steps? Why can't the EFB synchronise with the MCDU or vice versa?
Very suboptimal clumsy interface still. It should be one big display, virtually no buttons. The legacy autopilot bar at the top should never have been there. The screen should be much closer to the pilot and there should be no center console. It could be so vastly much cleaner and nicer. That is painful to look at for a thinking person.
No. This is superior. A single interface would be too cluttered. There’s also no redundancy with a single display. You really don’t know what you’re talking about
@@peteconrad2077 hehe ye of little faith. Go to 11:45 and look at the dash. In a zero visibility situation, would you rather fly by this dash or by a 40inch microsoft flightsim display? try to realize that MSFS is synthetic vision avionics. Which is clearer, which is more enabling. And which is absolute garbage. As for redundancy, one big display per pilot and a little 3rd unit stowed away out of sight but realistically if you have lost both units you have probably lost the electronics that control the plane anyway. It's a good general lesson to never mindlessly defend status quo. Don't be so devoted to the current situation that you praise it without insight. I assure you, airline cockpit design is absolute garbage.
@@DanFrederiksen I’m not mindlessly defending anything. I have a masters in aeronautical engineering, fly the A350 and can tell you that you are taking utter bilge.
@@peteconrad2077 hehe, you are a bus driver. I am a polymath genius, father of deep learning, smartest man in the world with wisdom to match. When you are done being offended, think about the comparison I offered you. Which is the more informative clear display, the A350 dash or the MS flight sim view. One is pleasant to fly by, the other is a runway show for emperor's new robes. You just never questioned it. Next time you sit down in the cockpit, look at it and realize that it belongs in a russian plane from the 1960s. The first car with an engine looked like a horse drawn carriage, just without the horses. That's a failure of intelligent design. Airliner cockpits are similarly thoughtless design by past convention.
@@DanFrederiksen you are neither a polymath nor that bright and certainly ignorant of the priorities for operating an aircraft. Having used both displays extensively and having considerable expertise in this matter I can tell you that the Airbus design is superior every way. Better redundancy Better segregation Better ergonomics More information with intelligent display showing what’s needed for the phase of flight. In fact, only a know nothing could imagine the MS display superior. Thank you for self identifying.
so unnecessary complex and long. 787 is so much easier and pilot friendly. although it might be just this video. you start daylight it's night now and still somewhere with preflight preparations...
Some quick jumps:
20:15 start entering flight plan
20:50 company route
22:20 IRS align
22:27 departures
23:05 radio navaids
23:55 weight and balance and fuel
25:05 takeoff performance
27:00 arrival
27:35 scroll through flight plan
27:55 alternate departure
28:21 alternate scroll through
28:30 alternate arrival
29:00 delete wpts / disco
29:30 sec1/2/3 copy from active
30:00 sec1 alternate
31:05 airport navigation function (ANF) -> airport diagram
32:50 final load sheet arrives, check performance
34:20 electronic checklists
35:05 taxi cam
Thanks for this...JetPackJan
You know that the check list is to loooong when day turn into night :P
Everyone knows .
Lol
Lol!🤯
I’m a PPL currently doing my IFR training. This is my favorite airliner, hope I can be inside the cockpit someday!!
It might happen sooner than you think.
@@ZwartkopFilmkunde Thank you!
This is literal gold
Yes this is aviation porn
Very rare do you see this level of detail. Excellent!!!
@eternal footman maybe
Not literal... but yes agreed
Fantastic - SAA pilot's are great - worlds best aircraft
Flew round trip from Detroit to Tokyo recently on this type. A real pleasure, the cabin is amazingly quiet. It was as comfortable as a 13 hour flight can be.
You’re lucky that Detroit is a Delta base and already have their A350s. I fly out of SFO which is United territory and they won’t get their A350s till 2027. At least United is getting SOME A350s,,, unlike American who cancelled their order
Euro tech best tech 😎
This is what I needed! I can use tutorial to start my plane now! Thanks.
Thanks guys! I am in training now on this amazing jet. Your video actually helped me quite a bit!
Brilliant. Springbok heavy. Safe flying ✈ this beauty.
I’ve flown only a few times, don’t plan on working with aircrafts or being a pilot but here I am, completely entertained 😂
Nice Dion and Mark 💪🏻🐫
Kapt Wielletjies
Perfect. Thank you for this. Former SAA ground crew at KATL.
Thanks. Miss Atlanta (Wonderful people) , haven't been there since 2004. Will hopefully be back again soon - Sam Loots
@@JSLSAA Very well. Philippa, Jennifer, Ewa, Smruti and myself would have Proudly served you then. All the very best ahead and much success!
Brilliant tutorial for us avgeeks, thanks SAA!
cool vid, this Airbus was leased from Air Mauritius
This has been extremely helpful. Thank you!!
Nice plane, a bit harder than A320 neo. But some things are easier like having buttons for numbers at the radious. I really hope that it will be available from the start in MSFS 2024, really wanna try it.
Such a good quality video, absolutely loved it and the pilots seem so kind and patient
Loved every second of it thank you ♥️
So happy that I have discovered this channel!!
To bad there's no content on it.
Wow, now I can get a job as a pilot after watching this vid. I'm applying to American Airlines and Delta tomorrow. If they don't take me, I know Spirit will. 😊👍
How did that go?
Except Spirit dont have A350's in their fleet... 🤣🤣
Watching this to get ready for the new FF A350 update!
BOSpilot do you know anything about it? Like what’s being changed and when it’s releasing. I’m just fed up of having no SID/STARs and no weight/fuel initialise page
Thomas Mortimore Yeah, the devs said there will be SID/STAR support and there will also be ToD and ToC indications. In order to get the ToC and ToD indications, you need to fill the FUEL&LOAD page, so yes, that will be updated
@@gt55115 and holding too!
foolguy6 Yep, also that!
Yeah there's no way it'll be anything as detailed as this 😂
Thank you.
Something that I’m interested in is how the FMC/MCDU works and all the pages included. The A350 really is a beautiful aircraft
Awesome video love it! More please!
What a machine.. Nice
Wow I cant believe that there are so many monitors replacing those traditional instruments 😲
And there I was thinking you just turn the ignition key and release the handbrakes. BTW, great video.
😂😂😂
Excellent video !!! Thanks for that !
The most advanced Airbus I have ever seen.
I thought Boeing aircraft were complicated but nothing even close to the AB-350. By the time the video was over , I was brain dead from all of the functions that were necessary to configure the aircraft prior to departure and arrival. This video is totally AMAZING! Since , Airbus aircraft are operated by onboard computers, I can understand the complexity!!!!!!!
When you start to throw in other factors like engineering issues, weather, fatigue and human factors like attitudes and moods you can see how this can be a much tougher job than people appreciate, particularly for the left seat but for reasons that are not always perceptible in videos like this
ı am a old 737 guy and now training for a350 and ı already missed american mentality , keep it as simple as stupid :((( these days ı am like Clint Eastwood as in the scene Fire Fox. '' I must think in Russian.........
As you see by these two airmen, this routine and ability to provide the details without referring to cue cards, checklist, etc., means that it becomes rote. However, get away from it for a month and you'll have to retrain your brain to become accustom to the flow.
I am learning so much as an 11 year old
Excelent video. But idk I feel like I still prefer the a320 panel. Is good that technology bring to us a lots of practically, but the a320 is so pretty 💙
THE AIRBUS A350 VERY NICE 🥳
What a treasure.
That was very useful guys thank you.
Thx Captains, it is very helpfull👍
Happy to help
This is gold.
Great stuff hope to see more video especially non normal procedure on the 350 from SAA training dept
Thanks!!
now a350 has touch screens
huh? where?
rkan2 the newer displays installed on A350 (not this one) have touchscreen displays.
th-cam.com/video/Xyctm0as-Eg/w-d-xo.html
I bet the pilots don't play candy crush though. just joking
Only outer and lower displays are touchscreen for EFB applications
Airbus made a great A/C in the A350 .
WOW! thanks!!
Aren't you supposed to check if the landing gear is down before you get in the cockpit?
@JSL SAA if possible do another video on takeoff, cruise and landing in details as in this one.
Great video and insight, not your everyday thing to see .
Thanks
th-cam.com/video/jk-WClye4bw/w-d-xo.html
Fantastic! Thanks for sharing.
Well done Guys ,Super.
Can you imagine if you took this plane and cockpit and landed at KJFK In July 1960 then give all the pilots a tour of this thing? I mean they would think you were some super advanced being with alien technology. Compared to the 1960 707 cockpit.
Why did you play the music? Did you think we'd be bored without it?
Is that aircraft parked in the garden or the car park?
Looooovely video......dig this!...
ehi can you do a simulation of rapid decompression and hard landing please!
And just how would they go about doing that? You paying for the fuel?
@@gryper1690 u know that that use simulators right XD
Honestly the UI in the A350 needs to be more organized. The buttons on the screen seems to be scattered in random locations, and some color coding would be nice too. The chip should be updated in the future cuz its a bit laggy when zooming in and out of the nav screen.
I agree, the UI needs a huge overhaul. Everything needs to be big and bold and every screen should be a touch screen. The menus seem clunky and the hardware slow.
@@CyberSystemOverload yeah agree. Hope they do a software/hardware upgrade in the future.
@@CyberSystemOverload Why should they be touchscreen? You're just asking for dirty fingerprints all over it. And then how do you manage during turbulence?
@@tomstravels520 Those issues have long since been addressed. Look at Symmetry flight deck that Gulfstream is using. 10 touchscreens :-)
Even the overhead is all touchscreen:
th-cam.com/video/PnLe4Rm7QzY/w-d-xo.html
@@CyberSystemOverload that video doesn’t explain how they’ve been addressed. I’d like to know what happens if the screen freezes or power is lost to that screen of controls or if a severe electrical failure occurs. Then how do you activate those systems controlled by touchscreen. Also private jets are massively different from commercial passenger jets.
The UI of the A350 is probably the best around. PFD is for flying the plane, ND is for navigating, central displays are for managing aircraft systems, lower central displays are managing the flight and the OIS is for extra assistance for displaying maps and showing aircraft maintenance data etc. The newer A350 do actually have touchscreen lower displays and OIS but they’re for pilot preference who can still use the mouse and keyboard or trackball if they want. If you’re not a commercial pilot you can’t really say “oh it looks bad and needs sorting out” because you don’t use it anyway.
Also this plane was designed in late 2000’s and likely using chips from that era as they can’t keep adding new ones all the time as they have to be throughly tested. The chip powering the EFB on the 787 is supposedly from late 90’s
this is a LOT harder than I thought
That's a great job Thanks a lot However at 32 20 shows ECAM CG to enter TO PERF THS BOX That is not correct, LS CG entry should be done Yes it looks weird , because at A 330, we used to rely on and enter ECAM CG rather than Load sheet CG But here A 350, the F/CTL PITCH TRIM/FMS/CG DISAGREE check logic is a little bit different than A 330 So we should enter LS CG
But the CG they used off the ECAM should be the same as the LS anyway shouldn’t it? You enter the initial figures in the FUEL and LOAD page for ZFW, ZFWCG and Block fuel and that will give you the CG of the aircraft which should match the loadsheet? The result they got off the ECAM is just what they entered in the FUEL page as the aircraft can’t calculate its own weight and CG until at least in the air
That’s the airbus standard, but operators can vary an SOP for cross fleet standardisation or to comply with operational policy.
would have been a good video if there's no loud background addition randomly
CLEANER AUDIO VERSION AVAILABLE, ENJOY: th-cam.com/video/G2umUQ6s40E/w-d-xo.html
I see you can easily launch steam on the EFB from the top
Why is the gear Lever covered?
I think it's because it was in storage at this point so they didn't want the lever being accidently pushed
One day we will have this beauty fly in warp speed.
Not sure if you’ll see this 3 years later but if you do. Are any of the screens touchscreen?
Not sure if this one is but some of the screens in newer variants are
I would like to be a pilot but put off by the high cost of flight training. Can someone give me advice? I’m in the UK
wow theres mouse onfms now?
Where are the A350 manuals? Impossible to find.
Is it rtx 4090 at 24gb i914900k at 5.ghz? Run msfs in a350?
Nice video but the "music" that comes on now and then is totally unnecessary and very distracting.
Cabin Temp selector should be turn all the way down to Purser Select position.. That one showed MAX COLD Temp selected Captain..
Depends on company policy.
@@peteconrad2077 well then the purser can't adjust the temp in cabin for passenger and let them freezing??...okay Sir...if you say so... LOL
@@henrysakul625 I do. Some companies have the pilots having temp control. In this case, the aircraft was clearly ex engineering which would mean the engineers had put the controls where they needed them.
Excellent. I found out that at 12:12 engine out is 7058ft, but would like to know what typical values are entered in the INIT page, under T.O tab for 'THR RED' and 'ACCEL'. Thanks so much.
Hi Ron. It depends on the runway noise abatement instructions. 7058' is 1500' agl in Johannesburg. The Airbus engines are so quiet that we normally use 1500' agl for THR RED and for ACCEL.
@@JSLSAA Okay thanks!
@@JSLSAA Oh .. I have another question. Can you put fix rings around a waypoint or runway in the 350?
With engine out it is a minimum value anyway. You don’t accelerate until you’ve secured the engine
Can u do a a320/21 start or is it almost the same
SAA has an A350?
Oh yes. The A350-900 are going to replace the A340-600 on the joburg to New York route.
They are borrowed
That keyboard is sexy workstation
"Check that the landing gear lever is down."
You know that someone in the past screwed up if that had to be included.
Gold
How do you get a battery voltage reading if the batteries are off? Dont they have to be on to display anything?
The meters are connected directly to the battery. All you’re pressing when you push the battery buttons is the switch to connect them to the power supply
Her görüntüye yorum olmaz 19:39
ADIRU alignment is #1, #3 and #2
Thanks, always align the ADIRS 1 then 2 then 3, this helps with muscle memory of the odd switch positions if you ever have to find the correct switch during an emergency.
boeing 787 simmers are sweating on how complicated this is.
Airbus is easy as it gets, literally just two to three buttons and this thing is up and running! Video is just unnecessarily long...
@@HDTokyoAviation
yeah right, armchair pilot. That's why you and me are watching these videos and these guys actually fly the aircraft in real life.
@@hodb3906 Having flown both Airbus and Boeing, I think I'm a bit more qualified to comment on this snowflake ;) And no, none of us are flying right now in real life cause there's this thing called a pandemic going on, that's why we're here watching this crap 🤣
@@HDTokyoAviation Yeah. On P3D or as a passenger? Or neither? Careful who you are calling a snowflake here.
@@hodb3906 back to your mother's basement and stop getting so offended over everything 🤣 I'm sorry that my professional opinion has hurt you, but I don't even understand what part of it offends you. Literally all I said was how incredibly simple this thing is to fly, because it is!
This is too complicated. Taxi driver would have already taken off and made a few illegal stops by now
That's why taxy drivers don't fly planes!
i bet ur just jealous HAHA
Why is the landing gear lever locked?
For nobody to steal it 😁
vayalobo 😂😂😂😂
Just press ctrl + E
with such checking i dont think crashing is possible
I mean its essentially a flying computer these days..... gone are the days of manually spinning prop blades to get the engines going 🤣
BOEING WILL NEVER REACH THIS LEVEL OF SIMPLENESS AND ADVANCEMENT
"Full" cockpit preparation should start from cold and dark.
Not necessarily. It’s unusual for most airlines these days to leave an aircraft cold and dark.
The first step should be for the pilots to stow their coffee away from the center pedistal
Great video but the SA accent is so Grating. Sorry.
pretty sad SAA no longer has these planes
I honestly hope that those computers are not Windows based 😬
Great video, thanks for sharing !
why would it be windows based?how dumb can you be?
If you mean the EFBs, they ARE nothing more than Windows laptops in a docking station.
@@zd141 ...and you, obviously, didn't get the irony of my comment. Cheers😉
Align the IRS
They are aligned.
AUX...Good...tac..YOU..OK.
Looks like hard to prepare the flightplan
Rey Han my guess is that they’ve been senior if they are on an airlines TH-cam especially such a big airlines TH-cam so they’ve probably memorized all abbreviations, then they just do everything that they must fill in, order probably doesn’t matter
It doesn't look any harder than on an a320, just more room on the screen and quicker access.
Items like the arrival or departure look pretty standard.
so thats why no one has stole a plane lol
SAA a350💀
SAA323
is this real its look its a simualtor
0:02 Shouldn't that be either "all liability is" or "all liabilities are?"
25:38 I'm surprised you don't look into why the plane made the switch back to TOGA.
They may just have done this setup for demonstration purposes and therefore didn't really care that much...
Too bad for the background noise. Hard to understand the vice.
CLEANER AUDIO VERSION AVAILABLE, ENJOY: th-cam.com/video/G2umUQ6s40E/w-d-xo.html
I feel like Airbus went two steps back with all that modern stuff. Way too much workload for the pilots.
And what's with all that repetitive steps? Why can't the EFB synchronise with the MCDU or vice versa?
Workload actually was never lower than it is now. To your question: EFB and MCDU aren’t physically connected for safety reasons.
Because if you make a mistake in one place you can catch it on the next place
Traduci in italiano tutti i commenti
Brand new a350 for a bankrupt airline
paul Parker ikr
Why not the Boeing 787 dream liner ?
Aec Vet because SAA don’t operate them
I thought to start an airplane u just need a key no u need 35 mins
Very suboptimal clumsy interface still. It should be one big display, virtually no buttons. The legacy autopilot bar at the top should never have been there. The screen should be much closer to the pilot and there should be no center console. It could be so vastly much cleaner and nicer. That is painful to look at for a thinking person.
No. This is superior. A single interface would be too cluttered. There’s also no redundancy with a single display. You really don’t know what you’re talking about
@@peteconrad2077 hehe ye of little faith. Go to 11:45 and look at the dash. In a zero visibility situation, would you rather fly by this dash or by a 40inch microsoft flightsim display? try to realize that MSFS is synthetic vision avionics. Which is clearer, which is more enabling. And which is absolute garbage.
As for redundancy, one big display per pilot and a little 3rd unit stowed away out of sight but realistically if you have lost both units you have probably lost the electronics that control the plane anyway.
It's a good general lesson to never mindlessly defend status quo. Don't be so devoted to the current situation that you praise it without insight. I assure you, airline cockpit design is absolute garbage.
@@DanFrederiksen I’m not mindlessly defending anything. I have a masters in aeronautical engineering, fly the A350 and can tell you that you are taking utter bilge.
@@peteconrad2077 hehe, you are a bus driver. I am a polymath genius, father of deep learning, smartest man in the world with wisdom to match. When you are done being offended, think about the comparison I offered you. Which is the more informative clear display, the A350 dash or the MS flight sim view. One is pleasant to fly by, the other is a runway show for emperor's new robes.
You just never questioned it. Next time you sit down in the cockpit, look at it and realize that it belongs in a russian plane from the 1960s.
The first car with an engine looked like a horse drawn carriage, just without the horses. That's a failure of intelligent design. Airliner cockpits are similarly thoughtless design by past convention.
@@DanFrederiksen you are neither a polymath nor that bright and certainly ignorant of the priorities for operating an aircraft.
Having used both displays extensively and having considerable expertise in this matter I can tell you that the Airbus design is superior every way.
Better redundancy
Better segregation
Better ergonomics
More information with intelligent display showing what’s needed for the phase of flight.
In fact, only a know nothing could imagine the MS display superior. Thank you for self identifying.
FAOR TO FACT
so unnecessary complex and long. 787 is so much easier and pilot friendly. although it might be just this video. you start daylight it's night now and still somewhere with preflight preparations...
To be fair I've seen the 787 power up from cold and dark without ground power....it takes forever