Craziest LEGO Hot Takes...
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ธ.ค. 2023
- These LEGO hot takes are ridiculous!
🔔 SUBSCRIBE for more LEGO videos!
👍 Leave a LIKE if you enjoy!
Get ready for a wild ride through the world of LEGO as we dive into the hottest LEGO hot takes! From controversial set designs to unexpected collaborations, we're spilling the tea on the most debated aspects of the LEGO community. Brace yourself for a rollercoaster of opinions and surprises that will leave you questioning everything you thought you knew about LEGO. Enjoy!
Comment your LEGO hot take below!
Watch More LEGO Videos:
➝ LEGO Sets That Break The Rules - • LOTS OF LEGO SETS THAT...
➝ 0 IQ LEGO Sets - • 0 IQ LEGO SETS...
➝ LEGO Misprints - • Very Rare LEGO Misprin...
🛒 SpitBrix Brick Posters Available Now: spitbrix.com
📦 LEGO deals on Amazon: amzn.to/3NFtxg2
📬 Business Email: contact@spitbrix.com
Have a great day!
#lego - บันเทิง
What is your LEGO hot take? Comment below!
My hot take: P2 clone helmet holes are not that bad; I barely notice them.
Hot take 2: Printed waist capes would be fine if they just printed the sides of the legs...
…but the backs...
Ok, if they just dual molded the legs and printed the front...
…but the insides of the legs...
…and the white print would undoubtedly be so bad... … …
Ok, forget it!
Cold take: get RID OF printed waist capes and BRING BACK CLOTH!!
Hot take:make Lego flags
LEGO fortnite is good
Hot take 1: Lego themes with app functionality like Lego Super Mario are good and shouldn't receive as much hate as they do
Hot take 2: Technic sets are HORRIBLE to build, building Lego sets is supposed to be fun but Technic sets are not, they take too long, even small ones
@@mpsuperstar88 Do you mean cloth, plastic (like they had a while ago), or irl flags?
Hot take: I want to see less licensed themes. Like get that themes like Star Wars and Marvel saved lego back in the day, but nowadays they're front and center, taking up all of the attention, while original themes are typically taking a back seat. This is despite the fact that some of the most popular lego themes are original ones
Also, less of a hot take, but I really want to see the return of actual play sets. Sets with genuine play features, knobs, buttons, levers, that sort of thing. So many sets released today are geared more towards display - regardless of theme
(I wish would lego bring back a castle theme too, tho that's just a pipe dream)
This one I agree on too, we NEED more original and unique themes
Sooooo true! Glad to see I'm not alone.
Amusing how technic kind of fits into here: more licensed vehicles with less features
I want castle back 😢
Honestly as someone that has recently begun frequently going to a Lego big store, watching what people have been buying, at least at the location I frequent, it’s close to even between City, Friends, Star Wars, and Marvel, followed by Creator and Harry Potter, technic, and then ninjago, monkie kid, minecraft, Mario, and Icons. The theme I see the least bought so far is the brand new sonic stuff, as well as the few Disney sets there are. And then Duplo but that’s it’s own little thing offset from the other themes
The retirement of the buildable figures like HeroFactory and Bionicle was a terrible choice, especially since they fit in with so many other themes like how they did in StarWars and Chima, The cancelation of Chima was also a mistake.
Dude I loved the bionicle hero factory and I never understood the hate towards it personally
@bukachell I'm right there with you. From what I heard, it sounds like the people that hated Bionicle did so because they preferred the classic Lego sets with bricks rather that the extension of their Technic line that Bionicle is; this is reflected in the most recent Bionicle products we got as well, those being 2 different brick-built versions of Tahu -- one of which being barely bigger than a standard mini figure and having a pretty goofy design with googly eyes, and the other being an upscaled version of the toa of fire that was quite possible and was depicted surfing of lava like we see on the original set's packaging. Unfortunately, it seems to be largely because of the prominence of fans that share this opinion that was what ultimately killed the constraction line, probably because most people think of sets with bricks when the think of Lego, and Bionicle -- as well as other constraction lines -- do not tend to incorporate into their builds. That being said, Bionicle was a very unique line that had lots of great characters and an epic story to go along with it, so it would definitely be nice to see it make a return one day
@@matthewkuscienko4616 Yeah compare the CCBS Star Wars line to the modern constraction Marvel sets (Iron Man, Spider-Man, Wolverine, etc.). Very different approaches to constraction. If Bionicle were to return by some miracle, and used bricks like the Marvel constraction, I think some fans would like it for the nostalgia, but ultimately reject it for similar reasons to their rejection of the 2015-2016 CCBS Bionicle; it simply isn't pure Technic anymore. I would love them to bring back a Technic version of Bionicle. Essentially, go back to the basics of what it was, which Technic is missing; not just vehicles, but Technic characters and Technic animals. If not Bionicle, at least give us that. Bionicle fans would latch onto that just fine.
Oh for sure, I LOVED those unique parts, all they needed to do was integrate ways to add standard lego elements and turn bionicle figs into mech suits for minifigs
"B-b-b-b-but bionicles are just goofy alien robots, and, uhhh, cheema= furries on drugs, ninjago bettah"
-👶
Hot take - the lego board games were really fun and the series should have been continued :)
That's not a hot take that's just facts
@@jeffbagels7866agreed
Still mad I never got ahold of the pirate chess set
had those for christmas as a kid, I played those games with my family more than actual board games
Coldest take ever.
The heavy focus on licenced themes is what kills it for me. There used to be so many original themes that would come out each year (Power Miners, Space Police, Agents, etc.), but now we only have a few per decade
I would argue it wasn't licensed themes, but instead Ninjago, Lego City, and Lego Friends. These themes are so popular that they indirectly make other "successor" themes, like Lego Chima, fail miserably.
Lego rockraiders
@@polus134 Rockraiders was so good. Roboriders were so awesome too.
If we get a giant UCS style pirate ship I'll cream
Yeah Playmobil also started doing that a few years ago, at the end that is where they get more money so they continue with the formula. It is sad.
Warm-Take: You can usually fit smaller LEGO boxes inside larger ones for easier storage. Granted if you have a LOT of smaller sets this will not always work, and sometimes boxes may not fit perfectly so try not to warp them by shoving them inside each other, but more often than not, you can save a lot of space with this method.
oh, do other people not do that? lol. i always thought this was already the deluxe way of storing boxes compared to folding them open or straight up trashing them.
Another warm take: You can also flatten Lego boxes by cutting both ends of them. Just gotta refold and tape them again, they are boxes after all.
Another warm take: you can just chuck out the boxes
I bought the Daily Bugle a couple weeks ago, still got the box, not thinking in getting rid of it. When I buy more sets, I will keep their boxes inside the Daily Bugle box 👍🏼
Hotter take: Break down your boxes for easier storage
I think that they should release a huge Minifigure collection with tons of torsos and legs and arms and heads like they do with the creator sets and the brick sets.
Agreed. I'd also love to see a collection of clear display pieces. 1x2 bricks the jumping display pegs from the CMFs, those long pole things (idk what they're called but they have 2 studs on one end, a long pole and one stud near the other end?).
They're really useful for displays and it's hard to get a lot of them.
My "hot take" is that lego should bring back sets with full hero factory/ bionicle parts.
Lego could totally get some good sale from new sets with those themes, even if there isn't any story to go with them. At least they have those buildable "action" figures that aren't as good as the classic ones though. I was born 4 years after the first bionicle set and story released and still really like them.
No. Nonononono
@@legodj831
If you're going to say no, at least give a reason why. Otherwise your input is kinda pointless.
I absolutely agree about throwing boxes away. They just take up space and if I am going to buy a set, then I am buying it to keep it, not to sell it.
EXACTLYYY. as a kid, why would i keep the boxes if i thought that i was going to keep the set forever?
or flatten & put in a drawer
Well some of the boxes are so nice they are worth keeping for the more expensive set. I hate boxes are basically art, it makes it really hard to throw away :/
Only box I've kept is the Bugatti Chiron. If I had other similar caliber sets I'd probably keep the boxes from those as well. I don't know if I'll ever need it but it feels wrong to get rid of such a nice box
@@oxolotleman7226 fair enough. I was mostly talking about keeping the box to every set you get. It makes sense to keep the box to your more expensive sets or ones that mean a lot to you.
I USED to mix all the bags’ pieces together before building, but it was too hard to find things. I did like how it slowed me down, but I would take up to 5 minutes to find pieces. It’s not worth it imo.
Your sins have been forgiven
yea, it just makes things frustrating, even if it does technically lengthen the activity. if people want to spend a longer time on a set then just get a bigger set.
If I was to mix the bags I think I would sort the bags as I open them. either into categories or by individual brick type.
though that sounds like more effort than i would want before placing 2 bricks together no matter how cool it may imagine to see the neatly organized parts laid out and ready to build.
Knock-off sets usually don't care about sorting pieces, so digging through the mountains of pieces was all the childhood to me.
Yes, I'm so poor I usually buy knock-offs.
Yes, I spent less money, while still having fun with copies of official sets.
Yes, I love digging through the mountains of pieces. I've no such weaknesses.
@@supercat765 That’s true!
Although themes based on third-party franchises have been around for a long time (Star Wars and Harry Potter for example), the fact that they comprise the majority of sets now feels corporate and uninspired. LEGO takes much fewer risks with their own themes and that's disappointing. Bionicle, Mars Mission, Alpha Team, Dino Attack etc. were memorable in their own right without piggybacking off popular franchises.
I think people forget that adult collectors are literally grown up kids who enjoy Lego
Well put
So…manchildren?
@@Zorro9129you are watching a video on lego
@@ruddogcolledoggy8560 true true
Hot take:
I really enjoy the physics of Legos crashing against things and then rebuilding the parts that fall off. I especially do this with vehicle sets like cars.
I had an open-wheel race car Technic set when I was a kid that had more than a few broken pieces from me doing this.
Its a really good hot take
you sound like 10-year-old me
Hot take, I personally cut out the front and back from the lego boxes so I can keep part of them without taking up that much room :)
That is not a bad idea.
I've been a Lego fan for close to 20 years and I appreciate the adult sets that are satisfying to build and a great challenge 😊
just glad to be your 69th liker
As a younger individual, I also can say I love the adult sets
Hot take: Lego should stop using stickers. I can't stress enough how annoying it is to see my old sets filled with stickers that are peeling off, or the frustration that comes after applying a sticker slightly wrong. They should either replace the stickers with printed pieces or just not add the detail at all. Also, Lego should stop slacking off with the printing quality. Pretty much every single new minifigure has noticeable printing errors.
I think you don't know what a hot take is
I really hate stickers, especially round and square ones. It’s very hard to align all the sides at once. I hate the stickers slanted or not being centered but there is only so much that I can do with my eyes and big fingers.
Agreed. I had to bring out sculpting tools for various sets just because I did not want to have to replace stickers numerous times, and they STILL are peeling!
@@feuerreiteroderso8655 It's not my fault that all my opinions are objectively right ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
do you even know how expensive that would be to make prints for every single set? especially for sets with tons of stickers? it would rack up the price significantly. not everything can be a print.
Not sure if this is a hot take, but we need more Lego Trains. Where we only get a few sets a year, most being very simple, most aren't that good. I can give an exception to the Orient Express and the Emerald night though. Lego makes so many different elements for car wheels, chassis, and widows while steam trains have had the same wheels for years. Many of us train fans have to turn to other sources to build accurate scale models.
I’ve always wanted a LEGO train set since I was a child, but I still don’t have one.
More steam locomotives, yes. I want the engines but the price then bloats with incredibly detailed passenger cars and I just don't care about that. They could do a whole themed line with different steam locomotives.
lego and real life trains 👍
I just want different Lego vehicles not sports cars. Like gimme Lego rv. Lego Toyota, like make it speed champion scale and it would be amazing
@@Wolfbroa One of my favorite lego sets ever was a campervan made a few years back just because it was a normal vehicle, it's really annoying to not have normal cars when building cities, because they just become full of supercars/
Stud shooters ruin the fun of a gun piece. It completely breaks the immersion of a piece and won't let you customise it. I loved putting different pieces on Star Wars blasters to turn them into different things, their barrels are perfect for different kinds of muzzles and allow the claw lock pieces to add flat 1/1 pieces to them acting like magazines or flashlight or whatnot. The same can be said about the megaphone piece which acted as a Star Wars blaster in my days. It allows for creativity and imagination. Stud shooters are just chunky and ugly
based opinion honestly, I used to love putting screwdrivers, lightsaber hilts, etc for attachments on my guns xD
When I was a kid it really frustrated me to play with the stud shooters cause I always got the stud shot by mistake and then had to search thr damn stud xd
5:00
'I don't get how ppl buy sets just for minifigures instead of using bricklink'.
Well, guess how set-exclusive minifigures appear on bricklink.
Battle packs are an exeption though as the whole point of a battle pack is the mini figures.
@@JawasJunkyard Definitely. I'm not a fan of SW or Marvel so I didn't even know there were battle packs :)
My ideas:
1) LEGO should begin re-adding older colors and pieces back as individually purchasable items (like an online pick-a-brick), especially re-doing old colors in new parts designs. Colors like Sand Purple and Sand Red, parts like older diving armor accessories, remakes of older Bionicle parts but in new colors - all of these would be amazing.
2) LEGO as a company doesn't do *enough* recolors. Gimme the parts to make one of the Exo-Force mechs in a different color scheme, or the parts to redo a Tie-Fighter with an alternate palette. These would be things that a lot of people would love, but never get enough of.
3) They should make a digital Build-A-Minifig purchasing option whenever a new theme comes out that is just options related to that theme, and keep them available until the parts run out.
Man, I miss sand red
Minifigs are already available through the online Pick-A-Brick system (which, yes, actually does exist. It's kinda hard to find on LEGO's website, you have to open the drop-town menu and select "pick and build"). As for everything else, the problem with those ideas is that they don't work with LEGO's production model. Pick-A-Brick is entirely sold from excess inventory, and it's not financially viable to produce parts and colors specifically just for that service. LEGO actually used to produce service packs back in the 90s and early 2000s, some of which included parts that weren't available any other way, and I wouldn't be surprised if that contributed to LEGO's financial difficulties.
I used to build from piles without sorting. It was kind of fun, in the same sense that a "Where's Waldo" book is fun. Definitely slowed down the build, but I kind of enjoyed hunting for the pieces. My biggest hot take is that minifigures and big display sets(like most UCS star wars sets) are overrated; the real value of Lego sets to me comes from the cleverness in their design and engineering, most often found in how they fit play features or details in models without compromising the aesthetic. A huge amount of praise went to the recent UCS Venator, but I personally find it boring because it has nothing to offer other than outward appearances. Nothing clever or neat about its internal design: just your basic skeletal supports surrounded by a plated exterior. I would've been all over that set if it had a micro-scale accessible interior, even if it bumped the cost up a couple hundred.
Imo minifigs are important for the aesthetic. Of course they're nothing special, and posing them or anything doesn't require much work or effort, but they add to a scene depending on what it is. If I build the Emperor's throne room from Star Wars it would be kinda boring if the Emperor wasn't sitting on the throne, for example. Or a medieval town with a busy market and some guards. That's a completely different aesthetic fun thing than the building technique aspect
@@bighatastrea I agree in that they're good set pieces to complete a scene, but I think they're overhyped as far as their individual value. Granted, I never got into collectible figures, so that might be part of it.
I like doing that with set that have 5 or fewer bags,
Idk if this is a hot-take, but I definitely think Lego needs to release more ball joint and clip pieces, like a bar with a ball and clip on each end to make smaller yet more flexible things, in addition to that I think they should be making more custom-built mech sets that don’t always use ball joints as the prime way of moving the arms and legs, especially when there are so many other ways of doing so.
For the boxes, if you like the artwork on the front you could cut out just the front portion, use it as a backdrop or even have film in a pile. It's a lot easier to store. A single sheet of cardboard than it is to have multiple boxes of different shapes around
Thats what I did with one of the gundam kit boxes I have (MG Barbatos)
The sticker placement dude is 100% a gundam fan
Yep
I wish they'd update and rerun much older non-licensed sets that have been out of print for a long time even if they've discontinued the theme or something like that, it'd be a nice organic way to make some pieces less rare and they can show how they've innovated their manufacturing and construction techniques
I’d love to see old city-themed sets from the late-90s and early 2000s get released again.
His response to there being too many sets over a hundred was… “yeah well the sets are bigger”
That’s just restating the question. Yeah there’s too many and there’s little to no focus on sets that aren’t so much. Hell a lot of smaller sets practically look like scams for how little they are putting in them relative to years prior. Kinda hard to be into the hobby when you can’t partake in it
I wound up asking my mom how much sets usually go for because she's bought a lot for my siblings, BC I was genuinely astounded to see some of the littler sets going for $50 on the official site.
Lego has lost its heart and soul as a company. It's no longer a toy company first and foremost, but an adult collectors' company.
Depends what you like really. I like city and it’s still great. I don’t need $500 gray Star Wars sets so I’m not missing out
@@rotationalbox588 Their strong focus on creating large expensive sets for adult collectors diverts time and resources that could be spent on making the types of sets that made them the powerhouse they are today. Quality control has also suffered quite a bit in the process.
usa usa
@@billynomates920 ???
Yea it doesn't feel like there are many kids in the community, it feels like it's only adults with some teens here and there
I'd kill for a new line of buildable technic figures. They'd have to incorporate the mixel joints into technic parts to allow for smaller figures that could fit in most sets of a certain scale.
I honestly used to build my sets with all the bags opened in one pile. Didn't realize how difficult this made my building experience. Finally came to the conclusion and realization that the bags are numbered for a reason. Took me way to long to realize lol. But never going back. It's so much more easier and organized for the parts to be found.
My hot take is that I stopped playing the Lego games since the Lego movie games because I always hated the realistic backgrounds and the Lego movie games proved that they can make entire worlds out of Lego, but they don’t. I get that it might be on purpose to make those games unique, but it’s uncanny to me and I don’t think it should be called a Lego game if the only thing that’s Lego are the things you interact with and the minifigs…
Lego worlds was the last game with a completely blocky style
@@Nae_ex I think I remember that game vaguely…
Try LEGO: Worlds, it's on pretty much every platform except mobile, the world is made completely of LEGO, and there isn't any licenced content.
Ok my hot take is knockoff Lego figures aren’t so bad, the customs look amazing (most of the time) and real Lego can cost too much now a days
Esspecially if lego either won’t make the figure or the one time they did was 10 years ago and it’s worth a fortune now. I have one of those brick minifigure display cases for my spiderverse collection and most of that entire bottom row are all bootlegs for those 2 reasons.
Have you ever heard of Cobi?
@@jsmithy643oh yeah I’ve heard of cobi bryan, the famous cricket player
There’s these nock off Lego murder drones sets that look awesome
There are some custom ones that are really cool, but there are a lot of cheap knock-offs as well
I don't think that taking apart LEGO sets in reverse order is as bad as people say. It makes it easier to rebuild the set
Yes! I do this all the time, I thought everyone did
I think the play or display answer is quite simple. Its up to you. Nobody can stop you from playing with the set or not. You determine whether the risk of damaging it through play is worth it
My hot take: P2 clone helmet holes are not that bad; I barely notice them.
Hot take 2: Printed waist capes would be fine if they just printed the sides of the legs...
…but the backs...
Ok, if they just dual molded the legs and printed the front...
…but the insides of the legs...
…and the white print would undoubtedly be so bad... … …
Ok, forget it! Cold take: get RID OF printed waist capes and BRING BACK CLOTH!!
My hot take is that yeah legos have turned into a adults collector toy, but it’s sure fun building them, right?
Eh, depends on the set. Sets like the Eifel Tower or Daily Bugle are a bit of a slog, honestly, due to the number of repeat steps in their construction. But some of the other ones, like the El Dorado Fortress, are really fun or at least a good way to learn new building techniques.
Whenever someone says "the larger sets aren't for play" I flash back to watching my kid cousin pick up his star destroyer I bought him for his birthday and helped him built.
He hefted it over his head, and javelined it into his sister.
It was the most fun we'd had in years.
My LEGO hot-take, is that they should do more sets like the old monster sets, and old ninjago sets. I remember having a lot of fun especially with the ninjago vehicle sets, making my own versions of the vechiles, taking inspiration from the instructions but over all doing my own thing.
I honestly don’t mind stickers in sets. I’m used to putting together Gundam kits which can have an incredibly high sticker count and incredibly small stickers, so it’s not a big deal to me.
hot take: constraction should be seen as part of lego's core identity
Unity, Duty, Destiny brother.
My hot take: most Lego sculptures just seem like someone put a 3d model into a voxelizer algorithm and don't make any creative use of the Lego whatsoever.
this plus the dots versions of existing art, that look like they just threw a picture of Darth Vader into a pixelizer. technically starry night and the wave has at least a little bit of creativity, making a few 3d elements and using regular Lego pieces. but "80 bucks for a paint- I mean DOT by number" is just scummy imo
I want hero factory to return, the toys were awesome because even if you destroyed the original character. you can always make your own character, using pieces from the sets. Hero factory was my bionicle, and i felt pain for when it went all wrong at the end rather then it ending
My Lego was in a large plastic storage box, driving my mother crazy when I was digging for that 1x1 headlight lens or a small antennae. 😆
Here's a hot take specifically for Lego Star Wars: There is way too much focus on clones these days, to the expense of everything else. I'm just not *that* much of a clone fan. Make more droids, more rebels, more Jedi. We don't need 20 different kinds of clones with tiny color differences.
we need an Umbra line- the possibilities of SNOT for the fighters and tank are so dope
Make more general grevious minifigures
How about a middle leg for our astromechs? lol
When you think about it the lego magazines are just a minifigure with a booklet
Hot take- we need sub 50$ castle sets and lotr sets. Bring back minifigures packs from the 80s castle sets
Merry Christmas Spit Brix!
When I got the LEGO Rivendell set, it was already pre-owned and built, so I had to take it all apart and scatter the parts all around with no place or order. The build took like a week and a half, I had to like jump from manual to another if I got stuck on one section of the build.
HT1:Put MORE spare pieces into bags, (studs, minifig accessories, small blasters, 1*1 or 1*2 tiles...)
HT2: Make military themed sets. People (including me) are making literally WORKING WEAPONS that can shoot lego bullets, but LEGO wont make a non working minifig scaled tank or a jet fighter. i know that lego doesnt like violence and guns, but why do we have Lego Star wars then?
Hot take: at this point, I’m getting ready to start opening a small business to make some Lego custom legs and arms for mini fingers so they can finally bend around. I’m tired of laying around and I can’t do barely anything.
My hot take is that Lego needs more simplicity. I think there's a real beauty in the simplistic blockyness of older sets and the (IMO) much better designed minifig prints we used to get. In my eyes Exo Force was one of the last themes to look really amazing, although of course there's still the odd set here and there that impresses me
liking because I do not aggree
My opinion is purely based on nostalgia, but I think the city-themed sets from the 90s to early 2000s struck a nice balance of being detailed but not over specialized.
I like stepping on bricks. It feels calming.
Same
@@LV426Resident same its satisfying
Bionicle deserves to Rest in Peace after all that its done, it doesn't need a reboot, Hero Factory was the only worthy successor to it, and was the last Lego theme i was truly invested in
1:49 actually, I used to do that with stuff I created myself. I usually made Lego guns back then, so as to being able to rebuild them some day I just dissasembled them step by step, taking a picture each time. So if I want to build it again I just need to look at my images in reverse order.
Hot take:Lego speed champions is the best theme
Not exactly true in my opinion, but Speed Champions is the best theme nowadays.
I remember when my brother mixed all the bags in my favourite Lego set and I came home from school to find a mess on the floor and my bro just giggled!😢
I wouldn't mind minifigures with knees.
Doesn't need them, but it's certainly welcome for more unique displays.
Lego should make a movie-accurate Venom (minifig and bigfig)
I step on Lego for fun. So when I'm playing I build A tolerance for it.
Ill admit, lego minifigures having bendable knees would be neat, but the engineering process at that scale would be a nightmare. You'd probably have to use the longer legs from the Avatar Way of Water minifigures to make it easier. And even then, making the attachment points secure while keeping the posabily is still a challenge
I think a much more feasable way to boost posability is to just add bendable elbows that slot in in a similar way as the tecnic pins or the pin-and-socket wheels (but on a smaller scale), this will also make it easier for lego to make minifigs in say, short sleeves or long gloves even in the few times they are used
Hot take: WE. NEED. INDIVIDUAL. MINIFIGURES.
dumping the bags all at once is absolutely painful
I actually understand the first one. Building it by bag number definitely helps the first time you build a set, but what if you want to take it apart and build it all over again? Then bag numbers are no longer an option anymore. So doing it all at once the first time just feels like every other time you build the set.
Very simple. When you take the set apart, put it in ziploc bags and number them as you go in reverse.
@@trev3971like the way the 3rd guy does it?
2:50
This is something I very much agree with. The new Lego Concorde set that released in September was something I have been waiting for for a while now (i've always wanted a proper plane that exists irl, not some weird ass lego plane) and in Australia where I live, it was originally $200. I was planning to buy it and went on the website to check again and the price INFLATED to $300. Safe to say I'm not gonna buy that set anymore.
I took my lego typewriter apart in reverse when I was rebuilding it, but thats mostly because it's so complex that there's really only one correct way to take it apart
I would love to see the technic-scale minifigures to make a comeback. They have the simplicity and charm of classic minifigures but they can be used for larger-scale dioramas.
Hot take: almost every Lego Minecraft character is inaccurate
Yes
Indeedaly doo mister sir
Hot take: you are right
I did the first one (dumping all pieces in one bin) for the NASA Apollo Saturn V 92176. It took MONTHS (I wasn't working on it every day).
In that period, a friends' child was born and a family member past away (old age, in her bed).
I was almost sad when the build was over. When reflecting back, all the real life things that happened, it was quite a ride.
My Lego hot take: *The 1x5 plate looks so cursed.*
I recently got the Star Wars Executor Super Star Destroyer (75356), and it comes with one dark-grey 1x5 plate, and the part honestly looks so "off-brand". It seems like a part you'd find in a Mega Construx set, but a Lego set? No way. Maybe it's just me, but any odd-numbered 1x[X] plates (other than 1x1 and 1x3) just seem unnatural for official Lego parts.
I love the LEGO Builder app. The fact that you can rotate and zoom the model rather than being stuck with the fixed perspective of the printed manuals is super convenient. (Also the fact you can easily browse the instructions for sets you don't own, and it even has previews for upcoming sets.)
Actually, for someone who enjoys tediously searching and spending more time on a Lego set, that first one I might try this Christmas. It would also be really satisfying as you watch the massive pile get smaller and smaller.
2:45 That poor parrot! 😢 🦜🗑🪦
2:00
Personally I see if I can break my set into sections that I can easily put together from memory or by just looking at the box.
In defense of the knees idea, Mega has figures with working knees and elbows without being very much larger than a typical Lego minifig. Take a look at their Halo figures for example.
The issue is longevity, though. Those Halo minifigs start falling apart and breaking really fast. The joints get loose and they can't even hold up their own weight after a very short amount of play sessions.
Yes, some R&D could be done to improve the longevity, but when it comes down to it, the plastic is just too thin in the joints, and they are going to break with wear.
Wouldn't it be great if the post on top of a Minifigure torso was a simple ball joint? Imagine how much more expressive they could look with slight head tilts...
That would be cool, but I think that would make the neck too tall, especially if Lego were to use their standard ball joint. There would also be a color problem, or else the ball on the torso would have to be a separate piece. But it would be cool if they could do this!
I’ve seen these ball- joint necks on clego (clone Lego) mini figs, and they do little to increase the length of said joint. So I agree that it would be cool if Lego did this
I like disassembling technic sets into numbered bags and later rebuilding them. I've done this with both the Ford GT and the Peugeot Le Mans Hypercar. More than 1,750 technic parts for the Peugeot.
5:12 most I spent was the flower fruit mountain and I wanted maquac. But this was before the better versions came out and at the time I didn’t know if they’d make a new one
dumping out all the bags into one pile (even if you're only doing with the big pieces and leaving the small-piece bags separate) is psychotic. Imagine someone organizing your room for you into clearly labeled, convenient parts and then you just show up and mix everything randomly. I can understand having a messy room but I can't understand intentionally messing up a room.
Hot take: Lego needs to redo the battle droid (everything but the body) and make a new commando droid.
My biggest set I bought for a minifigure was Samurai X mech from Crystalized. I bought it only for Jay's minifig so I could have all four original Ninja in both the Dragon Form and with the gold armor on.
I think part of the fun, is that you can do whatever you feel fun with your Lego pieces, there are options for everybody, and it's better than ok, it's amazing
I really like how certain old set stuff looked. Faces, wheels, doors, etc, all of that was simpler in the whole "System" aesthetic and it had a very nice charm. The later ones were sort of close to it early on, but stuff like City just went away and never came back despite sharing themes. Creator is still cool though.
Personally, I open all the bags in sets but separate by colors. (Sometimes.)
The Great Wave was amazing... I listened to the accompanying audio interviews while building it, and this made for a special and unique experience!! 🥰
Now I just need to sell a kidney to get Rivendell, then build it while playing LotR in the background... 😅
i did the mixing bags thing when i was building the original tower bridge, it was cuz i had to move around a bit, and didnt want lug around smaller boxes.
I think most people who closely watch the various themes’ designs would agree, so not sure if it’s really a ‘hot take’…. The last few years, the Friends theme has had the best, most creative, leap forward in designs overall.
My hot take would be that it is a shame that Lego killed off their own themes/brands and replaced them with licenced ones. No Pirates, just Pirates of the Caribbean. No Space, just Star Wars. We had so many of those but now it is just license after license...
True
In the case of Pirates of the Caribbean, we actually had an unlicensed pirate theme after that. Problem was it was a half-assed theme with some neat ideas but awful execution. So it wasn't Pirates of the Caribbean that killed Pirates, it was 2015 Pirates that killed Pirates.
Also, the old original themes are making a sort of mini-comeback with various Icons sets. Have you seen the El Dorado Fortress remake?
Maybe not knees, but I could definitely see LEGO mini-figs in the future probably having articulating ankle pieces, so you can have slightly more dynamic walking poses, or more creative action poses like leaping from a high diving board with their toes pointed.
Maybe even make them interchangeable to some degree, so you could have a mini-fig with completely blue legs and a mini-fig with completely black legs, but you could swap the ankle pieces to make it look like one of the figures is wearing blue jeans with black shoes (or vice versa).
I feel SOO old when i remember when Lego used to do Minifigure packs for figures which were only in the more pricey sets or when they first brought in labelling bags.. Though the earlier bags with the better feeling plastic with the holes still feels Way better then the modern stuff.. I think the first set i brought which had .. mm. I'm not sure if they bags were numbered or just one of the first ones which had more then one bag, would be.. Hubble bubble's balloon ship.. can't remember what the set is called though..
No, minifigs would not at all need to be larger to have bendable knees. Mega blocks figures have always had knees as far as I'm aware and they're the same size and with far more realistic proportions. Adding a hinge in to them would be easy, especially with how blocks and simplistic their shapes are.
Something I find more necessary though personally is outwards joints at the shoulders.
OMG YES! i wasn't sure if my comment about mega bloks made any sense but now i see i'm not the only one thinking that!
could be the 32 year old in me but I cant get with Dreamzzz. Too wacky and chaotic
I'm 54 and it's the wackiness I love! I'm also a fan of Chima, Trolls, Monkie Kid.
I personally love the Lego Brickheadz sets and have a good amount built at my dads house in a glass shelf. They are cool. And you can make one that looks like yourself too.
I display a set for a few weeks or months, and then I break them down to each invidual piece. Currently all my sets are stored broken down in plastic shoeboxes that are labelled, think my biggest set is 3 shoeboxes. At some point I build them again, and I get to enjoy scratching for the right piece amongst the entire lot of pieces.
I think lego minifigures should have elbows and knees like mega blocks minifigures. They just look better and are more fun to pose.
My hot take is that Lego needs to ditch all its licensed properties, at least need to scale back the licensed sets to just one or two in each theme a year, and go back to original themes. They also need to scale back drastically on the total number of products, and also license their own brand to third party companies, especially in terms of electronics.
Lego would literally go bust if that were to happen. Do you not understand just how much money themes like Star Wars, Marvel, Harry Potter, Minecraft, etc. make for the Lego Company? Themes like those, plus some original themes like City and Ninjago, are what keep Lego in business, and if they were to suddenly drop them, the company would fail. I mean, I almost exclusively collect Star Wars sets, so if Lego stopped making those sets, then I'd stop collecting Lego.
@@CloneCommanderCrater1102 Which is a shame. Star Wars is exactly what killed Lego's original themes and creativify and also why the prices for all Lego products increased (due to the licensing agreement).
@@Eidolon1andOnly I mean technically if it were not for Lego Star Wars original themes would've been *entirely* dead, cause the company itself would've been entirely dead.
Anyway I don't see the innate wrongness of Lego sets that recreate different properties, although I'd agree they shouldn't be so hyperfocused on licensed properties as they have been in more recent years. I take a more moderate stance and think a balance should be struck (which I think is what we had broadly around the late 2000's/early 2010's mark, where aside from mainstays you had stuff like Atlantis, Power Miners, Castle, Space Police, Exo-Force) which is lacking right now.
@@incrediblyaverage7177 Technically that's false, since there are other ways the company could've saved itself like it did with Bionicle.
@@Eidolon1andOnly Don't get me wrong, I'm well aware of the great success of Bionicle, but Star Wars was nevertheless not a small part of keeping them afloat.
I didn't even know what the bag numbers meant when I was younger, dump in a pile was my way of life.
The part where you read that guy's comment about Legos tasting delicious brought back memories of one Christmas where one of my gifts was a box of edible Legos. They were made of a hard candy, similar in composition to that of Smarties, and actually functioned like regular Legos. They were even at the right scale that you could use them with regular Lego pieces. I never saw them again after that, and while I thought they were pretty cool, I can understand why Lego went "Now, wait a minute........Is this a good idea?!?!"
there should be military sets
I liked my own comment!
That’s crazy
Thats the most unoriginal comment ive ever seen.
I’ll dislike it to even it out
🖕
8:59 I think they were most likely referring to the ones that are basically just a bunch of 1 x 1 tiles on a baseplate like 31200
I like it when my sets have some kind of play feature (or atleast space for play) even if I will never use them.
I even make sure to have this in my own mocs.