Great video. I’ve just started experimenting with 3D scanning. Currently I have only used iPhone 11, no spray no other type of accessories. I can get good scans of simple objects, but I can’t achieve the same quality of things I really want to scan, which is an Air Source Heat Pump. It has a flat metal shiny surface most of the way round plus over complex textures and depths. Any chance you have a scanned something like this?
For your markers you could get some of that flexible magnet material used on fridge magnets, cut into little squares or use a leather hole punch to make them circular, then stick the markers to them. Gives resuable markers that are easy to remove and not too much post processing if the marker covers the magnet.
I recently bought my first scanner, a cr-scan ferret and I was a bit concerned because I had seen lots of people down on creality but for what I paid (250$ NIB) I'm incredibly impressed. I was able to scan a fender with no prep in 5-10 minutes easily, I've designed a mount for an oil cooler thanks to it, and other things. It's had issues on repeating surfaces like the BMW had here but overall very useful, you could definitely design something like a wide body kit using it. Creality really needs better project management and import/export for projects though because they are actually portable. I scan on my relatively low-end 2016 era laptop and then transfer the scans to a desktop for post processing. The trick is you have to find the project in the software's files which is anything but convenient.
Great video! Please do the inside of the engine bay in future videos. I am particularly interested in performance in the dark areas eg. the gap between the engine and the body where a turbo manifold would be. Thank you
Also when you're scanning.. if you click on the drop down in the top left scanning window, you can flip the scanning image to the left or right by 90º increments... since you like holding the scanner vertically, you should rotate the image to match
Cool to see some developments in the consumer scanner market, it’s been a while! Also great the otter seems to be a lot less resource intensive than the Einstar, which is one of its biggest flaws. 👍 looking forward to the raptor review!
For me it would be very interessting for body parts comparison. For example a repaired crashed chassis with a new one. So you can check if the repair was successfully or you need to tweak it a little bit more. Nice Video, keep it up!
Got an Otter my self. Using a laptop that uses a desktop CPU I9-10850k , 32gb ram, RTX 3080. Have no performance latency at all with the scanner. I am actually happy with it and decided to get one after watching your review. Hope Creality gives there software package a little bit more love but I actually dont mind it one bit. gets me enough data to work with and im happy with it. Aside from that Love the videos they are very informative and educational. Thanks a ton!
Really interesting video. The scanner looks capable and it's interesting the software is being actively developed. My problem would be more with Creality as a company. I purchased a CR Lizard, which turned it to be an absolute debacle. I think even if the einstar and otter were identical in performance, I wouldn't trust Creality to provide product support, especially at the 'prosumer' price point
@@deanclements1839 I did a few videos with it including this one. th-cam.com/video/Qmjd0ngQWeQ/w-d-xo.html I was impressed with its ability to scan the black anodized triple clamp that many other scanners struggled with. The big hangup for creality is the software. Its great for 1 click users but if you want more control over the points and mesh it falls a bit short.
Great video, it is amazing to me that there are now a couple of sub 1k scanners that are indeed viable tools that can actually be used to do actual work, not just some gimmick. I like your videos too, you are quite funny!
I’ve been eyeing off a scanner for a while but holding off as the benefits of models has been in a specific area. This Otter seems like a significant jump at the price point. Not sure my 2014 MacBook Pro could handle it? Loving the scanning content. Great reviews with just the right amount of tech detail. Well played sir.
It’s likely that it could handle the point cloud data if it’s a reasonably fast Quad Core from that era. RAM is typically the limiting factor as to whether you can work with capturing point clouds of varying sizes/densities. You can end up with millions of points in no time, so the physical size and detail of your object could be make or break. The post-processing doesn’t need to be able to be done in realtime, but if his new machine took 160 seconds for that little model, you may be waiting a dog’s age for it to process. You would need the extra cable to power it, as the laptop from that era wouldn’t have the chooch that you need. A simple USB power bank could be used if you needed portability. The biggest concern would be making sure that compatible software is available for your OS. With all of that said, a $600 PC-Based laptop of today would make light work of this thing, but if you’ll reply with your specs (processor, RAM, VRAM, size of your SSD or HDD), we can give you a better answer.
I would like to see you scan some objects with much finer detail to see what its limits are, perhaps try things with repeating patterns like lattices etc
I always wondered about this. Is there something special about the reflectivity of official markers or the scanner/software is specifically designed to pick up the size and shape of markers. I often wondered if just regular stickers would do the same job, and I havnt come across the info anywhere.
I got a higher end 3d scan camera system at auction for pennies and sold it for a decent profit. Didnt see what i could possibly use it for. I guess i should of looked up use cases. This came up in my feed weeks later.
I love your videos, and bought an Einstar using your review as a reference. I watch another TH-camr who does some good work and design etc. SuperfastMatt. Maybe not as many reviews, but has worked with 3D scanners, but he did mention using a combination of alcohol and baby powder in place of the sublimation spray (Obviously only on things that can be washed off afterwards). But may end up a bit cheaper than the spray for large areas. Really enjoyed the review. Thanks for the great vid!
@MakingforMotorsport make an accuracy test as well, to make it you need to have 100mm something, scan it then convert it to mesh and measure that it has also 100.0X mm to see what exactly Creality sell us.
How well do the scans pick up sharp edges, such as when two planes intersect, or when an irregular surface intersects a flat plane (e.g., the raised parts of a coin against the flat background)?
For the buttons on the back of the Otter, I felt like I was struggling a lot when pressing them. Customer support wasn\'t very helpful in resolving the issue, which was so disappointing that I had to return it.
You're the only one I trust in this void of sham sponsored nonsense on TH-cam mate.....you deserve so many more subs. (btw those X1C are just epic, loving mine !! :D )
Is it possible to scan a car part in the large mode and scan in detailmode a specific part and wrap them together in one project? so i get a large part with high acuracy in specific areas?
Got the Raptor yesterday. Had problems with my USB3.0 but had a second pci usb 3.0 card here and now it’s good. I would say it’s not the final and only scanner you need but i can scan a black Xbox controller without prepping it. You need to watch for the correct exposure to not get a lot of noise. It’s probably the best scanner for small to medium objects on the market. I’m looking forward for your review on the Raptor :) Edit: Still looking how to get best scan quality. A electric turntable is helping g a lot to make the scan smooth.
I have 3 Revopoint scanner along with the CR Ferret I purchased at launch. The only issue I have with the Ferret is that Creality’s false advertisement of that this career was a duel mode scanner that can scan small to large object. I’m not a metric system expert so the MM range is really only for medium to large items. The positives with my Ferret is it is much more forgiving than my Revopoint scanner when it comes to rescanning an area or when loss tracking is re established. It can also scan black objects, which again Revopoint scanners struggle unless you use dark mode. I was in the process of investing in the Miraco scanner for Revopoint until I saw this Otter scanner which is advertised as a do it all scanner. unlike its predecessor also this new Cr scan ferret upgraded software is much better, I will now probably add the Otter to. my collection of 3D scanners.
Awesome info in all of these videos! Do you think the Otter would be good choice for scanning various tools found in a workbench to make nice-fitting printed/foam molds for them?
It’s a good idea that I have seen before, but my take you need to be able to scan underneath them for the standoff to be an advantage. And for that that they’d need a hell of a stand off!
I owned A revo mini and sold it right away for an Einstar. The software is the biggest crippling factor for scanners. I want to like this scanner and try it out but I’ve heard plenty of bad reviews of past creality scanners
I’ve had both the Scan01 and the Lizard and I found them both better than many people said. But you’re 100% right, software is key and they’ve never quite nailed that…
nice review, have a peel 3, just pulled the trigger on the raptor for small stuff, arriving in a couple of days, fingers crossed it is as good as some vids i have seen, looking forward to your review :)
@@deanclements1839 if, and i do, have a choice, definitely use the peel for something like a car, not so much for scan quality, but rather for the software, peels is much more stable and better for something like a car, only my opinion :)
Just picked up an otter after watching your review! After a couple scans, I’m having a hard time getting a clean scan of a Porsche Cayman Front bumper. I’m using large scan, fast. Maybe I need high quality? I am looking rough measurements. I am finding that there are artifacts, missing information right in the middle of what looks to be complete scanned area. Do I need aesub? Markers? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated
I only ever used high quality so can’t comment on fast mode, but scanning something like a bumper, I’d try the following…. Use geometry tracking mode and place a scrumpled towel in front on the floor and on the bonnet to produce additional tracking info. Use texture mode with masking tape on the bumper to provide clear colour edges to track off But overall, I’d really advise you start smaller then go up from there, scanning (regardless what type of scanner) isn’t just holding the scanner, it is a skill and it takes development and practise… There will be movements I make to maximise tracking now without even thinking about it.
Hmm, did I watch this before I wonder... I grabbed one of these during Black Friday, still trying to get my head around it - difficult so far (without watching this vid / enough vids) Among many things I wish the scan software had something to re-orient to UCS (I don't really want the hassle of installing Zeiss) I wonder if you know of a very cheap source of magnetic marker dots? I'd like the ability to reuse them ((Have a big fear of consuming consumables which I'm trying to work on)) It took me >5 tries to calibrate the thing - I still have no idea what the yellow lights mean I don't recall turntable toggle or RGB 'light' in my software
It looks really promissing and it addresses couple of the Einstar's issues - scanning of small stuff and not needing a power brick. Looking forward to see the Raptor.
Which scanner would you buy if you're scanning car interiors and making parts to form-fit into corners of the dash and other places of the car, such as speaker pods, etc?
I’ve been using Mesh Inspector lately and am enjoying it. It’s fast and has loads of tools. It can even align and merge scans. I have the Raptor and it’s incredible. I’m interested in your take and if I should add an Otter to the collection even though I have the Raptor.
The Otter has the better NIR. Means: everything that prevents you from using the blue laser mode will be worse on the raptor. But to be honest I doubt it will be enough to buy another scanner.
You should try the Shaper origin stickers on the texture alignment in the new Einscan EXSTAR Software. It’s amazing. I will never use refective dots again.
I am looking for a way of scanning a radar arch for a boat to give me dimensions to work off of for fabricating an Aluminum Hard Top that would attach to the arch. Would this tool be able to provide me with X Y and Z dimensions from different points?
When you said “Collective domain” my ears pricked. Is that where on extra large scan, you can take an overall lower res scan of the markers only. Then when you do your multi segmented scan, it is used as a reference and automatically adds/aligns the scans?
Hi Steve, it was “connected domain”. That’s a tool for mesh and point clouds that it highlights all the connected parts. So if you had a scan which had lots of erroneous floating data but a good model in the middle, you highlight a bit of the model, and the connected domain function highlights the rest of the scan that is connected to the highlighted bit, leaving all the floating sections unhighlighted. Use the invert function and bingo all the floating bits are highlighted and can be deleted. Makes scan clean up happen in about 5secs
@@MakingforMotorsport Thanks heaps for the informative reply. I did a search for “Connected domain” and found a tutorial for the “Shining 3d” software. Do you know if the Creality software has a similar function? I dearly hope that Creality develops their software tool a heck of a lot further. Good Lord it’s laughably basic! Looking forward to your Raptor video. 🇦🇺🤜🏼🤛🏼🍀😎
how much of a improvement did they make with the software and is it compatible with the older models, I find that to be one of the bigger draw backs was the software packaged for the 01 and the lizard?
The same software is used for the Otter, Raptor and Ferret… I don’t know if it’s Lizard and Scan01 compatible but I would guess not. The new software package is very simple and user friendly compared to the Lizard one, but it’s just lacking on tools…
@@MakingforMotorsport love your videos, when do you think this comparison will be out? Trying to decide on a scanner for scanning suspension pivot points and making upgraded spindles, upper control arms
I need to create parts. start to finish is this least friction. The only reason I am considering this is because of the requirement for Einstar needing Nvidia GPU. I have Radeon so the Einstar is out for me and I now have to consider the Otter.
Just got a raptor at work and wow! Absolutely smashed it out the park. Makes my old revopoint pop2 look like a 15 year old smartphone!! The otter does look impressive also and think creality have done a very good job on these new generation scanners.
Good review but like almost anyone on YT review it's not enough showing towards software nor how it is for retro-engineering a part (eg. Scan to CAD/SW or Fusion360 or similar). The hardware is becoming very good nowadays but software makes alot of difference . IMO, most people want to use a 3D scanner for CAD and retro-engineering something.
The Reverse Engineering is a total different subject and completely seperate from the type of scanner you use to get the .stl (you could use Photogrammetry for example). Check out my Reverse Engineering video with Fusion360 for a detailed how to on that… th-cam.com/video/imGrla3b3Mo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=TK6icb538FVHys3I
@@MakingforMotorsport Not really. The software used with the scanner can make alot of difference to ensure a good transition from surfaces scanned and being more "ready" in the CAD software
I'm looking to scan an ITB setup to make an airbox. Do you think Otter would be better than the Einscan for this? I'm planning on taking off the airhorns so I can scan the tops of the ITB's and the linkage for the design of the lower airbox. I have no experience with 3D scanning.
Great video, thank you, subscribed! I am only just now peeking in to the 3D scanner world. I am a long time CAD user, primarily with Solidworks. I want to scan a ginormous cargo van inside and out for the purpose of building an accurate, detailed, and robust parametric model using the scanned data. I will then use that to design bolt-in modular interiors and other accessories, mostly utilitarian and moto oriented (a toilet in the car is NOT my thing..). 3D scanners appear to be absolutely amazing and reasonably affordable to the hobbyist these days. If you have any words of wisdom or guidance to offer a complete newb I would be very grateful! Cheers!
If you are thinking of buying an Otter then check out the Description for a discount code, and please consider using my affiliate links!
The links are currently broken. I get a "This site can’t be reached. The connection was reset." error.
@macrobionic oh shit! Thanks for saying… let me check
I had a check and the links all work for me
Is there a link for the printable 3d targets
Great video. I’ve just started experimenting with 3D scanning. Currently I have only used iPhone 11, no spray no other type of accessories. I can get good scans of simple objects, but I can’t achieve the same quality of things I really want to scan, which is an Air Source Heat Pump. It has a flat metal shiny surface most of the way round plus over complex textures and depths. Any chance you have a scanned something like this?
"Let's see if this Otter can make a splash". Bro, it was right there.
That’s pretty good… better than lots of OTTER comments! (It’s all I got!)
Beavers splash more than otters
Otterly careless.
For your markers you could get some of that flexible magnet material used on fridge magnets, cut into little squares or use a leather hole punch to make them circular, then stick the markers to them. Gives resuable markers that are easy to remove and not too much post processing if the marker covers the magnet.
I get you, Big Dave from DC3D has done the same as you… I also know how long he spent doing it them 😂
I am really curios to see if a full car body scan is possible. Can you try in the next video. Thanks for all the awesome videos.
I was about to ask this but saw your comment. Yes, please show us stitching together scans to do a full car please!
Another great video. Keep them coming!
Rick! You absolutely diamond! I’ve a got a Raptor video coming soon 👍
@@MakingforMotorsport So have you played enough with the Raptor now? We are waiting :D
@mk1classic just uploading now my man! Out tomorrow once the Patrons have seen it.
@@MakingforMotorsport Nice - I hope this is the way to go. Too many upcoming car projects that need 3D scanning :D
I recently bought my first scanner, a cr-scan ferret and I was a bit concerned because I had seen lots of people down on creality but for what I paid (250$ NIB) I'm incredibly impressed. I was able to scan a fender with no prep in 5-10 minutes easily, I've designed a mount for an oil cooler thanks to it, and other things. It's had issues on repeating surfaces like the BMW had here but overall very useful, you could definitely design something like a wide body kit using it. Creality really needs better project management and import/export for projects though because they are actually portable. I scan on my relatively low-end 2016 era laptop and then transfer the scans to a desktop for post processing. The trick is you have to find the project in the software's files which is anything but convenient.
How do you stitch different passes together?
excitedly waiting for the raptor review. Between the Otter, Einstar, and Raptor for farm/motorsport work (home/hobby)
Thanks for the great video!
No problem buddy, it’s all coming soon I promise!
Great video! Please do the inside of the engine bay in future videos. I am particularly interested in performance in the dark areas eg. the gap between the engine and the body where a turbo manifold would be. Thank you
Also when you're scanning.. if you click on the drop down in the top left scanning window, you can flip the scanning image to the left or right by 90º increments... since you like holding the scanner vertically, you should rotate the image to match
Cool to see some developments in the consumer scanner market, it’s been a while! Also great the otter seems to be a lot less resource intensive than the Einstar, which is one of its biggest flaws. 👍 looking forward to the raptor review!
The price difference and the need for a powerful laptop is what made me go for the Revopoint Range instead of the Einstar
How did the range go for you? What type of stuff are you scanning? Range or range 2?@@FutureProofPerformance
For me it would be very interessting for body parts comparison. For example a repaired crashed chassis with a new one. So you can check if the repair was successfully or you need to tweak it a little bit more.
Nice Video, keep it up!
Great vid, very useful little tool. Also, your editing has improved a lot since the start - will follow with excitement!
Your mention of the Raptor sent me off researching and after an entire day, I bought one. Love your videos, though they affect my willpower..
Got an Otter my self. Using a laptop that uses a desktop CPU I9-10850k , 32gb ram, RTX 3080. Have no performance latency at all with the scanner. I am actually happy with it and decided to get one after watching your review. Hope Creality gives there software package a little bit more love but I actually dont mind it one bit. gets me enough data to work with and im happy with it. Aside from that Love the videos they are very informative and educational. Thanks a ton!
Rich Kid 💸💸🤑
Really interesting video. The scanner looks capable and it's interesting the software is being actively developed. My problem would be more with Creality as a company. I purchased a CR Lizard, which turned it to be an absolute debacle.
I think even if the einstar and otter were identical in performance, I wouldn't trust Creality to provide product support, especially at the 'prosumer' price point
Great review look forward to the Raptor vid! Do a large statue and engine parts!
Almost time for me to grab one, great review keep it up
Giving you an owl with a product called the otter is such a creality move
woah dude that large scan at 21:15 is worth the price of admission
Wow thats a pretty impressive scanner, cant wait for the next vid
Nice Video! I just got my Otter yesterday and was hoping it held up to the hype.
It’s a good little piece of kit… enjoy!
How did it work for you? Would you recommend?
@@deanclements1839 I did a few videos with it including this one. th-cam.com/video/Qmjd0ngQWeQ/w-d-xo.html I was impressed with its ability to scan the black anodized triple clamp that many other scanners struggled with. The big hangup for creality is the software. Its great for 1 click users but if you want more control over the points and mesh it falls a bit short.
Great video, it is amazing to me that there are now a couple of sub 1k scanners that are indeed viable tools that can actually be used to do actual work, not just some gimmick. I like your videos too, you are quite funny!
Thank you very much, working on the next video now! 👍
i ordered one for work to save on modeling time. cant wait to try it out.
How did it work for you?
I’ve been eyeing off a scanner for a while but holding off as the benefits of models has been in a specific area. This Otter seems like a significant jump at the price point. Not sure my 2014 MacBook Pro could handle it? Loving the scanning content. Great reviews with just the right amount of tech detail. Well played sir.
It’s likely that it could handle the point cloud data if it’s a reasonably fast Quad Core from that era. RAM is typically the limiting factor as to whether you can work with capturing point clouds of varying sizes/densities. You can end up with millions of points in no time, so the physical size and detail of your object could be make or break.
The post-processing doesn’t need to be able to be done in realtime, but if his new machine took 160 seconds for that little model, you may be waiting a dog’s age for it to process.
You would need the extra cable to power it, as the laptop from that era wouldn’t have the chooch that you need. A simple USB power bank could be used if you needed portability.
The biggest concern would be making sure that compatible software is available for your OS.
With all of that said, a $600 PC-Based laptop of today would make light work of this thing, but if you’ll reply with your specs (processor, RAM, VRAM, size of your SSD or HDD), we can give you a better answer.
@@grumpysteelman thanks mate. I maxed out RAM at the time of purchase so it’s a not too shabby 16GB.
Einstar or Otter?
I'm amazed... I have been under the impression that anything that Creality makes was pretty much garbage! You have changed my mind.
Creality does not make them. They are made by another company that makes the moose
Scan that bass guitar I noticed while scanning the room.
Keep the rock alive Garth!
Wow, that really looks fantastic! Thanks, great review 👍🏻
Thanks for watching!
Love the T-Shirt!
Let's goo! 🔥
Underrated channel
I would like to see you scan some objects with much finer detail to see what its limits are, perhaps try things with repeating patterns like lattices etc
I use uhu patafix stickers for car panels/dashboard instead of markers. It's white, shapeable and reusable. Then i can scan in feature mode easily.
Thanks, I’ll have to check them out!
I always wondered about this. Is there something special about the reflectivity of official markers or the scanner/software is specifically designed to pick up the size and shape of markers. I often wondered if just regular stickers would do the same job, and I havnt come across the info anywhere.
I got a higher end 3d scan camera system at auction for pennies and sold it for a decent profit. Didnt see what i could possibly use it for. I guess i should of looked up use cases. This came up in my feed weeks later.
Very Interesting. Looking forward to the Raptor review.
Love the mini btw, my dream car since i first saw the original italian job
I love your videos, and bought an Einstar using your review as a reference. I watch another TH-camr who does some good work and design etc. SuperfastMatt. Maybe not as many reviews, but has worked with 3D scanners, but he did mention using a combination of alcohol and baby powder in place of the sublimation spray (Obviously only on things that can be washed off afterwards). But may end up a bit cheaper than the spray for large areas. Really enjoyed the review. Thanks for the great vid!
So many otter puns. Brilliant!
20:00 I was waiting for this. I just sold my einstar and want an upgrade. I haven't don't much research in budget scanners for a while
I somehow missed your last two uploads! Gonna fix that. I am looking at 3D scanners though, so time to absorb this first.
Thanks for the video! Will be waiting for the Raptor for a review!!!!
Should be out next week… finished up the last scan for the video (15 in total!!!) last night
@MakingforMotorsport make an accuracy test as well, to make it you need to have 100mm something, scan it then convert it to mesh and measure that it has also 100.0X mm to see what exactly Creality sell us.
Please show some postprocessing to remove the marker thingys❤
How well do the scans pick up sharp edges, such as when two planes intersect, or when an irregular surface intersects a flat plane (e.g., the raised parts of a coin against the flat background)?
21:09 I don’t know if you know it, but the Einstar got a software update. It has a rewind button now as well.
Hi there, yeah, I’m up to date with the Einstar, I didn’t mention it here as this isn’t a full comparison video…
That’s coming soon….
Is it me or did creality spell their own name wrong in their documentation at minute marker 17:35?
Another great video! I'm checking out prices now...
Amazing video! Thanks a lot. Waiting for Raptor :)
For the buttons on the back of the Otter, I felt like I was struggling a lot when pressing them. Customer support wasn\'t very helpful in resolving the issue, which was so disappointing that I had to return it.
You're the only one I trust in this void of sham sponsored nonsense on TH-cam mate.....you deserve so many more subs. (btw those X1C are just epic, loving mine !! :D )
Great review, very detailed. Thank you
Glad it was helpful!
How about test otter and Einstar to scan large object? I used Einstar and Miraco in exhibition, Einstar scan large object faster than Miraco.
If I want to scan body panels, full cars and some black or reflective objects, which one do you recommend? Einstar or Raptor
Is it possible to scan a car part in the large mode and scan in detailmode a specific part and wrap them together in one project? so i get a large part with high acuracy in specific areas?
Got the Raptor yesterday. Had problems with my USB3.0 but had a second pci usb 3.0 card here and now it’s good.
I would say it’s not the final and only scanner you need but i can scan a black Xbox controller without prepping it. You need to watch for the correct exposure to not get a lot of noise.
It’s probably the best scanner for small to medium objects on the market.
I’m looking forward for your review on the Raptor :)
Edit: Still looking how to get best scan quality. A electric turntable is helping g a lot to make the scan smooth.
The Raptor is a decent piece of kit… not perfect, but very good
Compared to the Einstar you have been reviewing, would you say einstar is better to go or the otter?
I have 3 Revopoint scanner along with
the CR Ferret I purchased at launch.
The only issue I have with the Ferret
is that Creality’s false advertisement
of that this career was a duel mode
scanner that can scan small to large
object. I’m not a metric system expert
so the MM range is really only
for medium to large items.
The positives with my Ferret is it
is much more forgiving than my
Revopoint scanner when it comes to
rescanning an area or when loss
tracking is re established. It can
also scan black objects, which
again Revopoint scanners struggle
unless you use dark mode.
I was in the process of investing in
the Miraco scanner for Revopoint until
I saw this Otter scanner which is
advertised as a do it all scanner.
unlike its predecessor also this new
Cr scan ferret upgraded software is
much better, I will now probably add
the Otter to. my collection of 3D scanners.
Awesome info in all of these videos! Do you think the Otter would be good choice for scanning various tools found in a workbench to make nice-fitting printed/foam molds for them?
Nice one, still feels a bit behind the Einstar (reading between the lines) but great for larger objects than pop3.
You could probably reduce the post-processing on your 3D printed marker is if they were on a stand off pole.
It’s a good idea that I have seen before, but my take you need to be able to scan underneath them for the standoff to be an advantage. And for that that they’d need a hell of a stand off!
@@MakingforMotorsport I was thinking like an inch? Have the magnet on the base, then in post processing on the angle you’d cut most of it away easily.
I’ll be using this to scan motorcycle engines.
Much appreciated.
I think it’ll do that job fine…
I owned A revo mini and sold it right away for an Einstar. The software is the biggest crippling factor for scanners. I want to like this scanner and try it out but I’ve heard plenty of bad reviews of past creality scanners
I’ve had both the Scan01 and the Lizard and I found them both better than many people said. But you’re 100% right, software is key and they’ve never quite nailed that…
Dont u like Einstar software ? Why will u chose creality over Einstar
Did you try any scans of transparent/translucent objects with the Creality Otter?
nice review, have a peel 3, just pulled the trigger on the raptor for small stuff, arriving in a couple of days, fingers crossed it is as good as some vids i have seen, looking forward to your review :)
How would the raptor compare to the peel for larger car body panel type scans, would it work in your opinion?
@@deanclements1839 if, and i do, have a choice, definitely use the peel for something like a car, not so much for scan quality, but rather for the software, peels is much more stable and better for something like a car, only my opinion :)
Is there a wrap film with printed dots so that you can scan faster and more accurately ?
Just picked up an otter after watching your review! After a couple scans, I’m having a hard time getting a clean scan of a Porsche Cayman Front bumper. I’m using large scan, fast. Maybe I need high quality? I am looking rough measurements. I am finding that there are artifacts, missing information right in the middle of what looks to be complete scanned area. Do I need aesub? Markers? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated
I only ever used high quality so can’t comment on fast mode, but scanning something like a bumper, I’d try the following….
Use geometry tracking mode and place a scrumpled towel in front on the floor and on the bonnet to produce additional tracking info.
Use texture mode with masking tape on the bumper to provide clear colour edges to track off
But overall, I’d really advise you start smaller then go up from there, scanning (regardless what type of scanner) isn’t just holding the scanner, it is a skill and it takes development and practise…
There will be movements I make to maximise tracking now without even thinking about it.
Thank you so much for your reply! That makes sense and gives me another starting point. Thanks!
Hmm, did I watch this before I wonder...
I grabbed one of these during Black Friday, still trying to get my head around it - difficult so far (without watching this vid / enough vids)
Among many things I wish the scan software had something to re-orient to UCS (I don't really want the hassle of installing Zeiss)
I wonder if you know of a very cheap source of magnetic marker dots? I'd like the ability to reuse them ((Have a big fear of consuming consumables which I'm trying to work on))
It took me >5 tries to calibrate the thing - I still have no idea what the yellow lights mean
I don't recall turntable toggle or RGB 'light' in my software
Excellent! I currently have a raptor and am wondering if I should downgrade to the otter and what I'd be missing if I did. Thank you!
Don't. I have a friend who has compared both and the raptor comes out on top.
It looks really promissing and it addresses couple of the Einstar's issues - scanning of small stuff and not needing a power brick. Looking forward to see the Raptor.
Exactly… a couple of distinct advantages…
What laptop are you using? Is it a good laptop to run autocad/3d Cad ?
Which scanner would you buy if you're scanning car interiors and making parts to form-fit into corners of the dash and other places of the car, such as speaker pods, etc?
Really looking forward to raptor. Very tempted to swap my einstar for one
I’m interested in scanning a foot, and its all measurements bottom included. Can it do that?
That is the first time I’ve ever been asked that question. If it can scan a face I reckon it can do a foot!
How is the foot plant scanned? Lifting the foot or by standing on the rotating plate with the sensors below the foot?
vs. Einstar? your opinion please
20:42
I’ve been using Mesh Inspector lately and am enjoying it. It’s fast and has loads of tools. It can even align and merge scans.
I have the Raptor and it’s incredible. I’m interested in your take and if I should add an Otter to the collection even though I have the Raptor.
The Otter has the better NIR. Means: everything that prevents you from using the blue laser mode will be worse on the raptor. But to be honest I doubt it will be enough to buy another scanner.
Can we export the point cloud to process in other tools like Metashape or Reality Capture?
Always good content
You should try the Shaper origin stickers on the texture alignment in the new Einscan EXSTAR Software. It’s amazing. I will never use refective dots again.
I’m yet to try the software upgrade yet for Exstar…. Heard mixed things. Good that texture mode has had a bump in use ability tho….
Those Jokes were otterly terrible! L0Lz. Great video 👍💯
Very nice! 🤩good job!
I never knew that there was a unwind mode after a scan went bad
I am looking for a way of scanning a radar arch for a boat to give me dimensions to work off of for fabricating an Aluminum Hard Top that would attach to the arch. Would this tool be able to provide me with X Y and Z dimensions from different points?
Which do you think works best for car parts, the otter or the einstar ?
Finally a decent review video
Cheers bud
When you said “Collective domain” my ears pricked.
Is that where on extra large scan, you can take an overall lower res scan of the markers only. Then when you do your multi segmented scan, it is used as a reference and automatically adds/aligns the scans?
Hi Steve, it was “connected domain”. That’s a tool for mesh and point clouds that it highlights all the connected parts.
So if you had a scan which had lots of erroneous floating data but a good model in the middle, you highlight a bit of the model, and the connected domain function highlights the rest of the scan that is connected to the highlighted bit, leaving all the floating sections unhighlighted. Use the invert function and bingo all the floating bits are highlighted and can be deleted.
Makes scan clean up happen in about 5secs
@@MakingforMotorsport
Thanks heaps for the informative reply. I did a search for “Connected domain” and found a tutorial for the “Shining 3d” software.
Do you know if the Creality software has a similar function?
I dearly hope that Creality develops their software tool a heck of a lot further. Good Lord it’s laughably basic!
Looking forward to your Raptor video.
🇦🇺🤜🏼🤛🏼🍀😎
Do you considercit better than the Revopoint Mini 2 - which has added bluelight tracking ?
I haven’t tried the Mini2, so I can’t honestly say.
Bugger, ive only just bought a pop3 I knew I should have looked at this one a bit more 😢
Thanks very much.
hi! Great review but the "includes paid promotion" is really confusing tbh!
how much of a improvement did they make with the software and is it compatible with the older models, I find that to be one of the bigger draw backs was the software packaged for the 01 and the lizard?
The same software is used for the Otter, Raptor and Ferret… I don’t know if it’s Lizard and Scan01 compatible but I would guess not.
The new software package is very simple and user friendly compared to the Lizard one, but it’s just lacking on tools…
Can you create a video comparing the Otter and the Einscan?
I will be doing a comparison on the Einstar, Otter, Raptor, POP3 and whatever else gets sent to me…
@@MakingforMotorsport love your videos, when do you think this comparison will be out? Trying to decide on a scanner for scanning suspension pivot points and making upgraded spindles, upper control arms
Einstar Vega for sure. Good price also
It would be interesting to see what comes out 9n top for general automotive/motorsport work, the otter/raptor or einstar!
I need to create parts. start to finish is this least friction. The only reason I am considering this is because of the requirement for Einstar needing Nvidia GPU. I have Radeon so the Einstar is out for me and I now have to consider the Otter.
Just got a raptor at work and wow! Absolutely smashed it out the park. Makes my old revopoint pop2 look like a 15 year old smartphone!! The otter does look impressive also and think creality have done a very good job on these new generation scanners.
I LOVED IT NICE INFO ABOUT SCANNER.....
Good review but like almost anyone on YT review it's not enough showing towards software nor how it is for retro-engineering a part (eg. Scan to CAD/SW or Fusion360 or similar). The hardware is becoming very good nowadays but software makes alot of difference .
IMO, most people want to use a 3D scanner for CAD and retro-engineering something.
The Reverse Engineering is a total different subject and completely seperate from the type of scanner you use to get the .stl (you could use Photogrammetry for example).
Check out my Reverse Engineering video with Fusion360 for a detailed how to on that…
th-cam.com/video/imGrla3b3Mo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=TK6icb538FVHys3I
@@MakingforMotorsport Not really. The software used with the scanner can make alot of difference to ensure a good transition from surfaces scanned and being more "ready" in the CAD software
Is sowtwear included in price
I'm looking to scan an ITB setup to make an airbox. Do you think Otter would be better than the Einscan for this? I'm planning on taking off the airhorns so I can scan the tops of the ITB's and the linkage for the design of the lower airbox. I have no experience with 3D scanning.
Either scanner would do this well…. I’m doing something very similar to this at the moment and that’ll be the next video after the Raptor….
Can any of these scans be converted for printing on a BambuLab X1C?
I'd love a direct comparison between the otter, raptor, and Einstar, at the moment I'm debating between the three
Me too! 😂
Great video, thank you, subscribed! I am only just now peeking in to the 3D scanner world. I am a long time CAD user, primarily with Solidworks. I want to scan a ginormous cargo van inside and out for the purpose of building an accurate, detailed, and robust parametric model using the scanned data. I will then use that to design bolt-in modular interiors and other accessories, mostly utilitarian and moto oriented (a toilet in the car is NOT my thing..). 3D scanners appear to be absolutely amazing and reasonably affordable to the hobbyist these days. If you have any words of wisdom or guidance to offer a complete newb I would be very grateful! Cheers!
Sweet Video! How can you compare the scan with CAD? Basically, to compare the manufactured part with nominal (CAD). Cheers!