Top 10 Multiple Launch Rocket Systems | Best MLRS in the World
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 มิ.ย. 2024
- Multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) have become an integral part of modern warfare, providing swift and effective support to ground forces. With their ability to launch multiple rockets over long distances with high accuracy, MLRS have become a force to be reckoned with on the battlefield. Whether you're a military enthusiast, a student of military history, or simply interested in the latest advancements in defense technology, this video is for you. So, let's dive in and discover the top 10 multiple launch rocket systems in the world!!!
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![จังหวะนี้ - เม้ก อภิสิทธิ์ [ Official MV ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4gQRZCkRyiU/mqdefault.jpg)
There are several faults in this list and the info about missiles and systems..
Even the name is wrong: should be multiple rocket launch system. Else, how do you launch a rocket multiple times? What is this, a falcon 9?
This channels quality has seriously degraded...
@@Phil858 the name is correct, it is an "MLRS" NOT "MRLS". You are the wrong one
Its an AI channel
Man dosnt get the joke@@tomokazu2235
The LYNX (which changed the name to PULS) can also fire a 300km “predator hawk” missiles
See if you can get detailed info in South Africa air defence systems like the Mkonto missile ect
Where is South Korean Chunmoo? System that is even better than Himars. Who made this video? Are you joking?
The video is from an American, what do you expect?
Its bigger and a bit heavier than M270. But unlike M270, its unarmored and uses wheels instead of tracks. And unlike HIMARS, its not mobile enough. HIMARS on the other hand can be deployed quickly to the front lines as it is light enough to be carried by a C-130 Hercules, which also don't need a runway to takeoff and land. One would need a proper airfield and heavier aircraft to transport both M270 and K239 Chunmoo. So in terms of mobility, US M142 HIMARS and Brazil's Astros II tops. Another thing to add M270 is not manufactured by the US alone but also by France, Germany, and Italy. But lightweight MLRS and heavyweight MLRS should be separated not like this video.
@@johnsilver9338 So you should update your data about Chunmoo. Poland ordered Chunmoo and it will be build on armored Polish Jelcz trucks.
@@albertkowalski5629 What that has got to do with anything I said?
You are right. The MLRS system means nothing to be launched unconditionally. It is very important to reach the correct distance and target quickly. Safety is very important when handling, and the speed of how the shell is replaced after launch is also important. What's the point without automation? The price is also important. South Korea's MLRS system has already been exported to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Poland.
The Tornado S has a rang of 124 miles with Glasnos guided rockets
no 120 km not miles
Hey, Jordan, how many rockets do you want your mlrs to have.
Jordan: *YES*
What is the MLRS called?
WOW!! Do they come with 100,000 rockets per system? Congrats!!
avibras is developing what is likely to be the successor to the astros 2, including a variant on an 8x8 chassis
@@evangus Yeah like chinese right?
@@evangus O Astros II era temido pelos norte americanos, deixavam muitas baixas do lado americano. Havia planos especiais para neutralizar os Astros II na guerra do golfo, então, armas Brasileiras são ruins?
Very nice video but it would've been more informative if weapon systems which are capable to neutralize the missiles systems had been included in the video.
?
The South African Bateleur (40-tube MLRS) was omitted from this comparison, and I think more out of ignorance than anything else.
Lots of good info but I wish the video included max speeds of the rockets
This is awesome.
Indian Pinaka's recent upgrade🥵🔥🔥🔥🗿
M142, M240 and PULS, K239
Korea K239 Chunmoo is ranked 1st in the world
And it's certainly much better than Pinaka or Huragan
Elbit puls?
Elbit's Puls should be within top 3
Thats LYNX. Upgrade it and you get PULS.
Astros 2020 pode disparar missiel ate 300km e tem desenvolvimento de ate 1000 km
There is no on going conflict in J&K, you want to say its on going terrorism in J&K. I am sure Pinaka is deployed in LOC not in civil areas.
Watching this channel is basically like watching someone playing "vintage car card game"; You beat me in mph? I beat you in bhp :p
Hello from malaysia
Hello when and where were pinaka deployed in J&K ??
Nowhere, he just made it up
Military Malaysia army operation astros ll launcher roket from Brazil
You need a lot of them like the russian....and can produce a lot more cheaply
How the hell kooryong mlrs of south Korea not in the list its better than hurricane lol
China PCL-191 is Beidou satellite guided similar to HIMAR. Accuracy similar to HIMAR but has longer range than HIMAR. 🦋
Claims Uragan has 16 tubes and shows 40? 2:57? And Uragan has a range of 550km.. so wtf is this video? .
No TOS1A?
MLRS would be second in my opinion.
Why do Arab countries prefer the Astros? Because it has already been heavily used in battles in those nations, including against Americans and allies, with success. Which one is the best? I don't know, but I'm going to buy what has already been tested on the battlefield in the most successful way.
The answer to this is quite simple
There was no M-242 HIMARS in 1982 Astros II is the father of HIMARS and HIMARS is the son of Astros II At that time, the only multiple rocket system that the United States and Allies had was the M-278 and a few others that were not considered the players at that time.
HIMARS only came into existence centuries later in 2005 through examples of the Astros II captured by the United States and England during the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
The countries that acquired Astros II, among others, know that Astros II is unique, in addition to, of course, its political geopolitical advantages Today, to break this barrier, the United States sent HIMARS to Ukraine, marketing Brazil could send Astros II but Brazil's geopolitical position would not be favorable until then
Hi
Great video. I agree with the ratings, but some platforms are a better value than others. Of course the American and European systems cost way too much and require much more maintenance and repairs. The durability of the American MLRS tracked vehicle is not very good and it is underpowered and in capable of fording rivers. The Russian platforms are the most reliable and durable. Low cost and extremely effective with ease of use for troops is the reason I would go with the latest generation Russian equipment that is just now coming online. Sarma and others...😊
Nope. Russian MLRS lack versatility and mobility. NATO MLRS have different rockets for different ranges. For example, M142 HIMARS have the same dimensions and weight category of BM-21 Grad, but can fire rockets equivalent to Iskander's range and even more. It can be quickly deployed to the front lines as it can be transported by C-130 Hercules which don't need an airstrip to take-off and land. The only lightweight MLRS with the same versatility in terms of rocket range is Brazil's Astros II. Russia don't have anything equivalent. An armored version with twice the payload and uses tracks which is perfect for rugged terrain is US M270 and European MARS II. Again Russia don't have an armored tracked MLRS with the same versatility.
@johnsilver9338 il-76 doest need runways either. America vehicles get stuck in the mud, tons of videos right here on TH-cam showing that they cannot go right to the front line. China could cut off the part supply to HIMARS anytime. American/NATO production is so slow!!!! The equipment is finicky and maintenance intensive. Service readiness rates are very low compared with Russian equipment. American junk is being destroyed in Ukraine much faster than it could be replaced by factories!!!
@@matthewlewis-zw3tf Yet Russia lost 1200 tanks. 🤣👍
@@matthewlewis-zw3tf Also US produced 5 times more F-35s than J-20 in the same time. While also being more advanced.
@@matthewlewis-zw3tf China don't have a hand in the production of any NATO equipment. Its the other way around as China needs US chips for both miltary and civilan use.
M270 and HIMARS №1 (accuracy and range is insane)
Unless GPS is jammed.
It’s basically exactly the same the only change it’s the vehicle wheels that’s it 😂😂😂.
it is better only on paper
@@RubbittTheBruise It has INS for backup.
Not anymore. maybe 10 years ago this was true, but now it's not the best anymore.
The new Chinese A300 and WS-2D are the best MLRS today: more range and more capabilities than any other
India 🇮🇳😘😘
number 4 iran fateh 360
bm 21?
Spyder defense
The Korean Chunmoo and the Israeli puls system by Elbit should have beat out several of these systems. 🇺🇸🤝 🇮🇱🇰🇷
Chunmoo is bigger and a bit heavier than M270. Same with Israel's PULS. But unlike M270, both Chunmoo and PULS are unarmored and uses wheels instead of tracks. However in terms of mobility, US M142 HIMARS and Brazil's Astros II tops. Both HIMARS and Astros can be deployed quickly to the front lines as it is light enough to be carried by a C-130 Hercules, which also don't need a runway to takeoff and land. One would need a proper airfield and heavier aircraft to transport M270, K239 Chunmoo, and PULS. But lightweight MLRS and heavyweight MLRS should be separated not like this video.
@@johnsilver9338 but chunmoo very cheap
@@gzs8647 Not very cheap. Chunmoo is around 3M while M270 is 4M.
Where is Valkiri and Bateleur | Legendary 127mm multiple launch rocket systems of South Africa
Only
cool video but the ranking is so wack for alot of reasons just dose not make sense at clearly reload time is not valued by you and unguided rocket system's ranked higher than guided makes 0 sense very strange
Dosnt himars have a range of 300+
Το HIMARS είναι το καλύτερο
Μέχρι στιγμής.
Fateh rocket Pakistan
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته المعده تطلق صاروخ صاروخ او اثنين اثنين من الممكن زيادة القدرة بحيث انها تمتلك حاضنتين فقط للاطلاق وباقى المساحه المتاحه مخصصه للصواريخ ويتم التلقين الالى لحواضن الاطلاق بحيث يتحقق سهولة اعادة التعمير مع وجود عدد اكبر للحموله الواحده والله ولى التوفيق وهو جل فى علاه الموفق والمستعان
M142...6th place??
With Proven accuracy and 310 mile range missile(prsm) rolling off the assembly line,with customers stepping on each other to buy the system,the most sought after mlrs system in the world,..by far!(paying twice the price over most of the other systems)...and you think 6th place?
In terms of characteristics, the M14 is worse than the M270, not to mention the “Tornado-S” of Russia. Secondly, in any Western statistics he is in 5th-6th place and no further.
Cant be arsed to watch it as i know I'll be some yank crap.
❤❤❤❤❤A🎉🎉🎉🎉
Pinka Mk 2 which upgraded version has a range of 120 kms
israeli PULS is better than most of these mlrs in the video. The israeli PULS is a upgraded version of the HIMARS.
№1 MLRS 186 miles firing range ofc. But you have to shoot one rocket you say depends on the rocket type but you are not saying that it shoots 1 rocket and all those who shoots 186 miles are one rockets and can be shot down by anti air systems of 60s 70s
GMLRS (HIMARS) missiles were also shot down by the Pantsir system in Ukraine - there is a video of dismantling the wreckage of this missile lol.
American Propangadist
👍🇷🇺👍🇷🇺👍🇷🇺👍🇷🇺
What a joke video. They listed old soviet outdated Systems but they forgot about Chunmoo from South Korea which is the best MLRS in the world right now.
it is better only on paper
Leaving out the father of all MLRS , the BM-21 , the MLRS system most used in war and having as number 1 that expensive American crap , M270 , takes credibility out of this list 😞.
Lol I agree 😅
BM21 is very limited by only short range rocket launcher (40 km only). It is literally useless for any long-range combat mission. It doesn't matter if it's the most produced and most used rocket launcher, the numbers don't make it a better system. It's still very limited in range and capabilities.
We dont like this neighborhood block
You forgot one of the best in the world ever made, and that is the Serbian Oganj M77...
This guy tried to make a video about fighter jets and he is just flat out talking out of his ass
HIMAR range is 80 kms...not 186 miles