It´s funny that these news channels never mention three things when talking about "Nukes in Finland" and "Russia had to put troops to the Finnish border": 1) Russia already has the majority of it´s nuclear 1st and 2nd strike capability quite close to Finland. If Finland would have a couple of nukes, then the balance is still tipped quite much towards Russia. 2) Currently Finnish law (Nuclear Energy Act 990/1987) forbids any nuclear weapons on Finnish soil. There are no implications that this will be changed in the near future. 3) Russia has always had (well since the Empire at least) a strong military presence on the Finnish border. In fact, when the full invasion of Ukraine started, Russia pulled up to 80% of the men and equipment from the bases next to Finland and shipped them to Ukraine. And many of those are not ever coming back. Also Russia has not made any moves to get the troops leves even back to pre-war levels, let alone increase it. So please, do not fearmonger on topics where there is no fear to monger. Russian ambassador is just echoing narratives that are many years old.
Russia places nukes on Belarus its neighbour whereas America places nukes to a country bordering Russia their main enemy??? The last time something like this happened was the Cuban missile crisis and u know how America reacted to that rightfully so
Russians warn of iminente end of society. Americans no warning against Japan. Warning much better! Be sure it will not reach 1000! No one can fool reality!
If russia disagree of nuke in finland, why russia deployed its nuke in belarus? Is nato russia's tail?... I love peace not war...Russia must learn from his mistake. If he has not invaded ukraine, then finland and sweden were not forced to join nato... If love, respect, and peace are found in russia's heart and mind, then not war, and anger we see in europe, but PEACE.
@@Rape.White.Expats What right did russia have to attack Ukraine, an independent country ? If russians are afraid of Nato/Ukrainians, then they can build tiger teeth within their own borders, not on Ukrainian soil. Russian leaders just needs enemies and conflicts to stay in power, that is why they say that Ukraine/NATO is threatening Russia. If Ukraine/NATO is a threat to Russia then why there are no Russian soldiers (except basic guarding) on the Russian NATO borders ? Based on intelligence information, the resistance was supposed to be minimal and the people on the Russian side, Putin was told what he wants to hear. Russia invaded Ukraine because it thought it could be conquered easily, but he failed.
It's funny because the Russian city of Kaliningrad, which is right in the heart of Europe, has more nuclear weapons and missiles pointed towards Europe! But when NATO places missiles there, it's considered threatening! What a double standard we have here! Russian hypocrisy, and if you don't understand it, you're being intellectually dishonest.
@@yelenashishkina8804 Finland owns nothing to russia. During the history, russia has kept attacking Europe multiple times. That is also how they took Finland from Sweden in the first place
@@yelenashishkina8804 Finland owes it's statehood to the fact that it fought Russia to a standstill in 1939. Ukraine is now in the process of doing the same and like Finland will some day become a NATO member.
Due to weak leadership in Finland. Their mistake was joining NATO. The maintaining of the neutral relationship with Russia was the best course of action for Finland.
Easy to shout when you don't have a crazy neighboring country. Finland has learned from history, the eastern neighbor is aggressive again but no longer alone.
So just an FYI... Finland gas rate went from .23 to 2.30 per kwh. The energy crisis will continue to wreck all European Countries and that 2% GDP into military arms sold from US will cut their social spending. A total fail move to head in this direction after all this time neutral. Instead of putting away the old blood debts and integrating Russia into Europe in the 1990s we went full steam ahead isolating threatening and making a laughing stock of Russia in general. Now Europe is de-industrialized. Europe is in freefall. Ukraine is decimated. The US is printing printing printing more money for bombs and weapons. Meanwhile China and Russia grow ever closer and have the upper hand in manufacturing in resources in all things practical. I am not sure what madness was stirred in the minds of Western leaders but we have lost our credibility thrown international stability in the garbage and we have no diplomats or statesmen in the West left to talk peace.
Russian complaint - NATO expansion right up to Russian borders , Russia complains US depliyment of American nuclear weapons to Finland , Russia complains etc My nuclear stockpile target For Nato -15000 hbombs -Quad -15000 hbombs . Wiii Russia complain !
But the US is mindful of those warnings as Russia has many options in Europe for their nukes. Conversely, the US has only ONE, Russia, which would be the endgame for both, and maybe the Rest. It's just Cuba with the tables turned!
If you think about what Russia could build with all the money they earned.. Russia is sick, or the leadership is sick.. And its sad to look at the Russian people true this lens..
@@jayakrishnan26 I know he is and so does most of the rest of the world. Maybe you should sit and watch his mutual destruction speech over and over again until you finally get it 🤣
Ukraine was neutral, what happened to them ? Finland and Sweden joined NATO only because Russia is aggressive. Non-alignment is no longer an option, Russia sees neutrality as weakness. Putin said "Russia's border does not end anywhere" a few years ago and now he is making it happen.
Why do you believe these disinformation fairy tales ? Nobody is putting nuclear weapons anywhere. There are already Nato countries like Norway, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland near Russia like Finland is, none of these have Nukes.
No, we do not need any more "bold moves" by Russia. Putin is not only terrorizing Ukraine with his bold moves but is hurting Russia as well for many years to come.
Russia has a strategy and it does not involve making a first strike. They tell Finland they are watching them closely since US/NATO moved nuclear weapons and a ‘volunteers’ into the country. Russia is in no hurry. They have energy, food and weapons, while NATO is running out of all of these.
@@thembelasogayisa443 what knowledge that Belarus has nukes from Russia. Well even a kid will know the borders from Belarus and Russia. Besides your comment don't change the fact that Belarus has nukes from Russia and NATO never treated Belarus over it. What Russia thought that there was not going to be a response? Just like he invaded Ukraine cause he was scared about them joining NATO now NATO has 2 new members thanks for Putin mistake
Why should we do that? Nato is a giant success which successfully has secured its member states ever since it was established. But sure the ruzzkies would like Nato to fail, so they can get free access to further conquering souvereign states, like they do with Ukraine.
The answer lies in a question would you mind sacrificing your own son/mom/brother for someone in a different country who is not even your neighbour. This same question UK/France must answer before they even say what you propose.
Finnish law does not allow nuclear weapons its soil, everyone knows this. The USA is not placing nuclear weapons in any new NATO country. There are already Nato countries like Norway, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland near Russia like Finland is, none of these have Nukes. Submarines have been invented.
There is only one question ... Will the West (NATO) risk worldwide nuclear armageddon if Russia erases tiny Finland from the map because it intentionally, and unnecessarily, became a threat? My guess, no.
And how do you avoid a nuclear war with a nation that continues to be the only actor saying that other countries wanting independence is a provocation.
Finland does not threaten anyone, Finland is a peaceful country unlike Russia but better be prepared when there is a crazy neighbor in the east. Russia has invaded Ukraine and threatened Finland and Sweden with military action. Threatened Invading Baltic countries, Poland, Moldova,Istanbul, Alaska and East side of Germany. Nuking several towns and locations: London, Washington, Yellowstone and Hague. Putin has stated "Russia's border does not end anywhere" which some Russian units are using their motto
Finland is imitating little Napoleon Macron, acting like some sort of power to impress its new NATO masters. Zelenskyy must be giving NATO leaders clown lessons.
Finland has not said anything. 1) Finnish law does not allow nuclear weapons its soil. Everyone in NATO knows this. 2) The USA is not placing nuclear weapons in any new NATO country. There are already Nato countries like Norway, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland near Russia like Finland is, none of these have Nukes. 3) Submarines have been invented.
@@londop.a.3048 The Finnish PM has been running his mouth but regardless, at this point is doesn't matter. UA has collapsed. Remains to be seen whether NATO wants to throw soldiers and more money into the meat grinder or not. The US won't with elections in Nov and UA support finished amongst G7 citizens.
After Finland joined NATO, Russia has no longer dared to violate Finland's airspace. Finland and Sweden joined NATO only because Russia is aggressive. Non-alignment is no longer an option, Russia sees neutrality as weakness. Putin said "Russia's border does not end anywhere" a few years ago and now he is making it happen.
In reality Finland joining NATO has nothing to do with the USA. Russia invaded Ukraine and Finland estimated its neighbors had become more aggressive and unpredictable than before, so Finland could use a defensive alliance to make a Russian invasion less likely. Another issue was that Russia threatened Finland and said it will retaliate If Finland joins NATO. Not joining would have looked like we take orders from Russia, which cannot be.
It´s funny that these news channels never mention three things when talking about "Nukes in Finland" and "Russia had to put troops to the Finnish border":
1) Russia already has the majority of it´s nuclear 1st and 2nd strike capability quite close to Finland. If Finland would have a couple of nukes, then the balance is still tipped quite much towards Russia.
2) Currently Finnish law (Nuclear Energy Act 990/1987) forbids any nuclear weapons on Finnish soil. There are no implications that this will be changed in the near future.
3) Russia has always had (well since the Empire at least) a strong military presence on the Finnish border. In fact, when the full invasion of Ukraine started, Russia pulled up to 80% of the men and equipment from the bases next to Finland and shipped them to Ukraine. And many of those are not ever coming back. Also Russia has not made any moves to get the troops leves even back to pre-war levels, let alone increase it.
So please, do not fearmonger on topics where there is no fear to monger. Russian ambassador is just echoing narratives that are many years old.
is FINLAND still the happiest country in the world?
Still is
We don't give a damn, we keep smiling.
Outside smiles but inside cry 😅
@@christianoronaldo2189 Russia is a toothless kitten, it meows loudly but is powerless.
@@jimc9596😂😂😂
Whats the problem? Russia moved some nukes in Belarus. So again, whats the problem?
@ronjones8696 So what?
Right lol
Russia places nukes on Belarus its neighbour whereas America places nukes to a country bordering Russia their main enemy??? The last time something like this happened was the Cuban missile crisis and u know how America reacted to that rightfully so
@@wildfire613 this is about Finland/Poland in Europe.
@@wildfire613 Yes, I played Metal Gear Solid 3 so I know exactly what you mean.
Nowadays Boeing produces scare-planes, instead of air-planes.
I am going to go with Russian Prop channel or Modi boot licker channel. Because, at this point, no one takes Russia seriously.
How will Finland overcome this definitely last warning? :D
nobody but Russia is talking about nuclear weapons.
Russia got every week some last warning - don't worry.
They aren't the best neighbour.
Actually Finland joining NATO is a bigger risk than Ukraine.. St Petersburg is just stone throw distance from Finland border
You should look at the map. St.Petersburg is closer to the Estonian than the Finnish border, therefore NATO did not get any closer to St.Petersburg.
@@sampohonkala4195 - I verified and checked again.. It is closer to Finland border .. you need to check again ..
Petersbufg is in Finnish lands actually
What number warning from Putin is this. We cant be very far away from 1000 warnings.......and the world is still standing
1000 is the magic number
Putler don’t want no smoke. That’s why he’s the only one throwing the nuclear weapons card. And folks actually follow him blindly 😂
Russian way: exhaustively warning
American way: no warning!
Hug your kids and your wife more often 😢 maybe just maybe
Russians warn of iminente end of society.
Americans no warning against Japan.
Warning much better!
Be sure it will not reach 1000!
No one can fool reality!
If russia disagree of nuke in finland, why russia deployed its nuke in belarus? Is nato russia's tail?... I love peace not war...Russia must learn from his mistake. If he has not invaded ukraine, then finland and sweden were not forced to join nato... If love, respect, and peace are found in russia's heart and mind, then not war, and anger we see in europe, but PEACE.
Russia has every right to defend themselves
Are you one of 🙈🙉🙊And for you life started in 2022?
@@Rape.White.Expats What right did russia have to attack Ukraine, an independent country ? If russians are afraid of Nato/Ukrainians, then they can build tiger teeth within their own borders, not on Ukrainian soil. Russian leaders just needs enemies and conflicts to stay in power, that is why they say that Ukraine/NATO is threatening Russia. If Ukraine/NATO is a threat to Russia then why there are no Russian soldiers (except basic guarding) on the Russian NATO borders ?
Based on intelligence information, the resistance was supposed to be minimal and the people on the Russian side, Putin was told what he wants to hear. Russia invaded Ukraine because it thought it could be conquered easily, but he failed.
Wake up! People! Etc....governments officials.
Nah this depressing im going to sleep ignorance is bliss .
Gosh another 'big warning' from orclandia
Somewhere there in Mordor.. Frodo is out there to throw the ring back into the Kremlin..
It's funny because the Russian city of Kaliningrad, which is right in the heart of Europe, has more nuclear weapons and missiles pointed towards Europe! But when NATO places missiles there, it's considered threatening! What a double standard we have here! Russian hypocrisy, and if you don't understand it, you're being intellectually dishonest.
How many times Russia attacked Europe and how many times European powers tried to destroy Russia? Donэt forget Finland owes its statehood to Russia. 😂
Never heard of the Cuban Missile Crisis? Educate yourself on US hypocrisy.
@@yelenashishkina8804 Finland owns nothing to russia. During the history, russia has kept attacking Europe multiple times. That is also how they took Finland from Sweden in the first place
@@yelenashishkina8804 Finland owes it's statehood to the fact that it fought Russia to a standstill in 1939. Ukraine is now in the process of doing the same and like Finland will some day become a NATO member.
@@atlantic169 Grand Duchy of Finland 1809 Educate yourself. No need to thank me 🙂
I just found this channel. I'm enjoying it. Hello from the USA.
Hai, I am from India. Who seems win the Presidential election this year in your country?
@@tbraghavendran impossible to know this early
Due to weak leadership in Finland. Their mistake was joining NATO. The maintaining of the neutral relationship with Russia was the best course of action for Finland.
Easy to shout when you don't have a crazy neighboring country. Finland has learned from history, the eastern neighbor is aggressive again but no longer alone.
If they expect common sense why did they start a war in the first place
"Doors are overrated"-Boeing 2024
Peace
So just an FYI... Finland gas rate went from .23 to 2.30 per kwh. The energy crisis will continue to wreck all European Countries and that 2% GDP into military arms sold from US will cut their social spending. A total fail move to head in this direction after all this time neutral. Instead of putting away the old blood debts and integrating Russia into Europe in the 1990s we went full steam ahead isolating threatening and making a laughing stock of Russia in general.
Now Europe is de-industrialized. Europe is in freefall. Ukraine is decimated. The US is printing printing printing more money for bombs and weapons. Meanwhile China and Russia grow ever closer and have the upper hand in manufacturing in resources in all things practical. I am not sure what madness was stirred in the minds of Western leaders but we have lost our credibility thrown international stability in the garbage and we have no diplomats or statesmen in the West left to talk peace.
Boeing needs an emergency rehabilitation.
We been waiting for 100 years to tell Russia where they can shove it 😂
Europe won't back down to bluffs
Europe day after day becomes less relevant in global geopolitics. 😂
They're almost bankrupt and have no armies plus massive internal protests but ok.
Europe is full of bluffs
Europe full of hypocrisy
Her Inglish is very good for her audience in India.
Yes,Molly with humble tone rhythm of voice than others in wion, sorry,my dogma.
Russian complaint -
NATO expansion right up to Russian borders , Russia complains
US depliyment of American nuclear weapons to Finland , Russia complains etc
My nuclear stockpile target
For Nato -15000 hbombs
-Quad -15000 hbombs .
Wiii Russia complain !
Leaders of authocratic nation have become greedy.
Fact.
Flying is still the safest form of travel by far.
No, the elevator is.
Another warning?
what is a engine cover? it's a cover that covers the engine! you cant make this chit up
Hello to WION & to Mrs Molly , nice female journalist 👏
But the US is mindful of those warnings as Russia has many options in Europe for their nukes. Conversely, the US has only ONE, Russia, which would be the endgame for both, and maybe the Rest. It's just Cuba with the tables turned!
If you think about what Russia could build with all the money they earned..
Russia is sick, or the leadership is sick..
And its sad to look at the Russian people true this lens..
Putin is a 🤡. How do people not decipher what these threats really mean?🤣
Really ? You think Putin is a clown ?
They mean buisness, try Putin and you will pay the price
@@jayakrishnan26 I know he is and so does most of the rest of the world. Maybe you should sit and watch his mutual destruction speech over and over again until you finally get it 🤣
@@musadube1647 🤡
Yess 100%.pooptin a bald 🤡🤡🤡
Boing ceo straight to jail for god sake
need a peace
Peace comes after
Remember USSR why did it brake up
Help this plane company with the money you are wasting on foreign wars.
Unfortunately I think Finland made a mistake and not remain neutral 😢😢
That's what Russia wants.
If that is a mistake, why russia is not neutral? or belarus?
Ukraine was neutral, what happened to them ? Finland and Sweden joined NATO only because Russia is aggressive. Non-alignment is no longer an option, Russia sees neutrality as weakness. Putin said "Russia's border does not end anywhere" a few years ago and now he is making it happen.
NATO MEMBERS DOES NOT HAVE THOSE COMMON SENSE ONLY ENVY AND HUBRIS...😂😂😂😂😂
Why do you believe these disinformation fairy tales ? Nobody is putting nuclear weapons anywhere. There are already Nato countries like Norway, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland near Russia like Finland is, none of these have Nukes.
It's high time Russia should make a bold move. Because it might be too late.
No, we do not need any more "bold moves" by Russia. Putin is not only terrorizing Ukraine with his bold moves but is hurting Russia as well for many years to come.
Russia has a strategy and it does not involve making a first strike. They tell Finland they are watching them closely since US/NATO moved nuclear weapons and a ‘volunteers’ into the country. Russia is in no hurry. They have energy, food and weapons, while NATO is running out of all of these.
who is worried about putin , only russian men , everyone else just laughs
Belarus has nukes from Russia did NATO treat Russia lol
U need to know the borders first then come and comment. Don't comment without knowledge please
@@thembelasogayisa443 what knowledge that Belarus has nukes from Russia. Well even a kid will know the borders from Belarus and Russia. Besides your comment don't change the fact that Belarus has nukes from Russia and NATO never treated Belarus over it. What Russia thought that there was not going to be a response? Just like he invaded Ukraine cause he was scared about them joining NATO now NATO has 2 new members thanks for Putin mistake
Russia war strategy is extremly slow.... 😮
Close Down NATO now .
Why should we do that? Nato is a giant success which successfully has secured its member states ever since it was established. But sure the ruzzkies would like Nato to fail, so they can get free access to further conquering souvereign states, like they do with Ukraine.
Finland is sold and payed.
Pootin will be pootin
Russia talk too much
Russia? hohoho
Girl i like your voice ,but your out look is wackout.😅
Please don't bull ,hit about south Africa the thieves just want more money
KA BOOM!!!!!😂
why Europe not warn Russia about their nuclear weapons too?
The answer lies in a question would you mind sacrificing your own son/mom/brother for someone in a different country who is not even your neighbour.
This same question UK/France must answer before they even say what you propose.
Full of threat lack of action, Pooptin. You failed. 😂
Remember the Cuban missile cirsis?
Finnish law does not allow nuclear weapons its soil, everyone knows this. The USA is not placing nuclear weapons in any new NATO country. There are already Nato countries like Norway, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland near Russia like Finland is, none of these have Nukes. Submarines have been invented.
Do you trust Putin?
There is only one question ... Will the West (NATO) risk worldwide nuclear armageddon if Russia erases tiny Finland from the map because it intentionally, and unnecessarily, became a threat? My guess, no.
And how do you avoid a nuclear war with a nation that continues to be the only actor saying that other countries wanting independence is a provocation.
@@vilandar I don't know. How about keeping your word that you wouldn't keep encroaching on THEIR border with YOUR nuclear weapons for a start?
Finland does not threaten anyone, Finland is a peaceful country unlike Russia but better be prepared when there is a crazy neighbor in the east. Russia has invaded Ukraine and threatened Finland and Sweden with military action. Threatened Invading Baltic countries, Poland, Moldova,Istanbul, Alaska and East side of Germany. Nuking several towns and locations: London, Washington, Yellowstone and Hague. Putin has stated "Russia's border does not end anywhere" which some Russian units are using their motto
Putin ❤️
😂😂😂 why should fi dland listen to rusdia
Blah…Blah….Blah….👎
Made in USA...LOL
RUSSIA did not invade Ukraine
good: ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,ha...
Take Putin seriously Nuclear weapons is not a joke 🇿🇦
Finland is imitating little Napoleon Macron, acting like some sort of power to impress its new NATO masters. Zelenskyy must be giving NATO leaders clown lessons.
The only clown is in the Kremlin. Don't worry though, NATO will wipe the smirk off his face if he gets uppity.
Finland has not said anything.
1) Finnish law does not allow nuclear weapons its soil. Everyone in NATO knows this. 2) The USA is not placing nuclear weapons in any new NATO country. There are already Nato countries like Norway, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland near Russia like Finland is, none of these have Nukes. 3) Submarines have been invented.
@@londop.a.3048 The Finnish PM has been running his mouth but regardless, at this point is doesn't matter. UA has collapsed. Remains to be seen whether NATO wants to throw soldiers and more money into the meat grinder or not. The US won't with elections in Nov and UA support finished amongst G7 citizens.
ISREAL should join NATO
What idiots
Smell THE DAY AFTER
When Putin pouts he looks like Dr Evil from them movies.
It's a big mistake for Finland to join nato,
Do you work for putin
It was big mistake for putin to attack Ukraine
After Finland joined NATO, Russia has no longer dared to violate Finland's airspace.
Finland and Sweden joined NATO only because Russia is aggressive. Non-alignment is no longer an option, Russia sees neutrality as weakness. Putin said "Russia's border does not end anywhere" a few years ago and now he is making it happen.
@@pafry6432yes we all work for him, if that makes you happy
It’s big mistake that ur mother gave u a birth
Thanks to American thirst for global geopolitical dominance Finland is heading toward preemptive demolition!
In reality Finland joining NATO has nothing to do with the USA. Russia invaded Ukraine and Finland estimated its neighbors had become more aggressive and unpredictable than before, so Finland could use a defensive alliance to make a Russian invasion less likely.
Another issue was that Russia threatened Finland and said it will retaliate If Finland joins NATO. Not joining would have looked like we take orders from Russia, which cannot be.
@@sampohonkala4195 Too naive for this discussion.
@@fingerprint8479 Sorry to hear you are too naive, but you don't have to advertise it here.
@@sampohonkala4195 No one can fool reality!
Immigrants worker's 😢😂😅🎉