2.7 turbo dragy times + 2.7 shootout

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
  • The 716carguys play with a 2021 2.7 liter turbo Chevy Silverado and a 2019 f150 eco boost then they put the Silverado to the dragy test to see what kind of times that little motor in that big truck can put down.

ความคิดเห็น • 247

  • @Yung_Hefty
    @Yung_Hefty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Hey 2.7L F150 owner here, and you wanna launch at 2500rpm it’s the sweet spot. If you just keep it on the gas as much as you possibly can without moving you’ll 1) not have enough boost (cause it’ll just open the waste gate) 2) you’ll burn down the motor. Gettin too hot.

  • @clam741
    @clam741 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This is cute , Chevy guys were making fun of ford putting a turbo 6 in a full size truck yet here they are with a turbo 4 cyl lol

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s crazy the power they can make with small motors now

    • @RW-zh7kl
      @RW-zh7kl ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Strangely GM always seems to do what Ford does a year or two after

    • @victor714ps3
      @victor714ps3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      whats up with that? I get it with the sound but why is everything that is not a v8 being put down? Is it because the little engines are being engineered to be comparable with v8 engines?

  • @marcharris4176
    @marcharris4176 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Chevy guys talking about how great the 4 banger turbo when the Ecoboost came out they laughed.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I never did……I knew the concept wasn’t stupid buick made it work pretty well in the 80s

  • @kristoforstewart995
    @kristoforstewart995 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A 2015 F150 2.7 (325HP, 375lb*ft) Supercab XL 4x4 with a 3.55 differential and 6 speed ZF transmission runs 6.1s 0-60 and a 14.7 quarter mile.

  • @alicepooper8562
    @alicepooper8562 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Put that 4 banger in the Colorado 🚀

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That be a fun truck actually ha

    • @rocketcowboy6462
      @rocketcowboy6462 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s what they are going to do, they went away from the Diesel engines and will be putting those bad boys in the colorado, at least that’s what I read

    • @MeatloafMelvin
      @MeatloafMelvin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They did. And i can say that 310hp amd 430tq in a ZR2 colorado is a blast.

  • @kevinkelley3657
    @kevinkelley3657 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have no experience with the Chevy, but I do have a 2018 f150 with the 2.7......with a tank of 93 octane, my truck feels like a magic carpet, all you have to do is almost think about accelerating, and the truck just goes and goes. With a tank of 87 octane, the truck will go, but you have to use more pedal, and it almost feels like you have to push the truck to make it go fast. The difference is "Night and Day".

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m really starting to like the eco boost trucks i get the gm discount but damn those trucks are cool

    • @freeman48083
      @freeman48083 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Put it into Sport mode. Even with 87 it moves like a scalded cat.

  • @jdp0316
    @jdp0316 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    4wd slows it down a little bit at the top end they actually launch pretty well in 2wd

  • @dwightneisler3844
    @dwightneisler3844 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a 2021 GMC 2.7L. Traded in my 2017 GMC 5.3L lease. They had no V8's on the lot so I took the 2.7. I love this truck.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Right !!! I understand how truck guys don’t like the idea of a 4 cylinder but it’s surprisingly a powerful little motor tows fine gets out of it own way

  • @JKZ103
    @JKZ103 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The little 4 bangers just can't hang with the fords... Ford is on top right now with the trucks. Good little budget motor for the guys that don't want to spend alot of money but it's not a race motor. It has its place in the market. Fyi the ford 2.7 v6 gets 18- 24 mpg. Surprise by how bad the chevy motor mpg is?

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      I drive with a heavy foot but with that being said yea still not what I thought it would be

  • @j.w.presents9552
    @j.w.presents9552 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ive a bone stock 2018 f150 4x4 super cab. On 93 octane it went 14.1 @ 96.8mph! 9.0 @ 77mph in the 1/8 mile! 2,200rpm ish launch

  • @hdsred7553
    @hdsred7553 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ford for the win!

  • @samirbudic
    @samirbudic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2.7 t silverado is no joke they have it in caddilac and it's crazy 2022 silverado 2.7 t has 420tq monster

    • @CHIM601
      @CHIM601 ปีที่แล้ว

      By what I seen here chevys 2.7 is an absolute joke

  • @Oddman1980
    @Oddman1980 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Probably faster than my NA 3.7 in my F150. 🤣 I'm interested to see how these small displacement turbo truck engines do over the years, because it's pretty wild what they are capable of.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yesssssss the test of time

  • @keithrankin6113
    @keithrankin6113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I bought a 2022 2.7 Silverado after the AFM destroyed my 5.3 in my 2018 Silverado. Honestly am really impressed with the little truck engine. The low end torque is very diesel like. I did take the 2.7 ecoboost for a ride and yes it is much faster. To me it came down to value and towing capability. The ford had a 3:15 rear ratio and a 6500 pound towing capacity. The little 4 had a 9000 pound towing capacity which fits my camper much better. With the truck shortage you can only get what’s on the lot.

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea I really don’t mind the turbo 4 cylinder it’s been a great truck so far we’re definitely going to be towing videos and more stuff with it soon and yes the market is insane unfortunately

    • @Samyouell11510
      @Samyouell11510 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The turbo 4 from gm is super impressive. Pretty excited to see how well the next iteration of it does with the improvements and numbers bumped up, sounds like it will be a beast. I have a 2.7 ecoboost f150 and my wife has a 2.3 ecoboost explorer and I can honestly say I’ll never go back to a NA engine.

    • @Yung_Hefty
      @Yung_Hefty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah it’s all about the gearing and tow packages and such. The motors from both GM and Ford are more than capable of towing but it’s all down the specifics. My 2.7 has 3.73 gears and a 11k towing capacity. I’ve got the Texas edition with the luxury package and max towing all ordered special before Covid and such. But yeah in this day and age what’s there is basically all your options so I don’t blame you for picking the GM and it’s not a bad choice what so ever. Anyways my point is both motors are great. I’m really impressed with them and I think naturally aspirated v8’s are out dated.

    • @chris1451
      @chris1451 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And you bought another pigolet LOL

    • @mscottlawrence2037
      @mscottlawrence2037 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Samyouell11510 what year f150

  • @Bceltics112288
    @Bceltics112288 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Press and hold traction control to take off stability control as well

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes wayyyy ahead of ya thanks though

  • @Tom-yz4zc
    @Tom-yz4zc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love your Vids!

  • @MrAffable
    @MrAffable 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My stock 2020 2.7 RCSB the best I got was a 9.4 in 4hi at the 8th with a shit reaction time and with zero clue tf I was doing

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It’s probably a bit quicker if ya launch it 4wd but yea the fords are absolutely quicker for sure

  • @RussellLicata
    @RussellLicata 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Believe it or not that is a very close time we got on our truck at Lancaster speedway in New York. It’s a 1/8 mile track. With 2 people best time 9.69 @ 71mph

  • @Simracing25
    @Simracing25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    exobeast for the win

  • @bpatterson308
    @bpatterson308 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Man a tune on that truck could probably make some impressive gains

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Eventually that’ll happen I’m curious what that little 4 cylinder can do

  • @PhilipBair
    @PhilipBair หลายเดือนก่อน

    What kind of truck do I have? 2002 Silverado 4x4 with a 4.8 LS motor. 224k miles. Gets around 18-19 mpg. Rusty but very trusty. I know people with these engines that got 400k miles out of them.
    My little 4.8 feels way stronger than my previous Ford 5.4 2 valve and a Dodge hemi 2006 with high miles.

  • @briannoke4880
    @briannoke4880 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Ford took you to gapplebees

  • @sethbell5575
    @sethbell5575 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have a 2018 2.7 eco boost cts 3 edge evolution tune I have no times to give yet it’s unreal thoe

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea there quick for what they are

  • @10rninjariderzx
    @10rninjariderzx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My 3.5 raptor will kill that junk

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well I hope your 70 thousand dollar truck would stomp out a 4 cylinder 👍

    • @johneary8874
      @johneary8874 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      When you buy a Raptor, you need to work it into every conversation.

  • @fscottgray9784
    @fscottgray9784 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I wonder how the 2022 GM 2.7 would do now that it has 80 more ft. lbs. of torque? I just bought a regular cab short bed 4x4 GMC with the 2.7 and 3.42 gears. Really impressed with it so far.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      Right its surprising

    • @stonks2171
      @stonks2171 ปีที่แล้ว

      2022 gmc 2.7l turbo does about 6-7 sec I bought the refresh

    • @ericj810
      @ericj810 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya the high output version is better. And the tricifica chevy 2.7 is 357hp 488lbs or tourqe. Try that one next time.

    • @nahs3195
      @nahs3195 ปีที่แล้ว

      You should be thanking ford for it 😂😂😂

  • @markweymouth6368
    @markweymouth6368 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BLUE OVAL 🏁☝️

  • @1obscura
    @1obscura ปีที่แล้ว

    4cy are for civics. 6cy are for sedans and small trucks. Turbos are added to help add power. A 4cy turbo in a truck is guna burn out

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      How do you mean burnout ?

    • @1obscura
      @1obscura ปีที่แล้ว

      @@716carguys4 does a canyon weigh more than a civic? Unless 4cy have changed, they really don't produce enough power. Which is why a turbo is needed. If the truck weighs more I'd think the constant pressure engine is under a long with turbos constantly working would produce more wear on engine than a civic with a turbo would. Plus a 4sounds like crap. I drive a soul. Loud and annoying. Can only imagine the sound of these trucks. But hey. Just my opinion. I'm not a mechanic. I mean I drive a 2010 soul. 😂.

  • @isaias131982
    @isaias131982 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ecoboost are beasts I still like the looks of the Silverado 🥲

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea ecoboosts are quick Trucks for what they are

    • @patriot101101
      @patriot101101 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only thing those Ecoboost trucks have so many limiters and when you push it a little too hard they go into limp mode with no codes. I had to disable more protections in my truck to keep it out of limp mode.

    • @isaias131982
      @isaias131982 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@patriot101101 I’ve noticed mine won’t go anything over 105 mph 🫤

  • @stroln
    @stroln 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hat on backwards and sun glasses, funny

  • @foxwithshades7080
    @foxwithshades7080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For a four banger racing a V6 it ain't bad. Probably could get tons more power out of that Four pot tho.

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m tempted to have it tuned and messed with ha

  • @FloridaCoastalGuy
    @FloridaCoastalGuy 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My stock 2018 F-150 2.7L SCSB FX4 turns 1/4 in 14.5
    0-60 = 5.9 seconds
    on 93 octane

  • @derekpate8786
    @derekpate8786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2022 Silverado 2.7 high output stock 9.76

  • @kona6451
    @kona6451 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interested in the new Hurricane 3.0 straight 6 twin turbo from Ram coming.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Whaaaaa I didn’t know about that !!! Sounds badass

    • @kona6451
      @kona6451 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@716carguys4 ya look it up. will also have a high output version with all forged insides. Mega power

  • @sherylellingson3538
    @sherylellingson3538 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1/8th mile? Come on!! Let's do the full 1/4 mile.

  • @helgarussell9142
    @helgarussell9142 ปีที่แล้ว

    He had the chevy launch at 3k plus RPM. Not bad for stock converter

    • @JKZ103
      @JKZ103 ปีที่แล้ว

      The lower the torque the higher the converter stall has to be. It has to have a high stall. The fords stall in the low 2000's because of the monster torque.

  • @davetrepse83
    @davetrepse83 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    RAM 2014 5.7 hemi just exhaust 15.091 1/4mile
    Cadillac srx2014 stock 15.001 1/4mile

  • @Jackknife-TV
    @Jackknife-TV ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonder what a 2022 Silverado 2.7 turbo would do considering it now has 420 pound-feet of torque .

    • @dbladsacker9946
      @dbladsacker9946 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would pull at the line than get hawked down on the big end.

    • @02hreblue30
      @02hreblue30 ปีที่แล้ว

      still heavier than the Ford

  • @edpenkalski8937
    @edpenkalski8937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Any forced induction motors gonna see a bit better performance with higher octane .. a good high flow air filter will help a lot ... I believe Diablo sport makes a tuner for that vehicle that will most likely put you in higher 8s flat 9s if the info draggy provided is accurate

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ha that be pretty wild for just a 2.7

    • @edpenkalski8937
      @edpenkalski8937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yea adding boost is a fun thing and pretty easy just remember if you up the boost you have to up the fuel too on my 2.5 I'm running 700 cc Injectors and making about 20 psi out of a 54 mm turbo ... The Diablo tuner is the key to running it efficient and it gives you control over pretty much everything spark advance boost pressure fuel presser it'll also depending on the model you get work as a boost and fuel gage

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@edpenkalski8937 oh no shit this is a whole new world for me

    • @edpenkalski8937
      @edpenkalski8937 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea when I got my first turbo I was lost... Then everything got really easy then I encounter new problems like boost leaks and over boost... But if you keep it mild you can still have a shit ton of fun and embarrass V8 guys

    • @okiedokie3845
      @okiedokie3845 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@edpenkalski8937 that's gotta be a fun ride ya got going!

  • @edpenkalski8937
    @edpenkalski8937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Without the Diablo tune my car would run 10.2 to 10.0 with Diablo now it does 9.2

  • @miked240
    @miked240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seems as though a re run with both using the same gas is in order. I’ve owned many forced induction vehicles factory or not and most are tuned to advance spark and with dohc even possibly phase the cams to maximize power and efficiency. The vehicle will advance until it gets knock and then retards back slightly(protecting the engine from detonation). Of course the knock is pushed further away the higher thE octane is (reluctance to burn/ resist knock). Why e85 makes most power cheapest if properly utilized.

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s what I’ve been reading I didn’t think it would make a difference but it can

    • @JKZ103
      @JKZ103 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's not enough octane in the world that would make that I4 beat any EcoBoost. It's a good motor but both trucks are stock so that's an apples-to-apples. If you tune them you would get the same result. It will use the high octane table until it sees the knock threshold then switch to the low octane table.

  • @cfltitan
    @cfltitan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yeah you gotta bring something big to the plate for even a stock ecoboost. They’re nasty motors, even the baby 2.7. I think the 2.7 is underrated too because when my 3.5 was stock a stock 2.7 could hang door to door with me (identical 4wd crew cabs and both 10 speeds) until about 75mph then I’d slowly pull away.
    Anyways I’ve got a fully loaded 2017 3.5 ecoboost with the 10 speed. Bone stock I averaged 9.3 1/8 miles. I now have a 5 Star 93 octane tune and am in the high 7’s 1/8th mile. It’s beyond stupid fast now. 😂 Sooooooo much fun though.

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I had a hard time in my last two trucks (both were 5.3 trucks) they were close races but they pulled me

    • @derekd8778
      @derekd8778 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@dragracer455 close races my ass lmao! That ecoboost walk all-over your 5.3s... don't try and talk it up

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@derekd8778 relax buddy ha….no both were decent races but like I said both ecoboosts pulled me

    • @static7415
      @static7415 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@derekd8778 a 2.7 does not walk a 5.3.

    • @derekd8778
      @derekd8778 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@static7415 they sure do. Just like my 3.5 ecoboost walks everything else diesels included. Come at me!

  • @SirtubalotTX
    @SirtubalotTX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The CT4 with the 2.7t is running even better numbers and it's an impressive engine.
    Any tunes out for this motor yet?

    • @gavindrewry8652
      @gavindrewry8652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AFE has the scorcher blue but no actual tunes yet.

    • @SirtubalotTX
      @SirtubalotTX 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gavindrewry8652 I'll check it out.

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      When I last looked not really

  • @RDvisions
    @RDvisions 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonder how bad my 2001 Silverado 5.3 would smoke the Chevy 2.7 turbo

  • @TriedTrue
    @TriedTrue ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So should I trade in my 5.3 for the 2.7 turbo? I feel like the 5.3 has way more too end.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      My 5.3 trucks always get beat ecoboosts 😞

  • @mikeoverby2232
    @mikeoverby2232 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You cannot run the cheap gas if you’re gonna run a turbo vehicle. I saw an article on car driver were they tested the Ford eco-boost trucks with cheap 91 gas in California versus good 93 gas from the East Coast. It was a noticeable difference in those two points. Let alone 5-6 points if you can get 93 versus 87. It was as significant as 2 to 3 tenths from the 0 to 60 up till like up to/over a half second in a quarter mile. remember that was just a difference from 91 to 93… These trucks are smart enough to instantly read the fuel and all the acting and retard the timing anytime I see that nation specially depending on if you’ve got crappy fuel winter blend is going to be worse than summer fuel anyways, there’s probably a considerable amount of performance to be gained in that Chevy by running premium fuel and adding an octane booster. Now mind you if you do the same thing in the Ford I believe the Ford truck is still gonna be faster I’m just trying to give you some tips on how to make your Chevy run better if that’s what you’re after. winter fuel 87 octane is probably the worst thing you can run in that truck with a turbo it probably detonates so early in making power that I love to see what it makes on the Dino versus what it’s advertised right now. I’m actually considerably under powered right now.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow no shit That makes sense maybe I’ll make a video of running the truck like that cool idea

  • @stephanouellet3673
    @stephanouellet3673 ปีที่แล้ว

    I goes today to racetrack with my new Silverado 23 2.7 with just 3400km. 1.98@60' 7.63@71.50MPH and 15.08@90.32MPH with 1617DA

  • @jjames_1770
    @jjames_1770 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Try the locked diff on the ford when in two wheel drive and launching, bet it would have done better on that run.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      His tires are pretty beat but yea he’s definitely quicker every which way

  • @wrotenwasp
    @wrotenwasp ปีที่แล้ว +2

    THat's cruisin for a heavy ass tank and a 4 Cyl. I have a 05 Impala SS with the dinosaur pushrod 3.8 iron block/iron heads , antiquated Eaton M90 Gen 3 supercharger with a 3.5" pulley, it only weighs 3600 pounds and it does 8.70s at 81mph in the 1/8th. My 96 standard cab, 2WD silverado with the old vortec 350 does low 7s 0-60, probably not as quick as this 4 cyl turbo.

  • @derekaldrich330
    @derekaldrich330 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the Chevy 2.7 is anything like Ford's EB engines, the ECU will definitely retard the timing with 87 octane.

  • @kona6451
    @kona6451 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dang I went and took a shower in the time it took that to get to 60.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha yea man she’s definitely not an animal

  • @Lorde360
    @Lorde360 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you guys test with 91 octane and see if it gets faster.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      I can do that I’ll toss that in the next video

  • @RW-zh7kl
    @RW-zh7kl ปีที่แล้ว

    Neither of these trucks in the video seem to launch as well as my 19 F150 2.7 does

  • @10rninjariderzx
    @10rninjariderzx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 2.7 gm is not bad

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Really happy with it not power monster but tows no problem

  • @dwaynesurratt
    @dwaynesurratt ปีที่แล้ว

    My 1 wheel drive 2.7 ecoboost ran a 9.80 1/8 mile and a 14.88@ 96 mph

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yea the ecoboosts are quick for what they are

  • @Shipmenty
    @Shipmenty 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yeah fords the fastest for sure my g

  • @ARAM619s
    @ARAM619s 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Awesome video! I have a 2.7 silverado also... im wondering how much better adding an straight thru exhaust and a kn air filter will do? Stock exhaust is really restrictive.

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh that would absolutely wake it up

    • @yolosolonorthwest6282
      @yolosolonorthwest6282 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do a video on with a dyno run with 0-60 times

    • @1964summit
      @1964summit ปีที่แล้ว

      straight exhaust will sound horrible so leave it stock or add a dynomax turbo muffler.

    • @JKZ103
      @JKZ103 ปีที่แล้ว

      Before you spend your money on that stuff get a tune. Best hp for dollar. You are nowhere near the limits of your stock exhaust right now. I promise

    • @GodDid94
      @GodDid94 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same. I’m curious on ways to improve performance.

  • @lylewheeler8915
    @lylewheeler8915 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ford owns

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      The eco boosts are quick for what they are my 5.3 truck had a hard time with em too

  • @SuspenseESCAPEremastered
    @SuspenseESCAPEremastered 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    As usual, the Ford is faster.

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We’ll obviously the 6 cylinder was gonna beat the lil 4 ha but yea in my 5.3 truck I had a hard time with both eco boost trucks

    • @mattwagner8965
      @mattwagner8965 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@dragracer455 that's cuz the 5.3 is slow either Ecoboost engine gapplesauces that thing

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mattwagner8965 I got a buddy who is supposed to be picking up a new eco boost so hopefully we can have more fun with those trucks

    • @joecobra4905
      @joecobra4905 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I beat my brother in laws 2018 denali 6.2 with my stx 2.7. Those engines are no joke.

    • @WoodLox
      @WoodLox ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mattwagner8965 5.3 will easy 400k with maintenance doing truck things

  • @chrisgee7668
    @chrisgee7668 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I never run anything less than 93 in my 22 2.7 Silverado.

  • @brenthass5876
    @brenthass5876 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Which big block engine was in the 91 Chevy pickup?

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      454

    • @kirbyfrost9082
      @kirbyfrost9082 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A peanut head 454, very poor flowing heads.

  • @Mark-xw4ek
    @Mark-xw4ek 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    @716CarGuys Will you keep us posted if you find a tune for the 2.7l turbo 4 cylinder Silverado??

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely!!!! I wanna do a compare and contrast with different tunes

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Absolutely!!!! I wanna do a compare and contrast with different tunes

  • @williamsteelejr1534
    @williamsteelejr1534 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Use 50% 91 or 93 octane and 50% ethanol.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      Really I’ll try that

    • @williamsteelejr1534
      @williamsteelejr1534 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@716carguys4 I notice using ethanol the reaction time is better.

  • @almayberry538
    @almayberry538 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I won't buy a little 4 banger in a full size truck.

  • @williamsteelejr1534
    @williamsteelejr1534 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ford trucks have a much more aggressive tune, Chevrolet is holding back.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      In wouldn’t kno I’ve thought about playing with the tune but I still don’t think this would take down an eco boost

  • @johns818
    @johns818 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why are you doing 0 to 60s with 3 people in the truck? smh

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      I dunno 🤷🏼

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      Just having fun with my truck when I first got it but your right ha

  • @williamstout6378
    @williamstout6378 ปีที่แล้ว

    😅he doesnt sa y it but the chevy is 2 wheel drive, im not a ford guy but the 2.7 is impressive.

  • @robertschwark8
    @robertschwark8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've had a 2018 f150 2.7 Ecoboost and now a 2020 3.5 Ecoboost and you really should use 91 octane or higher turbos do not like cheap gas also you should get better gas mileage

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m definitely gonna run 93 when I do the track video I’ve been seeing a lot of people say that

  • @dankruger2890
    @dankruger2890 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    turbo engines are the only way to go

  • @privilegedwhitemale306
    @privilegedwhitemale306 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You didn't take Stabilitrak off

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I usually do I’m pretty sure I did in the vid

  • @gnd111
    @gnd111 ปีที่แล้ว

    My stock 2001, 5.3 4x4 double cab ran 10.2...lol

  • @nelsonvanvickle8862
    @nelsonvanvickle8862 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just a grippier set of tires and a KN drop in filter would make a noticeable difference. I’m pretty sure the 2WD version with its lower curb weight puts down better 0-60 times. There is a video of a guy running a 6.4 sec in a 2WD 2.7t

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Omg that’s crazy this is my daily so I probably won’t mess with it to much

  • @Fleen5027
    @Fleen5027 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well I have a 2021 RAM TRX so yeah no need for me to run an 8th mile. I was at a red-light yesterday on niagara falls Blvd and this kid wanted to race me " I don't want to embarrass you in front of your girlfriend"

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s always worth it to 8th or quarter

    • @edpenkalski8937
      @edpenkalski8937 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hope you showed the kid Mopar or car is a real life choice lol

    • @okiedokie3845
      @okiedokie3845 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TRX is no joke. Didn't realize that's what I was next to and was not happy reading the tailgate before I figured it out.

    • @edpenkalski8937
      @edpenkalski8937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@okiedokie3845 it happens to the best of us .... You should see the looks I get when people realize my pt cruiser has a 58 mm snail on it ... Usually at the next light if they catch up the idiots ask how I got an LS engine in it and I'm like it's the 2.4 liter the car came with ....

    • @edpenkalski8937
      @edpenkalski8937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I got walked by an Audi allroad with twin 74 Borg's on it ..y wife loved it laughing at me like I guess you're not the only one who adds boost and fuel to station wagons lol 🤣😆

  • @fl_atv_riders4455
    @fl_atv_riders4455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The 2.7 ford on paper has way more power then the chevy 2.7 but that's not the competition for the gm 2.7 ford's 3.3 na v6 is technically its competition. The 5.3 is the competition for fors 2.7.

  • @Michael.j130
    @Michael.j130 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you want fast for GM buy the 6.2 both the 5.3 and the 2.7 are decent motors but neither one are fast

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree with that they get out of there own way but that’s about it

  • @thegonz7833
    @thegonz7833 ปีที่แล้ว

    GM is selling the slowest of trucks,that just kills me,thanks Mary Barra.

  • @Dylan-tk1nf
    @Dylan-tk1nf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My truck runs 8.1 at 88 mph with e85 in it I'd love to try and find a srt10 truck to race

  • @GyroPyro121212
    @GyroPyro121212 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Definitely a 1/4 tank of 93 with nothing but yourself in the cab would give you your best results from 0-60 but it will definitely not beat the 2.7 Ecoboost no matter what. The torque difference is too much to overcome.

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh yea I know that now I figured but I had to try ha

    • @SirtubalotTX
      @SirtubalotTX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The 'refresh' Silverado 2022 2.7t is rated at 420 ft/lb torque so it appears there is much overhead in the conservative, stock tune so I wouldn't say that. It will be interesting to see how tuning develops for this motor.
      No hate on Fords 2.7t v6 but Chevy has done something interesting here. Good thing we have it as an option until the lifter issues get ironed out for the 5.3 and 6.2

    • @GyroPyro121212
      @GyroPyro121212 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@SirtubalotTX We’ll see how it goes. 420-430 lb-ft (claimed) at 1,500 rpm from a 4 cylinder is impressive. But the 2.7 Ecoboost in a supercrew can consistently pull 5.9 seconds 0-60. That’s a tough number to beat. Plus, the 2.7 Ecoboost has had the same hp/torque since 2018. It’s only a matter of time before for upgrades it again.

    • @SirtubalotTX
      @SirtubalotTX 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@GyroPyro121212 Truth be told and if I ever got an F150, and wasn't going to keep it stock, it would be the 5.0. A properly boosted Coyote is very hard to beat by anything.

    • @GyroPyro121212
      @GyroPyro121212 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SirtubalotTX No doubt. I got the 2.7 because it was a leftover and I got a great deal on it. I wanted a 5.0 but I couldn’t pass it up. I fell in love with it after that. But a boosted 5.0 is a force to be reckoned with.

  • @ryanarnold4790
    @ryanarnold4790 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The ford is aluminum weighs 700lbs less than Chevy

  • @jasonmartin9393
    @jasonmartin9393 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If it was gear higher it would probably do lot better like if it was a 5speed or 6speed manual transmission. Would be good I bet that Chevy thow pulling a load it would go faster then the ford pulling a trailer

    • @JKZ103
      @JKZ103 ปีที่แล้ว

      It would not. The i4 is a cool little budget motor but it just can't hang with the EcoBoost's. I am a lifelong gm guy that has 3 in the driveway and daily a 3.5 eb. If you haven't driven one it's hard to explain. But them both pulling trailers you would get the same results. Maybe a fbo tuned i4 vs a bone stock 2.7 ford. Then it would have a chance.

  • @joshgessinger4509
    @joshgessinger4509 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ford truck is lighter than Chevy plus more HP not surprised.

  • @bajaboy27
    @bajaboy27 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1/8 mile? Lololololols! That's like 300 feet

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      More like 660 feet…. but yea racing these two trucks to the quarter would have made a big difference 🙄

    • @bajaboy27
      @bajaboy27 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@716carguys4 couldn't help to notice how much heavier the Silverado looks compared to the Ford. Also Chevy needs to step up their game, Ford has been taking them out for many years now, it's beginning to look embarrassing. 😭

  • @ppvracing5597
    @ppvracing5597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't have a draggy but at Empire my 2007 Escalade went like 9.8 in the 1/8 I believe
    (I'll have to find the time slip)
    So I'm impressed with the lil 4 banger, and now a lil scared to run one 😂

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Damn that’s quick for an Escalade tho ha

    • @Clutch_Kick187
      @Clutch_Kick187 ปีที่แล้ว

      oh bullshit.. Unless you have a built motor with cam and heads, or nitrous, that escalade takes over 7sec to get to 60mph.. Lets not get off our feet.. A stock 07 escalade doesn't even make 300whp..

    • @ppvracing5597
      @ppvracing5597 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Clutch_Kick187 Wrong

    • @chadbullock6326
      @chadbullock6326 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Clutch_Kick187 07 was the first year if the 6.2 like 400hp stock

    • @codymartin6704
      @codymartin6704 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Clutch_Kick187 8th mile not quarter.. It's not very fast

  • @carribboy.7572
    @carribboy.7572 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    u know racing with the windows down leads to drag....

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the first run windows were up but just messing around doing 8th mile pulls im not seeing it messing with the ETs that bad

  • @user-tb7rn1il3q
    @user-tb7rn1il3q ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The updated GM 2.7 is faster since it has more low end torque. It’s an underrated engine.

    • @02hreblue30
      @02hreblue30 ปีที่แล้ว

      simply more boost. zero other changes.

  • @alicepooper8562
    @alicepooper8562 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been running 94 octane in my 2021 f150 with the 2.7 ecoboost it feels a lot quicker. Try running high octane in the chevy 2.7 you will notice a big difference

    • @patriot101101
      @patriot101101 ปีที่แล้ว

      Use Hp tuners on this truck and it will fly after you get it tuned right.

  • @mcinteer19
    @mcinteer19 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1/8 mile? That’s not a drag race! At least do a 1/4 or better yet 1 kilometer.
    2020 F150 2.7, and I’ll take you in the 1/4!

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Racing these trucks in a quarter would make no difference man

  • @dankruger2890
    @dankruger2890 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    just got a 22' LT 2.7 and it would probably keep up with the ford now that they made the redesigned 2.7 chevy @ 420tq

  • @pauldonnelly6691
    @pauldonnelly6691 ปีที่แล้ว

    Try take your air filter out and race again see

  • @philipjohnson882
    @philipjohnson882 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Try with the new 2.7 from gm. 430ft lbs torque

    • @dragracer455
      @dragracer455 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s what this truck is

    • @02hreblue30
      @02hreblue30 ปีที่แล้ว

      simply has more boost. thats it

    • @02hreblue30
      @02hreblue30 ปีที่แล้ว

      F150 is lighter also

  • @GeorgeL.3
    @GeorgeL.3 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The GM2.7 is a turd for sure

  • @brianfisher2446
    @brianfisher2446 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ford Power!!! Chevy is heavy and gutless.

  • @thedon5172
    @thedon5172 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Appreciate the shoutout once again bro. Like he said check out Rhinos and aliens podcast, and give us feedback on if you like the podcast or not all criticism is good criticism.
    th-cam.com/users/RhinosandAliens

  • @jerrythor290
    @jerrythor290 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ls v8 is unkillable, that 2.7 prob die after towing 8k lbs for 2 years

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t tow with the truck that often and time will tell if these motors are junk or good

  • @bigcartoonyIIV
    @bigcartoonyIIV 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One main question did the chevy win?

    • @mattwagner8965
      @mattwagner8965 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Of course not Ford stands for first on race day

  • @Bark3rd
    @Bark3rd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you lost me at 1/8 mile....

  • @jimmycline4778
    @jimmycline4778 ปีที่แล้ว

    My Corollas touch screen is bigger than this silverados!

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cool you still drive a Corolla……

  • @thegonz7833
    @thegonz7833 ปีที่แล้ว

    SAF

  • @wafflesmartano
    @wafflesmartano ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Drag racing trucks is just silly.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Silly….maybe……fun yes

  • @thermionic8530
    @thermionic8530 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why 1/8th mile? Do 1/4 mile times and mph.

    • @716carguys4
      @716carguys4  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No point the 2.7 Chevy isn’t gonna run down the v6 be worth it for the times tho