Citadels Comparison - with Zee Garcia

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @Webhead123
    @Webhead123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Thanks, Zee! I think that Citadels is approaching the point of becoming a "modern classic" to me. Such a solid, accessible core design and the added variety of the newest printings just makes it so incredibly replayable. In this age of heavy euros and board game boxes stuffed full of plastic, I think Citadels is easy to overlook but I think doing so is missing out on a fantastic experience.

    • @Revariance
      @Revariance 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Be careful, every time you say "modern classic" you infringe on Mike Dilisio's copyright and face legal action.

    • @Webhead123
      @Webhead123 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Revariance Dilisio doesn't scare me! I've seen his Top 100. ;-)

  • @gassie8952
    @gassie8952 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    This was my gateway game and i still love it. A true classic

  • @jangohemmes352
    @jangohemmes352 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Gigantic boxes for what should've stayed a small game to be taken on the road. Much prefer the original versions, so it's nice to see that at least they came out with a recent version that preserves the artwork. No idea why in that version they went for cardboard coins though

  • @UberTastical22
    @UberTastical22 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    They really could have upped the font size on those bigger cards, eh?

  • @schamalama84
    @schamalama84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I just hear Eric Summerer going “CITADELS!!!!!!!!!!!”

    • @RazBaz07
      @RazBaz07 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I clicked on this video only to like this comment.

  • @DreamReaver
    @DreamReaver 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I have the original with the included expansion. I love the artwork, the box is small and a perfect fit, no air, the coins are great and the crown is wooden, not that gaudy plastic landmine. To date, the best version.

  • @GamesOffTheShelf
    @GamesOffTheShelf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I have the older version but the box looks nothing like these 3 copies. It also had the hard butterscotch coins and I believe a wooden flat crown. The box was a Jaipur or Space Hulk Death Angel shape. Thanks for the comparison Zee!

    • @drillerdev4624
      @drillerdev4624 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I have an old spanish edition with the same box as you, cardboard coins and card crown as the classic edition, but with the second set of characters added (to a total of 18). There's been a myriad of editions already.

    • @nexx410
      @nexx410 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      I have that one too. And they made the box even smaller

  • @chedwick
    @chedwick ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow... That's what is missing out there. There are so many content assuming people is just starting the board game journey :) That kind of comparison makes the decision making process way way easier to me. Thanks a lot!

  • @destinyhero
    @destinyhero ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the comparison!

  • @vancelance8732
    @vancelance8732 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks! I've seen both of these on the shelf at my FLGS and always wondered what the exact differences were.

  • @lukepeterschmidt8111
    @lukepeterschmidt8111 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great content! Thanks.

  • @roseability86
    @roseability86 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ooooh the new printing looks great. I have Classic atm. Like the smaller boxes for travelling.

  • @PatrickBrophy
    @PatrickBrophy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My Citadels is the small blue box from FFG not shown here.

  • @dago6410
    @dago6410 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If they made an addition to the 2016 version, with extra characters and buildings, I woould pay any money for it

  • @christines2787
    @christines2787 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have an even older copy from Fantasy Flight, copyright 2003. It hasn't hit the table in a while but nothing we have ever thought of retiring it

  • @robertbrookes2000
    @robertbrookes2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Played someone else's copy of the original game years and years ago.
    Decided to get the Classic Edition as I have a personal fondness for that art style, plus I knew it'd get played more than the larger version.
    Love it, yeah it has less, but it's a lot cheaper and is very portable.
    I'd say if you're new to the game get the Classic Edition first as there's plenty for it to stand on its own.

  • @nexx410
    @nexx410 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have some other older version that had plastic coins and a wooden crown maker with the DarkCity Expansion inside. Very portable version the box is slightly bigger than a smartphone. And the old artwork is near and dear to my heart. The new one is too similar to everything else out there.

  • @NickGotch
    @NickGotch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a (very) old Fantasy Flight Silver Line version I've really been wanting to update. Seeing the newest version here I do think it may finally be time.

  • @leonerdmccoy
    @leonerdmccoy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    i wish the new one redid the cards with the classic art style

  • @xshadowscreamx
    @xshadowscreamx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Somebody turned up the saturation on the cards when making the updated new small box version.

  • @jeffheinrichs5401
    @jeffheinrichs5401 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’m new to the gaming world would this be a good addition for a new gamer ?

  • @tabletalkreviews
    @tabletalkreviews 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you like the classic edition, you are better off buying the older FFG version secondhand. It has the roles from the Dark Ages expansion, a wooden crown, and plastic coins, similar to the newest printing. Seems like the newest printing is closer to that edition with the new art and a plastic crown.

  • @Tornroot
    @Tornroot 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I bought the large box citadels a few years ago, but I actually made an entirely new, much more compact, box to store everything in. It's tight, but I managed to make it not much bigger than the classic version's size.

  • @IMatchoNation
    @IMatchoNation 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Zee!

  • @russwallace
    @russwallace 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I really like the big box version, don’t like the big box though. I wonder if I removed the insert and everything if all the content would fit in the smaller box.

  • @skilli1987
    @skilli1987 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the German Version "Ohne Furcht und Adel", which has the classic artwork AND the nice plastic coins + a completely different "2D" king figure.

  • @insanegammer109
    @insanegammer109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seems like the new printing just made things smaller as an excuse to cheap out on production...

  • @johanlotigiers
    @johanlotigiers ปีที่แล้ว

    I have de Deluxe-version from 2016. I believe in the new version the action cards (circus cards) are no longer present? correct me if I'm wrong.

  • @Straddllw
    @Straddllw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have the one where the box is the same size as Jaipur box. Why are these boxes so big?

    • @jangohemmes352
      @jangohemmes352 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's ridiculous, much prefer the oldest versions

  • @elementz301
    @elementz301 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My gateway game. Idk why z-man is so intent on destroying the uniqueness of every re-release's art style lol. Also downgrading the components and not including the dark city expansion in the classic edition is lame

  • @BoardGamesBricksHobbies
    @BoardGamesBricksHobbies 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have the older FFG version with the Dark City expansion but never upgraded due to the unnecessarily large box. I like the changes in wording and art (more diversity) so now that there's a smaller version I might consider upgrading!

  • @lemiless
    @lemiless 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    One thing I didn’t know about this game is that Zee doesn’t bite his nails.

  • @pridas5202
    @pridas5202 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s a small card game so I’d only ever own the small box. The new one is ridiculously big for what it is.

    • @praisepanda8313
      @praisepanda8313 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, they could have kept the card sizes of the bix box and it would still fit the new small box. With room to spare

  • @SGFlicksify
    @SGFlicksify 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Newer versions look too chintzy to me - a bit too ‘Disney’. Glad I’ve got the older version.
    (Even if it’s 8 role cards should have been made to look more distinctive from the building cards.)

    • @henrikwakman7776
      @henrikwakman7776 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I could not put my finger on it but you did it for me! Also prefer the black card borders. Overall the design seems more pronounced.

  • @notsaved
    @notsaved 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    they could have kept the tiles tbh. Price would warrant them

    • @alexandru_matei
      @alexandru_matei ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just received my copy of the new edition and I want those tiles so bad. I think they're a lot better than the mini cards.

  • @SansVoix26
    @SansVoix26 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the Citadels (Fantasy Flight Edition) , do I need to upgrade?

  • @dago6410
    @dago6410 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the biug box version is the real deal. the BEST board game ever made

  • @sankap.h.1461
    @sankap.h.1461 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gender neutral language does not matter to most people.

  • @darinherrick9224
    @darinherrick9224 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I took my citadels and crammed it into the box with Mission Red Planet...because it's basically the same game.

    • @maxducoudray
      @maxducoudray 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just like Chess and Checkers are the same, amirite?!

  • @hitomikojiru
    @hitomikojiru 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The gender neutral language is very appreciated.

  • @ScytheNoire
    @ScytheNoire 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like the 2016 bigger box, other than the idiocracy of assuming everyone is a male.

  • @SpoonyBard88
    @SpoonyBard88 ปีที่แล้ว

    The old art is hideous and the newer versions have over twice the content. Seems like a no-brainer for me.

    • @elementz301
      @elementz301 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      whaaat, the old art is so good lol. I find the new art really generic. Probably still a better buy for the extra roles tho