@@greenrangeralex if anything, it would be a neat idea to merge Totally Spies and PPG imo. But I agree leave PPG alone, the script was SO cringe and just terrible.
The iCarly revival actually did a decent job at updating the show for a modern audience. You can really see how much the actors and characters have grown, while having their wardrobes be updated, and being allowed to swear now.
technically no. updating the show for a modern audience in this video was used to imply that the show didn't change the age group. that's what gossip girl did, they still mostly cater to teenagers so they had to make the story appealing to the modern audience of the same age group. while iCarly caters to the same people it was made for back then. they have a natural flow of simply growing up, as if show didn't end. it's not updating, it's continuing.
@@muunprince1992 Thanks for more suggestions. 👌🏻 I’m really loving all the Y2K obsession/content lately because I’m reliving my childhood/tween years and remembering soooo many things I had forgotten. In a decade or two we’ll be obsessed with 2010’s and I’ll relive my high school moments lol. Moving past a decade/era and being able to reflect back on it like this is really interesting and the first time I’ve been able to experience that as I just turned 25 so that makes me excited for life in general because I’ll be able to experience this weird fond nostalgia more!
remakes are extremely unnecessary because it's just telling the same story all over again BUT reboots are 100% allowed to have lots of changes, that's on its definition. If it's bad it's bad, but not solely because of the changes. Also animated series reboots are doing way better than the live action ones.
One of my favorite examples of a reboot/remake is the Netflix One Day at a Time. It took the concept of the original and modernized it in a really fun way
@@mightybitchy it has 99% on rotten tomatoes and 8.2 on IMDb. You call that a flop? I know those score are not a definitive proof of anything but the audience seemed to like it just there wasnt enough audience for it.
I despise blatant remakes. It seems like nothing is ever truly original anymore so I don't blame people for taking inspiration from others for their work, but remaking a show or movie only a decade later seems like an uninspired cash-grab.
@@sageo7618 honestly if they remade things that needed to be remade, like concepts that have potential but were poorly executed, maybe id be okay with it. but to remake things that were loved the first time around, and make the remake worse is ridiculous and unnecessary
I hate this trend so much. It’s nostalgia bait and a cash grab, and actual, original stories are failing and being pushed to the side because they’re often being set up to fail. It’s BS and sabotages not only writers that are trying to put original works out there, but sabotages originality.
Couldn't agree more. I can't help thinking that most of the reboots in particular are going to age horribly Edit: meant to say remakes, but it's valid in the case of some reboots as well
Honestly the only times when I don’t have a problem with this is when ppl that originally on it are involved and genuinely wanna do it bc they love that piece of media (like icarly, gossip girl or Percy Jackson) or when it’s a creative reimagining like all the ones from the 90’s and early 2000’s. The ones I hate the most are remakes and disingenuous adaptations
Fr, the reason I stay away from cinema for the past 2 years because of these remakes, adaptation, prequels and such. But, y'all gonna hate me for saying this, I actually want more Batman film 🙂
@@nananoodle5020 It kinda was, in the first movie it actually felt like you were looking at real high school students and the average American high school by doing such a great job with the slang, fashion, drama and conflict. You look at the second movie and it’s like some corny forgettable Disney movie of high school with no real lesson to learn.
What drives me crazy is that they could've made Mean Girls 2 into a sequel, not a reboot. I guess they couldn't have made a sequel following the same characters from the original though, since Lindsey Lohan was going through a lot of emotional issues in the late 2000s/early 2010s and probably wouldn't be in the right state of mind to play Cady at that moment.
Retelling of old stories is very common in theater. In fact, most dramatic stories could find roots in ancient fables. This is where tropes come from. Even Shakespeare, the most performed and adapted English author, was taking notes from Ancient Greek dramas like Oedipus Rex when he wrote Hamlet (which definitely is the basis for The Lion King). The three witches of M*cbeth are harkening to the fates in Greek tragedy.
Some video ideas, if you up to it: 1.) The power a trench coach 2.) A prediction video of where you think fashion will end up in 30 years 3.) How clothing and fashion affects the mood and tone in television and cinema 4.) Iconic characters and how their outfits reflect their personalities 5.) Vintage Fashion vs. Modern Fashion 6.)Most iconic red carpet looks 7.) Evolution and break down of old Hollywood 8.)Movies with the most beautiful cinematography 9.)History of luxury brand names 10.) The golden age of Disney Channel shows
i would love to see an analysis of what made the doctor who revival so successful....its going on its 17th year and it would be so interesting to learn about what made that possible
I prefer retellings and reimaginings instead of reboots and remakes. Of course, it depends on each film, but i generally love adaptations of classic literature. And i almost always hate revivals. And i always ignore spinoffs and usually stop watching the main show after the spinoff launches because i feel forced to watch the spinoff to understand references, and i refuse to forcibly watch something.
I think the whole revival/reboot/remake/etc thing CAN work if the original work didn't fullfill it's original purpose or the creators have something new/better to say with this world and characters, so it's not all bad, like Rocko's Modern Life's special Static Cling. But recently it's so obvious that Corporate is so desperate to cash in that they end up being souless and oversaturated. Sometimes you end up with something so bizarre like The Banana Splits Movie though which may be one of the weirdest movies of the past decade.
I see any comic book movie as an adaptation but it can be more than one thing as in an adaptation and a sequel, or an adaptation and a spin off, etc. A lot of the time these comic book movies are taking bits and pieces from different stories so even that could be described as loosely inspired.
i know there´s been some really good remakes, reboots, revivals etc but im tired lmao. thats why i appreciate much more original stories (sex education, the good place, succession, i may destroy you, etc)
thank you for this!! i wish this video existed when the chilling adventures of sabrina was announced and everyone kept calling it a reboot/remake (and being upset it wasn’t the goofy sitcom they grew up with) when it was really a reimagining. i think had it been referred to as what it really was people would’ve warmed up to it sooner
Of all these, I had a tough time with the reboot of charmed, poor chemistry, that playful sister vibes that was enjoyed in the original was one of the reasons that hooked me into it in the first place.
Omg this was an excellent video!!! Entertaining, informative, analytic - loved!! Love your style analyses but I could watch content like this for hours.
I love crossovers as heck. The Chicago franchise crossed over Fire, PD, and Med. Me, my mom, and sister were literally screaming at how well the plot was made and the twist and turns. If you want to watch it, it's called "Chicago Infection".
I have to agree with most comments here in the threads: Winx production should have been more thoughtful of The Winx storyline. In other words, they needed more time to create a more believable and updated version of the script (plotline) and allow the characters to develop without adding stupid over-done cliches. Also, when I heard about Charmed getting a reboot I told everyone 'It going to be cancelled very early. I rather remember the original ending as it is' So when it was cancelled after three seasons... well, Hollywood and CW should have known better.
Cobra Kai is a fantastic continuation of the Karate Kid series - and does so in a way that subverts expectations by making Johnny more nuanced and wanting to be a better man.
oh thank you! I was so confused when I found out that Gossip Girl wasn't a reboot because everyone (including media outlets) were calling it a one!! Also RIP Katy Keene, I miss u already
I feel like a lot of people hate on reboots/remakes but I think that some of them are just supposed to refresh movies and present old classics to new audiences. I do agree that some of them are definitely cash grabs leaning on peoples noglasta (I don’t know how to spell that also I’m looking at you wins saga and beauty and the beast remakes) but please appreciate actually good reboots and I think a-lot of people say that they are unimaginative but I think sometimes people have creative ideas to add to old Shows/movies so don’t hate please!
7:17 Oh no! That Avengers is actually not a version of the Marvel Avengers. That Avengers is an adaptation of “The Avengers” the 1960 British TV show about spy’s. That TV show is the reason why in the UK The Avengers is actually called Avengers Assemble.
WAIT-WAIT-WAIT...... family matters was a spin off of Perfect Strangers?????? I didn't know that and I watched both! (Though admittedly, less Perfect Strangers since I was young and family Matters appealed younger (I think). Also... "In a way" "Friends" was sort of a spin off of "Mad about You" since Phoebe's twin sister Ursula was a character in that show. And in 1 ep, Paul & Jamie (main characters of that show) mistake Phoebe for Ursula and Phoebe's very confused and it's kind of fun to know it's all in the same universe. I think Kramer from Seinfeld also showed up as his character in that show.
Okay but the Carrie Diaries prequel to Sex and the City is a genuinely a good teen show if you forget that it's a prequel cause there definitely are some plot holes. Worth the watch!
Thea, named of course Dorothea, went to a club at a halloween event. She took her roomates red shoes for her (loosely inspired) costume of Little Red Ridding Hood. She also took a plushie as a wolf. At the club, she finds a school friend, she recognizes the shoes, and says it's very odd Roomie lend them, but alas! Oh, and that dog? It's supposed to be a wolf. Oh, a doggie like that could never be a wolf, it looks like hes called Sparky or Toto and loves belly rubs. She leaves. The night goes on. Thea finds a dude dress as a scarecrow, who spills a drink all over her. Thea then takes off the over dress and is left with her white petty coat and blue undershirt. She's yelling at Scarecrow Guy outside of the bathrooms, telling him he has to be more carefull when swimming truth the crowd and to thibk a little, gosh, what else could have happened if he had two drinks and a mask on and the club is full, huh?? Then, Guy dress as a Lion and guy dress and a Robot ask whats happening, they recognize her from uni. She explains. Robot offers Thea his jacket (blue and white of course). Mrs Friend of Roomie walks out of the bathroom and SEES THEA WEARING HIS RECENTLY EX-ED JACKET. She walks up to Thea, "I'm gonna tell Roomie you ruinnedher shoes". Thea is devastated. She HAS to get them clean and home safe ASAP. She trips her way out the club to find a laundromat. She is followed by the guys, and they all try to find a darn laundromat. Lion says to better just get them home safe, because the streets are dangerous and scary. Scarecrow is trying to make up for the incident so he plans how to find a laundromat and get home before sunrise, why?? Because Robot guy is trying to distract Roomie's friend, dancing with her, telling her stuff about getting back together and all. That SHOULD work for at least two hours. It's taking Lion, Scarecrow, Thea and Toto a looong time to find Oz's Laundromat, the closest 24 hours laundromat. Drunkily they stare at the screen of a phone telling them where to go. Follow the Yellow Line, they mutter, to not get distracted. thry start chanting "FOLLOW THE YELLOW LINE" and skipping in the right direction. They arrive and Ozzie himself helps them to clean up the gosh darn shoes, and while they wait for some process to happen, Robot (not so drunk as the rest and weirded out by faking feelings with mrs Roomies Friend) arrives on an uber. Ozzie gives everyone great life advice that can only work when you are drunk in halloween, they all learn valuable lessons. DING!! It's shoe time. Robot said mrs roomie friend had low battery on her phone and was taking a good ol fashioned cab. They HAD to hurry. But wait! Look at the time!? It's soooo late and there Are No More Ubers! We can walk and get to a Main Avenue and get a cab there (queue to some instances of hardships like angsty teenagers throwing apples from some window sill because fuck halloween and more, that are more terrible because they are drunk and not thinking straight) until they get a cab and arrive home and get the shoes in place. Next day, Robot has a heart to heart talk with Roomies Friend, Lion takes Taekwondo as a self defense thing and Scarecrow... idk something. Thea wakes up with a terrible hangover, and hazey memories of what had happened before she woke up.
NBC did a Wizard of Oz reimagining tv show called Emerald City that was actually pretty good and I loved that the leading lady wasn’t white. I’m usually against classics being touched at all, but sometimes they turn out great.
The juxtaposition of The Avengers 1998 and The Avengers 2012 makes it look like The Avengers 2012 was a remake of Avengers 1998 when they are both totally different properties. The Avengers 1998 was a movie adaptation of the 1960s BBC series The Avengers while The Avengers 2012 was of course adapted from Marvel Comics. Great video though!
I would love to see an adaptation of the original Sweet Valley High books. While there was a tv show made back in the 90s, I feel it would be cool to see how it could be made to fit modern audiences, especially considering how bizarre it gets in the later books (werewolves, vampires, french royalty despite FRANCE, murder, romance drama, etc.). Like how would you translate some of that? I would love to see it.
I don’t think I would mind all the reboots/revivals/remakes so much if they were actually good and meant something, but they rarely are so I can’t see the point. Most end up just feeling like a cash grab and entirely unnecessary - I’d understand a bit more if fans were really pushing for it but I think the general consensus is most shows don’t need to be brought back for whatever reason. It hurts my heart that future generations might look back and recall popular shows as their meh reboots instead of the originals (gossip girl and winx off the top of my head)
Thank you very much for explaining this, people never understand when I explain reboot, revivals and remakes, so I will started to send this video as my explanation 😌😌
You can see it by my profile pic, but: The she-ra reboot (or it is more of a reimagining) . It's completely different with the same characters and yet still is really really good! It's not a nostalgia cash grab, it it is it's own amazing cartoon!!
Can you do videos talking about current high fashion trends brands fashion shows and looks that you would put together. Also possibly talk about past high fashion brands history such as balenciaga, Ann Taylor halsted, Versace ect. Love your channel! ❤️❤️ You are amazing
A very, very difficult topic. For adaptations: I'm all for doing an adaptation of a literature classic every couple of decades so that the Jane Austen/Shakespeare/Dickens etc. classics are made known to younger audiences who would probably never watch an adaptation that's 70 years old. Sometimes though, it doesn't work. For me, the Little Women version from the 90s with Winona Ryder is the best one. The one with Emma Watson from a few years back simply didn't work out for me. As for something like reboots and remakes and such... For example, I never understood why there had to be new Spider Man movies only a couple of years after the Tobey Maguire ones. To this day, I haven't seen the Andrew Garfield one(s?) because I see no sense in that. I think that not enough years have passed to justify doing something like that. Now, of course, Marvel has to do things like new Spider Man movies etc. to fit all of their huge universe together (which I find very, very tiring by now). Although some Disney live actions were okay, mostly, they were disappointing. Maleficent was a very good idea, and even fixed some plot holes (like, let's take Aurora back to her parents out of hiding on the day of the curse instead of, oh, let's wait a day to see if we can trick the curse and keep the girl hidden until that time). Mostly though, they're weak and colourless, and very uninspired, but Disney knows people will watch them anyway, so why put any effort into this. The worst of all this (and I really don't know what to call what Disney is doing there) is Star Wars. George Lucas has sold his creation to the devil with mouse ears, and they only make money out of it while pretending to care about the franchise (maybe some do, but they're still doing a shit job of it; 90 % of fanfiction is way better). And here, too, the sad thing is, fans will watch it, no matter how bad it is. They will complain about it afterwards, but they will still watch it. I'm no exception to that, mostly. I've waited twenty years for the Obi-Wan Kenobi series. It wasn't bad, but could have been better, but, of course, I still watched it (and was ridiculously grateful that they had Qui-Gon appear at the end for exactly one minute; I really counted on them ignoring him completely). What I hate though is all the series popping up out of the ground like mushrooms. Oh, there's a character that's been on screen for five minutes: Let's give them a spinoff of their own, we're doing something good for the fans there, they want to know more about this universe. No, Disney, you're doing something good for your purse. Although the Mandalorian is a great show, and something new in the Star Wars verse that actually worked, otherwise, I don't want to see the distant cousin of a minor character's best friend get their own show. I'm not interested in that, and I also want to have some kind of connection to the prequels or originals, thank you very much. And they also could have been a little bit more creative with doing the Sequel trilogy. It's basically the complete same story as the original series, including, oh, Rey grows up on a *sand* planet. And the absolute worst is that now that Disney owns Star Wars, they are so arrogant and presumptuous to simply declare decades of books etc. that told what happened after Episode Six as non-canon, just like that. They could have incorporated these tons of very good, intricate ideas (doing the same with the Jedi apprentice series about Obi-Wan's apprenticeship, but in turn, they never offered any alternative, simply declared it non-canon like bad fanwork or something), instead of simply creating a story that copies the originals. I hate this. So. Now, I've ranted enough, but I had to get this off my chest^^
Ofc companies do these for money but I also think it became so hard for them to make a fun movie without being made fun of and criticized , everyone searches and analyzes what’s wrong with the movies and series a]that to make a reboot is kinda safer if you do it right , for example I don’t think anyone would like Wild child if it came out today
The Hobbit was written before the Lord of the Rings. Yes it was a greedy cash crab by Peter Jackson since he took a 300 page book and made it into three movies while randomly throwing in things Tolkien never wrote; like whole characters and storylines,and fan service references to his other “Tolkien “ movies, but canonically it is first. I don’t know if you meant this, but you seemed to imply that the Hobbit was created from whole cloth by Jackson and not the epic book it is.
Hey, I had watched your analyzing Clueless outfits video and fell in love with these types of videos that I watched all of them from your channel. I wanted to ask if you could do an analyzing Gossip Girl outfits video because I love the fashion in the show and also I think it would make a great video idea. Thank you
I think the problem is, most sequels/reboots/adaptations, etc, are from movies/books/shows, etc, that were initially received (more than) well, which means everybody is comparing the sequel/reboot/adaptation, etc, to the original, and it usually doesn't live up to that standard. It's practically impossible to view it as it's own thing, separate from the original.
Hang on, just a note in the reboot section the British movie the Avengers has nothing to do with Marvels Avengers. However the British movie avengers is a reboot off a earlier 1960 (or 70) tv show called the avengers
This has been happening a lot in Bollywood today there are only remakes and biopics no original movies don't let this trend catch up in Hollywood or your industries creativity will also die.
The reboot I respect is the MCU. A lot of it was more of an adaptation, because it was working on superheros that had not been done in movies very recently. I am not sure if Iron Man had ever had a movie adaptation before, so previous on-screen material was probably all cartoons. The Hulk was a lot more recent, with the Eric Bana movie not that long before teh MCU Incredible Hulk, butt then if I understand it right (never having properly sat and watched TIH) the MCU movie is not the story of how Bruce first became the Hulk, but a story of what happens to him some time after. Captain America has had a fair few versions, and I think there was one in the 90s, but the MCU started with a period piece on Steve's origin (framed in modern day sequences at start and end), and then going into Cap's iconic "Man Out Of Time" shtick. But Marvel!Thor didn't have much outside cartoons, Black Widow even less, Hawkeye even less than that. These are characters who may have popped up in one episode in another superhero's show, but Avengers took them and made the huge. And the MCU kept doing that, bringing previously less adapted heroes, (and digging up more recent revived characters and giving us them onscreen in such a good way it made the actor's carreer - yes I am talking about Bucky Barnes, who had been revived in the comics only 6-7 years prior to Captain America, but the plot of "The First Avenger" was tailored to bring in the Winter Soldier, since Bucky's fall was a huge emotional point of the story, and that plot is a Winter Soldier ret-con, I believe). Seriously, I cannot express how I love the MCU for making Bucky such a hugely famous character, and he's going to be in the up-coming Thunderbolts too, where I hope he, Yelena and Alexi have a real Russian thing going. But the notable thing I feel about the MCU is how it managed to get in characters whose film rights were... difficult, into the movies. First was the deal for the Maximoff twins, which yeah sad it involved killing off Pietro, but then they were able to play on that in WandaVision, but the big one? Spider-Man. The thing is, they did not do yet another remake - didn't go retelling Peter's origin story because we meet Peter through the lense of Tony Stark. But there were, in the Spider-Man movies themselves, indications that MCU!Peter went through the same general events - in NWH Peter outright says he got bitten by a spider, in Homecoming May is seen wearing rings on a chain around her neck and Peter says they've had a hard time in the last year, in FFH Peter has a suitcase with Ben Parker's initials on it, and going back to NWH, Peter does not react oddly when the other two Peters mention Uncle Ben. That is the other big point about the MCU Spider-Man - it made the previous versions of Spider-Man canon - somewhere out in the canon MCU multiverse, the other two Spider-Man franchises exist. So when it comes to reboots and remakes, I effin' adore the MCU Spider-Man because it validated both previous Spider-Mans, even to the point where, when Peter 3 (Andrew Garfield) is talking himself down, Peter 1 (Tobey McGuire) says "No! You're amazing!", validating the ASM movies. Can you tell I loved NWH?
![โรงเรียนดัดสันดาน นักเรียนเถื่อน..!! [โรงเรียนไดเม่]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vRKPeXn4Fl4/mqdefault.jpg)
One thing that 💯% should have stayed in the production drafts… the live-action Winx 🥴
🦶🦶🦶
definitely
i hope they didn't release the powerpuff girls one lol
@@greenrangeralex the pilot is being reworked.
@@greenrangeralex if anything, it would be a neat idea to merge Totally Spies and PPG imo. But I agree leave PPG alone, the script was SO cringe and just terrible.
The iCarly revival actually did a decent job at updating the show for a modern audience. You can really see how much the actors and characters have grown, while having their wardrobes be updated, and being allowed to swear now.
technically no. updating the show for a modern audience in this video was used to imply that the show didn't change the age group. that's what gossip girl did, they still mostly cater to teenagers so they had to make the story appealing to the modern audience of the same age group. while iCarly caters to the same people it was made for back then. they have a natural flow of simply growing up, as if show didn't end. it's not updating, it's continuing.
It’s like a lot of directors have lost there creative juices why make a reboot. When you can make the next big thing
This! ♡
The studios also dictate what directors can do with their movies tho
Built in audience. They’re lazy..
Agreed! I need some original contents so baddd. I don't want no remakes.
Please do an analysis of the early 2000s Charlie’s Angels movies.
that is literally the hottest idea ever
@Isabel B. I could watch the second one at anytime and be content lol
YES
Oooooooh yes
Omggg
Modern gurlz and Mina Le are one of my go-to pop culture commentary channels 💖
Same! Also film fatale and goodytwoshoes
Both have amazing graphics and journalism integrity.
@@muunprince1992 Thanks for more suggestions. 👌🏻 I’m really loving all the Y2K obsession/content lately because I’m reliving my childhood/tween years and remembering soooo many things I had forgotten. In a decade or two we’ll be obsessed with 2010’s and I’ll relive my high school moments lol. Moving past a decade/era and being able to reflect back on it like this is really interesting and the first time I’ve been able to experience that as I just turned 25 so that makes me excited for life in general because I’ll be able to experience this weird fond nostalgia more!
Even The Take is great. They talk about tropes, stereotypes and social issues in pop culture.
@@khalilurtrahman yesss i love the take
lucy liu with my girl drew and cameroon D had the best movie reboot with Charlie’s Angels
please make a fashion analysis on hbo euphoria show outfits or ever after high outfits (im begging😩)
i recommend "negative legend"
Vouch for the euphoria outfit analysis 😭😭
EAH 🛐🛐🛐
EUPHORIA PLSS
yesss she would do such a good job on that
remakes are extremely unnecessary because it's just telling the same story all over again BUT reboots are 100% allowed to have lots of changes, that's on its definition. If it's bad it's bad, but not solely because of the changes. Also animated series reboots are doing way better than the live action ones.
I agree. I consider thé A star is born movies to be reboots. While they have the same story it’s also modern and updated to fit its current time.
I've seen good remakes. Like Love Don't Cost a Thing or The Hustle.
@@LangBellsChannel me too, I think the Cinderella remake is so pretty
One of my favorite examples of a reboot/remake is the Netflix One Day at a Time. It took the concept of the original and modernized it in a really fun way
Such a great show
Such a beautiful great show, I really want more seasons
@@mightybitchy it has 99% on rotten tomatoes and 8.2 on IMDb. You call that a flop? I know those score are not a definitive proof of anything but the audience seemed to like it just there wasnt enough audience for it.
i love that show so much
i love that show
i despise remakes. theyre usually for shows geared towards women and its like, do we not deserve new media??
I never noticed this!
Also I love your pfp and banner
I despise blatant remakes. It seems like nothing is ever truly original anymore so I don't blame people for taking inspiration from others for their work, but remaking a show or movie only a decade later seems like an uninspired cash-grab.
@@sageo7618 honestly if they remade things that needed to be remade, like concepts that have potential but were poorly executed, maybe id be okay with it. but to remake things that were loved the first time around, and make the remake worse is ridiculous and unnecessary
@@xakirax_8864 thank u!!
That’s very interesting!
Just gotta point out that the The Office is already a remake of the UK version
Ok but that intro just gives you all the feelings
Not everything needs a reboot but depending what you reboot and your execution it can be successful. And could gain a new audience too.
I want them to de-reboot The Mummy franchise. Bring back Rachel Weisz and Brendan Fraser and Rachel’s brother character!
YES!
All I need is a revival of Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide, I can't believe Nickelodeon turn down that idea.
I hate this trend so much. It’s nostalgia bait and a cash grab, and actual, original stories are failing and being pushed to the side because they’re often being set up to fail. It’s BS and sabotages not only writers that are trying to put original works out there, but sabotages originality.
I strongly agree with you!!!!
Couldn't agree more. I can't help thinking that most of the reboots in particular are going to age horribly
Edit: meant to say remakes, but it's valid in the case of some reboots as well
FACTS!!!!!
Honestly the only times when I don’t have a problem with this is when ppl that originally on it are involved and genuinely wanna do it bc they love that piece of media (like icarly, gossip girl or Percy Jackson) or when it’s a creative reimagining like all the ones from the 90’s and early 2000’s. The ones I hate the most are remakes and disingenuous adaptations
Fr, the reason I stay away from cinema for the past 2 years because of these remakes, adaptation, prequels and such. But, y'all gonna hate me for saying this, I actually want more Batman film 🙂
Idk why they felt the need to make Mean Girls 2😭
Shh🤫 Mean Girls has no sequel. Let's not acknowledge that awful "mean girls 2" as a sequel.
There’s a mean girls 2?
Honestly mean girls 2 wasn’t THAT bad. It’s just really corny.
@@nananoodle5020 It kinda was, in the first movie it actually felt like you were looking at real high school students and the average American high school by doing such a great job with the slang, fashion, drama and conflict. You look at the second movie and it’s like some corny forgettable Disney movie of high school with no real lesson to learn.
What drives me crazy is that they could've made Mean Girls 2 into a sequel, not a reboot. I guess they couldn't have made a sequel following the same characters from the original though, since Lindsey Lohan was going through a lot of emotional issues in the late 2000s/early 2010s and probably wouldn't be in the right state of mind to play Cady at that moment.
the intro is fire that gave me so much serotonin
Retelling of old stories is very common in theater. In fact, most dramatic stories could find roots in ancient fables. This is where tropes come from. Even Shakespeare, the most performed and adapted English author, was taking notes from Ancient Greek dramas like Oedipus Rex when he wrote Hamlet (which definitely is the basis for The Lion King). The three witches of M*cbeth are harkening to the fates in Greek tragedy.
Some video ideas, if you up to it:
1.) The power a trench coach
2.) A prediction video of where you think fashion will end up in 30 years
3.) How clothing and fashion affects the mood and tone in television and cinema
4.) Iconic characters and how their outfits reflect their personalities
5.) Vintage Fashion vs. Modern Fashion
6.)Most iconic red carpet looks
7.) Evolution and break down of old Hollywood
8.)Movies with the most beautiful cinematography
9.)History of luxury brand names
10.) The golden age of Disney Channel shows
i would love to see an analysis of what made the doctor who revival so successful....its going on its 17th year and it would be so interesting to learn about what made that possible
I prefer retellings and reimaginings instead of reboots and remakes. Of course, it depends on each film, but i generally love adaptations of classic literature. And i almost always hate revivals. And i always ignore spinoffs and usually stop watching the main show after the spinoff launches because i feel forced to watch the spinoff to understand references, and i refuse to forcibly watch something.
I think the whole revival/reboot/remake/etc thing CAN work if the original work didn't fullfill it's original purpose or the creators have something new/better to say with this world and characters, so it's not all bad, like Rocko's Modern Life's special Static Cling. But recently it's so obvious that Corporate is so desperate to cash in that they end up being souless and oversaturated.
Sometimes you end up with something so bizarre like The Banana Splits Movie though which may be one of the weirdest movies of the past decade.
Recently found your channel and have been binging it for the past few days! Every video is so well thought out and researched. I'm obsessed!
I love how eloquent you are. You just cover all the bases in such a crystal clear manner. Love your videos!
I see any comic book movie as an adaptation but it can be more than one thing as in an adaptation and a sequel, or an adaptation and a spin off, etc. A lot of the time these comic book movies are taking bits and pieces from different stories so even that could be described as loosely inspired.
i know there´s been some really good remakes, reboots, revivals etc but im tired lmao. thats why i appreciate much more original stories (sex education, the good place, succession, i may destroy you, etc)
yessss. Sex Education is great
this is literally a conversation I’ve been having for FOREVER THANK YOU
I love the amount of content we get at the moment💯
The Little Mermaid 2 wasn't a bad seq- Oh my gosh, I never realised how weird their faces looked!
aw I love that one! I grew up with it along with the prequel and the original
I also loved it 🥺🥺 I watched it so much
thank you for this!! i wish this video existed when the chilling adventures of sabrina was announced and everyone kept calling it a reboot/remake (and being upset it wasn’t the goofy sitcom they grew up with) when it was really a reimagining. i think had it been referred to as what it really was people would’ve warmed up to it sooner
I really love your iconic fashion moments series , and I would also love to see a fashion analysis on Rachel Green from Friends .
Of all these, I had a tough time with the reboot of charmed, poor chemistry, that playful sister vibes that was enjoyed in the original was one of the reasons that hooked me into it in the first place.
reboots are always something to be wary of bc you never know if they’ll do an amazing or horrible job of something iconic
Omg this was an excellent video!!! Entertaining, informative, analytic - loved!! Love your style analyses but I could watch content like this for hours.
PLS make a fashion analysis on that 2002 disney channel movie Get A Clue, or lizzie mcguire
I love crossovers as heck. The Chicago franchise crossed over Fire, PD, and Med. Me, my mom, and sister were literally screaming at how well the plot was made and the twist and turns. If you want to watch it, it's called "Chicago Infection".
Would do a review of the Carrie diaries as nobody’s seems to talk about it. When I first watched it I didn’t even know it was prequel.
I get SO EXCITED when I see a notification from this channel! 🥰
1:03 Adaptation
2:42 Remake
5:17 Reboot
7:59 Reimagining
9:37 Retcon
10:55 Revival
13:24 Spinoff
15:11 Crossover
16:13 The quels
Thanks so much for the timestamps, they are absolute time savers!
They have the on the video tho-
@@mafthew1813 i made this before they added their own time stamps.
@@urmom-yy7xg ohhhhh okay
Was on a ModernGurlz b!nge and was blessed with a new video ✨
omg i got so excited when you mentioned the parkers. ugh I LOVE YOU QUEEN
the intro is so comforting idk why
Ironic that I saw a reboot for Chip and Dale ad. Some things don’t need to be brought back people.
I have to agree with most comments here in the threads: Winx production should have been more thoughtful of The Winx storyline. In other words, they needed more time to create a more believable and updated version of the script (plotline) and allow the characters to develop without adding stupid over-done cliches. Also, when I heard about Charmed getting a reboot I told everyone 'It going to be cancelled very early. I rather remember the original ending as it is' So when it was cancelled after three seasons... well, Hollywood and CW should have known better.
I get so excited when I see u uploaded! Your videos are very comforting 2 me 🥰
This video is a great resource, thank you for this!
The video is great!
But I was expecting more talk about the need in remakes and adaptation, more rant on good and bad ones)
for me, i’m kind (?) of getting tired of the disney live-action adaptations and remakes :/ but there’s some of them that i really like!
Same. I really like Cinderella.. but the Lion King was hot garbage
Cobra Kai is a fantastic continuation of the Karate Kid series - and does so in a way that subverts expectations by making Johnny more nuanced and wanting to be a better man.
Exactly! I feel like it’s the only reboot that was done right and it’s so well written and such a great show.
I really enjoy your content! I look forward to your uploads ✨
I really loved the spin-off “A different world”. I loved it so much more than the OG, I still rewatch it to this day 💕
oh thank you! I was so confused when I found out that Gossip Girl wasn't a reboot because everyone (including media outlets) were calling it a one!!
Also RIP Katy Keene, I miss u already
You never mentioned Buffy and its spin off Angel! It’s a classic example of a successful spin off and they had many very well made crossovers!
She couldn't mention everything.
@@giovannigiovanni.7220 that’s obvious, still it would have been a very good example.
@@rachele___ Agreed.
I feel like a lot of people hate on reboots/remakes but I think that some of them are just supposed to refresh movies and present old classics to new audiences. I do agree that some of them are definitely cash grabs leaning on peoples noglasta (I don’t know how to spell that also I’m looking at you wins saga and beauty and the beast remakes) but please appreciate actually good reboots and I think a-lot of people say that they are unimaginative but I think sometimes people have creative ideas to add to old Shows/movies so don’t hate please!
You need to do a 2022 style prediction because your 2021 one was so accurate!
I have to say it again : I LOVE your channel so much ❤❤❤❤❤❤
So glad you started doing more frequent uploads 💖
7:17 Oh no! That Avengers is actually not a version of the Marvel Avengers. That Avengers is an adaptation of “The Avengers” the 1960 British TV show about spy’s. That TV show is the reason why in the UK The Avengers is actually called Avengers Assemble.
speaking of this you should do a video on the gossip girl reboot fashion!!
i second this!!!
WAIT-WAIT-WAIT...... family matters was a spin off of Perfect Strangers?????? I didn't know that and I watched both! (Though admittedly, less Perfect Strangers since I was young and family Matters appealed younger (I think).
Also... "In a way" "Friends" was sort of a spin off of "Mad about You" since Phoebe's twin sister Ursula was a character in that show. And in 1 ep, Paul & Jamie (main characters of that show) mistake Phoebe for Ursula and Phoebe's very confused and it's kind of fun to know it's all in the same universe. I think Kramer from Seinfeld also showed up as his character in that show.
Okay but the Carrie Diaries prequel to Sex and the City is a genuinely a good teen show if you forget that it's a prequel cause there definitely are some plot holes. Worth the watch!
Thea, named of course Dorothea, went to a club at a halloween event. She took her roomates red shoes for her (loosely inspired) costume of Little Red Ridding Hood. She also took a plushie as a wolf. At the club, she finds a school friend, she recognizes the shoes, and says it's very odd Roomie lend them, but alas! Oh, and that dog? It's supposed to be a wolf. Oh, a doggie like that could never be a wolf, it looks like hes called Sparky or Toto and loves belly rubs. She leaves. The night goes on. Thea finds a dude dress as a scarecrow, who spills a drink all over her. Thea then takes off the over dress and is left with her white petty coat and blue undershirt. She's yelling at Scarecrow Guy outside of the bathrooms, telling him he has to be more carefull when swimming truth the crowd and to thibk a little, gosh, what else could have happened if he had two drinks and a mask on and the club is full, huh?? Then, Guy dress as a Lion and guy dress and a Robot ask whats happening, they recognize her from uni. She explains. Robot offers Thea his jacket (blue and white of course). Mrs Friend of Roomie walks out of the bathroom and SEES THEA WEARING HIS RECENTLY EX-ED JACKET. She walks up to Thea, "I'm gonna tell Roomie you ruinnedher shoes". Thea is devastated. She HAS to get them clean and home safe ASAP. She trips her way out the club to find a laundromat. She is followed by the guys, and they all try to find a darn laundromat. Lion says to better just get them home safe, because the streets are dangerous and scary. Scarecrow is trying to make up for the incident so he plans how to find a laundromat and get home before sunrise, why?? Because Robot guy is trying to distract Roomie's friend, dancing with her, telling her stuff about getting back together and all. That SHOULD work for at least two hours. It's taking Lion, Scarecrow, Thea and Toto a looong time to find Oz's Laundromat, the closest 24 hours laundromat. Drunkily they stare at the screen of a phone telling them where to go. Follow the Yellow Line, they mutter, to not get distracted. thry start chanting "FOLLOW THE YELLOW LINE" and skipping in the right direction. They arrive and Ozzie himself helps them to clean up the gosh darn shoes, and while they wait for some process to happen, Robot (not so drunk as the rest and weirded out by faking feelings with mrs Roomies Friend) arrives on an uber. Ozzie gives everyone great life advice that can only work when you are drunk in halloween, they all learn valuable lessons. DING!! It's shoe time. Robot said mrs roomie friend had low battery on her phone and was taking a good ol fashioned cab. They HAD to hurry. But wait! Look at the time!? It's soooo late and there Are No More Ubers! We can walk and get to a Main Avenue and get a cab there (queue to some instances of hardships like angsty teenagers throwing apples from some window sill because fuck halloween and more, that are more terrible because they are drunk and not thinking straight) until they get a cab and arrive home and get the shoes in place. Next day, Robot has a heart to heart talk with Roomies Friend, Lion takes Taekwondo as a self defense thing and Scarecrow... idk something. Thea wakes up with a terrible hangover, and hazey memories of what had happened before she woke up.
NBC did a Wizard of Oz reimagining tv show called Emerald City that was actually pretty good and I loved that the leading lady wasn’t white. I’m usually against classics being touched at all, but sometimes they turn out great.
The juxtaposition of The Avengers 1998 and The Avengers 2012 makes it look like The Avengers 2012 was a remake of Avengers 1998 when they are both totally different properties. The Avengers 1998 was a movie adaptation of the 1960s BBC series The Avengers while The Avengers 2012 was of course adapted from Marvel Comics.
Great video though!
I would love to see an adaptation of the original Sweet Valley High books. While there was a tv show made back in the 90s, I feel it would be cool to see how it could be made to fit modern audiences, especially considering how bizarre it gets in the later books (werewolves, vampires, french royalty despite FRANCE, murder, romance drama, etc.). Like how would you translate some of that? I would love to see it.
Lmaooo I’m sorry but Ariana Grande dancing at 15:16 absolutely cracked me tf up I just had to point that out. 😂😂💀
Did not expect to see my boy Ultraman Geed show up in a Moderngurlz video, but I'm absolutely here for it
I don’t think I would mind all the reboots/revivals/remakes so much if they were actually good and meant something, but they rarely are so I can’t see the point. Most end up just feeling like a cash grab and entirely unnecessary - I’d understand a bit more if fans were really pushing for it but I think the general consensus is most shows don’t need to be brought back for whatever reason. It hurts my heart that future generations might look back and recall popular shows as their meh reboots instead of the originals (gossip girl and winx off the top of my head)
Thank you very much for explaining this, people never understand when I explain reboot, revivals and remakes, so I will started to send this video as my explanation 😌😌
This channel is saving so many lunch breaks for me, also so many good info, im in love, keep the good content ❤️❤️
That Wizard of Oz reimagining sounds dope O.o
will subtitles be available? i’d love to learn but i can’t keep track of what’s being said without reading along.
I still remember the Kim Possible and Lilo and Stitch crossover.
You can see it by my profile pic, but: The she-ra reboot (or it is more of a reimagining) . It's completely different with the same characters and yet still is really really good! It's not a nostalgia cash grab, it it is it's own amazing cartoon!!
Can you do videos talking about current high fashion trends brands fashion shows and looks that you would put together. Also possibly talk about past high fashion brands history such as balenciaga, Ann Taylor halsted, Versace ect. Love your channel! ❤️❤️ You are amazing
A very, very difficult topic. For adaptations: I'm all for doing an adaptation of a literature classic every couple of decades so that the Jane Austen/Shakespeare/Dickens etc. classics are made known to younger audiences who would probably never watch an adaptation that's 70 years old. Sometimes though, it doesn't work. For me, the Little Women version from the 90s with Winona Ryder is the best one. The one with Emma Watson from a few years back simply didn't work out for me.
As for something like reboots and remakes and such... For example, I never understood why there had to be new Spider Man movies only a couple of years after the Tobey Maguire ones. To this day, I haven't seen the Andrew Garfield one(s?) because I see no sense in that. I think that not enough years have passed to justify doing something like that. Now, of course, Marvel has to do things like new Spider Man movies etc. to fit all of their huge universe together (which I find very, very tiring by now).
Although some Disney live actions were okay, mostly, they were disappointing. Maleficent was a very good idea, and even fixed some plot holes (like, let's take Aurora back to her parents out of hiding on the day of the curse instead of, oh, let's wait a day to see if we can trick the curse and keep the girl hidden until that time). Mostly though, they're weak and colourless, and very uninspired, but Disney knows people will watch them anyway, so why put any effort into this. The worst of all this (and I really don't know what to call what Disney is doing there) is Star Wars. George Lucas has sold his creation to the devil with mouse ears, and they only make money out of it while pretending to care about the franchise (maybe some do, but they're still doing a shit job of it; 90 % of fanfiction is way better). And here, too, the sad thing is, fans will watch it, no matter how bad it is. They will complain about it afterwards, but they will still watch it. I'm no exception to that, mostly. I've waited twenty years for the Obi-Wan Kenobi series. It wasn't bad, but could have been better, but, of course, I still watched it (and was ridiculously grateful that they had Qui-Gon appear at the end for exactly one minute; I really counted on them ignoring him completely).
What I hate though is all the series popping up out of the ground like mushrooms. Oh, there's a character that's been on screen for five minutes: Let's give them a spinoff of their own, we're doing something good for the fans there, they want to know more about this universe. No, Disney, you're doing something good for your purse.
Although the Mandalorian is a great show, and something new in the Star Wars verse that actually worked, otherwise, I don't want to see the distant cousin of a minor character's best friend get their own show. I'm not interested in that, and I also want to have some kind of connection to the prequels or originals, thank you very much.
And they also could have been a little bit more creative with doing the Sequel trilogy. It's basically the complete same story as the original series, including, oh, Rey grows up on a *sand* planet.
And the absolute worst is that now that Disney owns Star Wars, they are so arrogant and presumptuous to simply declare decades of books etc. that told what happened after Episode Six as non-canon, just like that. They could have incorporated these tons of very good, intricate ideas (doing the same with the Jedi apprentice series about Obi-Wan's apprenticeship, but in turn, they never offered any alternative, simply declared it non-canon like bad fanwork or something), instead of simply creating a story that copies the originals. I hate this.
So. Now, I've ranted enough, but I had to get this off my chest^^
Ofc companies do these for money but I also think it became so hard for them to make a fun movie without being made fun of and criticized , everyone searches and analyzes what’s wrong with the movies and series a]that to make a reboot is kinda safer if you do it right , for example I don’t think anyone would like Wild child if it came out today
The Hobbit was written before the Lord of the Rings. Yes it was a greedy cash crab by Peter Jackson since he took a 300 page book and made it into three movies while randomly throwing in things Tolkien never wrote; like whole characters and storylines,and fan service references to his other “Tolkien “ movies, but canonically it is first. I don’t know if you meant this, but you seemed to imply that the Hobbit was created from whole cloth by Jackson and not the epic book it is.
Hey, I had watched your analyzing Clueless outfits video and fell in love with these types of videos that I watched all of them from your channel. I wanted to ask if you could do an analyzing Gossip Girl outfits video because I love the fashion in the show and also I think it would make a great video idea. Thank you
Love your content !
I think the problem is, most sequels/reboots/adaptations, etc, are from movies/books/shows, etc, that were initially received (more than) well, which means everybody is comparing the sequel/reboot/adaptation, etc, to the original, and it usually doesn't live up to that standard. It's practically impossible to view it as it's own thing, separate from the original.
Pls I can’t wait for you to the gossip girl reboot !!!!! Also genera+ion is a great one
please do an analysis abt the ICONIC fashion/outfits from 'scream queens" !!! :DDDD
I feel like i need a pop up quiz to memorise all the information🤩
Can you do an analysis of the Marvelous Mrs Maisel? The costuming and writing of the show are amazing.
Hang on, just a note in the reboot section the British movie the Avengers has nothing to do with Marvels Avengers. However the British movie avengers is a reboot off a earlier 1960 (or 70) tv show called the avengers
We are PRO the wiz-of-oz reimagining with drunk Dorothy!
Would love to see y'all cover the history and legacy of hollywood records
This has been happening a lot in Bollywood today there are only remakes and biopics no original movies don't let this trend catch up in Hollywood or your industries creativity will also die.
thank you soooooo much for including black sitcoms in this video, and for being inclusive in all of your videos!!
Please do an outfit analysis of the original “The Craft” 🥺
I love your channel so much
I absolutely love your channel
young sheldon is such a good spin off!!! i never saw big bang theory because i hated the humour but young sheldon is so funny
Thank u so much for this video, very informative!
can you please do a video analyzing the to all the boys trilogy fashion?
That Dorothy idea is genius
Ooo thanks! I’m writing an Alice in wonderland reimagine though I didn’t know if it was a rewrite or a reimagine or wateva, so thanks!
The reboot I respect is the MCU. A lot of it was more of an adaptation, because it was working on superheros that had not been done in movies very recently. I am not sure if Iron Man had ever had a movie adaptation before, so previous on-screen material was probably all cartoons. The Hulk was a lot more recent, with the Eric Bana movie not that long before teh MCU Incredible Hulk, butt then if I understand it right (never having properly sat and watched TIH) the MCU movie is not the story of how Bruce first became the Hulk, but a story of what happens to him some time after. Captain America has had a fair few versions, and I think there was one in the 90s, but the MCU started with a period piece on Steve's origin (framed in modern day sequences at start and end), and then going into Cap's iconic "Man Out Of Time" shtick. But Marvel!Thor didn't have much outside cartoons, Black Widow even less, Hawkeye even less than that. These are characters who may have popped up in one episode in another superhero's show, but Avengers took them and made the huge. And the MCU kept doing that, bringing previously less adapted heroes, (and digging up more recent revived characters and giving us them onscreen in such a good way it made the actor's carreer - yes I am talking about Bucky Barnes, who had been revived in the comics only 6-7 years prior to Captain America, but the plot of "The First Avenger" was tailored to bring in the Winter Soldier, since Bucky's fall was a huge emotional point of the story, and that plot is a Winter Soldier ret-con, I believe). Seriously, I cannot express how I love the MCU for making Bucky such a hugely famous character, and he's going to be in the up-coming Thunderbolts too, where I hope he, Yelena and Alexi have a real Russian thing going. But the notable thing I feel about the MCU is how it managed to get in characters whose film rights were... difficult, into the movies. First was the deal for the Maximoff twins, which yeah sad it involved killing off Pietro, but then they were able to play on that in WandaVision, but the big one? Spider-Man. The thing is, they did not do yet another remake - didn't go retelling Peter's origin story because we meet Peter through the lense of Tony Stark. But there were, in the Spider-Man movies themselves, indications that MCU!Peter went through the same general events - in NWH Peter outright says he got bitten by a spider, in Homecoming May is seen wearing rings on a chain around her neck and Peter says they've had a hard time in the last year, in FFH Peter has a suitcase with Ben Parker's initials on it, and going back to NWH, Peter does not react oddly when the other two Peters mention Uncle Ben. That is the other big point about the MCU Spider-Man - it made the previous versions of Spider-Man canon - somewhere out in the canon MCU multiverse, the other two Spider-Man franchises exist.
So when it comes to reboots and remakes, I effin' adore the MCU Spider-Man because it validated both previous Spider-Mans, even to the point where, when Peter 3 (Andrew Garfield) is talking himself down, Peter 1 (Tobey McGuire) says "No! You're amazing!", validating the ASM movies. Can you tell I loved NWH?