I like Dr, Graham's statement that he believed in the divine inspiration of Scripture but not in the divine inspiration of any given English translation of Scripture. Unless you are fluent in Greek for the New Testament and Hebrew for the Old Testament you need to compare at least four different English translations, preferably from different theological traditions, to arrive at a reasonable idea of what the original languages said. I would like to add caveat. I have come to believe that Moses wrote the first five books in Egyptian hieroglyphics, which explains a lot of the pictorial language which was retained three of four hundred years later when Samual or some of David's scribes translated it into written Hebrew which had been invented in the meantime.
I like Dr, Graham's statement that he believed in the divine inspiration of Scripture but not in the divine inspiration of any given English translation of Scripture. Unless you are fluent in Greek for the New Testament and Hebrew for the Old Testament you need to compare at least four different English translations, preferably from different theological traditions, to arrive at a reasonable idea of what the original languages said. I would like to add caveat. I have come to believe that Moses wrote the first five books in Egyptian hieroglyphics, which explains a lot of the pictorial language which was retained three of four hundred years later when Samual or some of David's scribes translated it into written Hebrew which had been invented in the meantime.