'Just Answer The Question': John Duarte Goes Back And Forth With Buttigieg Over EV 'Slavery'

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 675

  • @j-sizzler5897
    @j-sizzler5897 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +322

    "Then why didn't you vote for the provision to move it to US soil". Hilarious and well-timed last line lol

    • @DIYtryer
      @DIYtryer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Yup Pete had a nice Burn 🔥 there

    • @squeektheweek6949
      @squeektheweek6949 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hilarious? I would say tragic.

  • @azzbaster9823
    @azzbaster9823 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +324

    He’s so concerned about the child labor, but voted no to have it moved to US soil. Hmmm.

    • @KD0AFK33
      @KD0AFK33 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Exactly

    • @geridinewhite869
      @geridinewhite869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hmm

    • @jasondashney
      @jasondashney 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Pete is bang on. John refuses to address Pete's point about how there are 159 products we use that cobalt for but Republicans only seem to care about one of them. That's a very good point which needs to be addressed.

    • @Defender40
      @Defender40 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It's because he loves oil money

    • @adrianpoesiat
      @adrianpoesiat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      So F-ing typical of GOP under the fat man. Block and divert.

  • @scottlaliberte4027
    @scottlaliberte4027 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +213

    Why does the right keep wanting to go toe to toe with Pete? He brings the facts and he is just that much more informed than the whole lot of 'em

    • @uberman6023
      @uberman6023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Your brainwashing is complete! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @scottlaliberte4027
      @scottlaliberte4027 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      Yes....facts and information have completely brainwashed me. Amazing what the truth will dooooooooooo

    • @robertstull8759
      @robertstull8759 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@scottlaliberte4027 Hey... be careful... he's an "uberman". No one will every get one over on him

    • @robertblount9985
      @robertblount9985 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      uberman, “your brain washing is complete,” is the only vague comment you can contribute to this discussion.?.?.

    • @Hadden733
      @Hadden733 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This Congress men admitted he didn't read this cobolt book he references and only listen to it on audio book. There a difference from reading and listening to a book one you can choose what information to listen to from the book so you not getting all the information as if you was reading from it page by page.

  • @dulpurp
    @dulpurp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +160

    "then why didn't you vote for the provision to move it onto us soil?"

    • @geridinewhite869
      @geridinewhite869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Dude want to get paid ! To bring those jobs here would mean he can't be Paid !!

  • @MrTeff999
    @MrTeff999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +151

    Pete would be my pick to replace Joe Biden.

    • @moniqueengleman873
      @moniqueengleman873 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Mine too. Without a doubt

    • @raimobrunning3657
      @raimobrunning3657 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I hope Harris will choose him as vice president 👍

    • @timlamb1156
      @timlamb1156 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What’s he done? Is there a biz that he created leading you to say that?

    • @raimobrunning3657
      @raimobrunning3657 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@timlamb1156
      Buttigieg is a smart man with an impressive cv

    • @MrTeff999
      @MrTeff999 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@timlamb1156 He has an extraordinary resume. Check Wikipedia. And I’ve watched him answer questions from hostile Republican Senators during hearings and he can more than hold his own. He’s smart and articulate.

  • @DavidBurckhard
    @DavidBurckhard 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    All of a sudden the GOP is concerned about people in the Congo? At a time when millions are dying from air pollution from burning fossil fuels. The argument against EVs is absolutely disingenuous.

  • @karens2111
    @karens2111 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    Thank you, Pete.

  • @gregking7926
    @gregking7926 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    Never get into a discussion with Sec Pete IF you don't have the facts in front of you. You will get Katie Portman'd every time..

  • @raulp8191
    @raulp8191 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +180

    Congressman: “Why haven’t you made it it better?!”
    Buttigieg: “Why didn’t you vote with us to make it better?”
    Congressman: ::silence::

    • @anthonyguinto3749
      @anthonyguinto3749 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You and I both know that if that bill was passed there would still be children labor.😡

    • @f1y7rap
      @f1y7rap 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The big ask of the Democrat fascist is to vote with them to make things better, rather than to accept criticism of failure both in design and implementation.
      The big ask of Democrat communists is to accept your chains once you've voted with them.
      Read history. Read Giovanni Gentili and Hegel

    • @JohnM3665570
      @JohnM3665570 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      You're calling the Democrats fascists????
      Really???
      Who is banning books?
      Who is forcing their religious views into schools?
      Who is taking away voter's rights and women's rights?

    • @josereyes-fd1qp
      @josereyes-fd1qp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@anthonyguinto3749 if we had these productions move to US soil then it would definitely stop child labor. Republicans like this guy want to claim that there might be child labor involved with creating electric cars, but doesn’t want to vote for a bill that would bring these productions here and allow them to be regulated. Unfortunately, he is in support of child labor for the other products that are produced just not electric cars because it’s being pushed by Democrats.
      Democrats like Pete pushed for the bill that would move those productions here. They were voted against by Republicans. But what about the children?

    • @SouredSpud
      @SouredSpud 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JohnM3665570 lil sis up there forgot that the Republican Party houses the neo nazis and everyone who wishes to talk away autonomy from anyone they don’t seem similar enough to themselves. Also the party of the very people who vote against and simultaneously claim credit for implementations of several forms of improvement on infrastructure and life conditions when it finally breaks through their wall of denial and actually becomes realized in wherever they lay their claim. Literally the party of “nuh uh. I didn’t say that. no u.”

  • @MatEmden
    @MatEmden 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    it never gets old watching Pete Buttigieg. Why is Biden president and not Buttigieg?

    • @breetai3
      @breetai3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      People in South Carolina decided for the rest of us.

    • @yourlifeisagreatstory
      @yourlifeisagreatstory 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I really hope they pick him for VP, and that he makes a run for president after.

    • @veronicarivera6275
      @veronicarivera6275 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree

    • @MelissaWong-yb6jx
      @MelissaWong-yb6jx หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@veronicarivera6275I agree with you too I don't know anything about Tim Waltz at all

  • @michaelmarsh8802
    @michaelmarsh8802 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    It’s like an elementary student trying to debate a college professor! Pete is always five moves ahead! It must frustrate them when he answers their questions because it makes them look ignorant!

  • @JohnM3665570
    @JohnM3665570 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    It amazes me that Republicans say they are concerned about regulations, but will do everything to get rid of regulations to help businesses.

  • @moniqueengleman873
    @moniqueengleman873 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Good God this senator is INSANE.

  • @Pseudo___
    @Pseudo___ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    the whole just come and let congress rant and with out really wanting replies is one of the most annoying things in congress

  • @Loosedook
    @Loosedook 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    “Then why didn’t you vote for the provision to move it onto US soil?”

  • @xlargetophat
    @xlargetophat 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    Why didn't he vote to mine on US soil?

  • @jamielancaster01
    @jamielancaster01 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    That Pete is a smart dude!

  • @therockinlobster149
    @therockinlobster149 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    So funny to see them try to argue w buttigied like this. They always fail lol

  • @reality1958
    @reality1958 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +42

    Advice…don’t challenge Pete Buttigieg

  • @forwardpeace
    @forwardpeace 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Excellent responses from Pete B.

  • @rogerbouchard7135
    @rogerbouchard7135 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Let him answer your question and you might learn something. Republicants are so rude when asking questions.

    • @PadreTommyG
      @PadreTommyG 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you for real? Pete B kept trying to talk over him. Great that they are trying to reduce the lithium and other minerals in the EV batteries but the vast majority I’d
      S mined in unsafe conditions and is controlled by China! But our left did not learn anything from COVID and our reliance on China for essential products and now we are going to make ourselves even more dependent due to a desire to increase EV even when we do not have the infrastructure to support the overly ambitious time frame.

    • @rogerbouchard7135
      @rogerbouchard7135 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @PadreTommyG If the Republicans would forward instead of backwards to the coal mining era they would be working towards new an innovative ideas instead of letting China take the lead on development of new technologies.

    • @PadreTommyG
      @PadreTommyG 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rogerbouchard7135 RB7135, I don’t want to be disrespectful but my honest initial reaction is “are you paying attention at all? China is still opening more coal plants while we have voted in Joe who caved to the radical left by trying to close down the pipeline, restore and increase regs, vowed to shut down the fossil fuel industry, over spent and has been way too aggressive on pushing E-vehicles when we do bot have the infra structure, increased on dependence on China for several of the raw materials. Any person with average intelligence understands the importance of a long term strategic plan to both transition to new energies, develop cleaner fossil based energy and have both a balanced and realistic approach.

    • @CorgiAndKeebs
      @CorgiAndKeebs 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They just go down a list of questions. They aren't looking for answers. There's a script and they aren't deviating because aren't as good of a debater.

    • @aidanwilliams9452
      @aidanwilliams9452 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@PadreTommyG Australia has some of the largest deposits of lithium, cobalt, and rare earth metals in the world. If the republicans actually cared about reliance on China, environmental impact, or work conditions, why not lobby for such materials to instead be purchased from Australia or as Pete said to produce on US soil? The reality is the republican party doesn't care, they feel attacked because their interest is with the oil companies and going for scaremongering rather than sitting down for talks with the democrats and foreign countries and trying to compromise. I understand EV's and solar panels aren't the only solution (if anything more public transport is, not more cars), but fossil fuels aren't either.

  • @geridinewhite869
    @geridinewhite869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Get em Pete !!!

  • @stephenbriggs1736
    @stephenbriggs1736 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Put a southern twang in a guys voice, an R next to his name, discuss anything related to the environment, women’s rights, and being part of a global economy, and you will be disappointed.

  • @ldbagwell
    @ldbagwell 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    And what is their concern about all the child labor reductions in the last year.

    • @jonathanmilo
      @jonathanmilo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly.

  • @owlegrad
    @owlegrad 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    What an amazing last line. “Why didn’t you vote” indeed

  • @stuffandnonsense8528
    @stuffandnonsense8528 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    PB really is excellent.

  • @jgmidnight
    @jgmidnight 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Bravo Pete!

  • @JoanGonzalez-ui6er
    @JoanGonzalez-ui6er 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    You go Sec. Buttigieg. The chairman was not interested in your answers.

  • @toddjennings5096
    @toddjennings5096 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    Duarte is a hypocrite, now a public one.

    • @EmMi-b4i
      @EmMi-b4i 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nah it's your gay buddy 🤣

  • @MartyAckerman310
    @MartyAckerman310 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Pete brings receipts

  • @Xmvw2X
    @Xmvw2X 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Pete and Jasmine are my two favorite people to watch in legislation just tearing all this bs to shreds. Both are ridiculously competent debaters.

  • @robertstull8759
    @robertstull8759 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    It's good to know that Rep. Duarte is going to vote for better worker protections in the US, especially for youth and child workers... and to move mining and EV production to the USA

    • @markabbott2281
      @markabbott2281 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, he want to help the GOP get rid of OSHA. You know, the republicans think there are too many regulations. Oh, if Trump gets elected he will get rid of the EPA too. China will be making all the electric vehicles for the world along with all the solar panels that power them.

  • @6spdkeg
    @6spdkeg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +123

    complete and utter failure.

    • @ZONEPRESSLLC
      @ZONEPRESSLLC 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      extremely successful if you're a democrat

    • @dandyandy642
      @dandyandy642 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      So successful in doing what they're told but not successful as in competency.

    • @ZONEPRESSLLC
      @ZONEPRESSLLC 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@dandyandy642 well, if you're a democrat, successful in competency also

    • @joeatalig5005
      @joeatalig5005 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      If Japan which is a smaller country can have high speed rail why can't the United States have it.

    • @6spdkeg
      @6spdkeg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@joeatalig5005 Japan probably didn't allow Beuracrats and 10 other 3 letter agencies and regulators suck all the efficiency out of theirs along with making cost 500% more than it should.

  • @keernhaslem1845
    @keernhaslem1845 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Buttigieg is so very good at sparring with these guys. They have their hands full.

    • @LarryLaughlin-l1g
      @LarryLaughlin-l1g 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      he speaks as though something has been stuck down his throat causing him to be hoarse

    • @KathyFewell-ev9zw
      @KathyFewell-ev9zw 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Buttigieg is pulling a Mayorkas. Going into a competition of words when all he has to do answer the questions ....simply.

    • @mikesampsel3333
      @mikesampsel3333 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, Duarte's BS

  • @roamiblu1833
    @roamiblu1833 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Since when does the GOP give a darn about slavery in the Congo? They *NEVER* gave a darn about it. In fact, they supported it by turning a blind eye. But NOW you want to be *concerned* with child slavery? What about the child-soldiers? That's part of the Congo, too.

  • @CoconutPalmPictures
    @CoconutPalmPictures 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Congress is a strange place. They ask a question, then don't let you answer.

    • @saluki7651
      @saluki7651 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Answer a question? Yes. Filibuster and use doublespeak? NO!!!!

    • @CoconutPalmPictures
      @CoconutPalmPictures 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@saluki7651 No, they didn't let him answer the question. I get the impression that some of the commenters on the internet are more interested in expressing their pre-determined opinion than gathering information to ascertain the truth.

    • @saluki7651
      @saluki7651 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CoconutPalmPictures He didn’t answer the question, rather he circumvented the query and propagated political ideology.

    • @CoconutPalmPictures
      @CoconutPalmPictures 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@saluki7651 The interviewer didn't let him finish answering, just cut him off. Probably because the interviewer had a different political ideology.

    • @saluki7651
      @saluki7651 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CoconutPalmPictures we have different interpretations of the posted video.

  • @ScottGraham-fy3pr
    @ScottGraham-fy3pr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    You know how you deal with forced child labor in foreign countries! Refuse to buy their product! If the product has no buyer there is no reason for producing it!

    • @theswiftschoolofselfhealing
      @theswiftschoolofselfhealing 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No one will.do that. Too many products and who is going to activate the boycott? Pple today don't seem to be that interested in standing up.

  • @jasondashney
    @jasondashney 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I can't believe I'm actually on the side of Pete Buttigieg here. His point about how we only care about slave labour for this one product is a very good one. John is way out of line here.

  • @Rock_Bill_Kaa
    @Rock_Bill_Kaa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +103

    Why is that “guy” allowed an open mic? He is so rude. He is a liar.

    • @pantarkan7
      @pantarkan7 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Being cordial and telling the truth are immediate disqualifiers for any posting in the current administration.

    • @stalker7892
      @stalker7892 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@pantarkan7 Yeah I agree! They ought to be cordial and tell the truth like "Trumpty Dumbty".😂

    • @gregh7400
      @gregh7400 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Well, he is a Congressman so I guess that's why he gets a mic and grandstands like the rest of them.

    • @wendyscott8425
      @wendyscott8425 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Good question. And he's my Congressman (for now) who can't seem to accept the opinions or facts this hearing might have shown him. I trust he'll be replaced by a more rational and polite Congressman in November.

    • @rickrobbins1037
      @rickrobbins1037 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He's a liar. ​@@pantarkan7

  • @RickCeppi
    @RickCeppi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Pete is right, congress has the power to stop this on its track by legislating that no batteries sold in the US (EVs, cell phones, etc..) can have any components from the Congo... of course that will never happen

    • @geridinewhite869
      @geridinewhite869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Money ,money ,money ! MOOONAY !!

  • @jamesbracht4881
    @jamesbracht4881 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Wow, what a master of double talk.

  • @cliffkilpatrick7430
    @cliffkilpatrick7430 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    If Duarte would zip it for a couple of minutes, he'd probably get an answer but he doesn't really want one. Hence his speechmaking and rhetoric.

    • @geridinewhite869
      @geridinewhite869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He knew who he was dealing with an educated and well informed ,knowledgeable intelligent Man !!

  • @richardadams6988
    @richardadams6988 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    😂I like Pete. The only problem is that he is highly sophisticated for yesterday's politicians....it seems very hard to go back to try and fix older problems that were never addressed before, now very costly and time-consuming.... only hope that Pete doesn’t give in.....and give in to all today's rhetoric....thanks, Pete ....

  • @MelissaWong-yb6jx
    @MelissaWong-yb6jx หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good question I was thinking of that

  • @stemmerman
    @stemmerman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Was there a question, or did John just want to babble and not let Peter answer?

    • @kristyandcowreact
      @kristyandcowreact 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      I'm guessing Duerte just likes to hear his own voice

    • @robertlee7606
      @robertlee7606 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pete doesn’t give any viable examples.

    • @kristyandcowreact
      @kristyandcowreact 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      ​@@robertlee7606wait... So, guess you didn't watch the vid? Duarte... That you?

    • @geridinewhite869
      @geridinewhite869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He just wanted to babble ! Ok ....he earned his pay that day .Dude reminded me of gym Jordan 😂

    • @geridinewhite869
      @geridinewhite869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@robertlee7606 he can't !! They ask him questions and then doesn't want him to answer by talking over him when he attempts to do so ,and to those who are actually listening its confusing.

  • @GardenVarietyMelissa
    @GardenVarietyMelissa 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I get so frustrated with the lack of politicians to stop talking and listen. So simple. One mouth, two ears. Maybe if we start listening twice as much to our brother, change will finally occur.

  • @cpe111
    @cpe111 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    It would help if tDuarte actually allowed Buttigieg to answer instead of grandstanding.

  • @PatriciaMarie100
    @PatriciaMarie100 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Buttigieg is a remarkably spectacular human being. Unusual to find someone as good as he is What a gift

  • @dougtwyford7284
    @dougtwyford7284 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you Mr President for your clarity...sorry I mean Pete..

  • @DemonHunterX1
    @DemonHunterX1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

    Can the witness just simply say, "No" that they don't want to answer the question? Just say you don't want to answer the question!

    • @matthewgoral4014
      @matthewgoral4014 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      He was giving a qualified answer to expose the bad faith of the Congressman's question. The reductive "yes or no" binary is an elementary debate tactic that is easily circumnavigated by qualifying an answer with factual context. That the congressman was too emotional to receive that context in good faith does not discredit it. Pete is an excellent orator and an intelligent politician, so of course he came with receipts. This video represents the general lack in finesse and intellectual integrity with which this congressman approached his time in this hearing.

    • @allonelife699
      @allonelife699 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@matthewgoral4014 Well said

    • @larryk2108
      @larryk2108 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Well when you’re asking a lopsided bullshit question you have to bring it in to context. When he gave them a clear rebuttal they just talked over him. Again they have nothing to

    • @krullerooi6845
      @krullerooi6845 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      It is clear the congressman did not want to hear a nuanced answer. Simply saying answer the question without context or subtext is just to make themselves look good. Anyone with a modicum of intelligence would add the subtext which always has a way of exposing the question as a gotcha question. The congressman's whole premise was cobalt mining creating slavery and the Secretary made clear we are using less and less of cobalt in EVs, and we now get cobalt as a by-product from other processes in the United States.

    • @martinutr
      @martinutr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@matthewgoral4014Boom! Well said!!

  • @mustangfreedom
    @mustangfreedom 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Staggering critical logic leaps necessary to even appear to tango with Mr. Pete.😂

  • @bikerbill052282
    @bikerbill052282 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    A Republican concerned about children, who would have thought? Don’t care about schools or lunch in schools.

    • @nekonari22
      @nekonari22 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      GOP is actively trying to make child labor legal in US (many GOP states have already passed laws towards this). Like hell they care about some colored kids in some "shithole" (according to their Supreme Commanda Drumpf) country far away.

    • @AngelinaLonero
      @AngelinaLonero 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂😂 what

    • @jasondashney
      @jasondashney 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't equate a concern with how somethings gonna be paid for with a lack of concern over who would be the beneficiary.

    • @josephkostinko739
      @josephkostinko739 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Remember when the Trump admin took the money from the school lunch program and added it to the military funding? They make me sick.

  • @petercristo992
    @petercristo992 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    John Duarte's a good congressman, well educated too. 🇺🇲

  • @rejean2744
    @rejean2744 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Another republican being schooled by Pete.

  • @paulcooper8335
    @paulcooper8335 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Is Duarte taking lessons from Jim Jordan on how to be ridiculous?

  • @SteelDinger
    @SteelDinger 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He said the word, in his opinion

  • @bryant505
    @bryant505 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Go, Pete Buttigieg! Go Democrats! Voting Blue!!💙💙💙

  • @joseypowell
    @joseypowell 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    How was he even supposed to address the topic if not given the space to do so. I see this all the time. They have these hearings just so the elected official can flap their jaw for their given amount of time and purposely don’t give the person time to address the topic. So frustrating.

  • @Melden81
    @Melden81 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I love The Secretary of Transportation! He’s no idiot.

  • @joannesullivan237
    @joannesullivan237 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    When are Gorsich, Alito, Thomas, &,Kavanaugh being subpoenaed to testify before Congress?

    • @Bholla75
      @Bholla75 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I find it interesting that TH-cam put a "translate to English" on your comment🤔
      Maybe it was too well said and TH-cam wants a fascist tangerine regime 😒

    • @f1y7rap
      @f1y7rap 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Bholla75 Read history. Fascism is SOCIALISM. Benito Mussolini was the editor of the Italian socialist paper and the lead of the socialist party. Before WW1 he, like many socialists, expected workers would band together and rise up against their "oppressors" without any borders. HE, like many socialists, saw that people held to nations over class. So Mussolini turned socialism from international to national, thinking that once others saw the success of his nation, they would also adopt socialism internationally. Mussolini also saw Lenin's implementation of Marx's ideas and chose to hold MUCH closer to Hegel, listening to Giovanni Gentili. If you don't LEARN from history, you, like all Democrats, will repeat history. Democrats are the party of Marx and Gentili.

    • @daleemrick9816
      @daleemrick9816 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      4 watt purpose

    • @joannesullivan237
      @joannesullivan237 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think they should answer to the American people about why they lied to Congress & the American people at their Congressional hearings. Why did they all lie about Roe, for instance? Why, after 248 years, have they decided to bestow full immunity on the President? Answer questions about Clarance Thomas questioning the propriety of Special Counsel Smith’s appointment? Why didn’t Thomas recuse?

    • @geridinewhite869
      @geridinewhite869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You forgot A Barrett

  • @spsm2022
    @spsm2022 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I love Pete. The dude is classy and intelligent.

  • @pauln624
    @pauln624 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    100 years ago with less tech and hand tools, we built this country quicker, better and cheaper. WHY?

    • @isaidwtfover
      @isaidwtfover 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Because God was on our side then.

    • @ronaldperry
      @ronaldperry 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      GOVERNMENT

    • @erinblaisure9761
      @erinblaisure9761 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Because the government allowed companies to use slave labor using the Irish, Chinese and blacks and before that, indentured servants, too!! Read a history book, would ya???!!!!!!!!

    • @ronaldperry
      @ronaldperry 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@erinblaisure9761 yeah. It has nothing to do with government regulations.

    • @wendyscott8425
      @wendyscott8425 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@ronaldperry True. Government regulations keep people safe on the job. The way people used to die on the job was horrendous before regulations.

  • @neilmckenzie1989
    @neilmckenzie1989 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ‘Answer my specifically worded and poorly focussed question rather than putting me in my place with real/actualfacts’

  • @JXZ-JAM
    @JXZ-JAM 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Crocodile tears from Congress. Shocker.

  • @cnbsdad
    @cnbsdad 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love Pete!

  • @cpollero53
    @cpollero53 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pete is a beast!!

  • @daleg324
    @daleg324 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Need to vote her out. She is already proving she cant handle it.

    • @NickLaDrama
      @NickLaDrama 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who?

  • @jennifercutrell7330
    @jennifercutrell7330 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pete is unmatched🙏

  • @EarthPersonPrime
    @EarthPersonPrime 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Republicants. No logic, only lies.

  • @jameswilliams2635
    @jameswilliams2635 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    he needs to go.

    • @bmcas19825
      @bmcas19825 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Why, because he makes the Repubs look stupid

    • @doctaflo
      @doctaflo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      i think he meant Duarte needs to go

  • @camf7522
    @camf7522 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If only the GOP would follow their own ideology completely and stop ALL federal government subsidy and tax breaks. The fact is no politicians will, so this cherry picking of objecting to subsidies for projects the oppose for other reasons is counterproductive for them.

  • @oldmancasey420
    @oldmancasey420 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pete is great

  • @genbabez
    @genbabez 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would be shitting my pants of if I had to go up against Pete.

  • @Sjrick
    @Sjrick 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That last statement by Pete was literally the equivalent of a three pointer in BB to win the game

  • @1927su
    @1927su 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    People have loved electric golf carts for years!

  • @nicholasmccormick4254
    @nicholasmccormick4254 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Perfect example of being intelligent yet harmful.

  • @stix2244
    @stix2244 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Buttigieg is clear, calm but in charge! Go Pete!

  • @GarryAndrews_
    @GarryAndrews_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This guy isn’t a liar, he’s worse. He actually believes he’s the good guy, and doing the right thing.

  • @thoughtsonfitness3249
    @thoughtsonfitness3249 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Oh look. Another liar. Does not have a single clue about construction or infrastructure. And do not even get started on the children of Congo.

  • @toplarry
    @toplarry 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    I hope his office toys are all packed.

  • @ImperialRis
    @ImperialRis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Go Pete!

  • @grannypattie
    @grannypattie 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Go Pete

  • @burningsporkdeath
    @burningsporkdeath 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Meanwhile we are not allowed to mine the raw materials for this stuff on US soil where we have strong environmental and labor protections.

    • @VYDZ
      @VYDZ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That is simply not true! A mine sits idle in the remote Salmon River Mountains along the state’s historic cobalt belt until the price of the mineral climbs up to $25 per pound.

    • @burningsporkdeath
      @burningsporkdeath 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@VYDZ Yes on that particular mine. I am commenting in regards to mine permitting and NGO lawsuits to block mining nationwide. I am currently working at a mine in AZ that is struggling to get off of the ground.

    • @robertstull8759
      @robertstull8759 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@burningsporkdeath Good. Mining should have strong environmental and labor regulations and protections. It's an incredibly dangerous and destructive practice, and if we, as a society, are going to say that we need that material for technological advancement then we should take full responsibility for the process necessary to do so. The workers should be getting paid in direct relation to the product they create while being ensured the protection of their life and health. At the same time the damage to the environment, which is kind of a requirement for humans to live in, should be mitigated and offset as much as possible. Otherwise it's not really benefiting us as a society or a species in the long run.

    • @burningsporkdeath
      @burningsporkdeath 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertstull8759 I do not disagree with any of that. From my 30 years in the industry I have seen that we have a very good regulatory system to prevent the sins of the past. The problem I have is that we rarely get to exercise it with modern techniques due to never ending lawsuits where they lie through their teeth to generate an emotional response to shut us down. We can tell the truth and do everything by the book and right and still lose because we are up against organizations with very deep pockets that will use propaganda and lies. Meanwhile more people are exploited in third world countries to feed world demand as a result. It makes me sick.

    • @josephkostinko739
      @josephkostinko739 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe not for long. If Trump is elected, he wants to get rid of the EPA.

  • @johnwduncan6707
    @johnwduncan6707 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Don't argue with Pete

  • @tc7486
    @tc7486 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pete for VP & President! Count on it.

  • @scottterry1659
    @scottterry1659 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    The government should never give money to industry

    • @johnallred716
      @johnallred716 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Lockheed Martin on line one...

    • @georgesotiroff5080
      @georgesotiroff5080 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I’m tickled that the federal government refused to assist Chrysler from going under back in the 1980s. To have had yet another viable American car manufacturer would have been a veritable disaster!
      Let other countries support their industries. We should never do so.

    • @ianbergman6245
      @ianbergman6245 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Great, stop with oil and agro industry subsidies then too.

    • @jimhofer8496
      @jimhofer8496 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oil companies are waiting in the lobby with your check Mr. Trump.

    • @chrishogan8125
      @chrishogan8125 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      LOL......Funny how that opinion is ONLY popular when it's EV's that are being subsidized! Meanwhile, how many banks, automakers, fossil fuel companies, defense companies, etc., have been subsidized in years gone by...!?

  • @johnr4898
    @johnr4898 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Trans Continental Railroad was constructed between 1863 and 1869 at a cost in today's dollars of$1.2 billion and built by hand labor. It is 1776 miles long. As of May 29, 2023 after fifteen years HSR has not laid one mile of track but it has sucked up hundred of millions of tax dollars.

    • @foreststewart1968
      @foreststewart1968 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The transcontinental railroad was built essentially through the forced labor of exploited Chinese workers through much of the West. No surprise, costs go way down when an unconstrained & powerful industry (in this case the railroads) can force desperate non-citizens to work in dangerous conditions for next to no pay.
      Also, do a little research, & you might discover just how many workers lost their lives building that transcontinental railroad that you're pointing to as an example of industry as it SHOULD be. I'd say that a great many lost lives is a pretty high price to pay... but a price that you are finding very easy to (conveniently) ignore. I'd say that you're failing to include some rather staggering details into your "cost" analysis of how things were done back in the good old days.

    • @procrastinatingpuma
      @procrastinatingpuma 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      CHSR isn't enslaving chinese people to get built...

    • @johnr4898
      @johnr4898 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@procrastinatingpuma prevailing wage was $35.00 Chinese were paid $30.00 per mo. The point is, we have machines to replace hand labor so, it should go at least as fast.

    • @geridinewhite869
      @geridinewhite869 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's all about getting a whole lot of money for doing nothing! How sweet.

  • @pantarkan7
    @pantarkan7 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The original rail project was going to cost $40B, have something like 16 (22?) stops, go 200MPH, carry thousands and be done in 10 years. 15 years later, cost is up to $140B, it's got 6 stops, will go closer to 80MPH, might get a few hundred passengers and will not be finished this century... but it's an important expenditure of funding. (insert eyeroll here)

  • @andresouza508
    @andresouza508 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Peter is awesome
    He should be this next president

  • @johngage9791
    @johngage9791 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's important for people to know if an electric vehicle make economic sense for them. Money talks.

  • @sammychin5235
    @sammychin5235 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Then why didn't you vote for the provision to move it to US soil". Humble pie Served

  • @dubya13207
    @dubya13207 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish Buttigieg would have answered “And aren’t you glad that we’re discovering the challenges of building high-speed rail now, during a relatively small and simple build over flat land between two relatively small municipalities, rather than during a much larger and costlier leg of the project?”

  • @erinblaisure9761
    @erinblaisure9761 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    How do put up with the stupidity, Pete?????????

    • @Susan-k6m
      @Susan-k6m 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go ask his husband😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @wickedtexan
    @wickedtexan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Imagine that the continental railroad across America was completed in 1869, in 2024 they cant even build a rail line in California

    • @harlanjackson6112
      @harlanjackson6112 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Slave labor for much of it, Chinese immigrant labor after slavery was abolished.

    • @bowlofcinder482
      @bowlofcinder482 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They used slave labour to do it. Tell me why you are in favour of that?

  • @ncalovini
    @ncalovini 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Why should everyone’s TaxDollars subsidize your neighbor so he can buy an EV ? If they’re so great, let the market decide

    • @wendyscott8425
      @wendyscott8425 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The market let me decide to get my Volt in2016, although I did get a rebate that covered some of the costs, but I would have bought it without the rebate. I love it. I spend about $15 a year on gas. More and more people are getting EVs. It’s good for the air and good for the budget. Oh, and I charge it in the daytime mostly because I have solar panels, plus it almost never needs an oil change.

    • @Bholla75
      @Bholla75 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      The market IS deciding, duh🙄
      That's why sales are up and this kind of legislation is voted for.

    • @Bholla75
      @Bholla75 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Don't see this kind of comment when you pay for banks and billionaires bail outs and subsidies 🙄

    • @swirlingvortex2022
      @swirlingvortex2022 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      As long as you apply the same logic to gas price support! Do you know how much we spend holding up the fossil fuel industry? No … thought not

  • @Doerakker
    @Doerakker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There republican senators are just full of it

  • @claytonwilliams4303
    @claytonwilliams4303 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Why should I help fund something I can't even buy it's bs I love gas cars anyway

  • @reid_dreamcatcher6017
    @reid_dreamcatcher6017 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    lol I don’t think they were expecting some dude who works in transportation to come out swinging lol.

  • @HawaiianNoona
    @HawaiianNoona 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mr. Burlison is so scared, he’s actually turning red and stuttering. Go Pete.

  • @edwardlouis3428
    @edwardlouis3428 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another Republican taken down by Pete?