Royal Marine Reacts To The Unbelievable Power of The B-2 Bomber

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 239

  • @gibster9624
    @gibster9624 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    There are 2 kinds of people. Those who use the metric system and those who have stealth bombers.

    • @Ekstrax
      @Ekstrax หลายเดือนก่อน

      it's ok, you still base your measurements on the official worldwide metric ones :D

    • @gibster9624
      @gibster9624 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @Ekstrax What is this Busch league comeback. I'll give you a chance to come up with something better. This is weak sauce. Really roast me.

  • @iKvetch558
    @iKvetch558 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    The B-21 will be flying missions just as long as the B-2...which often launch from the USA to deliver bombs to targets on other continents, and then land back in the USA with several aerial refuellings along the way.
    The carrying capacity of the B-21 Raider is reportedly going to be about half the load of the B-2 Spirit...the B-2 can carry about 40k pounds or more of bombs at once...it can carry 2 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs...while the B-21 is expected to be able to carry about 20k pounds of ordinance at one time...or one MOP. As I understand it, the B-21 will have a single bomb bay with one rotary launcher, whereas the B-2 had 2 bays each with a rotary launcher.

    • @ralts6464
      @ralts6464 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      B21 is like the drone version of the b2 lol

    • @Nick-sx6jm
      @Nick-sx6jm 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I really doubt that 40k is the actual payload considering the F15 is listed at 29.5k and B1 at 75k. Probably wont find out if its true or not until decades later when it becomes unclassified.

    • @iKvetch558
      @iKvetch558 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Nick-sx6jm With the B-2...and the upcoming B-21...the load is less about the actual weight, and much more about the space in the bay and on the rotary launcher. B-2 can carry 2 MOP bombs, so the heaviest load the B-2 is known to carry is 54,250 pounds, but that load requires the removal of the rotary launchers. For pretty much everything else, the limit is how much space their is on the launcher. B-2 carry 80 500lb bombs, which is a load of 40k pounds...so well below the B-2's actual maximum capacity.

    • @Appreciation-Community
      @Appreciation-Community 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I wonder if they can carry ADM-160 MALD and Cruise Missile combo.

    • @iKvetch558
      @iKvetch558 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Appreciation-Community Not according to currently available information...no, the B-2 has not been tested to carry the MALD. But since the MALD is not a "stealth" decoy, they generally would not even consider using it on the B-2. The other issue is that they generally do not use cruise missiles on the B-2 either, since it is designed to get in close and the cruise missiles are standoff weapons. In general, the Air Force puts cruise missiles on the B-52, and the B-1...but saves the B-2 for the missions it is best suited for.
      So in the case of a MALD/cruise missile combo, you would see that on the non-stealth planes, and the B-2 would be operating from another direction to take advantage of the defenders being distracted by the MALDs and missiles launched by the other bombers.

  • @willracer1jz
    @willracer1jz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    20:50 most of the combat operations the B-2 has been used on, originated in the US flown to the Middle East dropped its bombs and flew back to the US. Those missions usually lasted over 20 hours and help the crews train on their primary mission of dropping nuclear bombs over enemy territory.

  • @Thisisausername556
    @Thisisausername556 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    My dad was one of the lead engineers working on the F-22 and the F-35 when they were in development. He talked all the time about how annoying it was to work with classified documents lol.
    Now when I say “lead engineer” I mean he was either a higher up engineer or engineering manager for the parts he was responsible for since the plane’s parts designs were split between different teams across different bases and plants across all of Lockheed Martin and outside of it as well for other parts they weren’t fully responsible for.
    He has some cool stories but there’s still plenty of classified things he hasn’t told me about.

    • @jvillain9946
      @jvillain9946 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well my dad was the super lead engineer

  • @colbunkmust
    @colbunkmust 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Pretty much all radar cross-sections available to the public are only rough guesses and the actual numbers are a bit more complex. The actual radar cross-section depends on the angle you're directing the radar. In other words, there are probably angles where the B2 has a better or worse radar report than other stealth aircraft, but B2 is generally considered to be stealthier than the F-22 and F-35 fighters due to its lack of vertical stabilizers.
    Also, the longest mission in a B2 bomber was 44 hours, the longest bombing mission in history... so, no, maximum is definitely not 6-7 hours. They can refuel in air so as long as the pilots are alert and it has scheduled refueling it can fly indefinitely.

  • @BryanW-bp3le
    @BryanW-bp3le 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    The B-21 will have alot more of a focus on Electronic Warfare capabilities than the B-2 and be further data linked with new aircraft and other weapon systems.

  • @KenMcGeachy
    @KenMcGeachy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Watching B2's do some 'touch and go's' in Hawaii was a surreal treat. In profile your thinking what the heck is that, and then it banks off to one side, you see it's underside and it sends a shiver down your spine

  • @ActuallyJamie
    @ActuallyJamie 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    We call them rations as well but it's MRE (Meal Ready to Eat)

  • @TheNukedNacho
    @TheNukedNacho 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    13:00 i mean it makes sense to me. They're not going to have a personal gourmet chef on board. MREs are the most practical thing I can think of for having food on board

    • @stuchris
      @stuchris 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can say from experience that I'm that position I'd happily take the MREs too, they make em good.

  • @adamr2977
    @adamr2977 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I worked on this thing. I will always remember one of the "motivational posters" we had on the wall in the office. It was a picture of one of our aircraft flying over a desert with the words:
    "Plausible Deniablility:
    The only proof you'll ever have that we were there is a giant hole in the ground where something used to be"
    I genuinely loved that poster.

  • @Paul-sf5lv
    @Paul-sf5lv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    When they last went to the middle east (Houthis raid) they flew from Missouri USA ( which is where it's based), and I do believe the flight time was 31 hours. Just like our other large bombers they have long flight times, when they are used...usually. Remember the spot for the air mattress? I think the ONLY place they land is their home base as well, at least so far.

  • @prodigypenn
    @prodigypenn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I believe the B2 and the F22 have about the same size cross section, because fighters have to be maneuverable, so it is more difficult to make them stealthy, the B2 is not meant to make maneuvers, it relies on it's stealth to remain undetected

    • @jassom1270
      @jassom1270 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Very similar but the f22 is still a good bit smaller
      The b2 is also a way larger than the f22 so that’s part of it. The f22 is also newer.
      So between being smaller and newer it makes sense that it’s RCS is smaller than that of the b2

    • @alexw6107
      @alexw6107 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jassom1270This was my theory as well. I wasn’t sure about it being newer or older, but yeah it’s way larger than the f22

  • @CanisDirusPrime
    @CanisDirusPrime 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You forget about the aerial refueling ability. Most B-2 flights took off and landed in the US after dropping payloads in the Middle East.

  • @matsv201
    @matsv201 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One of the main gold with the B21 was to cut down on both pecurment cost and maintanace. The new stealth coating is speciallt made to be more durable so it should cut down the cost quite a bit.
    The newet plane is also quite a bit smaller and generaly more efficent. The concept was that its really not that often a full bombload is needed for a B2 so its often flow with half load. Making the B21 smaller just cuts cost.

  • @KennethMoore80
    @KennethMoore80 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One key thing about Radar cross section it's dependent on a whole bunch of things. The two big ones I'll focus on are aspect angle (Head on, from side, behind, etc) and radar wavelength. The F-22 and F-35 may have lower radar cross sections head on then the B-2, but once you start going to the side the story changes a lot! Also F-22/F-35 are more worried about shorter wave length targeting radars, the B-2 is more stealthy against a much wider range of wavelengths.

  • @VarriskKhanaar
    @VarriskKhanaar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    F-22 is smaller than the B-2, but yeah.. F-22 is the radar-equivalent size of a bee from the front.

    • @matsv201
      @matsv201 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The concept of the cross section is eqvivalent to a set size is kind of BS.
      For lower freqvency size is way smaller for the B2

  • @joshuawiedenbeck6944
    @joshuawiedenbeck6944 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    That 5,300lb bomb can penetrate the ground to a depth of 180' before exploding. 180' is insanely deep for any type of structure or bunker.

    • @RaccoonLex
      @RaccoonLex 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      180 inches? 4,5 meters,,
      Finland hold my beer!
      Helsinki bombshelter is 20-30 meters underground in the bedrock, overall the Helsinki shelters/shelter tunnel network is capable housing 900 000 ppl, while there is only 500 000 citizens in helsinki overall

    • @joshuawiedenbeck6944
      @joshuawiedenbeck6944 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @RaccoonLex ' denotes feet. " denotes inches. For everyone shitting on the US, that's roughly 60 meters.

    • @RaccoonLex
      @RaccoonLex 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@joshuawiedenbeck6944 didn't know that, 60 meters? that indeed is deep

    • @Badco1948
      @Badco1948 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@RaccoonLex The shock wave from the detonation will collapse structures much deeper than the depth of detonation. Supposedly the Iraqi Army gave up when a Command Bunker 600 feet deep was collapsed by a bunker buster. 600 feet = 182.9 meters.

  • @christophermaschek
    @christophermaschek 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The B2 usually does a fly over for the Kansas City Chiefs home opener.

  • @Austin_Wingfield
    @Austin_Wingfield 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wasn't in the military, nor have i flown planes. But i love these videos

  • @mostlyevilmisha
    @mostlyevilmisha 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Operations Room has some great vids where he talks about the long flight times of B-52s, B-2s and he's even got one on the F-111s bombing Libya. Look for the Desert Storm Air War, and the Afgan operations.

  • @jakecollier9691
    @jakecollier9691 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My great grandfather worked construction in the building that they were constructing the b2 in. He had to be sworn to secrecy and get a security clearance. He told me about the first time they saw it fly over them and said it was totally silent.

  • @timmooney7528
    @timmooney7528 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The food rations are MRE's - meals ready to eat.

    • @tpros6289
      @tpros6289 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Other places call it MRI Meal Ready Individual (as said on the front of the package). I even read them being called IMR Individual Military Ration.

    • @timmooney7528
      @timmooney7528 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@tpros6289 i heard them referred to as Meals Refuse by Everyone, and Meals Refused by Ethiopians.

    • @tpros6289
      @tpros6289 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@timmooney7528 Maggots Refuse Eating. Mom's Russian Eel meat.

  • @tj_2701
    @tj_2701 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Most B2 missions are around easily 18 hours or more. Remember they fly out of central U.S. to their target and back.

  • @eddawg79
    @eddawg79 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The B-2 and F-22 are both about the size of a bumble bee on radar if that helps, with the B-2 being bigger it's actually more stealthy. Also did he say he guesses it would only be airborne for about 6 hours, the longest mission one was on lasted 44 hours.

  • @fixman88
    @fixman88 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The B-2 is *literally* worth its weight in gold. No joke. One was wrecked in a landing accident, making it the world's most expensive airplane crash.

  • @breckohlson7410
    @breckohlson7410 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    True Story when I was in the USAF. My squadron was deployed for a few weeks to an air base 2 hours outside of Lindon. We arrived a day ahead of the B-52s that were flying in from our home base Barksdale AFB, LA
    We heard one of them in-bound had an inflight emergency. Once of the crew members had massive intestinal issues that developed over the pond. Apparently, he had massive diarrhea and lost it in his flight suit, all over the toilet and round it. Apparently he waited too long before getting to that toilet. The crew had to deal with the smell and the mess the whole rest of the flight. Haard team was deployed to the plane to clean it up...not sure if it was from an MRE or not, but from my experience, MRE would generally block you up, not the other way around. If it was an MRE, then the MRE stood for Men Ready to Explode. The poor crew member, the embarrassment and pain he had to deal with from that...he was later ok in the "end". Pun intended.

    • @Amomferatus
      @Amomferatus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Crew member at the stick "Oh Shit!" crew member on toilet "No Shit, Diarrhea! I dropped a big cluster bomb and I missed."

    • @Kevin-ti3rz
      @Kevin-ti3rz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I had that problem driving across the country . I would not let my friends drive . I was not trusting them to stop every 5 miles that I had to. It was a long trip

  • @Dave-lh6ws
    @Dave-lh6ws 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you look up the way commercial aircraft wings are tested they actually flex a shockingly large amount and need to be able to, so for the B2 to have a greater amount of flex tolerance is pretty impressive

  • @plotholedetective4166
    @plotholedetective4166 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    And yes the three og stealth planes are no longer considered very stealthy and each has been replaced by a newer versions. The black bird turned to the darkstar, the stealth fighter was always useless but is mostly replaced by the 22 Raptor and 35 lightning now and the spirit is being replaced by the 21 raider and possibly another that is still kept under the white sheet.

    • @nadjasunflower1387
      @nadjasunflower1387 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      stealth fighter...was a bomber and not a fighter...maybe why it was useless as a fighter. LOL

    • @FineWine-v4.0
      @FineWine-v4.0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Darkstar is not a thing, not yet

  • @briandix4633
    @briandix4633 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The B-21 is actually based on the original design for the B-2, if you look at the trailing edge. The B-2 has an extra pair of notches, so it has 2 trianles instead of the single one on the B-21. The tech didn't exist at the time to make it stable with the single point, but apparently it does now

  • @geraldperry3253
    @geraldperry3253 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i got to see one at whitening air force base Missouri even seen it take off and came back threw or it was another im not sure but the one that flew over i remember it sounding like rolling thunder it was something to see something ill never forget

  • @Cody38Super
    @Cody38Super 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The B2 has flown 14,000 miles for 30 hours round trip flying time!

  • @timmooney7528
    @timmooney7528 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    When you have time, check out the movie Strategic Air Command, starring Brigadier General James Stewart. It's a 1950's film and the crew transitions from a B-36 to a B-47. This is a pre-requisite
    before watching the promotional film, Champion of Champions featuring Jimmy Stewart flying the B-58 Hustler. The B-58 was Mach 2 capable.

  • @Dan-k3b
    @Dan-k3b 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I didn't see the mead bottles behind you so I said, "He must have hit 500k"... Congrats!

  • @odorousobject8165
    @odorousobject8165 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congrats on passing 500k subs!!!

  • @moistchurro
    @moistchurro 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    remember, MRE's here in the US use to have matches and a cigarette in them, not anymore though

  • @TobyBarrows
    @TobyBarrows 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love the video! Can I recommend the video Battle of Mirbat (9 SAS Soldiers VS 300 Adoo Guerrillas) by Simple History. The battle is one of the most important by the SAS and Taka deserves the Victoria Cross and was supposedly refused as the British weren't there 'officially' I enjoyed the video keep it up!

  • @jamescharles1588
    @jamescharles1588 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The B2 is a larger aircraft so it’s going to have a larger cross section than the F-22. Stealth doesn’t mean invisible. Stealth helps negate weapons lock on the aircraft.

  • @hipguide1
    @hipguide1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The B-52 has a 26' flex on the wings!

  • @odorousobject8165
    @odorousobject8165 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The B-21 is definitely cheaper, much like the F35 is cheaper than the F22 since both the B-21 and the F-35 took elements from their previous generations and improved on them instead of totally designing something from scratch. They already had stealth down, just needed to improve it along with engines, materials science, electronic signals intelligence gathering and communication. So maybe a few hundred million cheaper per unit.

  • @Dave-lh6ws
    @Dave-lh6ws 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A large reason why the B2 is so expensive is the air force didn't order enough for dedicated factories to be built for it so each one was effectively built by hand. They ordered just enough to be as expensive as possible

    • @nadjasunflower1387
      @nadjasunflower1387 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the other reason...is because the B2 was originally supposed to be the size of the B21...however Air Force genrals got involved with the design process...and started adding their wishlists to what the plane was supposed to do over the original spec...like low level flight etc. etc. that also added time and costs to the planes developement...the B21 is " the plane we should have had the first time " kinda design, just updated.

  • @Kevin-ti3rz
    @Kevin-ti3rz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The one that took off at Nellis AFB when I was working there was the loudest plane I ever heard besides the Concord.

  • @RINO711
    @RINO711 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You know what else is amazing? The ammo troops that set those munitions out there for that shot

  • @TheGelatinousSnake
    @TheGelatinousSnake 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Vulnerable to hostile air craft in visual range. Fly at night to mitigate.
    Sophisticated Air Defenses may be able to track and target it… shame if Electronic Warfare Craft and Anti-Radiation missiles show up and un-sophisticate the situation 😂
    Combined Capabilities are all about systematically dismantling the adversary’s capabilities. Even if an adversary in theory is capable of tracking and targeting stealth craft, expect those capabilities to be degraded by the time the bombers arrive

  • @thor-cj9dh
    @thor-cj9dh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember when this was revealed 89. An analyst said it was literally worth its weight in gold.

  • @Apogy46
    @Apogy46 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I recommend taking a look at the YF-23 and its history in the ATF program. It was the competitor to the F-22. Seeing the differences in design philosophy and choices between the two is interesting. Especially since the winner would end up setting the path for the next generation of stealth aircraft.

    • @nadjasunflower1387
      @nadjasunflower1387 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      annnd...the 23 was better, faster....but not proposed by Lockheed...so yeah.
      Seen a thing a couple years ago on how the Japanese was trying to buy the plans for the YF-23 for their JDF as China was starting to get beligerant back then.
      I mean. " sell us the one your not using and that there's no laws forbidding you from selling to us. " lol

    • @briandix4633
      @briandix4633 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yup, the YF-23 was physically better in just about every area, if only by fractions of a percent, but the US government was concerned based on past experience that Northrup wouldn't be able to meet the demand without significant delays and cost overruns. So Lockheed won the contract, then suffered from those exact issues lol

  • @George-ux6zz
    @George-ux6zz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know the skin is honey combed. Radar goes through the skin into the honey comb portion and bounces around inside the honey comb until it dissipates.

  • @thatozarklife
    @thatozarklife 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love the content, brother!!

  • @SansaStarkw
    @SansaStarkw 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just want to point out we had 20 B-2 spirit but now we have 19
    According to a report on the US “Warzone” website on May 10, due to the complexity and excessive cost of maintenance work, the US Air Force decided to abandon the maintenance of a B-2 strategic bomber that had an accident before and take it out of active service. According to the “Warzone” website, the US Air Force's decision means that the US military will have only 19 valuable B-2 strategic bombers left. Currently, the US Air Force is promoting the deployment of B-21 strategic bombers to replace B-2 and B-1B strategic bombers.

  • @johnkelly6187
    @johnkelly6187 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The way you were laughing about taking a shit, tells me you are a Marine brother 😂👍🇺🇸🫡

  • @vampiro4236
    @vampiro4236 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No worries with the toilet. Those MRE's are sure to plug up your... emm, self. 😆
    And there have been some crazy long missions for the B-2. They had one that was 44 hours from start to finish.

  • @tj_2701
    @tj_2701 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The B2 and F22 have a similar RCS at a specific head-on angle. However the B2 has a smaller RCS "all around" meaning from different angles and sides even when flying away from the radar. The F22 does have a smaller RCS compared to the F35. And the F35 has a smaller RCS compared to the F117. And the F117 has a smaller RCS compared to the Russian SU57. And the newest U.S. Variant of the F16 has a similar RCS to the SU57. The SU57 is only considered "stealth because it's stealthier than other Russian planes. China's J20 is considered to be a more dangerous adversary. And finally it is likely that the B21 will be harder to detect than the B2, and it will be cheaper and easier for the maintenance and storage of that stealth capability.

  • @willracer1jz
    @willracer1jz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    9:25 Don't know how old this video is or how much research they did on the B-1 but there's been two crashes in the last ten years so not all B-2 are still operational.

    • @nadjasunflower1387
      @nadjasunflower1387 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I mean...I'm assuming that's a type-o...but the B 1 is a different plane than the B2....sooo 😁

    • @willracer1jz
      @willracer1jz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @nadjasunflower1387 lol good catch

  • @nickthompson6710
    @nickthompson6710 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HEY NOW, MRE'S are not bad! unless you demand to be spoon fed French cuisine from your baby momma

  • @ActuallyJamie
    @ActuallyJamie 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There's a joke/funny moment in the planes that have toilets like the B2. The crew would hold it in as long as possible because the first one that uses it is the one that has to dispose of it after they land.

  • @wadestclair249
    @wadestclair249 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The B-2 Spirit stealth bomber holds the record for the longest air combat mission in history, lasting 44 hours and 20 minutes:
    Mission
    In 2001, the Spirit of America and five other B-2s flew a record-breaking mission in support of Operation Enduring Freedom.
    Details
    The B-2s penetrated Afghan airspace, dropped bombs, and then refueled. The crew was asked to return to Afghanistan to use their remaining bombs, and they spent an additional 90 minutes over the country. They then refueled again and headed to Diego Garcia, where they landed after 44 hours and 20 minutes in the air.

  • @wilomica
    @wilomica 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So to spot a B-2 just look for something the size of a song bird moving at nearly the speed of sound! It's unlikely to be a really quick pigeon.

  • @fromashes7818
    @fromashes7818 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    35 years old and most countries don't even come close to matching it. Just imagine what the gen 6's are gonna be like

  • @SamGray
    @SamGray 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's not Just a set of wings... it's a set of wings with a bomb bay.

    • @adamr2977
      @adamr2977 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not a set of wings, just one. It's *a* wing with a bomb bay.

  • @kennethhicks2113
    @kennethhicks2113 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Radar return... stealth, damn hard to detect when flown tactically correct.

  • @Cryptic141
    @Cryptic141 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I think the f22's radar cross section is the size of a bumblebee same with the f35? not sure tho 😂

    • @RussetPotato
      @RussetPotato 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is a reason to have made the replacement for this one. It's a mosquito on the same scale

  • @chetlake3204
    @chetlake3204 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The 21 raider is roughly half the size of the B2. Carries half the payload, but also has the capability of being a manned flight or un-manned. Currently, there are 100 in production at the low-low cost of just $636,000,000. A steal at twice the price! Considering the B2 cost a little over $2B each, when Northrop Grumman came in at $636M, the government was jumping up and down with excitement and said, "we'll take a hundo". Haha😅😅😅😅😅

  • @KairoValen
    @KairoValen 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    17:00 sounds like a regular day in the office lol

  • @mrjackpots1326
    @mrjackpots1326 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's too bad the video didn't have any footage of the bomber in action. It's terrifying. It can drop sixteen 2000 pound JDAMs all at once with each bomb targeted on a different objective. It was used during the final Iraq War, but really by that time there wasn't much left worth all that firepower. This bomber was meant to replace the B-52 because it has a similar bomb load and range, but is almost invisible to radar. It's radar cross section is bigger than the F-22 because the aircraft itself is simply bigger. The B-2 was designed for one primary mission, the destruction of major military powers, namely Russia and China. They are terrified of this aircraft and their stealth technology is decades behind the US and what they do have was acquired, as usual, through espionage.

  • @therealaustink
    @therealaustink หลายเดือนก่อน

    That info is incorrect. The B-2 has a bed a microwave and a lavatory, and the 2 pilots take turns resting and eating bc they can be in the air for literal days

  • @TerryDrap
    @TerryDrap 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A YF-22 video would be very cool to see you react to and as always great reaction to the B2 Spirit

  • @jkuzem96
    @jkuzem96 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Someone may have already answered this, but the B-2 has a bigger RCS than the raptor because it's bigger, not necessarily because the raptor has better stealth

  • @eman7892
    @eman7892 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Radar return Size of a bumble bee

  • @robrr2000
    @robrr2000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It refuels in flight.. it stays in the air until its payload has been delivered. Not sooner. Toilets and food are important.

  • @Bluelagoonstudios
    @Bluelagoonstudios 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think we had a different training, my job was to see everything, because we were reccon fuseliers, we worked very closely with our special forces, para troopers, they also trained us. Because we were so close. Did 5 years active duty, and 5 years reserves. After Rwanda in 1991 I was broken, too intense while hutu did genocide on the tutsi tribe. So went into the reserves, with a big chunk of ptsd. Been treated only in the 2000s and my wife pulled me through. The B2 is a marvelous technical wonder, but very expensive and a lot of maintenance. They say the B21 will be cheaper on maintenance.

  • @jonathanwoods7776
    @jonathanwoods7776 หลายเดือนก่อน

    B2 bombers flew round trip from U.S. to Iraq &back during the Gulf War, totaling 33 hours of flight!

  • @DJ-ys9pv
    @DJ-ys9pv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    16 Nukes sounds INSANE

  • @stalnox
    @stalnox 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The F-22’s rcs size is 0.0001 sqm. And the F-35’s is 0.0015 sqm. The 35’s is the size of a golf ball, and the 22’s is just tiny.

  • @jrisomfoobar
    @jrisomfoobar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The F22 and F35 have different combat roles and sacrifice stealth for maneuverability. The stealth bombers are meant to bomb while undetected.

    • @jrisomfoobar
      @jrisomfoobar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also the bombers refuel in air. I don't think they're stationed outside the US.

  • @_Sporkz_
    @_Sporkz_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have you seen about the Rapid Dragon pallet cruise missles that can have 45 of them dropped out of a C17 by Fat Electrician? I think it is interesting information about a tech the USAF has that you might not have seen

  • @Santoroz
    @Santoroz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Meal Ready to Eat = MRE 😆

  • @jmtpolitico80
    @jmtpolitico80 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Basically with the B-2 and the B-21 Fly by Computers. So the Pilot is only needed to Land and Takeoff!

  • @WlliamLiles
    @WlliamLiles 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    At ease gents it’s Original Human time 🫡🇺🇸🇬🇧

  • @seasonallyferal1439
    @seasonallyferal1439 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Talk to Ryan Macbeth about the "military industrial complex "

  • @Sirburus
    @Sirburus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    fighters make movies, bombers make history

  • @Adiscretefirm
    @Adiscretefirm 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Record B2 mission was 44 hours, US to Afghanistan

  • @George-ux6zz
    @George-ux6zz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MRE= Meals Ready to Eat.

  • @halhortonsworld5870
    @halhortonsworld5870 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "slips under the radar" 😁😅🤣😂

  • @Moros666420
    @Moros666420 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    There are countries that use the metric system and countries that have B-2 Stealth bombers.

  • @marine6680
    @marine6680 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    At 0.1m^2 that is a rectangle of 25*40cm which is 1000cm^2, while the F22 is more like 4cm^2 but you need to remember that the B2 is much larger than the F22...
    It is an older design, so it's stealth isn't quite as good, but it is also down to the size difference as to why the B2 has a larger radar cross section.
    Plus there are techniques available to the pilots to help limit the ability of radar to see the plane.
    Plus keep in mind that radar cross section is dependent on the relative position/orientation of the aircraft to the radar system. It will change based on that. The F22 likely has a larger cross section than the B2 in some orientations.

  • @lemikaelz4861
    @lemikaelz4861 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Grumman also makes all of our us mail trucks

  • @SoulSl0th
    @SoulSl0th 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Longest flight recorded was 47 hours

  • @m2hmghb
    @m2hmghb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We used to call them meals rejected by Ethiopians back in the 90s. That was changed to be more politically correct so it's just meals rejected by everyone.

  • @AncestorEmpire1
    @AncestorEmpire1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Guam:
    The power of crashing on take off

  • @CanisDirusPrime
    @CanisDirusPrime 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yup! Oreo's, Skittles, Milky Way bars, Chocolate Chip Cookies, and a Chiclets gum among many other goodies.

  • @michaelgeorge-oj7mn
    @michaelgeorge-oj7mn 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The new B-21 raider stealth is about 3 times cheaper and 2-3 times more effective than the B-2 and requires only a fraction of the maintenance.
    Much lower operating costs and better performance are benefits of investing in a new iteration of an existing design and will become very apparent.

  • @plotholedetective4166
    @plotholedetective4166 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My uncle worked on the development of the spirit and a bunch of other planes like the c-17 globemaster(the flying clusterfuck)

    • @Montweezy
      @Montweezy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      One of my close friends growing up was a C-130 pilot at Hickum AF base out of Hawaii. Retired this past year after 30 years in Air Force.

  • @davidkeese3372
    @davidkeese3372 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just remember this is the declassified information we are allowed to know about. 😳😅

  • @DanielRichards644
    @DanielRichards644 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    MRE's- Meals Ready to Eat.

  • @billnickerson2006
    @billnickerson2006 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My assumption would be the reduction in size is probably directly proportional, cost to payload delivery. Probably takes significantly less fuel while maintaining similar payload.

  • @jmtpolitico80
    @jmtpolitico80 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The American (MREs) are actually not too bad, depending on what you have. But the majority are pretty good!

  • @raz4371
    @raz4371 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    f22 and f35 have a RCS of 0.0001m^2 which is much smaller than b2

  • @richardables6561
    @richardables6561 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My friend you have never had an american MRE if you think shitting afterwards is your biggest concern. The problem with american MRE is that after eating one you wont shit for 2 days. Haha

  • @wendykeesey8494
    @wendykeesey8494 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MRE. MEALS READY TO EAT.

  • @chetlake3204
    @chetlake3204 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Meals Ready to Eat !

  • @jassom1270
    @jassom1270 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    B2 has more capacity
    B21 has more range
    In recent years b2s haven’t been using its full load capacity and has often been fitted with extra fuel tanks, hence why the b21 is focused more on having a longer range with less payload