Thank You for the clear examples. All examples focus on 1 person and his behavior, like the examples in most videos. But how does operant conditioning gets applied on groups, like in a class room, or even more important, a society? Do you have any idea?
Good video, but although the procedure of operant conditioning has merits, behavior analysts have always eschewed explaining why it works, and for good reason, for a good explanation derived from neuroscience can upset a lot of apple carts. To wit: Operant conditioning and classical (respondent) conditioning do NOT reflect separate processes, only separate procedures. Reinforcement is due to changing information or expectancies, and not due to S-R linkages. Reinforcement is affective, or it feels good or bad, mainly due to the neurochemical activity in the brain as represented by dopamine and opioid systems. Reinforcement is continuous, not discrete, and occurs when information changes or when it is expected to change (also known as priming effects, as when you alert to an incoming surprise, such as a lottery drawing) Bio-behavioral or ‘unified reinforcement principles’ have been around and accepted by Skinnerian behaviorists and neuro-psychologists alike, and replace operant and respondent paradigms with a new way of looking at and implementing reinforcement that is based on ‘discrepancy’ principles. The good news is that all of this fits perfectly fine under what is called a ‘radical behaviorism’, the bad news is that behavior analysts will have to change how they explain operant conditioning, and even the procedures they use. References here from a lay and academic point of view. www.scribd.com/document/495438436/A-Mouse-s-Tale-a-practical-explanation-and-handbook-of-motivation-from-the-perspective-of-a-humble-creature www.researchgate.net/publication/262511550_Learning_processes_and_the_neural_analysis_of_conditioning
Thank you very much. Deeply Appreciated. Please continue your movies.
now I understand operant conditioning thank you
Thank you so much for this!
Thank You for the clear examples. All examples focus on 1 person and his behavior, like the examples in most videos. But how does operant conditioning gets applied on groups, like in a class room, or even more important, a society? Do you have any idea?
Great job!
Thank you..For giving this video...It helps a lot
Dang !!!! Helpfull
It's really helpful thanks
thank you so much, this helped me a lot to understand better this theory.
thanks for this video
Alot of asmr
quite productive😊
@Lorraine chacoun
Yes it does...
yo yo yo- jordi
the 'c' the kid was writing was backwards, great attention to detail guys.
I think it's a "?"
Your microphone is so good, you could do ASMR videos xD
cool
does operant condition come from B.F Skinner?
Yes bro !!
thank u tommoro my exam is there
Thank you, my psychology notes were not helping. You are great.
was helpful
My stress management teacher bought me here (:
Why are there like 10 videos on this? it's so simple to understand.
Good video, but although the procedure of operant conditioning has merits, behavior analysts have always eschewed explaining why it works, and for good reason, for a good explanation derived from neuroscience can upset a lot of apple carts.
To wit:
Operant conditioning and classical (respondent) conditioning do NOT reflect separate processes, only separate procedures.
Reinforcement is due to changing information or expectancies, and not due to S-R linkages.
Reinforcement is affective, or it feels good or bad, mainly due to the neurochemical activity in the brain as represented by dopamine and opioid systems.
Reinforcement is continuous, not discrete, and occurs when information changes or when it is expected to change (also known as priming effects, as when you alert to an incoming surprise, such as a lottery drawing)
Bio-behavioral or ‘unified reinforcement principles’ have been around and accepted by Skinnerian behaviorists and neuro-psychologists alike, and replace operant and respondent paradigms with a new way of looking at and implementing reinforcement that is based on ‘discrepancy’ principles. The good news is that all of this fits perfectly fine under what is called a ‘radical behaviorism’, the bad news is that behavior analysts will have to change how they explain operant conditioning, and even the procedures they use.
References here from a lay and academic point of view.
www.scribd.com/document/495438436/A-Mouse-s-Tale-a-practical-explanation-and-handbook-of-motivation-from-the-perspective-of-a-humble-creature
www.researchgate.net/publication/262511550_Learning_processes_and_the_neural_analysis_of_conditioning
Wag1 dusty yutes from criminology
Poor example for explaining punishment