As I understand it it is actually abrogation not dualism. 2:106. Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We {Allah} abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar to it. Know you not that Allah is able to do all things? So where as earlier verses were peaceful, they were abrogated and later verses are the ones in effect which are the many calls for violence So is there really dualism or is it just abrogation? It appears that earlier peaceful verses were abrogated according to the Koran itself in the above verse. Guess Allah realized he got it wrong with the whole peace angle.
Thank you, Dr. Bill Warner. You have given humanity an important lesson. Devout Muslims are not allowed to question their scriptures. It is up to the non-Muslims to point out the insanity of Muslim dualism. This needs to be shared everywhere.
This guy looks like he knows what he is talking about only it stays on that talking talking talking . I am a proud Muslim I believe in allah and I think this message is made to deceive I approve this message
The Ghassanids remained a Byzantine vassal state until its rulers and the eastern Byzantine Empire were overthrown by the Muslims in the 7th century, following the Battle of Yarmuk in 636 AD. At the time of the Muslim conquest the Ghassanids were no longer united by the same Christian faiths: some of them accepted union with the Byzantine Chalcedonian church; others remained faithful to Monophysitism and a significant number of them maintained their Christian religious identity and decided to side with the Muslim armies to emphasize their loyalty to their Arabic roots and in recognition of the wider context of a rising Arab Empire under the veil of Islam; And now, no ones remembers them.
Islam is dualistic and the Quran is mess up. Quran is not arranged chronologically rather it is arranged from the longest chapter to the shortest chapter. Some part of the story is in first part, some in middle and some in last part. So it is a complete mess. You need to read hadith in order to understand Quran.
Concerning the verse: "You have your religion, I have mine", one has to read the whole verse to find out, to WHOM this was addressed and the true meaning! Mohammed talked to the unbelievers. Therefore this is an insult, NOT a proof of tolerance!
Zoroastrianism is also dualistic, but not contradictory like Islam. It teaches that there is constant conflicts between good and evil in the form of the gods Ahura-Mazda and Angri- Manyu, and that eventually good will defeat evil.
The whole idea of dualism is to have self-contradictory meanings within it, the good and evil are two sides of the same coin but the moral law is objective, for example killing is bad but in the context of self-defeating in a war i have no choice but to kill my enemy, we don't turn the other cheek we're not Christians.
Please note he is speaking of his own opinion and he is false. He requires more spirtual knowledge on both Islam and dualism. Sir, no need to delve far into psychology in aspects you are inaccurate of. As far as the verses in the Quran that are not "very nice", I will disagree for only one reason being that, we all know the holy books were revealed very long ago. ~It was a different day and age. Things were stricter in many aspects, the world was viewed differently and boundries were set as mankind learned. Otherwise people could have literally took on an act of animals. An example: Mini skits; Mini skirts developed over time. They were not appropriate in the past, and as the population become more "open minded" they became a norm. So aside from religion if a woman were to have worn one in the past (long ago) she may have underwent shame. Is that also not very nice (shame)? The holy books save mankind from corruption and shame, religiously the devil teaches otherwise. We know right from wrong (educated individuals). Those who seek knowledge will eventually find belief very accurate. One with keen expierence may know that good things take people to the right places and vice versa. اشْهَدُ انْ لّآ اِلهَ اِلَّا اللّهُ وَ اَشْهَدُ اَنَّ مُحَمَّدً اعَبْدُه وَرَسُولُه. ❤❤❤
Great stuff. As usual. Keep up the good fight.
I thank you Bill for your devotion to this cause. I can't express my gratitude enough to you. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.
As I understand it it is actually abrogation not dualism.
2:106. Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We {Allah} abrogate or cause to
be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar to it. Know you not that
Allah is able to do all things?
So where as earlier verses were peaceful, they were abrogated and later verses are the ones in effect which are the many calls for violence So is there really dualism or is it just abrogation? It appears that earlier peaceful verses were abrogated according to the Koran itself in the above verse. Guess Allah realized he got it wrong with the whole peace angle.
Outstanding explanation. Everyone should watch this video.
He don't know what he talks about
Thank you, Dr. Bill Warner. You have given humanity an important lesson. Devout Muslims are not allowed to question their scriptures. It is up to the non-Muslims to point out the insanity of Muslim dualism. This needs to be shared everywhere.
You forgot to mention that the later verses abrogate the earlier verses
This guy looks like he knows what he is talking about only it stays on that talking talking talking . I am a proud Muslim I believe in allah and I think this message is made to deceive I approve this message
The Ghassanids remained a Byzantine vassal state until its rulers and the eastern Byzantine Empire were overthrown by the Muslims in the 7th century, following the Battle of Yarmuk in 636 AD. At the time of the Muslim conquest the Ghassanids were no longer united by the same Christian faiths: some of them accepted union with the Byzantine Chalcedonian church; others remained faithful to Monophysitism and a significant number of them maintained their Christian religious identity and decided to side with the Muslim armies to emphasize their loyalty to their Arabic roots and in recognition of the wider context of a rising Arab Empire under the veil of Islam; And now, no ones remembers them.
Islam is dualistic and the Quran is mess up. Quran is not arranged chronologically rather it is arranged from the longest chapter to the shortest chapter. Some part of the story is in first part, some in middle and some in last part. So it is a complete mess. You need to read hadith in order to understand Quran.
Everything in context make sense
Concerning the verse: "You have your religion, I have mine", one has to read the whole verse to find out, to WHOM this was addressed and the true meaning! Mohammed talked to the unbelievers. Therefore this is an insult, NOT a proof of tolerance!
What is dualism !!?
Zoroastrianism is also dualistic, but not contradictory like Islam. It teaches that there is constant conflicts between good and evil in the form of the gods Ahura-Mazda and Angri- Manyu, and that eventually good will defeat evil.
The whole idea of dualism is to have self-contradictory meanings within it, the good and evil are two sides of the same coin but the moral law is objective, for example killing is bad but in the context of self-defeating in a war i have no choice but to kill my enemy, we don't turn the other cheek we're not Christians.
You are contradictory... you know nothing about Islam
very narrow minded and ignorant way to understand both view points
Poor boy
Please note he is speaking of his own opinion and he is false. He requires more spirtual knowledge on both Islam and dualism.
Sir, no need to delve far into psychology in aspects you are inaccurate of.
As far as the verses in the Quran that are not "very nice", I will disagree for only one reason being that, we all know the holy books were revealed very long ago.
~It was a different day and age. Things were stricter in many aspects, the world was viewed differently and boundries were set as mankind learned. Otherwise people could have literally took on an act of animals.
An example: Mini skits; Mini skirts developed over time. They were not appropriate in the past, and as the population become more "open minded" they became a norm. So aside from religion if a woman were to have worn one in the past (long ago) she may have underwent shame. Is that also not very nice (shame)?
The holy books save mankind from corruption and shame, religiously the devil teaches otherwise. We know right from wrong (educated individuals). Those who seek knowledge will eventually find belief very accurate. One with keen expierence may know that good things take people to the right places and vice versa.
اشْهَدُ انْ لّآ اِلهَ اِلَّا اللّهُ وَ اَشْهَدُ اَنَّ مُحَمَّدً اعَبْدُه وَرَسُولُه. ❤❤❤