Breaking Down EVERY ONE of 40k's Core Rules Changes in the June 2024 Update | Ridiculous 40k Rules

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
  • #Warhammer40k
    More TacticalTortoise: linktr.ee/tact...
    Download the docs yourself: www.warhammer-...

ความคิดเห็น • 58

  • @johnj.spurgin7037
    @johnj.spurgin7037 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Potentially controversial take: I like the change to Vect, especially on the Callidus. It makes using a Callidus MUCH more delicate, but the fact that they have an uppy-downy makes them almost uniquely good at slipping into the backfield to use it on backline targets, where MOST bearers of such an ability cannot effectively so that, at least have a hard time doing so.

    • @einrauser6103
      @einrauser6103 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agree, these changes make me consider using one for the first time in a while.

  • @jasonr2727
    @jasonr2727 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    So does someone that has a feel no pain against mortal wounds, does that apply to devastating wounds as well since devastating wounds convert to mortal wounds?

    • @marauder340
      @marauder340 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      They do

    • @Chloe34876
      @Chloe34876 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      And now, it applies to mortal wounds from hazardous checks as well.

  • @0AbsolutZero0
    @0AbsolutZero0 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Aint no way you did that in only 25 minutes

    • @TheNarwhal85
      @TheNarwhal85 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He did that in 25 minutes and 38 seconds.

  • @laszlopolyak4353
    @laszlopolyak4353 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder how you implement this from the faq:
    Q: If a unit from your army has a rule that allows it to be the target of a Stratagem, even if that Stratagem has already been used by you earlier that phase, what happens if you have not used that Stratagem yet that phase? Can you use that Stratagem atain later in the phase as a result?
    A: No, unless that later usage of that Stratagem also targets a unit with such an ability.
    I think this isin total controversy with the main rule which says you can only dbl use those abilities, which dedicatedly naming an actual stratagem, while this question is asking for the general captain / chaos lord (or tsons cabal dbl) ability, and the answer tells that sure, if both unit has the same ability. This actual faq would mean that two lord still can dbl up the same strat, and is also a controversy of the main rule.

  • @Chloe34876
    @Chloe34876 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting to note that the Scout Sentinel ability to negate the -1 to hit penalty is useless for the Guard's Vehicle-based artillery that naturally hits on a 3+

    • @florianpal9633
      @florianpal9633 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And what guard artillery piece hits on 3s naturally?

  • @Khorzho
    @Khorzho 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'm just wondering when the community is going to revolt wholesale.

    • @spacemanx9595
      @spacemanx9595 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol why? This only affects tourney players lol

    • @Khorzho
      @Khorzho 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@spacemanx9595 Rules changes like this affect everyone. Say your bud comes over to play? What if he hasn't read these? What if you meet someone new at the hobby store and justs want a friendly game? Now his $70 book is invalid in major parts. I play Chaos, but rules chaos doesn't make a good game. It's crap.

    • @way9689
      @way9689 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Khorzhowhy is your rule book invalid? These changes are only for matched play. If your buddy is coming over for a friendly game, just play with the rules and points you have. If you’re competitive then this is a matter of fact you need to grow up and accept. This kind of change comes along once every six months. That is an eternity in competitive play. Casual play can completely ignore this aspect of the game.

    • @Duppyman695
      @Duppyman695 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I wish the community would but sadly to many brainwashed fools who think making changes to the changes and then correcting the corrections then making changes to the corrections is a good thing and not just low intelligence of the rules writers!

  • @Paranormal-Stupidity
    @Paranormal-Stupidity 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great rundown of the changes. I feel like the game is starting to get overcomplicated again. I know people like to hate on it, but I had the most fun in 8th edition.

  • @Infections95
    @Infections95 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    And again we need 4 books, printed out FAQ's. Rewritten cards for all armies, GW is a joke.

    • @Jarofsalsa954
      @Jarofsalsa954 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If they just did digital codex's.... None of this would be a problem

    • @markhohenbrink5230
      @markhohenbrink5230 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Which books do you need outside of the codex and core rule book? And I dont think every army had datasheet updates.

    • @way9689
      @way9689 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wahapedia + free version of app have everything you need to play.

    • @Infections95
      @Infections95 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@markhohenbrink5230 its sarcasm but its going that way. Pretty much what happens when 10th drops as a beta test... Sick of wasting money on stuff that incorrect less than 6m later

    • @Duppyman695
      @Duppyman695 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Infections95 Imagine writing rules then correcting them and then needing to correct the corrections, I would feel so stupid.... I think 40k rules writers need to go back to school or take night classes or something!

  • @bvshmaster6990
    @bvshmaster6990 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I wish they increased the Repulsor Executioner to 7 guys. That would actually make it worth 220 points

    • @robouteguilliman6662
      @robouteguilliman6662 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I wish they reduced the transport capacity of the repulsor to 3 models and made it 400 points.

    • @bvshmaster6990
      @bvshmaster6990 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@robouteguilliman6662what a stupid thing to say

    • @robouteguilliman6662
      @robouteguilliman6662 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bvshmaster6990 And you fell for it like my grandma in the shower

    • @Maadcapminis
      @Maadcapminis 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I run Blood Angels, I love that tank. I use 2 they're like 80% of my shooting phase. I sometimes forget they also are a transport.
      That's what the land raider and rhino are for.

    • @marauder340
      @marauder340 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      On that note, the LR Crusader still doesn't fit 6 centurions in it lol but yay for -10 points, I guess.

  • @nurglematthew893
    @nurglematthew893 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Y'all, 40k wildin' out, GG, 🐢

  • @envirobloomtv7363
    @envirobloomtv7363 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hazzard change effects units like Obliterators shooting into Vashtorr to not be destroyed essentially loosing 5wound model on a 1

  • @Wes-xk6hl
    @Wes-xk6hl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Im sure there are quite a lot of ppl afraid to play at their local store because its a virtual guarantee that ur going to have to explain to someone why their rulebook or codex is useless and theyre trying to play wrong or a wrong army size etc

    • @fenixtoss2506
      @fenixtoss2506 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yea all these big and frequent changes forces people into the app....sucks

  • @glinek92
    @glinek92 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please if youn want Have People from not eanglish language - talk 15% slower

  • @zaprowsdower923
    @zaprowsdower923 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for summarizing these changes so efficiently!

  • @Swordsmansmith87
    @Swordsmansmith87 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, does the ruins and visibility clarification allow you to shoot wings and swords still or no?

  • @Waaagghhh
    @Waaagghhh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great recap !!!

  • @runeh3022
    @runeh3022 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A quick question that I'm curious if anyone has seen clarified somewhere: The CSM Raiders detachment, there is an Enhancement called "Mark of the Hound", which grants the bearer and his unit the Scout ability. I've seen many youtubers that say one can deploy them inside a dedicated transport (Rhino) and then scout the Rhino, but some also say that due since all character abilities are removed when one enter a vehicle, this is not the case. Has anyone seen an official ruling on this somewhere?

    • @AdeptusTacticus
      @AdeptusTacticus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The entire unit inside the rhino has to have the ability. For example, you can’t have 2 legionnaire units and only one with mark of the hound inside the rhino for the scout move.

    • @runeh3022
      @runeh3022 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AdeptusTacticus that I get, but the question is if the character's ability to extend Scout to the unit is removed as he's technically not "on the table" while in a Rhino. It's that sort of sequence that is unclear.

    • @markhohenbrink5230
      @markhohenbrink5230 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@runeh3022 I'm pretty sure this counts as a persistent ability so you can scout move the unit, it should be under that im the rules document

    • @runeh3022
      @runeh3022 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@markhohenbrink5230 persistent abilities. ok. I'l look into it. tnx :-)

  • @johnmossfordmacgregor973
    @johnmossfordmacgregor973 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New Lord of Deceit (LOD) aura has raised some questions regarding are Stratagems played in the aura or when a unit is in reserve
    Example
    DENIZENS OF THE WARP
    DAEMONIC INCURSION - STRATEGIC PLOY STRATAGEM
    WHEN: Your Movement phase.
    TARGET: One Legiones Daemonica unit
    from your army that is arriving using the
    Deep Strike ability this phase.
    EFFECT: Your unit can be set up anywhere
    on the battlefield that is more than 3"
    horizontally away from all enemy models.
    RESTRICTIONS: A unit targeted by this
    Stratagem is not eligible to declare a
    charge in the same turn.
    Unlike a Stratagem such Rapid Ingress that specifically says
    TARGET: One unit from your army that is in Reserves.
    A number of Stratagems use the wording
    TARGET ...unit from your army that is arriving using the
    Deep Strike ability this phase.
    So does the LOD increase the CP of this stratagem if the unit is set up within 12" of the LOD?
    Views?

  • @scape1111
    @scape1111 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a proof that i actually watched the video i present you a minor flipup. At 11:30 you said accidentally that the indirect will miss on a 4 up.

    • @Bumbaclart247
      @Bumbaclart247 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Someone asked for proof?

  • @effindave6909
    @effindave6909 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I swear GW hates people that play death guard.

    • @spacemanx9595
      @spacemanx9595 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Awww you don't get pbc spam anymore. Sorry.

    • @effindave6909
      @effindave6909 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@spacemanx9595 wow you're all over these replies... Is GW paying you? They probably should be if they aren't.

    • @Wes-xk6hl
      @Wes-xk6hl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@spacemanx9595 for real, why are u in here being toxic on everyone's comments? U enjoy advertising negative things about yourself? Or do u actually think that's not what ur doing?

    • @wormydanceco.7604
      @wormydanceco.7604 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Salt in the wound when GW remembered to decrease points for guard artillery but gave nothing to PBCs.

  • @makhina8839
    @makhina8839 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Okay so two adds to the Hazardous section. You can increase Battlesuits to 4 wounds with a Shield Drone and secondly, these models might not even take 3 wounds because FnP exists