ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ก.ย. 2024
- Frames per second, or FPS, gets talked about a lot. But does frame rate matter? Is there a best frame rate? Do you ever ask yourself how frame rate affects gameplay? Watch Gameranx for the answers to these questions and more...
Subscribe for more: / gameranxtv
My computer is so good I can run Undertale at a solid 30 fps
A Barrel of Fun my computer is so good that it runs games like dota 2 at 7 fps with the lowest settings there possibly are.T_T
At the resolution of 640*480
A Barrel of Fun whaddaya have?
I run an old imac under bootcamp on windows 7, you
A Barrel of Fun fuck you my computer is better i play roblox on 12 fps
Kitzey YaBoi fuck you, my pc runs the marathon
Next consoles should target high framerate instead of fake 4k.
Next consoles should target the creation of new IPs and make good exclusives.
If you give a shit about graphics go PC.
Riley Kard exclusives are stupid and divide people
Riley Kard i DON'T care about high graphics that's why I want them to target high framerate :)
EK Exclusives are the only reason there's a videogame industry these days.
No exclusives, no competition, no competition, no investments in new IPs and new technologies, like VR, motion plus, the switch hybrid style, etc.
Gabriele Mucci Ikr. idk why people give a fuck about graphics so much. I prefer gameplay over graphics any day. So long as the graphics are tolerable, I don't have an issue
Hi, my name is Falcon and here on Stock Footage we are asking the question, how many still pictures of Xbox 360 controllers can we shove into a 15 minute TH-cam video.
Lol
Senior Frig it was 7 minutes, but true lol
tru bathtub bois kek or, your just too stupid to understand the content? definitely a possibility!
Video editing?
*you're
so much for the stupid part c:
> *uploads video about the importance of high framerate*
>In 30fps or lower
Pizza Rat what A meme
You don´t need higher fps in videos. 30 fps or even lower is fine, isn´t it?
In first person shooters and some other games that are fast paced require 60+ fps, when being competitive, more than 60. In a video, does not matter. The output is clear anyways.
Pizza Rat he did infact talk about the importance of framrate in a game and why it is okay in a video/film
but nice meme bro
I was about to comment about that.
Why are fps important in video games? Why is breathing air so important for life? We may never know the answer to these questions...
Skuma ! Because life on earth had to adapt to the earths atmosphere. You dumb fuck. And without fps, how do you think games would work?
Joosua got baited lol
Joosua3 GT calm down son, he's only trolling 🤣
Christian Riddler rawr XD
Skuma !
why are we living if we are gonna die right.?
instead of making 4k consoles that runs like shit(30FPS) They should make consoles that can run ultra 1080p @ 60fps.
Lol consoles can't render games in true 4k, they just upscale the frames. Also, games sometimes run at 720p.
Me who cares 300$(console)>1000$(@60fps) anytime
the way the ps4 pro is made is upscaled 1080p to 4k at 30 fps. Only playstation titles are confirmed for upscaled 4k 30 fps. So all 1080p games will most likely run between 50-60 fps. Same with the Xbox scorpio however, the scorpio runs native 4k (real 4k) and will run from 30-40 fps, and all 1080p games will then be processed to (like the pro) 50-60 fps.
4k is a myth. Only 3.84k is available.
Roxor128 you right
One thing I hate for FPS in some games is when you turn off Vsync but the game feels worse without it somehow, and your PC uses up more RAM, CPU, and GPU.
Or when the FPS counter says it's 60 but it feels like 40.
Braveo capt here. arguably the most important part of fps is not the average but rather the frame timings. when you disable vsync 2 things generally happen 1) frame rate and frame timings can vary drastically causing the "its over 60 but feels like 30" effect and 2) the game running at a faster fps means it uses more resources and it not limited by the vsync governor.
To me vsync adds a lot of input lag. And sometimes my FPS takes a hit in places it wouldn't if it was turned off. Downside is screen tearing but I just bought a 144hz monitor. My FPS in games like GTA 5 is usually around 90 and higher in some other games so it's fine :)
It's why I'm saving up for a better monitor with Gsync or FreeSync.
The only problem that i have with Vsync is when it goes from solid 60 frames to 59, it feels like its slowmo 10 fps.
Might just be me.
I always turn off motion blur, it just gives me a headache
My thinking about motion blur is a bit fucking.
Well just assume that we are playing games without motion blur and getting headache per day every day dosen't it will adapt us for critical situation in real life where we can face a headache kind of situation and also it will make us more intelligent. As we are giving an intense workout to our brain. Yes! gamers are the most intelligent species on the planet yes!
I turn it off since it helps me play better instead of having half my screen a blur where I can't see people in the corners of my screen.
BrownxtigerZz agreed, it makes my eyes water up and go all red.. and yeah a massive headache, expecially if its First person shooters.
same , motion blur also gave me peasantry
BrownxtigerZz Actually Motion blur can look really nice and doesn't give u a headache. It should not be too strong
To all the people saying graphics don't matter. Yes! it fucking does, but not at the expenses of gameplay and story.
wrong video m8
el doggo true
Graphics are important Certainly more important than frame rates, Dropping Graphical Quality Just to Get few Extra Frame makes all that striving to Create a Believe world a waste of time,It may Give you an Edge so you can Win,To me winning is secondary to Being in Believeable World
Lee Bennett modern day games are designed to be beautiful at medium to high settings. Ultra is just some barely nicer textures, sharper edges and more objects. So, unless the settings are low, graphics aren't obstructed much
Do you not understand opinions? It's not a fact like how your implying, for me if the graphics are as good as something like Skyrim I'm fine, I could go the rest of my life with those graphics, but according to you that's impossible.
Dude have you ever seen a 144hz screen? You can most definitely tell the difference.
once you try 144hz, you can never go back..
Yeah day and night. *cries in overclocked 75 Hz panel*
Haha 1080p peasant
the normies cap at 60hz/fps like their iq (that's why they always say you dont need over 60fps) go for the 144hz monitors don't be a normie
Yo @Type 40 fyi 144hz is not the same as 1080 p
P are pixels for crying out loud
Me: can I have a higher frame rate computer?
Computer: lol wut? 13 fps? ok
your computer is a dick
Yo, mine says 5fps... at lowest video settings
How Kyle Gautschy should be: Man my computer sucks, it can only play games with 13 fps. I should buy a new computer and not bother anyone with my problems
Liam Walsh why are you being stupid? Clearly he was telling a joke not complaining
Ahh it was a joke. haha...
When you get stable 100FPS in DOOM ultra but struggle to get stable 40FPS in Garfield Kart
laughs in 240hz monitor
how do you know? xd
www.asus.com/us/Monitors/ROG-SWIFT-PG258Q/
Asus has a 240Hz 1080p, 1ms monitor, why can't he have the same?
Oliver Page *cries in 120hz monitor*
@ss1 Your old.
Talks about framerates, doesn't have 60 frames on the video
Fox_Of_Steel are you mental
are you dumb??
savage
Fox_Of_Steel Why would he need 60fps on this video?
jezzz, he is just troling
trying to imagine lag in a VR game.
Nero Freeman it turns into horror game
your brain melts
Noah Freeman try to imagine falling thro the floor :D
VR games have to be played at at least 90fps or else it would induce motion sickness
I have a vive an can confirm, while my vrheadset is always running at 90fps the game itself can dip below in some games and the difference between the two causes the motion sickness
I remember playing games at a whopping 10-15 fps and thought it was amazing. Now that it's 2017, I go back to those games at a solid 60 fps and was speechless.
And here we are 4 years later playing Console at 120fps
Why is gameranx important
Make a video about it
Game theory is gameranx just watchmojo
+PhrozenFox That was a doozy of a comment.
[They are that, just this.]
nah, they aren't scrapping the bottom of the barrel remotely near that level
LazyReaper who said they were
But the video isn't rendered in 60 fps :c
Oh
My
GAWD!!!!!
)^•^(
stop watching in 360, 480,(or even 144 pixels)
Xan Saibot What's your point? The video is rendered in 30fps no matter what resolution you set it at.
Xan Saibot whats your point?
how u gonna prove it
Most people who trivialize 60fps have never played games at 60fps before.
It's almost a little sad when people say that 60 FPS doesn't matter. Like, TH-cam even supports 60 FPS now, and those same people haven't seen the difference by now?
"It doesn't matter" means "it is not relevant like the way you say it is".
I've played in 60 fps many times. My GTX690 may not be a great card but its still good enough to run things on high settings. I don't have a single problem in the world playing an FPS like Doom on my PC and then playing Destiny on MY PS4 right afterward. A poor carpenter blames the tools. I think its pretty sad that you criple yourselves because you notice such a difference.
Chaosdirge me too, I run games on my pc at 100fps or more or less depending on the game obviously. And I play on my Xbox at 30fps and I'm fine with it.
if only they could see what we see
2:06 are you kidding me? have you been on a 120/144hz monitor ever? it's like mistaking a horse for a mosquito - you can't.
I was personally amazed when I switched to a 144 hz monitor. Night and day.
ayy lmao when I turn v sync off, my screen tears loads... why?
ayy lmao well maybe you are just imagining it
+Rune Thyselius yeah sure 144hz is a money scam.. how about you actually try it before telling me that i'm dumb?
+Tommy Robinson are you on 60hz or 120/144hz? it happens when your framerate is higher than your monitor's refresh rate. freesync really helps with that - it's a game-changer if you are on 144hz and can't get 144fps in all games. even 80fps seems smooth like that.
silky smooth 5 frames per second for doom on my pc 😎
go work and get a real pc
Go look up "joke" on google
Same tried demo. Was lucky to even get 10FPS
60fps minimum on mine by default
ajay pratap singh sengar reported
your brain stops telling the difference at 60fps... stopped the video there. wrong. Get a 144hz monitor and get back to me.
they is a huge difference between something like 60fps to 90fps
bruv i bet you're Muslim, change that name of yours, it's wack af
wrong and fuck you. make me.
I was about to go on a rant about this. Thank you good sir.
its what I'm here for.
As long as it's not like a slide show I'm fine
spoken like a true p
But Edupes Isn't that technically what it is?
Shot fired against Potato 4
But Edupes this is what we say to ourselves to sleep at night.
But Edupes anything less than 60 is a slideshow
I didn't know that the cinema was 24 frames
five seven G some movies (like The Hobbit) are 48 fps
five seven G movies have motion blur due to how cameras work so it's not that bad. Just take a panning camera scene from any movie and it turns into a smudge until the camera stops. If it was recorded with 60 fps you would have seen every detail in the screen during panning. It's especially important for movies in 3d.
Haohmaru HL That's going to depend on shutter speed, aka how much light is let in for each frame. 120 shutter speed at 24 frames will look choppy and have little blur, (Saving Private Ryan intro) but 58 at 24 will look very close to human eye specs etc.
I believe they usually do it so save disk space without compression. 20fps will in theory have 1/3 data of a 60fps video
who plays with motion blur? i think it is very uncomfortable
Alex ChinChinChin Motion blur on doom really hurts my eyes for some reason.
you need it at 24fps. But you should never play at 24fps :p
well i dont do that because it is irritating😂XD
unless u play arma 3 with like 30 gigs of mods like me :D
(god has abandoned me please help)
I like it most of the time. It does get touchy sometimes though
60 fps should become the standard for every game out there, consoles are capable of 60 fps too (last of us remastered, battlefield 1) but instead go graphics over framerate, sad really
i think if they went frames over graphics, i think the existing games would look like ass. i would rather have an amazing looking game at acceptable fps, than a shoddy looking game at 60 fps.
Battlefield 1 had around 35-42 and only on small Maps on low pop Servers is went up to 60. Last of Us Remaster also had huge drops in some Areas.
karpfenaut totally agree with you, especially when interacting with ppl in online games.
Why not just get rid of anti-consumer consoles and go all PC
karpfenaut consoles have been capable of 60fps since the nentendo 64 why is it not the standard
People adapt to higher quality. It's simple as that. Back in the day, 30 fps was acceptable...then again...so was 360p acceptable just a couple years ago.Then you start watching 720p, and you then 360p is no longer acceptable.
I an a cheap ass, so I intentionally stay behind the curve on graphics options so that I not only get the most performance possible, but also have that performance come at a cheap cost (ie the hardware for my computer), and it looks good *enough* for me.
SangoProductions213 of course it looks good enough for you... but do not tell ppl it is better or even the same.
60 FPS has been the gaming standard for like for like 30-40 years so you must be pretty old then.....
It's on the internet so it must be true.
deadwolf1227 Wow, since the 70s and 80s we've been at 60 fps huh? What a crock of shit.
MrBoggy101 fighting games? yeah sure that needs higher than 40 at least. but most other games? i doubt it
i can run cs go @ 60 spf. (seconds per frame)
GOOD ONE
HAHAHAHA! I pity you
rixterz Seriosly? How old you are?
rixterz it's a joke idiot
rixterz just stop
some dumb people say that 30 fps is the the same as 60fps
kevin_nahuel2010 60:30=2, it is 2 times better, you stupid.
This Guy Did you even read his comment, you stupid
StriKer Jake I can run tf2 with 200+ fps ^_^
Fussions Dayum
700+ highest
6:35 I like that the photo of the low end PC haves a Corsair 1000 watts power supply :P
It looks like my pc.I have a beast of pc and is in 20 year old open box and looks like shyte.
Room for upgrading in the future :D
It looks like they're stealing internet or cable from the neighbors
Vaggelis Senpai Desu thats one hell of a sleeper pc
Good eye you have. Probably can see over 240fps
Actually the brain can tell a difference between 60 and 144Hz, The human brain can actually subconsciously perceive up to 1000 frames per second, after a quick search i found this response, and considering there has been real military tests conducted on such things I am inclined to believe the following statement "Although the human eye and brain can interpret up to 1000 frames per second, someone sitting in a chair and actively guessing at how high a framerate is can, on average, interpret up to about 150 frames per second.
The point: 60 fps is not a 'waste'"
Kasai Brightwater Finally, someone who isn't just saying "I have a 144hz monitor, I can tell" someone with some level of research. Can you send me a link?
Kasai Brightwater Bro you literally just quoted a World of Warcraft forum.
BlazerManiacNumber96 I know, but it's true information and I brought a better link that's more credible and actually explains it.
Kasai Brightwater I'm not saying the info isn't true. Just that you should quote some medical or scientific source, not a WoW forum.
BlazerManiacNumber96 secondary source
i like how this video is 30 fps
Refresh rate
I get a cinematic 13 fps on half life 2 on my new pc
Hacked by Scarce cute doggy
Haru Yanto Just realized it was a dog XD
Back in 2010 I had a laptop from 08 and I could only play Half Life 2 at 12fps at 600p with all the settings on low. It had only 64mb of vram and 2GB of system ram and it was paired with Vista Basic. Hard times were hard.
Jealous
i have pc from 2009,60 fps max settings in hl2.
I always disable motion blur.
Same
Early? I need to make a joke.
Gaming Ultra High Graphics on MacBook Pro
Great Gaming well at least you tried
I don't have a mac or a great computer but I understood it XD.
You need to play on a MacBook Air. SO much better.
BUUUAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!!!
zahir bashir i know right! Hell we might even get over 80 fps on ULTRA-ultra High Settings Graphics!
when skyrim came out i loved it so much i finished the entire game with less than 30fps with an average about 18 - 24fps while my PC is begging for mercy
240-260 FPS is where most humans can't differentiate between the frame rate and the speed of light. I personally see a huge difference between 60 and 100Hz, but everyone's different.
Healthy humans should definitely be able to distinguish 60 and 100hz quite easily.
Quackstorm Exactly! There is a huge difference between 60hz and 144hz display. 60hz feels really bad with a mouse. 144hz and above is amazing
D-Pad I wouldn't call 60Hz very bad, it's fine IMHO but everyone has their preferences.
Also let me point out that although the difference between 60Hz and 100Hz is very noticeable in my eyes, the difference between that and 240Hz is not nearly as noticeable. Although I understand the everyone has their own personal preferences, saying that there is no difference between 60Hz and 144Hz probably means that you need to have your eyes checked.
The human brain can process up to 1000fps. But if you're just plopped in front of a TV and asked to guess what the fps is, you'd probably stop being accurate after around 150fps. But if you put, say, 240fps and 600fps games side by side, you would notice the difference.
Our brain will never have the ability to "see" things at the speed of light. The electrical signals in our brain ARE fast but not THAT fast.
Mr Brick There is nothing that moves at the speed of light but light, and you can see light ... so yeah
DelgaDude yet that does not necessarily mean that the signals in our brain move at the speed of light, other wise that would break newtons laws
*einsteins laws
Mr Brick That means you don't see it in an instant but you still see it.
DelgaDude Fair, but not at the speed of light
as someone who plays on a 144hz monitor I can say definitively that the difference of 90fps and 60fps is drastically noticeable. When you go from 60hz to 144hz or even the 240hz panels its just absurdly noticeable.
Haz-Matt even on a 75hz monitor that I used to play on. The difference between 60 and 75 is markedly different.
i concur, thats why im shocked as what this falcon cat is talking about.
Yup 144hz is eye opening
Haz-Matt your right the difference between 60 and 75 is like night and day when your playing a game, and that is from experience. But I will say that going from 60 to 75 just feels nicer while going from 60 to 120 (or even 90) can or will effect your gameplay.
I second that, good sir.
Stopped the video when he said humans can only see 60fps.
Ken Smith He said people can't tell the difference when it's above 60fps but the human brain can see at a much higher frame rate.
And if you were making a joke then I just got nae nae'd.
Duke Dragon the human brain doesn't have eyes. If you can't notice a difference above 60 fps there is something wrong.
is this a joke.. I hope..?
My post?
Bat Orgil Actually the lower the fps the more frames you skip meaning you can be attacked a second after you realise you're being attacked this means you won't be able to block or counter attack.
Virtual reality experts seem to think 90hz is the important frame rate to hit.
90 or higher. you actually get motion sickness if its under it, well from my own experience i can tell you that.
I think the higher framerate is just to reduce the render lag a bit which is what i think mainly causes the motion sickness. Something could render at 1million fps but if it has a 5 second delay every time ur head moves it will still be heavily disorienting.
Tylo Render lag? Lol. No.
That's not because of FPS...
Awesome! are you unfamiliar with the term? it is fairly simple and common... i take you've never played a buffered pvp game like on an emulator before? render lag is the offset between the start and end times of a render loop but most people colloquially use it to refer to the interval between their inputs and the perceived visual response from the game. in the case of VR like oculus and vive they have a considerable lag between the moment you turn your head and the time it takes to render the new spot your looking at. happy to help you learn!
I can play games at 10 fps on my potato pc... I think there is something wrong with me.
Look up a guy called LowSpecGamer. He makes videos on getting good fps on low end pc(like mine)
I can play a game from anything above 15-20 fps
been playing dark souls 1, with a keyboard only, at 11 fps . my friend says i should go to a crazy home . but i like the game
Playing Rise of the Tomb Raider at 10FPS. Feels normal to me. lol Guess I've just adapted.
cause you don't want to be hit with a slide show when your I the middle of a battle
1:16 I love the little PC Master Race guy coming in and correcting it to 120 FPS XD
5:07 24fps is basically the industry standard because it's the bare minimum framerate before things start to lose fluidity. Lower framerate = less film used = money saved. Most things shot digitally are 30fps these days.
Heck most "encoded" videos are 23.97 SD/HD.
24 fps makes editing much easier and faster. But i think they may edit in higher frame rates so the result is pretty perfect
It's because 24fps is awesome and faster framerates look like soap operas
Imagine how amazing games like Halo Reach would play at 60fps
I love them all in their own way,even Halo 5
*Clenches In Preparation of Console 30fps noobs getting butthurt
I iz a Pikachu *clenches in preparation of the children who uses their parents money to buy a pc just to play Minecraft*
Cinema standard 24fps is set that way because the motion blur it creates is the most natural looking to the human eye. When things reach 30fps or higher in video, things look unnaturally smooth and fluid. When you wave your hand back and fourth in front of your face, your fingers will blur at a consistency that's virtually the same as a 24fps video. Or if you look straight out of the side window of a highspeed moving vehicle. The trees on the side of the road will blur. They won't be perfectly smooth like a 60 or 90 fps video.
That's why it's chosen for film. Because it's the most natural looking. HOWEVER, obviously for video games, the higher frame rate makes sense. Things need to be more fluid for that, as he already explained in the video.
But a higher frame rate for film is unnatural, and the only reason we still shoot films at 24fps is because of that reason. Not because it's been a standard like that for so long like you said.
What is porn and why is it the most important entertainment medium ever
Make that video
Teaches how you can help the human race.
Have you seen porn in 4K?
4k? nahhhh bro 5.2k 60fps on oled vr hedset
Hah, you think porn is the most "important"...
How old are you, 12?
TinchoX you're 12 if you don't realize how big the porn industry is
What kinda question is that? Yes Its VERY important
I'm a simple man, I see Kratos I click like
Prior to sound in film, most frame rates for cinema were around 12fps. This frame rate was decided on as it provided the least amount of perceptible flicker for the amount of film used (film was expensive). Once sound was introduced, a minimum of 24fps was required in order to achieve synchronous sound.
That is why you have 24fps in movies. Most films today are shot digitally using an Arri Alexa camera whose frame rate is 24fps.
Today sound sync does not require 24fps to be achieved - It is used today because it is what audiences are used to. Movies could be shot at 60fps today but the look is so different that filmmakers shy away from it in the event it has a negative effect on the financial performance of a film.
24fps is a known entity. Hollywood is not known for it's enthusiasm for risk taking.
Great video Falcon.
Last time I was this early... No-one said "First" when they clicked on a TH-cam video
First!
It's Me AwesomeGaming Last time I was this early, people didn't make these stupid fucking comments.
ok cool so you were never early?
my PC is neither it is potato end
jeremy stoelting high five! though im more of a french fry kind of pc
Sonicfrais Heya mine is full on mashed
Billy without potatoes where would've been..
I think you might find LowSpecGamer helpful
jeremy stoelting Hey, if it's enough to store GlaDOS' entire AI, it should work just fine, right?
Uhm... the brain can send electric signals around about 1000 times a second, which means that is the max FPS any human can see at any given time
Jens Munkerud I imagine that might be a bit variable though....some people might have it at 1001 right? maybe im wrong but I think when we eventually get the processing power we should push past 1000 just to be sure.
i heard it somewhere that it is around 1000, yes it may vary i dont really know...
The brain can, sure. But *you,* sitting in front of a screen, wouldn't be able to tell the difference between 500 and 1000. We top out at the 150-200 range.
matt4045 I think I heard it might top out around 300 because jet pilots can tell the make and model of a plane at about that speed I think.
+jet100a it is all relative to training. if you spend time watching variable framerates your brain will dedicate more resources to future attempts and you'll find the differences slightly more noticeable. video game players can guess a framerate much better than non-video game players, for obvious experience-based reasons.
Happy with my 1080ti and 144Hz G-Sync monitor. Shout out to my PC Master Race homies.
If you don't ever drop below 144 fps G-Sync is basically useless...You could get a bit less lag with it off and if you can run games at 300+ fps a bit less time between latest frame rendered and latest frame displayed...Before you call out screen tearing as long as you are around 300 fps it is basically nonexistent, although truthfully I have not experienced any screen tearing after getting a 144hz monitor no matter the frame rate.
Its a 1440P monitor, and while 50% games hit the 144HZ (or 165 if i set it to that). I do play harder hitting titles, and maxed out games like wildlands, MEA, and such will vary 80-120. Gsync is well worth it.
Ok that makes more sense, at the lower frames Gsync and Freesync make a huge difference. Still if you want to get a bit less by way of input lag on fps games like csgo that run at really high framerates on good hardware you can turn off gsync to lower input lag as Gysnc and Freesync do add quite a bit of input lag. There wont be much in the way of tearing provided you can run around 300-500 fps. I did use freesync for a while when I play harder to run games and it does make a difference.
what monitor are you using if i may ask?
Acer predator 27" IPS 165hz with gsync
try to play fallout4 on ps4 you will hate your life because fps is like 15
عبدالرحمن الشالاتي lair. my friend play it on ps4 completely fine.
No it's so bad compared to games like bf1, you can't play a first person shooter with 15 frame rate or less
عبدالرحمن الشالاتي i saw my friend playing completely fine
hiwa doski I don't know if you and your friend are blind or if you are gamers at all
hiwa doski look at all the other games like bf1 or gta5 it look so good but fallout4 can't be played on ps4 it's just a pc game
dunno how some people in the comments don't get it. I'll try to dumb it down. If it's a high paced game to begin with you'd want it smooth and responsive so you can enjoy it more. if it's some slow strategy or turn based game or a game not very action focused, the framerate's don't matter as much. sitting there playing a fast paced game that can't hold a solid, stable performance is like driving a Lamborghini that has its engine randomly shut off and turn back on while trying to go full speed down a clear straightway. From a gamer perspective it leads to the gamer being more furstrated with the game for lagging during a crucial moment making them start over a difficult fight or level rather than just being angry at themselves for messing up. It's not fun.
I'm just a "gameplay first" kind of person if all a game has to offer is story with mediocre gameplay, I'll just go watch a movie instead. I have no problem turning stuff down in settings just to make sure the game runs well, even if my machine is above its requirements. If developers were actually better about working on performance instead of graphical fluff on console or in general for that matter; so games wouldn't struggle and hardly ever keep stability My PS4 and old 360 would have a larger library right now. I mean seriously, what's the point of locking a game at 30 FPS if it's still going to tank well below that randomly while playing (talking close to slow mo camera here)? o_O
fps always matters. there is no excuse
Rez996 this guy, this guy right here this guy is the man
30fps just sucks. No way around it. Argue anything you want. It sucks. Even 24fps in movies are getting noticeable. 60-75fps/hz is pleasant. Anything above 100hz is awesome. Your eyes just relax soooo much it's weird, and you do 100% *notice* it.
MistahMOB I can't watch movies because of them being capped at 24fps
the problem I have with this video is I didn't improve on my computer.
as you see, us people who have a bad PC we don't have FPS.
We have SPF
Because it looks better, duh. Next.
Moon basically yes
So basically, Suns is a total hottie. Gorgeous gamer girl.
yep
I can't play first person games at less than 60fps without either having to take Dramamine or ending up with motion sickness. Right now I'm waiting on a new power supply for my PC so that I can update my 7 year old GPU so that I get better frame rates. As for going beyond 60fps I really can't tell the difference between 60 and 100 too much. Neurologist say that it takes about 0.25 seconds for an impulse to travel down and cause a reaction in your hand, which is why muscle memory and practice is so important to people like gamers and musicians. Something I've said for a while when concerning hardware when the PS4 Pro, and Scorpio started talking about 4K gaming is that they need to get consistent 60fps at 1080P before trying to go up in resolution.
wow amazing
I'm not low end nor high end, i'm potato end...
FPS is important in CSGO and Arma...
But games like Skyrim (I get around 40-50) and is because of shit ton of mods, but i still love it:D
Quantum dude same
in skyrim it does not really matter if you get 40-50 its not a fps and its clocked at 60 for some reason
Actually its not... Who tf plays Skyrim on PC without mods!
Yes im noob because i play skyrim with mods gg
LOL, Original Skyrim without vSync causes physics problems that why it's capped at 60. Doesn'tmatter if you have the best computer in the world, the physics and lighting fucks up on high fps.
why is oxygen important, wtf is this video lol
paris delis stfu u peasanr
A video they wanted to make...
I just want to know how gamers can sometimes tell what is the framerate for a game....without a program that tells you. I also often confused lag and framerate saying "well they are the same thing since if your internet is slow then your framerate drops."
1. we get use to it, and know the difference 2. low fps is consistent, but lag is sudden. like you are playing a 60fps, but suddenly it drop to 15fps, and after a sec, it goes back to 60, that is lag
it's relative,if you're used to 60fps,going to 24 will be horrible but if you stay at 24,going to 60fps you won't feel any difference until you go back to 24.same as 144fps to 60fps
60fps looks pretty bad to me after i upgraded to a 1440p 144hz monitor even just mouse movement is wierd at 60hz
and 30fps is just unplayable
i hope you're trolling otherwise educate yourself
StormKiller hahaha its science mate *truth sucks*
TheFeadme the eye doenst work like a camera it does not see only 30 fps thats just a myth created by console Players so they dont envy the 6ü/144f fps of the pc Players
TheFeadme
Actually scientists found out that our brains stop perceiving better smoothness in frame rates close to 1000.
Sub Zero
You are either a terrible troll or a very stupid person.
I wish I could strap a VR to someone's head with superglue at 26 fps to whoever's saying "26 fps is the limit of what the human eye can see" so that I could laugh as he throws up everywhere
I'm used to 11 fps, but when it drops to 7 and 8 i just start losing my mind.
as a professional gamer, a minimum of 120FPS is a MUST for me. i can instantly spot the difference between a 60/120 Hz monitor. Once i upgraded to the 144hz monitor i have now, there is no way i could go back to 60
PreM_RL "Professional gamer". Oh god if that isn't the cringiest thing i've read all day I don't know what is.
HAHAHAHAHHAHA yea as i was typing it i was like, oh god. but i didnt know what else to say it so xDDD
Professional gamer... has no youtube vids
"Proffesional gamer" has all rocket league content
yea, im a professional Rocket League player
I love the 24 fps in movies, gives it a surreal feeling. When you see the 'behind the scenes footage' at 60 fps it looks jarring.
"but but the human brain can't see beyond 30 fps..."
30fps or over
It looks sober
20 or lower
Game over
20-30FPS?
Navon Myhand 20-30 It kinda looks dirty
+SAAVY Gaming True.
sweet rhymes ma boy
***** yeah there's nothing really wrong with 30fps. As long as its playable or doesn't make me feel sick I'm ok
I never knew fps made a difference between action in games. I thought it was only the amount of fps lag or well the smoothness of the movement in game. So actually while I played that mmorpg for 4 years with 250ms and 30fps the delay was from both the ping and the fps drop? And here I thought playing online games at 30fps is fine -_-
i used to get 6 fps in arma 3 and then i got graphics card
now you get like what 7
no more like 35, it's not the best but its a huge improvement, try running arma 3 yourself, you'll see what i mean
*cough* its CPU intensive || But yes 35 FPS in Arma is GREAT considering its a really hard game to handle and it depends on the server you are playing 35 FPS is totally playable FPS for Arma 3
Good choice
Arma? You're not a real person
To be honest, motion blur makes the game look like it's running slower than it actually is. To add to that, it - you know - *_BLURS THE GAME!_*
If there is an option to turn motion blur off, I keep it OFF! If there's no option, I just don't play the game. I want a wholesome experience, not your skewed perception of 'advanced theatrics.' Same with no option to invert X _and_ Y camera movement.
(Also, I can see and feel a difference between 60 FPS and 144 FPS. 144 is unrealistically smooth, and I love that about it.)
I love the PC Master race guy with *120 on 1:16
it was cool to see but we there are monitors that do 144, 165 and 240hz
"There is no difference between 30 and 60 fps" - said the peasent haha. Heres another one: "PC is way too expensive, I am not going to spend $1000 for minimal performance improvement" - said the peasent. Always makes me laugh.
Really? You do realize 1000 bucks is a huge jump from 300 to 400. Besides let's be honest, your parents bought you that 1000 dollar computer. Not only that but most people with a brain aren't going to waste hundreds more just for better performance when most console games run just fine. When you're an adult with actual responsibilities you'll understand one day :)
ZACH117kitty lmao. A PC at the price for a console (300-400) will outperform the console. If you spend $1000 on a PC, you will notice more than some performance improvements. And PC has better multimedia and in general more games. If you consider a PC waste, a console should be even more of a waste, since you pay more for less uses. Seems like you do not have a brain then. You will understand, what it means to think and to inform yourself before writing and a dumb ass comment, when you are an adult with a job. Oh wait. You dont have a job. That's why you cant afford a PC. :) And I bet with you that there are more adults with a PC than adults with a console. Kids and teenagers make up a big margin of console owners.
do you realize how much paying for a pc costs when you gotta work for it instead of asking your parents?
Doge Coin Miner I do, since I did surely not get it from my parents. My PC cost 600€ (once ofc), then you gotta pay your internet provider which also adds to your bills. But you have to do that with console as well, along with paying 60€ a month for multiplayer. In the long run, a PC is cheaper than console.
Doge Coin Miner $500-$600 will get you a pretty decent PC. Also with a PC you can get a lot of work done which can actually make you money. It's a much better long term investment than a console. You also can pay for it on finance instead of paying the cost upfront. You don't need to get a $1000+ PC.
What was that overwatch gameplay
No, that was Battleborn.
The Mcree and widow gameplay was actually horrible
so, a little correction: 35mm film movies, which are mostly phased out in major theaters(in favor of digital) have 24 frames per second, but they display/flash each frame TWICE, which means that they are actually running at 48fps. at a real 24fps, stuff gets a bit jumpy/odd to the human eye, since 24fps to 30fps is where most people's brains start stringing together the images into a single moving image, so to deal with the variance between people, they display each frame twice.
Digital movies, and digital projectors run from between 48hz, or true 48 frames per second(with 48 actual frames per second) in 2D, all the way up to 240hz interpolated for 3D. look up how the interpolated 3D works too, its kinda cool. It displays your eyes in RLRBRL, which results in a framerate "feel" of 40fps, which results in most people no longer suffering from motion sickness during 3D, but it is actually displaying 240 "real" frames per second, with 1/6th of those being black to allow your brain to work out the depth perception.
With my old computer, I was used to playing games at roughly 20 frames per second... and they are completely playable like that. My new computer can play them up to 60, which I believe is my refresh rate, and it is a lot better... but honestly, I don't see framerate as being too important. I don't play multiplayer games, and I don't get motion sickness.
I can definitely understand the need for higher framerates for multiplayer games though.
Just got a 144Hz 1440p monitor and it's huge improvement over 60Hz. It definitely helps a lot, when you have lot of fast movement, to keep track of the game. Also it's lot more pleasant to look at than 60Hz.
There's some misinformation here. There's no game that has an input lag of 16 ms at 60 fps on consoles. The lowest input lag last gen at 60 fps was 50ms. This generation, because a lot of games use some form of vsync the input lag is around 100 ms. -16 ms of input lag translates to 1 frame of lag. Which means if there's 100 ms of input lag you'll see about 6 frames pass between when you pressed a button and the action shows on screen. - Personally, having played battlefield and counter-strike on PC with a CRT monitor at 120 FPS, I could still tell the difference in smoothness and control responsiveness even between 90 and 120. For most people, though, a rock solid 60 without vsync, buffering, and a proper aiming mechanic (no smoothing, timed acceleration or massive deadzone) should be fine.
In 2020 I can safely say that the majority of so-called "gamers" don't even know what frame rate is. I can also say, from experience, that nowadays people are getting better and better at lying and pretending they have technical knowledge about computers, when in fact they don't even know, or care, what a "byte" even means. Tell them about anti-aliasing and they think you are crazy. Oh yes, some call themselves "engineers" just because they have payed big money to get a diploma.
bull, the human eye can't see more than 30 fps per second! lolololo
Aphromew, TH-cam's Most Uninformed Gaming Critic bait?
It'd say troll rather than bait. I was mocking all the people who will undoubtedly champion that message in the comments.
Because it makes the gameplay more smother giving you the advantage over other players, however 30fps is fine for most games,60fps is better for fast paced games, and 120fps is good for fast pace online fps, Anything over 120fps gives you no advantage, Anything below 25fps is not acceptable in 2017.
Correction: Anything below 60fps is unacceptable.
TestedModz www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/1vy3qe/how_many_frames_per_second_can_the_eye_see/
TestedModz 120fps gives you more actions quicker like turning jumping strafing and going forward
On consoles I'm ok with 30 as long as it's stable but if that game is also on PC then that's where I'll play it for a higher framerate. My PC is pretty decent and I got a 2k monitor so Newer games usually run at 2560x1440 60fps and if not I drop it to 1080p, change the cap to 120hz(doesn't usually stay locked but it's always above 60).
That's a pretty sweet setup.
What's your specs...the monitor included cus I SO want that monitor? (I mean, there's probably a better one but I dunno about it)
+Politically Incorrect I actually got really lucky with the monitor when I bought it I had no idea it was possible to overclock it I mainly wanted the 1440p. Search amazon or newegg for QNIX 2710 and it'll come up I'm not sure exactly which one I got as it was many years ago and what I do remember is it shipped from Korea and I couldn't read the box lol. Had it's own special converter for US power outlets and all and at the time 300$ was a bargain for 27 inch 1440p even without knowing about the overclock.
Rest of my build is a 980, 16 gigs of RAM, i7 2600k. And yeah as far as gaming those it's great for what it is. I could tell the difference in color quality from the Windows logo alone the first time I booted it up. It is more focused on image quality than what you would want for competitive gaming though and that's it's only downside. I've been wanting to get one of those nice legit 144hz 1440p gsync beauties but they all seem to cost 500-700. :(
i5 4460, 750Ti, 8GB of ram, not nearly as good as yours.
And hey, it might not be the BEST for gaming but at least you don't have a 1080p 60hz monitor, TN panel thing, I dunno the response time but it's probably not that good.
Honestly, if response time was my only drawback, I'd be pretty happy although I don't really play games which needs a fast response so that doesn't hurt.
I actually couldn't find the specified model, this being the closest I got. www.amazon.co.uk/d/Monitors/QNIX-QHD2710R-MULTI-Matte-2560x1440-Remote-Control/B01E3FLVWS/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1492419729&sr=8-3-fkmr0&keywords=QNIX+2710
+Politically Incorrect Haha well you'll be happy to hear for the time being that TN is actually better for that type of response time. IPS panels like mine are better for image quality but won't give you as good performance as a TN could, me personally I play more single player games anyway so I'm not too bothered by it and I just unlock it/drop to 1080 for something like Titanfall 2 for the extra frames. That game looks great for the source engine but if you play the multiplayer right you won't have any time to appreciate it anyways lol.
Haha! I suppose so.
As I say, the response time usually isn't important to me (Although I suppose it'll be helpful in something like TF2.)
I am just blown away at how much information our brains can process in the space of a mere second.
bro you ever played on a high refresh rate monitor? i dont think so. dont make false assumptions
Is it better to have unlimited frames, like 120+, or is it ok to just have 60fps?
Space Aids 60 fps is completely fine for most casual gamers. There's nothing wrong with 120fps+, I mean if your computer can do it, go for it. The only advantage is that if you have higher fps your reaction times will be faster. So unless you're really into competitive games like CS:GO where reactions are quite important when playing on a competitive level, you don't really need 120fps+. If you have a standard 60hz monitor, you probably won't notice the difference between 60fps and 100+ fps.
Atømic thanks!
Atømic Correction: If you have a 60hz monitor you will NOT see any difference. Your PC might say your game is at 120fps, but since the monitor can only run at 60 fps, it's impossible to actually see 120fps.
Even on my shitty 60hz monitor I get as high of a framerate as I can on every game that it doesn't cause problems for. It simply feels more responsive and looks better. Some games have things like physics tied to your framerate (looking at you, bethesda games) so going above 60 puts you at risk of things not working right, but aside from those edge cases I say take as many frames as you can get. However If your pc is so powerful that you constantly get far above 300 fps you should probably cap it, or you will put unnecessary strain on your hardware.
Simple answer, for most people, just get as much FPS as you can- it's more responsive and looks better
You are wrong, Kyle. Even on 60hz monitor you can see the difference between 60 fps and 100-150+ fps.
It is minimal indeed, but anyway.
my pc doesent support minecraft
Dab Man the magic of that game is the requirements to render a crap tone of stuff (blocks,mobs ..)and the grafics sort of swept that under the rug
How?
At 2:35 the video mentions input lag caused by lower framerate, while showing a game like Forza Horizon 3 that polls for input at 360 times per second. So it isn't input lag caused by the game engine, but our ability to respond to what we see from the game. The correct wording would be that the action on screen at a lower framerate affects the speed of our input, rather than vice versa.
Especially with a game like that that polls for user input 4 times faster than 60Hz.
Also, most physics systems run at much faster than the framerate. Gran Turismo runs physics at 1000Hz, and that's an extreme example, but many opt to do it at 120Hz or higher.
But you can't see past 0,05328 fps!
You need 250-300 fps to make motion seem actually real. Not 60. Not 90. Not 120. Not 144.
Definitely not 30.
What the fuck
Baby mangler ?
JustusLM someone's joking
i agree XD
can u do a video on wat anti aliasing is?
RJ WILLY its pretty much just adds more pixels so images don't look so jagged
RJ WILLY not to be rude but why would they waste time making a video about it when, 1 you can google it and 2 he literally said what it was.
Jeff T Kk baby whatever you say
a technique used to add greater realism to a digital image by smoothing jagged edges on curved lines and diagonals
RJ WILLY it blurs or smooths out the pixelated edges to make it look better, higher resolutions solve the problem too :p
Why is this 2017 video talking about the importance of high framerates when it doesn't even run at 60fps?
I definatly think that graphics are more important than frams, I would rather play at 4K ultra 60hz, than 1440p medium 120hz
60 I good what about 30
@@mrsupergt1 lel
I absolutely refuse to play below 60fps!! It's high end or bust for me.
If I don't see screen tearing then I don't mind whatever the frame rate is
charlie mora I too, enjoy my games in cinematic 1fps without screen tearing
charlie mora not me bro freesync n gsync all day
charlie mora Even if its same amount of likes your comment has?
what about 1 fps or really anything below 30, probably would be unplayable and make you sick to your stomach possible vomit and get a migraine
Kyle Harding explain to me what game(S) run at 1 frame per second
As long as I get a minimum 30 FPS in non shooter games and a minimum of 60 in shooter games I'm happy