What’s your favorite dinosaur? Roar about it in the comments! For everything Jurassic World, check out our playlist!: th-cam.com/video/atnfLaXL_wY/w-d-xo.html
Tyrannosaurus, not the rex, but the Imperator, the biggest and the Chad of the 3 Tyrannosaurus subspecies... the Dinos in JP/JW are inaccurate AF, T-rex bite is so weak, it's bite should be 431,000 Psi more or less...
Ιt's weird that every image that we have from dinosaurs in movies, video games etc has the characteristics that we first saw in Jurassic Park. What a legacy a movie can leave behind!
I think people who get upset that the dinos are t accurate forget that literally in the first film, they say that they used DNA from amphibians to finish missing parts. Meaning they fundamentally changed the core base if the dinos and they would be new versions of the species. Any differences would be due to these changes in the DNA structure.
@@kriscynical it was already a hotly debated topic then when the film was made, but Stephen Spielberg chose to go with traditional dinosaur looks for the film because he said the feathers looked goofy like giant turkeys, which is a line he made Alan say in the movie hahaha
That’s what I’m trying to say! Also, the velociraptors in Jurassic Park are theropods called deinonychuses! Micheal Crichton, the author of Jurassic Park, called them velociraptors though, because it’s easier to say, and for marketing.
Fun fact : Velociraptors lived in Asia and the T-Rex lived in North America, maybe at the same time, but not in the same place, the T-Rex's cousin , Tarbosaurus lived in Asia and at the same time as the Velociraptor
How do you know that Velociraptors lived in Asia and the T-Rex lived in North America, because as far as I know that those continents didn’t exist at that time, that there was one huge continent called Pangea and at some point in our history that Pangea had split apart and becoming what the continents are now!
@@kennethneece4838 good point but if the fossils are found in what is now asia, and t. rex fossils are mainly found in north america then wouldn’t it be logical say they lived in what would become Asia and north america?
Well the dinosaurs in the Jurassic series were engineered so maybe Dr. Wu made them to look how we expected them to look back then. Edit: thx for all the likes and what I meant to say was that in Jurassic world the Indominous rex was made by doctor wu designed it so maybe he did that to the other dinosaurs.
They basically say this in the movies, they use the frog dna to substitute for missing dna, they also say they made them scary and a certain way to sell tickets in one of the later movies. Jurassic park is a theme park and the Dinos are the attractions, they are never meant to be a 100% accurate recreations.
In the book, there is a scene before everything goes bad where Wu confronts Hammond with a plan for a 2.0 series of dinosaurs that are altered to be more like we pictured them back in the 60's and 70's. His reasoning was that even despite the alterations in their DNA, the dinosaurs he had made weren't what anybody expected and felt people wouldn't resonate with them due to their antiquated views. On top of it, Wu knew that the park wasn't designed with smart, fast, bird like dinosaurs in mind, and saw the problems they would face trying to contain them.
05:35 That's the thing with the Jurassic Park/World franchise: whenever a carnivore appears on the screen and people are around, the animal is always on the hunt. The Lost World the book did that in a much more interesting way: during the first encounter with a tyrannosaur the animal simply peed on the jeep to mark its territory before wandering off. No unnecessary human hunting.
I'm in the middle of the Lost World book on Spotify. There's also a scene where a male T-rex attacks the characters not out of hunger but to defend his nest. They even point out how thin he is because he's neglecting his own nourishment to protect the eggs
@@tvbnine793 Wow, brilliantly realistic! Thanks for shsring; it's been a while since I've read the books and I've apparently forgotten the details you've just described.
@@Leto85 oh yeah it's very realistic because living bird and reptile parents are known to act like that. Listening to that shit while strip mining in minecraft is therapy
@@tvbnine793 Ah, you're listening to an audio book. I wish you all the fun. 😊 Is stripmining a sort of grinding process? I have heard amazing stories about Minecraft myself, and seen literal art videos of it on TH-cam, but I haven't played it myself. If you'd like to tell me more I'd love to read it. How do you play Minecraft?
Well raptors like that did exist, Utahraptors amusingly enough where discovered right around the time the movie came out and track decently well with the franchises raptors.
@@tristanwhite3188 theres an animated series called Camp Cretaceous. It takes place in Jurrasic World at the time the Indominus Rex breaks out. The Camp is on the other side of the island.
The appearance of the dinos is clearly explained by the scientist. They did not have the full genetic code so ended up mixing it with other creatures such as frogs, crocs, etc, so they would look different compared to the actual ones.
With them being described as "really angry chickens", that Velociraptor scene in the first film would be a lot more funny than horrifying if it was actually accurate 😂
@@RabuHina it does make you wonder what Jurassic Park would have been like had it been made in 2022 with the knowledge we have of dinosaurs now compared to that in 1993
@@Matthew_Rushton that is very true! I legit thought dinosaurs where giant lizards. This is what I thought when I first saw Jurassic Park (1993/4?) as a kid. Now as an adult seeing them with feathers does make me snicker a little but at least its accurate and does still make (at least for me) the movie just as enjoyable
Fun fact about the Dilophosaurus: She's also much larger in the novel than in the movie. The image at 12:00 is more accurate to her book counterpart. The reason she's smaller in the movie is because everyone working on the movie wanted the T-rex to stand out as the biggest and most well-known carnivore.
The Dilophosaurus in the first film was changed to smaller build due to the smaller role she played in JP1. The Velociraptors in reality were actually the size of the Spitter seen in the first JP film, but they were made as big as humans in the first JP films and all other films, so as to pose as a bigger threat to the humans. And t It would be ridiculous to see small-sized Raptors running around the Visitor Center to hunt down the humans.
In reference to #10, not only were most of the depicted dinosaurs native to the Cretaceous Period, but many of the species on display in the franchise were separated from each other's times by dozens of millions of years. The T-Rex died off around 66 million years ago, while the Stegosaurus was extinct around 150 million years ago. So in a relative way, modern humans existed closer in time to T-Rex, than T-Rex was to Stegosaurus. The ages that the Earth was ruled by dinosaurs covered some 170 million years of the Earth's 4.5 billion year lifetime.
I think that’s was the thing about Jurassic Park is that the dinosaurs aren’t “pure”. Their genes gaps were filled with multiple different genetic structures. It’s plausible some changes would occur within the growth of the dinosaurs.
@@mUSIC0IS0GOOD actually in Jurassic World 2015, Henry wu already explained this. he quoted “Nothing in Jurassic World is natural, we have always filled gaps in the genome with the DNA of other animals. And if the genetic code was pure, many of them would look quite different” i don’t know why they are making a big fuss of its unrealistic concept of the dinosaurs when even in JP 1, Allan Grant had only mentioned the gene splicing of the dinos.
Thank you, I already feel like a relict of a long forgotten era... Phone booths Analogue maps (with CCCR) Libraries Bilingual dictionaries Kids being unsupervised Smoking being cool Kids drinking with their parents Etc. Etc.
@@edi9892 A better era, most certainly. When I go out these days I just see zombies staring down at their phones, kids with more chins than a Chinese phonebook, and a divorce rate higher than Cheech and Chong. The 80's and 90's were the perfect balance between analog and digital, but now digital has taken over and the world is worse off. I'm an electronics/electrical/software engineer and am looking at changing careers after nearly two and a half decades. I feel like I'm helping the rot take over.
You could explain the Dilophosaurus one with like "oh we found dilophosaurus dna lets just make the dilophosaurus even more cool!" and then they put some frog DNA and spitting cobra DNA inside it, and that's also likely a juvenile, and the T. Rex's bad vision might be a bad side effect that for some reason occured because of the frog DNA. Edit: nevermind i forgot about that scene, the film makers most likely just misunderstood the book and thought the whole species of t. rex had terrible vision
The T. Rex predator vs scavenger debate is, in fact, no longer a thing. Enough fossil evidence has proven that it was a predator. But like any meat eater, it wouldn't pass on a carcass for an easy meal.
the fact is that it actually did both full time but when searching for food ti most likely tried to scavenge first before resorting to hunting . A creature this size would have used up a lot of its energy hunting after a prey in just a few seconds trying to catch its prey . It would try to find a carcasse first then it would hunt if it found none and ambush hunting wasn't something sucessfull everytime it would have been easy for raptors since they were fast but not for a Trex who would have been way to slow to have a significant success at ambushing . Doesn't mean that they didn't succeed at times trying it but it is most likely that they failed most of the time if they tried this kind of hunting Most of the Trex fossils that were found had fight injuries which suggest that the only thing they could hunt most of the time were preys its own size who could not run faster than they did and since now its been proven that Trex could only run at 15 kmh at the most it opens up a lot of theories on what kind of prey Trex most likely hunted when it only had that option to eat . It is more liekly that Trex actually scavenged first before using hunting since it had to fight preys of its own size if it did decide to hunt and that ment taking a lot of risk .
I believe the dilophosaurus was the first genetic hybrid in the series. The lizard frill from the Jesus lizard, venomous spray from a cobra and of course the frog DNA.
The Dilophosaurus in the movie scared the crap out of me when I was a kid and to this day I still don’t like watching scenes with it featured . The sound it makes , the frill and just the general viscous look of its face freaks me out . It’s comforting to know it didn’t really exist but I certainly wouldn’t want to meet the real Dilophosaurus either 😟
Dr wu even says in the movie that they used genes from other animals to fill in the lost gene he said the dinosaurs would look sooo much different but we didn't want real we wanted bigger teeth
I can't wait to see the new movie! I'm definitely a fan. Also I love your videos as well! Thank you for keeping me entertained with such great content! 👍
Thanks for the video! Super interesting -- love these movies, despite the more-than-occasional silliness. Having grown up around paleontologists, I feel compelled to make a few notes here which I hope someone finds interesting: Stygimoloch and Pachycephalosaurus: If you take a look at the skulls, even in photographs, they're pretty darned different -- probably *not* the same creature. Also note that Horner thinks Dracorex grows up to be Pachycephalosaurus, which, again, have completely different skulls, even discounting Dracorex's lack of head growth. Dino Digs: I've always thought these depictions of dinosaur digs are *hilarious.* Even though they're wrong, at least they make anyone who's ever gone on a dig laugh. T-rex speeds: Still much contended among the paleontologist community; many believe the T-rex does indeed reach higher speeds. Consider also that predators (see below note) usually need to be at least as fast as their prey. T-rex predation: Many skeletons of large herbivores have injuries, and even imbedded teeth, from T-rex -- which have *healed.* This means the animals were *alive* when they were attacked, and adds credence to the predator argument. Horner, one of the main believers in the scavenger side, says (and I kid you not) that the T-rex thought these animals must have been sleeping, then ran away when they woke up. Velociraptors: Bizarrely, since the first movie was made, *two* raptors of about the same or larger size, Dakota Raptor and the Utah Raptor, have been discovered, which is so weird and awesome and just a fun fact. Also, correct me if I'm wrong in any of these! Paleontology is full of politics, but I think everyone can agree dinosaurs are cool!
I read in a book wrote by Michael J Benton (Dinosaurs: visions of a lost world, if I'm not mistaken) that a t-rex most likely couldn't reach such high speeds, it was between 10 and 25 km/h. also, given the fact that its prey was probably of the same size, it makes sense. for example sauropods can't reach too high speeds
Out of all the Dinosaurs that are in the Jurassic Park series, my favorites will always be the Original T-Rex from the first Jurassic park and Jurassic world movies, also the 4 Raptor pack of Blue, Charlie, Delta and Echo, they are the coolest Dinosaurs ever in the Jurassic Park series and that's never going to change for me 🦖
10 years in the future, Top 20 scientific inaccuracies in WatchMojo's Top 20 scientific inaccuracies in Jurassic Park. Science Often adds to the confusion instead of the truth.
I mean when it came to feathers and just about everything else, I disregarded the fact because every dinosaur in the show aren't pure. Even if these facts are true, the movies explained that they're hybrids of frogs, and possibly other creatures. This especially is true for dilophosaurs, indominus rex, and other creatures.
Most of those things, if not all, already have been explained [away] or at could be explained within the franchise. Especially in Jurassic World, when Dr. Wu said "But you didn't ask for reality, you asked for more teeth." So ANYTHING regarding size, feathers and looks is essentially explained via this. Even the Brachiosaurus can be explained within the franchise's logic: Due to the genetic lottery (combining multiple species to create almost any dinosaur (except maybe the pure breads in Dominion)), the muscles could "stronger" and/or the bones could be denser and/or the flesh could be less dense. The latter two making the Brachiosaurus lighter and the first one making the already lighter dinosaur "easier" to "stand up". It might be "scientifically incorrect", but it is "explained" within the series' own "science".
The triceratops big pile of poo thing has been debunked. Yes it’s too big a pile for one triceratops to make, even in multiple goes, but considering it’s a wildlife park/zoo, the main reason there would be piles of poo this big is that the keepers/rangers use tractors to move dung into large piles in the same area. This is done with rhinoceroses in zoos and wildlife reserves as well, to let the animals know where their communal toilet is, so as not to poo all over their given space. Kind of like a natural litter box of sorts. Not a confirmed fact, just an educated assumption based on the current practices with similar sized animals in some zoos and wildlife reserves.
There’s a fact: the T-REX would have beaten the Spinosaurus. It wouldn’t have been a challenge at all. It would have been an instant victory for the Tyrannosaurus. The bite force of Tyrannosaurus rex was powerful and strong. It’s strong bite would crush the Spino Neck or Fins. Also it would have dominate. The spino in a battle would be in a disadvantage since it mainly lively in river like areas. So the fact that the two would have battle isn’t realistic nor a possibility.
You might be right, but bite force cannot be used as the sole deciding factor here. The bite force of the Spinosaurus would be enough to cause serious damage. Besides it had greater mass and longer, more usable «arms». It could go either way, although I too think the T.Rex would win more often than not.
@@bjornar9026 I’m not saying Spinosaurus can’t win. Yes it has longer arm and a larger mass than Tyrannosaurus. However, scientists state that the TRex would have won because it smarter, stronger, and more mobile than the spino. It could end the battle quickly of the TRex wanted to
Where the eff does it say anywhere that the trex was smarter than a spino? I have literally never seen this research. Your argument reads like a ten year old on too much sugar. The main issue with the spino in the jp series is that it is wildly inaccurate to paleontological evidence, and looks nothing like it's fossils suggest.
How are they going to be scientifically accurate when they were supposed to be cloned with incomplete DNA, so they used frog DNA to complete the sequence? Then you have the dinosaurs that are hybrids. Stop trying to always find fault and just enjoy the movie! 🤦♀️
Got to meet/pet the blind tiger they used for the roar of the trex in Jurassic park 1. It was a tiger they rescued from poachers and lived at the Rio Grande zoo in new Mexico.
there's also the fact that Baryonyx had a giant thumb claw. everyone notices the snout, but not the feature that sets it apart from other Spinosaurids? *sigh* i wish everyone would notice it... 9:25 the best it could do, was bellow. and as crocodilians taught us, they don't need a voice box to issue sound. all a dinosaur has to do is to forcefully let out air - to intimidate smaller predators off a carcass or a rival, to name two instances in which it would need to do that. and said bellow probably wouldn't sound like what you think it would. Dilophosaurus was the largest carnivore of the Early Jurassic; it was a superpredator. and it had stronger jaws than initially thought, not to mention its crests would have looked very different. 14:09 and its the juveniles you should run from. an adult Rex would see you as too small to be conidered food; along with other large carnivores. it's the small and mid-sized predators you should fear - including the juveniles of the large predators, as i said. 16:01 correct. its teeth were designed to grip and hold fish and its legs were far shorter than in JP3. not to mention that its tail was a large paddle/rudder; it spent more time in water than it did on land. in other words, Spinosaurus would be at a severe disadvantage if it battled a Tyrannosaurus. granted, it could use its jaws to grab the Rex's neck and drag it to the bottom of the river and attempt to drown it, but Tyrannosaurus had a thick and powerful neck; it could break free (and Prehistoric Planet showed us it could swim very well). but remember what Spinosaurus looked like? drowning the Rex could be possible if it was swimming; and there's still a debate whether Spinosaurus could actually swim (imo, the tail says yes; but i'll leave it to the experts to figure that out). 17:37 Biosyn, iirc, said that the dinosaurs they made there had *pure* DNA. remember the Atrociraptors? the woman who controlled them (forgot her name) said they were purebred... then why are they still featherless and are the size of Utahraptor? that's naming just one. 17:55 most likely a barely visible coat, like in Prehistoric Planet. you need to look VERY closely to notice the coat. large dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus had less and thinner layers of proto-feathers than the smaller ones like Velociraptor, since the climate was too hot for a large predator like Tyrannosaurus to warrant a dense coat. 19:55 like the majority of bipedal carnivores. i like to think this is an "alternate Earth" situation.
i grew up watching the trilogy and nothing beats it i remember when we came back to fl on vacation in 1998 they had a rid kind of like jarisic park the one that spits you gotta watch out and the Raptors there fast
The interesting thing is that all these inaccuracies are completely justified. As Dr. Grant said in JP3, ingen created theme park monsters, nothing more, nothing less. Pile on top of that the use of frog DNA to complete the gaps (as explained in JP), and who know what you'll end up with?
This was a fact that Henry Wu also confirmed to Misrani in Jurassic World, he stated that if they made the dinosaurs more accurate, they would look VERY different
Yes, it's inaccurate. Yes, science has learned bunches in the last 3 decades. Do I still adore the first film, and do I still tear up at that beautiful brachiasaur? Bet your ass I do! That said, this was great fun.
Inaccuracy #7: Well, I’m sorry to say this, but, I’m lawyering that “inaccuracy” for a reason. Look, like, did we forget that all these dinosaurs have frog DNA involved? Yes? Well, in a later scene (after the T-rex breaks out of the paddock), Alan encounters some dinosaurs eggs, and gives a brilliant explanation about how some types of frogs can change their gender in a single-sex environment. So, if the frog DNA affects the dinosaurs’ genders, and mating rituals, why not their vision, too. Look, frogs can actually only see objects that move. Otherwise, they’ll starve to death if the objects don’t move. Frogs can also only focus on some specific objects, so they don’t get to concentrated on what’s not important to them, like shadows. Credit goes to BRIGHT SIDE, and the Jaw-Dropping Facts channel.
I do like the fact checking of pictures (especially the "based on a true story" ones). I don't mind inaccuracies in fantasy movies. Only when something strikes me as unintentionally ridiculous does it bug me.
The JP animals were made with genetic engineering. They can make the dinosaurs look however they want and give them any ability, according to the science in the films.
@@DevilRaptorB that's why I personally think Michael Crichton should have waited a couple more years before he wrote and published that book. Which btw I kind of liked it better because it was more brutal and graphic than any of the movies ever were. Seriously they should grow some balls and make an R rated Jurassic Park movie!!!!
Fun fact: while T-rex was not fast, it was fairly maneuverable and agile for its bulk and stocky frame, and due to padding on their feet, they could be be Yards away from you and moving and still could not be felt by its footsteps.
fun fact: the velociraptors in jurassic park were actually designed off of the utahraptor, as the velociraptor was actually only the size of a dog in reality
Another name for the Deinonychus antirrhopus was velociraptor antirrhopus because of how closely it was related to the velociraptor mongoliensis. The jp franchise never specified sooooo maybe they dodge that one. I like that you guys read the book and did proper research. 👌
Also naming conventions are hard to get accepted in the paleontology community. By the time Spielberg made the movies, the names used in the books (velociraptor) were outdated. And I’m not up to date in my paleontology but I think even Deinonychus is out of date.
Archeologists and paleontologists use big excavators for the heavy digging and spades and shovels for the proximity of that which they want to dig out. As they come closer they use smaller one-handed spades, like the ones you would use to plant flowers in pots. The brushes are only used to remove the soil and sand in contact with the fossil, where a spade would cause damage to it.
Considering evolution changed them into birds.....I would imagine their vocalizations probably did some changing as well...... not saying they roared....but doubt they sounded like emu either..... too many changes over such a vast span of time...no doubt their noises did some changing too.
I always assumed the piles of dinosaur shit had been collected by the staff from the enclosures and disposed of in a specific place like any other zoo.
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
What’s your favorite dinosaur? Roar about it in the comments!
For everything Jurassic World, check out our playlist!: th-cam.com/video/atnfLaXL_wY/w-d-xo.html
I don’t know, most modern reptiles can only see things that move, some however, like snakes, see body heat
I’m glad that I’m not the only one pointing out the compy’s pack hunting behaviors.
Tyrannosaurus, not the rex, but the Imperator, the biggest and the Chad of the 3 Tyrannosaurus subspecies...
the Dinos in JP/JW are inaccurate AF, T-rex bite is so weak, it's bite should be 431,000 Psi more or less...
The Jurassic franchise isn’t made for scientific accuracy
My fav dino is spino and indominus rex
Ιt's weird that every image that we have from dinosaurs in movies, video games etc has the characteristics that we first saw in Jurassic Park. What a legacy a movie can leave behind!
not really. not "every" image, maybe a lot, but no all.
I think people who get upset that the dinos are t accurate forget that literally in the first film, they say that they used DNA from amphibians to finish missing parts. Meaning they fundamentally changed the core base if the dinos and they would be new versions of the species. Any differences would be due to these changes in the DNA structure.
That and I don't think they made the "dinosaurs had feathers" discovery until after the original movie had been made, right...?
@@kriscynical it was already a hotly debated topic then when the film was made, but Stephen Spielberg chose to go with traditional dinosaur looks for the film because he said the feathers looked goofy like giant turkeys, which is a line he made Alan say in the movie hahaha
True
They probably used the Frilled Lizard's DNA for Dilo's signature umbrella frill.
That’s what I’m trying to say! Also, the velociraptors in Jurassic Park are theropods called deinonychuses! Micheal Crichton, the author of Jurassic Park, called them velociraptors though, because it’s easier to say, and for marketing.
Fun fact : Velociraptors lived in Asia and the T-Rex lived in North America, maybe at the same time, but not in the same place, the T-Rex's cousin , Tarbosaurus lived in Asia and at the same time as the Velociraptor
Wasn't it all just Pangea during the dinosaur era though?
if i remember correctly during the jurassic period the supercontinent had already broken into a few smaller continents due to plate tetonics shifting
@@inoli3164 thanks
How do you know that Velociraptors lived in Asia and the T-Rex lived in North America, because as far as I know that those continents didn’t exist at that time, that there was one huge continent called Pangea and at some point in our history that Pangea had split apart and becoming what the continents are now!
@@kennethneece4838 good point but if the fossils are found in what is now asia, and t. rex fossils are mainly found in north america then wouldn’t it be logical say they lived in what would become Asia and north america?
Well the dinosaurs in the Jurassic series were engineered so maybe Dr. Wu made them to look how we expected them to look back then.
Edit: thx for all the likes and what I meant to say was that in Jurassic world the Indominous rex was made by doctor wu designed it so maybe he did that to the other dinosaurs.
They basically say this in the movies, they use the frog dna to substitute for missing dna, they also say they made them scary and a certain way to sell tickets in one of the later movies. Jurassic park is a theme park and the Dinos are the attractions, they are never meant to be a 100% accurate recreations.
Well,Taneleer, how many dinosaurs have you got hidden away?
In the book, there is a scene before everything goes bad where Wu confronts Hammond with a plan for a 2.0 series of dinosaurs that are altered to be more like we pictured them back in the 60's and 70's. His reasoning was that even despite the alterations in their DNA, the dinosaurs he had made weren't what anybody expected and felt people wouldn't resonate with them due to their antiquated views. On top of it, Wu knew that the park wasn't designed with smart, fast, bird like dinosaurs in mind, and saw the problems they would face trying to contain them.
They don't even look accurate in the dominion prologue set in the Cretaceous
Yeha cuz not everyone knew that dinos had feathers
05:35 That's the thing with the Jurassic Park/World franchise: whenever a carnivore appears on the screen and people are around, the animal is always on the hunt.
The Lost World the book did that in a much more interesting way: during the first encounter with a tyrannosaur the animal simply peed on the jeep to mark its territory before wandering off. No unnecessary human hunting.
I'm in the middle of the Lost World book on Spotify. There's also a scene where a male T-rex attacks the characters not out of hunger but to defend his nest. They even point out how thin he is because he's neglecting his own nourishment to protect the eggs
@@tvbnine793 Wow, brilliantly realistic! Thanks for shsring; it's been a while since I've read the books and I've apparently forgotten the details you've just described.
@@Leto85 oh yeah it's very realistic because living bird and reptile parents are known to act like that. Listening to that shit while strip mining in minecraft is therapy
@@tvbnine793 Ah, you're listening to an audio book. I wish you all the fun. 😊 Is stripmining a sort of grinding process? I have heard amazing stories about Minecraft myself, and seen literal art videos of it on TH-cam, but I haven't played it myself.
If you'd like to tell me more I'd love to read it. How do you play Minecraft?
It didn't pee. It pooped. It was the parasaurolphus herd that went peeing.😉
The names Jurassic Park and Velociraptors sound much cooler than reality. I also love the design of the raptors in this series.
You’re right, Cretaceous Camp doesn’t ring to well lol
Well raptors like that did exist, Utahraptors amusingly enough where discovered right around the time the movie came out and track decently well with the franchises raptors.
@@kitsunedarkfire2915 exactly the Utah raptor is massive
@@tristanwhite3188 theres an animated series called Camp Cretaceous. It takes place in Jurrasic World at the time the Indominus Rex breaks out. The Camp is on the other side of the island.
Based and paleontologic inaccurate pilled
I like the spinosaurus not because it killed a tyrannosaurus rex in JP3, but because it is so unique and beautiful, yet still so mysterious.
The appearance of the dinos is clearly explained by the scientist. They did not have the full genetic code so ended up mixing it with other creatures such as frogs, crocs, etc, so they would look different compared to the actual ones.
The name Jurassic park was brought up in the book, basically Hammond says it was chosen because it sounds cool.
The Gasosaurus is a dinosaur that resembles the raptor aesthetic from the movies, but I admit that "velociraptor" has a much better ring to it.
With them being described as "really angry chickens", that Velociraptor scene in the first film would be a lot more funny than horrifying if it was actually accurate 😂
So true xD I even found the phrasing of saying T-Rex had 'luxurious fluff', I get this image of a colourful looking T-Rex 😆
@@RabuHina it does make you wonder what Jurassic Park would have been like had it been made in 2022 with the knowledge we have of dinosaurs now compared to that in 1993
@@Matthew_Rushton that is very true! I legit thought dinosaurs where giant lizards. This is what I thought when I first saw Jurassic Park (1993/4?) as a kid. Now as an adult seeing them with feathers does make me snicker a little but at least its accurate and does still make (at least for me) the movie just as enjoyable
Yeah apparently you have never seen a angry chicken have you?
Fun fact about the Dilophosaurus: She's also much larger in the novel than in the movie. The image at 12:00 is more accurate to her book counterpart. The reason she's smaller in the movie is because everyone working on the movie wanted the T-rex to stand out as the biggest and most well-known carnivore.
They looked much bigger in the newest movie
They were right to do that cuz that sht is terrifying being that big 😭😭
Thanks for the information.
The Dilophosaurus in the first film was changed to smaller build due to the smaller role she played in JP1. The Velociraptors in reality were actually the size of the Spitter seen in the first JP film, but they were made as big as humans in the first JP films and all other films, so as to pose as a bigger threat to the humans. And t It would be ridiculous to see small-sized Raptors running around the Visitor Center to hunt down the humans.
@@Tanat83 in the novel the raptors were 2m tall anyway. So they didn't really change the size.
I wasn’t there but I can guarantee the TRex didn’t “coo”. Probably made guttural sounds like a big gator
In reference to #10, not only were most of the depicted dinosaurs native to the Cretaceous Period, but many of the species on display in the franchise were separated from each other's times by dozens of millions of years. The T-Rex died off around 66 million years ago, while the Stegosaurus was extinct around 150 million years ago. So in a relative way, modern humans existed closer in time to T-Rex, than T-Rex was to Stegosaurus. The ages that the Earth was ruled by dinosaurs covered some 170 million years of the Earth's 4.5 billion year lifetime.
I think that’s was the thing about Jurassic Park is that the dinosaurs aren’t “pure”. Their genes gaps were filled with multiple different genetic structures. It’s plausible some changes would occur within the growth of the dinosaurs.
Exactly. Dominion even explained this. I can't remember exactly where, but the addons to the Dilos were explained and they were also juveniles.
@@mUSIC0IS0GOOD actually in Jurassic World 2015, Henry wu already explained this. he quoted “Nothing in Jurassic World is natural, we have always filled gaps in the genome with the DNA of other animals. And if the genetic code was pure, many of them would look quite different”
i don’t know why they are making a big fuss of its unrealistic concept of the dinosaurs when even in JP 1, Allan Grant had only mentioned the gene splicing of the dinos.
2:37
Wrong , it only touched a small bit of the lava and managed to remove it quicky. Lava is not an instakill liquid.
"They were basically angry chickens"
Me: "so just regular chickens"
Giant long tailed angry chickens
Or even just lizard like birds
That was good
For the record, JP came out almost THIRTY years ago. 🤷♀️
Thank you, I already feel like a relict of a long forgotten era...
Phone booths
Analogue maps (with CCCR)
Libraries
Bilingual dictionaries
Kids being unsupervised
Smoking being cool
Kids drinking with their parents
Etc. Etc.
True, yet the Jurassic World movies were released much more recently and still have so many things wrong with them.
And
@@edi9892 A better era, most certainly. When I go out these days I just see zombies staring down at their phones, kids with more chins than a Chinese phonebook, and a divorce rate higher than Cheech and Chong.
The 80's and 90's were the perfect balance between analog and digital, but now digital has taken over and the world is worse off. I'm an electronics/electrical/software engineer and am looking at changing careers after nearly two and a half decades. I feel like I'm helping the rot take over.
You could explain the Dilophosaurus one with like "oh we found dilophosaurus dna lets just make the dilophosaurus even more cool!" and then they put some frog DNA and spitting cobra DNA inside it, and that's also likely a juvenile, and the T. Rex's bad vision might be a bad side effect that for some reason occured because of the frog DNA.
Edit: nevermind i forgot about that scene, the film makers most likely just misunderstood the book and thought the whole species of t. rex had terrible vision
The T. Rex predator vs scavenger debate is, in fact, no longer a thing. Enough fossil evidence has proven that it was a predator. But like any meat eater, it wouldn't pass on a carcass for an easy meal.
the fact is that it actually did both full time but when searching for food ti most likely tried to scavenge first before resorting to hunting . A creature this size would have used up a lot of its energy hunting after a prey in just a few seconds trying to catch its prey . It would try to find a carcasse first then it would hunt if it found none and ambush hunting wasn't something sucessfull everytime it would have been easy for raptors since they were fast but not for a Trex who would have been way to slow to have a significant success at ambushing . Doesn't mean that they didn't succeed at times trying it but it is most likely that they failed most of the time if they tried this kind of hunting Most of the Trex fossils that were found had fight injuries which suggest that the only thing they could hunt most of the time were preys its own size who could not run faster than they did and since now its been proven that Trex could only run at 15 kmh at the most it opens up a lot of theories on what kind of prey Trex most likely hunted when it only had that option to eat . It is more liekly that Trex actually scavenged first before using hunting since it had to fight preys of its own size if it did decide to hunt and that ment taking a lot of risk .
Somewhere once I was reading that there was no animal with the teeth of a carnivore and horns...And yet, that Carnotaurus has both.
I believe the dilophosaurus was the first genetic hybrid in the series. The lizard frill from the Jesus lizard, venomous spray from a cobra and of course the frog DNA.
Wtf is a jesus lizard? I assumed the Australian frill neck
yeah the nickname comes from the fact that lizard runs over the surface of water
@@inoli3164 that's actually great
But does it have a frill neck or?
@@Brentonius_III a Jesus lizard is a species of lizard that can walk on water.
The Dilophosaurus in the movie scared the crap out of me when I was a kid and to this day I still don’t like watching scenes with it featured . The sound it makes , the frill and just the general viscous look of its face freaks me out . It’s comforting to know it didn’t really exist but I certainly wouldn’t want to meet the real Dilophosaurus either 😟
The novel version is basically the real Dilophosaurus but has acidic spit
I LOVE that the person with the pterosaur complaint tweet is one of the leading paleontologists in pterosaur research
Jurassic Park Trilogy VS Jurassic World Trilogy!
You're not taking the fact that Jurassic Park predates the Feathered Dinosaur discovery by a couple years. In later films they did add plumage.
Dr wu even says in the movie that they used genes from other animals to fill in the lost gene he said the dinosaurs would look sooo much different but we didn't want real we wanted bigger teeth
I can't wait to see the new movie! I'm definitely a fan. Also I love your videos as well! Thank you for keeping me entertained with such great content! 👍
Thanks for the video! Super interesting -- love these movies, despite the more-than-occasional silliness.
Having grown up around paleontologists, I feel compelled to make a few notes here which I hope someone finds interesting:
Stygimoloch and Pachycephalosaurus: If you take a look at the skulls, even in photographs, they're pretty darned different -- probably *not* the same creature. Also note that Horner thinks Dracorex grows up to be Pachycephalosaurus, which, again, have completely different skulls, even discounting Dracorex's lack of head growth.
Dino Digs: I've always thought these depictions of dinosaur digs are *hilarious.* Even though they're wrong, at least they make anyone who's ever gone on a dig laugh.
T-rex speeds: Still much contended among the paleontologist community; many believe the T-rex does indeed reach higher speeds. Consider also that predators (see below note) usually need to be at least as fast as their prey.
T-rex predation: Many skeletons of large herbivores have injuries, and even imbedded teeth, from T-rex -- which have *healed.* This means the animals were *alive* when they were attacked, and adds credence to the predator argument. Horner, one of the main believers in the scavenger side, says (and I kid you not) that the T-rex thought these animals must have been sleeping, then ran away when they woke up.
Velociraptors: Bizarrely, since the first movie was made, *two* raptors of about the same or larger size, Dakota Raptor and the Utah Raptor, have been discovered, which is so weird and awesome and just a fun fact.
Also, correct me if I'm wrong in any of these! Paleontology is full of politics, but I think everyone can agree dinosaurs are cool!
I read in a book wrote by Michael J Benton (Dinosaurs: visions of a lost world, if I'm not mistaken) that a t-rex most likely couldn't reach such high speeds, it was between 10 and 25 km/h. also, given the fact that its prey was probably of the same size, it makes sense. for example sauropods can't reach too high speeds
I'm slowly falling in love with your voice
I believe that in the book the dilophosoraus was accurately sized
whoever writes these scripts must be really fun at parties
Just to clarify: back then hair and feathers were just evolving apart. Thus, don't expect modern feathers...
Pretty much everything is inaccurate about these movies! It's just cool to see dinosaurs eat crappy humans🤷
Which is why I never watch these movies. Too much deviation from the real facts.
I like when dino goes munch munch dum ppl
What Brenden is trying to say is that "it's fun to see the puny humans get eaten!"
@@boy_ka84 thts by far the dumbest attempt st being pretentious
@@boy_ka84 so don’t watch anything but documentaries then 💀
Out of all the Dinosaurs that are in the Jurassic Park series, my favorites will always be the Original T-Rex from the first Jurassic park and Jurassic world movies, also the 4 Raptor pack of Blue, Charlie, Delta and Echo, they are the coolest Dinosaurs ever in the Jurassic Park series and that's never going to change for me 🦖
Did you get angry at Jurassic Park 3 and hated people who liked it or thought it was ok?
Mosquito-Dinosaur Hybrids sound way worse. Can we have a film/park about those?
Star Wars VS Harry Potter! Sci-Fi vs Fantasy!
10 years in the future, Top 20 scientific inaccuracies in WatchMojo's Top 20 scientific inaccuracies in Jurassic Park. Science Often adds to the confusion instead of the truth.
No one knows because we weren’t around 100 million years ago so we have bones & artist rendering/movies & tv to go by 🤷🏻♂️
It's proven, T-rex doesn't have plumage, it's skin prints was discovered this recently!
Now I'm confused watchmojo, a paleontologist on Vanity Fair channel said the roar is possible.
I mean when it came to feathers and just about everything else, I disregarded the fact because every dinosaur in the show aren't pure. Even if these facts are true, the movies explained that they're hybrids of frogs, and possibly other creatures. This especially is true for dilophosaurs, indominus rex, and other creatures.
Inaccuracy #1: Tyrannosaurus rex lived in the Cretaceous, not the Jurassic. Off by 60 to 100 million years.
Um they covered that.
I don’t even get why they covered this. There was no claims the Dinos in the park were all from the Jurassic. It’s literally just the name.
Most of those things, if not all, already have been explained [away] or at could be explained within the franchise.
Especially in Jurassic World, when Dr. Wu said "But you didn't ask for reality, you asked for more teeth."
So ANYTHING regarding size, feathers and looks is essentially explained via this.
Even the Brachiosaurus can be explained within the franchise's logic: Due to the genetic lottery (combining multiple species to create almost any dinosaur (except maybe the pure breads in Dominion)), the muscles could "stronger" and/or the bones could be denser and/or the flesh could be less dense. The latter two making the Brachiosaurus lighter and the first one making the already lighter dinosaur "easier" to "stand up".
It might be "scientifically incorrect", but it is "explained" within the series' own "science".
If I wanted to watch a film about scientifically accurate dinosaurs I would watch a documentary film
This was going to be my comment too lol
Not a big budget Hollywood picture. Even the book said it wasn't done right in recreation.
The triceratops big pile of poo thing has been debunked. Yes it’s too big a pile for one triceratops to make, even in multiple goes, but considering it’s a wildlife park/zoo, the main reason there would be piles of poo this big is that the keepers/rangers use tractors to move dung into large piles in the same area. This is done with rhinoceroses in zoos and wildlife reserves as well, to let the animals know where their communal toilet is, so as not to poo all over their given space. Kind of like a natural litter box of sorts. Not a confirmed fact, just an educated assumption based on the current practices with similar sized animals in some zoos and wildlife reserves.
Also you can’t outrun a T. rex in high heels like in Jurassic world
Where are the Mythbusters when we need them!
@Justin Gochioco I agree though a lady on Facebook confirmed to me that's possible I mean she called me hun.....
If the t-rex would've kept running she would've either fallen and broken her legs or her heart would've exploded.
There’s a fact: the T-REX would have beaten the Spinosaurus. It wouldn’t have been a challenge at all. It would have been an instant victory for the Tyrannosaurus. The bite force of Tyrannosaurus rex was powerful and strong. It’s strong bite would crush the Spino Neck or Fins. Also it would have dominate. The spino in a battle would be in a disadvantage since it mainly lively in river like areas. So the fact that the two would have battle isn’t realistic nor a possibility.
You might be right, but bite force cannot be used as the sole deciding factor here. The bite force of the Spinosaurus would be enough to cause serious damage. Besides it had greater mass and longer, more usable «arms». It could go either way, although I too think the T.Rex would win more often than not.
@@bjornar9026 I’m not saying Spinosaurus can’t win. Yes it has longer arm and a larger mass than Tyrannosaurus. However, scientists state that the TRex would have won because it smarter, stronger, and more mobile than the spino. It could end the battle quickly of the TRex wanted to
Where the eff does it say anywhere that the trex was smarter than a spino? I have literally never seen this research. Your argument reads like a ten year old on too much sugar.
The main issue with the spino in the jp series is that it is wildly inaccurate to paleontological evidence, and looks nothing like it's fossils suggest.
How are they going to be scientifically accurate when they were supposed to be cloned with incomplete DNA, so they used frog DNA to complete the sequence? Then you have the dinosaurs that are hybrids.
Stop trying to always find fault and just enjoy the movie! 🤦♀️
They just made up the missing parts of the DNA. They are mutts
They aren't disrespecting the movies, but f*ck using them to educate people I guess.
@@Bagelgeuse 😂😂😂
"Do dinosaurs 🦕 moult feathers like birds?" 🐦
Got to meet/pet the blind tiger they used for the roar of the trex in Jurassic park 1. It was a tiger they rescued from poachers and lived at the Rio Grande zoo in new Mexico.
Can I just say that dinosaurs, sharks, snakes and crocodiles are like predator brothers?
Okay, I know they’re not but they all go way back
even Jimmy Neutron mentioned the T-Rex motion vision theory in an episode and hes a boy genius lol
there's also the fact that Baryonyx had a giant thumb claw.
everyone notices the snout, but not the feature that sets it apart from other Spinosaurids? *sigh* i wish everyone would notice it...
9:25 the best it could do, was bellow. and as crocodilians taught us, they don't need a voice box to issue sound. all a dinosaur has to do is to forcefully let out air - to intimidate smaller predators off a carcass or a rival, to name two instances in which it would need to do that. and said bellow probably wouldn't sound like what you think it would.
Dilophosaurus was the largest carnivore of the Early Jurassic; it was a superpredator. and it had stronger jaws than initially thought, not to mention its crests would have looked very different.
14:09 and its the juveniles you should run from. an adult Rex would see you as too small to be conidered food; along with other large carnivores.
it's the small and mid-sized predators you should fear - including the juveniles of the large predators, as i said.
16:01 correct. its teeth were designed to grip and hold fish and its legs were far shorter than in JP3. not to mention that its tail was a large paddle/rudder; it spent more time in water than it did on land.
in other words, Spinosaurus would be at a severe disadvantage if it battled a Tyrannosaurus.
granted, it could use its jaws to grab the Rex's neck and drag it to the bottom of the river and attempt to drown it, but Tyrannosaurus had a thick and powerful neck; it could break free (and Prehistoric Planet showed us it could swim very well).
but remember what Spinosaurus looked like? drowning the Rex could be possible if it was swimming; and there's still a debate whether Spinosaurus could actually swim (imo, the tail says yes; but i'll leave it to the experts to figure that out).
17:37 Biosyn, iirc, said that the dinosaurs they made there had *pure* DNA. remember the Atrociraptors? the woman who controlled them (forgot her name) said they were purebred... then why are they still featherless and are the size of Utahraptor?
that's naming just one.
17:55 most likely a barely visible coat, like in Prehistoric Planet. you need to look VERY closely to notice the coat.
large dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus had less and thinner layers of proto-feathers than the smaller ones like Velociraptor, since the climate was too hot for a large predator like Tyrannosaurus to warrant a dense coat.
19:55 like the majority of bipedal carnivores.
i like to think this is an "alternate Earth" situation.
Regardless of all the scientific inaccuracies, Jurassic Park is still a great franchise.
i grew up watching the trilogy and nothing beats it i remember when we came back to fl on vacation in 1998 they had a rid kind of like jarisic park the one that spits you gotta watch out and the Raptors there fast
They’ve made one good movie.
@@kolomvotos I beg to differ with The Lost World: Jurassic Park. More Golblum being Goldblum
@@kolomvotos yes.
With the recent release of "Jurassic World: Dominion," there are now 3 "Jurassic World" films just like there are 3 "Jurassic Park" films.
The interesting thing is that all these inaccuracies are completely justified. As Dr. Grant said in JP3, ingen created theme park monsters, nothing more, nothing less. Pile on top of that the use of frog DNA to complete the gaps (as explained in JP), and who know what you'll end up with?
This was a fact that Henry Wu also confirmed to Misrani in Jurassic World, he stated that if they made the dinosaurs more accurate, they would look VERY different
Ding Ding Ding
Yes, it's inaccurate. Yes, science has learned bunches in the last 3 decades. Do I still adore the first film, and do I still tear up at that beautiful brachiasaur? Bet your ass I do! That said, this was great fun.
Baryonyx was piscivorous, and like the paddle tailed Spinosaurus, semi-aquatic.
How do we know how fast a dead animal nobody has ever seen could go based off of their bones?🤔
Your editors were so preoccupied with whether they could make this video and didn't stop to think if they should.
Inaccuracy #7: Well, I’m sorry to say this, but, I’m lawyering that “inaccuracy” for a reason. Look, like, did we forget that all these dinosaurs have frog DNA involved? Yes? Well, in a later scene (after the T-rex breaks out of the paddock), Alan encounters some dinosaurs eggs, and gives a brilliant explanation about how some types of frogs can change their gender in a single-sex environment. So, if the frog DNA affects the dinosaurs’ genders, and mating rituals, why not their vision, too.
Look, frogs can actually only see objects that move. Otherwise, they’ll starve to death if the objects don’t move. Frogs can also only focus on some specific objects, so they don’t get to concentrated on what’s not important to them, like shadows. Credit goes to BRIGHT SIDE, and the Jaw-Dropping Facts channel.
May not be historically accurate, but still love all the Jurassic Park movies.
When Lego video games get the dinosaurs more accurate than the moviez
It wasn’t until the first movie came out Paleontologists discovered a raptor that was actually the size that was in the movie
"Genetically engineered theme park monsters, nothing more and nothing less."
My favorite dinosaur is Allosaurus, the pit bull of dinosaurs. T-Rex is the Rottweiler of dinosaurs and Jack Russell Terriers are the velociraptors.
Both raptors in the thumbnail are inaccurate
what about the Velociraptors that are acually Dinonychus? Velociraptor was smaller, like a dog, not human size
Mastiffs get big.
With those hind legs you'd think the t-rex would be faster than 15mph. Interesting. 🤷♀️
Dilophosaurus was big and lacked a neck frill in the novel as well
If I wanted scientific accuracy I wouldn’t be watching Hollywood movies.
Dilophosaurus: *gets bashed on because of it's size*
Youth: am I a joke to you?
finally the Dino DNA plot hole was mentioned
I do like the fact checking of pictures (especially the "based on a true story" ones). I don't mind inaccuracies in fantasy movies. Only when something strikes me as unintentionally ridiculous does it bug me.
They made them how they wanted them to look. There's feathered dinos in the new movie that are "unaltered"
The JP animals were made with genetic engineering. They can make the dinosaurs look however they want and give them any ability, according to the science in the films.
Yeah well the science of those films isn't reliable or consistent now is it?
@@RisingBeast00 that's why it's fiction.
@@RisingBeast00 nether is real life science ether , lets not forget that JP built its own science on what supposed to be accurate
We KNOWWWWWWW
@@DevilRaptorB that's why I personally think Michael Crichton should have waited a couple more years before he wrote and published that book. Which btw I kind of liked it better because it was more brutal and graphic than any of the movies ever were. Seriously they should grow some balls and make an R rated Jurassic Park movie!!!!
11:15 it was actually confirmed that they are juveniles when at that size.
"More like the size of a chicken?" 🐔
The most inaccurate thing about this list is WatchMojo ignoring that gene splicing makes it a whole new species
They acknowledge the period the dinosaurs are from. Jurassic park sounds the coolest.
Fun fact: while T-rex was not fast, it was fairly maneuverable and agile for its bulk and stocky frame, and due to padding on their feet, they could be be Yards away from you and moving and still could not be felt by its footsteps.
I’m pretty sure the T. rex ran faster then 15 mph. It wouldn’t eat if it ran that slow
Do Top 20 Scientific Inaccuracies in the Walking with series (Dinosaurs, Beasts, Monsters and spin-offs)
That cover is funny asf had to come to the comments to say it
What about what the Spinosaurus really looked like?
Ok look, I might not be the size of a turkey and I might not have feathers but I’m proud of who I am and that’s what matters
fun fact: the velociraptors in jurassic park were actually designed off of the utahraptor, as the velociraptor was actually only the size of a dog in reality
I don’t think I have a favorite dinosaur. I just love the Jurassic Park franchise and the animated Netflix series Jurassic World: Camp Cretaceous
Probably the worst scientific inaccuracy is that Claire could run in high heels for the majority of the movie!
Big Heards and Big Turds... I see what you did there!
The dilophosaur that killed dennis is a juvenile, dennis even says "i thought your one of the big ones", showing us there can be bigger ones.
the t-rex roar was explained years ago by the movie's creators
Another name for the Deinonychus antirrhopus was velociraptor antirrhopus because of how closely it was related to the velociraptor mongoliensis. The jp franchise never specified sooooo maybe they dodge that one. I like that you guys read the book and did proper research. 👌
Also naming conventions are hard to get accepted in the paleontology community. By the time Spielberg made the movies, the names used in the books (velociraptor) were outdated. And I’m not up to date in my paleontology but I think even Deinonychus is out of date.
I knew Dr Elle and grant would be back together
Archeologists and paleontologists use big excavators for the heavy digging and spades and shovels for the proximity of that which they want to dig out. As they come closer they use smaller one-handed spades, like the ones you would use to plant flowers in pots. The brushes are only used to remove the soil and sand in contact with the fossil, where a spade would cause damage to it.
Considering evolution changed them into birds.....I would imagine their vocalizations probably did some changing as well...... not saying they roared....but doubt they sounded like emu either..... too many changes over such a vast span of time...no doubt their noises did some changing too.
Being a discoverer; I've explored there possibiliies, collected fossils and read a lot about paleontology.
I always assumed the piles of dinosaur shit had been collected by the staff from the enclosures and disposed of in a specific place like any other zoo.