Unknown Unwanted yeah it must be absolutely violent. And this isn’t even a full fledged LMP/formula car. I can’t imagine the braking forces those things generate.
If you are impressed with the braking of the Audi, try getting your head around an f1 car. 5g braking performance, 125kg of pressure on pedal for maximum braking effect. Slowing from 210mph into a corner, the driver brakes for 2.09sec, slowing down to 83mph in just 122metres!
You can clearly see GT3 cars are less restricted than they were say 4 years ago. It is the most popular form of GT racing in this era. Why do we still call them GT3 cars anyway?
It's the braking and turn-in performance that really impress with these things. Especially the approach to turn two, off the crest at McPhillamy Park, and into the Dipper. Just awesome.
Naw, that braking at the chase... So late! My game, you come down Conrad at this exact speed (same car; Audi V10, 4wd), but you can't brake that late. The kink is the brake point.
solocompetitivo this track is currently one of the main online races in Gran Turismo Sport for the GT3 class and this guy is braking like 50ft/m (whatever the white board units are in) after the braking points
gothops154 GT Sport is fairly unrealistic when it comes to braking actually...they make the brakes work less than they would in real life...which is a bit weird. Officially on games such as iRacing, rFactor 2, or the AC sims you would actually brake a good 50m to 80m after you would in GT Sport. Which these games mentioned are considered by most people who race cars to be the most realistic sims on the market rn.
@@tankiller9638 The braking points in GT Sport are pretty much the same as in the hardcore sims that you mentioned. He doesn't brake like 50m after where you would brake in GT. The top GT Sport drivers also brake extremly late. It's all about skill...
There is a delay, it is not physically possible with pirelli tyres and this car I drive on ACC which is the reproduction of Blancpain GT3 with actually the same car, you cannot brake that late and still making the corner
@@PhO3NiX96 I noticed the delay on sound etc too, it doesn't match the video. Makes it look like he is braking at 50m when it's nearer 100m. Watching all other video's of GT3 cars on this track with very similar lap times shows this video has a delay to sound/info. I also play ACC and it's very close to the other video's with braking points etc, not this one.
I think it may have to do with the grip levels falling off harder when you start sliding. Like the tires stick on the road witb a constant amount of grip until it slips once and the whole thing loses ttaction as opposed to video games where they probably slip earlier, but have more traction while sliding. I have no idea why, im just speculating.
it's pretty damn close I think the fastest guy in American region was a 2:01 as well by NICO but with the gtr. It's amazing how close they are in times. I mean we have nothing to lose in a game, we can make risks that in real life could kill is, this lap is insane and at the limit ever corner.
Du hast mein kompletten Respekt. Auf so einer mega harten Strecke schnell zu fahen und dann noch der schnellste Audi R8 zu sein, da muss man schon Cochones haben. Daumen Hoch ;)
except project cars is a bad simulator hahah. it is widely known in the sim community as the fakest simulator branded game out there currently available. real sim racers stay the fuck away from that fake shit.
How can that be? AC works by look up tables mostly. If you care you can find explanations by the developer that AC actually doesn't simulate that much. I use the log data from iRacing and prospect it with MoTeC software, comparing the histogram of steering wheel angle to lateral force, from iRacing to real world data, I have to say iRacing tire physics looks pretty cheap and fake to me. Another point is, it's easy to guess that iRacing tire temperatures are just faked and not simulated based on driving in real time. To my observation, "sim racers" know very little about proper vehicle dynamic simulation and even less can calculate suspensions. I can and I used an industry level Vehicle Dynamics software. And from that experience and numerous frustrations I can tell you, pCARS is pretty damn good simulation even on industrial level. The suspension in pCARS is properly simulated based on hard points what is accurate for race cars. Road cars have rubber bushings, they are probably not well simulated but that is something that is extremely troublesome to simulated even for car makers and you can be sure that iRacing or AC doesn't even dream about bothering with that. And pCARS tire model with its heat system is ahead of any industrial level Pacejka model. Just to test your own simulation knowledge, if you never heard the word "Pacejka" before and never worked with a Pacejka model, you can be sure that you do not know much about tire simulation. There are a few things or rather certain driving situation where it's noticeable that pCARS simulation is missing some delay that in real life is always there due to compliance. Compliance is extremely difficult or extremely CPU costly to simulate in real time! That is the drawback of pCARS simulating so much and not faking results. However even F1 simulators don't simulate chassis compliance properly in real time. AC doesn't have this problem so much as they by far don't simulate that much and rather fake the result with look up tables that they tweak till the car drives as they think it should. I don't have any hard feelings about that, it's a legitimate approach esp. seeing that desktop pcs don't have infinite cpu power. However it also has drawbacks. In pCARS the devs can put any tire on any car and the simulation will do something with it, sometimes even something very interesting! AC can't do it because any tire change needs tweaking of the look up tables so that the car does what it should do, what can be pretty work intensive. So in short words, pCARS has a model that simulates the outcome. Put something in on the front and possibly something educative will come out. AC is all about creating a car behaviour that the devs desire and think it is realistic. They will do and tweak whatever they need until the huge spreadsheets puts out the numbers that make the car drive as they want. Because of that I'm very surprised any time someone says pCARS is a fake sim because based on the true meaning of simulation AC produces fake results that are tweaked to be as realistic as possible while pCARS actually simulates a lot. Every time I hear something like that, I'd ask to ask this "widely known sim community" where they get their knowledge of vehicle dynamics simulation from and why they say pCARS it's a fake simulation.
you dont know wtf you are talking about you didnt even mention one of the best Sim racing games in your post. you mentioned asseto and iracing nether witch is good in my opinion. you clearly dont have a clue what the best sim is out there. enjoy your SIMcade game my boy. more then half of the tracks are not even laser scanned. I know guys that have been sim racing for over 8 years and have done amateur racing and they have tried P.cars and they all said it was the fakest sim branded game they ever tried. i am not even gonna read half of that shit you might as well be playing Need for speed. keep kidding yourself . post muted. i am not gonna even mention the good sims you dont deserve to know.
Wow here is someone that is focused on only spreading his buns when doing a post and not contributing anything helpful. It's the sad example of a "sim racer" that thinks he knows everything but knows pretty much nothing about Vehicle Dynamics in the first place, still is ready to spit on anything but that one sim he thinks is gods answer to the genre. Nearly always not because he thinks it drives realistic but because, and that is the most common reason, someone on the internet that says he is racing for real said it's no good. Well there are enough other ppl that race in real life and have a different and more sophisticated opinion. Because that's the thing with opinions everyone has one. Quite a few ppl that race in real life can enjoy pCARS, we have 2-3 in our community that are actively racing or were very engaged into doing track days. Also there are several professional drivers that can enjoy pCARS too. Ben Collins and Rene Rast are two of them. And Ben Collins drove nearly everything that has wheels and is fun or expensive. From my contacts to race engineers I can tell you that most race drivers have little knowledge about Vehicle Dynamics, it's something that they do, but not deeply understand. Some drivers can give great feedback, other drivers don't notice the change of kinematics on the rear axis. We are talking about Professional Race drivers here that have more than 8 years experience. Because of that, you mentioning someone that does amateur racing for 8 years doesn't impress me a bit. But well no matter what, the "hardcore simracer" can always relay on that one random opinion that he likes most. You say I don't deserve to know what a *really good* sim is. First thing, that attitude is what stops ppl from joining or enjoying sim racing. Because way too many (wannabe) hardcore sim racer experts wear their nose so high up they are breathing thin air. It's ppl like you that are hurting the sim racing community more than doing anything good for it. Second, it is childish and embarrassing on top. Third who are you trying to fool? You should have just admitted that you have no sustain knowledge of Vehicle Dynamics and have your opinion from someone on the internet that you adapted your opinion too. You really should try to reduce your negativity, it will not get you anywhere in life. Also saying that a sim-racing game is not a simulation racing game because not all tracks are laser scanned just shows a sad attitude towards fun. The mindset of "If it is not A than I can't possibly enjoy it!" is just so sad and joyless. I nearly feel sorry for you. The only ppl that would really care about that are professional race drivers that are going to race their soon and try to practice the track to perfection. But even that isn't right because a track can get retarmaced or bumps can be milled off from time to time so there is no guarantee that the laser scan is still the current state of the track. However a good simulation will have a good result no matter if the tracks are laser scanned or (not license) fantasy tracks.
look ACC. This guy barely touches the brakes and the car stops as he wants. WHY THE FUCK should i floor the brake pedal to stop both uphill and downhill?
I was toying with the thought that car is standing still and the Earth is moving under it as the track is...anyways, back to reality. Applauding the breaking and cornering. Wish I could something similar in Asetto Corsa.
Magnifique!!! I can only imagine the joy you must have felt pounding this lap in an R8 LMS at one of the best tracks in the world... just beautiful and perfect!! Merci!!!
AESCULAPTORmark3 Max speed is an irrelevant spec in race cars. Literally no race car is set up to accomplish its max speed. Downforce is optimized for each track for minimum lap time. This has little to do with straight line speed. Even at Le Mans.
He only got up to 5th gear along mountain straight before braking for Griffin's. Surprised by that because it's a long straight and has a downhill section.
What a difference with the 291kmh of the world record (Audi, 2018)...will someone beat the world record of 1.59.3 in 12hours race this year? :) Anyway...Outstanding, unbelievable and orgasmic! This track win against everithing else on this earth *_*
Holy ish that was fast. That lil two minutes got my heart pumped up._. I actually got my first SIM, P1 finish recently out at Bathurst. Please check it out if you like. Thanx for the video._. Later on buddy
I don't think a car with downforece like that really would be a good car to learn; cause everything would just be way to fast to even understand what's happening. It's a good car to practice though; to just take everything you do know & push it to greater speeds.
vielen dank rene das du dieses jahr für audi in der dtm an den start gehste ich kenne dich zwar nur von 2 rennen und kann deine leistungen daher nur begrenzt beurteilen aber ich denke du bist ein guter ersatz für mortara und wirst audi dabei unterstützen die markenwertung zu verteitigen denn im 1 rennen an einem kompletten wochenende direkt auf p6 muss erst mal einer nachmachen bei dieser dichte in der dtm ...und der der 1 dislike kam wohl von dem 2 platzierten xD
280km/h - 120km/h in less than two seconds.. absolutely insane.
Easily cracking 3.5g on that brake zone. The meter doesn't have enough to register it - just instant 2g.
Unknown Unwanted yeah it must be absolutely violent. And this isn’t even a full fledged LMP/formula car. I can’t imagine the braking forces those things generate.
@@augustortiz you can look it up... 4-4.5 G in heavy breaking zones for F1 & about the same for prototypes.
I played this track in Real Racing 3 on my phone many times and was braking very late. Was so proud of myself. Until I saw this video.
Jio was a mistake
Lmao if u try breaking this late in RR3 you are definetly crashing.... Only way you're gonna pull this off is if u drive an F1 car in that game
But in RR3 the audi R8 could probably push low 1:40s, maybe even a 30. I've done a 1:38 in the M3 ALMS and I'm shit.
Adamplatz Platz yes of course RR3 is an arcade game after all
@Richard Yin Productions rr3 and sim-racing. Oof
None of the racing games on mobile platform comes as close as a sim-cade,let alone a sim-racing.
If you are impressed with the braking of the Audi, try getting your head around an f1 car.
5g braking performance, 125kg of pressure on pedal for maximum braking effect. Slowing from 210mph into a corner, the driver brakes for 2.09sec, slowing down to 83mph in just 122metres!
Martin brindle has done a lap of the mountain in his Vodafone f1 car its on here. Its crazy fast
nice video. amazing brakes
Krass, Respekt :) was bedeutet die Zahl unter dem Bremsbalken ?
You can clearly see GT3 cars are less restricted than they were say 4 years ago. It is the most popular form of GT racing in this era. Why do we still call them GT3 cars anyway?
It's the braking and turn-in performance that really impress with these things. Especially the approach to turn two, off the crest at McPhillamy Park, and into the Dipper. Just awesome.
The brakes are just ridiculous, some braking at 50m board by Rast here... outrageous!
I'm amazed at the speed it took the dipper.
He goes from 280 km/h to 120 km/h in just 100m at the Chase
Naw, that braking at the chase... So late!
My game, you come down Conrad at this exact speed (same car; Audi V10, 4wd), but you can't brake that late. The kink is the brake point.
@@unknownunwanted1445 the kink is way too early to brake... 150m is average
He brakes VERY late and I don't know how he goes into the turn without losing speed...
solocompetitivo this track is currently one of the main online races in Gran Turismo Sport for the GT3 class and this guy is braking like 50ft/m (whatever the white board units are in) after the braking points
Thats why he is the professional here...
gothops154 GT Sport is fairly unrealistic when it comes to braking actually...they make the brakes work less than they would in real life...which is a bit weird. Officially on games such as iRacing, rFactor 2, or the AC sims you would actually brake a good 50m to 80m after you would in GT Sport. Which these games mentioned are considered by most people who race cars to be the most realistic sims on the market rn.
@@tankiller9638 The braking points in GT Sport are pretty much the same as in the hardcore sims that you mentioned. He doesn't brake like 50m after where you would brake in GT. The top GT Sport drivers also brake extremly late. It's all about skill...
That's F1 category.
0:28 the speed on these curves is unbelievable!
1:06-1:26 is pretty insane too.
How the hell he managed to brake that late is beyond my comprehension
Trailbraking. Just google it.
There is a delay, it is not physically possible with pirelli tyres and this car
I drive on ACC which is the reproduction of Blancpain GT3 with actually the same car, you cannot brake that late and still making the corner
@@PhO3NiX96 it’s called trail braking.
Oh yeah, that's some nasty driving
Wahnsinnige Runde! Da bekommt man ein Dauergrinsen nur beim zusehen :D Mache weiter so! LG rAii
1:46 ... balls of steel ! There's a parachute behind the car ? :p
280 km 30 m before the corner even in simulator gt sport breaks are not that awesome
Marcin Dabrowski GT Sport is not a simulator.
@@grantzkpw i hope u noticed is at 90m and u tried a bad joke ?
@@grantzkpw 90 m, ~270 ft, almost an entire american football field lmfao
Wheel Spin it’s not but it’s not far off.
Holy fuck the grip..
That downhill section was just unreal. So much grip there! Great driving..
The braking at The Chase was crazy. That’s about 50m later than he should be braking in my brain. Lol
Yeah, like in RR3 you'll need to break as soon you enter the chase to hopefully not go straight to the grass
280kmh brakes at 100 sign
Dgisch imagine being a passenger (if that’s possible) in this thing! You’d genuinely believe that you’re going to die
@@steveallen1340 yes surely. I can't believe he brakes that late.
@@djisch There is a delay for sure, I tried on ACC with same car it's impossible even with new bop that has less top speed
@@PhO3NiX96 I can brake at 125 (between the signs) in ACC, but no later (28C track temp, optimum surface). 100 I think is basically impossible.
@@PhO3NiX96 I noticed the delay on sound etc too, it doesn't match the video. Makes it look like he is braking at 50m when it's nearer 100m. Watching all other video's of GT3 cars on this track with very similar lap times shows this video has a delay to sound/info. I also play ACC and it's very close to the other video's with braking points etc, not this one.
Even though the lines are very similar, this beast looks like it's got sooo much more grip than the cars in GT Sport
I think it may have to do with the grip levels falling off harder when you start sliding. Like the tires stick on the road witb a constant amount of grip until it slips once and the whole thing loses ttaction as opposed to video games where they probably slip earlier, but have more traction while sliding. I have no idea why, im just speculating.
Yea i just love only this car in GT sport
The R8 in real life is just as OP as the R8 in gt sport
Real life gt3 much more grip though
it's pretty damn close I think the fastest guy in American region was a 2:01 as well by NICO but with the gtr. It's amazing how close they are in times. I mean we have nothing to lose in a game, we can make risks that in real life could kill is, this lap is insane and at the limit ever corner.
I love this race track. Mount Panorama! ❤
The perfect lap - Ken Miles
Just perfect... Nice driving !
I noticed the telemetry lags for a few tens
Great Driving. That brake display is that Brake torque in NM? Also wow -2.2G under braking. Impressive.
The brake force is messured in Newtons... NM is used for other things like Torque..
C’est qui sont ici grâce à Jacques et Julien 🙌😂
Du hast mein kompletten Respekt.
Auf so einer mega harten Strecke schnell zu fahen und dann noch der schnellste Audi R8 zu sein, da muss man schon Cochones haben.
Daumen Hoch ;)
Very nice lap Rene :)
This game looks so realistic
Thank you very much for this video
Nice lap! Thank you for the little Telemetry in there, very lovely. I will compare it to my speeds in pCARS(2). :)
except project cars is a bad simulator hahah. it is widely known in the sim community as the fakest simulator branded game out there currently available. real sim racers stay the fuck away from that fake shit.
How can that be? AC works by look up tables mostly. If you care you can find explanations by the developer that AC actually doesn't simulate that much.
I use the log data from iRacing and prospect it with MoTeC software, comparing the histogram of steering wheel angle to lateral force, from iRacing to real world data, I have to say iRacing tire physics looks pretty cheap and fake to me. Another point is, it's easy to guess that iRacing tire temperatures are just faked and not simulated based on driving in real time.
To my observation, "sim racers" know very little about proper vehicle dynamic simulation and even less can calculate suspensions. I can and I used an industry level Vehicle Dynamics software. And from that experience and numerous frustrations I can tell you, pCARS is pretty damn good simulation even on industrial level. The suspension in pCARS is properly simulated based on hard points what is accurate for race cars. Road cars have rubber bushings, they are probably not well simulated but that is something that is extremely troublesome to simulated even for car makers and you can be sure that iRacing or AC doesn't even dream about bothering with that. And pCARS tire model with its heat system is ahead of any industrial level Pacejka model.
Just to test your own simulation knowledge, if you never heard the word "Pacejka" before and never worked with a Pacejka model, you can be sure that you do not know much about tire simulation.
There are a few things or rather certain driving situation where it's noticeable that pCARS simulation is missing some delay that in real life is always there due to compliance. Compliance is extremely difficult or extremely CPU costly to simulate in real time! That is the drawback of pCARS simulating so much and not faking results. However even F1 simulators don't simulate chassis compliance properly in real time.
AC doesn't have this problem so much as they by far don't simulate that much and rather fake the result with look up tables that they tweak till the car drives as they think it should. I don't have any hard feelings about that, it's a legitimate approach esp. seeing that desktop pcs don't have infinite cpu power. However it also has drawbacks. In pCARS the devs can put any tire on any car and the simulation will do something with it, sometimes even something very interesting! AC can't do it because any tire change needs tweaking of the look up tables so that the car does what it should do, what can be pretty work intensive.
So in short words, pCARS has a model that simulates the outcome. Put something in on the front and possibly something educative will come out.
AC is all about creating a car behaviour that the devs desire and think it is realistic. They will do and tweak whatever they need until the huge spreadsheets puts out the numbers that make the car drive as they want.
Because of that I'm very surprised any time someone says pCARS is a fake sim because based on the true meaning of simulation AC produces fake results that are tweaked to be as realistic as possible while pCARS actually simulates a lot.
Every time I hear something like that, I'd ask to ask this "widely known sim community" where they get their knowledge of vehicle dynamics simulation from and why they say pCARS it's a fake simulation.
you dont know wtf you are talking about you didnt even mention one of the best Sim racing games in your post. you mentioned asseto and iracing nether witch is good in my opinion. you clearly dont have a clue what the best sim is out there. enjoy your SIMcade game my boy. more then half of the tracks are not even laser scanned. I know guys that have been sim racing for over 8 years and have done amateur racing and they have tried P.cars and they all said it was the fakest sim branded game they ever tried. i am not even gonna read half of that shit you might as well be playing Need for speed. keep kidding yourself . post muted. i am not gonna even mention the good sims you dont deserve to know.
Wow here is someone that is focused on only spreading his buns when doing a post and not contributing anything helpful. It's the sad example of a "sim racer" that thinks he knows everything but knows pretty much nothing about Vehicle Dynamics in the first place, still is ready to spit on anything but that one sim he thinks is gods answer to the genre. Nearly always not because he thinks it drives realistic but because, and that is the most common reason, someone on the internet that says he is racing for real said it's no good.
Well there are enough other ppl that race in real life and have a different and more sophisticated opinion. Because that's the thing with opinions everyone has one. Quite a few ppl that race in real life can enjoy pCARS, we have 2-3 in our community that are actively racing or were very engaged into doing track days. Also there are several professional drivers that can enjoy pCARS too. Ben Collins and Rene Rast are two of them. And Ben Collins drove nearly everything that has wheels and is fun or expensive. From my contacts to race engineers I can tell you that most race drivers have little knowledge about Vehicle Dynamics, it's something that they do, but not deeply understand. Some drivers can give great feedback, other drivers don't notice the change of kinematics on the rear axis. We are talking about Professional Race drivers here that have more than 8 years experience. Because of that, you mentioning someone that does amateur racing for 8 years doesn't impress me a bit.
But well no matter what, the "hardcore simracer" can always relay on that one random opinion that he likes most.
You say I don't deserve to know what a *really good* sim is. First thing, that attitude is what stops ppl from joining or enjoying sim racing. Because way too many (wannabe) hardcore sim racer experts wear their nose so high up they are breathing thin air. It's ppl like you that are hurting the sim racing community more than doing anything good for it. Second, it is childish and embarrassing on top. Third who are you trying to fool?
You should have just admitted that you have no sustain knowledge of Vehicle Dynamics and have your opinion from someone on the internet that you adapted your opinion too.
You really should try to reduce your negativity, it will not get you anywhere in life. Also saying that a sim-racing game is not a simulation racing game because not all tracks are laser scanned just shows a sad attitude towards fun. The mindset of "If it is not A than I can't possibly enjoy it!" is just so sad and joyless. I nearly feel sorry for you. The only ppl that would really care about that are professional race drivers that are going to race their soon and try to practice the track to perfection. But even that isn't right because a track can get retarmaced or bumps can be milled off from time to time so there is no guarantee that the laser scan is still the current state of the track.
However a good simulation will have a good result no matter if the tracks are laser scanned or (not license) fantasy tracks.
Rene Rast knows more about racing than any racing games player. Go away.
Best of 5 Laps Bathurst Audi R8 LMS >> th-cam.com/video/E3GRTnerhM8/w-d-xo.html
Amazing
Highest speed: 282 km/h
Slowest speed: 77 km/h
Times under 100 km/h: 3
Fuck that's faster than I would normally drive...
Do drivers like racing this course? It's a bit of a headache...
Just curious... Why did the number 11 (14?) car pull left just after Turn 10. Are there secondary pits at Panorama?
look ACC. This guy barely touches the brakes and the car stops as he wants. WHY THE FUCK should i floor the brake pedal to stop both uphill and downhill?
Well.... now i just figured out i been doing Bathurst wrong on ACC and could easily shave at least 2 seconds off my lap time. Glad i found this
I was toying with the thought that car is standing still and the Earth is moving under it as the track is...anyways, back to reality. Applauding the breaking and cornering. Wish I could something similar in Asetto Corsa.
I wonder how much your heart beat rate was during that lap! Superb !
My heart rate went up and I was just watching the video :O Amazing stuff
Usually sits around 120 - 135 BPM. Motocross riders sit at about 150 BPM, but that's for shorter periods. So that's pretty impressive.
But it is not the fastest lap with an AUDI R8 GT3. Christopher Mies was faster in 2018 with 1:59:30
Know this track with off by heart because of Gran Turismo Sport!!
If this was project cars etc his fov would be a lot wider than all those fuckin calculators would say,I knew they were wrong
That fucking compressor, fuck it’s annoying
Magnifique!!! I can only imagine the joy you must have felt pounding this lap in an R8 LMS at one of the best tracks in the world... just beautiful and perfect!! Merci!!!
Imagine doing that for several hours at a time, yikes!
*Rene Fast*
He was on a mission
What is this bröööö background noise after he shifts
Wow! just awesome
Wow the polling rate on the telemetry is dreadful
What's the fastest v8 supercar lap for this track?
Good graphics, but physics is too arcady 🗿
Mega geile Runde, geile Strecke, geiles Auto, geiler Fahrer! 🔥
What force is the number under the brake bar measuring in?
Mental circuit. Awesome.
Someone remind me why we even bother watching V8 supercars again? Insane!
It’s mount panorama in real racing three
Is that brake read out on a scale of 0-100% pedal travel or is it pressure based etc?
Trailbraking master
this is extreme
I like this lap! Thanks, René!
Is this a real car or forza or something
All those serpentines at 100+ oof
Those corner speeds are absolutely insane.
Milton drive in carx drift racing
Rene, which game is this? :)
Big balls game ;)
Rene Rast holy shit😹 Ehre genommen
Give it another 5 years and games will look like this😉
@@FullFledged2010 to be fair, the camera quality is average. Games already look like this
@@RastRene lol big ego accurate for a big driver
Verstappen was faster last weekend!
Like GTS ... unbelievable
450kms on conrod oh geez
Why would you dislike this?
Is this real or GT Sport??
Fantastic !!! The car looks glued to the track. What would be the top speed of the Audi r8 gt3 ? In mph.
audi r8 top speed 280-290 kmh
Bajwa Prabpreet Singh 300+ you mean
@@Kevin_VER i mean the gt3 car on that track 😂
AESCULAPTORmark3 Max speed is an irrelevant spec in race cars. Literally no race car is set up to accomplish its max speed. Downforce is optimized for each track for minimum lap time. This has little to do with straight line speed. Even at Le Mans.
He only got up to 5th gear along mountain straight before braking for Griffin's. Surprised by that because it's a long straight and has a downhill section.
These cars are very much underpowered. The restrictions on engine power Vs downforce really shows up on this track.
FAt out through the mountain next time ☺️☺️☺️☺️
sound is off delete
The brakes on these cars are insane
This is beautiful
Great Lap!
İs it mile or km?
Mount panorama
mount panorama
¿Qué juego es?
Don't blink!
Takes me back to my Real Racing 3 days 😁
Richard Hasal haha, same here
Its been 3 years since I last playing
2.73 G. Fuck
ダウンヒルすごい
Das kann ich auch ,aber nu bei rFactor2 :-)
Caraio!
What a difference with the 291kmh of the world record (Audi, 2018)...will someone beat the world record of 1.59.3 in 12hours race this year? :)
Anyway...Outstanding, unbelievable and orgasmic! This track win against everithing else on this earth *_*
I am 10 second faster than this. But in real racing 3
unfassbar :-) Top fahrer, top auto!!
Barely dipped below 100km/h on the dipper. Insane. Agree with others, super late braking but really looked smooth.
Their breaks compared to the v8 supercars. Because the v8 do 290-300 down conrod but are 10 sec slower insane.
Sehr gut!
Really wish all the Project Cars vids showed the brake/accelerator indicators like this too.
Holy ish that was fast. That lil two minutes got my heart pumped up._. I actually got my first SIM, P1 finish recently out at Bathurst. Please check it out if you like. Thanx for the video._. Later on buddy
God i love this track so much
Brakes and grip are INSANE. I need this for my smalls country/mountain roads...
Pity these cars are so restricted in engine power. There's so much performance in braking and grip, they could do so much more in terms of laptime.
I don't think a car with downforece like that really would be a good car to learn; cause everything would just be way to fast to even understand what's happening. It's a good car to practice though; to just take everything you do know & push it to greater speeds.
vielen dank rene das du dieses jahr für audi in der dtm an den start gehste ich kenne dich zwar nur von 2 rennen und kann deine leistungen daher nur begrenzt beurteilen aber ich denke du bist ein guter ersatz für mortara und wirst audi dabei unterstützen die markenwertung zu verteitigen denn im 1 rennen an einem kompletten wochenende direkt auf p6 muss erst mal einer nachmachen bei dieser dichte in der dtm ...und der der 1 dislike kam wohl von dem 2 platzierten xD
Heute 4 Jahre später 3 dtm Titel auf dem Konto ...hab ich wohl nicht so falsch gelegen