Hearing that the captain of the Belgrano and other naval officers actually defended Britain’s actions and saying they would’ve done the same is very admirable of them. I had no idea that they did that
The Argentine Navy, has apparently always viewed the sinking of the ARA General Belgrano as a legitimate act of war. It's usually been the Argentine government that have tried to claim it was a warcrime
Elements of the British Left never could accept the UK's right to defend itself, and set in chain a smear campaign. A head of the Argentine Navy said that to say that the sailors were murdered was an insult to their memory as sailors who died in battle, in a letter to La Nacion.
Quite simply the best documentary I have seen on the Falklands War. Excellent graphics, and use of contemporary archive materials. Very impressive piece.
I have to second that comment. This is the best and most comprehensive documentary I have ever watched. It must have taken you weeks to put together. Fantastic.
Agreed. I clicked on it by accident but stuck till the end. Just listening to the account of PTSD off Falkland vets while recalling a girl I knew who lived in a homeless hostel with a Falklands vet. Most in there were on hard drugs and nursing different forms of trauma. One reason I would be reluctant to go to war would be PTSD.......I probably have it already....... death would be better than enduring a life like that. Some people can never go back to civilian life for other reasons. Boredom or whatever
Argentine here. Thanks for making this exceptional documentary. 100% Respect to Great Britain and RIP to all lost on both sides. Hopefully all their lives paid for the possibility to resolve future disputes by non violent means. 🇬🇧❤🇦🇷
@@rickyphillips7630 Agreed. It's difficult to move on when politicians use it as an emotional button they can just push whenever they need popularity, but eventually younger generations are going to care less and less about rehashing pointless disputes of the past and more about actual relevant issues.
You are shame of your ancestors, British occupy your land and you think that in some time you will solve it peacefully. There is no possibility to solve anything peacefully with the West
As an ex Royal Marine Commando I have watched many Falklands documentary’s over the years. This by far is the best with so many bits of information I was not aware of. It fills me with pride to watch this knowing what my country and everyone who had taken part in help accomplish. May all who fell Rest In Peace. 🇬🇧
I hope you include the young Argentinian conscripts when you praise all that fell. I hope you include all of the merchant seaman serving on RFA ships who were refused the option they had been promised to leave at Ascension Island in your prayers. I was on RFA Resource, a ship full of weapons (including nuclear) who were provided with almost no cover from the British military, as our own dictator had systematically dismantled the need for military defence. As a young Scotsman I had seen everything we stood for cruelly torn from us by that evil piece of crap. Men who were proud to work in the pits, to provide coal to the steel workers who made steel to build ships, who made the ships to provide work for the dockers. I am sad for everyone that lost their life or were injured in a war that was manufactured between Thatcher and Galtieri to save their political careers, I am still haunted by the bombs dropped around me in San Carlos Bay. I take no joy in our victory.
@@superstardeejay2468 it’s unfortunate that even today some don’t even allow you to be patriotic and proud which is probably why you replied to me instead of leaving it a main comment. When I say “all” I mean ALL. We obviously have different views on this but as a veteran of two lengthy frontline deployments to Afghan and Iraq by my government I don’t whine about it, I did what was expected so please don’t preach to me about bombs. I am not here to argue but leave my respects and to commend this video.
A series of CIA aerial photography analyses showed the level of detail of U.S. surveillance of Argentine forces on the ground: "Vessels present include the 25 de Mayo aircraft carrier with no aircraft on the flight-deck," reads one; "at the airfield [redacted] were parked in the maintenance area [....] 707 is on a parking apron with its side cargo door open," reads another. reading the declassified stuff about secret US support .
Thank you for producing this doco. In 1982 at the age of 14, I was in southern Argentina with my father (a glaciologist), as part of a glaciology conference. The war broke out just as we arrived in the southern town of Rio Gallegos, after our tour of Patagonia. As two New Zealanders, we were the only Commonwealth members of the trip and became very anxious about being detained in Argentina. In fact, our scheduled flight back to Buenos Aires, on an Aerolineas Argentinas Boeing 727 was cancelled as the plane was commandeered to fly Argentine Army personnel to the 'Islas Malvinas', as we got to know them. Things got worse as the NZ government cancelled all flights between Argentina and Auckland, NZ. Diplomatic communications between the NZ embassy and the Argentinian authorities saw us fly to BA and then onto Los Angeles (on an Aerolineas Argentinas plane!). Seeing our Air New Zealand Boeing 747 in LA was quite an experience. I still have a good deal of Argentinian war-related material from the episode, it seems quite historic now - at the age of 56 !
@@jonahlittle-bw5oo 1) What a nuanced response. 2). And yet you still read the piece. 3) So tell us your interesting story from that event, it must be RIIIVITING !
I was there as a nineteen year old Royal Marine in Four Five Commando. I was st Two Sisters and was watching Longdon thinking 'that looks rough' - apparently the Para's were looking at Two Sisters thinking the same. My OC received the MC & my Section Commander the MM for that night's work. As for me - I was simply pleased to come home. I'm now in regular contact with an Argentine mortar-man who was at Two Sisters: after trying to kill each other we're now friends. I'm also friends with the son of an Argentine KIA fighter pilot who is coming over this summer, 2024, to stay a few days at my home. Interesting times and a great, well researched story which I listened to as I pottered about. Well Done!
As Argentinian, it is the most complete and mainly Neutral documentary that I have seen, showing a lot of respect to both parties. Unnecessary war, between a country (Argentina) historically not warlike (politically and culturally) whose politicians were looking for a distraction to hide their terrible national policies, against a militarily overwhelming country like Great Britain. Both fighting with bravery and honor. Perhaps for the British it does not represent such an important war in terms of forces and casualties, taking into account its long military history, but for us and our limited war history it was. May the perished rest in peace, and may it serve to remember the consequences of unnecessary wars.
If I can comment on Belgrano. Obviously it represents a defeat and a disgrace for my compatriots. But if analyzed neutrally, we were an aggressor country and another that defended itself. A couple of miles from the exclusion zone doesn't change anything. Both parties would have done the same.
Why are you sugar coating the British in your comment? The Malvinas Islas are Argentinian. The Brits never had any rights to them. Just like many parts of the world, they stole the lands from the people, and here you are giving them credit. Come on!
One thing that's often overlooked, on both sides, is the mental toll of the war on those who fought it. I can't remember his name, but there was a British gunner on one of the taskforce ships who shot down one of the Argentine fighters and he was haunted by the image of the plane catching on fire after being hit and was certain when he saw the crash site that there was no way the pilot had survived. But, unbeknownst to him, the pilot, Mariano Velasco, ejected before impact and survived. In 2012, just before the 30th anniversary of the conflict, as part of a project through the BBC programme "Inside Out Yorkshire," he was taken to Velasco's house in Argentina and in a tearjerking moment, these two men from different sides, warmly embraced one another
I was an Australian civilian working for the New Zealand Defence Dept. during the conflict. I saw information and was happy to note it published in full within days to the public. Both good and bad news, which inspired great confidence in the news media. A time I will never forget.
@@realtruth4804 nono we get real time information of war zones now. just take a look at ukraine we know everything that happened at every second of the war... why? social media
That is literally the most brilliantly illustrated video of the Falklands War I have ever seen. You really do deserve the praise you get for this. I couldn't be any more impressed than I am. If I were to pick the best video I have seen in the last ten years, this one would take the prize. Thank you.
Just incredible. I’ve watched all these videos separately, but clicked on the video anyways. It’s just impossible to click away. You did a fantastic job as always.
My father was in the Welsh Guard that was sent to the Falklands. He filmed almost everything there to the point his original film and and diaries of his time there was pretty much given its own section in the British Military Museum’s Falkland exhibition that they are creating. I don’t know if the channel owner looks at comments but if you would like I can send you a copy
What a fantastic video, very well written and informative. The only thing that would of been worth a mentioning was the Vulcan bombing mission against the port stanley airfield. The amount of tankers and air to air refueling to get that far was just insane. Loved the video and love the channel!
Tankers refuelling tankers was just insane on it's own. I've seen a documentary on the whole flight plan and the refuelling requirements and only the RAF could have come up with it!
The Blackbuck Vulcan raid was militarily insignificant and the filmmaker was probably right to quickly brush over it without going into detail about the huge effort behind the scenes that went into the mission.
Argentina on the sinking of the Belgrano, "A treacherous act of armed aggression" from the country that hadn't declared war but invaded the Falkland islands and blew up a barracks in Stanley where they beleived nearly 100 marines were stationed and were asleep...
Argentina's ruling junta of the time were treacherous scumbags, but as both the video and other posters have pointed out, the Belgrano's captain and Argentina's military in general conducted themselves honorably even when their rulers were pushing for worse...
Wow! Over the years I've watched many histories of the Falkland Islands War. And I lived through it. Most histories have focused, mainly, on the land war with lots of details and footage of the landing at Goose Harbor through victory at Stanley. This provides hiorical context, and all the happenings before the British attack/s. Nice! Best production I've seen. Ever. Thanks.
That was one of the best and most comprehensive accounts of the Falkland’s war I have ever seen. RIP all the brave men on both sides who lost their lives - what a tragedy.
The attention to detail is akin to an autopsy of this war and I’m not kidding I found this mesmerising Huge congratulations to the team that made this …. It’s quite simply breathtaking and I don’t say that lightly
This is an absolutely brilliant program. You can't overstate how large the Falklands conflict loomed over everyone. There was a real fear here in America as well as elsewhere that the war cold result in a power shift that would send Argentina into alleginment with the Soviets and broaden the USSR's influence. Of course that didn't happen but there was no way to know this at the time. An excellent documentary of a major historical event.
Argentina would never ever alingn with communists, at that time actually our military forces were working closely with USA to fight communist guerrilla in Argentina.
Our government in Argentina is and was deeply anticommunist. It had never aligned with the Soviet Union while the United States allowed them to conquer and enslave half of Europe.
It"s interesting to see that Thatchers decision wasn't so cut and dried from a start and there was lot of hesitation. From other documentaries you get a feeling like as she was sending ships the moment the Argentinians started barely thinking about invading Falklands.
I think something that is underplayed a lot is just what a colossal political risk Thatcher was taking in sending the task force. If it had been a disaster (which it easily could have been), it would have brought her government down
The mad cow had been told a year before that this was Argentinian plan by the Chilian. She did nothing except order the scrapping of HMS Ark Royal, the sale of HMS Invincible to the Australians and the sale of a LSD to Argentina which fell through. She then ordered the scrapping of the Ice Class Patrol ship HMS Endurance!
@@historigraphHi. I'm Chilean. Good content. About Thatcher, she was forced by the circumstances: 1) If she didn't do anything, she was a political cadaver walking. 2) If she sent the Task Force, it could or could not end in disaster. There is a better prospect of political survival with number 2) if you think it very rationally. But in the moment, the tension, fear and shock can cloud our own judgement.
@@historigraph I'm sure her office also had to take into account how this would play out on the world stage remember this was during the Cold War and Argentina was a communist run country. The Cuban missile crisis was still fresh in people's minds, the few near launch threats on both sides, and the Soviets we're eerily quiet through all of this. This was a very dangerous global chess board.
Excellent documentary. I was in the Falklands/Malvinas for the first time in December this year. Your research and delivery is just fantastic. The animations are super smooth and insightful.
It’s called the FALKLANDS, you don’t include irrelevant outdated translations of any other country alongside their REAL name, do you? So why do you feel the need to disrespect the brave fighters for Falkland freedom? Don’t be scared of seething argies and anti western Russian bots
Thoroughly enjoyable! Also significant was the support of Chilean gorvernment of moving some of their troops to the border, forcing Argentina to keep strong army groups home, as a precaution.
2 or so years prior, Argentina was posturing to go to war with Chile for some islands in the patagonia, so...not so strange that Chile sided with the british in this conflict.
Ah I didn't realize that. I was wondering why the Argentine garrison on the Falklands seemed so small. I would have fortified that place like nobody's business to make Britain really have to work for taking the islands back. But if there was a feisty Chile in the picture... makes sense!
@@Eggnog18 as an Argentine I can tell you that our army back in the 80s, and even nowadays, is small, unprepared and unexperienced. Our government, for some weird reason, thought that since the world and the UK were going through bad economic and political times we would have the upper hand. Politics aside, and whether you think the islands are british or argentine, I think we can all agree our government was delusional and we never stood a chance against a first world powerhouse like the UK army.
Your documentary about this concise war was exceptional, a superb incorporation of graphics and historical footage. I thoroughly appreciated this summary.
This was a great documentary, I greatly enjoyed it. I was in the Falklands working for the British Antarctic Survey 5 years after the war and decided one day to walk 40km from Port Stanley to the top of Mount Kent and back. I almost walked through an uncleared Argentinian minefield on the return! The captain wasn't very happy with me because I was late back to the RRS John Biscoe.
The British Major screwed up. His trying to cover all the beaches around the airport meant he didn't have enough forces to defend anywhere effectively. That's a mistake a butter bar would do and a Major's should know better. It was REALLY DUMB! P.S. Being on the defensive you're expected to defeat a force three times your size since you get to set up the kill boxes, mine fields etc. and do it from cover.
@@readhistory2023 he defended against the (correct) assumed landing ground, while not committing war crimes like setting land mines. It was a bold but effective move by the Argentinians to go after political buildings but it worked. I don't see your solution working (legally, and) better than his. There's only so much you can do with a few dozen troops
In New York I watched this intently on TV every day at the time. Everyone I knew was rooting for the Brits. Still, this documentary filled in so much information that was omitted from typical TV sources...great job! Best part: Democracy won in both countries!
And boy look how entertaining that democracy has been 😂, Boris the bumbling idiot, rishi sunak, Liz truss's nightmare, former pm on the cabinet as a lord, and Javier milei as Argentinas president!
I like the short and snappy style of your normal videos. It allows precise access to anything I feel like watching and is very accessible before sleeping. That being said, if anyone deserves to and has the capacity to make documentaries of this size- which still is quite short honestly- it would be you. I hope you continue the longer documentaries and hope you are still enjoying this project.
@@1TruNub even the captain of the belgrano said that sinking the Belgrano was the right thing to do in that context. Thats why i think he should call down. Is the way war is imo
Excellent work. Although I lived through the conflict, and saw it on the news every day in my lower 6th year, I've never seen it in one go before. It makes a lot more sense to me now and I really appreciate the effort that went into making this complete analysis. Thank you.
Apparently Australia offered the Brits that Australian navy was ready to come to the fight too, and were told that their help was not required. Australians must LOVE warfare, they seem to have been in every war they can.
Well especially when Her Majesty's subjects are threatened. We've always got your backs mate. But I think the Kiwi's sent HMNZS Canterbury to the Indian Ocean to relive a Royal Navy ship so the Poms could have more ships ready for the war. Those sheep shaggers are a dependable lot.
Some year's later when former NZ PM Robert Muldoon was on a British Airways flight the pilot announced that he was on board. Most of the passengers stood up and gave him a standing ovation.@@davids5566
I actually was never taught this nor did I ever go out of my way to learn about it until this video. Good work. I was rooting for the Brits the entire time. Glad I wasn't let down.
Thank you so much for this video. I can honestly say that this is THE best documentary on the Falkland's War I have yet seen. You gave a perfect balance of tactics, with history, with inserts of relevant footage of the time and war. I did not get distracted from your video once; it was that engaging. During the entire video I had the Falkland Islands called up on Google earth and I was looking at the terrain, distances and the topography of the scene as you described it. Again, thank you so much.
i still find it amazing that The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland actually pulled this off to send troops and ships within days with all the logistics involved, the food, drink. ammo, aircraft. change of clothing, medical supplies and staff..then go 8,000 miles to fight a war against odds and win. amazing
You cannot 'recapture' something that was never yours in the first place. The Falklands were only ever owned in the beginning by the British, and the French on one of the islands at one point, and the Spanish briefly. Argentina was not even a sovereign nation when Great Britain first landed on the deserted Islands.
I don't see a problem with the sinking of Belgrano, firstly due to what the commanding officer of Belgrano said afterward. But I also have my pointers: 1. her group had 16 ASuW missile available 2. Then there is Belgrano her self. if they fired 16 missiles, and while the British task group was busy defending and or rescuing sailors, etc. Belgrano could just have steamed in and open fire with here 5 triple 6 in guns, thats 15 guns, and no british ship in that group would stand a chance against that.
Or, just look at it this way…in a war, the Belgrano was an enemy ship. It was in the vicinity of the Falklands for one reason only, and that wasn’t sight-seeing. As for the exclusion zone, the British government said any Argentine ships within it would be sunk. At no point did they say they wouldn’t sink enemy ships outside of it.
I will NEVER understand the uproar over the Belgrano. It was a naval vessel in the service of a nation at war. Submarines are SUPPOSED to sink enemy naval vessels wherever and whenever they find them. All this "it was treacherous aggression" and "outside the area" and "sailing away" is completely irrelevant. The ONLY thing that should be able to save a naval vessel from destruction during war is if its a hospital ship...or surrendering. Anything else should not be a surprise to anyone.
@manos-mf7uj it would be like the Japanese lodging a formal complaint that the US sunk their carriers at Midway as they were sailing away from the island...
@lecooldude it wasn't just the Argentinians that got butthurt about it though, it became this big international incident for some weird reason and Britain took a shitload of flak for it, like it was some kind of warcrime.
One of the men who rescued those SAS Soldiers stuck on the Glacier was Chris Parry, and I highly recommend anyone interested in the topics to listen to one of his talks on his experience during the War. Very insightful and hilarious at times.
Ariges forgot one of the Four Rules of War. 1. Never get into a land war in Asia 2. You can never hold Afghanistan 3. Never invade Russia in the winter. 4. Never get in to Naval warfare with the British!
Those scrap metal workers certainly gave us an advantage by bringing the conflict forward. Had the AAF got its full complement of Etendards and Exocet the task force would have had a very difficult task. Thank you for posting 😊
I can't imagine trying to take islands from a country that could level Buenos Aires. They must have really thought the UK would back down. But it shows you the kind of carnage that tin-pot dictators can bring to the very people they're ostensibly protecting.
The UK was going through its own political and economic troubles at the time. While it is ages-old wisdom that the best time to plunder a foe's homestead is while it is burning, you need to be careful that you do not become trapped inside it.
Britain left the islands in 1774, never protesting or challenging the 32 Spanish and 5 Argentine governors, any claim prescribed by acquiescence after 55 years of complete silence. They had absolutely no right to take them from Argentina that was already settled in 1833
1:21 - Your map is wrong... At the time, there was no Argentina, only the United Provinces of the Río de la Plata (later the Argentine federation before becoming the Republic of Argentina as we know it today) and the boarders of the United provinces were somewhat different to what is shown on your map. Crucially, Patagonia was its own independent territory, meaning the Falklands were a good 1700 km (>1000 miles) from the closest part of the United Provinces of the Río de la Plata. Only later would the Argininians colonise Patagonia, eventually launching a military conquest (the Conquest of the Desert) in 1870s-80s where Patagonia was formally captured and incorporated into the Argentine Republic. The notion that "its near us so should belong to us" is a revisionist argument... Unless invading, colonising and subdugating other territories (eg Patagonia) and thereby moving your border closer is now a legitimate form of claim...?
1806: First British invasion of Buenos Aires Criolla Victory !!! 1807: Second British invasion of Buenos Aires Criolla Victory !!! 1845 - 1850: War of Parana Criolla Victory !!! ........ .... ................
I think you mean "border"... unless Argentina was basing its claim on moving the guy paying to live in their house closer to the Falklands was actually what you meant.
United Provinces of the Río de la Plata is one of the official names of Argentina to this day... Furthermore, the political denomination of the country is irrelevant here, Argentina as a geographical concept and the demonym of Argentinian/Argentinean (to refer to someone born in this geographical region) have existed since the 16th century. There is a poem from 1602, called ''Argentina y Conquista del Río de la Plata''. It is estimated that the people who inhabited those lands were already considered Argentine, geographically speaking, at least 40 years before this poem was written. And the fact that Patagonia was not effectively occupied until the late 19th century doesn't mean it wasn't explored and considered ours by law. Plus, in the current provinces of Santa Cruz, Chubut and Río Negro there were several military garrisons and settlements dating back to the 18th century (and the first of them dating back to the 16th century), which we inherited from Spain. That is, we were indeed present in Patagonia way before our independence. Another thing worth noting is that this country is diverse and WE ARE MIXED with the natives. EVEN with those from Patagonia. So we also have the right to be there, simply because it's the land of our ancestors.
Awesome documentation! You should have mentioned Operation Black Buck (the bombing of Stanley airfield in several long-range operations by the British). Very interesting episode.
This is an exceptional documentary. The use of first rate animated graphics and maps to clearly display each stage of the conflict is first rate. The commentary is clear concise and highly informative- without needless rhetorical flourishes you find in many documentaries where the narrator "gets in the way" of the story telling. So much content squeezed into the comprehensive presentation. The simplicity of presentation makes it easy to follow and understand with a clear geographical overview that allows the viewer to see everything in context. All of this skilfully conceals the amount of planning and painstaking research in preparing this feature length production. One of the best documentaries I've seen about any conflict!
@@lukealadeen7836No. The Falklands was originally discovered by both the french and the british first. The east of the island was discovered by the french in 1764 while the west was discovered in 1770. The reason why the spanish had a claim in the island in the first place is due to the treaty in which the world is divided by spain and portugal (which remains a subject of disputes in south america to this day) due to this reasoning the french, allied to the spanish willingly sold the island while the spanish took over the british side from force.
It’s kinda amazing to see exactly how many instances of bad luck and poor decisions had to line up for the Sheffield to be sunk. Combine that with the skill and technology available to the Argentinian pilots, and you end up with a ship that specializes in Anti-Air getting sunk by two planes.
British military technology was pretty crap, some Harriers (GR3) had no radars, the tech on the RN destroyers wasn't up to missile defence, some ships were basically fireworks ready to burn. The Blowpipe was only successful against a Harrier (the Argentines had some).
@@EdMcF1 Royal Navy doctrine before the Falklands War was to monitor the GIUK gap and hunt Soviet submarines not to fight a expeditionary war thousands of miles away. Royal Navy AA missiles were designed to shoot down high altitude Soviet bombers not low flying attack aircraft. The fleet had lots of anti submarine warfare frigates but no large AA destroyers except HMS Bristol. The capabilities of Type 42 destroyer got nerfed by defence cuts
Agreed, seems like egregious incompetence on his end, for if he had his ship ready like Glasgow, I don't think Sheffield would have been lost, maybe still hit, but less damage, or better damage mitigation. Honestly, the captain's actions should be criminal though why satellite communications were allowed, which interfered with its primary duty of air defense, could be a reflection of poor command by the Admiral too if allowed by the Task Force commander in prior orders.
Type 42's were the cheapest design option- basically a frigate sized ship with a 4.5" gun, a chopper, torpedo tubes, and a sea dart launcher with 22 missiles. As designed they had no CWIS, no short range interceptors, and in 1982 the satellite linkup did interfere with other things apparently. They were upgraded after the war with close in weapons systems, and other vital additions. But their small size basically limited them to simple air defense platforms with gun capacity, yet they proved versatile and good ships despite these drawbacks. Exeter at the Falklands and Gloucester in Desert Storm achieved dramatic missile intercepts, and before she got sunk at the Falklands Coventry did stellar work defending the invasion force. Still a really stupid decision to scrap them instead of putting them in reserve or Heaven forbid keeping them around to actually get a bigger Fleet- with VLS tubes and new radars they'd still be useful ships to have around (as would type 22 and type 23 frigates, and the Invincibles...)
Sadly the ships are pretty obsolete, even as reserve ships. They don't have the power capacity for VLS without going through a complete engine refit, which at that point it's not cost effective. Nothing corrodes like sea water either, ships are just doomed to eventually 'rust', the older the ship the more it costs to keep maintained from manpower to material. Most of the time a ship is retired is because it lacks the power capacity for the newest upgrades, that's why ships have been designed today for next gen technology now that we kind of know what it's going to be. The power draw for a modern data and sensor suite is just absurd. It's why the American ships like the Ticonderoga and Arleigh Burke are so good, because they have the hull volume to have had so many upgrades! British ships are comparatively tiny compared to their USN counterparts.@@robruss62
Not everything needs to be mentioned mate! If that was the case then there would also be mentions of the cooks and catering staff. Because they made the breakfasts before every battle. The medics. Etc etc. No one wants to hear every single detail because the video would be 16 hours long! Where do you draw the line???
Not true at all . The minefields were marked as best as could be done and a tiny portion of AP mines were lifted..usually on approach routes. But 4 blokes from 3 para were injured by mines on the way to Mt Longdon. The Battle for mount longdon started silent but went noisey when Cpl Brian Milne stepped on a mine. Source: I was in 3 Para at the time and had to run across an uncleared mine field under fire ..no other choice.
I have only known very general and superficial information about the Falkland war, this documentary was the best I could have looked for and found. It kept me captivated like only few documentaries do, so well narrated and presented with the most details possible I feel, as much as from the tactical, technical and human aspect that a war conflict unfortunately brings, but without making viewers get lost in all of those images and numerous information. Very well done, great job!
I have watched many documentaries on this war. This had many details the others hadn't covered. Some of the others had interviews with survivors on both sides. Taken all together this is a very well covered war. The Russo -Ukraine war, if and when it ends, will be more difficult due to the staggering amount of information.
From the statements of both sides you almost forget they were at war. A lot of honorable men just doing their job. Tragic anyone had to lose their lives over this.
To be honest a lot of the Argentinians were conscripts and treated very poorly by the military leadership. Many surrendered immediately knowing they would likely only be POWs a short time before being repatriated.
This is the most comprehensive,clear and entertaining documentary on the Falklands war I’ve seen. Commentary, graphics and film footage is just brilliantly balanced. Clearly and awful amount of time and research has been made. Thank you . 👍🏴🇬🇧🏴
I was a junior in college when the Falkands War started. It was all over the news at the time, but the level of detail presented in this video was never shown. This was thoroughly interesting and informative. Great work!
I was there onboard SS ATLANTIC CAUSEWAY, which never gets a mention in any documentary even though we prepared the Seakings for the SAS operations to drop them in Argentina, refuelling most of the Helicopters and fresh Fish and Chips for aircrew, medically treated the Welsh Gaurds and Civilian crew of Sir Galahad etc.
Trying something different with a cut of all the Falklands episodes together into one cohesive documentary. Hope you enjoy it!
You are amazing.
I like it alot.
Very cool
Love it!
Absolutely fantastic
Hearing that the captain of the Belgrano and other naval officers actually defended Britain’s actions and saying they would’ve done the same is very admirable of them. I had no idea that they did that
Very honorable man, gave several very good interviews about it over the years.
The Argentine Navy, has apparently always viewed the sinking of the ARA General Belgrano as a legitimate act of war. It's usually been the Argentine government that have tried to claim it was a warcrime
Elements of the British Left never could accept the UK's right to defend itself, and set in chain a smear campaign. A head of the Argentine Navy said that to say that the sailors were murdered was an insult to their memory as sailors who died in battle, in a letter to La Nacion.
Because lying would make them look like even bigger losers.
True soldier. War without hatred.
He was doing his duty, while the British did theirs.
Quite simply the best documentary I have seen on the Falklands War. Excellent graphics, and use of contemporary archive materials. Very impressive piece.
I have to second that comment. This is the best and most comprehensive documentary I have ever watched. It must have taken you weeks to put together. Fantastic.
the name is ISLAS MALVINAS
@@loudermusiconly for 74 days my friend.
Agreed. I clicked on it by accident but stuck till the end. Just listening to the account of PTSD off Falkland vets while recalling a girl I knew who lived in a homeless hostel with a Falklands vet. Most in there were on hard drugs and nursing different forms of trauma. One reason I would be reluctant to go to war would be PTSD.......I probably have it already....... death would be better than enduring a life like that. Some people can never go back to civilian life for other reasons. Boredom or whatever
@@loudermusic Argentina is the lawful property of the Spanish King.
Argentine here. Thanks for making this exceptional documentary. 100% Respect to Great Britain and RIP to all lost on both sides. Hopefully all their lives paid for the possibility to resolve future disputes by non violent means. 🇬🇧❤🇦🇷
Hopefully, Argentina as a country and a people, sees that this dispute is settled, and moves on.
@@rickyphillips7630 Agreed. It's difficult to move on when politicians use it as an emotional button they can just push whenever they need popularity, but eventually younger generations are going to care less and less about rehashing pointless disputes of the past and more about actual relevant issues.
Look what happened to top gear in Argentina LOL salty fucks can’t cope we took back islands that were never theirs
I've made many comments on here in support of my country during the Falklands War but I hold out my hand to you for your comment.
🇬🇧🇦🇷
You are shame of your ancestors, British occupy your land and you think that in some time you will solve it peacefully. There is no possibility to solve anything peacefully with the West
As a Falklands veteran i found this to be an accurate and detailed video and exalant commentary brought back a lot of memories.
Thank you for your part in liberating the Falkland Islands.
Jolly good work! Salutations from across the North Sea 🫡🇧🇻
@@audience2 How can you know if he/she is or is not truthful? 😅
@@terroristigaIt would be a He , there were no women soldiers
@@thewingedhussars6313 Thanks.
As an ex Royal Marine Commando I have watched many Falklands documentary’s over the years. This by far is the best with so many bits of information I was not aware of. It fills me with pride to watch this knowing what my country and everyone who had taken part in help accomplish.
May all who fell Rest In Peace. 🇬🇧
I hope you include the young Argentinian conscripts when you praise all that fell. I hope you include all of the merchant seaman serving on RFA ships who were refused the option they had been promised to leave at Ascension Island in your prayers. I was on RFA Resource, a ship full of weapons (including nuclear) who were provided with almost no cover from the British military, as our own dictator had systematically dismantled the need for military defence.
As a young Scotsman I had seen everything we stood for cruelly torn from us by that evil piece of crap. Men who were proud to work in the pits, to provide coal to the steel workers who made steel to build ships, who made the ships to provide work for the dockers.
I am sad for everyone that lost their life or were injured in a war that was manufactured between Thatcher and Galtieri to save their political careers, I am still haunted by the bombs dropped around me in San Carlos Bay. I take no joy in our victory.
@@superstardeejay2468 it’s unfortunate that even today some don’t even allow you to be patriotic and proud which is probably why you replied to me instead of leaving it a main comment. When I say “all” I mean ALL.
We obviously have different views on this but as a veteran of two lengthy frontline deployments to Afghan and Iraq by my government I don’t whine about it, I did what was expected so please don’t preach to me about bombs.
I am not here to argue but leave my respects and to commend this video.
Britain has no business being there. Pride is the last thing you should be feeling.
A series of CIA aerial photography analyses showed the level of detail of U.S. surveillance of Argentine forces on the ground: "Vessels present include the 25 de Mayo aircraft carrier with no aircraft on the flight-deck," reads one; "at the airfield [redacted] were parked in the maintenance area [....] 707 is on a parking apron with its side cargo door open," reads another.
reading the declassified stuff about secret US support .
@@DeadCat-42 that would be interesting to read. Where do you find it or is it just a google search? Thanks.
Thank you for producing this doco. In 1982 at the age of 14, I was in southern Argentina with my father (a glaciologist), as part of a glaciology conference. The war broke out just as we arrived in the southern town of Rio Gallegos, after our tour of Patagonia. As two New Zealanders, we were the only Commonwealth members of the trip and became very anxious about being detained in Argentina. In fact, our scheduled flight back to Buenos Aires, on an Aerolineas Argentinas Boeing 727 was cancelled as the plane was commandeered to fly Argentine Army personnel to the 'Islas Malvinas', as we got to know them. Things got worse as the NZ government cancelled all flights between Argentina and Auckland, NZ. Diplomatic communications between the NZ embassy and the Argentinian authorities saw us fly to BA and then onto Los Angeles (on an Aerolineas Argentinas plane!). Seeing our Air New Zealand Boeing 747 in LA was quite an experience. I still have a good deal of Argentinian war-related material from the episode, it seems quite historic now - at the age of 56 !
Lucky to have a father like that to travel to exotic places
I never even knew there was such a profession.
Learn something new everyday.
Las Malvinas son argentinas
BORRRRRIIIINNGGGGG
@@jonahlittle-bw5oo 1) What a nuanced response. 2). And yet you still read the piece. 3) So tell us your interesting story from that event, it must be RIIIVITING !
I was there as a nineteen year old Royal Marine in Four Five Commando. I was st Two Sisters and was watching Longdon thinking 'that looks rough' - apparently the Para's were looking at Two Sisters thinking the same. My OC received the MC & my Section Commander the MM for that night's work. As for me - I was simply pleased to come home.
I'm now in regular contact with an Argentine mortar-man who was at Two Sisters: after trying to kill each other we're now friends. I'm also friends with the son of an Argentine KIA fighter pilot who is coming over this summer, 2024, to stay a few days at my home.
Interesting times and a great, well researched story which I listened to as I pottered about. Well Done!
This is bar none the best documentary on the Falklands War I’ve seen, great visuals combined with clear and understandable narration
As Argentinian, it is the most complete and mainly Neutral documentary that I have seen, showing a lot of respect to both parties. Unnecessary war, between a country (Argentina) historically not warlike (politically and culturally) whose politicians were looking for a distraction to hide their terrible national policies, against a militarily overwhelming country like Great Britain. Both fighting with bravery and honor.
Perhaps for the British it does not represent such an important war in terms of forces and casualties, taking into account its long military history, but for us and our limited war history it was.
May the perished rest in peace, and may it serve to remember the consequences of unnecessary wars.
If I can comment on Belgrano. Obviously it represents a defeat and a disgrace for my compatriots. But if analyzed neutrally, we were an aggressor country and another that defended itself. A couple of miles from the exclusion zone doesn't change anything. Both parties would have done the same.
Que hacemos acá?
Why are you sugar coating the British in your comment? The Malvinas Islas are Argentinian. The Brits never had any rights to them. Just like many parts of the world, they stole the lands from the people, and here you are giving them credit. Come on!
Finally, a sensible, respectful comment. I hope all is well- from the UK
One thing that's often overlooked, on both sides, is the mental toll of the war on those who fought it. I can't remember his name, but there was a British gunner on one of the taskforce ships who shot down one of the Argentine fighters and he was haunted by the image of the plane catching on fire after being hit and was certain when he saw the crash site that there was no way the pilot had survived. But, unbeknownst to him, the pilot, Mariano Velasco, ejected before impact and survived. In 2012, just before the 30th anniversary of the conflict, as part of a project through the BBC programme "Inside Out Yorkshire," he was taken to Velasco's house in Argentina and in a tearjerking moment, these two men from different sides, warmly embraced one another
It still blows my mind that sinking a enemy warship during a war of aggression is seen as a controversial issue
The thing is that wasn't a declaración if war that wew commin aa until this war more or less.
@@PlaDroidGibberish
@@PlaDroid da fuq
@@PlaDroiddid you suffer a stroke half way through typing that comment?
When it's a conservative in power the media will try to make a "controversy" out of literally anything.
I was an Australian civilian working for the New Zealand Defence Dept. during the conflict. I saw information and was happy to note it published in full within days to the public. Both good and bad news, which inspired great confidence in the news media. A time I will never forget.
Wouldn't happen now would it? We don't get any clear info out of current warzones
@@realtruth4804 nono we get real time information of war zones now. just take a look at ukraine we know everything that happened at every second of the war... why? social media
The publishing about the attack on goose green wipes out the Paras confidence in it.
That is literally the most brilliantly illustrated video of the Falklands War I have ever seen. You really do deserve the praise you get for this. I couldn't be any more impressed than I am. If I were to pick the best video I have seen in the last ten years, this one would take the prize. Thank you.
Just incredible. I’ve watched all these videos separately, but clicked on the video anyways. It’s just impossible to click away. You did a fantastic job as always.
What an incredibly well produced documentary. I’m genuinely blown away by the level of detail. Thank you and please keep up this fascinating work.
My father was in the Welsh Guard that was sent to the Falklands. He filmed almost everything there to the point his original film and and diaries of his time there was pretty much given its own section in the British Military Museum’s Falkland exhibition that they are creating. I don’t know if the channel owner looks at comments but if you would like I can send you a copy
can i get a copy ?
You should upload it
Thanks to your Dad for his service.
If you upload pls post the link here tyvm
We, from Argentina, want to see these! Best regards from Ushuaia - Patagonia Argentina
What a fantastic video, very well written and informative. The only thing that would of been worth a mentioning was the Vulcan bombing mission against the port stanley airfield. The amount of tankers and air to air refueling to get that far was just insane.
Loved the video and love the channel!
It is fantastic! If you want, there was a video on it by The Operations Room a few years ago if you look for it.
He didn't go into detail on it, but it looks like there was a graphic showing the Vulcan bombing at 32:12
The country that killed more than any other during the war was the French...
Tankers refuelling tankers was just insane on it's own. I've seen a documentary on the whole flight plan and the refuelling requirements and only the RAF could have come up with it!
The Blackbuck Vulcan raid was militarily insignificant and the filmmaker was probably right to quickly brush over it without going into detail about the huge effort behind the scenes that went into the mission.
Argentina on the sinking of the Belgrano, "A treacherous act of armed aggression" from the country that hadn't declared war but invaded the Falkland islands and blew up a barracks in Stanley where they beleived nearly 100 marines were stationed and were asleep...
Argentina's ruling junta of the time were treacherous scumbags, but as both the video and other posters have pointed out, the Belgrano's captain and Argentina's military in general conducted themselves honorably even when their rulers were pushing for worse...
Accuse your enemy of exactly what your doing
@@wheneggsdrop1701 happens in life more often than not
Britain and their colonialism ^ ^
@@StraightOuttaPaddock Protecting their rightful land is colonialism to you? Not too bright
Wow!
Over the years I've watched many histories of the Falkland Islands War. And I lived through it.
Most histories have focused, mainly, on the land war with lots of details and footage of the landing at Goose Harbor through victory at Stanley.
This provides hiorical context, and all the happenings before the British attack/s. Nice!
Best production I've seen. Ever.
Thanks.
That was one of the best and most comprehensive accounts of the Falkland’s war I have ever seen. RIP all the brave men on both sides who lost their lives - what a tragedy.
The attention to detail is akin to an autopsy of this war and I’m not kidding I found this mesmerising
Huge congratulations to the team that made this …. It’s quite simply breathtaking and I don’t say that lightly
I knew nothing about this war until I found these videos of yours and Learned so much really appreciate your effort in doing this
Thank you for this documentary. Well put together and detailed. Respect from Jamaica 🇯🇲
This is an absolutely brilliant program. You can't overstate how large the Falklands conflict loomed over everyone. There was a real fear here in America as well as elsewhere that the war cold result in a power shift that would send Argentina into alleginment with the Soviets and broaden the USSR's influence. Of course that didn't happen but there was no way to know this at the time. An excellent documentary of a major historical event.
Argentina would never ever alingn with communists, at that time actually our military forces were working closely with USA to fight communist guerrilla in Argentina.
Our government in Argentina is and was deeply anticommunist. It had never aligned with the Soviet Union while the United States allowed them to conquer and enslave half of Europe.
It"s interesting to see that Thatchers decision wasn't so cut and dried from a start and there was lot of hesitation. From other documentaries you get a feeling like as she was sending ships the moment the Argentinians started barely thinking about invading Falklands.
I think something that is underplayed a lot is just what a colossal political risk Thatcher was taking in sending the task force. If it had been a disaster (which it easily could have been), it would have brought her government down
The mad cow had been told a year before that this was Argentinian plan by the Chilian. She did nothing except order the scrapping of HMS Ark Royal, the sale of HMS Invincible to the Australians and the sale of a LSD to Argentina which fell through. She then ordered the scrapping of the Ice Class Patrol ship HMS Endurance!
@@historigraphHi. I'm Chilean. Good content. About Thatcher, she was forced by the circumstances: 1) If she didn't do anything, she was a political cadaver walking. 2) If she sent the Task Force, it could or could not end in disaster. There is a better prospect of political survival with number 2) if you think it very rationally. But in the moment, the tension, fear and shock can cloud our own judgement.
@@historigraph I'm sure her office also had to take into account how this would play out on the world stage remember this was during the Cold War and Argentina was a communist run country. The Cuban missile crisis was still fresh in people's minds, the few near launch threats on both sides, and the Soviets we're eerily quiet through all of this. This was a very dangerous global chess board.
@@jon759 Argentina wasn't run by communists or a Soviet ally, on the contrary, the junta was officially anti-communist and an ally of United States.
Very well done. Love the in depth explanations instead of just summarizing events that defined the battle.
//;*;*;;*;*;;*;//.
Excellent documentary. I was in the Falklands/Malvinas for the first time in December this year. Your research and delivery is just fantastic. The animations are super smooth and insightful.
It’s called the FALKLANDS, you don’t include irrelevant outdated translations of any other country alongside their REAL name, do you? So why do you feel the need to disrespect the brave fighters for Falkland freedom? Don’t be scared of seething argies and anti western Russian bots
1,5h video about Falklands? What a delightful gift
Absolutely amazing video on this interesting conflict. Massive respect to those on both sides who gave their lives for their country. Well done lads
Thoroughly enjoyable! Also significant was the support of Chilean gorvernment of moving some of their troops to the border, forcing Argentina to keep strong army groups home, as a precaution.
2 or so years prior, Argentina was posturing to go to war with Chile for some islands in the patagonia, so...not so strange that Chile sided with the british in this conflict.
Britain and Chile have always been friends
Ah I didn't realize that. I was wondering why the Argentine garrison on the Falklands seemed so small. I would have fortified that place like nobody's business to make Britain really have to work for taking the islands back. But if there was a feisty Chile in the picture... makes sense!
@@Eggnog18 as an Argentine I can tell you that our army back in the 80s, and even nowadays, is small, unprepared and unexperienced. Our government, for some weird reason, thought that since the world and the UK were going through bad economic and political times we would have the upper hand.
Politics aside, and whether you think the islands are british or argentine, I think we can all agree our government was delusional and we never stood a chance against a first world powerhouse like the UK army.
La traición de chile Perú estubo con argentina
Your documentary about this concise war was exceptional, a superb incorporation of graphics and historical footage. I thoroughly appreciated this summary.
This was the best documentary I have seen on the conflict. Absolutely fantastic work!
Earned a subscription with this one, I've spent a lot of time in the Falklands and this video is accurate, respectful and beautifully made
You didn't need to qualify that "Argentina had severe economic problems" statement by saying "at the time".
You kid, but they were doing very well for themselves earlier in the century. Well enough to own multiple battleships :)
@@Freyja666yeah but the world’s consumers eventually got fed up with tinned corned beef and stopped buying it.
@@Freyja666 so, 80 years earlier?
@@jacaredosvudu1638 i'm just pointing out that 'at the time' is a fair statement :)
@@Freyja666 ships bought from us
Quite astonishing how quickly Britain was able to pull together a fleet to retake the Falklands. Well done!
its argentina man.... that wasnt even a challenge for the UK
captivating and well made, one of the best falklands docs ive seen! And lots of info ive never known before. bloody well done.
This was a great documentary, I greatly enjoyed it. I was in the Falklands working for the British Antarctic Survey 5 years after the war and decided one day to walk 40km from Port Stanley to the top of Mount Kent and back. I almost walked through an uncleared Argentinian minefield on the return! The captain wasn't very happy with me because I was late back to the RRS John Biscoe.
Lucky you didn't kill yourself
Thank you for the great content, keep it up. Your video’s are always a great watch. Greetings from the Netherlands
Thank you so much for the support!
This is by far the best Falklands documentary I have ever watched. I like how you identify the ranks in the native languages. Good job all around!
I love these, somehow far more evocative than typical footage docs. 👍🇬🇧
Malvinas 🇦🇷
@@Mig29_Fulcrum Not any more.. 📚🇬🇧
What does that mean in english? We found it before agrentina was a thing. Never has been, never will be yours.
The Belgrano was formally the American USS Phoenix which was present at Pearl Harbour on December 7, 1941.
Yes indeed, I actually just wrote the book "Phoenix & Belgrano: The Life and Death of a Warship" covering it.
I believe "formerly" is the word you're looking for.
That's awesome info. It was fayed that it will at the hand of the British at Falkland. What a fateful day.
The best historical film or documentary I have ever seen. EXCELENT. CONGRATULATIONS. Greetings from Mexico City.
I love how you explained the positions of both sides with the fog of war to really illustrate the context behind big decisions.
16:40 fair play to our Royal Marines, might not have been a winnable fight but they still went well above and beyond
The British Major screwed up. His trying to cover all the beaches around the airport meant he didn't have enough forces to defend anywhere effectively. That's a mistake a butter bar would do and a Major's should know better. It was REALLY DUMB!
P.S. Being on the defensive you're expected to defeat a force three times your size since you get to set up the kill boxes, mine fields etc. and do it from cover.
@@readhistory2023 he defended against the (correct) assumed landing ground, while not committing war crimes like setting land mines. It was a bold but effective move by the Argentinians to go after political buildings but it worked. I don't see your solution working (legally, and) better than his.
There's only so much you can do with a few dozen troops
@@readhistory2023 wtf is a butter bar 😂
@@obvious-trollUS slang term for a 2LT, as the rank is a golden bar.
@@atfjacknz doesn’t he know that this isn’t an American war
In New York I watched this intently on TV every day at the time. Everyone I knew was rooting for the Brits. Still, this documentary filled in so much information that was omitted from typical TV sources...great job! Best part: Democracy won in both countries!
And boy look how entertaining that democracy has been 😂, Boris the bumbling idiot, rishi sunak, Liz truss's nightmare, former pm on the cabinet as a lord, and Javier milei as Argentinas president!
Absolutely stunning documentation! Nicely done.
Nice video as a former marine 45 cdo Falklands veteran good to see the bigger picture will always miss the guys we lost
Soy argentino mis respetos para los qe murieron de ambos bandos
Happy holidays! Excellent channel! Thanks for all your efforts at fairness, accuracy, clarity, and great animations!
I like the short and snappy style of your normal videos. It allows precise access to anything I feel like watching and is very accessible before sleeping. That being said, if anyone deserves to and has the capacity to make documentaries of this size- which still is quite short honestly- it would be you. I hope you continue the longer documentaries and hope you are still enjoying this project.
Argentina invades the islands, but calls the sinking of Belgrano "aggression". Hypocrites
Chill dude
@@nicosonoronah, he's right
@@1TruNub even the captain of the belgrano said that sinking the Belgrano was the right thing to do in that context. Thats why i think he should call down. Is the way war is imo
@@nicosonoro yeah true, but he's still right.
@@nicosonoro No, no. He's right.
Excellent work. Although I lived through the conflict, and saw it on the news every day in my lower 6th year, I've never seen it in one go before. It makes a lot more sense to me now and I really appreciate the effort that went into making this complete analysis. Thank you.
I couldn't put this video down. 10/10
min max latvia pls :3
Apparently Australia offered the Brits that Australian navy was ready to come to the fight too, and were told that their help was not required. Australians must LOVE warfare, they seem to have been in every war they can.
Well especially when Her Majesty's subjects are threatened. We've always got your backs mate. But I think the Kiwi's sent HMNZS Canterbury to the Indian Ocean to relive a Royal Navy ship so the Poms could have more ships ready for the war. Those sheep shaggers are a dependable lot.
Nah, the Aussies just understand the true meaning of the word ally, same as the Kiwis and the Canadians!
I read somewhere online that the Australians offered nothing militarily, but did offer to give a few Falkland Islanders, Australian residency!..
What a silly comment ! Australia are our friends you idiot ! I would hope that we would offer help to them in a similar situation !
Some year's later when former NZ PM Robert Muldoon was on a British Airways flight the pilot announced that he was on board. Most of the passengers stood up and gave him a standing ovation.@@davids5566
I actually was never taught this nor did I ever go out of my way to learn about it until this video. Good work. I was rooting for the Brits the entire time. Glad I wasn't let down.
This is perhaps the most comprehensive documentary I have seen on the falklands war. Nicely done!
Thank you so much for this video. I can honestly say that this is THE best documentary on the Falkland's War I have yet seen. You gave a perfect balance of tactics, with history, with inserts of relevant footage of the time and war. I did not get distracted from your video once; it was that engaging. During the entire video I had the Falkland Islands called up on Google earth and I was looking at the terrain, distances and the topography of the scene as you described it. Again, thank you so much.
Great, another excuse to rewatch this series! I enjoy your video so much, fantastic work on these and making history fun. 🎉
Incredible documentary.
Brilliant work man, Congratulations!
This is why, when Argentina faced off against France during the last World Cup, the UK was rooting for France.
First time for anything I suppose.
WRONG.
@@OrbvsTomarvm ?
I'm not sure if Argentina has many friends.
I wasnt
Amazing documentary!! Very well done.
Would like to see more like this
i still find it amazing that The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland actually pulled this off to send troops and ships within days with all the logistics involved, the food, drink. ammo, aircraft. change of clothing, medical supplies and staff..then go 8,000 miles to fight a war against odds and win. amazing
Not possible without the support of usa.
@@PlaDroidwhat support did the us give?
@@spidos1000 food packs and logistics i'm ascención island plus seawind rocket
@@PlaDroid Ascension Islands belong to Britain anyway.
@@PlaDroid plus this was a war with the longest logistics supply line of any war ever.
Fantastic stuff. Highly informative and well created. Thank you
This was so well made! Keep up the good work, This is the first I have stumbled upon this channel! subscribed!!
You cannot 'recapture' something that was never yours in the first place. The Falklands were only ever owned in the beginning by the British, and the French on one of the islands at one point, and the Spanish briefly. Argentina was not even a sovereign nation when Great Britain first landed on the deserted Islands.
Good and objetive documentary, a classmate from my school die on the Belgrano Cruise...short and brutal war ..honor
Very made documentary. Cheers. I really enjoyed the tactical deployment graphics and maps. Keep making more like this.
I literally just binged your entire falklands series last night what is this timing!
That's nothing. I saw a sheep yesterday as I was eating a penguin biscuit. Blew my mind 🙄
I’ve been looking for a good documentary on the Falkland conflict for a while. I’m so glad I found this! Great work.
Absolutely well done! I have only ever heard bits and pieces about this conflict though my life, this video explains it very, very well! Thank you!
Excellent description of the Falkland's war which was quite graphic in detail.
I don't see a problem with the sinking of Belgrano, firstly due to what the commanding officer of Belgrano said afterward. But I also have my pointers:
1. her group had 16 ASuW missile available
2. Then there is Belgrano her self. if they fired 16 missiles, and while the British task group was busy defending and or rescuing sailors, etc. Belgrano could just have steamed in and open fire with here 5 triple 6 in guns, thats 15 guns, and no british ship in that group would stand a chance against that.
Or, just look at it this way…in a war, the Belgrano was an enemy ship. It was in the vicinity of the Falklands for one reason only, and that wasn’t sight-seeing. As for the exclusion zone, the British government said any Argentine ships within it would be sunk. At no point did they say they wouldn’t sink enemy ships outside of it.
I will NEVER understand the uproar over the Belgrano. It was a naval vessel in the service of a nation at war. Submarines are SUPPOSED to sink enemy naval vessels wherever and whenever they find them. All this "it was treacherous aggression" and "outside the area" and "sailing away" is completely irrelevant. The ONLY thing that should be able to save a naval vessel from destruction during war is if its a hospital ship...or surrendering. Anything else should not be a surprise to anyone.
yea. britain never bitched about the ships she lost.
@manos-mf7uj it would be like the Japanese lodging a formal complaint that the US sunk their carriers at Midway as they were sailing away from the island...
@@manos-mf7ujyeah well they were inside the exclusion zone, so even though I agree, I have to point out that those were two different situations
it was a military junta, what else would you expect? it's like complaining that the nazis weren't always 100% honest. it's called propaganda
@lecooldude it wasn't just the Argentinians that got butthurt about it though, it became this big international incident for some weird reason and Britain took a shitload of flak for it, like it was some kind of warcrime.
One of the men who rescued those SAS Soldiers stuck on the Glacier was Chris Parry, and I highly recommend anyone interested in the topics to listen to one of his talks on his experience during the War. Very insightful and hilarious at times.
For clarity, Parry was one of the crew, but he wasn’t the pilot or the one in command of the mission
@@historigraph fair point. Edited it to "one of the men"
This was fantastic. Respectful to both sides and important context given to each stage of the conflict. You should do more long form videos.
Ariges forgot one of the Four Rules of War.
1. Never get into a land war in Asia
2. You can never hold Afghanistan
3. Never invade Russia in the winter.
4. Never get in to Naval warfare with the British!
Also, if you hear "Send in the Kurkha's" from the other side..... You're screwed!
Theres a fifth; Dont fuck with the United States' boats.
@@Blakesanots96 if you do, things can get real "proportional".
@@Blakesanots96There's a sixth: Don't assume because you have the world's largest and most advanced military that you are always going to win.
@@Blakesanots96There's always one...
Those scrap metal workers certainly gave us an advantage by bringing the conflict forward. Had the AAF got its full complement of Etendards and Exocet the task force would have had a very difficult task. Thank you for posting 😊
I can't imagine trying to take islands from a country that could level Buenos Aires. They must have really thought the UK would back down. But it shows you the kind of carnage that tin-pot dictators can bring to the very people they're ostensibly protecting.
The UK was going through its own political and economic troubles at the time. While it is ages-old wisdom that the best time to plunder a foe's homestead is while it is burning, you need to be careful that you do not become trapped inside it.
What an OUTSTANDING job you did on this.
It wasnt a "re-conquest". Argentina never in history had control of those islands.
Britain left the islands in 1774, never protesting or challenging the 32 Spanish and 5 Argentine governors, any claim prescribed by acquiescence after 55 years of complete silence. They had absolutely no right to take them from Argentina that was already settled in 1833
Yea, shut up nerd
@@SM-zm5xt They were always our Islands, and are still our Islands. Cope all you want about it
@@AverageAlien Yeah, what you say, buddy 😴👌🏼
@@SM-zm5xt What the map says, they're ours
1:21 - Your map is wrong... At the time, there was no Argentina, only the United Provinces of the Río de la Plata (later the Argentine federation before becoming the Republic of Argentina as we know it today) and the boarders of the United provinces were somewhat different to what is shown on your map. Crucially, Patagonia was its own independent territory, meaning the Falklands were a good 1700 km (>1000 miles) from the closest part of the United Provinces of the Río de la Plata.
Only later would the Argininians colonise Patagonia, eventually launching a military conquest (the Conquest of the Desert) in 1870s-80s where Patagonia was formally captured and incorporated into the Argentine Republic.
The notion that "its near us so should belong to us" is a revisionist argument... Unless invading, colonising and subdugating other territories (eg Patagonia) and thereby moving your border closer is now a legitimate form of claim...?
1806: First British invasion of Buenos Aires
Criolla Victory !!!
1807: Second British invasion of Buenos Aires
Criolla Victory !!!
1845 - 1850: War of Parana
Criolla Victory !!!
........
....
................
I think you mean "border"... unless Argentina was basing its claim on moving the guy paying to live in their house closer to the Falklands was actually what you meant.
@@AChapstickOrangevery witty
United Provinces of the Río de la Plata is one of the official names of Argentina to this day... Furthermore, the political denomination of the country is irrelevant here,
Argentina as a geographical concept and the demonym of Argentinian/Argentinean (to refer to someone born in this geographical region) have existed since the 16th century.
There is a poem from 1602, called ''Argentina y Conquista del Río de la Plata''. It is estimated that the people who inhabited those lands were already considered Argentine, geographically speaking, at least 40 years before this poem was written.
And the fact that Patagonia was not effectively occupied until the late 19th century doesn't mean it wasn't explored and considered ours by law. Plus, in the current provinces of Santa Cruz, Chubut and Río Negro there were several military garrisons and settlements dating back to the 18th century (and the first of them dating back to the 16th century), which we inherited from Spain. That is, we were indeed present in Patagonia way before our independence.
Another thing worth noting is that this country is diverse and WE ARE MIXED with the natives. EVEN with those from Patagonia. So we also have the right to be there, simply because it's the land of our ancestors.
Awesome documentation! You should have mentioned Operation Black Buck (the bombing of Stanley airfield in several long-range operations by the British). Very interesting episode.
This is an exceptional documentary. The use of first rate animated graphics and maps to clearly display each stage of the conflict is first rate. The commentary is clear concise and highly informative- without needless rhetorical flourishes you find in many documentaries where the narrator "gets in the way" of the story telling. So much content squeezed into the comprehensive presentation.
The simplicity of presentation makes it easy to follow and understand with a clear geographical overview that allows the viewer to see everything in context. All of this skilfully conceals the amount of planning and painstaking research in preparing this feature length production.
One of the best documentaries I've seen about any conflict!
How can the Argentines recapture something they never owned?
It was taken from the Spanish empire. Argentina is a successor state of that empire
@@lukealadeen7836No. The Falklands was originally discovered by both the french and the british first. The east of the island was discovered by the french in 1764 while the west was discovered in 1770. The reason why the spanish had a claim in the island in the first place is due to the treaty in which the world is divided by spain and portugal (which remains a subject of disputes in south america to this day) due to this reasoning the french, allied to the spanish willingly sold the island while the spanish took over the british side from force.
How imperialist British Fight for a little land 9000miles , th hipocratic /topical British!!
@lukealadeen7836 thank you , very interesting
How do you think the British empire grew so much?? These islands are nowhere near the UK 😂
Incredibly informative and illustrative . I look forward to more like this. Thank you 🎉🎉
I like this long form of your videos, especially while flying.
Cheers from a currently airborne subscriber.
Well done on producing such a quality piece of work, one of the best documentaries I've seen on this subject. Subscribed.
It’s kinda amazing to see exactly how many instances of bad luck and poor decisions had to line up for the Sheffield to be sunk.
Combine that with the skill and technology available to the Argentinian pilots, and you end up with a ship that specializes in Anti-Air getting sunk by two planes.
British military technology was pretty crap, some Harriers (GR3) had no radars, the tech on the RN destroyers wasn't up to missile defence, some ships were basically fireworks ready to burn. The Blowpipe was only successful against a Harrier (the Argentines had some).
@@EdMcF1 Royal Navy doctrine before the Falklands War was to monitor the GIUK gap and hunt Soviet submarines not to fight a expeditionary war thousands of miles away. Royal Navy AA missiles were designed to shoot down high altitude Soviet bombers not low flying attack aircraft.
The fleet had lots of anti submarine warfare frigates but no large AA destroyers except HMS Bristol. The capabilities of Type 42 destroyer got nerfed by defence cuts
@@obvious-trollStop copeing for the Brits, the Glasgo did their job perfectly and the Sheffield had every chance to know they were coming.
@@3magikarpinamansuit281 - perfectly valid explanation
- dumbass: “sToP CoPiNg”
@@EdMcF1 it was that crap that nearly 100 Argentine jets were shot down. 28 of them in dogfights with the harriers, without loss.
So the argies had a naval vessel called “sinko da mayo “ ?
😂
Quite surprised that the captain of the Sheffield didn't end up in front of a military court to be honest.
Agreed, seems like egregious incompetence on his end, for if he had his ship ready like Glasgow, I don't think Sheffield would have been lost, maybe still hit, but less damage, or better damage mitigation. Honestly, the captain's actions should be criminal though why satellite communications were allowed, which interfered with its primary duty of air defense, could be a reflection of poor command by the Admiral too if allowed by the Task Force commander in prior orders.
Type 42's were the cheapest design option- basically a frigate sized ship with a 4.5" gun, a chopper, torpedo tubes, and a sea dart launcher with 22 missiles. As designed they had no CWIS, no short range interceptors, and in 1982 the satellite linkup did interfere with other things apparently.
They were upgraded after the war with close in weapons systems, and other vital additions. But their small size basically limited them to simple air defense platforms with gun capacity, yet they proved versatile and good ships despite these drawbacks.
Exeter at the Falklands and Gloucester in Desert Storm achieved dramatic missile intercepts, and before she got sunk at the Falklands Coventry did stellar work defending the invasion force.
Still a really stupid decision to scrap them instead of putting them in reserve or Heaven forbid keeping them around to actually get a bigger Fleet- with VLS tubes and new radars they'd still be useful ships to have around (as would type 22 and type 23 frigates, and the Invincibles...)
Sadly the ships are pretty obsolete, even as reserve ships. They don't have the power capacity for VLS without going through a complete engine refit, which at that point it's not cost effective. Nothing corrodes like sea water either, ships are just doomed to eventually 'rust', the older the ship the more it costs to keep maintained from manpower to material.
Most of the time a ship is retired is because it lacks the power capacity for the newest upgrades, that's why ships have been designed today for next gen technology now that we kind of know what it's going to be. The power draw for a modern data and sensor suite is just absurd. It's why the American ships like the Ticonderoga and Arleigh Burke are so good, because they have the hull volume to have had so many upgrades! British ships are comparatively tiny compared to their USN counterparts.@@robruss62
For propaganda purposes I assume.
The captain was a submariner and second in command was a helicopter pilot!
A truly superb documentary! Best one on the Falkland War I've ever seen! Sublime work.
Great timing for this video ; Venezuelan troops are massing on Guyana's border...
A very good production. Be proud of it. Well done. 👍
Not one mention of the Royal Engineer support that was instrumental in the identifying and lifting of mine fields before almost every battle.
Not everything needs to be mentioned mate! If that was the case then there would also be mentions of the cooks and catering staff. Because they made the breakfasts before every battle. The medics. Etc etc. No one wants to hear every single detail because the video would be 16 hours long! Where do you draw the line???
@ZaHandle I mean, yeah - me too. But ya get what I mean.
Not true at all . The minefields were marked as best as could be done and a tiny portion of AP mines were lifted..usually on approach routes. But 4 blokes from 3 para were injured by mines on the way to Mt Longdon. The Battle for mount longdon started silent but went noisey when Cpl Brian Milne stepped on a mine.
Source: I was in 3 Para at the time and had to run across an uncleared mine field under fire ..no other choice.
I have only known very general and superficial information about the Falkland war, this documentary was the best I could have looked for and found. It kept me captivated like only few documentaries do, so well narrated and presented with the most details possible I feel, as much as from the tactical, technical and human aspect that a war conflict unfortunately brings, but without making viewers get lost in all of those images and numerous information. Very well done, great job!
I have watched many documentaries on this war. This had many details the others hadn't covered. Some of the others had interviews with survivors on both sides. Taken all together this is a very well covered war. The Russo -Ukraine war, if and when it ends, will be more difficult due to the staggering amount of information.
😊 on
The scale is much larger indeed.
information, misinformation and disinformation
@@Simon-ry6vx True. Historians will be dining out on this one for decades trying sort out which is which.
From the statements of both sides you almost forget they were at war. A lot of honorable men just doing their job. Tragic anyone had to lose their lives over this.
To be honest a lot of the Argentinians were conscripts and treated very poorly by the military leadership. Many surrendered immediately knowing they would likely only be POWs a short time before being repatriated.
There is no respect anyway
This is the most comprehensive,clear and entertaining documentary on the Falklands war I’ve seen. Commentary, graphics and film footage is just brilliantly balanced. Clearly and awful amount of time and research has been made. Thank you . 👍🏴🇬🇧🏴
I was a junior in college when the Falkands War started. It was all over the news at the time, but the level of detail presented in this video was never shown. This was thoroughly interesting and informative. Great work!
I was there onboard SS ATLANTIC CAUSEWAY, which never gets a mention in any documentary even though we prepared the Seakings for the SAS operations to drop them in Argentina, refuelling most of the Helicopters and fresh Fish and Chips for aircrew, medically treated the Welsh Gaurds and Civilian crew of Sir Galahad etc.