Sony a7SIII - In Camera Sharpening vs Sharpening in Post
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- In this video, I compare -7 detail default in Sony a7SIII SLOG3 vs various in camera sharpening levels as well as compare vs sharpening in post.
Gear I use
Sony a7SIII: amzn.to/3cp4cEi
LED STICK LIGHT: amzn.to/3l59ZCd
AUDIO RECORDER: amzn.to/2EMm93f
POCKET LED LIGHTS: amzn.to/3kYw05y
Sigma 85mm DG DN: amzn.to/33hS6Ke
Sigma 24-70 DG DN: amzn.to/2SbAWYz
Came TV Boltzen Light - amzn.to/2GvOETX
Black Pro Mist 1/8 - amzn.to/3dQ5Qzs
Black Pro Mist 1/4 - amzn.to/31CLOnb
amzn.to/2PdKe5D
amzn.to/2LXV9hR
amzn.to/2qFgXqS
Music and a couple of stock footage clips I used are from below:
My music subscription and stock footage recommendation - 2-months FREE! Artlist bit.ly/artlist-vu
Artgrid bit.ly/artgrid-vu
Let me know what your thoughts are with In camera vs post sharpening 🤙
great review, after reviewing so many comparisons, i assumed if one was concerned with sharpness and they were still interested in purchasing a camera that didn't have the best sharpness, that one might be able to just fix it "post production"...
...and your video helped me conclude that would be an accurate assumption...thank u very much! 💯✨️
✌️☯️
Very nice mate! I didn’t know people complained about the in-body sharpness, I think it looks fine on my phone screen which is now becoming the main medium of watching contents tbh
Tru
Vu, first of all, thanks for all your work, suggestions and humour 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
But can I ask you a question: what workflow can u suggest to douchebags that don’t have yet money to buy a7sIII and willing to maxout their a7c's with slog3???
Sorry for my poorness and lack of money but I'm from Ukraine and we having some major problems now... So, buying new the camera is difficult wright now... 😉😊
I didn’t start dropping the sharpening in Camera until I picked up this Sony a6600. I do prefer to have it smoother out of Camera, as I can see in your -7 detail. As for the GoPro though, I’m not a fan of Low sharpening, I try to keep it on medium
🤙🤙
I just tested this and I see no difference let alone a benefit for sharpening in post rather than in camera, people just make up BS.
I can't get out of my head whether my mind is playing tricks on me, when I'm filmed a leather jacket which is meant to be smooth with detail, it seems to feel a bit too sharp. I've not changed anything on the camera. Out of the box, do you think they've added extra sharpness? Or is it because eyes see differently in real life to a flat screen where the camera has filmed every inch of the jacket in full detail?
Vu, man! Thank you for the great content every time! Please don't be so harsh on yourself, I understand those were jokes about yourself but I somehow felt sorry for you 🧡
😂
Thanks for the video. I really thought it was mostly hocus pocus and seems to be generally correct. Less things to do in post for me is always the better bet. I think 0 looks perfectly fine. But I also like things being sharp so I can see some people wanting to pull it back a little. Needless to say I don't think it leaves any distortions and to my eyes doesn't look overly processed. So Imma just leave it at 0.
I couldn't tell the difference but it is November in the UK, its lockdown and I'm up to 4 glasses of red 😁 keep the good work up Vu
😂😂
Best comment goes to^
Pretty subtle man. At the end it all comes out to 1 major thing
How much time do you want to spend in post "grading" your image to deliver it on Facebook/TH-cam/Instagram
I just don't see the point anymore.
Anyways, keep up the nice vids!
I agree in some ways. Just gotta put it out
Great video. Also love the intro. Thanks
🙏
Dang some detail test. IDK my eyes are messed up from playing Final Fantasy VII. LOL
😂
I would say detail at 0 is not good as your cap starts to flicker when you turn your head. -4 is ok but the sharpening in post from -7 gives the most flexibility ... so best way to go in my experience.
Generally agree
Vu great stuff as always. I thought the 0 detail setting in the Sony body looked the best. I wonder what the results would have looked like in low light; I think the 0 detail may add more noise? I know you know this, just added for the comment readers.
🤙🤙
Looking at the footage, the in body sharpening looks fine to me too. I also played a lot of street fighter though.
😂😂😂
Can't really tell the difference with in-body sharpening and post sharpening. Guess my eyes got blurred from looking at Tifa in her mature dress in FFVII remake. BTW, what program do you use for post production. Keep up the great work Vu!
Premiere pro
Thanks for doing this test. However one thing to keep in mind is that adding sharpening in post will always be heavier on the cpu when combined with luts etc
It depends on the cpu. My computer doesn't skip a beat
My setting is -0.4 and i have never done this test before, after watching your video i think i will try using -0.7 then add sharpening later
🤙
Love the music Anh Vu
Artlist.io link in the description
FOR ME: This is not worth spending anytime playing with. Set ZERO and FORGET.
Hmmm I'm still struggling whit Sony a7iii I switched from canon laste month... I would like to suggest you get vidiQ for your TH-cam will boost your channel my wife use it helps allot mate 🙂
Thanks
Hi, Vu, could you share with us which NLE you used for post sharpening in this review?
Premiere pro
that's a really nice comparison. generally i agree with you, though people don't always shoot slog 3 to get more control, its actually to get more dynamic range.
i think I'll keep shooting at 0 detail because it seems the same with or without and its just another step to do in post that isn't really necessary.
if i accidentally forget to sharpen it while shooting -7 I'll regret it later, the client wont notice the difference anyway, worst case if it looks over sharpened you can soften it a bit.
the client will notice difference if you have more or less dynamic range though.
also worth to mention is that there are much more LUTS available for slog3 then pp off.
Slog3 gives you the most control over your image
Great video brother. Your beard hair needs to be more curly to look like pubic hair. Lol
😂😂 thanks for the clarification
Man..u really luv to talk about yourself
Q out of the topic. Is there any difference when choosing between lens compensation ON vs OFF if not using Sony glass?
No clue
I honestly start to think it's all very cosmetic, I try to look for a month for differences. Was thinking about sharpness and even to buy super expensive prime, but honestly I don't know how much that will change the perception of a film I'm doing
bro idk why you get dislikes immediately when you make such good content lol wtf
I always get 2-3 immediately upon posting within 5 seconds. My guess is some canon douchebag fanboi subscribed to my channel with notification and as soon as he gets it he dislikes .
People are trash
@@adamkozma6962 what did I say? 👀
@@nVuFilms I dislike you so much, I click it twice.
@@justcarryonnow 💯
What lense did you use to shoot this video?
Btw. What are your slog3 settings?
Pp8 standard settings
I must be blind. I couldn't tell the difference at all. 🤦♂️
bro the music is too loud in the mix, or ur voice too quiet. great vid tho
hi, i cant find out, where in the camera i can reduce the details. i work on the sony a7sII. Maybe someone can help me, thx :).
I prefer -7 with no sharpening in post.
Thank you!
em cảm giác s3 nó ko ngon bằng đám lumix s5 s1 s1h
You da man!
🤙🤙🤙
What about -4 for SOOC?
Good
😂😂
-7 looks natural everything else makes me puke :)