I have the R6 and appreciate your review on both cameras. I'm considering the R7 as a second body and seeing this review really helps me to decide to get an R7. Thanks!
I would love to see a video using the Canon EF to RF speed booster on the R7 using some wide angle primes and zooms. I know the adapter is meant for the C70, but I imagine it will be useable on the R7.
I’ve got both R6 and R7 and I’m sorry to say - I find your videos really biased. You don’t grade footage to match. I find your R6 color really dull - look at the red shirt… I’m sure one can do better. Both are great cameras, but for me R6 is really the beast.
The R6 was a top choice for me until I found out how it switches from photo to video, because I do a lot of hybrid work I think the R7 would work faster for me.
I do appreciate the feedback. I don't disagree with you. To be more fair to color I feel I should have picked a color profile and not log. As a novice color grader I would say the R7 does grade easier for me. Using the same grade in clog3 unfortunately doesn't get the same results. Although the test is more around focal length and bokeh I will do my best to match color for future comparison video. Thanks for the feedback.
@@JaredHoyman BTW. I believe the clog3 was a good choice, but you should probably use some type of conversion lut to match both images to REC.709. I recommend Todd Dominey conversion luts as a starter. Look at the video "How to expose Canon Log on the EOS R5 and R6" for more informations.
The R7 would give you more reach for bird photography. If you don't need the full frame look then the r7 offers more features including unlimited video recording with no overheating.
If it was primary video then the R7 hands down. No overheating, excellent 7k oversampling down to 4k, xlr option and amazing autofocus. Not to mention photos look great!
An off market speedbooster completely throws the contest away. I'd rather the focal length be different due to crop then entering a third party device into the test. Like for like body with native glass.
That's a good question. The R7 is better and more reliable for video than the R6, so if you are more video focused I would go to the R7. If you are more photo focused and do a little video and do not need long recording times, then the R6 is great. Full frame sensors give a great look, but you would be hard pressed to spot the difference with a crop sensor like the R7. They both have their pros and cons and that is why I will keep both of them. I use the R6 on all my real estate photo shoots and I use the R7 mostly for my youtube vids and business vids. I hope that answer helped a little ;)
Sir! I saw your viral video titled (Canon R7 Vs R6 | Part 1 | The autofocus was a little shocking) which has 11K views. I liked this video a lot, after that I watched a lot of your videos and I think your video is addictive.
Currently own both the EOS R and the R6. I've been wanting to replace the R without going crazy with money. Although the R7 is a crop-sensor, could you see it as an R replacement?
Hi, I am unsure, what to buy. The R6, with the 'older' AF and the missing crop for Wildlife, or the newer R7, but not as good at low light, especially for milky way? I own the Tokina 11-20 and Tamron 16-300 on my 600D right now. Any tipps for me? I am struggling hard😂
If you are shooting mostly outdoors and wildlife the reach you get with the R7 Crop is excellent. If low light is a factor then the r6. Both are excellent. Full Frame does produce beautiful images. I own both 😉
I'm having to really scrutinize the images and video and really very closely inspect this. Now I'm thinking if it's this close, and if often times the r7 is actually better, then maybe I will do the r7! It's just all my life I've only ever had a PSE and smaller, and it's always been a dream of mine to someday have a full frame camera. Dang it, and now and now they release the r7!
I see the value in both and that's why I shoot mainly on the r6 and do most video with r7. If you could only have one then it would be a tough decision.
@@Paul_Dalangpan LOL...me too...with 3 kids. For me I can justify for business. I don't think you will be disappointed with either one. R7 may give you more options with video and even photo because of the Viltrox speedbooster and 3rd party EF lenses. I would be more tempted in doing that if I only had one option.
Is it just me or did the R6 seem way more Bright? I'm assuming you didn't use an ND filter? I have the m50 and have been wanting to upgrade. I was thinking about full frame but would love to not have to buy such expensive lenses. Great video by the way!
HI! Thanks so much for this video. I know you cant really decide for me. I do mostly families and portraits and lots of them in low light at the beach. Should I get the R7 or R6? Is the MP count really a huge factor? I am kinda of Leaning toward the R7 but the R6 I know Several of the other photographers in my Home town have it
You can't go wrong with either. If low light and portraits are what you are doing I would lean more towards the R6 then. It is great in low light and the 20mp have not disappointed me in photos. I would decide soon thought because the rumor is that canon is going to raise prices in Sept. Not to rush you ;)
@@felipecastro8668 i always expect surprises. maybe the difference is tiny to negligible, ive seen that in the photo comparisons and even in some comparisons they said the higher resolution makes the r7 a better choice than the r6 even in low light. sony is known for slapping noise reduction on their video. im interested in canon vs canon, same brand likely same algorithm.
@@RichieColemanSr both are very similar in button layout. If you are primary photo then I would lean towards the R6 for full frame. If you are going to do a lot of video then the R7. Do note the r6 mark 2 will be announced soon and the R6 will go down in price.
Super Test und vielen Dank für die Mühe👌Wie heist der Song in dem Video?? (4:53) . Ich habs... Butterfield / Marc Torch -Thema (Dank google suche ;) Gute Auswahl👍Grüße und weiter so.
@@JaredHoyman Let’s hope they put it in a firmware update as this camera is amazing for the price - it’s not arrived in the UK stores yet and there is a demand for it here from what I can see online
@@SuchetB They are just now starting to become available on Amazon in the US. I got pretty blessed at got the last one at my local camera store. Today's vid was shot on the R7. Look for it in about 20min.
Yes, that was a tough day to test 2 cams at the same tripod position. Although those videos were both shot within 15min of each other the clouds and sun kept playing Tag. Future testing has been simultaneously done as of late with my future comparisons.
My thoughts too. I use my R6 on all my photoshoots and even property walk throughs in 60fps since it's not a long shoot. Everything else I use the R7 including with my TH-cam content. R7 video is reliable.
Yippee Ki-Yay!!! I've been told Vin Diesel (minus the muscle) in a past comment, I talk like Christian Slater from another viewer and now Bruce Willis. Keep them coming! I have to fit some kind of mold on this channel so people remember me.
Be mindful the R6 has a 20mp full frame sensor which is more sensitive to light than the R7 has more lense compression and its def delivering a clean image but the truth is with apsc vs full frame test shouldn't be made with the same settings due to sensitivity on sensors. the performances are different within the rolling shutter and ISO sensitivity... im def considering the R7 as second camera.. I actually love cropped sensor camera..
@@vzbeatz1706 ISO is being abused these days... Sensors are sensors and the size coupled with aperture works with light. That is how cameras work after all? A full frame sensor's size is arbitrary at best, based on the size of 35mm film.
@@lbeetech Iso is being abused, fullframe with only 20mp delivers cleaner image in low light allowing consumers with the option not to abuse iso, But at the same time the point or revolutionizing mirrorless systems is to have that extra security to abuse it if you have to. The R7 holds out good in low light for an cropped sensor.
Surprised myself... actually love the R7 better. Thank you so much!
Wow. I much prefer the color science and rendering on the R7. Thanks 😊
I have the R6 and appreciate your review on both cameras. I'm considering the R7 as a second body and seeing this review really helps me to decide to get an R7. Thanks!
Canon R7's autofocus was hunting a lot due to the speed booster that's how I always figured out which is which
Yes! Did you notice the final test without the speedbooster locked in faster with autofocus?
@@JaredHoyman let me have a look at that
@@JaredHoyman yeah R7's autofocus did shine without the speed booster
I think the R7 seems more appealing to me now - This was an amazing test - Thank you
I would love to see a video using the Canon EF to RF speed booster on the R7 using some wide angle primes and zooms. I know the adapter is meant for the C70, but I imagine it will be useable on the R7.
Thank you. Yes, better video features than the r6. Very similar to the r6 ii though.
awesome vid man. Do you have a video for R10? Would love to see comparison as well for those on tight budget like me. Thanks!
I don’t but that might be an idea.
I’ve got both R6 and R7 and I’m sorry to say - I find your videos really biased. You don’t grade footage to match. I find your R6 color really dull - look at the red shirt… I’m sure one can do better. Both are great cameras, but for me R6 is really the beast.
The R6 was a top choice for me until I found out how it switches from photo to video, because I do a lot of hybrid work I think the R7 would work faster for me.
I do appreciate the feedback. I don't disagree with you. To be more fair to color I feel I should have picked a color profile and not log. As a novice color grader I would say the R7 does grade easier for me. Using the same grade in clog3 unfortunately doesn't get the same results. Although the test is more around focal length and bokeh I will do my best to match color for future comparison video. Thanks for the feedback.
@@JaredHoyman Keep up the good work!
@@JaredHoyman BTW. I believe the clog3 was a good choice, but you should probably use some type of conversion lut to match both images to REC.709. I recommend Todd Dominey conversion luts as a starter. Look at the video "How to expose Canon Log on the EOS R5 and R6" for more informations.
@@dziaba0303 I subscribe to his channel so I'll check it out. Thanks!
So, which one will be better for bird photography, bif, shooting in the woods, some landscapes and some portraits, which one will be more versatile?
The R7 would give you more reach for bird photography. If you don't need the full frame look then the r7 offers more features including unlimited video recording with no overheating.
If you were primarily using a camera for youtube work (talking head videos), would you choose the R7 or R6?
If it was primary video then the R7 hands down. No overheating, excellent 7k oversampling down to 4k, xlr option and amazing autofocus. Not to mention photos look great!
I liked the footage with the speed booster the best, which I was shocked about.
Same! It doesn't track as perfectly as the canon ef to rf but image is amazing!
An off market speedbooster completely throws the contest away.
I'd rather the focal length be different due to crop then entering a third party device into the test.
Like for like body with native glass.
Watch my first vs test video on autofocus. I did it with native lenses. That's a great video to watch when it comes to native RF glass.
@@JaredHoyman oh awesome I definitely will
the R6 VIDEO will always be the one with sunshine on the big tree in the background.. lol
Yup. I'm doing another test on 60fps and filming both at the same time.
Excellent comparison of its own kind. Very good work! R7 appears to be better!
in your opinion which has been better since you have used it more. Is the r7 or r6 better for video and which is better for photography?
That's a good question. The R7 is better and more reliable for video than the R6, so if you are more video focused I would go to the R7. If you are more photo focused and do a little video and do not need long recording times, then the R6 is great. Full frame sensors give a great look, but you would be hard pressed to spot the difference with a crop sensor like the R7. They both have their pros and cons and that is why I will keep both of them. I use the R6 on all my real estate photo shoots and I use the R7 mostly for my youtube vids and business vids. I hope that answer helped a little ;)
More megapixels do show up. Solves a bit of the "softness" of the R6.
Sir! I saw your viral video titled (Canon R7 Vs R6 | Part 1 | The autofocus was a little shocking) which has 11K views. I liked this video a lot, after that I watched a lot of your videos and I think your video is addictive.
I think you will like today's video that will be released in the next 40min.
R7 amazing 👍👍✌️✌️
R7
Currently own both the EOS R and the R6. I've been wanting to replace the R without going crazy with money. Although the R7 is a crop-sensor, could you see it as an R replacement?
Yes I can. I had the EOSR too and I replaced it with the r7. Great video features and gets more reach when you want it.
great thanks
Hi,
I am unsure, what to buy. The R6, with the 'older' AF and the missing crop for Wildlife, or the newer R7, but not as good at low light, especially for milky way? I own the Tokina 11-20 and Tamron 16-300 on my 600D right now. Any tipps for me? I am struggling hard😂
If you are shooting mostly outdoors and wildlife the reach you get with the R7 Crop is excellent. If low light is a factor then the r6. Both are excellent. Full Frame does produce beautiful images. I own both 😉
@@JaredHoyman thx! I just realized, that my owned lenses are only APS-C. So i think it will be the R7. Does R7 a quite good job with milky way pics?
@marcusgypta653 get fast lenses that are 1.8 or faster. You can always do speedboosters with full frame lenses and brings in more light.
Thank you for this! Looking into the Rf system coming from Pansonic.
I had the GH5 and loved it, but the R7 and R6 mark II are amazing.
I'm having to really scrutinize the images and video and really very closely inspect this. Now I'm thinking if it's this close, and if often times the r7 is actually better, then maybe I will do the r7! It's just all my life I've only ever had a PSE and smaller, and it's always been a dream of mine to someday have a full frame camera. Dang it, and now and now they release the r7!
I see the value in both and that's why I shoot mainly on the r6 and do most video with r7. If you could only have one then it would be a tough decision.
@@JaredHoyman I'm married with kids brother. I'm lucky to be able to pick one.
@@Paul_Dalangpan LOL...me too...with 3 kids. For me I can justify for business. I don't think you will be disappointed with either one. R7 may give you more options with video and even photo because of the Viltrox speedbooster and 3rd party EF lenses. I would be more tempted in doing that if I only had one option.
Sorry i’m French, i don’t unterstand. For photography, Canon R6 is the best ? Or R7 is the best ?
R6 Best for photo. R7 best for video.
@@JaredHoyman merci :)
THe r7 seems to retain more highlights.
Thank you for this video I love that lens and have it on my r7 now.
I find this lens to be a hidden gem. I'm hoping the only reason tamron discontinued it so fast is the they will release a 35-150 2-2.8
Shoot a ball game. Test subject tracking.
Is it just me or did the R6 seem way more Bright? I'm assuming you didn't use an ND filter? I have the m50 and have been wanting to upgrade. I was thinking about full frame but would love to not have to buy such expensive lenses. Great video by the way!
They both had the same ND filter, but unfortunately during the test the sun would come and go and that is why the R6 looks blown out at times.
HI! Thanks so much for this video. I know you cant really decide for me. I do mostly families and portraits and lots of them in low light at the beach. Should I get the R7 or R6? Is the MP count really a huge factor? I am kinda of Leaning toward the R7 but the R6 I know Several of the other photographers in my Home town have it
You can't go wrong with either. If low light and portraits are what you are doing I would lean more towards the R6 then. It is great in low light and the 20mp have not disappointed me in photos. I would decide soon thought because the rumor is that canon is going to raise prices in Sept. Not to rush you ;)
@@JaredHoyman r6 mk2 ;)
keep it up! low light comparison? outdoor low light, i want to see which has more video noise.
You don't need to test for this. The answer is very obvious. Canon R6 beats R7. And the Sony A7IV beats the Canon R6.
@@felipecastro8668 i always expect surprises. maybe the difference is tiny to negligible, ive seen that in the photo comparisons and even in some comparisons they said the higher resolution makes the r7 a better choice than the r6 even in low light.
sony is known for slapping noise reduction on their video. im interested in canon vs canon, same brand likely same algorithm.
What's your thoughts on the R7. I have the Canon 90D and want to make it my 2nd body, and I'm looking for a main body (Mirrorless)
I love it and will be keeping it for the foreseeable future. Can't recommend it enough.
@@JaredHoyman What about the R6 vs the R7, as I'm use to the 90D button layout?
@@RichieColemanSr both are very similar in button layout. If you are primary photo then I would lean towards the R6 for full frame. If you are going to do a lot of video then the R7. Do note the r6 mark 2 will be announced soon and the R6 will go down in price.
@@JaredHoyman I do photography I don't really do videos. Thanks
Canon R7 is have nice color
Super Test und vielen Dank für die Mühe👌Wie heist der Song in dem Video?? (4:53) . Ich habs... Butterfield / Marc Torch -Thema (Dank google suche ;) Gute Auswahl👍Grüße und weiter so.
Is there a setting in it where we can adjust the shutter angle rather than shutter speed?
Unfortunately, not as of right now. There is a rumor a R7C will be released that will have cinema features like shutter angle.
@@JaredHoyman Let’s hope they put it in a firmware update as this camera is amazing for the price - it’s not arrived in the UK stores yet and there is a demand for it here from what I can see online
@@SuchetB They are just now starting to become available on Amazon in the US. I got pretty blessed at got the last one at my local camera store. Today's vid was shot on the R7. Look for it in about 20min.
We might be splitting hairs but for the money I’ll take the R7
$1k difference is big. Especially when you can buy awesome glass for it.
sadly the lighting was completely different (cloudy vs very sunny), so you can't really compare the footage :(
Yes, that was a tough day to test 2 cams at the same tripod position. Although those videos were both shot within 15min of each other the clouds and sun kept playing Tag. Future testing has been simultaneously done as of late with my future comparisons.
For photos, Canon R6 is better in my opinion. If you are a video guy, R7 is a better choice.
My thoughts too. I use my R6 on all my photoshoots and even property walk throughs in 60fps since it's not a long shoot. Everything else I use the R7 including with my TH-cam content. R7 video is reliable.
thxxxx
interesting explaination! thanks bruce willis ;)
Yippee Ki-Yay!!! I've been told Vin Diesel (minus the muscle) in a past comment, I talk like Christian Slater from another viewer and now Bruce Willis. Keep them coming! I have to fit some kind of mold on this channel so people remember me.
@@JaredHoyman perhaps you can be featuring with bruce Willis :D
Awesome 👏🏻
Do a low light battle and see why the R6 is more expensive.
And that my friend is why I'll keep the R6. I use that exclusively for real estate walk throughs and architectural photography.
I liked the dynamic range look on the r7 better. The r6 looked blown out most of the time...
Unfortunately the sun kept going in an out so the exposure was hard to control. The R7 oversampling 4k help the image by a lot in my opinion.
Be mindful the R6 has a 20mp full frame sensor which is more sensitive to light than the R7 has more lense compression and its def delivering a clean image but the truth is with apsc vs full frame test shouldn't be made with the same settings due to sensitivity on sensors. the performances are different within the rolling shutter and ISO sensitivity... im def considering the R7 as second camera.. I actually love cropped sensor camera..
@@vzbeatz1706 ISO is being abused these days... Sensors are sensors and the size coupled with aperture works with light. That is how cameras work after all? A full frame sensor's size is arbitrary at best, based on the size of 35mm film.
@@lbeetech Iso is being abused, fullframe with only 20mp delivers cleaner image in low light allowing consumers with the option not to abuse iso, But at the same time the point or revolutionizing mirrorless systems is to have that extra security to abuse it if you have to. The R7 holds out good in low light for an cropped sensor.