Creality RaptorX 3D Scanner vs Raptor: Scanning Speed Comparison on Car Bumper
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ธ.ค. 2024
- In today's video, we’re conducting a detailed comparison between the Creality Raptor 3D Scanner and the Creality RaptorX 3D Scanner, focusing on scanning speed in a real-world test. We’ll be scanning a car bumper measuring 1.80m x 0.5m x 0.5m to showcase the differences in performance.
Scanning Test Results:
-Creality Raptor: The Raptor completed the scan in 6 minutes and 58 seconds, delivering excellent detail for a wide range of scanning applications.
-Creality RaptorX: Powered by advanced 34-line cross-laser technology, the RaptorX finished the scan in just 3 minutes and 3 seconds-a remarkable performance improvement. For large objects like this car bumper, the RaptorX significantly enhances scanning speed and efficiency.
The RaptorX's superior speed makes it the ideal choice for professionals and users looking to save time without compromising quality. Whether you're working with large objects or need precise detail in less time, the RaptorX stands out as a top-tier 3D scanner.
Want to see more comparisons or specific tests with the Creality RaptorX or Raptor? Drop your suggestions in the comments below! Let us know what you'd like us to scan next, and don’t forget to subscribe for more in-depth reviews, tips, and tutorials on our Creality 3D Scanners.
#creality #3dscanning #3dscanner #crealityraptor #crealityraptorx #carbumper #speedcomparison #high-speed3Dscanning #3dmodeling
------------
Join our communities:
Facebook groups:
/ crealityraptorx
/ creality3dscanner
Follow us on social media:
Facebook: / creality3dscanner
Instagram: / creality3dscanner
Linkedin: / creality-3d-scanner
TikTok: / creality_3dscanner
Interesting that the RaptorX did not like to pick up the matte black features as well as the standard Raptor. I assume this is not so much of a hardware limitation as something that the software needs optimized for?
Overall this is a great demonstration and it shows where the RaptorX excels when it comes to scanning efficiency. Cutting down the time from 7 minutes to just over 3.
Can the scan files be showcased for viewers to see the detail difference between the two scanners? I'm sure it would be beneficial for people interested in purchasing to see what kind of detail they can expect from these scanners.
my guess is the exposure not allow to see the white and matte black at the same time, but I do want to know if RaptorX able to change the exposure during print so it can finish off the matte black features or this need another scan and merge later on
The RaptorX performs equally well when scanning matte black objects. In this case, the sunlight had an impact on the results, but adjusting the exposure settings can significantly improve the scan quality.
Regarding the scan files, we’ve noted your request and will share a detailed comparison in upcoming content. We appreciate your interest and support! Stay tuned!
@@fanstein9581 The RaptorX allows for real-time adjustment of exposure values during the scanning process.
Also might be worth noting that the Raptor X was using the crossed-lines mode as opposed to the 7 parallel-lines that the Raptor used which is designed to be used for large objects like the bumper being scanned. The Raptor X also has the ability to operate in the 7 parralel-lines mode as well, which is designed for greater detail of smaller objects. I would imagine the mesh file scanned by the Raptor would have more details than the Raptor X for this reason and also would be a larger file. I use a Raptor X and it does a pretty good job of scanning in relation to other scanners on the market within the same class (consumer/hobbyist); but if you do not plan on scanning larger objects and want to save a couple thousand dollars, the Raptor is more than adequate IMO. I would also take a look at the Otter if you do not want to deal with scanning markers.
I'm interested in plastic molding and reverse engineering of spare parts.
Can future videos focus on this?
Taking into account the dimensional considerations
We can see that there is a difference in time and quality of the mesh, is there a dimensional difference between the two models for pieces of this size?
There was no difference in the size of the models scanned by the two scanners.
@ For a piece of this size, is there much difference in precision in the final mesh?
I want to see Raptor VS MetroX, since both device are in the same price range and contain same 7 lines Laser mode , Please 🙏🙏🙏
Metro X is not ready for prime time, it has serious data aquisition problems, you have lot of beams but very weak intensity and point cloud capture takes forever. Raptor is way faster, would be interesting to see but Raptor would win
Maybe you´re 3min faster on such a big part, scanning is probably the smallest job here :) preparing the part, processing the data, reverse engeneering, do anything in cad with it.. come on 3min are nothing.. not even 3hours..
But imagine scanning whole car, I did scan of the whole car and yes scanning was the fastest part of it, it was up to 1hr for full exterior, with RaptorX maybe I can be in half time and I can have half an hour more for markers removal etc. Sometimes when you had car for limited amount of time its useful. But the main thing is RaptorX can handle bigger distance and scanning area, which means less markers also. I would love RaptorX without wifi option in the case for less money and it would be very interesting scanner for me (I have Raptor now and I love it)
Ok 3.5k but the program still a shit
Lol, I see scummy competitors are here. Noted ;)
half the time VS x3 the price...