Why I Won't Debate William Lane Craig - Richard Dawkins

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ม.ค. 2024
  • Watch the full conversation: • Religion Is Still Evil...
    To support me on Patreon (thank you): / cosmicskeptic
    To donate to my PayPal (thank you): www.paypal.me/cosmicskeptic
    - SPECIAL THANKS
    As always, I would like to direct extra gratitude to my top-tier patrons:
    John Early
    Dmitry C.
    Mouthy Buddha
    Solaf
    - CONNECT
    My Website/Blog: www.cosmicskeptic.com
    SOCIAL LINKS:
    Twitter: / cosmicskeptic
    Facebook: / cosmicskeptic
    Instagram: / cosmicskeptic
    Snapchat: cosmicskeptic
    The Within Reason Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast...
    - CONTACT
    Business email: contact@cosmicskeptic.com
    Or send me something:
    Alex O'Connor
    Po Box 1610
    OXFORD
    OX4 9LL
    ENGLAND
    ------------------------------------------

ความคิดเห็น • 4.5K

  • @zacharylehocki
    @zacharylehocki 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +614

    I admire the way Alex is so open and fair in how he interviews and he`s not afraid to push a little or challenge the interviewee, that`s what makes this such a great and fruitful conversation!

    • @jonathanj2666
      @jonathanj2666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      I admire how Dawkins isn't opposed to be pressed or challenged on his views and keeps them firm. That's what makes this such an insightful and beautiful conversation!

    • @zacharylehocki
      @zacharylehocki 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@jonathanj2666 I agree with that to, they are both being good sported in this interview.

    • @Filosofos1
      @Filosofos1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      why are your apostrophies backwards

    • @TubaTones
      @TubaTones 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Filosofos1some people around the world type on different types of keyboards. If you type on a Danish/Swedish/Norwegian keyboard, the actual apostrophe sign is quite difficult to find because those languages don’t really use apostrophes.

    • @hunterluxton5976
      @hunterluxton5976 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The guys a toy.

  • @stunns2003
    @stunns2003 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +418

    Richard Dawkins conveniently forgot about his debates with John Lennox.
    John exposed his “rationality from irrationality” argument but he left that bit out.

    • @raylanbenjamin6943
      @raylanbenjamin6943 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      John Lennox embarrassed him badly

    • @jimtruscott5670
      @jimtruscott5670 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@raylanbenjamin6943John Lennox is simply a dope.

    • @leoguarknight1588
      @leoguarknight1588 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You dropped your clown card🤡​@@jimtruscott5670

    • @timpetrinadavison8392
      @timpetrinadavison8392 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      ​@@jimtruscott5670Nice insult. May encourage clever people to investigate how dope he is...

    • @russmarkham2197
      @russmarkham2197 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@timpetrinadavison8392 I agree. John Lennox is a simpering idiot.

  • @1776iscool
    @1776iscool 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +361

    Richard Dawkins calling someone else pompous is really rich

    • @sebsebseb1905
      @sebsebseb1905 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      I know, right? :)))) Funny. It's called projection

    • @lukeism2
      @lukeism2 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It’s funny

    • @RandyHill-bj9pc
      @RandyHill-bj9pc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Dawkins might be pompous but at least he's right.

    • @THIRSTYGUMS
      @THIRSTYGUMS 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      What's pompous about Dawkins?

    • @mikefergus9897
      @mikefergus9897 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Yes it is, Dr. Craig would make Dawkins look like a buffoon. Hats off to Alex for being a generous host to all his guest.

  • @user-sb3zm1cq8l
    @user-sb3zm1cq8l 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    Dawkins forgot of his debate with Prof. John Lennox.

    • @loganleatherman7647
      @loganleatherman7647 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @user-sb3zm1cq8l
      Probably not. John Lennox largely just makes emotional appeals because Christianity makes him feel emotionally comforted and existentially secure. The vast majority of his arguments boil down to “I believe in God because I can’t/don’t want to imagine a universe without God”

    • @JohnnyBeeDawg
      @JohnnyBeeDawg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh he wants to forget that

    • @Captain2Pig
      @Captain2Pig 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lennox the goat herder ? wow, how could he forget?

    • @Hirnlego999
      @Hirnlego999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lennox is sort of the santa clause version, the soft voice trying to put a good face on a genocidal dictator.
      From those who are more capable of seeing through the marketing it's not exactly convincing.
      If God is real and sends Lennox to hell then Lennox must agree that it's the right thing to do.
      What a fantastic faith

    • @zxbc1
      @zxbc1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think we all want to forget the existence of John Lennox, a shameful chapter on humanity.

  • @alexanderlaird6206
    @alexanderlaird6206 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +851

    Imagine Richard Dawkins himself criticizing someone for having a pompous voice

    • @xklepx
      @xklepx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Lol, good point

    • @johnmulvey5121
      @johnmulvey5121 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      Just what I was thinking!

    • @onnadarts23
      @onnadarts23 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

      I don't find him pompous at all. I find that he's humble, says things like "I might be wrong, but..." all the time, and generally listens quite closely to others.

    • @FakingANerve
      @FakingANerve 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@onnadarts23Agreed. Having a British accent doesn't make someone necessarily sound pompous. WLC, on the other hand, always has an arrogant expression and sounds like he's edging on an orgasm when he speaks.

    • @OptimusPrime-vg2ti
      @OptimusPrime-vg2ti 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Well if I were to imagine it, it would absolutely be someone like WLC that he was criticizing.

  • @mammawanna
    @mammawanna 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +181

    As an atheist, I find it ironic he would criticize someone for being pompous.

    • @evancohen1503
      @evancohen1503 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Why?

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      You're muddling the map for the place.
      An accent isn't equivalent to pomposity.

    • @MarkoVukovic0
      @MarkoVukovic0 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I would also like to know why you say that

    • @NickHolum
      @NickHolum 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I took it as Dawkins was more disgusted by what Craig is pompous about... ie Craig is pompous while bloviating in support of highly detestable and immoral topics

    • @MarkoVukovic0
      @MarkoVukovic0 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@NickHolum indeed. I don't think the OP has read the definition of the word. It certainly doesn't fit Dawkins.

  • @bangcolt
    @bangcolt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +257

    Sounds to me that Professor Dawkins is afraid to debate William Lane Craig.

    • @JohannesWiberg
      @JohannesWiberg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Afraid is probably not the right word, but I certainly think he should be wary of it. WLC is quite skilled in the art of debate by simply using a reassuring voice and a lot of repetition and apparent certainty. I've heard many people pick apart his arguments, but that doesn't bother him a bit when on a debate stage, he keeps to his script, and for easily convinced people, that can certainly sound convincing. It's quite easy to pick apart the Kalam Cosmical Argument, for example, but it is a bit technical - and if WLC takes the stage after you and just claims that you in fact DID NOT pick it apart, but rather it stands, "as you all can agree", well then it might just sound like he won the debate.

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nope.
      William Lane Craig justified mass child sl@ughter.
      No theist has evidence for any god, so there's no fear about debate with them lol

    • @DavidLoveMore
      @DavidLoveMore 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The righteous perisheth, and no man layeth it to heart: and merciful men are taken away, none considering that the righteous is taken away from the evil to come.

    • @BrotherTris
      @BrotherTris 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      where are you getting this sense of morality from? @@killerrabbit2693

    • @BrotherTris
      @BrotherTris 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ps. are you pro choice? @@killerrabbit2693

  • @Daxcheese555
    @Daxcheese555 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +412

    This was to me the big cop-out for the representation of the New Atheism movement. I grew up as a teenager in the 2000's and I was addicted to watching videos of Dawkins and Hitchens, while never letting go of my Christian background. The great virtue of the Four Horsemen and New Atheism movement in general, I thought, was the desire to question everything and willingness to put their ideas to the test in debate. I admired these people for their courage to ask the questions most Christians I felt were cowardly to ask. However, when William Lane Craig appeared on the stage all manner of excuses suddenly appeared. Polly Toynbee pulled out of the debate, Andrew Copson the head of the Humanist Association made the bizarre statement on radio that he felt it was a waste of time to debate William Lane Craig yet encouraged atheists in the audience-to-be to challenge and put to task Craig's views. Dawkins himself was happy to meet with Young Earth Creationists and random American preachers for his documentaries, yet when a philosopher of religion came to his own home turf he backed out by saying Craig was too horrible a person to share the stage with. This in spite the fact that he very regularly spoke with people he disagreed with and people who shared morals he would call evil. In short, it was an excuse to avoid his objections to God being put to the test by someone he feared was potentially able to grill him.

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get justice

    • @loganleatherman7647
      @loganleatherman7647 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

      Or… more likely, he simply doesn't care to take the time to debate Craig and his philosophical bloviating because Dawkins recognizes that you can’t philosophize a god into existence with word salads and blatant assertions built on more blatant assertions, which has pretty much been the entire point of WLC’s career after he openly admitted that the only thing that convinced him was “the witness of holy spirit”, which holds no merit outside of Christian circles and certainly holds no merit in academia. Craig is a professional word twister, and that’s why Dawkins won’t debate him; all Craig has are arguments without evidence

    • @Chakra_king
      @Chakra_king 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

      @@loganleatherman7647 Surely you cannot read what you just wrote and not see the absurdity in it...

    • @miesvaillanykyisyytta3252
      @miesvaillanykyisyytta3252 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Well Richard is eight years older than Craig and he's getting weaker with age as everyone else. Second I think that arguing for deism (That there is an impersonal, meaningless intelligence holding the world together) and Christianity are two different things but they are often conflated and even if Dawkins has a hard time with some argument for deism it does not justify the teachings of Christianity but the audience would not necessarily see it that way. It is completely meaningless to me if I learn that there is a slothful intelligence behind the world's creation just like it was meaningless for ancient people not to know how the physics of gravity work. You cannot have a meaningful personal relationship with gravity or the law of thermodynamics or the way snowflakes are formed; those are simply explanations for banal things we see every day. Saying that there must be a God and even proving it is no different to me than proving that there must be some force keeping the blood pumping in my veins; it's nice to know but it ultimately won't change my philosophical outlook on life. The theory of blood circulation did not lead to new religions.
      As for the Christianity thing more specifically from an atheist perspective it's no different than arguing for the virtuousness of a guy called Bob who lives in his mother's basement and allegedly has a rich criminal history. Bob never shows up when questioned and it's always his mother at the door answering questions for him. If Bob is so powerful why does not he get off his butt and at least prove that he's not skeletonized or mummified in the basement? It's intellectual masturbation where one guy is arguing for the Occam's razor type of explanation and one is wasting his intelligence on endless excuses for Bob; in the end nothing is changed; some people will keep joining Christianity for social reasons and those who don't live out those emotional moments never will because normally nobody is intellectually convinced by Christianity but many are intellectually deconverted. Some of these theology people are very bright and it's such a waste to see their intelligence being used to defend Bob instead of contribute to humanity and unlike atheism Christianity in the west has a very long institutional tradition of coming up with clever defenses of Bob whereas in my country we only had freedom of religion in the 20th century and the protestant church still enjoys massive privileges where theology programs are basically clandestine apologetics to benefit the clergy. Imagine if atheism or maybe more specifically anti-Christianity had such a long and forceful as well as forced tradition. I would not be surprised if there are people who can argue Dawkins to bits. It still does not make Bob get off the couch and prove that he's alive much less justify his indolence. A superhuman alien species could land on earth right now and make an incredible argument for some complete nonsense that even our brightest philosophers could not refute because of their superhuman intelligence but that would not make the rubbish real.

    • @rayzas4885
      @rayzas4885 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      ​@@loganleatherman7647Dawkins is a coping coward

  • @cazcow
    @cazcow 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +116

    "I find his manner pompous."
    Oh, the irony. The concentrated, sweet, delicious irony.

    • @Sentientfx1
      @Sentientfx1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      In what way is his manner pompous?

    • @t.d.2016
      @t.d.2016 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      ​@@Sentientfx1
      You're joking? Dawkins is like the pompous guy out there.

    • @Sentientfx1
      @Sentientfx1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So you're unable to pinpoint an example? This is what I'm getting at. You have a conclusion with no reasoning. @@t.d.2016

    • @alexanderlaird6206
      @alexanderlaird6206 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Sentientfx1 While I'm not especially interested in debating to what extent someone or another is arrogant, I will point out that t.d.'s sentiment is the exact one Dawkins leveraged against Craig. Similarly void of reasoning.

    • @SAwesome2
      @SAwesome2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@Sentientfx1 0:12 Who is your most formidable opponent on the God debate? "I don't think there are any."
      Sure, he uses rhetoric after to cover the fact that he is making an extremely arrogant/pompous statement, but that doesn't fix the arrogance. Then he doubles down on it saying that Craig has structured debate but that's all that's impressive, etc.
      Dawkins, in all his public lifespan, has always been a pompous, arrogant person. I'm not religious but I can't stand the dood.

  • @coltoncauthen8696
    @coltoncauthen8696 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Also, I appreciate Alex pressing this question and maintaining integrity based on what have been two very positive interactions between Alex and Craig (the two make a great discussion pair).

  • @BrandonsCommentary
    @BrandonsCommentary 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +134

    Alex is, by far, the most fair minded, and well read atheist in the realm of genuine Christian theology.

    • @user-kc7xk6wy2z
      @user-kc7xk6wy2z 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Although I'm not exactly sure why, if he doesn't believe in God, he spends so much of his time labouring on this subject. Probably because he makes money off having such a successful TH-cam channel. But really, if you don't believe in something, why spend so much time talking about it? There's plenty more to life that he could be enjoying spending time on.
      I'm a Christian man and, while I enjoy reading my Bible, praying, going to church and reading theology, I think Alex spends more time on God than I do!

    • @euclid9492
      @euclid9492 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@user-kc7xk6wy2z when a scientist has a hypothesis, they don’t go find reasons that it works and call it good. The only way to gain confidence and be academically taken seriously is by attacking your own beliefs and trying honestly to disprove your own ideas. You do this by partly by honestly and rigorously studying counter arguments and alternative explanations. If he didn’t take the time to learn about opposing views so deeply, he wouldn’t be anywhere near as convincing and his arguments would be much weaker. I’d encourage you to try challenging some of your own deeply held beliefs as well, it’s very rewarding.

    • @adriansims9770
      @adriansims9770 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@user-kc7xk6wy2z Alex has said before that he wants to be a Christian and that he is in a state of "non-resistant non-belief". Thus if God reveals himself to Alex, he would happily believe. To him, it's the hiddenness of God that makes him fairly sure that God does not exist.

    • @alana8863
      @alana8863 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@euclid9492 Spot on. I struggle when I hear Christians and other theists talking about how their faith has been challenged. It nearly always seems to mean that they have had to work at convincing themselves they're on the right track.
      With good science, having your views challenged by evidence or reason is exactly what you're seeking.
      The first approach will always be far inferior to the second.

    • @BrandonsCommentary
      @BrandonsCommentary 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@adriansims9770 that is one of the reasons I appreciate him. I have a Master of Divinity and an MA in Philosophy from a Southern Baptist seminary. It was when I wrote a paper on the Hiddenness of God that I realized how to explain what my real concerns about God were.

  • @jeremiahd4096
    @jeremiahd4096 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Dawkins needs to just say that he won't debate William Lane Craig because he doesn't Like him Lol

    • @rasnefas4989
      @rasnefas4989 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      It's because dawkins would most definitely get schooled in that debate. It's so obvious if you followed the whole saga. He initially agreed to a debate and then declined amd gave a ridiculous reason at first. ''I was not aware of the debating style of craig when I agreed'' 😂😂

    • @richardevans560
      @richardevans560 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I've no idea who WLC is, but if Dawkins doesn't like him he's ok with me.

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      William Lane Craig justified mass child sla#hter, reason enough to not share a stage with that nimrod.

    • @lavishwhisper6753
      @lavishwhisper6753 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He did. Near the end he simply said he “doesn’t respect him”. ‘Nuff said 👍

    • @themostamazingguy
      @themostamazingguy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's exactly what he said

  • @sirmrs6952
    @sirmrs6952 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +245

    As a Christian, mad props to Alex. What a stand up gentleman that displays courage respectfully. A display that I personally think makes a good and honest man.

    • @Bob.55
      @Bob.55 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      God loves intelligent people like Alex. Take it from an ex Believer of over 50 years. There is no such thing as saved and unsaved souls. It’s all made up by the minds of know nothing, superstitious 1st century men.

    • @Richard_Nickerson
      @Richard_Nickerson 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@Bob.55
      ...what...?

    • @Bob.55
      @Bob.55 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Richard_Nickerson Soul condemnation is a lie from the pits of hell( pun intended)

    • @Richard_Nickerson
      @Richard_Nickerson 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Bob.55
      Souls are a lie

    • @Bob.55
      @Bob.55 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Richard_Nickerson Depends on your definition of soul.
      I just call what we have a part of the spirit of life and that woks for me. I don’t understand it and I have no need to.
      I am a bit of an odd duck sir. Kinda like a Cross between a Native American, a Jesus and an Albert Einstein.
      Carry on

  • @hamlet9984
    @hamlet9984 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +154

    Am I the only one who notices how fast Alex’s channel is growing lately? 670k to 679k in 2 days is quite impressive!

    • @daveveloz
      @daveveloz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Absolutely. Because he is brilliant but more importantly uniquely unbiased in everything he approaches.

    • @infinitelyexhausted
      @infinitelyexhausted 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      I honestly would not be surprised if it was because Christians are subscribing to his channel. There has been a rise in interest around Christianity recently. I'm a Christian and I really enjoy his content.

    • @MrMerve-tl9my
      @MrMerve-tl9my 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@infinitelyexhausted Hope you stick around! 😃😃

    • @-Thauma-
      @-Thauma- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Yes I have noticed.
      Alex is the Hitchens of our time ❤️

    • @Lukey111
      @Lukey111 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@-Thauma- two extremely different people

  • @TedATL1
    @TedATL1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Pretty rich Dawkins accusing someone else of being pompous.
    While at the same time simply declaring no one in the world has any argument against his position worth considering.
    Because, you know, I'm right. End of discussion.
    Quite a master debater!

    • @omnipop4936
      @omnipop4936 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      😂Yeah, he's so good, he... "transcends" debate. 😂 Can you imagine if Craig took the same stance (no opposing arguments worth considering)? He'd never hear the end of it from the Dawkins crowd!

    • @alexb9969
      @alexb9969 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WLC is fundamentally flawed on objective moral values - as Alex has proven, a theist has no choice but to be a moral relativist regarding the Bible. There is a lot those people did, under what they believed was a divine mandate, is intolerable in our day and age

    • @BrooklynAvenue
      @BrooklynAvenue 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Or it could be that a belief based on unjustified belief is a bad argument? Would it be arrogant for a person who debated flat earthers to say there are no good arguments for a flat earth?

    • @majmage
      @majmage 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      While I think it's wrong to avoid conversations, it's a simple fact that all major arguments for god are illogical and their logical errors have been explained to theists for years. So in that respect it's definitely true nobody has any compelling argument. I just think it's still worthwhile to keep having the discussion, as there are still millions left who haven't heard the reasons that believers' reasons for believing are illogical. As long as _some_ still have these conversations, that's important (at least until religious belief falls below 5-15% or something, where it's so irrelevant that debunking it isn't as important).

    • @johneastwood3039
      @johneastwood3039 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@majmage Why do we have eyes? Ears? Teeth? An ass? Sperm? It's so we can see, hear, chew, shit and make babies. That my friend is by design. You atheists are the dumb ones, despite how smart you like to think you are.

  • @Sammo212
    @Sammo212 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Richard Dawkins calling someone else pompous is the pot calling the kettle black lol. William always comes off as very respectful in every interview and debate I've seen him in. I can't really say the same of Mr Dawkins. There is literally 0 usefulness from debating Mr Dawkins on anything as he's already admitted that even if "God came down to show Himself to me I would not believe in His existence."
    Dr Craig is far more than just a "professional debater" and the way in which Mr Dawkins speaks comes off more that he simply just doesn't want interact with someone who actually challenges him from the perspective of being persuasive to the audience.

    • @livrowland171
      @livrowland171 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never heard that. Have heard him say he's not 100% atheist as it's not possible to completely rule out there being a God, but he hasn't seen good evidence for one.

    • @coolcat23
      @coolcat23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Sammo212 Have you seen William L. Craig and "Capturing Christianity" smugly deride Carl Sagan? The way they engaged with Sagan's arguments was anything but respectful. It was rather shocking how poorly they did, yet felt extremely smug about themselves.

    • @Sammo212
      @Sammo212 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@livrowland171 I have seen him say there is literally nothing that could happen that would prove the existence of any god. No matter what happened, no matter who or what showed itself to him he would not believe they were god. That's peak atheist into the real of anti-theist.

    • @Sammo212
      @Sammo212 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@coolcat23 I've not, generally Craig is not smug or rude to those he's speaking with or debating. Dawkins, however, is generally always that.

    • @Hirnlego999
      @Hirnlego999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's not challenging, his "logic" lacks evidence, and it's utterly unconvincing to anyone who works with evidence.
      WLC is as empty handed as any Muslim or Jewish scholar. It doesn't matter that they took a book report too seriously, it lacks evidence.

  • @matheuscalderaro7709
    @matheuscalderaro7709 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +112

    Respectufully, sounded like a excuse to me.

    • @adamnewsome2152
      @adamnewsome2152 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Yes agree, but what would Dawkins bring that Hitchens, or Harris didn't?

    • @Navyfrog22
      @Navyfrog22 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@adamnewsome2152 it’s hard to debate someone who believes in magic. What points did Craig make against Christopher Hitchens?

    • @danh945
      @danh945 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Navyfrog22 His version of the Kalam Cosmological Argument - basically everything must have a cause, so the universe must have a cause which is in itself causeless, and so that must be god because god doesn't have a cause (even though everything must have a cause). And then to stop the argument ceasing at Deism he makes this god a personal god because the wheels set in motion would lead to us (as if that even slightly matters). It's wall to wall bullshit. Hitchens struggled a little because his strengths are not in cosmology, but essentially beat him handedly by calling out the internal inconsistencies in WLC's claims.

    • @MisterEvvvSymphoenix
      @MisterEvvvSymphoenix 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Navyfrog22 If you really look at it, the claims he supports are even more extraordinary than magic. I'll only explain how if someone requests it. Otherwise, I don't feel like dropping a miniature essay in the comment section is a good idea in this context.

    • @ihavenoideaonanything
      @ihavenoideaonanything 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MisterEvvvSymphoenix you should drop it

  • @badamson
    @badamson 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

    Premise 1
    Deduction 2
    Had me dying

    • @WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
      @WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's funny because it's how easily Dawkins and the rest of the new atheists absurd arguments are shown to be fallacious or poorly designed. Dawkins flat out can't debate or produce compelling arguments for his position. That's why he has said he won't debate and says there is no evidence that could ever make him a Theist. He is willingly ignorant. Peter atkins and others have said the exact same thing. This is why the new Atheists have faded into obscurity they are irrelevant.

    • @aaronstypes4083
      @aaronstypes4083 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      Dawkins saying that he has so much contempt for Craig that he couldn't stand to be in the same room with him, (even though Craig is one of the friendliest and most cordial debaters out there)---that had me dying, too! I smell fear from Dawkins. Yes, Sir Richard is a scaredy-cat.

    • @Joeonline26
      @Joeonline26 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@aaronstypes4083 Imagine he had to debate David Bentley Hart. Hart would absolutely eviscerate Dawkins🤣

    • @orangemanbad
      @orangemanbad 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sad how feeble old Dawkins is!

    • @WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
      @WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@orangemanbad lol they showed his face as he was present for John Lennoxs' speech on why God must exist at Oxford around a year ago and he looked so old mad and bitter for literally no reason just sitting in the audience it was almost hilarious.

  • @dgphi
    @dgphi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    WLC employs logical arguments when he debates. I mean logical argument in the strict technical sense of the term. That's very rare in a debate. To those who haven't studied logic however he may sound like he is talking nonsense. They don't have the intellectual tools to follow the detail of what he is saying.
    Calling a logical argument "pompous" is not a refutation of anything. RD makes himself look very weak here.

    • @ETM2024
      @ETM2024 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Using formal logic does not prevent one from talking nonsense. A skilled sophist will happily couch an unsound argument in seemingly valid terms.

    • @loganleatherman7647
      @loganleatherman7647 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @alk7393
      “A skilled sophist will happily couch an unsound argument in seemingly valid terms.”
      WLC’s career in a nutshell. He even knows that there’s no convincing evidence for God so he relies on argumentation to “prove” that God exists, which I’m sure he’s aware that you can’t philosophize God into existence. God either exists or doesn’t exist, and no amount of philosophical arguments will change whichever one of those is true

    • @ETM2024
      @ETM2024 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@loganleatherman7647
      Unfortunately so many seem unable to see through his tiresome rhetoric and are actually bamboozled enough to praise it as something far more sophisticated than the faded window dressing it so obviously is.

    • @dgphi
      @dgphi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ETM2024 "A skilled sophist will happily couch an unsound argument in seemingly valid terms."
      Can you explain this further, please? Do you mean "valid" and "sound" here in the technical senses of the words?
      A deductive logical argument can be incorrect in two ways: It can be invalid, meaning that incorrect rules of inference were used, or unsound, meaning that it rests on untrue premises. (Or both.)
      In what way does WLC get it wrong?

    • @UnknownString88
      @UnknownString88 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      ​@@dgphi It's not specifically a WLC problem, more like every single argument for god depend on unverified premises, that's why they're unsound, but WLC is skilled in expressing them as logical facts. They're not easy arguments to analyze so in a quick debate the one using such a trick has the advantage.

  • @Jaymastia
    @Jaymastia 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    well, I am no fan of Alex but I sure do admire his clarity, concise, and well-mannered approach in conversations like this

  • @sammcloughlin1578
    @sammcloughlin1578 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +182

    As a Christian, I enjoyed this discussion, and I applaud you Alex for having a reasoned and positively fair and polite approach to both believers and non-believers. Keep up the good work!

    • @user-qg5zc1kf4f
      @user-qg5zc1kf4f 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Y do you believe in a God?

    • @dkant4511
      @dkant4511 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@user-qg5zc1kf4f because it's more probable to think that we came from something rather than nothing. This entity we call God but could be anything equivalent

    • @user-qg5zc1kf4f
      @user-qg5zc1kf4f 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@dkant4511 the gods come from nothing evidently

    • @dkant4511
      @dkant4511 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-qg5zc1kf4f Read The Essence of Christianity by Ludwig Feuerbach. God is just a manmade concept. Haha it's the best our species bound by language and limited reason can do!

    • @BatTCK
      @BatTCK 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@user-qg5zc1kf4fI’ll bite.
      In the Christian belief, God doesn’t “come from” anything. God is a preexisting entity unbound by our observations of the constraints of space and time, as, of course, a creator of said concepts. God always has, and always will exist, the beginning and the end.
      As for why I believe, it’s ultimately personal. I did grow up in a Christian home, so you might discount my beliefs entirely, but over time, I did my own study into the subject. I found that, in reading the Bible and in meditative prayer, I would feel a divine peace come over me. There were times additionally where I felt a stirring in my heart for something greater, and God was there.
      Whether you believe or not is your own choice, ultimately. However, I would encourage you to explore the religion for what it truly is, asking theologians and priest questions to obtain a fuller understanding of the belief system rather than the views of exclusively other atheists. As a Christian, it is well worth it for me to understand my own beliefs deeper by seeing atheist critiques, and I believe it has only made me a more devout believer. Either way, God bless, and have a fantastic day.

  • @lillypotter6722
    @lillypotter6722 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    People if you haven’t watched the full interview/ conversation you definitely should check it out I found it very funny at points and interesting

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then do not tell me this is not a sick cult with godless ass kissers and godless alone trash people that are so obsessed with what other believe and the reflection of other people believe. No respect for those sick godless people.
      For Real? What kind of stupid empty cult is this nothing offer nothing gives, but empty BS? As God really cares about what you think and your stupid philosophy empty words as godless alone trash person (anyone who deny God is a godless alone trash person)… Another reason none can respect you, you are a lier as any modern Goddenier.. And we hope the next generation will be better then you and forget about you and your empty stupid worthless atheism not even worst to clean my ass. … you are just empty like it.
      Then why only godless alone trash people are obsessed with hell, while we are not? Another reason to do not be like them, and live with this constantly fear… What idiots!
      For really you did not get those empty Videos where godless alone people
      constantly talk about God, showing their obsession, are made not to
      help anyhow your godless alone life but to trap you into this empty
      stupid cult called atheism they know we live in the time of stupidity
      and godless trash people so they need to capture them as more as they
      can.
      They know you are the most stupid, weakest and alone people in
      the face of earth and they need to take advantages on you. They know you
      run anytime you see godless ass to kiss it. That what this empty BS
      cult atheism make you be, without God and without dignity. But let see
      how you are in trapped in this cult: Let see how many godless rats are
      here with their empty words and life, just as their cult called atheism.
      Why? Why Godless alone trash people want see the existence of God
      when it is clear that if they and all the things they see around (earth,
      stars, planets and so on) if they are creation something must created
      them. For real no respect for those godless blind trash people. God is
      what they do not know have and do not know in their miserable alone
      trash life. But God will take care about them as well, once death as
      anyone alse. Let's hope we will have better generation that those
      godless alone trash one.... We really do not need this empty and
      worthless cult called atheism and those modern godless alone idiots who
      thinks God cares to exist what those poor alone people think about him.
      No respect for them and their miserable godless alone life. (they are
      also godless ass kissers, as they run anytime they see a godless alone
      person... that what happen when you do not have God in your life, you
      lose your dignity, and you start to be disgusting in that way)... Oh
      anyway when you stopped to believe in God something died on you but you
      are so pathetic that you are not willing to admit it (right?). What
      trashy people without shame they deny their creator, and they will be
      judge for it.... Liars ad patetich as any Goddeniers. so their worthless
      empty life without him.... They are even the weakest people, because if
      they are wrong, they are the ones who will pay for denying God... Won't
      be in their shoes. No respect for them....
      I told you this godless
      is the worst generation (those people are just empty and worthless as
      the cult they are in), and when it will be gone with their stupid
      empty, worthless atheism that does not going anywhere, that do not offer
      or teach anything, none will complain about it, not even those very
      weak losers!!!!! ... Do not call them atheist but godless alone souless
      trash. Let's forget about those worthless empty people and their
      worthless and empty cult do not even good to clean the dirtiest motel.
      WHEN YOU WILL BE GONE NONE WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR STUPID CULt
      CALLED ATHEISM. You are the worst of people, no respect for you:...
      those are juss godless alone trash people, liers as any Godeniers with
      less thing sacred in their miserable alone godless life… those weak
      people are so weak and alone that they wait for an empty videos from an
      obsessed godless person to kiss his ass, disgustingly (no God, No
      Dignity) it would not change their life, actually more alone and empty,
      (they do not even have a real community) empty life they live empty shit
      they are in like this stupid cult called Atheism! No respect for them.
      (They are very weak, empty and frustrated people, a life that none will
      accepted, but those godless alone trash idiots).. those who say there is
      no God will pay for it, soon or later... No won't be a godless alone
      trash person into an empty cult not even good for my ass such atheism,
      that offers them nothing. But emptiness and lonlyness for their
      miserabile godless alone life. No respect for them. They are just empty
      as their cult called atheism. But they will pay this soon or later, and
      all the emptiness for nothing they are facing in their ridicolous
      miserable alone life! It is time to throw on the trash empty atheism and
      godless alone trash people, they are not even worthless to clean shit.
      You can not respect them and their emptiness! It is over for you, trash
      is not even good to clean you of all this atheism BS. No respect for
      you. Let's really hope we can have a better generation and forget this
      godless alone trash one as quickly as possible. IT IS OVER, it is time
      for you and this nosense called atheism to go back from the nothing you
      come from. No respect for you. You will pay all this shit, soon or
      later...
      Today I will put your BS atheism in the toilet and flash it
      and you godless alone will shut up, ok? You are worthless and empty as
      your stupid cult. No respect for you.... This is the worst, weakest,
      empty generation, and when it will be over with their stupid empty cult
      called atheism none will complain it. IT'S IS OVER, godless alone
      trash.... Those godless alone poor people are playing with the fire, and
      they will pay for it, and even badly........
      They are so
      desperate and frustrated in and empty stupid life... No sorry for you.
      Let's hope in the next generation, let's hope in a better generation,
      and let's forget this one and trhow it on the trash with their stupid,
      nosense cult called atheism that will lead them anywhere. No respect for
      you again..... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GODLESS ALONE TRASH PEOPLE AND
      YOUR EMPTY STUPID ATHEISM NOT EVEN GOOD TO CLEAN THE DIRTIEST TOILET IN
      THE WORLD... You got no peace over there (and if God is real you will be
      and are f.... up.. You godless alone people are so weak).........
      God
      will care about you as well, poor person.... (you life is more
      miserable and empty without God, but you are so patetic to realize it).
      NO respect for you and your empty cult called atheism....... You are
      just frutrated,obsessed, miserable, alone godless person that does
      deserve any kind of respect, just to be so. (Lier as any
      Godenier)....... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GUYS, YOU AND YOUR STUPID EMPTY CULT
      ATHEISM That does not even deserve my piss….. all this just show how much those godless trash people are frustrated (to do not have what people have sacred and holly) no respect for them. it is time to throw away that empty BS cult called atheism that does not explain anything and it is not even good to clean the dirtiest toilet. Godless alone trash people, liars as an any Goddenier, dishonest and the worst and stupidest generation ever had. Let’s froget about this godless trash worthless generation and waiting for a better one. (By the way you will be judge as anyone alse once death by God, do not think you will escape because you deny him, as a godless alone rat as you are (You are also a disgusting godless ass kisser, that anytime you see a godlesss ass you run to kiss it. because you got no God and no dignity in your miserable godless life) NO RESPECT FOR YOU (your life is more empty and miserable without God, but you are the only fool to do not get it… WHY?)... this godless alone trash generation is the worst... Let's hope we can forget about them and have a better one. No respect for them and their stupid empty cult called atheism...... Godless weak people (you are weaker now and later ponce you will confront God, no matter what you sick people think about him)........... They do not deserve any respect, with their godless alone trash family who raised so trashy and sick to deny God. (and they will also pay fgor it, soon or later......... They got No God and no Dignity... something dies inside them when they stop to believe in God, but their are so patetic to admit... Soon or later they will stop to write empty shit on youtube about what we believe... Why? They are very weak, and quickly to change their mind about God... they are worthless people just like their empty atheism... but surelly they can not call theirselves atheists, but godless alone weak trash people. No respect for those liers or disgusting godless desperate ass kissers.... /they need to slpit on their dirthy mouth every morning as they deny God... but they are deceiving none but themselves, as they will paid for it, and be judge by God once death as anyone alse. (So it is better to be a son of God,m that a godless alone weak person).
      It is time to theow on the trash atheims (where it belong) and forget about this generation (have better people then them). God will take care about them as well, and I won't be in the place of those godless weak alone people and disguasting godless ass kisses...... They lost any dignity, denying God, no doubt about that........... they will pay for giving the back to God for this empty cult called atheism, soon or later... God will judge them as well. (they lost all dignity when they stopped to believe in God). No Dignity and no >>God, just a miserable alone godless life, to kiss godless alone ass. (The worst perople, the worst generation... None will cry once they will be over....

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get justice

  • @my_everydayadventure
    @my_everydayadventure 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What a terrible answer to why you wouldn’t debate someone. “Well I don’t like their voice and their view on history is violent.” I’m sorry but ignorance is not a proper response to not liking something that may have taken place.

  • @christianshaw9102
    @christianshaw9102 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +182

    John Lennox took him out to dry

    • @alexnik1181
      @alexnik1181 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Quite the opposite.

    • @christianshaw9102
      @christianshaw9102 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      How?

    • @joeykyle492
      @joeykyle492 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Bring forth one argument that proves god Lennox said 😊

    • @billleroy6736
      @billleroy6736 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Dawkins would wet his pants if he got close to Bill Craig

    • @kevinadamson5768
      @kevinadamson5768 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@billleroy6736Craig is a brainwashed crank, making a living peddling a myth. 😂

  • @fellowtraveller2795
    @fellowtraveller2795 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I appreciate you arguing from the other side. Helps clarify the issues

  • @ritchiediggs
    @ritchiediggs 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    😂 “With the boxing ring”. It’s about time someone pointed out how weird that episode in Mexico was.

  • @aaronmueller1560
    @aaronmueller1560 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I appreciate how much you are willing to push against or poke at anyone. You ask pointed questions aimed at the ideas, not the people, who are the subject of discussion, and keep things respectful. You also wait patiently for answers, you clearly aren’t trying to pull gotcha’s to get a win, but instead forcing your interviewee to consider and explain their position in regards to other viewpoints or their other positions. So refreshing to see.

  • @gertstronkhorst2343
    @gertstronkhorst2343 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Richard Dawkins doesn't debate. He smooches up to people who agree with him, and oozes contempt for people who don't. He feels that people who don't agree with him are diseased. Why would he take them seriously? What he likes is a young man like Alex showering him with adulation, never asking him a difficult question. He enjoys that above anything else. He doesn't suffer fools and he decides who is and isn't a fool. And ironically, he says he doesn't want to be remembered above as an atheist. You have to admit, that's kinda funny!

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get justice

    • @monikasmithsonian2985
      @monikasmithsonian2985 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I actually think Alex have a fair amount of pushback

    • @gertstronkhorst2343
      @gertstronkhorst2343 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@monikasmithsonian2985 Not really, they were all pretty easy lobs. Also, you can tell they're basically in agreement when Alex sniggers at the mention of some of the people they mention. If you think this was a serious interview, I believe you are mistaken. All it does, is show us what a cantankerous and intollerant individual Richard Dawkins really is.

    • @Hstevenson69
      @Hstevenson69 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@gertstronkhorst2343 I disagree. You sound like you have a bias against Dawkins for some emotional reason. He's just a form of British that seems cantankerous. Not to mention the fact that he's stuck on the edge where evolutionary biology often conflicts with dogmatic religious fanatics. This is a frustrating place to find one's self if you're simply after truth, and you find yourself constantly running into people trying to stifle it.

    • @gertstronkhorst2343
      @gertstronkhorst2343 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Hstevenson69 He literally says he has contempt for people who don't agree with him. Surely you're not suggesting that there is one truth, that science only can uncover, are you? Also, calling me emotional is such a weak thing to do, such a feeble attempt to invalidate my opinions about this. Do you usually do that?

  • @chrisfieramosca
    @chrisfieramosca 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Nah bc Dawkins himself has said arguments from the fine tuning of the universe is what would make him believe in a discussion with Francis Collins. Basically saying people like John Lennox, Francis Collins and Sy Garte aren’t formidable how arrogant is this man Dawkins

    • @lightbearer313
      @lightbearer313 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Real philosophers ignore the people you named as amateur dabblers.

    • @caiomateus4194
      @caiomateus4194 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@lightbearer313 real philosophers (that is, analytical philosophers) ignore Dawkins...

    • @jimbob4920
      @jimbob4920 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@lightbearer313
      >Dawkins
      >Real philosophy
      LMAOO

    • @DavidLoveMore
      @DavidLoveMore 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The joke is that those fine tuning arguments are failing because it is based on a model (the Λ-CDM model) that is falling apart.

    • @Hirnlego999
      @Hirnlego999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fine tuning? Like God's perfect creation having an immune system that can target its OWN host?
      Bloody fantastic work
      These types of arguments come from people who say god does things perfectly as well. The idiot didn't even succeed with his little Eden project, even though he knows the outcome before it even occurs. Derp.

  • @christhetanman2639
    @christhetanman2639 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +74

    If I had to boil this down to one simple summary of why Dawkins won’t debate Craig it would be this:
    “I don’t like the sound of his voice and he doesn’t see the Bible the way I think he should.”
    Okay 👍

    • @shassett79
      @shassett79 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Well, more like, "I think he's a thoroughly dishonest and immoral person."

    • @cripplingautism5785
      @cripplingautism5785 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@shassett79what would be more dishonest is denying it. If anything he deserves some respect for biting the bullet.

    • @nadebob1519
      @nadebob1519 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And this “smart” people believed him 😂

    • @Mandragara
      @Mandragara 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Wrong. His reason is "WLC thinks a genocide of children actually happened and leaps at the opportunity to defend it and call it good - I find that disgusting".

    • @macroeconomia1987
      @macroeconomia1987 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@Mandragaraeven if true, that is still a very bad excuse for not debating WLC... // WLC even claims wth cernatnity that this slutter happened and was good, he sinoly pointe out that it is a coherent *posibility*

  • @Louis.R
    @Louis.R 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    This man is an exemplar of intellectual humility.

    • @Tobi_237
      @Tobi_237 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Who?😂

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then do not tell me this is not a sick cult with godless ass kissers and godless alone trash people that are so obsessed with what other believe and the reflection of other people believe. No respect for those sick godless people.
      For Real? What kind of stupid empty cult is this nothing offer nothing gives, but empty BS? As God really cares about what you think and your stupid philosophy empty words as godless alone trash person (anyone who deny God is a godless alone trash person)… Another reason none can respect you, you are a lier as any modern Goddenier.. And we hope the next generation will be better then you and forget about you and your empty stupid worthless atheism not even worst to clean my ass. … you are just empty like it.
      Then why only godless alone trash people are obsessed with hell, while we are not? Another reason to do not be like them, and live with this constantly fear… What idiots!
      For really you did not get those empty Videos where godless alone people
      constantly talk about God, showing their obsession, are made not to
      help anyhow your godless alone life but to trap you into this empty
      stupid cult called atheism they know we live in the time of stupidity
      and godless trash people so they need to capture them as more as they
      can.
      They know you are the most stupid, weakest and alone people in
      the face of earth and they need to take advantages on you. They know you
      run anytime you see godless ass to kiss it. That what this empty BS
      cult atheism make you be, without God and without dignity. But let see
      how you are in trapped in this cult: Let see how many godless rats are
      here with their empty words and life, just as their cult called atheism.
      Why? Why Godless alone trash people want see the existence of God
      when it is clear that if they and all the things they see around (earth,
      stars, planets and so on) if they are creation something must created
      them. For real no respect for those godless blind trash people. God is
      what they do not know have and do not know in their miserable alone
      trash life. But God will take care about them as well, once death as
      anyone alse. Let's hope we will have better generation that those
      godless alone trash one.... We really do not need this empty and
      worthless cult called atheism and those modern godless alone idiots who
      thinks God cares to exist what those poor alone people think about him.
      No respect for them and their miserable godless alone life. (they are
      also godless ass kissers, as they run anytime they see a godless alone
      person... that what happen when you do not have God in your life, you
      lose your dignity, and you start to be disgusting in that way)... Oh
      anyway when you stopped to believe in God something died on you but you
      are so pathetic that you are not willing to admit it (right?). What
      trashy people without shame they deny their creator, and they will be
      judge for it.... Liars ad patetich as any Goddeniers. so their worthless
      empty life without him.... They are even the weakest people, because if
      they are wrong, they are the ones who will pay for denying God... Won't
      be in their shoes. No respect for them....
      I told you this godless
      is the worst generation (those people are just empty and worthless as
      the cult they are in), and when it will be gone with their stupid
      empty, worthless atheism that does not going anywhere, that do not offer
      or teach anything, none will complain about it, not even those very
      weak losers!!!!! ... Do not call them atheist but godless alone souless
      trash. Let's forget about those worthless empty people and their
      worthless and empty cult do not even good to clean the dirtiest motel.
      WHEN YOU WILL BE GONE NONE WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR STUPID CULt
      CALLED ATHEISM. You are the worst of people, no respect for you:...
      those are juss godless alone trash people, liers as any Godeniers with
      less thing sacred in their miserable alone godless life… those weak
      people are so weak and alone that they wait for an empty videos from an
      obsessed godless person to kiss his ass, disgustingly (no God, No
      Dignity) it would not change their life, actually more alone and empty,
      (they do not even have a real community) empty life they live empty shit
      they are in like this stupid cult called Atheism! No respect for them.
      (They are very weak, empty and frustrated people, a life that none will
      accepted, but those godless alone trash idiots).. those who say there is
      no God will pay for it, soon or later... No won't be a godless alone
      trash person into an empty cult not even good for my ass such atheism,
      that offers them nothing. But emptiness and lonlyness for their
      miserabile godless alone life. No respect for them. They are just empty
      as their cult called atheism. But they will pay this soon or later, and
      all the emptiness for nothing they are facing in their ridicolous
      miserable alone life! It is time to throw on the trash empty atheism and
      godless alone trash people, they are not even worthless to clean shit.
      You can not respect them and their emptiness! It is over for you, trash
      is not even good to clean you of all this atheism BS. No respect for
      you. Let's really hope we can have a better generation and forget this
      godless alone trash one as quickly as possible. IT IS OVER, it is time
      for you and this nosense called atheism to go back from the nothing you
      come from. No respect for you. You will pay all this shit, soon or
      later...
      Today I will put your BS atheism in the toilet and flash it
      and you godless alone will shut up, ok? You are worthless and empty as
      your stupid cult. No respect for you.... This is the worst, weakest,
      empty generation, and when it will be over with their stupid empty cult
      called atheism none will complain it. IT'S IS OVER, godless alone
      trash.... Those godless alone poor people are playing with the fire, and
      they will pay for it, and even badly........
      They are so
      desperate and frustrated in and empty stupid life... No sorry for you.
      Let's hope in the next generation, let's hope in a better generation,
      and let's forget this one and trhow it on the trash with their stupid,
      nosense cult called atheism that will lead them anywhere. No respect for
      you again..... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GODLESS ALONE TRASH PEOPLE AND
      YOUR EMPTY STUPID ATHEISM NOT EVEN GOOD TO CLEAN THE DIRTIEST TOILET IN
      THE WORLD... You got no peace over there (and if God is real you will be
      and are f.... up.. You godless alone people are so weak).........
      God
      will care about you as well, poor person.... (you life is more
      miserable and empty without God, but you are so patetic to realize it).
      NO respect for you and your empty cult called atheism....... You are
      just frutrated,obsessed, miserable, alone godless person that does
      deserve any kind of respect, just to be so. (Lier as any
      Godenier)....... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GUYS, YOU AND YOUR STUPID EMPTY CULT
      ATHEISM That does not even deserve my piss….. all this just show how much those godless trash people are frustrated (to do not have what people have sacred and holly) no respect for them. it is time to throw away that empty BS cult called atheism that does not explain anything and it is not even good to clean the dirtiest toilet. Godless alone trash people, liars as an any Goddenier, dishonest and the worst and stupidest generation ever had. Let’s froget about this godless trash worthless generation and waiting for a better one. (By the way you will be judge as anyone alse once death by God, do not think you will escape because you deny him, as a godless alone rat as you are (You are also a disgusting godless ass kisser, that anytime you see a godlesss ass you run to kiss it. because you got no God and no dignity in your miserable godless life) NO RESPECT FOR YOU (your life is more empty and miserable without God, but you are the only fool to do not get it… WHY?)... this godless alone trash generation is the worst... Let's hope we can forget about them and have a better one. No respect for them and their stupid empty cult called atheism...... Godless weak people (you are weaker now and later ponce you will confront God, no matter what you sick people think about him)........... They do not deserve any respect, with their godless alone trash family who raised so trashy and sick to deny God. (and they will also pay fgor it, soon or later......... They got No God and no Dignity... something dies inside them when they stop to believe in God, but their are so patetic to admit... Soon or later they will stop to write empty shit on youtube about what we believe... Why? They are very weak, and quickly to change their mind about God... they are worthless people just like their empty atheism... but surelly they can not call theirselves atheists, but godless alone weak trash people. No respect for those liers or disgusting godless desperate ass kissers.... /they need to slpit on their dirthy mouth every morning as they deny God... but they are deceiving none but themselves, as they will paid for it, and be judge by God once death as anyone alse. (So it is better to be a son of God,m that a godless alone weak person).
      It is time to theow on the trash atheims (where it belong) and forget about this generation (have better people then them). God will take care about them as well, and I won't be in the place of those godless weak alone people and disguasting godless ass kisses...... They lost any dignity, denying God, no doubt about that........... they will pay for giving the back to God for this empty cult called atheism, soon or later... God will judge them as well. (they lost all dignity when they stopped to believe in God). No Dignity and no >>God, just a miserable alone godless life, to kiss godless alone ass. (The worst perople, the worst generation... None will cry once they will be over.....

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Tobi_237Then do not tell me this is not a sick cult with godless ass kissers and godless alone trash people that are so obsessed with what other believe and the reflection of other people believe. No respect for those sick godless people.
      For Real? What kind of stupid empty cult is this nothing offer nothing gives, but empty BS? As God really cares about what you think and your stupid philosophy empty words as godless alone trash person (anyone who deny God is a godless alone trash person)… Another reason none can respect you, you are a lier as any modern Goddenier.. And we hope the next generation will be better then you and forget about you and your empty stupid worthless atheism not even worst to clean my ass. … you are just empty like it.
      Then why only godless alone trash people are obsessed with hell, while we are not? Another reason to do not be like them, and live with this constantly fear… What idiots!
      For really you did not get those empty Videos where godless alone people
      constantly talk about God, showing their obsession, are made not to
      help anyhow your godless alone life but to trap you into this empty
      stupid cult called atheism they know we live in the time of stupidity
      and godless trash people so they need to capture them as more as they
      can.
      They know you are the most stupid, weakest and alone people in
      the face of earth and they need to take advantages on you. They know you
      run anytime you see godless ass to kiss it. That what this empty BS
      cult atheism make you be, without God and without dignity. But let see
      how you are in trapped in this cult: Let see how many godless rats are
      here with their empty words and life, just as their cult called atheism.
      Why? Why Godless alone trash people want see the existence of God
      when it is clear that if they and all the things they see around (earth,
      stars, planets and so on) if they are creation something must created
      them. For real no respect for those godless blind trash people. God is
      what they do not know have and do not know in their miserable alone
      trash life. But God will take care about them as well, once death as
      anyone alse. Let's hope we will have better generation that those
      godless alone trash one.... We really do not need this empty and
      worthless cult called atheism and those modern godless alone idiots who
      thinks God cares to exist what those poor alone people think about him.
      No respect for them and their miserable godless alone life. (they are
      also godless ass kissers, as they run anytime they see a godless alone
      person... that what happen when you do not have God in your life, you
      lose your dignity, and you start to be disgusting in that way)... Oh
      anyway when you stopped to believe in God something died on you but you
      are so pathetic that you are not willing to admit it (right?). What
      trashy people without shame they deny their creator, and they will be
      judge for it.... Liars ad patetich as any Goddeniers. so their worthless
      empty life without him.... They are even the weakest people, because if
      they are wrong, they are the ones who will pay for denying God... Won't
      be in their shoes. No respect for them....
      I told you this godless
      is the worst generation (those people are just empty and worthless as
      the cult they are in), and when it will be gone with their stupid
      empty, worthless atheism that does not going anywhere, that do not offer
      or teach anything, none will complain about it, not even those very
      weak losers!!!!! ... Do not call them atheist but godless alone souless
      trash. Let's forget about those worthless empty people and their
      worthless and empty cult do not even good to clean the dirtiest motel.
      WHEN YOU WILL BE GONE NONE WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR STUPID CULt
      CALLED ATHEISM. You are the worst of people, no respect for you:...
      those are juss godless alone trash people, liers as any Godeniers with
      less thing sacred in their miserable alone godless life… those weak
      people are so weak and alone that they wait for an empty videos from an
      obsessed godless person to kiss his ass, disgustingly (no God, No
      Dignity) it would not change their life, actually more alone and empty,
      (they do not even have a real community) empty life they live empty shit
      they are in like this stupid cult called Atheism! No respect for them.
      (They are very weak, empty and frustrated people, a life that none will
      accepted, but those godless alone trash idiots).. those who say there is
      no God will pay for it, soon or later... No won't be a godless alone
      trash person into an empty cult not even good for my ass such atheism,
      that offers them nothing. But emptiness and lonlyness for their
      miserabile godless alone life. No respect for them. They are just empty
      as their cult called atheism. But they will pay this soon or later, and
      all the emptiness for nothing they are facing in their ridicolous
      miserable alone life! It is time to throw on the trash empty atheism and
      godless alone trash people, they are not even worthless to clean shit.
      You can not respect them and their emptiness! It is over for you, trash
      is not even good to clean you of all this atheism BS. No respect for
      you. Let's really hope we can have a better generation and forget this
      godless alone trash one as quickly as possible. IT IS OVER, it is time
      for you and this nosense called atheism to go back from the nothing you
      come from. No respect for you. You will pay all this shit, soon or
      later...
      Today I will put your BS atheism in the toilet and flash it
      and you godless alone will shut up, ok? You are worthless and empty as
      your stupid cult. No respect for you.... This is the worst, weakest,
      empty generation, and when it will be over with their stupid empty cult
      called atheism none will complain it. IT'S IS OVER, godless alone
      trash.... Those godless alone poor people are playing with the fire, and
      they will pay for it, and even badly........
      They are so
      desperate and frustrated in and empty stupid life... No sorry for you.
      Let's hope in the next generation, let's hope in a better generation,
      and let's forget this one and trhow it on the trash with their stupid,
      nosense cult called atheism that will lead them anywhere. No respect for
      you again..... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GODLESS ALONE TRASH PEOPLE AND
      YOUR EMPTY STUPID ATHEISM NOT EVEN GOOD TO CLEAN THE DIRTIEST TOILET IN
      THE WORLD... You got no peace over there (and if God is real you will be
      and are f.... up.. You godless alone people are so weak).........
      God
      will care about you as well, poor person.... (you life is more
      miserable and empty without God, but you are so patetic to realize it).
      NO respect for you and your empty cult called atheism....... You are
      just frutrated,obsessed, miserable, alone godless person that does
      deserve any kind of respect, just to be so. (Lier as any
      Godenier)....... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GUYS, YOU AND YOUR STUPID EMPTY CULT
      ATHEISM That does not even deserve my piss….. all this just show how much those godless trash people are frustrated (to do not have what people have sacred and holly) no respect for them. it is time to throw away that empty BS cult called atheism that does not explain anything and it is not even good to clean the dirtiest toilet. Godless alone trash people, liars as an any Goddenier, dishonest and the worst and stupidest generation ever had. Let’s froget about this godless trash worthless generation and waiting for a better one. (By the way you will be judge as anyone alse once death by God, do not think you will escape because you deny him, as a godless alone rat as you are (You are also a disgusting godless ass kisser, that anytime you see a godlesss ass you run to kiss it. because you got no God and no dignity in your miserable godless life) NO RESPECT FOR YOU (your life is more empty and miserable without God, but you are the only fool to do not get it… WHY?)... this godless alone trash generation is the worst... Let's hope we can forget about them and have a better one. No respect for them and their stupid empty cult called atheism...... Godless weak people (you are weaker now and later ponce you will confront God, no matter what you sick people think about him)........... They do not deserve any respect, with their godless alone trash family who raised so trashy and sick to deny God. (and they will also pay fgor it, soon or later......... They got No God and no Dignity... something dies inside them when they stop to believe in God, but their are so patetic to admit... Soon or later they will stop to write empty shit on youtube about what we believe... Why? They are very weak, and quickly to change their mind about God... they are worthless people just like their empty atheism... but surelly they can not call theirselves atheists, but godless alone weak trash people. No respect for those liers or disgusting godless desperate ass kissers.... /they need to slpit on their dirthy mouth every morning as they deny God... but they are deceiving none but themselves, as they will paid for it, and be judge by God once death as anyone alse. (So it is better to be a son of God,m that a godless alone weak person).
      It is time to theow on the trash atheims (where it belong) and forget about this generation (have better people then them). God will take care about them as well, and I won't be in the place of those godless weak alone people and disguasting godless ass kisses...... They lost any dignity, denying God, no doubt about that........... they will pay for giving the back to God for this empty cult called atheism, soon or later... God will judge them as well. (they lost all dignity when they stopped to believe in God). No Dignity and no >>God, just a miserable alone godless life, to kiss godless alone ass. (The worst perople, the worst generation... None will cry once they will be over...

    • @adriansims9770
      @adriansims9770 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      That would be Alex.

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adriansims9770 he is just a godless weak alone person who takes advant from those godless alone weak trash people who run to kiss his dirty ass because they have not God in their life, so they lost all dignity and died inside. No respect for both

  • @like_30_hippies80
    @like_30_hippies80 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I appreciate how knowledgeable Alex is of the Christian defenses as shown by his responses to many of Dawkin's points (i.e. taking whole bible literally vs. genres of literature in the Bible).
    Imo it shows a more genuine attempt to understand and critique rather than be satisfied with easily rebutted points.

  • @jasonalexander8371
    @jasonalexander8371 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +157

    As a Christian, I really appreciate how accurately Alex represents the arguments for Christianity and the respect by which he engages Christians.

    • @silent_shout
      @silent_shout 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The guy has a theology degree from Oxford and thinks original sin is merely inherited guilt though.

    • @silent_shout
      @silent_shout 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The guy has a theology degree from Oxford and thinks original sin is merely inherited guilt though.

    • @Nana-bv1md
      @Nana-bv1md 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@silent_shoutIn Orthodox Christianity(Easteren Orthodoxy) ,the consider the original sin as ancestral sin(the plague of sin being past by generation) so his idea is not so far fetched.

    • @paultorbert6929
      @paultorbert6929 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      But he is still a better “Stand-In” for the side of Christianity than most layperson Christians.
      Facts are facts, and beliefs can only alter the perception of facts.

    • @k-3402
      @k-3402 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like how our side is always expected to be cordial, respectful, and accommodating. Meanwhile, Christians routinely threaten us with eternal torture. 🙄

  • @Fluffysweep
    @Fluffysweep 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I agree with Richard not giving WLC the floor again, unless William has got some new evidence for God that is going to blow Richards and everyone elses minds and make us all change the way we think about religion forever.
    In all the debates WLC has ever done in the last 4 1/2 decades, the evidence he has produced for the existence for God amounts to zero per cent.
    Dawkins on the other hand doesn't need to prove Evolution anymore, he has the backing of every countries scientific body behind him.
    So why bother..?

  • @jackjones6849
    @jackjones6849 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Alex was spot on; those question Dawkins asked should've been asked to WLC.
    Whether you like WLC or not, his evangelical views are representative of a huge number of Christians. If you want to change people's minds, deal with their best arguments/arguers.

    • @omnipop4936
      @omnipop4936 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agreed. As a Christian, I'm stoked at the idea of such a debate. They're not getting any younger though. 😟⌛🕙

    • @JohnnyBeeDawg
      @JohnnyBeeDawg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      He’s afraid of WLC and will never debate him in public.

    • @richardevans560
      @richardevans560 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I doubt WLC is anywhere near the best Christian apologist.

  • @marioruiz9863
    @marioruiz9863 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "William Lane Craig has a loud and pompous voice" ... "Hey pot, the kettle is calling you out. LOL

  • @sethgilbertson
    @sethgilbertson 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

    Awesome job hosting this discussion, Alex. I am familiar with you from your interactions with WLC and Douglas Murray (to name a couple), and I have always found you to be one of the most articulate and fair voices even though your personal beliefs are often different than mine. I really appreciate your intellectual integrity and respectful demeanor.
    On the flip side, I was surprised that Dawkins suggests that Christians should say that unsightly OT events simply never happened. That would be disingenuous. If they hold to the veracity of the OT as a historical text, they absolutely ought to wrestle with the ramifications. I can respect anyone who says “is this true, and if so, then what?” But I can’t respect someone who says “I wish this weren’t true, so I will conveniently pretend it is not so.” Dawkins’ promotion of this kind of self-serving expediency seems to be a reflection of his own character.

    • @nicolab2075
      @nicolab2075 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I'm no theologian, but I don't think Dawkins means Christians should say it never happened if they actually believe it did.
      I think he may interpret these Biblical stories as simply stories, not intended to be taken as true. I was never a believer, but I was brought up in the UK so am most familiar with the C of E that Richard Dawkins was brought up in, and which is the least dogmatic set of beliefs I know of!

    • @Evolution.1859
      @Evolution.1859 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      How about “we know this isn’t true, from Jewish mythologists, historians and archaeologists, so we can ignore the ridiculous claims up until at least King David.” That’s honest and supported by all the evidence ever encountered, so without invoking one’s lack of respect for the believer, can it be pointed out that the beliefs, themselves, deserve no respect?

    • @alexandertaylor7316
      @alexandertaylor7316 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Many Christians do not hold to the veracity of the OT as a historical text.
      First and foremost because many of the books are demonstrably not intended as historical text.
      E.g: WLC does not take the OT as historical text (or at least not in its entirety), highlighting in particular the start of Genesis as "Clearly False" if taken literally.

    • @OhManTFE
      @OhManTFE 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your strawman fools no one.

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then do not tell me this is not a sick cult with godless ass kissers and godless alone trash people that are so obsessed with what other believe and the reflection of other people believe. No respect for those sick godless people.
      For Real? What kind of stupid empty cult is this nothing offer nothing gives, but empty BS? As God really cares about what you think and your stupid philosophy empty words as godless alone trash person (anyone who deny God is a godless alone trash person)… Another reason none can respect you, you are a lier as any modern Goddenier.. And we hope the next generation will be better then you and forget about you and your empty stupid worthless atheism not even worst to clean my ass. … you are just empty like it.
      Then why only godless alone trash people are obsessed with hell, while we are not? Another reason to do not be like them, and live with this constantly fear… What idiots!
      For really you did not get those empty Videos where godless alone people
      constantly talk about God, showing their obsession, are made not to
      help anyhow your godless alone life but to trap you into this empty
      stupid cult called atheism they know we live in the time of stupidity
      and godless trash people so they need to capture them as more as they
      can.
      They know you are the most stupid, weakest and alone people in
      the face of earth and they need to take advantages on you. They know you
      run anytime you see godless ass to kiss it. That what this empty BS
      cult atheism make you be, without God and without dignity. But let see
      how you are in trapped in this cult: Let see how many godless rats are
      here with their empty words and life, just as their cult called atheism.
      Why? Why Godless alone trash people want see the existence of God
      when it is clear that if they and all the things they see around (earth,
      stars, planets and so on) if they are creation something must created
      them. For real no respect for those godless blind trash people. God is
      what they do not know have and do not know in their miserable alone
      trash life. But God will take care about them as well, once death as
      anyone alse. Let's hope we will have better generation that those
      godless alone trash one.... We really do not need this empty and
      worthless cult called atheism and those modern godless alone idiots who
      thinks God cares to exist what those poor alone people think about him.
      No respect for them and their miserable godless alone life. (they are
      also godless ass kissers, as they run anytime they see a godless alone
      person... that what happen when you do not have God in your life, you
      lose your dignity, and you start to be disgusting in that way)... Oh
      anyway when you stopped to believe in God something died on you but you
      are so pathetic that you are not willing to admit it (right?). What
      trashy people without shame they deny their creator, and they will be
      judge for it.... Liars ad patetich as any Goddeniers. so their worthless
      empty life without him.... They are even the weakest people, because if
      they are wrong, they are the ones who will pay for denying God... Won't
      be in their shoes. No respect for them....
      I told you this godless
      is the worst generation (those people are just empty and worthless as
      the cult they are in), and when it will be gone with their stupid
      empty, worthless atheism that does not going anywhere, that do not offer
      or teach anything, none will complain about it, not even those very
      weak losers!!!!! ... Do not call them atheist but godless alone souless
      trash. Let's forget about those worthless empty people and their
      worthless and empty cult do not even good to clean the dirtiest motel.
      WHEN YOU WILL BE GONE NONE WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR STUPID CULt
      CALLED ATHEISM. You are the worst of people, no respect for you:...
      those are juss godless alone trash people, liers as any Godeniers with
      less thing sacred in their miserable alone godless life… those weak
      people are so weak and alone that they wait for an empty videos from an
      obsessed godless person to kiss his ass, disgustingly (no God, No
      Dignity) it would not change their life, actually more alone and empty,
      (they do not even have a real community) empty life they live empty shit
      they are in like this stupid cult called Atheism! No respect for them.
      (They are very weak, empty and frustrated people, a life that none will
      accepted, but those godless alone trash idiots).. those who say there is
      no God will pay for it, soon or later... No won't be a godless alone
      trash person into an empty cult not even good for my ass such atheism,
      that offers them nothing. But emptiness and lonlyness for their
      miserabile godless alone life. No respect for them. They are just empty
      as their cult called atheism. But they will pay this soon or later, and
      all the emptiness for nothing they are facing in their ridicolous
      miserable alone life! It is time to throw on the trash empty atheism and
      godless alone trash people, they are not even worthless to clean shit.
      You can not respect them and their emptiness! It is over for you, trash
      is not even good to clean you of all this atheism BS. No respect for
      you. Let's really hope we can have a better generation and forget this
      godless alone trash one as quickly as possible. IT IS OVER, it is time
      for you and this nosense called atheism to go back from the nothing you
      come from. No respect for you. You will pay all this shit, soon or
      later...
      Today I will put your BS atheism in the toilet and flash it
      and you godless alone will shut up, ok? You are worthless and empty as
      your stupid cult. No respect for you.... This is the worst, weakest,
      empty generation, and when it will be over with their stupid empty cult
      called atheism none will complain it. IT'S IS OVER, godless alone
      trash.... Those godless alone poor people are playing with the fire, and
      they will pay for it, and even badly........
      They are so
      desperate and frustrated in and empty stupid life... No sorry for you.
      Let's hope in the next generation, let's hope in a better generation,
      and let's forget this one and trhow it on the trash with their stupid,
      nosense cult called atheism that will lead them anywhere. No respect for
      you again..... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GODLESS ALONE TRASH PEOPLE AND
      YOUR EMPTY STUPID ATHEISM NOT EVEN GOOD TO CLEAN THE DIRTIEST TOILET IN
      THE WORLD... You got no peace over there (and if God is real you will be
      and are f.... up.. You godless alone people are so weak).........
      God
      will care about you as well, poor person.... (you life is more
      miserable and empty without God, but you are so patetic to realize it).
      NO respect for you and your empty cult called atheism....... You are
      just frutrated,obsessed, miserable, alone godless person that does
      deserve any kind of respect, just to be so. (Lier as any
      Godenier)....... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GUYS, YOU AND YOUR STUPID EMPTY CULT
      ATHEISM That does not even deserve my piss….. all this just show how much those godless trash people are frustrated (to do not have what people have sacred and holly) no respect for them. it is time to throw away that empty BS cult called atheism that does not explain anything and it is not even good to clean the dirtiest toilet. Godless alone trash people, liars as an any Goddenier, dishonest and the worst and stupidest generation ever had. Let’s froget about this godless trash worthless generation and waiting for a better one. (By the way you will be judge as anyone alse once death by God, do not think you will escape because you deny him, as a godless alone rat as you are (You are also a disgusting godless ass kisser, that anytime you see a godlesss ass you run to kiss it. because you got no God and no dignity in your miserable godless life) NO RESPECT FOR YOU (your life is more empty and miserable without God, but you are the only fool to do not get it… WHY?)... this godless alone trash generation is the worst... Let's hope we can forget about them and have a better one. No respect for them and their stupid empty cult called atheism...... Godless weak people (you are weaker now and later ponce you will confront God, no matter what you sick people think about him)........... They do not deserve any respect, with their godless alone trash family who raised so trashy and sick to deny God. (and they will also pay fgor it, soon or later......... They got No God and no Dignity... something dies inside them when they stop to believe in God, but their are so patetic to admit... Soon or later they will stop to write empty shit on youtube about what we believe... Why? They are very weak, and quickly to change their mind about God... they are worthless people just like their empty atheism... but surelly they can not call theirselves atheists, but godless alone weak trash people. No respect for those liers or disgusting godless desperate ass kissers.... /they need to slpit on their dirthy mouth every morning as they deny God... but they are deceiving none but themselves, as they will paid for it, and be judge by God once death as anyone alse. (So it is better to be a son of God,m that a godless alone weak person).
      It is time to theow on the trash atheims (where it belong) and forget about this generation (have better people then them). God will take care about them as well, and I won't be in the place of those godless weak alone people and disguasting godless ass kisses...... They lost any dignity, denying God, no doubt about that........... they will pay for giving the back to God for this empty cult called atheism, soon or later... God will judge them as well. (they lost all dignity when they stopped to believe in God). No Dignity and no >>God, just a miserable alone godless life, to kiss godless alone ass. (The worst perople, the worst generation... None will cry once they will be over.....

  • @Benjva
    @Benjva 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Thank you Alex this was so thought provoking. You showed incredible journalistic and intellectual integrity here, and it's wonderful to see someone on any side of this conversation revealing such an allegiance to truth. I mean no disrespect, but I can't help but feel that you have far surpassed your guest in this regard. Please keep going!

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then do not tell me this is not a sick cult with godless ass kissers and godless alone trash people that are so obsessed with what other believe and the reflection of other people believe. No respect for those sick godless people.
      For Real? What kind of stupid empty cult is this nothing offer nothing gives, but empty BS? As God really cares about what you think and your stupid philosophy empty words as godless alone trash person (anyone who deny God is a godless alone trash person)… Another reason none can respect you, you are a lier as any modern Goddenier.. And we hope the next generation will be better then you and forget about you and your empty stupid worthless atheism not even worst to clean my ass. … you are just empty like it.
      Then why only godless alone trash people are obsessed with hell, while we are not? Another reason to do not be like them, and live with this constantly fear… What idiots!
      For really you did not get those empty Videos where godless alone people
      constantly talk about God, showing their obsession, are made not to
      help anyhow your godless alone life but to trap you into this empty
      stupid cult called atheism they know we live in the time of stupidity
      and godless trash people so they need to capture them as more as they
      can.
      They know you are the most stupid, weakest and alone people in
      the face of earth and they need to take advantages on you. They know you
      run anytime you see godless ass to kiss it. That what this empty BS
      cult atheism make you be, without God and without dignity. But let see
      how you are in trapped in this cult: Let see how many godless rats are
      here with their empty words and life, just as their cult called atheism.
      Why? Why Godless alone trash people want see the existence of God
      when it is clear that if they and all the things they see around (earth,
      stars, planets and so on) if they are creation something must created
      them. For real no respect for those godless blind trash people. God is
      what they do not know have and do not know in their miserable alone
      trash life. But God will take care about them as well, once death as
      anyone alse. Let's hope we will have better generation that those
      godless alone trash one.... We really do not need this empty and
      worthless cult called atheism and those modern godless alone idiots who
      thinks God cares to exist what those poor alone people think about him.
      No respect for them and their miserable godless alone life. (they are
      also godless ass kissers, as they run anytime they see a godless alone
      person... that what happen when you do not have God in your life, you
      lose your dignity, and you start to be disgusting in that way)... Oh
      anyway when you stopped to believe in God something died on you but you
      are so pathetic that you are not willing to admit it (right?). What
      trashy people without shame they deny their creator, and they will be
      judge for it.... Liars ad patetich as any Goddeniers. so their worthless
      empty life without him.... They are even the weakest people, because if
      they are wrong, they are the ones who will pay for denying God... Won't
      be in their shoes. No respect for them....
      I told you this godless
      is the worst generation (those people are just empty and worthless as
      the cult they are in), and when it will be gone with their stupid
      empty, worthless atheism that does not going anywhere, that do not offer
      or teach anything, none will complain about it, not even those very
      weak losers!!!!! ... Do not call them atheist but godless alone souless
      trash. Let's forget about those worthless empty people and their
      worthless and empty cult do not even good to clean the dirtiest motel.
      WHEN YOU WILL BE GONE NONE WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR STUPID CULt
      CALLED ATHEISM. You are the worst of people, no respect for you:...
      those are juss godless alone trash people, liers as any Godeniers with
      less thing sacred in their miserable alone godless life… those weak
      people are so weak and alone that they wait for an empty videos from an
      obsessed godless person to kiss his ass, disgustingly (no God, No
      Dignity) it would not change their life, actually more alone and empty,
      (they do not even have a real community) empty life they live empty shit
      they are in like this stupid cult called Atheism! No respect for them.
      (They are very weak, empty and frustrated people, a life that none will
      accepted, but those godless alone trash idiots).. those who say there is
      no God will pay for it, soon or later... No won't be a godless alone
      trash person into an empty cult not even good for my ass such atheism,
      that offers them nothing. But emptiness and lonlyness for their
      miserabile godless alone life. No respect for them. They are just empty
      as their cult called atheism. But they will pay this soon or later, and
      all the emptiness for nothing they are facing in their ridicolous
      miserable alone life! It is time to throw on the trash empty atheism and
      godless alone trash people, they are not even worthless to clean shit.
      You can not respect them and their emptiness! It is over for you, trash
      is not even good to clean you of all this atheism BS. No respect for
      you. Let's really hope we can have a better generation and forget this
      godless alone trash one as quickly as possible. IT IS OVER, it is time
      for you and this nosense called atheism to go back from the nothing you
      come from. No respect for you. You will pay all this shit, soon or
      later...
      Today I will put your BS atheism in the toilet and flash it
      and you godless alone will shut up, ok? You are worthless and empty as
      your stupid cult. No respect for you.... This is the worst, weakest,
      empty generation, and when it will be over with their stupid empty cult
      called atheism none will complain it. IT'S IS OVER, godless alone
      trash.... Those godless alone poor people are playing with the fire, and
      they will pay for it, and even badly........
      They are so
      desperate and frustrated in and empty stupid life... No sorry for you.
      Let's hope in the next generation, let's hope in a better generation,
      and let's forget this one and trhow it on the trash with their stupid,
      nosense cult called atheism that will lead them anywhere. No respect for
      you again..... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GODLESS ALONE TRASH PEOPLE AND
      YOUR EMPTY STUPID ATHEISM NOT EVEN GOOD TO CLEAN THE DIRTIEST TOILET IN
      THE WORLD... You got no peace over there (and if God is real you will be
      and are f.... up.. You godless alone people are so weak).........
      God
      will care about you as well, poor person.... (you life is more
      miserable and empty without God, but you are so patetic to realize it).
      NO respect for you and your empty cult called atheism....... You are
      just frutrated,obsessed, miserable, alone godless person that does
      deserve any kind of respect, just to be so. (Lier as any
      Godenier)....... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GUYS, YOU AND YOUR STUPID EMPTY CULT
      ATHEISM That does not even deserve my piss….. all this just show how much those godless trash people are frustrated (to do not have what people have sacred and holly) no respect for them. it is time to throw away that empty BS cult called atheism that does not explain anything and it is not even good to clean the dirtiest toilet. Godless alone trash people, liars as an any Goddenier, dishonest and the worst and stupidest generation ever had. Let’s froget about this godless trash worthless generation and waiting for a better one. (By the way you will be judge as anyone alse once death by God, do not think you will escape because you deny him, as a godless alone rat as you are (You are also a disgusting godless ass kisser, that anytime you see a godlesss ass you run to kiss it. because you got no God and no dignity in your miserable godless life) NO RESPECT FOR YOU (your life is more empty and miserable without God, but you are the only fool to do not get it… WHY?)... this godless alone trash generation is the worst... Let's hope we can forget about them and have a better one. No respect for them and their stupid empty cult called atheism...... Godless weak people (you are weaker now and later ponce you will confront God, no matter what you sick people think about him)........... They do not deserve any respect, with their godless alone trash family who raised so trashy and sick to deny God. (and they will also pay fgor it, soon or later......... They got No God and no Dignity... something dies inside them when they stop to believe in God, but their are so patetic to admit... Soon or later they will stop to write empty shit on youtube about what we believe... Why? They are very weak, and quickly to change their mind about God... they are worthless people just like their empty atheism... but surelly they can not call theirselves atheists, but godless alone weak trash people. No respect for those liers or disgusting godless desperate ass kissers.... /they need to slpit on their dirthy mouth every morning as they deny God... but they are deceiving none but themselves, as they will paid for it, and be judge by God once death as anyone alse. (So it is better to be a son of God,m that a godless alone weak person).
      It is time to theow on the trash atheims (where it belong) and forget about this generation (have better people then them). God will take care about them as well, and I won't be in the place of those godless weak alone people and disguasting godless ass kisses...... They lost any dignity, denying God, no doubt about that........... they will pay for giving the back to God for this empty cult called atheism, soon or later... God will judge them as well. (they lost all dignity when they stopped to believe in God). No Dignity and no >>God, just a miserable alone godless life, to kiss godless alone ass. (The worst perople, the worst generation... None will cry once they will be over....

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get justice

  • @TonyKeeh
    @TonyKeeh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Translation: "I am afraid to be exposed."

    • @mikeshivak
      @mikeshivak 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What he said was more: I have still not heard a good argument for the existence of God.

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Present any evidence for your god.

  • @charleslehner5715
    @charleslehner5715 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    “They don’t believe in Adam and Eve”
    Bill Craig literally has a series of lectures called argument for the historical Adam

    • @ManForToday
      @ManForToday 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Which you've obviously not watched

    • @billwalton4571
      @billwalton4571 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ManForToday youre a failure.

    • @yozkopf3000
      @yozkopf3000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ManForTodayCraig believes in an old earth and believes Adam and Eve were historical figures in the distant past. Based on current science he suspects them to be homo heidelbergensis (early himinins) that lived around 700.000 years ago. These stories in the old testament of the distant past like Genesis 1-11 - Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, Genesis 6 Sons of God, Henoch, Noah's flood, tower of Babel and such he interprets as mytho-history - the people in these stories are historical persons that really lived, but the stories are clothed in mythological motifs as was common practice in ancient Mesopotamian literature such as the Sumerian kings list in which the kings are real people, but the reigns of thousands of years are obviously mythological.

    • @greg77389
      @greg77389 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@ManForToday
      I have his book on the Historical Adam and have nearly finished it.

  • @LeoVital
    @LeoVital 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    Dawkins's words about apologists simply not having any good argument is exactly how I feel.
    No matter how sophisticated they are, it's all just unfalsifiable post-hoc rationalizations. Completely worthless to folks who do not already subscribe to their belief system. And inherently fallacious, since all of their arguments are based on special pleading and they don't apply the same burden of proof to the religious claims of other religions.
    It's all very silly.
    And he's also right about WLC having a despicable opinion on the God-commanded genocide of the Midianites. Which is a great representation of how religion can be used to justify absurdly immoral acts, and then rationalize them as moral.

    • @subhuman3408
      @subhuman3408 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      Atlast someone with brain in comments. That is the problem, these are post hoc rationalization, just like any pseudoscience. But no expected results.

    • @mpleandre
      @mpleandre 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@subhuman3408How exactly do you expect to have a "piece of God"? God itself is a logical concept. You need a beginning powerful, independent enough to make reality. That's it. You can't expect more from that. Doing so is dishonest. You either find an alternative to the God hypothesis, or stick to it.

    • @mitchjames9350
      @mitchjames9350 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Some theists have had good points but when it comes to the Abrahamic faiths there is no logic behind worshiping Yahweh/allah.

    • @TrentonMabry
      @TrentonMabry 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mitchjames9350why not?

    • @LeoVital
      @LeoVital 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@mitchjames9350 Oh, for sure, but "apologists" are generally defending a specific flavor of Theism related to some religion.
      Philosophical debates about the existence of a God are definitely possible with good-faith theists. The problem is when those theists try to act like the God of their religion is somehow "rational". Not only that, but "the most rational", which is very silly IMO.

  • @zbulmer
    @zbulmer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Nice work, Alex, on pressing Dawkins on this issue. WLC has been very critical of Dawkins published work (esp. The God Delusion) and has exposed his philosophical naivete. I don't blame him for wanting to avoid a debate with WLC. It would not go well for Dawkins.

    • @silent_shout
      @silent_shout 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      He’s pretending on this issue as well, because he will debate any Christian that clearly lacks debate skills or education.
      He’s like a boxer that has a high win average because he purposely picks less skilled boxers to fight.
      To act as if it’s because he’s too smart to debate anyone on this topic is clearly false, he’s done it his entire career.

    • @SuperEdge67
      @SuperEdge67 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@silent_shout What a load of nonsense. It’s not a game Dawkins is playing! He doesn’t care about ‘winning’ debates. He cares about the truth, is a passionate advocate for reason and cares about the damage fundamentalist religion does.

    • @richarddoan9172
      @richarddoan9172 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I'm an atheist, so I disagree with Craig, but he is a trained academic philosopher, whereas Dawkins is not.

    • @ramigilneas9274
      @ramigilneas9274 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Just like it didn’t go well for Craig when he debated actual historians or cosmologists where his naive intuitions aren’t considered to be evidence.
      Craig should debate Dawkins about the historicity of Adam and Eve… where his only argument would be that scientists are biased against the supernatural.😂

    • @zbulmer
      @zbulmer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@richarddoan9172 That's exactly why Dawkins should accept a debate with WLC instead of avoiding him. Dawkins' philosophy is amateur and he's completely oblivious to it. Why not have Dawkins defend his position from one of the best philosophers and debaters alive? It seems like that would be the academically honest thing to do.

  • @raqktranjan
    @raqktranjan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I'm agnostic myself, but still I wonder, what does the claim never having a challenging opponent may actually imply....hmmmm

    • @adam.fedale1370
      @adam.fedale1370 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Amen bro… ask God to reveal himself to you!

    • @adam.fedale1370
      @adam.fedale1370 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed… ask God to reveal himself to you!

    • @raqktranjan
      @raqktranjan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@adam.fedale1370 I'm quite certain God is too shy for that to happen, but I can understand.. I'm shy myself.

    • @marcocortes9968
      @marcocortes9968 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@raqktranjanGod is not shy. If demons tremble at the name of Jesus, He definitely isnt shy of a human 👍. If you truly want to have a relationship with him, you can.

    • @raqktranjan
      @raqktranjan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@marcocortes9968 That might be the most weird argument I have ever heard.. By religion I'm a Hindu, I'm allowed and even encouraged to doubt The existence and even the teachings of God(btw, people might think we have a lots of gods, but it is not that simple) . Ofc we can have a relationship with God if we want as a abstract being inside ourself.. Like a hope giving mechanism.. And btw, shy thing was a sarcastic comment, by which I have tried to imply that there's no way God's coming out, even though, he does, by which sense organ are we gonna sense him (I'm here talking about the Abrahamic God here)? Will he even be emperical? 😅

  • @-Thauma-
    @-Thauma- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    All that aside, I like how Alex looks like that he has just got out of bed

    • @omnipop4936
      @omnipop4936 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That's likely actually the case. 😂

    • @-Thauma-
      @-Thauma- 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@omnipop4936 probably ❤

    • @buckchile614
      @buckchile614 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's too young to use bed head as a ' look .'

  • @flightmasterr231
    @flightmasterr231 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    Richard Dawkins calling someone pompous is truly the kettle calling the pot black

    • @Kenny_Doyle
      @Kenny_Doyle 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂

    • @evancohen1503
      @evancohen1503 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re not used to the accent, hick.

    • @sadev101
      @sadev101 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      he is not pompous by any means.. he just has a cetain british accent. but the man is never been pompous... you must not follow him

    • @kellydalstok8900
      @kellydalstok8900 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      This is just the way many older educated Brits speak. Plus he always weighs his words very carefully.
      You must be American to confuse his accent with pompousness.

    • @flightmasterr231
      @flightmasterr231 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@kellydalstok8900 I am well acquainted with both many Brits and Dawkins' public speaking. I say again without hesitation that he is among the most pompous "public intellectuals" I know

  • @johnmulvey5121
    @johnmulvey5121 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +46

    As someone said earlier here, it is rich of Dawkins to describe someone as having a pompous voice. In his autobiography Dawkins repeatedly,time and time again reminds the reader that he (Dawkins ) is a ''Balliol man'' .
    In fairness to Alex, he point out that his experience of William Lane Craig was not how Dawkins describes.

    • @SamyasaSwi
      @SamyasaSwi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      I do think Alex was going easy on Craig those two times. Craig brings nothing interesting to the table.

    • @toucheturtle3840
      @toucheturtle3840 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t think how either of them think. Thinking in black & white is childlike. Religion is your answer…

    • @newnoggin2
      @newnoggin2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Dawkins voice is the opposite of pompous, but rather controlled and sophisticated. Try again.

    • @toucheturtle3840
      @toucheturtle3840 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@newnoggin2 your arrogance precedes you…

    • @SamyasaSwi
      @SamyasaSwi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@toucheturtle3840 not sure what you mean by that

  • @MojoPin1983
    @MojoPin1983 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interestingly, Alex, Craig, and Dawkins - among other prominent names - are supposed to share the same stage, in a panel discussion held at Pepperdine University, sometime this year. Behind the scenes details are still being worked out.

  • @francisb2278
    @francisb2278 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Alex, I feel you are completely honest in your efforts. Please remain honest.
    You also make things so intelligible for non-formally trained people like me. I am a Christian benefiting from your good work! 😊

  • @williamwallace3257
    @williamwallace3257 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Craig isn't as great as people think as he comes out with the usual script with no scientific evidence!

  • @whaddoyoumeme
    @whaddoyoumeme 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great interview, but let's be honest. We ALL know why Dawkins doesn't wanna debate WLC lol. Everyone knows it would end badly for him. Poor excuse from Dawkins.

  • @Jaryism
    @Jaryism 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    That's a load of projection if I've ever seen any... c'mon, not a single good argument? Even Alex would claim there's definitely some good ones, they made a tier list after all, not enough to convince him but it's kind of hard to stare at thousands of years of philosophy/theology from the Greeks to Acquinas and Leibniz and think it's all a bunch of garbage, smh.

    • @Simon-nv5zj
      @Simon-nv5zj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Whats your definition for good?

  • @zoniachimperium6410
    @zoniachimperium6410 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Also, if Dawkins has trouble with the debate format Craig is familiar with, avoiding important dialogue is not the answer. Rather, either they find a way to discuss where no one has an unfair advantage, or Dawkins improves his ability to navigate formal debate.

    • @davidmiles6845
      @davidmiles6845 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Based on what Dawkins said, it seems he doesn't respect William Craig and so why debate him? It's not like Craig is some kind of genius debater - Dawkins is not afraid of him he just doesn't want to waste his time.

    • @23045678
      @23045678 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why not? you dont have debates to make friends, but to make points for those watching. he's debated people he doesn't respect before, but suddenly craig is offlimits? i smell bullshit@@davidmiles6845

    • @EmeraldPixelGamingEPG
      @EmeraldPixelGamingEPG 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe debate him to disprove him? If you're so confident and sure of your beliefs, you shouldn't back out in any case. You should show the problem. Which he isn't doing, because he can't.

    • @richardevans560
      @richardevans560 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Dawkins has trouble with debating with anyone with more than a passing knowledge of the arguments.

    • @shaunhunterit342
      @shaunhunterit342 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidmiles6845 not "respecting" your opponent is not viewed as an excuse for not taking on an opponent in any sport, why should it be an excuse in debating?

  • @majesticpictures5715
    @majesticpictures5715 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +105

    Even Alex as a "devil's advocate" can beat Dawkins in a debate.

    • @subhuman3408
      @subhuman3408 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      That doesn't prove Dawkins is wrong though. Anyone with great oral skills can win a debate. It's not good method to get to truth.

    • @bolawilson1607
      @bolawilson1607 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      You are right but what I am driving at is that Dawkins doesn't reason like a philosopher. His arguments are never logically consistent, that's why he's scared to debate anyone with philosophical training or practice.

    • @curious_thinker
      @curious_thinker 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@bolawilson1607 How can Dawkins reason like a philosopher if he isn't a professional philosopher? He thinks like a scientist though and will never give credence to speculations and arguments which lack scentific evidence.

    • @ramigilneas9274
      @ramigilneas9274 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@bolawilson1607
      Dawkins doesn’t care about philosophical arguments… he cares about verifiable evidence.
      Most philosophers are Atheists so maybe those unverifiable arguments for the existence of gods simply aren’t good enough to convince the experts.😉

    • @assarefternamn5704
      @assarefternamn5704 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ⁠@@bolawilson1607But then the question becomes ”should he”? I would agree that philosophy got it’s place in the world, and especially in a religious context, but Dawkins oppose a different branch of religious claims than what you usually hear comming from WLC, which I would say is perfectly fine.

  • @1901elina
    @1901elina 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Pompously describing someone as "pompous" and explaining why he's above debating them 🙄
    Projection at its finest.

    • @herrbonk3635
      @herrbonk3635 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Not at all. Dawkins uses actual logic, instead of pompous word salads.
      Asking an aggressive "intellectual" beliver is like asking an AI robot.
      You get lots of words out of it, but if you know the slightest about the subject you can immediately see that it isn't even internally coherent.

  • @nicolasramirez3944
    @nicolasramirez3944 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Good pushback Alex! Great conversation, wonderfully polite and clear

  • @ameerthalgi6390
    @ameerthalgi6390 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Alex : why wont you debate William Craig
    Richard: ummmmmm ........
    For 10 minutes 😂😂

  • @divatalk9011
    @divatalk9011 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    I don’t agree with a great deal of what WLC says, he is a pretty scary debater though.
    Dawkins belittled WLC for using deductive reasoning which is strange. Then said he didn’t like his voice.
    This felt very out of character from Dawkins

    • @gsp3428
      @gsp3428 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Completely in character fro Dawkins, Dawkins is arrogant and full of himself, Craig couldnt be a more decent person. Always respectful, it is Dawkins who deep down knows he would get smashed in front of a live audience.

    • @GoldenMechaTiger
      @GoldenMechaTiger 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      @@gsp3428 You can't be a decent person and believe the things craig believes in sadly.

    • @UmbrellaGent
      @UmbrellaGent 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Out of character? To be fair, Dawkins has openly called for ridicule over debate with Christians.

    • @xxxtabamimingxxx6853
      @xxxtabamimingxxx6853 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He didn’t like the morals of the dude nothing wrong with that … thats why he don’t wanna debate the dude

    • @Indivus
      @Indivus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I've personally always found him to be the most arrogant debater of our time, so him saying WLC sounds "pompus" is the pinacle of irony

  • @jatticusfinch9015
    @jatticusfinch9015 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I think the main frustration any atheistically inclined debater would have is the admission of not knowing the kind of universe we happen to be in. Whereas, their opponent always knows the kind of universe they’re looking for. In the first case there are pieces to a puzzle that we don’t have the box for, the second knows the kind of puzzle they’re putting together.

    • @robwright8949
      @robwright8949 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I disagree. I think the theistic debater claims to know the type of universe we live in, but they have no basis of actually knowing. On that front, both debaters are in the same boat. No one actually knows.

    • @kennybachman35
      @kennybachman35 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      “Knows” is a strong word. 🤣

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kennybachman35Then do not tell me this is not a sick cult with godless ass kissers and godless alone trash people that are so obsessed with what other believe and the reflection of other people believe. No respect for those sick godless people.
      For Real? What kind of stupid empty cult is this nothing offer nothing gives, but empty BS? As God really cares about what you think and your stupid philosophy empty words as godless alone trash person (anyone who deny God is a godless alone trash person)… Another reason none can respect you, you are a lier as any modern Goddenier.. And we hope the next generation will be better then you and forget about you and your empty stupid worthless atheism not even worst to clean my ass. … you are just empty like it.
      Then why only godless alone trash people are obsessed with hell, while we are not? Another reason to do not be like them, and live with this constantly fear… What idiots!
      For really you did not get those empty Videos where godless alone people
      constantly talk about God, showing their obsession, are made not to
      help anyhow your godless alone life but to trap you into this empty
      stupid cult called atheism they know we live in the time of stupidity
      and godless trash people so they need to capture them as more as they
      can.
      They know you are the most stupid, weakest and alone people in
      the face of earth and they need to take advantages on you. They know you
      run anytime you see godless ass to kiss it. That what this empty BS
      cult atheism make you be, without God and without dignity. But let see
      how you are in trapped in this cult: Let see how many godless rats are
      here with their empty words and life, just as their cult called atheism.
      Why? Why Godless alone trash people want see the existence of God
      when it is clear that if they and all the things they see around (earth,
      stars, planets and so on) if they are creation something must created
      them. For real no respect for those godless blind trash people. God is
      what they do not know have and do not know in their miserable alone
      trash life. But God will take care about them as well, once death as
      anyone alse. Let's hope we will have better generation that those
      godless alone trash one.... We really do not need this empty and
      worthless cult called atheism and those modern godless alone idiots who
      thinks God cares to exist what those poor alone people think about him.
      No respect for them and their miserable godless alone life. (they are
      also godless ass kissers, as they run anytime they see a godless alone
      person... that what happen when you do not have God in your life, you
      lose your dignity, and you start to be disgusting in that way)... Oh
      anyway when you stopped to believe in God something died on you but you
      are so pathetic that you are not willing to admit it (right?). What
      trashy people without shame they deny their creator, and they will be
      judge for it.... Liars ad patetich as any Goddeniers. so their worthless
      empty life without him.... They are even the weakest people, because if
      they are wrong, they are the ones who will pay for denying God... Won't
      be in their shoes. No respect for them....
      I told you this godless
      is the worst generation (those people are just empty and worthless as
      the cult they are in), and when it will be gone with their stupid
      empty, worthless atheism that does not going anywhere, that do not offer
      or teach anything, none will complain about it, not even those very
      weak losers!!!!! ... Do not call them atheist but godless alone souless
      trash. Let's forget about those worthless empty people and their
      worthless and empty cult do not even good to clean the dirtiest motel.
      WHEN YOU WILL BE GONE NONE WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR STUPID CULt
      CALLED ATHEISM. You are the worst of people, no respect for you:...
      those are juss godless alone trash people, liers as any Godeniers with
      less thing sacred in their miserable alone godless life… those weak
      people are so weak and alone that they wait for an empty videos from an
      obsessed godless person to kiss his ass, disgustingly (no God, No
      Dignity) it would not change their life, actually more alone and empty,
      (they do not even have a real community) empty life they live empty shit
      they are in like this stupid cult called Atheism! No respect for them.
      (They are very weak, empty and frustrated people, a life that none will
      accepted, but those godless alone trash idiots).. those who say there is
      no God will pay for it, soon or later... No won't be a godless alone
      trash person into an empty cult not even good for my ass such atheism,
      that offers them nothing. But emptiness and lonlyness for their
      miserabile godless alone life. No respect for them. They are just empty
      as their cult called atheism. But they will pay this soon or later, and
      all the emptiness for nothing they are facing in their ridicolous
      miserable alone life! It is time to throw on the trash empty atheism and
      godless alone trash people, they are not even worthless to clean shit.
      You can not respect them and their emptiness! It is over for you, trash
      is not even good to clean you of all this atheism BS. No respect for
      you. Let's really hope we can have a better generation and forget this
      godless alone trash one as quickly as possible. IT IS OVER, it is time
      for you and this nosense called atheism to go back from the nothing you
      come from. No respect for you. You will pay all this shit, soon or
      later...
      Today I will put your BS atheism in the toilet and flash it
      and you godless alone will shut up, ok? You are worthless and empty as
      your stupid cult. No respect for you.... This is the worst, weakest,
      empty generation, and when it will be over with their stupid empty cult
      called atheism none will complain it. IT'S IS OVER, godless alone
      trash.... Those godless alone poor people are playing with the fire, and
      they will pay for it, and even badly........
      They are so
      desperate and frustrated in and empty stupid life... No sorry for you.
      Let's hope in the next generation, let's hope in a better generation,
      and let's forget this one and trhow it on the trash with their stupid,
      nosense cult called atheism that will lead them anywhere. No respect for
      you again..... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GODLESS ALONE TRASH PEOPLE AND
      YOUR EMPTY STUPID ATHEISM NOT EVEN GOOD TO CLEAN THE DIRTIEST TOILET IN
      THE WORLD... You got no peace over there (and if God is real you will be
      and are f.... up.. You godless alone people are so weak).........
      God
      will care about you as well, poor person.... (you life is more
      miserable and empty without God, but you are so patetic to realize it).
      NO respect for you and your empty cult called atheism....... You are
      just frutrated,obsessed, miserable, alone godless person that does
      deserve any kind of respect, just to be so. (Lier as any
      Godenier)....... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GUYS, YOU AND YOUR STUPID EMPTY CULT
      ATHEISM That does not even deserve my piss….. all this just show how much those godless trash people are frustrated (to do not have what people have sacred and holly) no respect for them. it is time to throw away that empty BS cult called atheism that does not explain anything and it is not even good to clean the dirtiest toilet. Godless alone trash people, liars as an any Goddenier, dishonest and the worst and stupidest generation ever had. Let’s froget about this godless trash worthless generation and waiting for a better one. (By the way you will be judge as anyone alse once death by God, do not think you will escape because you deny him, as a godless alone rat as you are (You are also a disgusting godless ass kisser, that anytime you see a godlesss ass you run to kiss it. because you got no God and no dignity in your miserable godless life) NO RESPECT FOR YOU (your life is more empty and miserable without God, but you are the only fool to do not get it… WHY?)... this godless alone trash generation is the worst... Let's hope we can forget about them and have a better one. No respect for them and their stupid empty cult called atheism...... Godless weak people (you are weaker now and later ponce you will confront God, no matter what you sick people think about him)........... They do not deserve any respect, with their godless alone trash family who raised so trashy and sick to deny God. (and they will also pay fgor it, soon or later......... They got No God and no Dignity... something dies inside them when they stop to believe in God, but their are so patetic to admit... Soon or later they will stop to write empty shit on youtube about what we believe... Why? They are very weak, and quickly to change their mind about God... they are worthless people just like their empty atheism... but surelly they can not call theirselves atheists, but godless alone weak trash people. No respect for those liers or disgusting godless desperate ass kissers.... /they need to slpit on their dirthy mouth every morning as they deny God... but they are deceiving none but themselves, as they will paid for it, and be judge by God once death as anyone alse. (So it is better to be a son of God,m that a godless alone weak person).
      It is time to theow on the trash atheims (where it belong) and forget about this generation (have better people then them). God will take care about them as well, and I won't be in the place of those godless weak alone people and disguasting godless ass kisses...... They lost any dignity, denying God, no doubt about that........... they will pay for giving the back to God for this empty cult called atheism, soon or later... God will judge them as well. (they lost all dignity when they stopped to believe in God). No Dignity and no >>God, just a miserable alone godless life, to kiss godless alone ass. (The worst perople, the worst generation... None will cry once they will be over....

    • @Mar-dk3mp
      @Mar-dk3mp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@robwright8949Then do not tell me this is not a sick cult with godless ass kissers and godless alone trash people that are so obsessed with what other believe and the reflection of other people believe. No respect for those sick godless people.
      For Real? What kind of stupid empty cult is this nothing offer nothing gives, but empty BS? As God really cares about what you think and your stupid philosophy empty words as godless alone trash person (anyone who deny God is a godless alone trash person)… Another reason none can respect you, you are a lier as any modern Goddenier.. And we hope the next generation will be better then you and forget about you and your empty stupid worthless atheism not even worst to clean my ass. … you are just empty like it.
      Then why only godless alone trash people are obsessed with hell, while we are not? Another reason to do not be like them, and live with this constantly fear… What idiots!
      For really you did not get those empty Videos where godless alone people
      constantly talk about God, showing their obsession, are made not to
      help anyhow your godless alone life but to trap you into this empty
      stupid cult called atheism they know we live in the time of stupidity
      and godless trash people so they need to capture them as more as they
      can.
      They know you are the most stupid, weakest and alone people in
      the face of earth and they need to take advantages on you. They know you
      run anytime you see godless ass to kiss it. That what this empty BS
      cult atheism make you be, without God and without dignity. But let see
      how you are in trapped in this cult: Let see how many godless rats are
      here with their empty words and life, just as their cult called atheism.
      Why? Why Godless alone trash people want see the existence of God
      when it is clear that if they and all the things they see around (earth,
      stars, planets and so on) if they are creation something must created
      them. For real no respect for those godless blind trash people. God is
      what they do not know have and do not know in their miserable alone
      trash life. But God will take care about them as well, once death as
      anyone alse. Let's hope we will have better generation that those
      godless alone trash one.... We really do not need this empty and
      worthless cult called atheism and those modern godless alone idiots who
      thinks God cares to exist what those poor alone people think about him.
      No respect for them and their miserable godless alone life. (they are
      also godless ass kissers, as they run anytime they see a godless alone
      person... that what happen when you do not have God in your life, you
      lose your dignity, and you start to be disgusting in that way)... Oh
      anyway when you stopped to believe in God something died on you but you
      are so pathetic that you are not willing to admit it (right?). What
      trashy people without shame they deny their creator, and they will be
      judge for it.... Liars ad patetich as any Goddeniers. so their worthless
      empty life without him.... They are even the weakest people, because if
      they are wrong, they are the ones who will pay for denying God... Won't
      be in their shoes. No respect for them....
      I told you this godless
      is the worst generation (those people are just empty and worthless as
      the cult they are in), and when it will be gone with their stupid
      empty, worthless atheism that does not going anywhere, that do not offer
      or teach anything, none will complain about it, not even those very
      weak losers!!!!! ... Do not call them atheist but godless alone souless
      trash. Let's forget about those worthless empty people and their
      worthless and empty cult do not even good to clean the dirtiest motel.
      WHEN YOU WILL BE GONE NONE WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR STUPID CULt
      CALLED ATHEISM. You are the worst of people, no respect for you:...
      those are juss godless alone trash people, liers as any Godeniers with
      less thing sacred in their miserable alone godless life… those weak
      people are so weak and alone that they wait for an empty videos from an
      obsessed godless person to kiss his ass, disgustingly (no God, No
      Dignity) it would not change their life, actually more alone and empty,
      (they do not even have a real community) empty life they live empty shit
      they are in like this stupid cult called Atheism! No respect for them.
      (They are very weak, empty and frustrated people, a life that none will
      accepted, but those godless alone trash idiots).. those who say there is
      no God will pay for it, soon or later... No won't be a godless alone
      trash person into an empty cult not even good for my ass such atheism,
      that offers them nothing. But emptiness and lonlyness for their
      miserabile godless alone life. No respect for them. They are just empty
      as their cult called atheism. But they will pay this soon or later, and
      all the emptiness for nothing they are facing in their ridicolous
      miserable alone life! It is time to throw on the trash empty atheism and
      godless alone trash people, they are not even worthless to clean shit.
      You can not respect them and their emptiness! It is over for you, trash
      is not even good to clean you of all this atheism BS. No respect for
      you. Let's really hope we can have a better generation and forget this
      godless alone trash one as quickly as possible. IT IS OVER, it is time
      for you and this nosense called atheism to go back from the nothing you
      come from. No respect for you. You will pay all this shit, soon or
      later...
      Today I will put your BS atheism in the toilet and flash it
      and you godless alone will shut up, ok? You are worthless and empty as
      your stupid cult. No respect for you.... This is the worst, weakest,
      empty generation, and when it will be over with their stupid empty cult
      called atheism none will complain it. IT'S IS OVER, godless alone
      trash.... Those godless alone poor people are playing with the fire, and
      they will pay for it, and even badly........
      They are so
      desperate and frustrated in and empty stupid life... No sorry for you.
      Let's hope in the next generation, let's hope in a better generation,
      and let's forget this one and trhow it on the trash with their stupid,
      nosense cult called atheism that will lead them anywhere. No respect for
      you again..... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GODLESS ALONE TRASH PEOPLE AND
      YOUR EMPTY STUPID ATHEISM NOT EVEN GOOD TO CLEAN THE DIRTIEST TOILET IN
      THE WORLD... You got no peace over there (and if God is real you will be
      and are f.... up.. You godless alone people are so weak).........
      God
      will care about you as well, poor person.... (you life is more
      miserable and empty without God, but you are so patetic to realize it).
      NO respect for you and your empty cult called atheism....... You are
      just frutrated,obsessed, miserable, alone godless person that does
      deserve any kind of respect, just to be so. (Lier as any
      Godenier)....... IT IS OVER FOR YOU GUYS, YOU AND YOUR STUPID EMPTY CULT
      ATHEISM That does not even deserve my piss….. all this just show how much those godless trash people are frustrated (to do not have what people have sacred and holly) no respect for them. it is time to throw away that empty BS cult called atheism that does not explain anything and it is not even good to clean the dirtiest toilet. Godless alone trash people, liars as an any Goddenier, dishonest and the worst and stupidest generation ever had. Let’s froget about this godless trash worthless generation and waiting for a better one. (By the way you will be judge as anyone alse once death by God, do not think you will escape because you deny him, as a godless alone rat as you are (You are also a disgusting godless ass kisser, that anytime you see a godlesss ass you run to kiss it. because you got no God and no dignity in your miserable godless life) NO RESPECT FOR YOU (your life is more empty and miserable without God, but you are the only fool to do not get it… WHY?)... this godless alone trash generation is the worst... Let's hope we can forget about them and have a better one. No respect for them and their stupid empty cult called atheism...... Godless weak people (you are weaker now and later ponce you will confront God, no matter what you sick people think about him)........... They do not deserve any respect, with their godless alone trash family who raised so trashy and sick to deny God. (and they will also pay fgor it, soon or later......... They got No God and no Dignity... something dies inside them when they stop to believe in God, but their are so patetic to admit... Soon or later they will stop to write empty shit on youtube about what we believe... Why? They are very weak, and quickly to change their mind about God... they are worthless people just like their empty atheism... but surelly they can not call theirselves atheists, but godless alone weak trash people. No respect for those liers or disgusting godless desperate ass kissers.... /they need to slpit on their dirthy mouth every morning as they deny God... but they are deceiving none but themselves, as they will paid for it, and be judge by God once death as anyone alse. (So it is better to be a son of God,m that a godless alone weak person).
      It is time to theow on the trash atheims (where it belong) and forget about this generation (have better people then them). God will take care about them as well, and I won't be in the place of those godless weak alone people and disguasting godless ass kisses...... They lost any dignity, denying God, no doubt about that........... they will pay for giving the back to God for this empty cult called atheism, soon or later... God will judge them as well. (they lost all dignity when they stopped to believe in God). No Dignity and no >>God, just a miserable alone godless life, to kiss godless alone ass. (The worst perople, the worst generation... None will cry once they will be over.....

    • @BobDingus-bh3pd
      @BobDingus-bh3pd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You say you don’t know what type of universe we’re in. And that you don’t have all the pieces to the puzzle. Then the moment someone hypothesizes a casual creator you deny it with impolite certainty.

  • @JonathanOelkers
    @JonathanOelkers 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Seems like Dawkins is using something WLC said about the OT as a smoke screen to hide the fact that he was afraid to debate him. Perhaps this is because he knew he could not contend with him… Also interesting to see Alex interact with one of the guys who first inspired his atheism. Now that Alex is so much stronger in philosophy, he must realize that Dawkins doesn’t really have much to offer beyond a solid commitment to materialism and skepticism. I wonder if deep down it’s hard for Alex to see this kind of shallow academic commitment from one of his early heros.

    • @MS-xe1es
      @MS-xe1es 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You've got it all exactly correct.

    • @sammcloughlin1578
      @sammcloughlin1578 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      boom, mic drop.

    • @encych5984
      @encych5984 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He doesn't have anything to offer apart from materialism because he is a biologist....perhaps he should never really gone into religious wars!
      In everyday life biology has life and death consequences as opposed to philosophy/religion/God.

    • @prykris
      @prykris 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      If Christianity were real, no debates would be necessary

    • @davispg
      @davispg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@prykrispeople debate evolution... does that make it not real?

  • @bethezebra
    @bethezebra 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    "I won't debate a certain christian because his viewpoints are evil. My materialist worldview doesn't allow for evil to be anything but subjective, but I'm happy to ignore that." 😂

    • @Horace__63
      @Horace__63 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      When is jdaddy coming back?

    • @bethezebra
      @bethezebra 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Horace__63 🤔 maybe around the time you learn how to spell? EDIT: oh, nice. You edited. Lol

    • @gedonckers
      @gedonckers 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So, evil is objective only if God exists? But, is evil evil because God thinks so, or does God find evil evil because it is evil? (just riffing on Eutyphro). Anyway, there is no particular reason why evil should be metaphysically objective. It's not like people are evil only when they think there is no divine punishment. Plenty of evil has been done in the name of some 'objective' good (by theists and atheists alike).

    • @bethezebra
      @bethezebra 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gedonckers you tell me. what is evil?

    • @gedonckers
      @gedonckers 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bethezebra I'll give you three secular views: 1) evil is intentional causing of harm, 2) evil is acting against moral law, 3) evil is acting viciously (where vices are defined as traits of character that are at the extremes - cowardice, injustice, etc). These are just three prominent views - utilitarian, kant's and aristotles. There are many others. E.g. you can check out Dancy's 'Ethics without principles'.

  • @rafikgl
    @rafikgl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    When you are faced with a situation where you are asked to debate WLC. You have only two choices:
    1) Accept and be publicly humiliated and lose all the glory and fame and pride you gained all your life.
    2) Reject and give some silly excuse, hoping that at least some of your followers are stupid enough to believe you.
    Dawkins wisely and cowardly chose the latter.

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      WLC has awful arguments.
      Go on, give his best argument that you've ever heard...

    • @adamduarte895
      @adamduarte895 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@killerrabbit2693only an internet atheist says this lol

    • @epicofgilgamesh9964
      @epicofgilgamesh9964 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@adamduarte895 You mean how like Low Bar Bill got exposed by Sean Carroll on his lack of knowledge on cosmology?
      This is the difference between atheists and theists. Atheists are the rational ones because they demand sufficient evidence before believing. Theists blindly accept "holy" books written by people who thought the Earth was flat and covered by a solid dome and choose emotion over logic.
      Look up the below from a Biblical scholar:
      *"Genesis 1:9-10 - God Creates Dry Land not the Planet Earth!"* - Dr Steven DiMattei
      If you want to believe in a higher power, fine. I'm open to the idea. Just realise that your position is not evidence based. And speculation, special pleading and "look at the trees" doesn't help you either.

    • @MontyCantsin5
      @MontyCantsin5 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @rafikgl: Completely wrong. Have you watched WLC debate someone like Hitchens? On one occasion WLC struggled to understand the meaning of the word atheist. He’s dreadful.

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@adamduarte895
      Do you even know what an atheist is?

  • @jamesmg4694
    @jamesmg4694 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Oh dear! for someone who doesn't believe in good and evil how on earth can't he see his self deception and self contradiction!

  • @michal88gno
    @michal88gno 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Alex, you are a very smart human being. Thank you for your work. I am atheist since transformation just after reading your guest's book God Delusion and left religion. Now I am happy, free person feeling like throw out a stone from my stomach.

    • @adriansims9770
      @adriansims9770 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hmm, OK, but TGD isn't especially convincing. RD is wrong on his 'if God made man, who made God' argument'. What I find unconvincing about Christianity is the absurdity of the atonement.

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get justice

    • @JohnnyBeeDawg
      @JohnnyBeeDawg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And bound for hell by rejecting what God said. You are saved when you believe and take God at his word. Believing your creator and accepting his free gift of redemption is true freedom.

    • @wet-read
      @wet-read วันที่ผ่านมา

      That's good, but now it is time for better books.

  • @MSA-uj7cp
    @MSA-uj7cp 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    Dawkins lack of knowledge in the field would have been exposed by WLC. That is why he gives a really poor excuse for not debating him.... Alex's questions bring out Dawkins' inconsistencies.

    • @epicofgilgamesh9964
      @epicofgilgamesh9964 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Low Bar Bill's lack of knowledge on cosmology was exposed by Sean Carroll. Doesn't seem to stop him using the same arguments though.

    • @mario7frankielee
      @mario7frankielee 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      as i said earlier
      god is so big he doesn’t have to exist!
      think about it!

  • @christianbjrnskov3642
    @christianbjrnskov3642 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I was not debated Craig. He was a stage with him on e together with a lot of other people in Mexico. One guy from the atheist canceled his participation from the panel and Dawkins said yes to replace him not knowing Craig would be in the panel

  • @tomschmatzhagen990
    @tomschmatzhagen990 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I don't know about "debate", but counterfactually would have had been something to see Dawkins and GK Chesterton in conversation,

  • @jesterlead
    @jesterlead 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Dawkins doesn't consider theists' as an adversary in the same way you wouldn't concern yourself with the rhetoric skills of a flat-earther or someone that believes in the tooth fairy.

  • @gingrai00
    @gingrai00 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Thank you Alex. Your dialogues with WLC are some of my favorite and my experience with him is similar to yours. Craig is a kind, sincere, and humble person. Listening to the bombastic Dawkins act as if Craig were lacking humility is rich.

    • @mram03
      @mram03 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Alex is wonderful. Great respect for him as he always engages kindly with the other side. Frankly, this is my opinion of Dawkins: he is putting on a facade of humility. Personalities clash, but Craig & Alex have had great conversations, while Dawkins true pride becomes clear. He apparently doesn’t “respect” Craig enough to debate him, but unless someone is an obnoxious jerk who interrupts and gets angry, there isn’t really a reason to have even a discussion! Dawkins comes off as arrogant by claiming Craig speaks pompously, when in fact, he does the exact same thing! “Premise 1” is part of breaking down an argument! So imo, this is just showcasing the arrogance of Dawkins feeling “better” than Craig, who’s purportedly not “worth his time.” 😒

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's WLC's best piece of evidence/ argument for the existence of any god...

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mram03
      You missed the part where WLC justified mass slaughter along with mass child slaughter....

  • @paulsparks4564
    @paulsparks4564 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I think it would be a waste of time debating WLC anyway, as he constantly trots out the same time-worn arguments for god's existence. That's why I loved Hitchens' debate with him at Biola, where Hitch goes off the debate format and starts to throw various faith-challenging scenarios at him. You may have found WLC a nice guy Alex, but you stayed within comfortable boundaries and didn't challenge him. I find him to be intellectually bankrupt, as he cannot allow reason and/or logic to damage any of his pre-supp faith-based positions.

    • @boringbiblestudy1813
      @boringbiblestudy1813 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      WLC is explicitly against pre-suppositonailism because it’s circular logic.

    • @lastnamefirstname850
      @lastnamefirstname850 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If you agree to debate someone and during the debate you change the rules don't be shocked the other person lost their temper.

    • @mitchjames9350
      @mitchjames9350 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There are top notch scientists who believe in a higher power and not necessarily Yahweh.

    • @loganleatherman7647
      @loganleatherman7647 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @mitchjames9350
      So what? Lots of intellectual people still need a refuge for their emotional comfort and/or existential security. This is just a human blind spot and says nothing of any actual truth of the matter outside of theism being useful for emotional comfort and/or existential security

    • @ndudujohn345
      @ndudujohn345 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@loganleatherman7647Scientists (and you seem to love science) ten times smarter than you come to a conclusion and you dismiss it with your absolute certainty about what religion is about.
      Your display is a thorough example of cognitive bias no matter how much you lots pretend to embrace rationality.

  • @samsmith4902
    @samsmith4902 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +155

    Whether you’re an atheist or religious, to say that the other side has no good points is just dishonest. I found Dawkins response just distasteful, and Alex rightly pointed out his hypocrisy by the fact he’s debated people like John Lennox but won’t debate Craig.

    • @joelhall5124
      @joelhall5124 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      In fairness, Dawkins said whatever evidence he saw for himself, even if god spoke to him and proved existence, he'd reject anyway.
      Which is a dishonest starting point.

    • @Downfall1990
      @Downfall1990 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      William Lane Craig exposed some of Dawkins points. I think especially the generic fallacy and Dawkins knew he would get exposed and so won’t play that game.
      Dawkins likes to win, it’s obvious

    • @waltpowell7254
      @waltpowell7254 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Anything to do with God's have no good points.

    • @littlebitofhope1489
      @littlebitofhope1489 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Oh please, you could tell he was just being polite. Dawkins is 82. He has earned the right to do whatever he wants whenever he wants to. If he doesn't want to wast time with WLC, I don't blame him a bit.

    • @littlebitofhope1489
      @littlebitofhope1489 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      @@joelhall5124 Claiming to see or hear something is not proving existence.

  • @martinsolorzano9071
    @martinsolorzano9071 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, a newfound respect for Alex after watching this clip. As a new subscriber, and a Christian, I really enjoy listening to you. Right on.

  • @calldwnthesky6495
    @calldwnthesky6495 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ay mr. o'connor, was it really necessary to use the term "new atheist"? (one of the christian apologists favorite terms of all time) sometimes i really wonder about you

  • @threestars2164
    @threestars2164 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Would an aramaic-speaking rabbi preaching around Judea two thousand years ago understand William Lane Craig? Probably not.

  • @kierharris976
    @kierharris976 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    "I don't want to sound arrogant but there are no good arguments for the other side of the debate."
    😂😂😂

    • @SamoaVsEverybody814
      @SamoaVsEverybody814 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Name one.

    • @jimwimmer3490
      @jimwimmer3490 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      He's correct.

    • @subhuman3408
      @subhuman3408 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You are making it as if he wrong

    • @SamyasaSwi
      @SamyasaSwi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm hoping the emojis mean you agree with him...

    • @LifesEssentials8857
      @LifesEssentials8857 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@subhuman3408 give me a bible verse you think is problematic and I will explain it to you through reasoning

  • @inamullah6455
    @inamullah6455 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    if the first 2 premise are true then deduction that follows from it is necessarily true arguing against deductive logic is arguing against reason

  • @faizanqadir7407
    @faizanqadir7407 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Summary "I don't want to debate him"

  • @subhuman3408
    @subhuman3408 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Even if we grant their argument, they still can't rule out deism from their specific religion. Literally all religions can be justified using their criteria

    • @avatarmufasa3628
      @avatarmufasa3628 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not really. Actively saying "I believe in X" is not the same as "I cant rule out X".
      For all I know, theres a flying pig underground on mars. From a science perspective, we arent really gonna consider that, because its not testable. And deism here isnt testable, so its not worth considering. If someone were to believe in something without sufficient evidence, thats where the logic is faulty

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get justice

    • @TEFFTPATTERN
      @TEFFTPATTERN 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Debating on whether or not there is a god and debating what that god is are 2 different debates. Apologists wouldn’t bother to add a whole extra argument into a debate that doesn’t ask for it

    • @subhuman3408
      @subhuman3408 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TEFFTPATTERN But apologists wants us to convert to their specific religion. So they are required to give an argument exclusive to their religion.

    • @asdfghjkl2261
      @asdfghjkl2261 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agreed. I don't really have an issue with some sort of transcendent first cause. But how on Earth are you supposed to know it's the Christian God?

  • @franciscociddasilva3934
    @franciscociddasilva3934 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    So... he won't debate him because he uses deductive reasoning and his voice sounds weird?

  • @Robert-yc9ql
    @Robert-yc9ql 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    I had to laugh at the outright honesty you got at 9;26.
    That kind of sharing is worthy of respect, at the very least.
    Mr. Dawkins is slowing, but as a pioneer who swam against a very heavy current, I cannot help but still admire the man.
    Nicely done. 😊

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get justice

    • @suntzu7727
      @suntzu7727 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      A pioneer in bad arguments and criticizing thinkers he hasn't even read?

    • @cb25
      @cb25 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@suntzu7727 absolutely

    • @davidhiggen3029
      @davidhiggen3029 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is, but Alex sure does talk over him a lot in this video.

    • @richardevans560
      @richardevans560 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pioneer of what, exactly? Do you believe he came up with any new arguments for atheism? I can tell you he didn't. Not only that he didn't even read the Bible to check his "facts"

  • @mertalrooth01
    @mertalrooth01 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So cool you got to sit with this legend.

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get my justice

    • @johnalbent
      @johnalbent 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Alex is a legend and Dawkins is lucky to sit with him 😉

  • @alexrdy1986
    @alexrdy1986 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Superb pushback, Alex. At least Dawkins was honest and outright said that the reason is he dislikes WLC, and didn't attempt to hide it.

    • @arjunratnadev
      @arjunratnadev 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      well WLC was thoroughly flushed out by Mr. Christopher Hitchens, you can refer to that, there is no point in arguing with moronic religious nutters but it must be done when necessary

    • @The07vinny
      @The07vinny 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Well he did attempt to hide it but Alex pushed it out of him by the end.

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get justice

    • @KJS988
      @KJS988 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I really don't think that's his 'honest' reason for not debating him. My two cents is he's hiding behind his feigned indignation

  • @silent_shout
    @silent_shout 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +55

    Avoiding WLC his entire career was an extremely smart business move on Dawkins’ part. His philosophic wheelhouse is definitely people without college degrees.

    • @homeskillet9802
      @homeskillet9802 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      We all know, the only reason he won't debate Craig is because he knows he would lose. Let's stop pretending.

    • @pauliethemushroomman
      @pauliethemushroomman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I agree. It’s all about who would gain status. Dawkins was smart not to allow WLC to gain status at his expense.

    • @alexanderlaird6206
      @alexanderlaird6206 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@pauliethemushroomman Well it would certainly have been at his expense, at any rate.

    • @Raydensheraj
      @Raydensheraj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You Christians are funny....Craig has been laughed at since his pathetic debate with Sean Carroll concerning his goofy Monologues on his preferred version of invisible supernatural super being creating the galactic universe creation style.
      Why debate a propagandist paid by certain "Institutions" to repeat arguments that are outrageously weak. Maybe a confirmation biased Christian thinks Craig's stuff is profound....
      Philosophical mumbo jumbo isn't "empirical material testable verifiable FACTS" and I wished you religious indoctrinated would stop acting like philosophical mumbo jumbo is something convincing - especially to educated adults that actually have read more than just one book.
      I totally agree with Richard Dawkins. There's nothing interesting or actually profound coming from evangelical propagandist William Lame Craig.
      Accept of course you are already convinced that your specific version of invisible supernatural super being is the one that created Crohn's disease, spontaneous natural abortions causing billions of spontaneous natural abortions and miscarriages....and other great creations like wisdom teeth or Proteus syndrome....

    • @charlescheeseborough298
      @charlescheeseborough298 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@homeskillet9802😂😂😂😂

  • @mariosuarez3411
    @mariosuarez3411 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    WLC is definitely more adept at philosophical debates than Dawkins, but he really dropped the ball when he recently claimed that he "lowers the bar" for Christianity. He has also claimed that if he had been told that Christianity offers a 1 in a million chance of being true (or something like that), that he could not pass up on those odds. Basically, WLC admits that he's only a Christian because Christians got to him first before Muslims, Jews or other religions that would offer similar or better odds.

    • @ultracrepiderian
      @ultracrepiderian 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Tell me u have never heard wlc speak without telling me uve never heard him speak
      He very clearly says that other religions, he specified Islam in that particular debate, they don't have even close to the amount of evidence Christianity does
      To compare the enormous amount of evidence for Christianity with any other religion, u would have to be brain-dead
      I didn't even make such arguments when I was an atheist 😂

    • @NationalPK
      @NationalPK 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re an idiot stop commenting please

    • @sharplikecheddar2
      @sharplikecheddar2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm sorry but please cite where WLC claims/indicates that he would have been Muslim or another religion if they got to him first. That does not at all align with his personal testimony, his doctorate studies, nor his catalogue of authored books, speeches, debates, and so on.
      One of WLC biggest theological claims is the shock and extensive evidence he found for Jesus' death and resurrections while doing his doctorate studies. The Quran denies Christs death on the cross and resurrections - two claims that WLC defends vigorously and claims have strong historical evidence among both believers and non-believers.
      This does not sound like a man who based his decision on a first come first serve basis or implied odds but I am willing to be corrected here.

    • @mariosuarez3411
      @mariosuarez3411 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ultracrepiderian If I remember correctly, that particular instance was from a podcast, not from a debate. Same podcast where he mentions that he lowers the bar for Christianity, which you conveniently chose not to address. I've heard WLC speak plenty of times and I was not comparing the evidence of one religion vs another. I was addressing two rather weak arguments by WLC.

    • @timpedro2606
      @timpedro2606 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You might find it helpful to listen to WLC’s follow up responses after he made those particular remarks you’re referencing. I felt it provided sufficient clarification. I’d shy away from viewing only rationally rules content on the matter. Best to hear from the direct source. WLC most certainly has not admitted he’d just as likely believe any of the other religions you mentioned had he had exposure to them first. If he has, provide sources.

  • @aaronstypes4083
    @aaronstypes4083 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    After deflecting about why he won't debate William Lane Craig and giving every miniscule reason, it would be funny if Dawkins then simply said, "Well, to be honest, Alex. . . I'm afraid William Craig will kick my butt--that's the bottom line, I guess."

    • @Darfail
      @Darfail 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Craig would lose as always and use the cheapest sophistry and act pompous and victorious, that's all he ever does and ever will do. Utter nonsense for dull minds.

    • @aaronstypes4083
      @aaronstypes4083 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@Darfail Yeah, I'm sure that's why Dawkins won't debate him. Because it would be a slam dunk victory for him and why would he want a slam dunk victory?

    • @Darfail
      @Darfail 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @aaronstypes4083 Craig's delusional audience will always think he won no matter what. As dishonest and full of cheap tactics as he is, he isn't worth anyone's time, like the rest of these Christian sophists. The best use of Craig is to show non-cultists what they are really up against and this has been done countless times already.

    • @Wolf-ln1ml
      @Wolf-ln1ml 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Craig is good at exactly one thing when it comes to debates like this - to bamboozle people who only have casual knowledge about the topic. He is really good at making his stance _appear_ to be oh-so-educated and valid by employing various debating tactics that are _only_ good for exactly that.
      Hell, until I started to actually look into these things a good bit deeper, I couldn't find any fault in his _arguments,_ I only had a bad taste in my mouth about his methods, without being able to point at anything in particular that was actually bad or faulty. I would _absolutely_ have lost any debate against him, simply because I couldn't see through his tactics. Hell, I'm pretty sure that he'd still be able to pull _some_ tactic out of his bag of tricks to run me over. But that still would simply be that - debate tactics. He's a good showman, but a really, _*really_ bad scientist _when it comes to these debates,_ in part exactly _because_ he using dishonest tactics (whether he is aware of the dishonesty or not doesn't even matter; people lie to themselves often and long enough to believe their own lies, that doesn't mean they're not still dishonest)

    • @ndudujohn345
      @ndudujohn345 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Wolf-ln1mlSam Harris and many atheists who have debated him won't agree... I'll take their views over a TH-cam comment.

  • @elkhuntr2816
    @elkhuntr2816 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    That's because William Lane Craig destroyed him in his debate and considers Dawkins "sophmoric" in his arguments. He critiqued dawkins book "The god delusion" and said he was really surprised at his arguments and lack of sophistication and logical fallacies.

    • @philpaine3068
      @philpaine3068 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How gullible you are. Craig's dishonesty is palpable, and his arrogant pomposity disgusting. He couldn't "critique" anything intelligently if his life depended on it, and his "sophistication" is on a kindergarden level. As for logical fallacies --- Craig's have been exposed time and again. His smarmy recycling of the medieval Islamic Kallam is laughable. Even Christian theologians in the middle ages knew it was idiotic.

    • @lightbearer313
      @lightbearer313 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So, what are these" logical fallacies"? Do you know that sophistication is a very peculiar term, and one of its meanings is 'to be corrupted'?

    • @philpaine3068
      @philpaine3068 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lightbearer313 Groan! Go to the nearest university and find any trained logician or philosopher. They will probably never have heard of Craig. Show them Craig's ramshackle, flatulant, "syllogism" and they will laugh in your face. Craig is not a philosopher or a thinker or anything even remotely resembling an expert on anything. He survives only in the echo chamber of gullible and naive religious fanatics.

    • @elkhuntr2816
      @elkhuntr2816 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lightbearer313 "So, what are these" logical fallacies"?" Dawkins has been widely criticized by his own side even the likes of sam harris and the press for his excuses to not debate craig. He has been accused of not being an intellectual and willing to debate. Other sources have said he was really embarrased after his debate with John Lennox and his performance there. Other sources have indicated he will not debate another philosopher because he knows he is really weak in philosophy, constructing logical arguments based on premises and conclusions that logically follow. Its embarrasing to him. One example of a logical fallacy he loves to use is when he accuses people of only believing in a religion because of where they were born and how they were raised. To conclude someones belief is false because of how they came to that belief would be the genetic fallacy.

  • @rodneyblackwell7477
    @rodneyblackwell7477 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I suspect WLC may have mellowed a little over time.
    As to the Midianite slaughter something along those lines may well have happened. The real issue is whether or not God instructed this.

    • @loganleatherman7647
      @loganleatherman7647 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s the real problem though. God simply can’t be “all good”, as most modern Christians claim him to be, and also order the brutal killing of a whole tribe of people when he himself is supposedly omnipotent and could just make them disappear or painlessly disintegrate or whatever instead of being slaughtered
      The fact that “God” doesn’t think of better ways to do things is what makes me think that “God’s mind” is rather that of some 2,000 B.C.E. - 500 C.E. men who only knew what their particular period in history on their particular patch of the earth held as worldviews and facts about reality

  • @jld369
    @jld369 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Much better clip than that YT Short of this segment. Excellent and appropriate pushback!

  • @rafikgl
    @rafikgl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I knew Dawkins would mention WLC. He is terrified of him.

  • @stephenthompson9722
    @stephenthompson9722 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You don't want to sound arrogant but you do.....
    Does anyone remember when Richard was on Australian Q and A and he was laughed at when questioned about nothing?
    Sometimes Richard sounds proud and arrogant too. What a silly argument when you do it too.

    • @lightbearer313
      @lightbearer313 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, I don't remember that, because it is highly doubtful that that happened. If people did laugh, it was with him not at him.

    • @stephenthompson9722
      @stephenthompson9722 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@lightbearer313 search for it!!!!I've seen the video many times on TH-cam. If you don't search for it then you are blindly following.

  • @seedofwonder
    @seedofwonder 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    As a Christian Alex really challenges me. Dawkins never ever did.

    • @brianfergus839
      @brianfergus839 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      0:45

    • @fbdjfiir
      @fbdjfiir 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amen!

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You should focus on the arguments and logic proposed. Not the person.
      Belief in an undetectable being is bonkers, and how anyone believes in such things after childhood is beyond me.

    • @seedofwonder
      @seedofwonder 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@killerrabbit2693 I do. Dawkins doesn't make any. That's why Alex is so compelling.

    • @killerrabbit2693
      @killerrabbit2693 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@seedofwonder
      You don't.
      Dawkins has explained in detail why baseless belief has no place in grown up thinking.
      No one should focus on who's making the argument, just the argument.

  • @willdennis6020
    @willdennis6020 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm suprised he didn't mention the fact that Craig is a master of the gish gallop technique. Which in a timed debate is perfect for him. He simply overwhelms the audience and his opponents with so many half-baked ideas that rarely i) argue his opponents argument directly or ii) fit as a cohesive argument to the debate question. Is he hard to debate? Yes. Does it mean he has good arguments? Not in the least

    • @AnonAmong
      @AnonAmong 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cope harder

  • @logicweaver7152
    @logicweaver7152 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You should watch Jeffrey Lang's talk on `The purpose of Life`. In it he gives a theistic perspective on why God allows suffering.

  • @alisterrebelo9013
    @alisterrebelo9013 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    British Mr. Burns: William Craig, I have no time for him, he's got a rather pompous voice.

  • @wrinkleneckbass
    @wrinkleneckbass 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I don't blame Dawkins for not wanting to debate him, WLC is so annoying and uses long-winded and ridiculous arguments to try to prove his points. Plus, WLC looks like an 80 year old David Lee Roth.

    • @lzzrdgrrl7379
      @lzzrdgrrl7379 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dawkins is giving me a mature Clint Eastwood vibe from my perspective....'>.....

  • @braddersfam1754
    @braddersfam1754 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This man said that no matter what evidence there was, he wouldn't change his mind. That's not scientific. What it is, it's suggestive of him not admitting to any moments of noticing a good point from, or any good debaters at all.

    • @JohnnyBeeDawg
      @JohnnyBeeDawg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s the very definition of a fool.

  • @jeffreytimmons9544
    @jeffreytimmons9544 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is probably the most likable and relatable Dawkins I’ve seen. Good stuff. I also very much appreciate Alex well representing the general Christian so well. No strawmaning here.

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Richard Dawkins molested me and i will not rest till i get justice

    • @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce
      @RichardDawkinsIsaNonce 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dawkins only has faith in evolution because he is a deeply closeted homosexual

  • @sammyking9407
    @sammyking9407 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Because Dr Craig would mop the floor with Dawkins .

    • @movie-mandan
      @movie-mandan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The only two people that Craig had a hard time with were Hitchens and Harris. Thirty years and as far as I know, only 2 people came close to beating him.

    • @sammyking9407
      @sammyking9407 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@movie-mandan The only reason Craig had a “hard” time with them is because of how dumb and ignorant both of them were regarding the topic of the debate. They had some talking points but were not prepared to engage Dr Craig at the level of a scholar.

    • @omnipop4936
      @omnipop4936 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He'd mop the floor, rinse it, buff it, wax it and buff it _again._

  • @1970Phoenix
    @1970Phoenix 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The very idea of someone "having to believe" something should raise red flags. No one can choose what convinces them.

    • @WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
      @WaterspoutsOfTheDeep 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Of course they can, you can be willingly ignorant based on worldview conviction. This is a pretty obvious thing... As Dawkins has said there is no evidence that would ever convince him of being a Theist. That is willful ignorance.

    • @1970Phoenix
      @1970Phoenix 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Being willingly ignorant (as almost all religious people are) is obviously very common. But that is unrelated to whether someone can choose to be convinced or some claim. It's easy to demonstrate that someone (including you) cannnot just choose to believe something. Could you choose to believe the moon was made of cheese? Of "no", then why not? What if you try really really hard to believe it. Then can you?
      I'd need to know the full context of Dawkin's comment, and what his EXACT words. In "The God Delusion", he said the opposite of what you assert, so I'm skeptical of your claim. Are you sure he didn't say that he doesn't believe there is any evidence that COULD convince him, because if so, then that is just him offering an honest opinion of the existance of sufficient evidence.
      I also don't believe there exists any evidence that COULD convince me, but if I am ever exposed to sufficient evidence to convince me, then (by definition) I will be convinced. While I got your attention, let me ask if you have any convincing evidence that one or more gods exist?

    • @bhavinmehta1490
      @bhavinmehta1490 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep Look into Doxastic voluntarism and involuntarism, direct Doxastic voluntarism fails while indirect works.

    • @mikehochburns8740
      @mikehochburns8740 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think the idea is that God is outside of morality. All good and bad things come from god.

    • @bhavinmehta1490
      @bhavinmehta1490 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mikehochburns8740 This makes God anything, I mean it’s problematic because we cannot start to define God in any sense because He is “outside” of well… everything and therefore makes this whole thing illogical and mythical. Btw I’m not an atheist I am a theist, but I’m merely pointing out an issue here. Also, if we suggest that both good and evil/bad of any sort is from God, than well He possesses these as qualities within him, as if he were a character, he designed the evil to occur in which case being called “good” falls short in meaning; it doesn’t live up the the notion of the “maximally greatest possible being,” given that if such a being exist He must be superior to the human rational mind not inferior.

  • @faithfullifepodcast5193
    @faithfullifepodcast5193 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dawkins' protestations ring hollow, yet again. Anyone watching this subject unfold over time is left with the distinct impression that Dawkins is desperate to avoid Craig in debate - a logical, if not laudatory, endeavor. Undoubtedly, Dawkins has watched the thorough drubbing Christopher Hitchens endured during his debate with Craig who, incidentally, is a very kind, calm respectful debater. Kudos to Alex for defending Craig's honor against the slander most unjustifiably heaped on him by Dawkins.

  • @gavinball6852
    @gavinball6852 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I find it incredibly interesting that Dawkins who claims there is no such thing as right and wrong, 'just blind pitiless indifference; and also claimed that it was morally acceptable to abort children simply because they would be down syndrome finds William Lane Craig evil and pompous. Alex on the other hand is a joy to listen to.