@@sycamorebacker1 True but sadly we have to even though those criminal traitors do not obey any laws including the ( unlawful ) ones they impose on WE the people.!
He should not be able to be in position of any job of justice office 🤬☠️ He’s not telling the truth about his opinion on 2 Amendment and if he is then he Doesn’t qualify for the position ‼️‼️‼️🤬🤥
Honestly I would have asked him why our founding fathers saw fit to add "Shall not be infringed" to the second amendment but not the first or any of the other amendments following the second amendment.
@@bronson6585 a tank HAS a gun...It ISNT a gun itself. It is a VEHICLE of war, much like an 18 wheeler is a Vehicle of Commerce. Even an 18 wheeler needs a special license and training. No regular Joe would get a vehicle of war that is fully operational nor do regular Joe's seek to get such a vehicle. Not only that but such a thing would be severely cost prohibitive thus locking out over 95% of regular people struggling to survive regular life let alone trying to afford a weapon of war.
That man has not answered a single question asked to him. He was asked his opinion, and he talked about what other people would do. Or he would say he hasn't looked into it. Then WTH job is he interviewing for, if he hasn't even done his homework?
They never answer questions anymore they just dance around the questions ! It's always a dog and pony show . I just finished watching Sen Lee asking the FBI director if they are using information from phone companies to locate who was in DC on Jan 6 and same thing just another dance routine !
@@Toddscomp2 lol ..good one , its funny to me when they say exept me for who I am when they cant even to the same ... the good Lord doesnt make mistakes but hey what do I know , "there's nothing new Under the Sun " ( history repeats itself ) Saddam and Gomorra . A man isn't free untill his conscience is - San Lee .
The Second Amendment is already one of the most "regulated" of Amendments. Every read the 1934 NFA? Let me guess you just "feel" that more limitations would help. Answer a question for me. What does "gun show loophole" mean? Ever read the 1968 Gun Control Act? The Heller decision? How many more limitations do you want for a Constitutional Right? Do you have any dangerous books in your home that should be banned? Maybe "Catcher in the Rye"? The Bible or Book of Mormon? For those of us who actually swore an oath to the U.S. Constitution, we understand the sacrifice that upholds our nations principles. For you it's about how you feel. Lemmings march right off the cliff just like you. And remember, just like Mario Cuomo...."What will I do when they come for me?" Think about that. "Bad behavior" created this country you enjoy instead of getting on our knees for the Redcoats. Are you on your knees Danny? I bet you are many times.
@@nomadjeff1922 I think you woefully misunderstood what I was saying. Mike Lee was agreeing that some limitations are prudent , while I was trying to hammer home that shall not be infringed means don’t fuck with it in anyway. I guarantee that the only time you will see me on my knees is on the final judgment day. I will stand and fight to the bloody end for my freedom and the future of my children. I hate this tyranny so much and stand ready to be counted among the resistance. Do you? Will you lay down YOUR life for the liberty of our children??? It’s easy to opine here, what happens when you’re face to face with these goons? I hope and believe that you will stand with me.
Judge Garland used the word "entitled" when referring to who should or should not have arms rights. Natural rights such as the right to self-defense descend from nature and God and are not government entitlements. The Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution recognized some pre-existing historical and natural rights that existed without and before the Constitution and which were not created by it. None of those natural rights can be entitlements. A public servant who does not understand this difference is not fit to serve. Thank you Senator Lee. You are my favorite Senator, followed by Dr. Paul and somewhere in the distance Senators Cruz and Rubio, for your defense of the Constitution as written. I am dismayed that you may perhaps be the only Senator who truly supports and defends the Constitution as written.
@@LoanwordEggcorn But no one uses these to protect their right to own a gun. If people think their 2nd amendment is under siege then use the 9th amendment. It is supposed to protect all of our rights that are not written down . . .
@@jetcitysinatra7300 Agree 100%, but 9th and 10th amendment lawsuits are far more general. Since we have a 2nd amendment, and it's more specific, it applies first. Please note: I agree with you.
@@LoanwordEggcorn We, up until the 1970's no one had the right to privacy but the 9th amendment was used and the court granted Privacy an actual Right. The more it gets used the more it will be accepted as a way to protect our rights. . . Just sayin. If the courts start to apply the 2nd amendment as it was meant to be taken then we will still have the 9th amendment. . .
There are lots of things that I don’t care for with Garland but the 1st listed definition of entitlement literally means a right to something by law or contract. So by using entitlement he has said it is a right by law. Do I trust he means what he says? Not necessarily but entitlement in this context is a correct term.
For a judge he (it) sure has alot of AH's and UH's when (it) he speaks . When it becomes AG, it will have no hesitation with it's pen when it comes to the 2A .!
Does he have an opinion or thought on anything? I am not a judge and I understand the meaning of 'Shall NOT be infringed". I realize that you can't (meaning should NOT be allowed) do a search and seizure (on anything) without a warrant. What a tool. He would have been great in Nazi Germany. Blindly followed orders to a T.
I observe from this interview a salient code switch when answering questions regarding passed decisions as a jurist compared to opinions of policy as a bureaucrat.
The govt doesnt know the difference between a pole or a hole, let alone the duity of posterity the constitution demands of them. Goldfish memory glub glub
Its obvious merrick garland cares not for what America is and means and stands for. As someone who is educated enough to have read most of our founding documents, its history, it's importance, and the sacrifices made for it and then refuse to embrace it. He absolutely disgusts me with his cold refusal to acknowledge what he is and believes. We know he can't because views would b a shock to everyone that loves n their heart, the red white and blue. His disagreement and disdain for our American ideals is very dangerous and frankly sad. That someone can know about this country and the glorious potentials and turn from it, while being n a position of authority, is of grave concern for every single U.S. citizen. I'm flabbergasted as to why people who would drag us all to ruin r able to get support from the public at all.
I think before these committees meet again, they should establish a rule for YES or NO answers only. After which, an explanation to the YES or NO answer can be stated. This "Judge" avoids answering the questions by muttering nonsense as well as hiding behind elected officials by repeating their answers. This guy has no backbone, he may have a mountain of experience, but in this room, it amounts to nothing..
ANY judge OR official that seeks to deny or reject our God given rights granted in 1791 pertaining to our American Constitutional to us as American citizens needs to be disbarred and imprisoned . The 2A was written and debated and accepted as it now stands to STOP all issues relating to it that are such a big issue at this time. In other words: KEEP, HONOR, RESPECT, AND DEFEND OUT CONSTITUTION- or GET OUT OF OFFICE.
Has he answered anything definitively? I have yet to see a clear answer. And if that is normal for these hearings how does it help anyone to make a decision on the merits of a candidate?
Garland is answering these questions as if it’s a Supreme Court nominee hearing instead of a person about to run the largest law enforcement agency that has prosecutorial powers. Considering his answers it appears he will look at all existing court cases and craft policies around loopholes he discovered. President Silver Alert said he wasn’t going to politicize the DOJ yet Garland keeps stating he’s going to pursue the Biden agenda. That hardly sounds apolitical.
Watching these cabinet picks from the old guard is like watching your favorite fighter try to fight in their 50s. Theyre all obviously too cognitively declined to be a Walmart greeter much less run the countrys DOJ.
NOBODY can answer a simple question with a Yes or No and Always comes with a Time Burning repeat of gratuity and I am Sick of It. Of course I'm Late to this party, is this Bagel on Our SCOTUS, I can't seem to find a clear answer?
Millions of Americans know the meaning of the second amendment. It"shall not be infringed" PERIOD!! I hope that we will all stand for America when the time comes.
As written not how you feel! Maybe ask the same about other rights to put him on the spot. The time I looked the second amendment is the only one that states, shall not be infringed. And is the one right the tyrants are infringing on constantly! 18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 should be enforced moving forward. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
How about the part that says " A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state"! Come on people they are saying it without saying it . Form and regulate or we are going to lose our Republic.
I am curious why does the supreme court and other courts fail to recognize , "shall not be infringed upon", and immediately say you can restrict and control? Shall not be infringed???
It’s about time the Construction is considered, in this situation! It’s been laying on their desks for hundreds of years and the Holy Bible is in every room in every hotel and motel in this beautiful republic of The United States of America!
I'm disappointed that Lee let him slide on the fact that Garland hadn't studied the history of the 2nd Amendment since he wants to be the AG. Also disappointed he didn't press him for an answer about whether he believes in banning certain types of firearms. That one was a total non-answer. He should have also pressed the liability issue in drawing comparisons with any other legal product sold in the U.S. Those were no-brainer questions that deserved a decisive answer.
"where there is room under the law for the president's policies to be pursued, I think the president is entitled to pursue them" meaning yes, he's going after your AR-15
You know what would be amazing?. Id be blown away If any one of these nominees could just once, give a straight forward answer to the question that they are asked. It should be an automatic disqualification for any nominee to dance around they way they have been the passed few days..
Why the HELL cant these people answer all their questions!!!! If they cant answer simple questions that make them look guilty of some curruption, they should be fired
I'm with Garland just because his son in-law owns a publishing company that provides CRT materials doesn't mean he sent the FBI after parents who didn't want CRT taught to their sons and daughters.
Judge Garland , is so, so ,So vengeful ; for not being a Supreme court Justice . Yet ! If OBama say you as being Fit , you would of already been one .🤔
For a judge and his position he knows the Constitution and law. It would be nice for us if he stood up for America and the world instead of the lefts agenda.
If you do not want to carry a firearm for self-protection, that's your right. I do want to carry a firearm for my self-protection, and that's my right. No government representative can tell me I can't. I have the right to carry any type of firearm I want for my protection.
This is 7:49 I'll never get back... I couldn't sit through the whole thing. Every time I listen to a politician, even a one masquerading as judge, I need a bath.
It's always so disappointing when people brought before the senate don't even state what they personally believe and dodge questions with "I don't have the information in front of me" or "I haven't researched that" or "I'd be happy to work with you to understand your concerns". Most of them are well-coached to provide as little as possible and as much non-answer as possible. Thank you Sen. Lee for trying.
at least he didn't say he hasn't thought much on it but when asked a simple question he dodged it as if he was pro dodgeball player. But it did him way too many aaah ummm,s to say that.
I'm not impressed with Mr. Garland's knowledge of the law and specifically the 2nd amendment. I'm disappointed he is unwilling to take a position. With that said, All gun Laws are Infringements.
The Battle Of Athens Tn, Aug. 1 & 2 1946, An American Story. A stolen election in 1946 America caused a 6 hour gun battle at a police station where the stolen ballot boxes were taken of 2-300 local residents & many were veterans of WW 2, against 2-3 dozen cops in the police station. Then the use of dynamite to blow open the steel armored doors of the station brought justice in 1946 America. A 1992 Hallmark movie on this incident is on you tube, titled An American Story. The mayor also stole the 1940, 42 & 44 elections !!!!!
2nd amendment is 100% CLEAR in it's wording.!
Yes. It does not have to be taken to court.
@@sycamorebacker1 True but sadly we have to even though those criminal traitors do not obey any laws including the ( unlawful ) ones they impose on WE the people.!
How can a judge not have, at least out of curiosity not looked into the historical meaning of the 2nd amendment?
He's a liar. That's how.
He said it himself that the Judiciary should help Biden force gun control as much as he can get away with.
He should not be able to be in position of any job of justice office 🤬☠️ He’s not telling the truth about his opinion on 2 Amendment and if he is then he Doesn’t qualify for the position ‼️‼️‼️🤬🤥
and I am no scholar asking this
Deliberately
Question Lee and all Senators failed to ask: What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you not understand?
More BS than the Chicago Stockyards!!
Honestly I would have asked him why our founding fathers saw fit to add "Shall not be infringed" to the second amendment but not the first or any of the other amendments following the second amendment.
Shall not be infringed,if someone can afford a tank,so be it.
@Justin Edwards get a funny bone.
@@bronson6585 a tank HAS a gun...It ISNT a gun itself. It is a VEHICLE of war, much like an 18 wheeler is a Vehicle of Commerce. Even an 18 wheeler needs a special license and training. No regular Joe would get a vehicle of war that is fully operational nor do regular Joe's seek to get such a vehicle. Not only that but such a thing would be severely cost prohibitive thus locking out over 95% of regular people struggling to survive regular life let alone trying to afford a weapon of war.
Oh so he’s anti 2nd amendment. He just doesn’t want to admit it.
Exactly right brother!
@@dannyboy5272 you know with all of his stuttering, you can tell he is another puppet
What has Garland thought deeply about? Uh, Uh, Uh, Uh --NO vote @ Senator Mike Lee
I pray the people such as Mr. Lee takes them all zee way wray alll of them offf and down
That man has not answered a single question asked to him. He was asked his opinion, and he talked about what other people would do. Or he would say he hasn't looked into it. Then WTH job is he interviewing for, if he hasn't even done his homework?
They never answer questions anymore they just dance around the questions ! It's always a dog and pony show . I just finished watching Sen Lee asking the FBI director if they are using information from phone companies to locate who was in DC on Jan 6 and same thing just another dance routine !
@@Toddscomp2 exactly. And what pisses me off is the Senate and congressman who are asking the questions never push for an answer. They just let it go.
If it slithers like a snake and hisses like a snake it must be a _ _ _ _ _? Fill in the blank
@@joseinfante7540 not anymore Jose ! You forgot if the snake want to identify as a eagle than the snake is an eagle ! Get with the program buddy ! 😁
@@Toddscomp2 lol ..good one , its funny to me when they say exept me for who I am when they cant even to the same ... the good Lord doesnt make mistakes but hey what do I know , "there's nothing new Under the Sun " ( history repeats itself ) Saddam and Gomorra . A man isn't free untill his conscience is - San Lee .
Garland is terrible at this. So glad he's not a Justice. Swamp!
I actually thinkk this ah was put into it with the backing of whats his name.......
Skirts all answers, not to be trusted for sure
the whole lot
“Shall not be infringed” doesn’t mean that there should be “some limitations”!
The Second Amendment is already one of the most "regulated" of Amendments. Every read the 1934 NFA? Let me guess you just "feel" that more limitations would help. Answer a question for me. What does "gun show loophole" mean? Ever read the 1968 Gun Control Act? The Heller decision? How many more limitations do you want for a Constitutional Right? Do you have any dangerous books in your home that should be banned? Maybe "Catcher in the Rye"? The Bible or Book of Mormon? For those of us who actually swore an oath to the U.S. Constitution, we understand the sacrifice that upholds our nations principles. For you it's about how you feel. Lemmings march right off the cliff just like you. And remember, just like Mario Cuomo...."What will I do when they come for me?" Think about that. "Bad behavior" created this country you enjoy instead of getting on our knees for the Redcoats. Are you on your knees Danny? I bet you are many times.
Shall NOT be infringed mean EXACTLY what it says! That it shall NOT be hampered in ANY WAY!
@@nomadjeff1922 I think you woefully misunderstood what I was saying. Mike Lee was agreeing that some limitations are prudent , while I was trying to hammer home that shall not be infringed means don’t fuck with it in anyway. I guarantee that the only time you will see me on my knees is on the final judgment day. I will stand and fight to the bloody end for my freedom and the future of my children. I hate this tyranny so much and stand ready to be counted among the resistance. Do you? Will you lay down YOUR life for the liberty of our children??? It’s easy to opine here, what happens when you’re face to face with these goons? I hope and believe that you will stand with me.
Actually it does
Judge Garland used the word "entitled" when referring to who should or should not have arms rights. Natural rights such as the right to self-defense descend from nature and God and are not government entitlements. The Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution recognized some pre-existing historical and natural rights that existed without and before the Constitution and which were not created by it. None of those natural rights can be entitlements. A public servant who does not understand this difference is not fit to serve.
Thank you Senator Lee. You are my favorite Senator, followed by Dr. Paul and somewhere in the distance Senators Cruz and Rubio, for your defense of the Constitution as written.
I am dismayed that you may perhaps be the only Senator who truly supports and defends the Constitution as written.
*Loanword* then I guess the 2nd Amendment doesn't really matter then. Just use the 9th Amendment.
@@jetcitysinatra7300 Yes, the 9th also applies, as does the 10th.
@@LoanwordEggcorn But no one uses these to protect their right to own a gun. If people think their 2nd amendment is under siege then use the 9th amendment. It is supposed to protect all of our rights that are not written down . . .
@@jetcitysinatra7300 Agree 100%, but 9th and 10th amendment lawsuits are far more general. Since we have a 2nd amendment, and it's more specific, it applies first. Please note: I agree with you.
@@LoanwordEggcorn We, up until the 1970's no one had the right to privacy but the 9th amendment was used and the court granted Privacy an actual Right. The more it gets used the more it will be accepted as a way to protect our rights. . . Just sayin. If the courts start to apply the 2nd amendment as it was meant to be taken then we will still have the 9th amendment. . .
Would you say “ evasive” ?
I'm not buying it somethings off with him on his 2a policy define entitled to a firearm when it's a right not an entitlement
There are lots of things that I don’t care for with Garland but the 1st listed definition of entitlement literally means a right to something by law or contract. So by using entitlement he has said it is a right by law. Do I trust he means what he says? Not necessarily but entitlement in this context is a correct term.
Who was the Judge the signed off those fisa's .... They guy that was picked to be the next AG
Every Individual has a Right to Self Defense.
Against tyranny especially! That’s what the second amendment specifically was written to guard against!
Ahh The Sgt. Shultz response to every question, very interesting!
I wish the courts would view the election "irregularities" on the merits rather than procedurally shut it down!
For a judge he (it) sure has alot of AH's and UH's when (it) he speaks . When it becomes AG, it will have no hesitation with it's pen when it comes to the 2A .!
Was he scared of breaking him with the China doll questions? Not an entitlement it is a law biding citizens right. Read it again Sam, Sam I am
Does he have an opinion or thought on anything? I am not a judge and I understand the meaning of 'Shall NOT be infringed". I realize that you can't (meaning should NOT be allowed) do a search and seizure (on anything) without a warrant. What a tool. He would have been great in Nazi Germany. Blindly followed orders to a T.
I observe from this interview a salient code switch when answering questions regarding passed decisions as a jurist compared to opinions of policy as a bureaucrat.
This individual needs to be taken out of any position that would allow him to be a judge. What part of "shall not be infringed" doesn't he understand?
Is the constitution not clear enough for our government to understand?!
The govt doesnt know the difference between a pole or a hole, let alone the duity of posterity the constitution demands of them. Goldfish memory glub glub
I'm so glad I live in a constitutional carry state. No permit needed to open or conceal carry!!
he can remove that title of honorable from the front of his name!
Its obvious merrick garland cares not for what America is and means and stands for. As someone who is educated enough to have read most of our founding documents, its history, it's importance, and the sacrifices made for it and then refuse to embrace it. He absolutely disgusts me with his cold refusal to acknowledge what he is and believes. We know he can't because views would b a shock to everyone that loves n their heart, the red white and blue. His disagreement and disdain for our American ideals is very dangerous and frankly sad. That someone can know about this country and the glorious potentials and turn from it, while being n a position of authority, is of grave concern for every single U.S. citizen. I'm flabbergasted as to why people who would drag us all to ruin r able to get support from the public at all.
what the hell would judges know about the law anymore!?! they just do what their dem overlords tell them to do!
I think before these committees meet again, they should establish a rule for YES or NO answers only. After which, an explanation to the YES or NO answer can be stated. This "Judge" avoids answering the questions by muttering nonsense as well as hiding behind elected officials by repeating their answers. This guy has no backbone, he may have a mountain of experience, but in this room, it amounts to nothing..
Senator Mike Lee
War blow
ANY judge OR official that seeks to deny or reject our God given rights granted in 1791 pertaining to our American Constitutional to us as American citizens needs to be disbarred and imprisoned .
The 2A was written and debated and accepted as it now stands to STOP all issues relating to it that are such a big issue at this time. In other words: KEEP, HONOR, RESPECT, AND DEFEND OUT CONSTITUTION- or GET OUT OF OFFICE.
Has he answered anything definitively? I have yet to see a clear answer. And if that is normal for these hearings how does it help anyone to make a decision on the merits of a candidate?
Garland is answering these questions as if it’s a Supreme Court nominee hearing instead of a person about to run the largest law enforcement agency that has prosecutorial powers. Considering his answers it appears he will look at all existing court cases and craft policies around loopholes he discovered. President Silver Alert said he wasn’t going to politicize the DOJ yet Garland keeps stating he’s going to pursue the Biden agenda. That hardly sounds apolitical.
@@deeinfl5600 Agree 100%, but in a perverse sense Garland is being honest in admitting that he will be political.
if the current era is not "your" era that you are studied and versed in, then you are no longer relevant or applicable to the position at hand.
NO, THERE IS NO RIGHT UNDER THE CONSTITUTION, ESPECIALLY THE 2A THAT IS SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS! NO WHERE IN THE CONSTITUTION SAYS THAT!
" That the law Allows??? " ROOM under the constitution??? These guys are an imminent danger to our country.!!
Watching these cabinet picks from the old guard is like watching your favorite fighter try to fight in their 50s. Theyre all obviously too cognitively declined to be a Walmart greeter much less run the countrys DOJ.
NOBODY can answer a simple question with a Yes or No and Always comes with a Time Burning repeat of gratuity and I am Sick of It. Of course I'm Late to this party, is this Bagel on Our SCOTUS, I can't seem to find a clear answer?
Millions of Americans know the meaning of the second amendment. It"shall not be infringed" PERIOD!! I hope that we will all stand for America when the time comes.
You can’t go against the 2nd amendment without going against the highest law-The Constitution!
As written not how you feel! Maybe ask the same about other rights to put him on the spot. The time I looked the second amendment is the only one that states, shall not be infringed. And is the one right the tyrants are infringing on constantly! 18 U.S.C. 241 & 242 should be enforced moving forward. 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
The "LAW" says shall not be infringed! If you support the "LAW" keep that in mind!
why cant this guy give a real answer
I believe it says in the constitution to protect ourselves from Tierney of the government
Quite a different attitude to questioning Judge Garland to when he questioned the slime ball Bill Barr
MAKE. HELLER STAND THIS MAN DOES NOT DESERVE TO BE CONFIRMED. ALREADY GOING AGAINST THE OUTH TO STAND FOR THE CONSTITUTION
How about the part that says " A well regulated militia being necessary to a free state"! Come on people they are saying it without saying it . Form and regulate or we are going to lose our Republic.
This corrupt system wont be fixed from the top down. It needs to be disregarded from the bottom up.
Lol this Judge dances around all the questions. 🤔
Here we go again! Circle Jerk and more circle Jerk!
Garland's opinion on the 2nd Amendment is whatever Biden's opinion is.
david grg117 He needs to be answering based on the rule of law not what Biden or anyone else wants. Totally unacceptable.
I am curious why does the supreme court and other courts fail to recognize , "shall not be infringed upon", and immediately say you can restrict and control? Shall not be infringed???
Senator Mike Lee
Brun in hell is comeing
Its frustrating listening to non-answer answers! What's the point???
For a judge, he sure says plenty of ums, uhs, & and uhs & and ums....
Any gun does not fire itself it needs the action of another to press the trigger. That person needs to be accountable.
It’s about time the Construction is considered, in this situation! It’s been laying on their desks for hundreds of years and the Holy Bible is in every room in every hotel and motel in this beautiful republic of The United States of America!
The only time they follow the law is if it fits their agenda and the rest are ignored. Fire all the ones tge rank and file say are bad
Thank God he is not on the Supreme Court😮
I don't trust Judge Garland.
Differently an anti gun judge
I'm disappointed that Lee let him slide on the fact that Garland hadn't studied the history of the 2nd Amendment since he wants to be the AG. Also disappointed he didn't press him for an answer about whether he believes in banning certain types of firearms. That one was a total non-answer. He should have also pressed the liability issue in drawing comparisons with any other legal product sold in the U.S. Those were no-brainer questions that deserved a decisive answer.
That's like holding Ford or Chevrolet,or any other auto manufacturer, accountable for every fatalities to drunk drivers! This is insanity!
"where there is room under the law for the president's policies to be pursued, I think the president is entitled to pursue them" meaning yes, he's going after your AR-15
All I heard was I'll have to Circle back to you on that
ENTITLED IS NOT OUR 2ND AMENDMENT. OUR SECOND AMENDMENT IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!
You know what would be amazing?. Id be blown away If any one of these nominees could just once, give a straight forward answer to the question that they are asked. It should be an automatic disqualification for any nominee to dance around they way they have been the passed few days..
Senator Mike Lee
Blow u p
Who cares what the president likes or dislikes are
I would think the #1 question would be "What further law would stop criminals from getting guns?"
A little indication of what the 2nd amendment means.
I like Mike Lee and I'm not even from Utah lol
He said they had to look into the meaning of the second amendment?
Lee, get to the questioning. Most long winded guy in the Senate.
Why the HELL cant these people answer all their questions!!!! If they cant answer simple questions that make them look guilty of some curruption, they should be fired
I'm with Garland just because his son in-law owns a publishing company that provides CRT materials doesn't mean he sent the FBI after parents who didn't want CRT taught to their sons and daughters.
Our Second Amendment rights shall not be infringed
Judge Garland , is so, so ,So vengeful ; for not being a Supreme court Justice . Yet ! If OBama say you as being Fit , you would of already been one .🤔
Judge Garland's nick name is "uh uh um um uh"
You can always tell when garland is lying his mouth is moving
For a judge and his position he knows the Constitution and law. It would be nice for us if he stood up for America and the world instead of the lefts agenda.
If you do not want to carry a firearm for self-protection, that's your right. I do want to carry a firearm for my self-protection, and that's my right. No government representative can tell me I can't. I have the right to carry any type of firearm I want for my protection.
Garland acts nervous as hell because he knows what he wants to do is wrong as hell.
This is 7:49 I'll never get back... I couldn't sit through the whole thing.
Every time I listen to a politician, even a one masquerading as judge, I need a bath.
It's always so disappointing when people brought before the senate don't even state what they personally believe and dodge questions with "I don't have the information in front of me" or "I haven't researched that" or "I'd be happy to work with you to understand your concerns". Most of them are well-coached to provide as little as possible and as much non-answer as possible. Thank you Sen. Lee for trying.
Who brought Merrick back? Ugh
Be grateful that Garland isn’t on the Supreme Court for a lifetime appointment. As AG he may last 4 years.
Biden. Biden is a principal author of Senate gun bans for many decades.
I believe it was....none other than......O'SAMA O'BAMA.....⌛......next......
at least he didn't say he hasn't thought much on it but when asked a simple question he dodged it as if he was pro dodgeball player. But it did him way too many aaah ummm,s to say that.
The first minute is rambling by Lee. That's wasted time.
that was just useless babbling.
allow lulu winke to answer this question for ya judge as well: yes sir [scorpian} add him to Hillary list of 's
Judge Garland bound to become a name to remember 😇
I'm not impressed with Mr. Garland's knowledge of the law and specifically the 2nd amendment. I'm disappointed he is unwilling to take a position. With that said, All gun Laws are Infringements.
2:06 - Just curious how much $ taxpayers are paying for those mini bottles of water.
5:08 - "Or for whatever reason..." Bad choice of words, bud.
Never a dead straight answer on anything.
All the reasons that you shouldn't be on this committee! Sen.Lee!
I am not german; but, as the language presents itself to me
vee zell...english not too great either
Lip service , tell em what they want to hear
send all those lying judges to a reality show on EPSTEIN ISLAND people, who needs them, they are dangerous, biased ,political,
Desperately trying to avoid answering questions.
The Battle Of Athens Tn, Aug. 1 & 2 1946, An American Story. A stolen election in 1946 America caused a 6 hour gun battle at a police station where the stolen ballot boxes were taken of 2-300 local residents & many were veterans of WW 2, against 2-3 dozen cops in the police station. Then the use of dynamite to blow open the steel armored doors of the station brought justice in 1946 America. A 1992 Hallmark movie on this incident is on you tube, titled An American Story. The mayor also stole the 1940, 42 & 44 elections !!!!!
avoids every question.
What is freedom or civil rights ? How does it feel
I, I, I, I, I, um....