An impossible dilemma: crews of three

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @warren6891
    @warren6891 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When was in the Pump was not allowed to move till at least 4 firefighters on it.

  • @ice-p7w
    @ice-p7w 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    West Midlands rides crews of 2 on pick up trucks. Sometime for property fires there is 3 pick up trucks, hylux type riding 2. Then a PRL riding 3 or 4 So they get a magic number of 8 personnel😮.

  • @robertjenks9641
    @robertjenks9641 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What about the additional resources that would be sent when it was made a property fire? Any Preplan is about the risk it presents. Tac-Vent - 8 etc. Base it on resources (people needed), not 'pumps' numbers etc.

  • @EnidAgnusDei
    @EnidAgnusDei 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    5 or min of 4 but 3 no way ever, simply not safe and should be illegal.

  • @MariaHernandez-c5n
    @MariaHernandez-c5n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Howell Key

  • @beeluckydowntheplot7394
    @beeluckydowntheplot7394 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why have things gone backwards........H & S E must get involved as its requirement for the the employer to provide safe systems of work....... ie 5 crew on a one pump station, and 5 and 4 on a two pump station, .Everything that was discussed in the video was in place once. Why is no longer there!!!!

  • @daveallsopp320
    @daveallsopp320 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    3 is beggars belief

  • @ShannonBelt-x6n
    @ShannonBelt-x6n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fritsch Hill

  • @HuttVita-w2o
    @HuttVita-w2o 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thomas Thomas Robinson Karen Lee Anthony

  • @roydelta1
    @roydelta1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There are several issues here not black and white. In some circumstances three could have dealt with the car fire and prevented escalation 🤔

    • @Type1Kiddos
      @Type1Kiddos 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      "In some circumstances."
      So just send a pump with three on and hope for those exact circumstances?
      Alternatively, send an adequately crewed appliance that can deal with these circumstances and others!
      Not complicated, really.

    • @andrewgeorge6468
      @andrewgeorge6468 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Did you watch the video?? The job has escalated before they got there. 🙄 like many jobs do.
      Of course three people “COULD” deal with a car fire. However crewing three people on an appliance for all eventualities is dangerous.
      An appliance ridership is determined for the duration of a shift not for each job they are called to.

    • @topp342
      @topp342 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Sending out trucks with any less than 5 is a race to the bottom.

    • @mikeford4235
      @mikeford4235 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This was normal in the 90s when we actually went to and delt with fires.
      Bigger issue is so many stations off the run . Yes you have to balance firefighter safety but when 60% or more of a brigades stations are off the run because they are crew deficient.
      It's ridiculous when a station is unavailable with a crew of 5 because there BA deficient and not turned out to an RTC 500 yards from the station.
      House fire a crew of 3 can put a ladder up to a window and save a life. I know I've done it or wait 20 minutes plus for next available crew and the person dies or PC plod or public have a go.
      Ideal world all crews should have 5 but that not realistic when stations are so short .

    • @patheticcube20
      @patheticcube20 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As a good friend of mine, who is in the fire service, says “plan for the worst, hope for the best”