There is some truth to it. I mean it can already be proven J-20 is less stealthier. Their is a 3rd party radar scattering CAD simulation done on Aircraft 101. Without RAM coatings, they compared all 3 F-35, J-20, and Su-57 low observable LO characteristics through their shapes/geometry alone. Data is taken from basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress In a 20x20deg frontal aspect, "J-20 RCS is higher than F-35A RCS through the frequency range (approximately 3.5 times in X-band, 1.5 times in VHF band), it still has much better RCS characteristic when compared to Su-57.” This mean even with the same RAM coatings used on the F-35, J-20 much more Su-57 can’t make up the difference in total RCS reduction given their LO properties/geometry. So F-35 definitely has the “first look, first shoot, first kill” in beyond visual range BVR. And with F-35s closing on J-20 and observing it near Japan. With both Pacific Air Force (PACAF) head Gen. Wilsbach and US Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Brown assessment as “It’s not anything to lose a lot of sleep over”. It’s not up to par. In fact they were more impressed with the pilot’s flying skill than the aircraft itself. So the most probable scenario if a radar can detect F-35 at 10km, the same radar can detect J-20 at 20+km, while 4th gen platforms at 40 - 60km. Same goes for J-35. Though they've copied F-35's geometry, their is still a substantial difference in terms of RAM given the assessment assuming the same RAM were used on both J-20 and J-35. So if a more powerful radar can detect F-35 at 100km, it can detect both J-20 and J-35 at 200+km, and 4th gens at 400+km.
I disagree, it might seem like a lot of information that really makes the J35 seem at a major disadvantage (Which it is). He did it in a fair in his assessment. If you listened to the end if it got into the merge (which it never will) it will probably be a closer fight. That being said the Aim 9X is particularly nasty at tracking. Paired with the aim 174b as a fox 3 I think the range will be better too. All in all its a good jet but it's more like a 4th gen fighter with 5th generation maneuverability minus stealth.
J-35 has a top speed of 2.35 mach, rmax range 3500km and combat radius 1300 km and much better radar. F- 35 has a mach 1.6.top speed and a comat radius of 900 km35. F-35 is totally outclassed by J-35
@@oberstleutnant787 it is a missile truck. Meaning of great big heavy Interceptor meant for dragging great big missiles up into the air . It can't turn and therefore is dead in the dog fight F-35 will completely outclass it the terrible radar in Chinese planes will have a hard time picking up AF 35 then throw in all the technological problems with high stress airplanes China has had a hard time making anything run for very long
The video does make sense, but this prediction is still very loose, and it also implies that China has not developed certain similar technologies. As far as I know, China already has helmet-mounted displays on its J15 aircraft, and has demonstrated its capabilities at multiple air shows. Furthermore, China is an important major producer and processor of radar raw materials. Including gallium for manufacturing phased array radar, under this premise, is it a bit arrogant to think that China's information transmission and intelligent technology are worse than the F35? Mosaic tactics can indeed be included in its settings, but the premise becomes a multi-machine confrontation rather than a 1v1 confrontation. Considering these points, one weakness of the F35 has not been mentioned, that is, its engine is based on the F119's expanded duct. A problem that cannot be ignored is that this larger duct makes it more difficult to cruise at supersonic speeds for a long time. . Although China's dual-engine idea has its own stability, the most fundamental purpose is to ensure that it can carry out long-term supersonic cruise to cover its vast territory. Wouldn't it be a bit too arrogant to ignore these points and simply discuss whether it is a copy of the F35? After all, PLAN's needs are different from USN's.
china has very good technology because its been able to steal it. certainly not a bad military tactic, but lets keep the engineering credit where its due.
@runxipang-ld5xr If you are going to be biased and disingenuous, then why bother posting? Everyone knows that China's entire J/stealth program started from intelligence gleamed from the US defense contractors. Down to their exact shape, they are a virtual copy of the American F-22 and F-36 programs. Don't forget the F-22 was actually began in the early 1990s and the first platform emerged in the early 2000s. The F-35 began on the drawing board at the beginning of the 2000s also. So, basically China is chasing technology that is almost TWO DECADES old, and you think they are on par with US jets. We're already testing 6 Gen fighters for Christ's sake!!!
Americans are always arrogant like that. Even just talking about the photos, i have seen so many F-35 and F-22 photos where the coating is cracked and almost rusted to a point where the coating looks 30 years old - obviously affecting its quality.
@@MS-wz9jm Considering the amount of time US fighters spend getting near continuous inspections and maintenance, I think you're lying. The whole purpose of the advantage that these fighters have is in part due to the high polymer coatings on them. Why would the US allow this to degrade to that point and take away the stealth?
“All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.” ― Sun tzu, The Art of War
I am chinese,to be honestly, I thought the j35 would strong as well as f35.the earliest news that I watched about j35 before 10years ago,it’s quite been a long while ,and it must be improved a lot in decade.Eventually ，I hope one day the countries gonna be together and there’s one country called Earth finally.(sorry for my wrong grammar,I am hard learning )
j35 is impressive although it isn't fully developed yet. Also if we compare it to 2009 f35 with hundreds of issues so vital that f35 doesn't even need a challenge to crash.
@@abbasahmad5643 emm,if the max said truthfully the j35 is copy of f35,and I would say they have same performance,if not,I will choose the f35 is better without doubt.Because I realized the distance of military technology and industry between China and America.
This is not up to speculation China's Material science, tech and engine design and engineering is decades behind the US and in perpetual catch up . not a single leap frogging always behind. Even copying the damn aircraft designation. China is only good at making props and propaganda.
There will never be a dogfight between these two planes because the F-35 would never be able to catch up to the J-35 which is faster, has longer range, and has longer range AAM.
Shocked to see an ex F15 pilot with so many misinfo 1. There is no PL14, only PL15 2. PLA doesn’t equip any JF17 3. There is no J17 only J16 😂 4. J35’s engine is not stealthy design , but neither’s F35’s F135 engine 5. F35 has better thrust to weight ratio because it’s smaller??? Come on. Check your math and logic, it’s 2 engines vs 1!
The F-35 has a higher thrust to weight ratio because it weighs less, and the single F135 engine it has weighs less and produces more thrust than the 2 WS-13 engines on the J35. The F-35 does in fact have stealthy engines, the sawtooth nozzles reduce RCS and so do the S-duct inlets. The latest J35 protodypes also seem to have sawtooth nozzles, however.
@@sdfopsdmsdofjmp7863J35 does not use WS13 bro, some proto use WS13E, mass production uses WS19. Also, I don't count sawtooth nozzles as stealthy design for both since it is fairly easy to achieve. BTW, F35 does not use S-duct inlet.
@@olderchin1558 Well yes obviously but you can still try to mask the intake, nozzles and and turbine blades as much as possible, even on a low bypass engine. Yes they will have a huge Infrared signature, but at least the radar signature for a certain frequency band will be low if you do it right.
@@sdfopsdmsdofjmp7863 You mean the long intake tract, reduced straight edges and sawtooth exhaust nozzle. I think you see physically all the F35, J35, J20 employ the same design elements. (Every single wannabe stealth fighter in the world have the same design elements, it is not a secret) The latest J20 and J35 all have sawtooth exhaust, supposedly using the WS10C or WS15 and WS19 respectively. And all uses diverterless intake with the same similarly intake design. All 3 engines will support super cruise. The F35 is likely to have coolest engine, it has a huge diameter body and exhaust, but suffers from low max speed, lower climb rate and max ceiling. Which is probably why some analyst calls it porky, is a less effective WVR fighter. Our hotshot pilot isn't really making a serious comparison, he is just having a bit of fun stirring up discussion.
I dont think the J35 is multirole at all, its purpose built as a carrier stealth fighter for fleet air defense and all indications is the original J31 has been cancelled to focus solely on the J35. Antiship and land attack roles will be delegated to J15s and drones. mostly using standoff weapons With two engines, the J35 actually produces noticably more thrust than the F35 and thats with interim engines. the actual final engine (WS19) will give the J35 significantly more thrust than the F35. The reason why china built a twin engine design was because at the time when the J31 first came out china was nowhere near a 5th gen high thrust turbofan, whereas today the WS15 exists. But its far too late in the development cycle to make radical changes to the airframe. Chinese engines are reliable enough that J10s have been operating in large numbers with domestically produced WS10s for over a decade now.
Man, most of your opinions are based on guesses. You are right that things are evolving in both the US and China. China appears to be more advanced in networking at least in civil applications. Huawei is far more advanced than any Western company. Why should we believe the US would be more advanced in military networks?
You know how China always has to copy old American designs for everything? It’s because America is more advanced in everything. The good news for China is that the US will continue to dominate in every aspect so China will be able to copy more and more advanced things for years to come. Imagine how pitiful China is that Taiwan laughs in the face of its military 😂😂😂 Good luck, Winnie the Pooh 😊
Highly disagree. Huawei is NOT more advanced on their own without foreign components. Beyond that, a combination of massive govt subsidies and R&D savings from simply stealing technology instead of developing it are the REAL "advantages" that the US doesn't have.
You forgot to mention that the way the targeting networking allows AIM120 and AIM260s to be launched from F15, F16 and F18s and directed by the multiple F35s guiding them to the best targets including the J-35.
the J35/J20 can do far more than what you described. That's child play for the Chinese. J20 even has a second pilot to control so many functions. Nonsense the J35 stealth is as stealth as the F35 and using Chinese avionics that are superior to US will be a more than a contest for the F35.
Here is some latest spec on the J20. No one should be surprised that the latest J20s are a direct rival of the like of F35 and F22. Due to its recentness in technology advancement and deployment, J20s are in some way superior to their US counterparts. For instance, it has 6 electro-optic distributed aperture system (EODAS) that, coupled with the latest helmet-mounted display (HMD), gives the pilot full situational awareness including combat information. In 2022, it tested flight the latest WS-15 engines, which are said to be in mass production from late 2023 onward. The latest engine variant will give J20 supercruise, thrust-vectoring, and flight maneuverability that are at least at par with F22. Furthermore, its latest J20S variant, the world's first twin-seated stealth fighter, will give China a remarkable edge over any of its rival. The second pilot can focus on airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) as well as avionics and networking capabilities, allowing J20s as the command post co-ordinating joint mission with the like of J16s and unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs). Arguably, J20 is a 5.5 generation fighter jet, as compared to the 5th generation jets of F35 and the older F22.
All chinese engines are crap. poor copies of Russian designs. infact CHINA STILL IMPORTS RUSSIAN JET ENGINES IN 2024 this proves once and for all that all these claims are 100% disprovable junk. The PLA DOES NOT HAVE CONFIDENCE IN THEIR OWN HARWARE
@@ramonpunsalang3397 that's cool that our guys have so much of an upper head to get them home and that's what we all prey for is getting our men and women home and to prevent a war so they don't have too go anywhere. 🙏💪💪🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
😂Americans and westerner s always say the same old thing battle tested like dude againts whom your army is Battle tested??Afgan farmers?Or Libiyajs Who had Aks and Nothing else besides few rpgs😂
And both counts will go to American pilot advantage virtually every time. Nobody trains more than American pilots, and many have seen combat. No Chinese pilot alive and active has ever seen real air combat.
Yeah, he kept saying that the F-35s wouldn't be detectable--which as I understand it is categorically incorrect. Amazing a "pilot" would not understand this
Since China keeps everything secret about their stealth 5th generation jets, how do you know about the J-35/J-20 radar/maneuver capabilities? How do you know what Chinese pilots can or can't do? The art of war: Rule #1: DO NOT underestimate your enemy. Rule #2: DO NOT forget Rule #1.
One thing for sure.......the Chinese Pilots can speak Chinese with ease, most if not all of our Pilots cannot do so! This is very important if our Piolts wish to order Chinese food!
I really enjoy your videos but one point I think you should bring up is pilots training. I feel even if in a lesser capable jet the pilot can and will make the difference
Flop 35 was designed after cold war, where US is the sole superpower, Flop 35 design to penetrate with higher payload, J35 is design to counter US fleet and dog fight, lower payload but faster and more agile to put flop 22 and Flop 35 into pieces
Dogfights almost never happen in modern warfare. Also the f22’s engines produce 35,000 lbs of thrust whereas the j31 only produces 22,000 lbs of thrust from its engines.
I don't think anyone outside of the Chinese military knows what the actual capabilities of the J-35 are - until (and if) they decide on foreign sales. A challenge with the F-35 program has to be the number of developmental and operational peers. With 17 countries participating in the program, it's got to be leaking like a sieve. Wouldn't be surprising at all if China has continuing access to current engineering plans, including the good stuff, like RAM, sensor, fusion and flight software. Count them in as a silent partner, however unwelcomed.
The US no longer has any interest in staying in front of China. We are witnessing the voluntary and intentional handing over of world power. Outright treason has been committed by the US government, if you actually still believe we are an independent government as opposed to the reality of the fact we are just a member that follows orders from the world government that has been calling the shots for a very long time.
Running gag: China is the problematic student who didn’t pay tuition but sneaks into US military class anyways. The whole class knows that the China isn’t on good terms with the teacher, but most didn’t realize that the two shared a love hate relationship and that China is a secretly an admirer. “I-It’s not like I want to copy and surpass you or anything, b-Baka!”
You're potentially correct, but there's copying and then there's the ability to manufacturing... Can they match the precision manufacturing from the west with the close tolerances involved in each?
@@danielvorster5773 where do you think the PC or phone you're viewing this YT video was manufactured? Never backhandedly dismiss an adversary. That's how you get your ass handed to you on a platter. The absolute worst mistake we can make is to underestimate China.
@@RobertLeeAtYT agree that we should never underestimate an adversary... But China doesn't manufacture all the components of modern tech. They don't make cutting edge chips, they can't make their own reliable motor vehicles. They're good at assembling alot of things but making something as precise as a stealth jet on par with a US manufactured one or a jet engine? I highly doubt it.. but again I agree with you, better assume they can do everything they say they can and overprepare rather than get caught with your pants down
Correct me if I am wrong. Any plan doesn't completely vanish in the sky with stealth tech. Except if they fly in radar dead zone. So the F35 wont be roaming free anytime you like to do so. 8:15 Low frequency radar can detect your general location. Most probable scenario would be, you would detect the general position of the enemy stealth jet and you go confront them. Maybe that's why china stealth fighter has low front radar cross section. You get there where the enemy is before the enemy could lock missiles beyond the visual range on you and once you meet the enemy and its a dog fight battle.
F-35 has only one engine. Many F-35s crashed because of engine failed. Any electronics systems can be jamed. So the F-35 can be binded in the real fIght by Chinese AI electronics warfare !
I'd like to add: In the merge, the F-35 wouldn't even need to point its nose at the J-35. The advanced helmet enables the pilot to target enemies behind the jet with AIM-9Xs, which are more than capable of doing a 180 turn with their thrust vectoring.
The Chinese are not competing with the US, they just have to be good enough to establish air superiority over Taiwan. The Chines could give a rat's ass about the US almighty fighters. They just have to be good enough to establish air superiority over Taiwan's air force. The US will not risk a military intervention when that happens. The danger of escalation into nuclear war is too great. The TRA does not provide for direct military intervention and will not risk a nuclear war to save Taiwan. (The TRA is the Taiwan Relations Act. It says we will support Taiwan's efforts to defend itself and this would likely be with arms and munitions, but the Chinese navy will control the seas around Taiwan and while the US may use its ship born radars to try to detect the J-35 and J-20 but since Taiwan is only 7 minutes from the Chinese mainland, the air war will be over the day it starts.) In other words, it would be like the war between the Russians and the Ukrainians. The Marines might fight because they can be put ashore before the war starts but once they are ashore, they have to consider that they will be unsupported. Remeber, China considers Taiwan part of its territory, and will say that ships that enter into its waters without its permission will be fired on. Again, the US won't risk that. If they do anything, they will put as many Marines on the island as possible before the war starts. The Marines decided to give up their tanks three years ago, and part of that is probably because they knew they would not get support if they ever had to help in the defense of Taiwan.
As a Canadian I am so sick of the perpetual whining and glorification of the Avro Arrow . It is dead and gone long ago. It is a perfect example of how our country never supports its military and how we can’t run a hot dog stand without screwing it up. We are a country with more natural resources than every other on the planet with the exception of Russia yet we can’t even get those goods to market let alone develop cutting edge military technology and market it. There are plenty of documentaries on that romanticized dinosaur that the Canadian aviation public still fauns over.
It is about the pilot and not the fighter jet. When was the last time a chinese fighter pilot on board a chinese fighter jet been in actual combat using its weapons system?
The fact is that American never truly won any war against Korea and Vietnam which Chinese helped fighting against the American when American military gears were far more advanced than the rivals. Winning a battle involves lots of different factors, but not limited a fighter jet alone, and yet, the narrator's opinion is merely a hypothesis based on limited knowledge of rival's jet and history of battles between Chinese and American. But one thing I'm sure, he would loose any battle if he underestimates on rivals
Funny video CN not enough confident to use only one engine 😂😂. US trying to cut cost every corner that they forced it ally to buy some to cover the cost. The J35 spec released recently on social media is far exceeding of the F35 and cheaper...
Surprisingly, this person with special abilities can judge the effectiveness of the stealth coating with the naked eye. In addition, stealth mainly relies on geometric configuration, and functional materials are just the icing on the cake.
Man your self thumping and level of analysis really exposes the competency of the modern generation of US fighter pilots. Chuck Yeager would be so embarrassed from the likes of you.
What about Turkish Kaan and Korean KF 21 are they also copy I don't think so all the 5th generation look similar because you are making stealthy design.
I think you’re wrong when it comes to the reason why they decided to do a double engine set up look at the J 10 it is a single engine fighter but I think the reason is because they don’t have an engine equivalent of the F 35 engine so it would cost less money and take less time to use existing engines
I believe the J-10 (and every Chinese plane before J-20 and J-35) use Russian engines or copies; while the J-20 (I think) and the J-35 use Chinese-designed/developed engines. These engines are weak, unreliable, dirty burning, and underpowered. So they really do need two of them.
@Barefoot433 You don't make sense 😒, if those engines were weak then why not use the Russian derivatives? Like the WS-10C .....I believe the move to indigenous engines means that they are at least on part with the Russian in terms of power... remember that those "Russ1an " engines are made in China free from Ruski intervention. So why not use the powerful engines they already have? Think again bro
@@brownguy9135 they use double engines because they don’t have an engine as powerful as the F 35 engine and it’s cheaper and faster than developing that engine
The helmet coupled to external imaging sensors is also done in the apache. So it basically had been done before. Its also pretty damn impressive in the apache.
How are you so sure they are using these blue prints anyway. Almost all these 5th generation fighters being planned r not looking too different to each other to me, honestly
What’s the point of having a plane that’s so much more expensive including maintenance? Remember most of the time these planes will not be used as designed!
Biggest joke i keep reading over the internet by americans like this guy (propaganda spreader) is that american weapons and systems stats always show the worst case statistic while everyone elses show overblown statistics 😂😂😂
To call it 4.5 th gen is wrong because Rafale and Gripen E are 4.5gen and they have no stealth and they stole alot from the F35 . Of course F35 is better when the US has a giant budget but pilots and tactics are also important.
F-4, F-14 & F/A-18 are all twin engined jets. There are a number of reasons why Fleet Air Arms prefer twin engines, if one engine takes damage the jet may be able to still make it home...TBH only the MI6, CIA and the KGB will the knowledge to know the capability
J31 is a difficult aircraft because the Plaa decision to fund the J20. surpise J31 is still keep going. The plaa idealogy is long range and heavy weigh fighters because of the second chains of islands strategy. The first islands chain are secured it long ago. china knows that if America carriers or submarines would be way from DF21d, Df26 anti ships hypersonic range. F35 is a troublesome aircraft, too expensives to operate and constantly upgrade, due to aware of chinese system are advancing or over take the America system. I personally think that F35 is too weak and too expensive, too sophiscated. you see chinese jet, even the J20 system can be operated by just a normal pilots, within 1 years of training they are ready. F35 it would take 2years to operate . I like the idea, simple, like ak47 style, anyone can use it within a limit training. just look at the ukrainians train on western weapons, it took so long the war end while they are still training to fly the f16 lol
OK, I get it. Right now the F35 is superior. But don't you think it's only a matter of time that J35 later variants catch up with the F35? just curious.
One thing I learned in all of my 40 some years Chinese are Masters at being knockoff Kings. And from going to Walmart I have faith in one thing that that aircraft is going to last 3 years
Anything the USA Steals it improves on. The F-35 is similar to the Soviets first attempt at V STOL Super Sonic Jets. The US made it work and made it Stealth to boot. 🇺🇸
Have you been paying attention to all of the news stories about people with Chinese surnames, working for US defense companies and/or universities being arrested for espionage?
@@karlbrundage7472 Did you know that Bill Clinton was being investigated for selling secrets to the Chinese when he was President - the Monica and the Cigar was the cover story. Do a deep dive into it although with how the internet is censored these days by the Dems/Libs, good luck on finding an accurate news piece on it.
In a South China Sea situation who's going to be maintaining the f35, how many maintenance staff for how many planes that will be operating, from where, hidden how from chinese missiles? What happens when F-35's stealth coating fades after repeated missions. Will the pilots operate or will they know the stakes have been equalled. If stealth can't be maintained then longer range chinese missiles will hit first. If they're operating in a war zone then aircraft carriers will be bombed and sunk. So how will f35 change the outcome for Taiwan
But if it’s not good at all, what is the point for those people keep investing on a seemingly advanced fighter jet? Shouldn’t it be like being eliminated like Boeing x32, especially when they have something like j20 in service already 🤔
Bro can tell how stealthy a plane's coating is with the naked eye
He can detect Chinese submarines in the Pacific with his ears 😂
Bro couldn't see the plane so of course it gets a A+ for the stealth coating.
What about you? Can you see the plane?
There is some truth to it. I mean it can already be proven J-20 is less stealthier. Their is a 3rd party radar scattering CAD simulation done on Aircraft 101. Without RAM coatings, they compared all 3 F-35, J-20, and Su-57 low observable LO characteristics through their shapes/geometry alone. Data is taken from basicsaboutaerodynamicsandavionics.wordpress
In a 20x20deg frontal aspect, "J-20 RCS is higher than F-35A RCS through the frequency range (approximately 3.5 times in X-band, 1.5 times in VHF band), it still has much better RCS characteristic when compared to Su-57.”
This mean even with the same RAM coatings used on the F-35, J-20 much more Su-57 can’t make up the difference in total RCS reduction given their LO properties/geometry. So F-35 definitely has the “first look, first shoot, first kill” in beyond visual range BVR. And with F-35s closing on J-20 and observing it near Japan. With both Pacific Air Force (PACAF) head Gen. Wilsbach and US Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Brown assessment as “It’s not anything to lose a lot of sleep over”. It’s not up to par. In fact they were more impressed with the pilot’s flying skill than the aircraft itself. So the most probable scenario if a radar can detect F-35 at 10km, the same radar can detect J-20 at 20+km, while 4th gen platforms at 40 - 60km. Same goes for J-35. Though they've copied F-35's geometry, their is still a substantial difference in terms of RAM given the assessment assuming the same RAM were used on both J-20 and J-35. So if a more powerful radar can detect F-35 at 100km, it can detect both J-20 and J-35 at 200+km, and 4th gens at 400+km.
@@spicesmuggler2452 lol
Rule #1 of war: never underestimate your enemy and never overestimate your abilities,
This was mainly self chest thumping.
As are all his videos lets be real.
歼35是中国第一种完全自主研发的重型单座双发隐形舰载战机，采用两台推力12吨的全向矢量涡扇19中型发动机，最大起飞重量高达35吨，载油量超过10吨，最大弹药挂载超过8吨，最大飞行速度2.2马赫，亦能进行超音速巡航，作战半径1350公里，正面最小雷达反射截面积0.01平方米。除了能在平直甲板的福建舰上采用电磁弹射起飞外，还能在辽宁舰和山东舰这两艘现役航母上采用甲板滑跃起飞。美军曾经的重型舰载机F14的最大起飞重量也不过33.7吨，最大弹药挂载不过6.5吨。而美军舰载机主力F35C最大起飞重量不过32吨，载油量是8.9吨，武器挂载是8.16吨，最大飞行速度1.6马赫，作战半径为1240公里，正面最小RCS为0.065平方米。
I disagree, it might seem like a lot of information that really makes the J35 seem at a major disadvantage (Which it is). He did it in a fair in his assessment. If you listened to the end if it got into the merge (which it never will) it will probably be a closer fight. That being said the Aim 9X is particularly nasty at tracking. Paired with the aim 174b as a fox 3 I think the range will be better too. All in all its a good jet but it's more like a 4th gen fighter with 5th generation maneuverability minus stealth.
@@AssassinGT range of missiles means nothing if detection and guidance systems are inferior. No matter what the J-35 is a flying juicy target.
@@Shinobubu fully agree. Plus the J35's engines are very not stealth to begin with.
J-35 has a top speed of 2.35 mach, rmax range 3500km and combat radius 1300 km and much better radar. F- 35 has a mach 1.6.top speed and a comat radius of 900 km35. F-35 is totally outclassed by J-35
You keep telling yourself that. Yes, we all know and appreciate the great products made by China.
@@duanesmith5074 yeah Huawei blows apple out of the water despite sanctions and DJI drones dominate the market.
@@duanesmith5074 since most of our products used made by China, I wouldn't be surprised they outclass F-35 as well. why not?
@@oberstleutnant787 it is a missile truck. Meaning of great big heavy Interceptor meant for dragging great big missiles up into the air . It can't turn and therefore is dead in the dog fight F-35 will completely outclass it the terrible radar in Chinese planes will have a hard time picking up AF 35 then throw in all the technological problems with high stress airplanes China has had a hard time making anything run for very long
@@oberstleutnant787 now if there is an F-22 in the air you won't even know he's here and he'll be shooting you down so fast
The video does make sense, but this prediction is still very loose, and it also implies that China has not developed certain similar technologies. As far as I know, China already has helmet-mounted displays on its J15 aircraft, and has demonstrated its capabilities at multiple air shows. Furthermore, China is an important major producer and processor of radar raw materials. Including gallium for manufacturing phased array radar, under this premise, is it a bit arrogant to think that China's information transmission and intelligent technology are worse than the F35? Mosaic tactics can indeed be included in its settings, but the premise becomes a multi-machine confrontation rather than a 1v1 confrontation. Considering these points, one weakness of the F35 has not been mentioned, that is, its engine is based on the F119's expanded duct. A problem that cannot be ignored is that this larger duct makes it more difficult to cruise at supersonic speeds for a long time. . Although China's dual-engine idea has its own stability, the most fundamental purpose is to ensure that it can carry out long-term supersonic cruise to cover its vast territory. Wouldn't it be a bit too arrogant to ignore these points and simply discuss whether it is a copy of the F35? After all, PLAN's needs are different from USN's.
china has very good technology because its been able to steal it. certainly not a bad military tactic, but lets keep the engineering credit where its due.
If you think this guy as an defence expert then I have a bridge to sell you. He is just catering his loyal audience.
@runxipang-ld5xr If you are going to be biased and disingenuous, then why bother posting? Everyone knows that China's entire J/stealth program started from intelligence gleamed from the US defense contractors. Down to their exact shape, they are a virtual copy of the American F-22 and F-36 programs. Don't forget the F-22 was actually began in the early 1990s and the first platform emerged in the early 2000s. The F-35 began on the drawing board at the beginning of the 2000s also. So, basically China is chasing technology that is almost TWO DECADES old, and you think they are on par with US jets. We're already testing 6 Gen fighters for Christ's sake!!!
Americans are always arrogant like that. Even just talking about the photos, i have seen so many F-35 and F-22 photos where the coating is cracked and almost rusted to a point where the coating looks 30 years old - obviously affecting its quality.
@@MS-wz9jm Considering the amount of time US fighters spend getting near continuous inspections and maintenance, I think you're lying. The whole purpose of the advantage that these fighters have is in part due to the high polymer coatings on them. Why would the US allow this to degrade to that point and take away the stealth?
“All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”
― Sun tzu, The Art of War
I am chinese,to be honestly, I thought the j35 would strong as well as f35.the earliest news that I watched about j35 before 10years ago,it’s quite been a long while ,and it must be improved a lot in decade.Eventually ，I hope one day the countries gonna be together and there’s one country called Earth finally.(sorry for my wrong grammar,I am hard learning )
🇺🇲😁👍you did fine...
As a Gwai Lo (my limited Cantonese) your English is much better than my Chinese...
T
Your English is fine. All good people hope for peace. 😊
j35 is impressive although it isn't fully developed yet. Also if we compare it to 2009 f35 with hundreds of issues so vital that f35 doesn't even need a challenge to crash.
@@abbasahmad5643 emm,if the max said truthfully the j35 is copy of f35,and I would say they have same performance,if not,I will choose the f35 is better without doubt.Because I realized the distance of military technology and industry between China and America.
The fact you have no idea what the details specs are on the J35 (they are not public). Therefore, your conclusions are all personal biases opinions!
歼35是中国第一种完全自主研发的重型单座双发隐形舰载战机，采用两台推力12吨的全向矢量涡扇19中型发动机，最大起飞重量高达35吨，载油量超过10吨，最大弹药挂载超过8吨，最大飞行速度2.2马赫，亦能进行超音速巡航，作战半径1350公里，正面最小雷达反射截面积0.01平方米。除了能在平直甲板的福建舰上采用电磁弹射起飞外，还能在辽宁舰和山东舰这两艘现役航母上采用甲板滑跃起飞。美军曾经的重型舰载机F14的最大起飞重量也不过33.7吨，最大弹药挂载不过6.5吨。而美军舰载机主力F35C最大起飞重量不过32吨，载油量是8.9吨，武器挂载是8.16吨，最大飞行速度1.6马赫，作战半径为1240公里，正面最小RCS为0.065平方米。
Fully agreed, speculation and made up stories.
This is not up to speculation China's Material science, tech and engine design and engineering is decades behind the US and in perpetual catch up . not a single leap frogging always behind. Even copying the damn aircraft designation. China is only good at making props and propaganda.
There will never be a dogfight between these two planes because the F-35 would never be able to catch up to the J-35 which is faster, has longer range, and has longer range AAM.
Shocked to see an ex F15 pilot with so many misinfo
1. There is no PL14, only PL15
2. PLA doesn’t equip any JF17
3. There is no J17 only J16 😂
4. J35’s engine is not stealthy design , but neither’s F35’s F135 engine
5. F35 has better thrust to weight ratio because it’s smaller??? Come on. Check your math and logic, it’s 2 engines vs 1!
The F-35 has a higher thrust to weight ratio because it weighs less, and the single F135 engine it has weighs less and produces more thrust than the 2 WS-13 engines on the J35.
The F-35 does in fact have stealthy engines, the sawtooth nozzles reduce RCS and so do the S-duct inlets. The latest J35 protodypes also seem to have sawtooth nozzles, however.
@@sdfopsdmsdofjmp7863J35 does not use WS13 bro, some proto use WS13E, mass production uses WS19. Also, I don't count sawtooth nozzles as stealthy design for both since it is fairly easy to achieve. BTW, F35 does not use S-duct inlet.
A real stealth engine would the ones with high bypass for cooler exhaust and hidden inside the B2 and B21 with intakes hidden on top of the plane.
@@olderchin1558 Well yes obviously but you can still try to mask the intake, nozzles and and turbine blades as much as possible, even on a low bypass engine. Yes they will have a huge Infrared signature, but at least the radar signature for a certain frequency band will be low if you do it right.
@@sdfopsdmsdofjmp7863 You mean the long intake tract, reduced straight edges and sawtooth exhaust nozzle. I think you see physically all the F35, J35, J20 employ the same design elements. (Every single wannabe stealth fighter in the world have the same design elements, it is not a secret) The latest J20 and J35 all have sawtooth exhaust, supposedly using the WS10C or WS15 and WS19 respectively. And all uses diverterless intake with the same similarly intake design. All 3 engines will support super cruise. The F35 is likely to have coolest engine, it has a huge diameter body and exhaust, but suffers from low max speed, lower climb rate and max ceiling. Which is probably why some analyst calls it porky, is a less effective WVR fighter.
Our hotshot pilot isn't really making a serious comparison, he is just having a bit of fun stirring up discussion.
I dont think the J35 is multirole at all, its purpose built as a carrier stealth fighter for fleet air defense and all indications is the original J31 has been cancelled to focus solely on the J35.
Antiship and land attack roles will be delegated to J15s and drones. mostly using standoff weapons
With two engines, the J35 actually produces noticably more thrust than the F35 and thats with interim engines. the actual final engine (WS19) will give the J35 significantly more thrust than the F35.
The reason why china built a twin engine design was because at the time when the J31 first came out china was nowhere near a 5th gen high thrust turbofan, whereas today the WS15 exists. But its far too late in the development cycle to make radical changes to the airframe.
Chinese engines are reliable enough that J10s have been operating in large numbers with domestically produced WS10s for over a decade now.
当它质疑中国战机的信息化能力的时候就已经没有再多说的必要了。🙃
Thank you, armchair expert.
@@jiajunsun3845 我看到过比他更专业的视频，专门讨论j20的设计特点和各种细节问题，比他泛泛而谈要专业多了，包括很多一般人不考虑的细节问题。当然我也不是专业人士，我就是一个普通人，直觉上这位视频的作者讲的很空洞，我宁肯信更细致讲解的视频。🙃
@@XiaoFeng347哪个视频，发个链接
@@XiaoFeng347关于20的
Man, most of your opinions are based on guesses. You are right that things are evolving in both the US and China. China appears to be more advanced in networking at least in civil applications. Huawei is far more advanced than any Western company. Why should we believe the US would be more advanced in military networks?
Básicamente por que Estados Unidos tiene los chips más avanzados. Qué es la parte central de cualquier maquina militar.
Why wouldn't you believe that? Huawei isn't more advanced either, it's just cheaper.
You know how China always has to copy old American designs for everything? It’s because America is more advanced in everything. The good news for China is that the US will continue to dominate in every aspect so China will be able to copy more and more advanced things for years to come. Imagine how pitiful China is that Taiwan laughs in the face of its military 😂😂😂
Good luck, Winnie the Pooh 😊
Highly disagree. Huawei is NOT more advanced on their own without foreign components. Beyond that, a combination of massive govt subsidies and R&D savings from simply stealing technology instead of developing it are the REAL "advantages" that the US doesn't have.
I think you’re giving China and Huawei a lot of unearned and inflated credit.
We all know that the J-35 Draken is the best fighter ever made.
Eh? A semi copy F-35… I doubt it
@@DS-zl4up I dont think you understand what Im saying here. Im talking the original Draken. Give it search.
@@DS-zl4upthe dorito plane
@@josjas7025I had to Google it up. Saab 35 Draken
You forgot to mention that the way the targeting networking allows AIM120 and AIM260s to be launched from F15, F16 and F18s and directed by the multiple F35s guiding them to the best targets including the J-35.
And the fact that the F-35 doesn't even need to point it's nose at the enemy aircraft to fire.
the J35/J20 can do far more than what you described. That's child play for the Chinese.
J20 even has a second pilot to control so many functions.
Nonsense the J35 stealth is as stealth as the F35 and using Chinese avionics that are superior to US will be a more than a contest for the F35.
But why J35 can't do that?
事实上J35或者J20的最终设计目标都是蜂群战术，自己并不攻击目标，而是由无人僚机来攻击
Here is some latest spec on the J20. No one should be surprised that the latest J20s are a direct rival of the like of F35 and F22. Due to its recentness in technology advancement and deployment, J20s are in some way superior to their US counterparts. For instance, it has 6 electro-optic distributed aperture system (EODAS) that, coupled with the latest helmet-mounted display (HMD), gives the pilot full situational awareness including combat information. In 2022, it tested flight the latest WS-15 engines, which are said to be in mass production from late 2023 onward. The latest engine variant will give J20 supercruise, thrust-vectoring, and flight maneuverability that are at least at par with F22. Furthermore, its latest J20S variant, the world's first twin-seated stealth fighter, will give China a remarkable edge over any of its rival. The second pilot can focus on airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) as well as avionics and networking capabilities, allowing J20s as the command post co-ordinating joint mission with the like of J16s and unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs). Arguably, J20 is a 5.5 generation fighter jet, as compared to the 5th generation jets of F35 and the older F22.
J20 engines are crap.
All chinese engines are crap. poor copies of Russian designs. infact CHINA STILL IMPORTS RUSSIAN JET ENGINES IN 2024 this proves once and for all that all these claims are 100% disprovable junk. The PLA DOES NOT HAVE CONFIDENCE IN THEIR OWN HARWARE
It will come down to pilot's experience and being battle tested.
No it'll be stealth and Tech. The first one locked on will win perhaps not everytime, but most of the time.
Not really. Newbie F-35 pilots routinely beat very experienced Aggressor pilots in DACT. The tech has changed the game.
@@ramonpunsalang3397 that's cool that our guys have so much of an upper head to get them home and that's what we all prey for is getting our men and women home and to prevent a war so they don't have too go anywhere. 🙏💪💪🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
😂Americans and westerner s always say the same old thing battle tested like dude againts whom your army is Battle tested??Afgan farmers?Or Libiyajs Who had Aks and Nothing else besides few rpgs😂
And both counts will go to American pilot advantage virtually every time. Nobody trains more than American pilots, and many have seen combat. No Chinese pilot alive and active has ever seen real air combat.
Isnt it more a question of being able to track a stealth plane vs rather than detecting it ? Meaning you can see it but you cant track or lock it ?
Yeah, he kept saying that the F-35s wouldn't be detectable--which as I understand it is categorically incorrect. Amazing a "pilot" would not understand this
Since China keeps everything secret about their stealth 5th generation jets,
how do you know about the J-35/J-20 radar/maneuver capabilities?
How do you know what Chinese pilots can or can't do?
The art of war:
Rule #1: DO NOT underestimate your enemy.
Rule #2: DO NOT forget Rule #1.
One thing for sure.......the Chinese Pilots can speak Chinese with ease, most if not all of our Pilots cannot do so! This is very important if our Piolts wish to order Chinese food!
Some of these youtuber just go around making up stuff , bet he never even talk to a single Chinese fighter pilot !
if chinas pilots are like China's soldiers than Indias pilots can beat them😅
If Indian pilots like you then Pakistan pilot will beat them in few seconds... @@weilam03
@@weilam03 lol
No wonder China is fast moving ahead on military n other technologies while US is still harping about their old tech.
I really enjoy your videos but one point I think you should bring up is pilots training. I feel even if in a lesser capable jet the pilot can and will make the difference
LoL made a prediction based on ... zero data and patriotism alone.
You act like both of these aircrafts aren't extremely classified, it's going to speculation no matter what. Stop crying.
Fighter pilots have fucking great taste in music.
Flop 35 was designed after cold war, where US is the sole superpower, Flop 35 design to penetrate with higher payload, J35 is design to counter US fleet and dog fight, lower payload but faster and more agile to put flop 22 and Flop 35 into pieces
Dogfights almost never happen in modern warfare. Also the f22’s engines produce 35,000 lbs of thrust whereas the j31 only produces 22,000 lbs of thrust from its engines.
I don't think anyone outside of the Chinese military knows what the actual capabilities of the J-35 are - until (and if) they decide on foreign sales.
A challenge with the F-35 program has to be the number of developmental and operational peers. With 17 countries participating in the program, it's got to be leaking like a sieve. Wouldn't be surprising at all if China has continuing access to current engineering plans, including the good stuff, like RAM, sensor, fusion and flight software. Count them in as a silent partner, however unwelcomed.
The US no longer has any interest in staying in front of China. We are witnessing the voluntary and intentional handing over of world power. Outright treason has been committed by the US government, if you actually still believe we are an independent government as opposed to the reality of the fact we are just a member that follows orders from the world government that has been calling the shots for a very long time.
Running gag:
China is the problematic student who didn’t pay tuition but sneaks into US military class anyways.
The whole class knows that the China isn’t on good terms with the teacher, but most didn’t realize that the two shared a love hate relationship and that China is a secretly an admirer.
“I-It’s not like I want to copy and surpass you or anything, b-Baka!”
You're potentially correct, but there's copying and then there's the ability to manufacturing... Can they match the precision manufacturing from the west with the close tolerances involved in each?
@@danielvorster5773 where do you think the PC or phone you're viewing this YT video was manufactured?
Never backhandedly dismiss an adversary. That's how you get your ass handed to you on a platter. The absolute worst mistake we can make is to underestimate China.
@@RobertLeeAtYT agree that we should never underestimate an adversary... But China doesn't manufacture all the components of modern tech. They don't make cutting edge chips, they can't make their own reliable motor vehicles. They're good at assembling alot of things but making something as precise as a stealth jet on par with a US manufactured one or a jet engine? I highly doubt it.. but again I agree with you, better assume they can do everything they say they can and overprepare rather than get caught with your pants down
Shealth is a hype because any shealth tech is frequency specific If my radar emits frequencies that coating isn't designed to absorb I will detect you
Yes, im pretty sure you figured that out and the guys creating the planes (and armies actually using the planes) know less than you. Pretty smart.
Correct me if I am wrong. Any plan doesn't completely vanish in the sky with stealth tech. Except if they fly in radar dead zone. So the F35 wont be roaming free anytime you like to do so. 8:15 Low frequency radar can detect your general location. Most probable scenario would be, you would detect the general position of the enemy stealth jet and you go confront them. Maybe that's why china stealth fighter has low front radar cross section. You get there where the enemy is before the enemy could lock missiles beyond the visual range on you and once you meet the enemy and its a dog fight battle.
In comparison, J35 performs like a 6th generation and has retired the F35 and it's tumultuous careers
F-35 has only one engine.
Many F-35s crashed because of engine failed.
Any electronics systems can be jamed.
So the F-35 can be binded in the real fIght by Chinese AI electronics warfare !
I'd like to add:
In the merge, the F-35 wouldn't even need to point its nose at the J-35. The advanced helmet enables the pilot to target enemies behind the jet with AIM-9Xs, which are more than capable of doing a 180 turn with their thrust vectoring.
Chinese have similar thing with one third price.
@@zhouanderson8279 with probably less than one third of its reliability.
As much as I love the J35 and new Chinese carrier tech, they're definitely outmatched by the USA.
@@darrenyp and you're calling an F-35 reliable? SMH
The sovjet R73 was the first missile that could turn 180
TY Great content as usual.
The Chinese are not competing with the US, they just have to be good enough to establish air superiority over Taiwan. The Chines could give a rat's ass about the US almighty fighters. They just have to be good enough to establish air superiority over Taiwan's air force. The US will not risk a military intervention when that happens. The danger of escalation into nuclear war is too great. The TRA does not provide for direct military intervention and will not risk a nuclear war to save Taiwan. (The TRA is the Taiwan Relations Act. It says we will support Taiwan's efforts to defend itself and this would likely be with arms and munitions, but the Chinese navy will control the seas around Taiwan and while the US may use its ship born radars to try to detect the J-35 and J-20 but since Taiwan is only 7 minutes from the Chinese mainland, the air war will be over the day it starts.) In other words, it would be like the war between the Russians and the Ukrainians. The Marines might fight because they can be put ashore before the war starts but once they are ashore, they have to consider that they will be unsupported. Remeber, China considers Taiwan part of its territory, and will say that ships that enter into its waters without its permission will be fired on. Again, the US won't risk that. If they do anything, they will put as many Marines on the island as possible before the war starts. The Marines decided to give up their tanks three years ago, and part of that is probably because they knew they would not get support if they ever had to help in the defense of Taiwan.
They may have learned everything they know from us, but the didn't learn everything WE know.
they can improve on your weaknesses
@@dustinchenonly if they know what the weaknesses are.
And there are very few to begin with
so they can copy it but not find any weaknesses? okay @@ObiWanShinobi917
They learned from us but they didn't learn to think for themselves.
@@richhead1999BINGO. All they do is photo copy and produce an inferior product. I'm shocked there are communist sympathizers in here lol.
Would love to see you do a video on the Canadian Avro Arrow Cf 105. An aircraft way ahead of everything in its time!
Love your work!
YES !
As a Canadian I am so sick of the perpetual whining and glorification of the Avro Arrow . It is dead and gone long ago. It is a perfect example of how our country never supports its military and how we can’t run a hot dog stand without screwing it up.
We are a country with more natural resources than every other on the planet with the exception of Russia yet we can’t even get those goods to market let alone develop cutting edge military technology and market it.
There are plenty of documentaries on that romanticized dinosaur that the Canadian aviation public still fauns over.
America forced Canada to destroy it. America still behave this way. No competition.
It is about the pilot and not the fighter jet. When was the last time a chinese fighter pilot on board a chinese fighter jet been in actual combat using its weapons system?
When last was an American in actual combat? Excluding the UFOs 👽
That’s true
USA always invade others while China is busy building their infrastructure for their people’!!!
The fact is that American never truly won any war against Korea and Vietnam which Chinese helped fighting against the American when American military gears were far more advanced than the rivals.
Winning a battle involves lots of different factors, but not limited a fighter jet alone, and yet, the narrator's opinion is merely a hypothesis based on limited knowledge of rival's jet and history of battles between Chinese and American. But one thing I'm sure, he would loose any battle if he underestimates on rivals
The Chinese also makes a watch that looks exactly like a Rolex... but it still ain't a Roles... it's a fake... 🤣
How come when I looked at the thumbnail for this video, I could not tell which one was the F-35 and what one was the Chinese jet?
look at the engines. its easy to tell
@@weilam03 yeah sure.
Overall, the J-35 looks more flat compared to the F-35, and it also has twin engines
Funny video CN not enough confident to use only one engine 😂😂. US trying to cut cost every corner that they forced it ally to buy some to cover the cost. The J35 spec released recently on social media is far exceeding of the F35 and cheaper...
The stelf coting pealfoff I. The rain the plain cracks when you shoot the gun j35:all day
In so many words, nothing is better than the original 🤷🏻♂️
Surprisingly, this person with special abilities can judge the effectiveness of the stealth coating with the naked eye.
In addition, stealth mainly relies on geometric configuration, and functional materials are just the icing on the cake.
Man your self thumping and level of analysis really exposes the competency of the modern generation of US fighter pilots. Chuck Yeager would be so embarrassed from the likes of you.
What about Turkish Kaan and Korean KF 21 are they also copy
I don't think so all the 5th generation look similar because you are making stealthy design.
1 vs 2 engines = totally different aerodynamics.
I think you’re wrong when it comes to the reason why they decided to do a double engine set up look at the J 10 it is a single engine fighter but I think the reason is because they don’t have an engine equivalent of the F 35 engine so it would cost less money and take less time to use existing engines
I think they went for double engines to increase survivability just like the french did with the rafale.
I believe the J-10 (and every Chinese plane before J-20 and J-35) use Russian engines or copies; while the J-20 (I think) and the J-35 use Chinese-designed/developed engines. These engines are weak, unreliable, dirty burning, and underpowered. So they really do need two of them.
@Barefoot433 You don't make sense 😒, if those engines were weak then why not use the Russian derivatives?
Like the WS-10C .....I believe the move to indigenous engines means that they are at least on part with the Russian in terms of power... remember that those "Russ1an " engines are made in China free from Ruski intervention.
So why not use the powerful engines they already have?
Think again bro
@@Barefoot433 the J 10 uses Chinese engines same with the J 11 and the J 16
@@brownguy9135 they use double engines because they don’t have an engine as powerful as the F 35 engine and it’s cheaper and faster than developing that engine
J-35 in everyway a F-22 copy with 93% length and 99% width
US intelligence agencies should be ashamed because China can steal all their secret technologies 😂
歼35是中国第一种完全自主研发的重型单座双发隐形舰载战机，采用两台推力12吨的全向矢量涡扇19中型发动机，最大起飞重量高达35吨，载油量超过10吨，最大弹药挂载超过8吨，最大飞行速度2.2马赫，亦能进行超音速巡航，作战半径1350公里，正面最小雷达反射截面积0.01平方米。除了能在平直甲板的福建舰上采用电磁弹射起飞外，还能在辽宁舰和山东舰这两艘现役航母上采用甲板滑跃起飞。美军曾经的重型舰载机F14的最大起飞重量也不过33.7吨，最大弹药挂载不过6.5吨。而美军舰载机主力F35C最大起飞重量不过32吨，载油量是8.9吨，武器挂载是8.16吨，最大飞行速度1.6马赫，作战半径为1240公里，正面最小RCS为0.065平方米。
The pilot will make the out come every time!
Bro is talking like he built j-35
China copied f35 .
The helmet coupled to external imaging sensors is also done in the apache. So it basically had been done before. Its also pretty damn impressive in the apache.
Even an apache can shoot down junk35 with machine gun lol
We the People have made a poll and found Your Col Robin Olds Mustache is sorely missed.
How are you so sure they are using these blue prints anyway. Almost all these 5th generation fighters being planned r not looking too different to each other to me, honestly
None of American products stand any chance against the Chinese, it is a foregone history witness by everybody day by day.😅
“Is it a actually a fifth generation fighter,well not exactly”😂😂😂
What’s the point of having a plane that’s so much more expensive including maintenance? Remember most of the time these planes will not be used as designed!
As an Indian I'll support china instead of usa
Biggest joke i keep reading over the internet by americans like this guy (propaganda spreader) is that american weapons and systems stats always show the worst case statistic while everyone elses show overblown statistics 😂😂😂
The US needs better R&D to improve the J-35...Not all the R&D gets stolen, maybe.
To call it 4.5 th gen is wrong because Rafale and Gripen E are 4.5gen and they have no stealth and they stole alot from the F35 . Of course F35 is better when the US has a giant budget but pilots and tactics are also important.
歼35是中国第一种完全自主研发的重型单座双发隐形舰载战机，采用两台推力12吨的全向矢量涡扇19中型发动机，最大起飞重量高达35吨，载油量超过10吨，最大弹药挂载超过8吨，最大飞行速度2.2马赫，亦能进行超音速巡航，作战半径1350公里，正面最小雷达反射截面积0.01平方米。除了能在平直甲板的福建舰上采用电磁弹射起飞外，还能在辽宁舰和山东舰这两艘现役航母上采用甲板滑跃起飞。美军曾经的重型舰载机F14的最大起飞重量也不过33.7吨，最大弹药挂载不过6.5吨。而美军舰载机主力F35C最大起飞重量不过32吨，载油量是8.9吨，武器挂载是8.16吨，最大飞行速度1.6马赫，作战半径为1240公里，正面最小RCS为0.065平方米。
Lies. That's not true. You sound like a Monday morning football quarterback. You haven't been even close to the air planes but talking a good game.
Pl15range 500KM & PL17 missle is more than 800KM . nowadays without best AWACS and missles, fighter is useless..
pl15 200km pl17 400km
F-4, F-14 & F/A-18 are all twin engined jets. There are a number of reasons why Fleet Air Arms prefer twin engines, if one engine takes damage the jet may be able to still make it home...TBH only the MI6, CIA and the KGB will the knowledge to know the capability
this is gonna be good.
Now that the true stats are out on the J-35...You may now eat your words...From RCS, engine, radar, weapons to cost ...bested 😳
A good video, thank you; but how did the US manage to let the plans for the F-35 fall into Chinese hands?(!)
I was hoping for this video. Thank you!!
J31 is a difficult aircraft because the Plaa decision to fund the J20. surpise J31 is still keep going. The plaa idealogy is long range and heavy weigh fighters because of the second chains of islands strategy. The first islands chain are secured it long ago. china knows that if America carriers or submarines would be way from DF21d, Df26 anti ships hypersonic range.
F35 is a troublesome aircraft, too expensives to operate and constantly upgrade, due to aware of chinese system are advancing or over take the America system.
I personally think that F35 is too weak and too expensive, too sophiscated. you see chinese jet, even the J20 system can be operated by just a normal pilots, within 1 years of training they are ready. F35 it would take 2years to operate . I like the idea, simple, like ak47 style, anyone can use it within a limit training. just look at the ukrainians train on western weapons, it took so long the war end while they are still training to fly the f16 lol
I have the impression that the survivor ability explanation for a two engine design is far from universally appropriate.
Stop right at 1:30.
3:33 Lmao 😂😂Proceeds to Turn Crash 35 into Subarine In south china zea
the guy is confused in his native language between J and F
OK, I get it. Right now the F35 is superior. But don't you think it's only a matter of time that J35 later variants catch up with the F35? just curious.
歼35是中国第一种完全自主研发的重型单座双发隐形舰载战机，采用两台推力12吨的全向矢量涡扇19中型发动机，最大起飞重量高达35吨，载油量超过10吨，最大弹药挂载超过8吨，最大飞行速度2.2马赫，亦能进行超音速巡航，作战半径1350公里，正面最小雷达反射截面积0.01平方米。除了能在平直甲板的福建舰上采用电磁弹射起飞外，还能在辽宁舰和山东舰这两艘现役航母上采用甲板滑跃起飞。美军曾经的重型舰载机F14的最大起飞重量也不过33.7吨，最大弹药挂载不过6.5吨。而美军舰载机主力F35C最大起飞重量不过32吨，载油量是8.9吨，武器挂载是8.16吨，最大飞行速度1.6马赫，作战半径为1240公里，正面最小RCS为0.065平方米。
One thing I learned in all of my 40 some years Chinese are Masters at being knockoff Kings. And from going to Walmart I have faith in one thing that that aircraft is going to last 3 years
it is impossible to copy aircraft so in the past U.S use to steel tech from Soviet union so china is doing the same thing but still its not copy
Anything the USA Steals it improves on. The F-35 is similar to the Soviets first attempt at V STOL Super Sonic Jets. The US made it work and made it Stealth to boot. 🇺🇸
f35 no.1
Source: trust me bro
a lot of modern jets with the number 35. F-35, J-35, Su-35
It's wild that the Chinese spy network was able to acquire the blueprints for the f-35.
yeah it's called the Clintons. You should look into how the Chinese got the radar system from the Burke Destroyer.
Only basic blueprints. They didn't get everything they needed to make a perfect 1:1 copy. They had to speculate and guess a lot of the design.
Have you been paying attention to all of the news stories about people with Chinese surnames, working for US defense companies and/or universities being arrested for espionage?
@@karlbrundage7472 Did you know that Bill Clinton was being investigated for selling secrets to the Chinese when he was President - the Monica and the Cigar was the cover story. Do a deep dive into it although with how the internet is censored these days by the Dems/Libs, good luck on finding an accurate news piece on it.
@@karlbrundage7472
I seem to recall one big case where the guy was Indian-American and his motive was money.
How about doing a video on the KF-21?
Casually talking about war with China, interesting times indeed.
How good are the pilots themselves? I have a feeling that they only make 50 cents an hour.
No fighter can avoid rider ..
And let's all remember.. its made in china. So should fall apart after the manufacturers warranty runs out.
In a South China Sea situation who's going to be maintaining the f35, how many maintenance staff for how many planes that will be operating, from where, hidden how from chinese missiles? What happens when F-35's stealth coating fades after repeated missions. Will the pilots operate or will they know the stakes have been equalled. If stealth can't be maintained then longer range chinese missiles will hit first. If they're operating in a war zone then aircraft carriers will be bombed and sunk. So how will f35 change the outcome for Taiwan
But if it’s not good at all, what is the point for those people keep investing on a seemingly advanced fighter jet? Shouldn’t it be like being eliminated like Boeing x32, especially when they have something like j20 in service already 🤔
Engine thrust say NNNOOOOOOOOPE.
How f do you know what stef coating
China 🇨🇳 the ultimate world Super Power , love from Pakistan 🇵🇰
How many air to air missiles that a f35 can load internally?
Not a lot but the f18 that are tagging behind are carrying a bunch and the f35 can target and the f18 fire.
歼35是中国第一种完全自主研发的重型单座双发隐形舰载战机，采用两台推力12吨的全向矢量涡扇19中型发动机，最大起飞重量高达35吨，载油量超过10吨，最大弹药挂载超过8吨，最大飞行速度2.2马赫，亦能进行超音速巡航，作战半径1350公里，正面最小雷达反射截面积0.01平方米。除了能在平直甲板的福建舰上采用电磁弹射起飞外，还能在辽宁舰和山东舰这两艘现役航母上采用甲板滑跃起飞。美军曾经的重型舰载机F14的最大起飞重量也不过33.7吨，最大弹药挂载不过6.5吨。而美军舰载机主力F35C最大起飞重量不过32吨，载油量是8.9吨，武器挂载是8.16吨，最大飞行速度1.6马赫，作战半径为1240公里，正面最小RCS为0.065平方米。
According to you, China is doing things that make no sense. But is it possible?😁
Stop the accusation !!!
pride,prejudice
One to One Dog fight than superior fighter gonna be powerful
这两架飞机的定位完全不一样😂没有可比性，j35并不能完全和f35比性能。但是现代战争根本不看单体机能。
F35 is too fat, i calls F35 Flying Pork chop😅 , F35 can fly super cruise only short distance.
“If the F35 is Fat Amy, the F22 is the Zodiac Killer”
F35 riddled with problems can't do half the multiple roll capabilities it's was made to do
F35 not really tested in real combat Israel that's it
Intuition is everything whe a new tech invented. Any human race can have that not just americans.
Is that why the J35 has two engines and the F35 has only one?? 😂 Brainwashed Haters.
Lockheed can't be beat. Creme De La Creme.
Find the F-35 ...
No problem HENSOLDT Twinvis Passive Radar
J35 is a piece of craft it's sub standard more quantity low quality