great video as always adrian, I feel the same way about the moonswatch..I was initially really excited about it but when I found out there was all the bullshit about jumping through hoops to get a fun little plastic watch, its put me right off!! On another note I do own a couple of the B&J nato straps and they havent been off the watches since!! theyre absolutely awesome!!
There are more Tudors that I want now than there are Rolex. I love them. I’m wearing a BB58 right now. I’m buying another Tudor next week, and another after that as soon as I can save the cash.
IWC chrono: what about trying the 39mm chrono? Steve MacQueen never wore the Explorer 1655 but he did wear the Hanhart, another Flieger chrono to consider.
I don’t like the BB Pro. It looks like a recent Timex to me. Also, when will Tudor sort out their clasps. They are too big and make their bracelets clumsy. Not helped by the lack of half links too
Hi Adrian, great video! I personally really liked the tudor bb pro and I'll be honest it did not feel that big on the wrist. 😁 I believe it will be a great success and a reall strap beast.
Its nice and I like it more than the usual blackbay but even if i was to overlook the snowflake hand, the thickness and the rivets on the side on the bracelet are a deal braker for me. Not willing to sell my seamaster 300 for it.
Y’all need to just wear what you like and get off hodinkee once in a while, black bays aren’t that thick no matter how many internet people say so. It ain’t that serious
I 100% agree with you… if we’re talking about a sub $1k watch. Speaking for myself and probably one or two other people out there, I’d better be in love with the watch if I’m going to spend >$1k-1.5k. That being said. Not all thick watches wear thick, so trying it on is probably the way to go
The greatest obstacle to obtaining a good timepiece should be the cost to buy. If there’s more to it than that… forget it. There’s too many good options out there to get stuck on one brand.
What’s your next purchase going to be then? Mines hopefully a BB Pro, which is why I watched a video about it. Is this the same philosophy you apply to games consoles?
@@alfieakaronaldog I’m not sure what my next watch purchase is going to be, which is why I watched this video. I also figure that eventually there will be PS5’s in the store, so I am playing the waiting game on consoles. There’s part of me that would like to be able to say “I own a Rolex” but I’m not going to buy one until I can walk into the dealer, try on options, and choose. (Which may be never)
@@Bemjji I’m assuming the cash/cost price is not an obstacle to you then if you were viewing as a prospective purchase? As you knew that the BB Pro is going to be wait listed, forgive me if I call BS on that being true though. Seems to me you just wanted to have an angry rant (and have now added in Rolex for good measure) about expensive watches. I hope you find something you like that’s just sitting around in a shop window. Be sure to get at least 15-20% off what they are asking for it though.
@@alfieakaronaldog that’s a lot of assumptions 😂. There are plenty of watch enthusiasts that can afford a Rolex and are bothered by the state of the market and playing games with the ADs.
@@joshuadamaceno617 Yes it is a lot of assumptions, but think I mainly assume correctly. Being able to afford a Rolex and actually wanting to buy one are two very different things. Most people moaning in TH-cam comments are not enthusiast’s who would be buying one to own and wear (sorry, another assumption).
Tudor fanboy and also a Rolex one! The more I saw it and eventually got my hands on it, the less I liked it. Tudor , the only brand to be forgiven for making a Clomage! But adding a handset that lets be fair should be only on dive watches is an easy way to distract your thoughts Adrian! Watch is way too thick on my wrist , can be forgiven as a Chronograph but not a GMT.
What’s thicker? A Tudor? The clowns buying plastic Omegas for 5 times the price? Waiting years for a Rolex or paying a premium for an item you could get robbed for?
I am a minority here for sure, but I love Tudor watches particularly for their thickness. It transmits a sense of a true tool watch, which is what I am interested in, regardless of what I am wearing or the occasion. But I believe that your comments at the end of the video are the most important and I wish all agreed with you: we have had enough of waiting list, flippers and paying premium just to be able to own something which is not a limited edition piece. So I am done with Rolex, for instance, and anything else (clubs, restaurants, etc.) where I need to wait and be robbed.
I'm with you too on the thickness. I love my 41mm BB diver for how solid it feels and wears. The best part of the thickness complaint is that you can get sweet deals on the used market.
Agree 100% and the whole pretentious waiting lists for Rolex, clubs, cars etc - all done to fuel the already wealthy and make people feel they are special. Hoping Tudor does not go same route.
Just tried this on in the store , it’s stunning. Thickness non issue. It’s a timeless piece that would look incredible in an array of straps. Definitely adding to my collection when I can get one
Managed to collect mine yesterday on the rubber strap, the proportions are spot on, the thickness seems to just blend into the overall proportions of the watch. In other words you really don't notice the thickness. It really is a watch which needs to be seen, you simply don't notice it being 'thick' at all. Overall very impressed, great watch.
@@oOoScarecrow31oOo not changed the strap, quite like the rubber/leather OEM at the moment, but based on other watches of similar thickness it will be fine on a Nato
In case anyone is considering this watch in 2023, after six months, mine had to be sent back due to defective movement, the crown was stuck and wouldn’t wind or move the time or date.
I've a tiny 6" wrist. Tried it on at my AD shop last week and it fits me well. The thickness just melts away and I love how it looks on my wrist. Placed my name down for either a bracelet or rubber strap. Note : I preferred small watches for obvious reason. All my collections are no bigger than 40mm. SO it says something about this Tudor GMT. Have an opened mind and go try it on. One might be pleasantly surprised ü
@@WatchUnwind I am! put my name onto the wish list so if one becomes available I will be buying the bracelet version and then sourcing the rubber strap separately from tudor!
I love Tudor but the case thickness always puts me off ! I owned the reverse panda owned it for a month not only the case but the faux rivets put me off and sold if it was thinner it would be a winner 🤷♂️
I hate the faux riveted bracelet and I know alot others don't like it either. It would be nice if they dropped the riveted bracelet altogether but Tudor seems to love it unfortunately but yeah way to gimmicke or just make a real riveted bracelet. They should have left it like the first black bay that didn't have the faux rivets
Too thick and too heavy. For just over £3000 . Nope not for me. So what if it due to the crystal, overall thickness is overall thickness. And how come this guy never mentions the weight in grams of the watches . That is a key point that most watch reviewers now mention as it is a key indicator of comfort on wrist. That and yes, thickness….Simples.
I have this. It’s slightly top heavy but it’s still so comfortable and Reminds me of the older sea dwellers with its thickness. It’s an awesome watch and I’m enjoying wearing it.
Having been lucky enough to pick one up the day they were released I agree with what you are saying. I have owned the 41mm black bay before and this wears completely different. Although it’s by no means thin, It doesn’t have the bulk and isn’t too top heavy, partly down to that new clasp allowing you to get the perfect fit! I think lots of people are writing it off based on the numbers, I would recommend trying in person, I think many will be pleasantly surprised 👌🏻😎
Congrats !!! I just made a big purchase for me at least earlier in the year so it might be while before I get another watch buy this is definitely on my radar
I just tried it on at an AD and I was wearing my 126610LN when I went in to try it out. I felt the BB Pro was just to small in diameter, and way to thick compared to its diameter. My god if this watch was 41mm and thinner insta-buy.
Not too thick at all. I have 6.75 inch wrists. Wears smaller than my Seamaster 300m which is slimmer. Love this thing! Perfect go anywhere do any thing adventure watch.
Phoned my AD about this watch say three weeks ago to inquire about picking it up. At the time, she said they hadn't seen any come into the shop yet and definitely not on bracelet (which is what I was requesting). So, yeah, you know it...the list. But this tale has a happy ending and that's why I'm sharing. She called yesterday to let me know the bracelet version is in and it's mine if I want it. It'll be on my wrist Thursday. The point? The wait was minimal and this should not end up causing the same frustration as its sister brand and its nebulous lists.
If you like this look then I think the GS SBGE283 / 285 is a much better option. Better case dimensions, better finishing, great materials and movement - and available so you don't have to deal with all the Rolex / Tudor BS
I decided to check it out. It’s the new release, right. The movement is probably great but I’m not sure about the dimensions and the bracelet. I’m personally not fan of polished elements on a bracelet...
I'm sorry, the Rolex 1655 Bezel with circular markers is just a travesty. It just is. It's cringeworthy. The Rolex 1655 was a thing of beauty, and this ruins it. Get the Steinhardt Ocean Vintage, it's a worthy successor to the 1655.
Just got one on bracelet - wears smaller than a 41 but larger than a 58. The clasp aids in a comfortable fit. I agree…give it a try and you may be surprised. Good review Adrian - balanced and fair.
Are you all youtubers being paid by Rolex/Tudor? Why nobody says what is clear to everyone else, Tudor is becoming an homage watchmaker.... Or the Rolex you can actually buy
It’s all subjective. For me the 41GMT I owned was too thick so for me the pro will also be too thick. Also, that thickness on a smaller watch head is a bit odd. Like all watches. They are not for everyone.
Checked out the watch today at our local AD. Somehow it looked cheap. Meanwhile the pictures taken by Adrian are so much nicer than the actual product.
I wonder if Tudor re working on the Polar Black Bay Pro? There will have to be clear black borders for the lume hour plots. nd black borders to the lumed hands. But it is possible.
I don't think smaller watches necessarily need to be thinner than larger ones (as people are alleging by harking on about "proportion"). I think the visual impact of thickness is actually *reduced* by making the watch smaller in diameter. There is less watch and that makes up for the fact that it's a bit thick. That's borne out by all the video I've seen of the BB Pro - it looks great to me. Pleasantly chunky but not oversized in general.
I absolutely love this watch. The size is perfect. Because it's only 39, the height gives it perfect volume. I own many watches but I only wear the pro now I love it so much. Anyone who says this is too thick doesn't know what they are talking about
So glad you said " Go try it on ! " So often we make pre-conceived judgements that are just not accurate. However, I would have much preferred to have seen it in a 41mm case. Sadly my son's BB 58 blue is lost on my 8inch wrist, so for me the diameter is the issue . Love the 1655 influence , one of the best Rolex's ever designed . That with the yellow Gmt hand , make it the slightly chubby love child of the 1655 and the Ranger! I do really like it though. Adrian, so agree with you on the waiting list political bull! It's why I will never by a Rolex.
Congratulations you're in the top 10 ish percent of gargantuan wrists. You can wear any watch in production with ease. With great power comes great responsibility.
I tried the BB Pro on the rubber (wish they had it on the steal) and it honestly looked massive on my 16.7 wrist. From a person who actually tried it on, its not for me.
@@davidb9531 congrats! did you pull the trigger? the problem is that my arms are flat on the top and thin from side to side. meaning that thicker watches look abnormal on MY arm. glad it fit yours fine 🙃
I totally agree with everything you said... Not only about the watch which I really like but also about the terrible waiting lists and queues...I currently wear a gmt 16710 which is on my wrist for almost 20 years. I want this bb pro as a daily watch I believe it ticks all the boxes.. Sport, elegant, tool, travel...
Tried it on a NATO. It's a great piece. I think you nailed it-even with the extra layer, the thickness wouldn't have been a deal breaker. Feels thinner on wrist than their chrono or even the Pepsi gmt
No. No. No. Those rivets has no functuay for that watch at all. It is a deal-breaker for me. I believe they done that on purpose so not to give competition to Rolex.
Got one last weekend. Was amazed how fast i could get one after i finally found a dealer where i could place an order. Got one on a bracelet. I love love love it. I also have a BB58. I am amazed how i lived with without the bracelet adjustment which i use now all the time. I have small wrists. Around 17cm. It fits fabulous. And thickness is a non issue. It is there but not in a bad way. It is also more comfortable than my bb58. But i think this is more due to my sharper edged bb58 than anything else.
I love to know why they keep this unessarsary decoration myself. It's way too gimmicke. Hey if Tudor loves the rivets so much just make a real riveted bracelet
idk why everyone is so worried abt a thick watch. and i get it- no, it wont slip under a cuff…but how many ppl are rlly wearing dress shirts daily anymore? i personally like a thick watch, my daily is 17mm, sedna smp300m chronograph, tho if it was steel (or even white gold)instead of sedna, idk if id like it to be quite that thick. and my speedy moonphase is 16mm…but my top 4 rotation is rounded out with a darkside of the moon at 11mm and a yachtmaster 42 at 11.5mm so i guess i need the BB Pro to sit right in the middle 😂
Nice video. Never understood the appeal of the Explorer II, but know that it is a highly-regarded watch. This Tudor BBP is a fantastic interpretation (or homage) of its Rolex cousin. I like what the folks at Tudor have done.
Something very noticeable about my Rolex GMT is how thin it is.... feels like one of the thinnest automatics I've worn. For Tudor money, I expect better. Seriously... this Tudor is more ugly than the Steinhardt "Explorer II" knockoff. And I wouldn't be surprised if the quality isn't better either. Go Steinhardt.
I agree 👍 💯 it's to much money 💰 for a homage. If I'm spending that kinda 💸 I want something original with it's own identity unlike the Tudor pro but yeah get a Steinhart homage . I don't see what people love about the Tudor pro and those horrible faux rivet s. I have a Explorer 1 and it wears so good
why dont they listen to the customers?! its a great looking watch over all but the ONE THING ive never seen someone say they like is the fake rivets. constant complaints and ppl not liking it so why dont they either make them real rivets or get rid of them?!
I watched your review awhile back, went to my local AD on the 21st of May, to register interest. I got it today full retail very happy Just over 3 weeks waiting. Thanks for your reviews I enjoy your content
If ONLY it was a 40-42mm case ... and the same thickness would be fine... given my 8" wrist. The Pepsi GMT fits my wrist just fine but I do love the looks of this new BB Pro.
I find modern black bays proportionally too thick. I own an old ETA and it's a fantastic watch. I've experienced the new in house and the GMT and they're just a slab.
* WIpes the coffee spill from the monitos screen * How thick again? :O Thickness should serve a purpose, to hide whatever components inside the watch. Either there are lots of things happening inside the watch, or there is lots of air in it.
Tried this on the leather/rubber strap and it wears really nice on my 7.10 inch wrist. It certainly has a certain presence height wise, however, it isn't noticeable and the 39mm case negates this well. A really handsome, retro but modern watch. If it has been on the bracelet, it would now be on my wrist.
Tried this on... As an owner of 2 BB58's (Black and Bronze)... I thought the thickness would bother me... it doesn't. I have a request in with my AD, they only had it on the fabric strap, so I am waiting on a bracelet version. Pumped.
It's a great looking watch that's for sure. I haven't seen one in the flesh but if it is like the other Black Bay models then, for me, the actual thickness isn't a problem - it's the way they wear it. I love the Tudor GMT but I tried one on and it's just so slab sided that I found it clumsy looking. Same for the original Black Bay. If the case was sculpted somehow (like a Yachtmaster for example) I think it would hide the dimensions more elegantly.
Not only is it too thick, but it's also ugly. I know I'm in the minority, but I guess field watches just isn't my thing. Also not a fan of the crazy vintage Rolex explorer 2 homagey vibes.
The real spirit of Rolex is on TUDOR now, super happy for that. If people bother's me because TUDOR is the Rolex for poor man , I would say ,Rolex is the Patek P........ for poor man, just in case, I own a Rolex Air King, absolutely love it. I will go for that TUDOR right away.Nice video.
Never once while wearing a watch did its thickness ever cross my mind. I find it interesting it’s such a talking point right now. Like I know some of my watches are thicker than my others but it was never something I factored into my decision making
Have you ever tried on a James Cameron Deepsea? I have a Submariner, an old Explorer II, a Tudor GMT and a Speedmaster. I tried on the JC Deepsea and its thickness is ridiculous. Looked a nice watch but absolutely horrid on and for that reason would never buy.
@@chops6890 I have and to tell you the truth that didn’t bother me either. I am a bigger guy who lifts a lot of weights so for my size and shape I think I notice case size a lot more than I notice thickness.
Thickness is just one parameter. It is the overall case proportion that is important. Thick case with small diameter make the watch look stubby. Whereas same case thickness but larger diameter make the watch looks perfect. So consider all parameters holistically. As mentioned, always try the watch in the flesh before passing any final judgement.
It's a fine looking watch at a good size so it ought to be a big seller for them. I reckon the sizing is spot on as well. The domed crystal increases the thickness somewhat but the end result is worth it. Still won't be buying one though.
Amazing watch, great review :) . Thick or not to thick…for me this is not the right question! Tudor somehow has the ability to hit the jackpot (BB58 925….and now the pro)!
Hi Adrian, thanks for the video...do you reckon that the new Longines Zulu Time GMT could be a competitor for this watch, i feel they have similar specs and I don't know which one I'd chose over the other
I actually prefer the "bad lighting" for content, because they're much accurate on how the watch looks like in real life.. Over polished pictures is a bit too cheugy now in 2022
Definitely a thick boi.
(That apartment looks amazing 👀)
I wish it was mine.
Mines thicker
@@ManWithNoShame Would have costed you $0 to keep this thought to yourself
@@mxgic-demonz3476 get your mind out the gutter mate.
@@ManWithNoShame You must be talking about your brain
Kevin O’Leary one time said “ why I have to buy a Tudor when I can buy a Rolex?”
This watch is the answer.
Rolex doesn’t make vintage look watches.
Agree with your review! Just picked one up today!!
great video as always adrian, I feel the same way about the moonswatch..I was initially really excited about it but when I found out there was all the bullshit about jumping through hoops to get a fun little plastic watch, its put me right off!! On another note I do own a couple of the B&J nato straps and they havent been off the watches since!! theyre absolutely awesome!!
There are more Tudors that I want now than there are Rolex. I love them. I’m wearing a BB58 right now. I’m buying another Tudor next week, and another after that as soon as I can save the cash.
IWC chrono: what about trying the 39mm chrono? Steve MacQueen never wore the Explorer 1655 but he did wear the Hanhart, another Flieger chrono to consider.
I don’t like the BB Pro. It looks like a recent Timex to me. Also, when will Tudor sort out their clasps. They are too big and make their bracelets clumsy. Not helped by the lack of half links too
Hi Adrian, great video! I personally really liked the tudor bb pro and I'll be honest it did not feel that big on the wrist. 😁 I believe it will be a great success and a reall strap beast.
Its nice and I like it more than the usual blackbay but even if i was to overlook the snowflake hand, the thickness and the rivets on the side on the bracelet are a deal braker for me. Not willing to sell my seamaster 300 for it.
It is all about proportion. 226570 is 42mm wide 12.5mm thick, while the BB Pro is 39mm wide 14.6mm thick, and that makes the difference!
Why does the date sometimes roll back and sometimes snap back? Anyone else notice that around 2:50-3:00?
I think the size (and obviously design) are great... more confused with the name!
I think the watch size is just fine.
Is it possible to get to sand down the faux rivets and smooth out the bracelet?
Tudors are some of the best value watches on the market
The Marine Nationale was my favourite Tudor. Now, this is.
I definitely go for the Tudor Pelagos Fxd at least it has its own identity and it's not trying to look like something else like the Tudor pro
Y’all need to just wear what you like and get off hodinkee once in a while, black bays aren’t that thick no matter how many internet people say so. It ain’t that serious
I 100% agree with you… if we’re talking about a sub $1k watch. Speaking for myself and probably one or two other people out there, I’d better be in love with the watch if I’m going to spend >$1k-1.5k. That being said. Not all thick watches wear thick, so trying it on is probably the way to go
Agree 100%
Disagree. Too thick. Like wearing a hockey puck on the wrist.
@@brettrun8575I’ve had mine for a year, It doesn’t wear thick. It’s a lot less top heavier than my IWCs by flipping miles
For someone who has tiny, TINY wrists who bought one yesterday, it surprisingly doesn't wear thick at all
The greatest obstacle to obtaining a good timepiece should be the cost to buy. If there’s more to it than that… forget it. There’s too many good options out there to get stuck on one brand.
What’s your next purchase going to be then?
Mines hopefully a BB Pro, which is why I watched a video about it.
Is this the same philosophy you apply to games consoles?
@@alfieakaronaldog I’m not sure what my next watch purchase is going to be, which is why I watched this video. I also figure that eventually there will be PS5’s in the store, so I am playing the waiting game on consoles. There’s part of me that would like to be able to say “I own a Rolex” but I’m not going to buy one until I can walk into the dealer, try on options, and choose. (Which may be never)
@@Bemjji I’m assuming the cash/cost price is not an obstacle to you then if you were viewing as a prospective purchase?
As you knew that the BB Pro is going to be wait listed, forgive me if I call BS on that being true though.
Seems to me you just wanted to have an angry rant (and have now added in Rolex for good measure) about expensive watches.
I hope you find something you like that’s just sitting around in a shop window.
Be sure to get at least 15-20% off what they are asking for it though.
@@alfieakaronaldog that’s a lot of assumptions 😂. There are plenty of watch enthusiasts that can afford a Rolex and are bothered by the state of the market and playing games with the ADs.
@@joshuadamaceno617 Yes it is a lot of assumptions, but think I mainly assume correctly.
Being able to afford a Rolex and actually wanting to buy one are two very different things.
Most people moaning in TH-cam comments are not enthusiast’s who would be buying one to own and wear (sorry, another assumption).
Tudor fanboy and also a Rolex one! The more I saw it and eventually got my hands on it, the less I liked it. Tudor , the only brand to be forgiven for making a Clomage! But adding a handset that lets be fair should be only on dive watches is an easy way to distract your thoughts Adrian! Watch is way too thick on my wrist , can be forgiven as a Chronograph but not a GMT.
What’s thicker?
A Tudor?
The clowns buying plastic Omegas for 5 times the price?
Waiting years for a Rolex or paying a premium for an item you could get robbed for?
🤣
It's too thick if you have little girly-man wrists. Works for most of us.
I am a minority here for sure, but I love Tudor watches particularly for their thickness. It transmits a sense of a true tool watch, which is what I am interested in, regardless of what I am wearing or the occasion. But I believe that your comments at the end of the video are the most important and I wish all agreed with you: we have had enough of waiting list, flippers and paying premium just to be able to own something which is not a limited edition piece. So I am done with Rolex, for instance, and anything else (clubs, restaurants, etc.) where I need to wait and be robbed.
I'm with you too on the thickness. I love my 41mm BB diver for how solid it feels and wears. The best part of the thickness complaint is that you can get sweet deals on the used market.
Agree 100% and the whole pretentious waiting lists for Rolex, clubs, cars etc - all done to fuel the already wealthy and make people feel they are special. Hoping Tudor does not go same route.
I hope Tudor start increasing the thickness more 🤞
I agree that an ideal thickness, like most other things about watches, is subjective. But is thick = tool watch?
Just tried this on in the store , it’s stunning. Thickness non issue. It’s a timeless piece that would look incredible in an array of straps. Definitely adding to my collection when I can get one
100%
I agree. I just bought one recently and I love it.
Managed to collect mine yesterday on the rubber strap, the proportions are spot on, the thickness seems to just blend into the overall proportions of the watch. In other words you really don't notice the thickness. It really is a watch which needs to be seen, you simply don't notice it being 'thick' at all. Overall very impressed, great watch.
How does it wear on a NATO strap with that thickness ?! 🤔
@@oOoScarecrow31oOo not changed the strap, quite like the rubber/leather OEM at the moment, but based on other watches of similar thickness it will be fine on a Nato
In case anyone is considering this watch in 2023, after six months, mine had to be sent back due to defective movement, the crown was stuck and wouldn’t wind or move the time or date.
The watch is great! Tried it on yesterday on the bracelet and the rubber and I loved both, the rubber is very impressive! Great video Adrian cheers
Thanks for watching Kelvin.
Is the rubber strap the same of BB ceramic?
Are you going to end up buying it?
I've a tiny 6" wrist. Tried it on at my AD shop last week and it fits me well. The thickness just melts away and I love how it looks on my wrist. Placed my name down for either a bracelet or rubber strap.
Note : I preferred small watches for obvious reason. All my collections are no bigger than 40mm. SO it says something about this Tudor GMT. Have an opened mind and go try it on. One might be pleasantly surprised ü
@@WatchUnwind I am! put my name onto the wish list so if one becomes available I will be buying the bracelet version and then sourcing the rubber strap separately from tudor!
I love Tudor but the case thickness always puts me off ! I owned the reverse panda owned it for a month not only the case but the faux rivets put me off and sold if it was thinner it would be a winner 🤷♂️
I hate the faux riveted bracelet and I know alot others don't like it either. It would be nice if they dropped the riveted bracelet altogether but Tudor seems to love it unfortunately but yeah way to gimmicke or just make a real riveted bracelet. They should have left it like the first black bay that didn't have the faux rivets
Too thick and too heavy. For just over £3000 . Nope not for me. So what if it due to the crystal, overall thickness is overall thickness. And how come this guy never mentions the weight in grams of the watches . That is a key point that most watch reviewers now mention as it is a key indicator of comfort on wrist. That and yes, thickness….Simples.
I have this. It’s slightly top heavy but it’s still so comfortable and Reminds me of the older sea dwellers with its thickness. It’s an awesome watch and I’m enjoying wearing it.
Having been lucky enough to pick one up the day they were released I agree with what you are saying. I have owned the 41mm black bay before and this wears completely different. Although it’s by no means thin, It doesn’t have the bulk and isn’t too top heavy, partly down to that new clasp allowing you to get the perfect fit!
I think lots of people are writing it off based on the numbers, I would recommend trying in person, I think many will be pleasantly surprised 👌🏻😎
Congrats !!! I just made a big purchase for me at least earlier in the year so it might be while before I get another watch buy this is definitely on my radar
Hi Josh, I think you've summed it up brilliantly. I'm just waiting to try it at my AD.
I have one and what your saying is spot on
I just tried it on at an AD and I was wearing my 126610LN when I went in to try it out. I felt the BB Pro was just to small in diameter, and way to thick compared to its diameter. My god if this watch was 41mm and thinner insta-buy.
Whats its lug to lug?
Too bad it’s probably not gonna be easy to buy.
Both my local AD and Ace Jeweler have said it’s gonna be long wait.
Not too thick at all. I have 6.75 inch wrists. Wears smaller than my Seamaster 300m which is slimmer. Love this thing! Perfect go anywhere do any thing adventure watch.
Phoned my AD about this watch say three weeks ago to inquire about picking it up. At the time, she said they hadn't seen any come into the shop yet and definitely not on bracelet (which is what I was requesting). So, yeah, you know it...the list. But this tale has a happy ending and that's why I'm sharing. She called yesterday to let me know the bracelet version is in and it's mine if I want it. It'll be on my wrist Thursday. The point? The wait was minimal and this should not end up causing the same frustration as its sister brand and its nebulous lists.
Tudor Black Bay Pro is just stunning and Tudor did a brilliant job - period. To me, it’s the best Tudor released ever
If you like this look then I think the GS SBGE283 / 285 is a much better option. Better case dimensions, better finishing, great materials and movement - and available so you don't have to deal with all the Rolex / Tudor BS
True but almost twice the price
I decided to check it out. It’s the new release, right. The movement is probably great but I’m not sure about the dimensions and the bracelet. I’m personally not fan of polished elements on a bracelet...
I'm sorry, the Rolex 1655 Bezel with circular markers is just a travesty. It just is. It's cringeworthy. The Rolex 1655 was a thing of beauty, and this ruins it. Get the Steinhardt Ocean Vintage, it's a worthy successor to the 1655.
I tried those on yesterday. They certainly wear very well! I urge enthusiasts to Go try one, dont let the thickness deter you.
If I try one one I’m going to buy it and then my wife’s going to get upset so I’m going to point her to this comment and blame it on you
Just got one on bracelet - wears smaller than a 41 but larger than a 58. The clasp aids in a comfortable fit. I agree…give it a try and you may be surprised. Good review Adrian - balanced and fair.
@@roylobue7125 is this bracelet and clasp the same that’s on the bb gmt Pepsi? Thanks
@@2K9s it’s different - more narrow bracelet and adjustable clasp. It’s thinner to match the more narrow lugs. Adjustable clasp is top notch
@@roylobue7125
Hey, thanks for getting back to me… I appreciate your insight.
Are you all youtubers being paid by Rolex/Tudor? Why nobody says what is clear to everyone else, Tudor is becoming an homage watchmaker.... Or the Rolex you can actually buy
You called the 41mm diameter, in house, Black Bay thick. At 39mm this is proportionally thicker. Not sure this is coherent.
It’s all subjective. For me the 41GMT I owned was too thick so for me the pro will also be too thick. Also, that thickness on a smaller watch head is a bit odd. Like all watches. They are not for everyone.
Let’s bring back flat crystals and crown guards
Checked out the watch today at our local AD. Somehow it looked cheap.
Meanwhile the pictures taken by Adrian are so much nicer than the actual product.
I wonder if Tudor re working on the Polar Black Bay Pro? There will have to be clear black borders for the lume hour plots. nd black borders to the lumed hands. But it is possible.
A lot of ppl are saying it’s out of proportion because of the thickness. I’ve tried this watch on and it wears great 👍
I don't think smaller watches necessarily need to be thinner than larger ones (as people are alleging by harking on about "proportion"). I think the visual impact of thickness is actually *reduced* by making the watch smaller in diameter. There is less watch and that makes up for the fact that it's a bit thick. That's borne out by all the video I've seen of the BB Pro - it looks great to me. Pleasantly chunky but not oversized in general.
I absolutely love this watch. The size is perfect. Because it's only 39, the height gives it perfect volume. I own many watches but I only wear the pro now I love it so much. Anyone who says this is too thick doesn't know what they are talking about
So glad you said " Go try it on ! " So often we make pre-conceived judgements that are just not accurate. However, I would have much preferred to have seen it in a 41mm case. Sadly my son's BB 58 blue is lost on my 8inch wrist, so for me the diameter is the issue . Love the 1655 influence , one of the best Rolex's ever designed . That with the yellow Gmt hand , make it the slightly chubby love child of the 1655 and the Ranger! I do really like it though. Adrian, so agree with you on the waiting list political bull! It's why I will never by a Rolex.
Congratulations you're in the top 10 ish percent of gargantuan wrists. You can wear any watch in production with ease. With great power comes great responsibility.
@@fVNzO 😂 it’s true because big wrists can wear big and small watches but small wrists can’t always wear big watches
Love mine greatly. It’s my favorite GMT still… wearing it right now.
I do bust out laughing when I hear someone say, "But it's 0.1mm thinner".
Faux riveted bracelet looks cheap and detracts from the watch
I tried the BB Pro on the rubber (wish they had it on the steal) and it honestly looked massive on my 16.7 wrist. From a person who actually tried it on, its not for me.
I have a 16.5 inch wrist and it fits perfectly, go figure
@@davidb9531 congrats! did you pull the trigger? the problem is that my arms are flat on the top and thin from side to side. meaning that thicker watches look abnormal on MY arm. glad it fit yours fine 🙃
@@dehydratedvital any Tudor in an AD on spec like this it seemed rude not to
I totally agree with everything you said... Not only about the watch which I really like but also about the terrible waiting lists and queues...I currently wear a gmt 16710 which is on my wrist for almost 20 years. I want this bb pro as a daily watch I believe it ticks all the boxes.. Sport, elegant, tool, travel...
This watch is utterly gorgeous. I'm afraid I'm just going to have to pull the trigger- well, when it's actually available that is!!
Yes it is too thick. Period.
Hi, which mic do you use? I enjoy your sound quality.
Quote ‚ I have zero interest in pissing about with games and waitlists. ‘. Spoken from the heart. 👍🏼💪
Tried it on a NATO. It's a great piece. I think you nailed it-even with the extra layer, the thickness wouldn't have been a deal breaker. Feels thinner on wrist than their chrono or even the Pepsi gmt
Love it! Sadly would never be able to buy one. Just don't have the patience to play the AD game.
No. No. No. Those rivets has no functuay for that watch at all. It is a deal-breaker for me. I believe they done that on purpose so not to give competition to Rolex.
I agree. I think Tudor purposely does a couple of design things that allow Rolex to shine.
Other than the BB58, I find all their watches too thick
Got one last weekend. Was amazed how fast i could get one after i finally found a dealer where i could place an order. Got one on a bracelet. I love love love it. I also have a BB58. I am amazed how i lived with without the bracelet adjustment which i use now all the time. I have small wrists. Around 17cm. It fits fabulous. And thickness is a non issue. It is there but not in a bad way. It is also more comfortable than my bb58. But i think this is more due to my sharper edged bb58 than anything else.
Everyone seems to detest the faux rivets, myself included. So why do Tudor persevere with them? Tudor, are you listening?
I love to know why they keep this unessarsary decoration myself. It's way too gimmicke. Hey if Tudor loves the rivets so much just make a real riveted bracelet
agree with your stance on availability of watches. been waiting forever for a tudor bb chrono. be safe A ~ JDS/CT
Love it! I read some of the comments. Thickness is non issue. 100% true. It’s wears wonderfully.
idk why everyone is so worried abt a thick watch. and i get it- no, it wont slip under a cuff…but how many ppl are rlly wearing dress shirts daily anymore? i personally like a thick watch, my daily is 17mm, sedna smp300m chronograph, tho if it was steel (or even white gold)instead of sedna, idk if id like it to be quite that thick. and my speedy moonphase is 16mm…but my top 4 rotation is rounded out with a darkside of the moon at 11mm and a yachtmaster 42 at 11.5mm so i guess i need the BB Pro to sit right in the middle 😂
Nice video. Never understood the appeal of the Explorer II, but know that it is a highly-regarded watch. This Tudor BBP is a fantastic interpretation (or homage) of its Rolex cousin. I like what the folks at Tudor have done.
Something very noticeable about my Rolex GMT is how thin it is.... feels like one of the thinnest automatics I've worn. For Tudor money, I expect better. Seriously... this Tudor is more ugly than the Steinhardt "Explorer II" knockoff. And I wouldn't be surprised if the quality isn't better either. Go Steinhardt.
I agree 👍 💯 it's to much money 💰 for a homage. If I'm spending that kinda 💸 I want something original with it's own identity unlike the Tudor pro but yeah get a Steinhart homage . I don't see what people love about the Tudor pro and those horrible faux rivet s. I have a Explorer 1 and it wears so good
why dont they listen to the customers?! its a great looking watch over all but the ONE THING ive never seen someone say they like is the fake rivets. constant complaints and ppl not liking it so why dont they either make them real rivets or get rid of them?!
I watched your review awhile back, went to my local AD on the 21st of May, to register interest. I got it today full retail very happy Just over 3 weeks waiting. Thanks for your reviews I enjoy your content
If ONLY it was a 40-42mm case ... and the same thickness would be fine... given my 8" wrist. The Pepsi GMT fits my wrist just fine but I do love the looks of this new BB Pro.
I find modern black bays proportionally too thick. I own an old ETA and it's a fantastic watch. I've experienced the new in house and the GMT and they're just a slab.
Buy the Steinhart version for $500 and save money to buy gold/silver
Agreed 👍 who wants a homage at this price now $500 is a different story 😁
Would be nice if AD’s get the watch.
Great video, tried one on at the AD. Wish it was 42mm but just about big enough, did not feel too heavy (I have 8 inch wrist) love the clasp as well.
Loving the new Steve McQueen gmt 😍🥰🤩
* WIpes the coffee spill from the monitos screen *
How thick again? :O
Thickness should serve a purpose, to hide whatever components inside the watch. Either there are lots of things happening inside the watch, or there is lots of air in it.
Tried on at my AD… IMO… not thick. Don’t let the “14.6mm’ fool you. it’s a gorgeous watch. Well executed!
Tried this on the leather/rubber strap and it wears really nice on my 7.10 inch wrist. It certainly has a certain presence height wise, however, it isn't noticeable and the 39mm case negates this well. A really handsome, retro but modern watch. If it has been on the bracelet, it would now be on my wrist.
I have the Tudor Pelgos, but this black bay pro I dont like.
Because The Pelagos either version has its own identity unlike the Tudor pro which is basically a homage
Tried this on... As an owner of 2 BB58's (Black and Bronze)... I thought the thickness would bother me... it doesn't. I have a request in with my AD, they only had it on the fabric strap, so I am waiting on a bracelet version. Pumped.
Like wearing a heavy hockey puck on the wrist. Shame. Otherwise very nice.
It's a great looking watch that's for sure. I haven't seen one in the flesh but if it is like the other Black Bay models then, for me, the actual thickness isn't a problem - it's the way they wear it. I love the Tudor GMT but I tried one on and it's just so slab sided that I found it clumsy looking. Same for the original Black Bay. If the case was sculpted somehow (like a Yachtmaster for example) I think it would hide the dimensions more elegantly.
I've never used the camera before. However I would love to come to watches and wonders. That's my CV😊
haha
Tudor looks better than Rolex 😊
Nice looking Nato straps, anyone know where you can pick them up?
Not only is it too thick, but it's also ugly. I know I'm in the minority, but I guess field watches just isn't my thing. Also not a fan of the crazy vintage Rolex explorer 2 homagey vibes.
Got mine today, great watch!
Rolex waiting lists: "Can't be bothered" - YES!!! exactly my view. Forget waiting lists and buy what is available.
Same here. Don't get the point.. when we like the releases, we can afford a new (not vintage/rare) watch and then: no sir. Pls wait 6-10 months..
You’d be thick to buy Turdor.
The real spirit of Rolex is on TUDOR now, super happy for that. If people bother's me because TUDOR is the Rolex for poor man , I would say ,Rolex is the Patek P........ for poor man, just in case, I own a Rolex Air King, absolutely love it. I will go for that TUDOR right away.Nice video.
yet another 39mm watch I can't pull off on my 8in wrist. boo
All Tudors are too thick.
Never once while wearing a watch did its thickness ever cross my mind. I find it interesting it’s such a talking point right now. Like I know some of my watches are thicker than my others but it was never something I factored into my decision making
Have you ever tried on a James Cameron Deepsea? I have a Submariner, an old Explorer II, a Tudor GMT and a Speedmaster. I tried on the JC Deepsea and its thickness is ridiculous. Looked a nice watch but absolutely horrid on and for that reason would never buy.
@@chops6890 I have and to tell you the truth that didn’t bother me either. I am a bigger guy who lifts a lot of weights so for my size and shape I think I notice case size a lot more than I notice thickness.
Thickness is just one parameter. It is the overall case proportion that is important. Thick case with small diameter make the watch look stubby. Whereas same case thickness but larger diameter make the watch looks perfect. So consider all parameters holistically. As mentioned, always try the watch in the flesh before passing any final judgement.
That's what she said.
The BB Pro is a cheaper homage of the 1655 👎
I agree no originality who wants a 4k homage. At least the Pelagos either version have their own identity unlike the Tudor Pro
It's a fine looking watch at a good size so it ought to be a big seller for them. I reckon the sizing is spot on as well. The domed crystal increases the thickness somewhat but the end result is worth it. Still won't be buying one though.
Amazing watch, great review :) .
Thick or not to thick…for me this is not the right question! Tudor somehow has the ability to hit the jackpot (BB58 925….and now the pro)!
Hi Adrian, thanks for the video...do you reckon that the new Longines Zulu Time GMT could be a competitor for this watch, i feel they have similar specs and I don't know which one I'd chose over the other
I actually prefer the "bad lighting" for content, because they're much accurate on how the watch looks like in real life..
Over polished pictures is a bit too cheugy now in 2022
So true about the waitlist BS and luxury experience, love your opinion
Nice video!
Yes it is… but it’s Tudor. We all love it anyway 😎😅