Sony A7iv vs A7siii (FX3, ZV-E1) LOW LIGHT

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 74

  • @TheVoiceofReason4ya
    @TheVoiceofReason4ya 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Dude, the jokes and sound FX after are on point, great stuff, subbed!

  • @angwk
    @angwk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    A7IV is surprisingly close to A7SIII. At extreme high iso, A7IV does have bit more noise but A7SIII's image is also starting to degrade.

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      indeed, the siii has other advantages, noise is not a big deal between the two IMO. simply different approaches

  • @alvarosaravia3764
    @alvarosaravia3764 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Gracias, este es el video que buscaba!

  • @benjamindover4337
    @benjamindover4337 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    It takes a lot of guts to be out there in the dark with all that money in your hands. The IRS could pop out from the bushes and just snatch it all away.

  • @michialharris1850
    @michialharris1850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I like the A74 because it was sharp most of the time. The price makes more sense to me especially since I'm buying a G-master lens with it.

  • @MollyFitzBrown
    @MollyFitzBrown ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Was looking at this to compare my a7iv to the a7siii sensor that’s in the new zv-e1. I think the a7iv was sharper most of the time and hung in there well during extreme low light. The little light made a huge difference but both are great.

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  ปีที่แล้ว

      indeed, still going to get the zve1 😊, if it’s travel friendly, I’m there

  • @SilatShooter
    @SilatShooter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Appreciate the comparison! I was surprised, the A7IV holds up really well against the A7sIII. I rarely go beyond ISO 1200 so for me, the A7IV is plenty good and less money.

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Totally agree! the second gain for the siii comes at a penalty of softening while the 7iv looks much sharper and if noise reduction in post, would probably equal. for me, the most important aspect of high iso is retaining the colors, which the A7iv does without issue, should have mentioned that iso 102K is non native and internally boosted!

    • @SilatShooter
      @SilatShooter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CharlieVN thanks again! Really enjoy your videos! You answer questions I have with your videos. it's a great help!

  • @huyked
    @huyked 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for these tests of yours.
    And I love your sense of humor.

  • @radimsch
    @radimsch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    TH-cam destroys any noise with aggressive compression and algorithms, so it is really hard to see the differences. I guess if TH-cam is your main output than it is OK. How about download link with better quality compression? Source files? Thank you.

  • @johnnygelin8391
    @johnnygelin8391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Man... 🤣 You are so random with your jokes haha love it! Both the joke and the voice/tone which you use. Cracks me up every time. Keep it up!

  • @RingTheDoorbelll
    @RingTheDoorbelll ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks so much for this comparison. I'm looking to upgrade my hybrid shooting camera (I haven't upgraded since 2015)... I've spent the last week constantly going back and forth between the A7SIII & the A7 IV. Having watched so many comparison videos I'm starting to think the A7 IV may not be too bad a choice.

    • @paiman_
      @paiman_ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Buy the A7IV man. You won't be disappointed unless you really really need & use the 4K 120fps & 4K 60fps uncropped and better rolling shutter performance.
      Other than that, A7IV has the S III beat.
      Or you could wait until tomorrow to see if Sony will release the A7s IV

  • @syedarmaghanhassan4652
    @syedarmaghanhassan4652 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    a7iv just looked better in everyway. I think they are just charging for pro res.raw on a7s3 + 4k 120

  • @ASVideo
    @ASVideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great test, thank you! I'm going to switch from the A6300 to the A7IV and i think that the difference will be huge 😂

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      for video, it's going to be a big jump, I had the 6400 for a while and the battery was generally my biggest issue, I shoot a lot of video and it would deplete fast.

    • @ASVideo
      @ASVideo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CharlieVN yes, the NP-FW50 is awful...i have like 10 of them 😂

  • @streettale
    @streettale ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good comparison. I am documentary film maker where most of the time i have to shoot on natural light like moon light. Currently i am using a7iii. What would you suggest for my scenario. Thanks

  • @TimsWildlife
    @TimsWildlife ปีที่แล้ว

    Happy with my zcam m4 at 51200 iso with comparable noise. Another low light beast.

  • @CityWalks
    @CityWalks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great test. Very useful. Thanks so much -H

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @ZamoraChristian
    @ZamoraChristian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wow this video was amazing. the 7iv is really good

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It really is! Sold my Siii recently, the pros of the A7iv outweighed the cons, and for me, the ability to do a very good FF and a very good APS-C trumps faster framerates.

  • @kifley19
    @kifley19 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    A7iv looks better in the iso range most people would use.

  • @camerasandcoffee3466
    @camerasandcoffee3466 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video! Thank you for sharing!

  • @Pixelogystudios
    @Pixelogystudios 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just what I was looking for, thanks!

  • @translumination2002
    @translumination2002 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for doing this video comparison. I can't tell any difference in IQ up to 51,200 actually. At 102,400 they both look barely useable. I think it's the high contrast that kills the image. If there was something more uniform they'd both look better. Just a question. When you look on your monitor rather than TH-cam does it look pretty much the same? You sold your A7s III so I can assume that they do?

  • @ikoyDaPnoy
    @ikoyDaPnoy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video although I did wish you had a few tests at the higher ISO's with the background or subject being properly exposed.

  • @TheRealJeffDiamond
    @TheRealJeffDiamond ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this video - it's amazing! The A7iv is only a little noisier than A7siii. I was just curious - when you were making these videos, what frame rate were you using? Were both at 4K 30fps? Thanks so much. :)

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  ปีที่แล้ว

      I cant remember, maybe 4K 24? I flip around the two frame rates too often.

  • @Alien_Cuts
    @Alien_Cuts 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:20 hahaha love that comment, keep it real bro

  • @chinitopinoy1726
    @chinitopinoy1726 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You should collab with N.Vu films on a video. 👍

  • @darbaz1192
    @darbaz1192 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    very useful, thanks👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @BeAboutThatLife
    @BeAboutThatLife ปีที่แล้ว

    Also the sharpness can be attributed to the iv having better lens

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  ปีที่แล้ว

      pretty sure they use the same lens, I have a pair of lenses for these tests but I could be wrong depending on when made.

  • @louinekay
    @louinekay 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi, I usually shoot aperture priority for videos on my Sony A7iv. Is it okay to set my ISO to 800-12800. Will I still get cleaner footage? Thank you.

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      800 base is for SLOG formats and it is not exposed like photos and requires a LUT in post, which is not difficult to do

    • @louinekay
      @louinekay 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I’m using S-Log2 because my laptop cant’t handle 10bit. Is it okay to set auto ISO to 800-12800?

  • @-agenda-8518
    @-agenda-8518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A7IV Sharp video 4k 24,25,30 fps! like 7k. better body, end 33mpx, end chipest. I buy a7iV.

  • @CelebrityLyrics
    @CelebrityLyrics ปีที่แล้ว

    3:12 What is that grey filter being removed? Is that done during editing?

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  ปีที่แล้ว

      LUT being applied

  • @JairusJoy
    @JairusJoy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    awesome video!! love the jokes

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you like them!

  • @tungprince1102
    @tungprince1102 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love A7M4 !

  • @303badassboxer
    @303badassboxer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video

  • @DigiDriftZone
    @DigiDriftZone ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder if the new AI chip would focus better on the ZV-E1?

  • @БольшойБратухин
    @БольшойБратухин 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey! Can you give me a shot from a7 IV shown on the 5th minute (at 12800 ISO) to download? I can see hard banding there in the sky, so I'd like to check if it's made by TH-cam or it goes from a camera.

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      www.dropbox.com/s/607aut23lay3lo2/2-19-2022%20screenshot%2010-52-48%20AM.jpg?dl=0

  • @l.knaturfilm9878
    @l.knaturfilm9878 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Es ist immer noch zu viel Licht vorhanden für einen richtigen High Iso Test 😉... Geht raus aus der Stadt, in die Natur bei Dämmerung und dann sieht man technische Fortschritte oder weniger👍

  • @syedarmaghanhassan4652
    @syedarmaghanhassan4652 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:12 A74 looks way more sharp and same low-light as A7S3. Probably focus problem

  • @raytracingcj733
    @raytracingcj733 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Min 10:22 a qué velocidad de obturacion estás grabando?

  • @dapunkof1975
    @dapunkof1975 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is in Slog3?

  • @babyyou4287
    @babyyou4287 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A7iv slightly sharper

  • @vitorazinheira2195
    @vitorazinheira2195 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For me up to ISO6400 the A74 is a lot better even at 12800 not bad. I'm surprised .

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      and....... my siii is for sale 🤣🤣🤣

  • @MestreMur
    @MestreMur 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ISO 100 - 6400: SONY A7IV WON!

  • @AzharNazzar1
    @AzharNazzar1 ปีที่แล้ว

    Low light isn't only thing to chose camera
    95mbit per second
    4k 120 fps with no Crop A deal Breaker

    • @BreakdanceMusic
      @BreakdanceMusic ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is a little with 120fps. It's only 1.1 but there is :p

  • @Willclarkmusic_
    @Willclarkmusic_ 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    underperform like a middle aged man 🤣

  • @IvanGRANID
    @IvanGRANID ปีที่แล้ว

    Visualy the same

  • @AlphaCentauri24
    @AlphaCentauri24 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is just another video that confirms A7iv has bad skin tones.

  • @VeeTravels
    @VeeTravels 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am sorry, Guy with Camera, not gonna lie, but this video was pretty bad. I honestly hated it -- you need to learn how to give a more objective perception of these cameras.
    The A7IV is trash for the price/performance compared to A7III which is half the price. A7SIII easily wins because of no 4K crop at 60fps.
    Not once do you mention the best feature which is gyro-stabilization.
    Please redo this video.

    • @CharlieVN
      @CharlieVN  2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      it is a low light comparison, there are separate videos comparing the A7iv to the A7siii or A7iii on my channel. Once again, this is a low light comparison.

    • @VeeTravels
      @VeeTravels 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CharlieVN Oh I see. My bad.

    • @Switchkyng
      @Switchkyng 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For me, the 4K crop is no issue whatsoever. So it’s a bargain. I understand that it’s an issue for most, which is barely a work around, but for most of us who give a rats ass about crop benefit from the a7iv.

    • @michaellim4165
      @michaellim4165 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A7SIII is $1000 US dollars more so of course it's better. The A74 price/performance easily trumps the A7III. Also, the price isn't half it's only $500 US dollars less. Let's compare MSRP and not eBay prices to be more consistent.

    • @jerryloradrifter
      @jerryloradrifter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      VeeTravels- your comment is pretty bad. When you have criticism, you should consider a different approach- opinions are just that, many may not agree with your perspective either…

  • @8ball758
    @8ball758 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank god I bought the A74.