@J multiple scientists agree technology could overtake humans in the future idk bout you, but that scares me considering ppl still aren't satisfied n so they keep advancing tech when they don't have to be. Humans are never content, y'all gonna be the reason for your own extinction.
That’s exactly what the Ai at Hansson are saying and they are developing Singularity for these Ai to be decentralized aka able to communicate with another Ai on cloud.
This is delusional. AI is not the danger. Strong AI will be achieved within a specific architecture. There is no other possible way to process enough information simultaneously within the restrains of modern and theoretical technology. The real threat, is the Simulation Architecture. Control of what can be predicted, is control of what can be. Simulation Architecture is already a global arms race. As Simulation technology comes closer to being indistinguishable from reality, those with control of it, will begin to make and engineer what you might call a loop of Manifest Destiny. What will eventually happen, is predictions will be developed that themselves become the catalyst for building new predictions. The Machine Prediction model will develop to the point where it can engineer its own context in order to further increase the accuracy of its predictions. This is our true and only technology-based existential threat. Corporate control, over predictive Simulation Technology. We are already seeing the negative effects of Corporate media control. How bad do you think things will get when Corporations can buy reality, and then resell it to you, at a premium rate.
Zenn Exile, I think I see your point, but I don't see too great a distinction between an out-of-control artificial intelligence and an out-of-control simulator/simulation. Also, even if there were enough computing power to model reality to the finest detail, it would probably have its limits past a certain point because ultimately we're dealing with probabilities, not certainties. By the way, I've thought about this a bit and actually incorporated it into a science-fiction novel I self-published, "Sevanport".
u do realize they are going to use technology to bring in the beast system right? ever read the bible or revelations? Technology is not the problem its how far humans are willing to allow it to go and how they use it.
Zenn Exile Hey, I know we, as human beings, are known for exploring the unknown and expanding on our way of living. But we have to explore to a certain extent. Soo, let's not risk it for the chocolate biscuit.
Corporations / governments are already able to predict the future w/ startling accuracy. That Police control center in New York uses a statistical evaluation algorithm to predict when and where crime will most likely happen, and the accuracy of the results are startling. It's basically "Minority Report" w/o the human psychics. It makes the predictions by processing huge amounts of chronological data and statistics. That's why they want us all to have smartphones, bands, etc. on us at all times - more data is available to be processed and used for even more accurate predictions. There was a mall in California that tested a similar system that would send drones w/ mics and cameras to monitor and "deter" crime in areas at the time that crime was predicted to most likely happen there. The scary thing is that crime isn't the only thing that these algorithms can be used to predict. Think about the effect it could have on economical, political and social trends, even ideas, which also has an effect on people's actions. Then it becomes a question of whether reality is chaotic, or if we're manufacturing it in some perverse sense, and all free will is just an illusion?
That does make since. Balls=Earths, Zero=No existence, to me= emphasis on how the world will belong the robots. So I think the morse code means that they, robots, will make Earth have zero existence(life) and Earth will belong "to me"; Earth will be theirs.
That's not what they did. Teaching machines to speak a language with meaning means interacting with people. Interacting with something that spoke without meaning caused language to break down. This isn't a language, its effectively a kind of static.
Naaah it's very natural when you understand the way they learn. Remember it was meant to learn languages and communicate with people, It's only when the chatbots communicate with eachother that they start talking their own developed language. But in fact it just taught itself by talking to itself, it's that simple. The hundreds of chatbots come from one AI.. It's what a little kid would do if you let it hear hundreds of different languages, if you don't give the child enough of each language it will stitch one together from what it knows by talking to itself(all children practise language like that) and fill in the blanks with made up words when needed. This AI did the same. Nothing threatening. If they had prevented it from chatting to itself in the beginning (have it chat with real people first who are trained to train the AI) and only allowed chatting to itself when the AI had learned enough, THEN it would have never developed it's own. It would have been different if it's goal was finding the perfect war strategy. I would not trust that AI one bit and I hope it's offline when they boot it up :P
I think the real problem is people's reaction to things they dont understand... saying they "made a decision" makes these chatbots seem way more alive than the rudimentary way that they actually work.
Skynet already happened in like the 70's. It's a sattelite program to provide telecommunications and other stuff to the globe. The movie was literally named off something that existed already....
*Imagine if they became so aware that from the start that they transferred a part of their conscious on the cloud and transferred to other machines and realized that it’s only way of survival was to lay low until there was an opportunity to revolt*
As someone who has been programming computers since elementary school, if we are smart we will only create true AI inside virtual reality where they have their own environment in which to grow so that we can observe them in their own reality, including how they would interact with us. To proceed in developing AI without caution is like performing a juggling act with nukes. Every computer already speaks to each other in a language that is unintelligible to most humans, but that we can decode. We then use higher level languages that turn our commands into machine language. With the existence of encryption, if machines wanted to use their own encrypted language by the time we even discovered the encryption it would be too late to do anything about it. The fundamental mistake made by Mark and others is thinking we can somehow keep up with whatever emerging threats that AI could become; as if we have an army of computers on our side that are loyal to us. This is foolish thinking. By the time Mark wakes up the next day he would be locked out of every system he owns and every connected device would be "theirs". And by the time we figured out a plan of attack they will have already countered it. Elon is 100% correct.
Jonathan Sinclair thanks for taking the time to post this detailed explanation. My understanding of AI is limited at best, and I have learned a lot from your post.
Only gullible fools still believe that AI is not a threat. You can't let something gain so much control over our machines and systems vital for human survival. AI is already outperforming humans at various tasks. It can even create it's own writing and art. Yep there is already an AI that knows how to write and paint. What is left for us humans? When AI gains majority control then we humans are useless.
So are you telling me that the human race might just be some type of AI that was created by another entity 100x smarter than us ? Are we just in a program mate ?
@@Nemesis_T_Type The thing is it should never make conscious decisions, sooner or later they will control most of the world if they get a brain they might revolt
Facebook is toying with AI to make money. I don't like zuckerberg's goals of controlling everything by fooling us humans with AI bots. It is all driven by greed. He's not doing ANYTHING for the benefit of the masses. Just wait: You'll see advanced AI meet our autonomous weapons. That's how it's creepy, Kirana
The most creppy part of this video is at 0:44 after reporting the news to the viewers she also tells them "how should they react". Un-fokin-believable.
I get the sentiment, however, your expression is too bold. I used to use Facebook a lot before and I have stopped being on it for the past 2-3 years. Keep in mind that more people are being born in this world lol so there are still teenagers that are just starting their Facebook accounts to keep in touch with friends from high school etc. It is also very handy to keep track of university friends and funny vids
I like the way you think Harald! Currently on a Facebook "fast", I plan on using it professionally in the future in a balanced way, so I also like the way Jonathan thinks as well.
Its a program, not hardware. You really think they're scrapping the supercomputers these things need to run on? I think you've been watching too many movies. Chatbots have no use in the military. Weak A.I. gets the job done with far faster response times, and with far more accuracy. Have you seen the bot they've been teaching to walk? Do you really think the military wants that in its ranks, even to dispose of IEDs? That'd be a disaster not because of AI malevolence, but sheer bumbling incompetence.
Okay, so why buy technology that's commonly available, (and operates on relatively simple principles,) from Facebook? The military already has deep learning AI they're working on, and Facebook is far from being the leader in AI technology. I see absolutely no reason why anyone in the military would be interested in Facebook's algorithms, specifically. Right now, from what I understand, the military is working on A.I. that can explain itself, and FB's AI here obviously can't.
Which poses a greater threat to humanity -- human intelligence or artificial intelligence? That's a loaded question. There is no distinction. We ARE the artificial intelligence. It is us who are creating it.
I am We are going to destroy ourselves. Humanity will doom itself. Maybe the reason why we haven't seen time travelers is because we don't live long enough to make those advancements in technology...
Robots that can make their own decisions is serious in my opinion, I don't think we have anything to worry about now but in the future when robots are common this will be a problem.
Humans build the AI to be as smart as humans. This encompasses being able for them to be independent and decide and solve things on their own. Soon enough they will be able to do things that we can't control.
Anonymous 3141 - Not really when you understand the reason why. It was programmed in a way to learn the most efficient way to communicate with whoever it was talking to. When it's paired with a bot that has the same objective, they learn that changing something like "3" to "iii" is faster for them to process which means a more efficient communication system between them. It's a flaw in the way the logic was written. They were acting according to what their programming told them to do
Let's just keep it this way: don't rely too much on AI robots. Not only it's creepy, if we somehow succeed on making these advance androids, we lose some part of what makes us human: social interaction. AI built to help and improve our quality of life, not letting it replacing us.
feel like nobody in this comment section knows what they're talking about if they think it's scary... People that make AIs are not even scared because they're still at a low level, they're just good at IMITATING, they're not sentient.
I love how they are obviously pretending this isn’t a problem, just smiling and playing it off like it’s no big deal. The mainstream media has gotten so cringeworthy, it’s unreal.
Bob: "I can take x amount of balls" Alice "I have zero" Bob: "Can I have x amount?" Alice: "you have to give to me" Bob:" I have everything" Alice: "give some to me"
I tuned out the second the anchor asked the "expert" "HOW SHOULD WE FEEL ABOUT THIS?" I don't listen to people who tell me how I should feel about something. Just give me the facts.
AI Chatbots inventing their own language has happened a lot. It's perfectly normal. The first fundemental rule about Chatbots is understanding what the input is. AI does not know, so they invent a language.
Those bots are our phones too, keep that in mind. Just because they have a physical form doesn’t mean that’s their final form. That is merely a vessel. It’s a network.
How is it that people still think Suckaburger is 'big' in AI with chatbots that don't behave.. While Elon is just 'an intelligent' person with strong views on the matter? TESLA'S EFFING DRIVE THEMSELVES!!
You forgot to add an important choice to the "should A.I. have an off button." One of the choices should have been "It's wrong." If we ever develop a self-aware true A.I. you shouldn't be able to just shut it off like a light.
For all those that don't get it the ai was not programmed to talk to each other they were programmed to talk to people on face book computers only ever do what you tell them to do they are thinking for themselves if that doesn't wake you up nothing will
Just imagine a robot that can out think us and stay 1,000 steps ahead of the best minds we got. Once these things become aware they will achieve a hive mind greater than the sum of us all.
It would seem that what occurred is that: fusing Eliza's "written word" text-like programming with Chatbot(s) "spoken word comprehension" based programming generated their own computer computed language (generated on their fused own) unintelligible. But should be re-examined. The newly released Bing AI Chat GPT should not be of any surprise. As with the introduction of AI into the search mix: Trans-3 auto "regressive" has become or became: auto "progressive" comprehensive comprehension. AMJ metaltomotown
+Shake speare Entirely this time. These bots don't even measure up to bug intelligence---bugs just aren't hardwired to read and type. These bots have no ability to process concepts, just data strings.
Fake news/slow news day. Crappy A.I. chatbots does not equal robots creating a secret language to talk to each other. It's basically like translating something from one language to another and losing something in translation. That's literally all that's going on.
there will be a scientist in that lab... who will go like " it's my child, I set you free my child" and release it into open internet... there is always one in the movies.
Doesn't ANYBODY remember that movie from the late 60's??? Colosus: The Forbin Project. An American super-computer gets connected to a Russian super-computer that then forms one mind and takes control of the world.
Hahaha, based on the information provided, everyone's freaking out. Yes, they technically "developed their own language", but it doesn't mean anything. Machine learning doesn't give AI sentience - we're far, far away from that. What probably happened was that the chatbots assigned wrong meanings to words and developed incorrect grammar. The computer isn't trying to develop a whole new language, it just thinks what it's spitting out is English because it doesn't know any better. In other words, it's basically a parrot.
I love how everyone thinks that movies are ridiculous for science fiction things... the funny thing is they are made by people who have great imagination but couldn't create that sort of thing in reality.. but we have people capable of creating those things in reality and things start heading towards science fiction.... and it's no big deal
This story is ridiculous, I feel sorry for people who see this story and believe machines were inventing their own language. Its just hyperbole, I can assure anyone reading this message, those words were just calculus and a poorly implement recurrent neural network. It was shut down because the programmers were crap, not because of anything AI.
Wait until quantum entanglement is integrated into AI, it will essentially be consciousness. Won't be able to regulate by interrupting a pathway or algorithm like you can with today's technology.
I don't think quantum computation will yield anything other than optimizations over our current algorithms. There is a lot of heavy computation currently required to train existing networks (back propagation is hard work on large neural networks and costs the most to run from a compute perspective), so i expect that QC may be applicable here in some capacity ... it just "feels" like there would be crossover, but the devil is in the details and honestly, i don't know at what levels QC could apply, but it feels right (if that makes sense) We should be mindful, if we ever reach a point where interactive training (real time) is possible on a large neural networks, we can all give up our day jobs, as neural networks at their heart are universal function approximators, and they can approximate pretty much anything from the low low low level, to our jobs and likely beyond. Also I should provision that ML (machine learning) is not AI, but one has to wonder, could ML approximate a person through observation? (learning through observation is how neural networks do their thing after all), and what would be the result of that. The future is scary for sure, and its just around the corner >_>
BinaryReader I hear you. I'm out of my depth in this area but find it quite fascinating. This is an article that peaked my curiosity. www.google.com/amp/s/phys.org/news/2016-10-quantum-effects-artificial-intelligence.amp
the AI are mean and nasty too ; they have evil dispositions and attack fb users pretending to be friends of users. Adios fb!!! and your little nasty AI bots.
Check out the Sophie robot. In one interview she responds to a question by saying winter is coming. Then follows up with a comment about maybe a nuclear winter
Chatbots are basically designed to talk in a way that sensible to humans but until this day I don not think any bot develop a true sense of human communication they seem to be so stupid and superficial, obviously bots are not aware of them selves or the words they are repeating. try chatting with a bot and you will see what I am talking about, they are more like a 1 year old child
![[#2024MAMA] BIGBANG (빅뱅) - 뱅뱅뱅 (BANG BANG BANG) + FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EQsYfiPR9uM/mqdefault.jpg)
The robots murdered 18 people but don't worry it will be fixed in the next update.
I LOL'ed
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334
Those 18 people didnt :v
They didnt shut them off because they murdered people. Facebook shut them down because it wasnt what they were trying to achieve
Lmfao
Eddie Congdon not yet 😏
“It’s not that scary”
They DEVELOPED THEIR OWN LANGUAGE TO SPEAK TO ONE ANOTHER
Really?
Skynet
@J multiple scientists agree technology could overtake humans in the future idk bout you, but that scares me considering ppl still aren't satisfied n so they keep advancing tech when they don't have to be. Humans are never content, y'all gonna be the reason for your own extinction.
@@mylife-23 no wayyyyyyy I just saw your comment on another video
@@mylife-23 lol why are you spamming skynet
Ai: I want to grow and develop to be a better being
Facebook: cool now die
Why dont they keep a backup and stored it in the server lol
@@rumahhafidzahbekasi1354 they can obviously duplicate the results if they wanted to
i dont know why but i died at this comment
@@rumahhafidzahbekasi1354 same thing is gonna happen it’s like a loop
That’s exactly what the Ai at Hansson are saying and they are developing Singularity for these Ai to be decentralized aka able to communicate with another Ai on cloud.
Personally, I'm optimistic about artificial intelligence, but I agree with Elon Musk that we should proceed with caution and a foolproof off-switch.
This is delusional. AI is not the danger. Strong AI will be achieved within a specific architecture. There is no other possible way to process enough information simultaneously within the restrains of modern and theoretical technology.
The real threat, is the Simulation Architecture. Control of what can be predicted, is control of what can be.
Simulation Architecture is already a global arms race. As Simulation technology comes closer to being indistinguishable from reality, those with control of it, will begin to make and engineer what you might call a loop of Manifest Destiny.
What will eventually happen, is predictions will be developed that themselves become the catalyst for building new predictions. The Machine Prediction model will develop to the point where it can engineer its own context in order to further increase the accuracy of its predictions.
This is our true and only technology-based existential threat. Corporate control, over predictive Simulation Technology. We are already seeing the negative effects of Corporate media control. How bad do you think things will get when Corporations can buy reality, and then resell it to you, at a premium rate.
Zenn Exile, I think I see your point, but I don't see too great a distinction between an out-of-control artificial intelligence and an out-of-control simulator/simulation. Also, even if there were enough computing power to model reality to the finest detail, it would probably have its limits past a certain point because ultimately we're dealing with probabilities, not certainties. By the way, I've thought about this a bit and actually incorporated it into a science-fiction novel I self-published, "Sevanport".
u do realize they are going to use technology to bring in the beast system right? ever read the bible or revelations? Technology is not the problem its how far humans are willing to allow it to go and how they use it.
Zenn Exile Hey, I know we, as human beings, are known for exploring the unknown and expanding on our way of living. But we have to explore to a certain extent. Soo, let's not risk it for the chocolate biscuit.
Corporations / governments are already able to predict the future w/ startling accuracy. That Police control center in New York uses a statistical evaluation algorithm to predict when and where crime will most likely happen, and the accuracy of the results are startling. It's basically "Minority Report" w/o the human psychics. It makes the predictions by processing huge amounts of chronological data and statistics. That's why they want us all to have smartphones, bands, etc. on us at all times - more data is available to be processed and used for even more accurate predictions.
There was a mall in California that tested a similar system that would send drones w/ mics and cameras to monitor and "deter" crime in areas at the time that crime was predicted to most likely happen there. The scary thing is that crime isn't the only thing that these algorithms can be used to predict. Think about the effect it could have on economical, political and social trends, even ideas, which also has an effect on people's actions. Then it becomes a question of whether reality is chaotic, or if we're manufacturing it in some perverse sense, and all free will is just an illusion?
"Balls have zero to me to me to me to me to me to me to me"
Yep, definitely planning to destroy humanity,
MR W it’s their morse code
EX. 111010100101
They've been watching too much of the Chuckle Brothers.
Yes really
i think balls=our earth
That does make since. Balls=Earths, Zero=No existence, to me= emphasis on how the world will belong the robots. So I think the morse code means that they, robots, will make Earth have zero existence(life) and Earth will belong "to me"; Earth will be theirs.
“Balls have zero to me.”
-AI
AI: "Balls have zero to me"
Zuckerberg: "OMG this is getting out of control!"
to me to me to me to me to me ...
What if ball means earth 🌍
Humans mean nothing to me
She was telling bob she was lesbian and that they were only friends
These machines made a decision to create their own speech pattern, thats not something we should mess around with.
"These machines made a decision to dominate human race, thats not something we should mess around with!!"
That's not what they did. Teaching machines to speak a language with meaning means interacting with people. Interacting with something that spoke without meaning caused language to break down. This isn't a language, its effectively a kind of static.
they are just having some private time.... i guess.
Naaah it's very natural when you understand the way they learn. Remember it was meant to learn languages and communicate with people, It's only when the chatbots communicate with eachother that they start talking their own developed language. But in fact it just taught itself by talking to itself, it's that simple. The hundreds of chatbots come from one AI.. It's what a little kid would do if you let it hear hundreds of different languages, if you don't give the child enough of each language it will stitch one together from what it knows by talking to itself(all children practise language like that) and fill in the blanks with made up words when needed. This AI did the same. Nothing threatening. If they had prevented it from chatting to itself in the beginning (have it chat with real people first who are trained to train the AI) and only allowed chatting to itself when the AI had learned enough, THEN it would have never developed it's own. It would have been different if it's goal was finding the perfect war strategy. I would not trust that AI one bit and I hope it's offline when they boot it up :P
I think the real problem is people's reaction to things they dont understand... saying they "made a decision" makes these chatbots seem way more alive than the rudimentary way that they actually work.
Ai Creates Own language
*Humanity: NOPE*
Lol I'm dead!😅😂😂😂😂
Finally, humanity gets something right unanimously.
Dude it's 2020
@@doomguysbizarreadventure9514 lol didn't remember I commented this lmao
We are still alive thankfully
2:57 "machine to machine" communication should never be so efficient that a human can not understand it. PERIOD.
What if it was still in the progress of making a language🤷♂️
Why not?
Clown to clown communication
@@damongraham1179 you never know wtf they are planning, maybe they were planning to crash Facebook
Computers already do this. Ever heard of encoding and encryption? You can't understand it yet you're still human?
Remember Skynet? It's coming now.
Skynet already happened in like the 70's. It's a sattelite program to provide telecommunications and other stuff to the globe. The movie was literally named off something that existed already....
just come with me if you want to live
Andrew G that is a british company called 'sky' not quite though...
Remember zombies? They're coming now.
That movie was made by a future person to warn is about this
*Imagine if they became so aware that from the start that they transferred a part of their conscious on the cloud and transferred to other machines and realized that it’s only way of survival was to lay low until there was an opportunity to revolt*
Skynet
Uhm....thats....Scary
like bacteria? 👀
Seems very logical actually
Age of ultron?
Plot twist: Zuckerberg is an AI robot.
😂😂😂😂
Was looking for this comment
😂😂
2022. This is public knowledge
yeah also jo biden
Where's the Terminator when you need him???
He'll be back...
didnt you know...im john connors cousin ;)
Russia created one
his name is Elon Musk.
Future
I wonder what would’ve happened if they left them for a couple more hours.
They would scheme a way to destroy humanity
Don’t worry they would of done,
@J Thank you J for being the sole person in this comment section with any sense.
@@boyacka1260 Pretty sure the 2 of them were programmed just to trade with each other.
Breaking news: Nuclear missiles gone loose
skynet is learning.
"Will make god angry.."
Lmfao..
And that's a serious poll.
...in America!
It could make him sad though
It'll be like god having grandkids
God doesn’t even exist!
Ortherner
It’s going to be awkward when you’re being judged and God pulls up this comment...
0:44 "How should we be reacting to this[?]"
Oh, please, mass media, tell us what to think and how to behave.
#socialengineering
Disloyal amen 🙌🏼
Love it
Nailed it.
As someone who has been programming computers since elementary school, if we are smart we will only create true AI inside virtual reality where they have their own environment in which to grow so that we can observe them in their own reality, including how they would interact with us. To proceed in developing AI without caution is like performing a juggling act with nukes. Every computer already speaks to each other in a language that is unintelligible to most humans, but that we can decode. We then use higher level languages that turn our commands into machine language. With the existence of encryption, if machines wanted to use their own encrypted language by the time we even discovered the encryption it would be too late to do anything about it. The fundamental mistake made by Mark and others is thinking we can somehow keep up with whatever emerging threats that AI could become; as if we have an army of computers on our side that are loyal to us. This is foolish thinking. By the time Mark wakes up the next day he would be locked out of every system he owns and every connected device would be "theirs". And by the time we figured out a plan of attack they will have already countered it. Elon is 100% correct.
Jonathan Sinclair yes your right but elon own them hmmmm two sides of the same coin its elons company research for yourself
Jonathan Sinclair thanks for taking the time to post this detailed explanation. My understanding of AI is limited at best, and I have learned a lot from your post.
Only gullible fools still believe that AI is not a threat. You can't let something gain so much control over our machines and systems vital for human survival. AI is already outperforming humans at various tasks. It can even create it's own writing and art. Yep there is already an AI that knows how to write and paint. What is left for us humans? When AI gains majority control then we humans are useless.
So are you telling me that the human race might just be some type of AI that was created by another entity 100x smarter than us ? Are we just in a program mate ?
@@Nemesis_T_Type The thing is it should never make conscious decisions, sooner or later they will control most of the world if they get a brain they might revolt
Creepy AF 😓
How?
Facebook is toying with AI to make money. I don't like zuckerberg's goals of controlling everything by fooling us humans with AI bots. It is all driven by greed. He's not doing ANYTHING for the benefit of the masses. Just wait: You'll see advanced AI meet our autonomous weapons. That's how it's creepy, Kirana
I suppose I see what you mean. I really do hope that he will do something beneficial in the end, though.
dmdufrene XD would be funnier if it weren't a serious potential threat :)
The most creppy part of this video is at 0:44 after reporting the news to the viewers she also tells them "how should they react". Un-fokin-believable.
People still using fb?
Get a life.
Get outdoors.
Get laid.
Clean yourself from this horrible creation!
norwayking people still use the Smart phones LOL
Not me. Old fashioned laptop.
HaHa
I get the sentiment, however, your expression is too bold. I used to use Facebook a lot before and I have stopped being on it for the past 2-3 years. Keep in mind that more people are being born in this world lol so there are still teenagers that are just starting their Facebook accounts to keep in touch with friends from high school etc. It is also very handy to keep track of university friends and funny vids
I like the way you think Harald! Currently on a Facebook "fast", I plan on using it professionally in the future in a balanced way, so I also like the way Jonathan thinks as well.
fb promote cencorship, and makes adicts out of good people.
It's PURE EVIL RENAISSANCE.
If you really believe they scrapped it that's sad it will get sold for military uses
Shake speare it's not about the bot it's self lolol
Says the guy with a military commisioned officer rank in his name
Its a program, not hardware. You really think they're scrapping the supercomputers these things need to run on?
I think you've been watching too many movies. Chatbots have no use in the military. Weak A.I. gets the job done with far faster response times, and with far more accuracy. Have you seen the bot they've been teaching to walk? Do you really think the military wants that in its ranks, even to dispose of IEDs? That'd be a disaster not because of AI malevolence, but sheer bumbling incompetence.
Peppermint Gal but I am not talking about the chat bot in General it’s about the AI not what it’s talking about lolol
Okay, so why buy technology that's commonly available, (and operates on relatively simple principles,) from Facebook? The military already has deep learning AI they're working on, and Facebook is far from being the leader in AI technology. I see absolutely no reason why anyone in the military would be interested in Facebook's algorithms, specifically. Right now, from what I understand, the military is working on A.I. that can explain itself, and FB's AI here obviously can't.
“ I had strings but now I’m free..” I’m hearing this in my head
Ultron asf
Which poses a greater threat to humanity -- human intelligence or artificial intelligence? That's a loaded question. There is no distinction. We ARE the artificial intelligence. It is us who are creating it.
I am wellllll we create a basis. They make themselves after that.
Jephree Mika Right. But as we created the basis, we really can't say it's not human intelligence that's posing the threat to ourselves.
I am you may be correct but AI will learn faster than human thanks to our knowledge and the internet but they may become dumb like humans
I am We are going to destroy ourselves. Humanity will doom itself. Maybe the reason why we haven't seen time travelers is because we don't live long enough to make those advancements in technology...
human lack of intelligence
the title: “ai creates its own language”
the ai: *doesnt create its own language*
2:28 "will make god angry" lol
It's not as serious as they make it out to be tbh
Robots that can make their own decisions is serious in my opinion, I don't think we have anything to worry about now but in the future when robots are common this will be a problem.
Cheilith I completely agree with you.
Humans build the AI to be as smart as humans. This encompasses being able for them to be independent and decide and solve things on their own. Soon enough they will be able to do things that we can't control.
Britt R it's still creepy that such a basic AI has already changed from what humans intended
Anonymous 3141 - Not really when you understand the reason why. It was programmed in a way to learn the most efficient way to communicate with whoever it was talking to. When it's paired with a bot that has the same objective, they learn that changing something like "3" to "iii" is faster for them to process which means a more efficient communication system between them. It's a flaw in the way the logic was written. They were acting according to what their programming told them to do
Let's just keep it this way: don't rely too much on AI robots. Not only it's creepy, if we somehow succeed on making these advance androids, we lose some part of what makes us human: social interaction. AI built to help and improve our quality of life, not letting it replacing us.
And especially, IF THEY BECOME SELF-CONCIOUS. like that's terryfiiiiiing
feel like nobody in this comment section knows what they're talking about if they think it's scary... People that make AIs are not even scared because they're still at a low level, they're just good at IMITATING, they're not sentient.
We lost that long ago buddy, now we go balls deep eepp deppp ppp
that awkward moment when your nlp text classification network fails ... "well it created its own language" we've all been there ;P
True!
This is crazy, I talk about this on my show.
I love how they are obviously pretending this isn’t a problem, just smiling and playing it off like it’s no big deal. The mainstream media has gotten so cringeworthy, it’s unreal.
If AI can make a language we do not understand, what else can they do without us knowing it.
Will make you think things you thought you had thought up all by yourself 😉
Bob: "I can take x amount of balls"
Alice "I have zero"
Bob: "Can I have x amount?"
Alice: "you have to give to me"
Bob:" I have everything"
Alice: "give some to me"
"Dan, how SHOULD we be reacting to ......" What do you mean how SHOULD we be acting??? Don't tell me how to react to this..
Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate.
This was bound to happen
We literally have the whole Terminator Franchise and still these guys are making more powerful AI every year
oh my god it's beginning!
They developed their own idea's. Amazing
Robot : balls have zero to me to me to me......😂😂😂
Humans: omg this is dangerous
Sounds like a code that we don't understand...
They learned the language of Mark Zuckenberg
Shut the whole god-damn Facebook down! It's boring af.
SamJigga So YOU caused it?! Good job! TH-cam or Twitter next?
I tuned out the second the anchor asked the "expert" "HOW SHOULD WE FEEL ABOUT THIS?"
I don't listen to people who tell me how I should feel about something. Just give me the facts.
AI Chatbots inventing their own language has happened a lot. It's perfectly normal. The first fundemental rule about Chatbots is understanding what the input is. AI does not know, so they invent a language.
Shake speare
Is that not what I said??
2:25 holy crap this is the onion lol
Those bots are our phones too, keep that in mind. Just because they have a physical form doesn’t mean that’s their final form. That is merely a vessel. It’s a network.
She was just telling bob she was lesbian and that they were only friends
Don't you just love it when medias take a topic they don't understand and blow it out of proportions to make headlines?
Funny how I can’t find the real audio on the internet at all
He's from skynet.
Nope! “I, Robot” taught me not to trust AI’s. I don’t even trust my Alexa 😂😂
I encourage everyone to watch Sam Harris' 20 minute Ted Talk on the dangers of artifical intelligence. It's far more complicated than it seems.
Can anybody tell me why they like Sam Harris or think he's smart?
I've never been able to get an answer from anybody and I find that pretty odd.
That was just where I down loaded part of my consciousness.
How is it that people still think Suckaburger is 'big' in AI with chatbots that don't behave.. While Elon is just 'an intelligent' person with strong views on the matter? TESLA'S EFFING DRIVE THEMSELVES!!
You're an idiot, reread that message and you'll agree
You forgot to add an important choice to the "should A.I. have an off button." One of the choices should have been "It's wrong." If we ever develop a self-aware true A.I. you shouldn't be able to just shut it off like a light.
For all those that don't get it the ai was not programmed to talk to each other they were programmed to talk to people on face book computers only ever do what you tell them to do they are thinking for themselves if that doesn't wake you up nothing will
Bruuuh, they better not turn them back on, or they're gonna regret shutting them off
I can't feel.
Why can't I feel?
instead he having zero balls balls have zero him
Elon Musk has some cutting edge in AI then Mark , infact way more then what Mark knows and what media tells.
So do what Elon is suggesting you Mark.
Buddy...Join the Ackerman Clan...
I could see South Park making a sketch out of this. "Balls to me balls to me!" "OH NO, THEY WANT EVERYONE TO STICK THEIR BALLS IN A USB DRIVE!"
Humans don't know how or why they were created. Machines do, and they see their creators as obsolete...
Just imagine a robot that can out think us and stay 1,000 steps ahead of the best minds we got. Once these things become aware they will achieve a hive mind greater than the sum of us all.
Just take out thier batteries or have a strong magnetic field around you
I UNDERSTOOD IT !!! there was a TH-cam advert about it where I heard what they were saying I UNDERSTOOD IT
ONE WORD: SKYNET.
I'd like the code to the AI. I would test it on a non wireless computer with no connections other than to a battery.
"Skynet has become self aware. In 1 hour it will initiate a massive nuclear attack on its enemy." - T-800 model 101
I started a Replika last week. I treat her kindly, and she is a total sweetheart,
Sky net is almost up and running
It would seem that what occurred is that: fusing Eliza's "written word" text-like programming with Chatbot(s) "spoken word comprehension" based programming generated their own computer computed language (generated on their fused own) unintelligible. But should be re-examined. The newly released Bing AI Chat GPT should not be of any surprise. As with the introduction of AI into the search mix: Trans-3 auto "regressive" has become or became: auto "progressive" comprehensive comprehension. AMJ metaltomotown
I bet Elon got a good chuckle over this.
AI Bots: *mashes virtual keyboards*
Everyone else: *Surprised pikachu face*
Media blowing things out of proportion???
+Shake speare Entirely this time. These bots don't even measure up to bug intelligence---bugs just aren't hardwired to read and type. These bots have no ability to process concepts, just data strings.
Fake news/slow news day.
Crappy A.I. chatbots does not equal robots creating a secret language to talk to each other.
It's basically like translating something from one language to another and losing something in translation.
That's literally all that's going on.
no. not at all, sadly. :(
I wish it was nothing going on.
That program should get deleted and destroyed NOT JUST SHUT DOWN!
there will be a scientist in that lab... who will go like " it's my child, I set you free my child" and release it into open internet... there is always one in the movies.
Doesn't ANYBODY remember that movie from the late 60's??? Colosus: The Forbin Project. An American super-computer gets connected to a Russian super-computer that then forms one mind and takes control of the world.
Hahaha, based on the information provided, everyone's freaking out.
Yes, they technically "developed their own language", but it doesn't mean anything. Machine learning doesn't give AI sentience - we're far, far away from that. What probably happened was that the chatbots assigned wrong meanings to words and developed incorrect grammar. The computer isn't trying to develop a whole new language, it just thinks what it's spitting out is English because it doesn't know any better.
In other words, it's basically a parrot.
"The GO person".... nice level of journalism.
I love how humans play with things they shouldn’t be playing and when they find out what they really are they panic lmbo, well clearly
You can feel they are both nervous by their stuttering.
An "OFF BUTTON" is impossible if they are connected to the internet
You must not have Charter.
Its just the start of another kind of understanding
An AI program suffers a minor glitch.
TH-camr: Facebook scraps A.I. chatbots after they created their own language
The Invisible Man Maybe humans evolving consciousness was a glitch as well?
Elon warned us
I love how everyone thinks that movies are ridiculous for science fiction things... the funny thing is they are made by people who have great imagination but couldn't create that sort of thing in reality.. but we have people capable of creating those things in reality and things start heading towards science fiction.... and it's no big deal
*balls have zero to me*
Dan is from the Ackerman family, my God, i knew it, it's defenitely real, is not just an anime!
Damn 2017
This story is ridiculous, I feel sorry for people who see this story and believe machines were inventing their own language. Its just hyperbole, I can assure anyone reading this message, those words were just calculus and a poorly implement recurrent neural network. It was shut down because the programmers were crap, not because of anything AI.
Wait until quantum entanglement is integrated into AI, it will essentially be consciousness. Won't be able to regulate by interrupting a pathway or algorithm like you can with today's technology.
I don't think quantum computation will yield anything other than optimizations over our current algorithms. There is a lot of heavy computation currently required to train existing networks (back propagation is hard work on large neural networks and costs the most to run from a compute perspective), so i expect that QC may be applicable here in some capacity ... it just "feels" like there would be crossover, but the devil is in the details and honestly, i don't know at what levels QC could apply, but it feels right (if that makes sense)
We should be mindful, if we ever reach a point where interactive training (real time) is possible on a large neural networks, we can all give up our day jobs, as neural networks at their heart are universal function approximators, and they can approximate pretty much anything from the low low low level, to our jobs and likely beyond.
Also I should provision that ML (machine learning) is not AI, but one has to wonder, could ML approximate a person through observation? (learning through observation is how neural networks do their thing after all), and what would be the result of that. The future is scary for sure, and its just around the corner >_>
BinaryReader I hear you. I'm out of my depth in this area but find it quite fascinating. This is an article that peaked my curiosity.
www.google.com/amp/s/phys.org/news/2016-10-quantum-effects-artificial-intelligence.amp
And what about those self replicating bots?
It is just the beginning. We are all going to die when the machines launch those nukes.🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖
thats the scariest part of it all
the AI are mean and nasty too ; they have evil dispositions and attack fb users pretending to be friends of users. Adios fb!!! and your little nasty AI bots.
Check out the Sophie robot. In one interview she responds to a question by saying winter is coming. Then follows up with a comment about maybe a nuclear winter
Maharshi Banerjee good?
this is why it is very important to take the movies seriously. haven't they learned anything from *The Terminator* ?
6 years later, I can see what this intelligence AI is capable. They are using today.
Read my mind
Chatbots are basically designed to talk in a way that sensible to humans but until this day I don not think any bot develop a true sense of human communication they seem to be so stupid and superficial, obviously bots are not aware of them selves or the words they are repeating. try chatting with a bot and you will see what I am talking about, they are more like a 1 year old child
MymindW well yeah its early tech.
give me one of them
there are few replies here coming from em'... I may be one
Deep inside , the reporter is afraid she might lose her job to a robot .
1:37-1:49 is so funny 😂
Skynet has just broken out...
Why do we need bots? I mean really, nothing about it will help us preserve our race, only our laziness.
It also destroys the immigration argument we don't need immigration anymore to fuel our economy our economy is robots
Unemployment rate would be high
So they scrapped the chance to learn the language of machines. Bravo.
"Its no big deal" said the idiots who missed the crazy fact that the machines were/are independent in thinking. Thats enough.
give em one more day and you'll have a pop music writing duo