ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
- 11th meeting between Robredo & Federer. Federer previously led the head to head by 10-0 before this match.
Check out my VK channel for more highlights: video/@...
No copyright is intended, all rights go to its respective owners!
Check out my VK channel for more highlights: vk.com/video/@id860473103?section=uploaded
No copyright is intended, all rights go to its respective owners!
Amazing uploads Kunnu, thanks a lot for all your works.
One little thing to you can do to improve the overall quality and smoothness is reencode and render at the exact same fps as the original interlaced footage.
If the original footage is 1080i 25fps (50fps interlaced), it will look smoother if you reencode with Handbrake at 50fps and you edit and export it at 50fps.
Also, you can render at 2k (for 12mbps) or even 4k (20mbps) if you want extra bitrate in TH-cam or VK. Because 1080p50fps is only around 5mbps.
Keep your work up 👋🏻
Thanks brother! Right now I’m using an editing device that only accepts 60 fps files which is the reason why I upscale the frame rate. I’ll have to make sure to take your advice though, thanks for the advice!
He made robredo look amazing in this match and then look at what nadal did to him
He didn't. He played super passive with total lack of confidence clearly because of the bad back. Compare it to their Wimbledon 2014 match where Roger destroyed him in 3 straight sets.
2013 is when Roger’s movement changed and technique. I don’t think the larger racket was only due to backhand control, his slice technique changed in 2014 and by 2016 non existent.
His ground strokes looked so much more wristy and exaggerated. He started doing that a bit more in 2012, but 2013 looked like a perfect combination of suboptimal technique mixed with poor movement due to injury
He compacted his strokes in 2017. If you look at his 2014-2015 season, he still had the same somewhat larger strokes he had with the 90. Once he compensated to the bigger frame it made up for his declining movement.
@@TheGodsMustBeCrazyyoure right, I dont understand why he wasted time going back to the 90 for the rest of the 2013 season after he used the bigger frame at Hamburg 2013
@@Olympiamaniac It takes time to get used to a new racket and a head size with a new frame, balance point, swing weight etc. is difficult, even at that level. You have to remember he used an 85 and then used the 90 (with different tweaks but still the same head size) for 10 years. That's a long time. That's why he started playing better in the summer of 2014 with the RF 97 because he was finally comfortable with it. Also, champions are stubborn. Sampras used the 85 his entire career and regretted not switching. Nadal has been using the Aero Pro Drive Original his entire career and Murray used the PT57A since 2010. Only Djokovic I think in recent memory has switched his frame. And that wasn't even a head size change. His head size is still a 95 but it's 18x19 instead of 18x20 and is 27.5 inches instead of 27.
Federer irriconoscibile in questa partita ha sbagliato tanti Rovesci😢😢
This match and the one against Haas in Stuttgart are the only two matches which Roger didn't wanted to win at all.
Federer's 2013 is his worst season ever. You make it sound like he just had a terrible day that day. Tell me you don't watch tennis without actually telling me
@@itiswhatitis8875 Like I didn't know. Nadal was waiting in the quarters and it was going to be a murder.
Thank god he didn't even hesitated to let it go.
@@masters.1000 tf are you on about 🤣 why do you keep trying to come up with these ridiculously baseless hypotheses? Fed's back was bothering him and he clearly wasn't even playing like 40% of his usual best, but it doesn't mean he didn't wanna face against Rafa at the US open for the very first time (which eventually never happened). Do you have any evidence that Fed "didn't want to win at all"? No so shut up
I agree something was off about his play in this match. His confidence must’ve been rock bottom as well
@@Olympiamaniac Clearly he wanted to take a long break from tennis after that shocking exit loss to Stakhovsk at the 2013 Wimbledon 2R. Thanks to the bad back. He kept stubbornly trying to make things work by playing in Hamburg and Gstaad (let alone trying a newly larger frame racket in the middle of the season, for the first time in his career), only to lose to low-rank players back-to-back. In Cincinnati he shined a little bit by losing to Rafa in 3 strenuous sets but really didn't recover at all until the US open. And then he fell to world no.7, lowest ranking in over a decade for him, before even the US open started. This loss to Robredo was like icing on a cake. He showed some promising signs by reaching semi, final and semi in Swiss Indoors, Paris Bercy and then WTF respectively, losing to Del Potro, Djoko and Nadal in that order. But he should've just taken a long absence (like the 6-month absence in 2016 after loss to Raonic at Wimbledon SF) after this loss to Robredo trying out the new racket before 2014 started. In 2014 season he permanently switched to the 97 size but still couldn't win a major.
Rogers Level was truly in the dumpster here... his movement declined so much
Agree, not as much as 33+ Agassi though.
@@vijayla21 You're wrong LOL, 33+ agassi was still making slam finals, roger here did virtually nothing in 2013
@@Alexx22570 33+ means every age from 33 onwards. Agassi who can barely move with a back injury got some success purely because it was the weakest era of all time. Beating Rainer Schuertler in a slam final is not impossible.
@@vijayla21 Agassi got success because he was still playing good
It’s as simple as that
@@Alexx22570 Of course, he's way better than Schuertler, Verkerk, Gaudio, Puerta,...
No matter how empty the court is, you can bet your house Federer will hit the ball back to his opponent's side.
Huh?
Huh???
Yeah i remember this one .. roger lost on purpose to run from Nadal in quarters .. kind of a pussy move tbh .
Nadal was Federer’s nightmare in those years between 2008-2014
This was Federer worst year and they never even faced at us open so can’t compare to AO which has different conditions. Nadal also avoided Federer at us open too
Fed played one of his best matches couple weeks before in cinci and still lost to nadal due to consistent shanks in big points, he should’ve stuck with the bigger racket when he trialled it in Hamburg after Wimbledon that year. I think he would’ve had a resurgent year if he had
Its good roger didn’t face Rafa that year
He did several times...... lmao
@@Alexx22570He probably ment at Us open, Robredos next opponent was Rafa and he got demolished
Nadal only faced Federer 1 time in 2015 in Nadal worst year. Federer already faced Nadal 4 time in 2013 in his worst year. Federer doesn’t owe Nadal another us open match 2013 match when Nadal has not done the same in 2015