Regarding the the use of historical photographs, remember that back then it was a rather huge deal, one might only be photographed once in a lifetime, so people were always looking their absolute best in them. It doesn't reflect what they looked like on your average day.
I love how there a camp interactions that show he stills loves abigail and jack,he just wants to avoid the responsibilitys.He changes for the better when jack is kidnapped. Edit:Also,even in early chapters at his worst,he calls out dutch for his bad behavior and blames him for their problems.He sounds completely through with him by the end of chapter 4.
And likewise with Dutch by the end of Chapter 4, has grown suspicious of him and believes that Abigail has poisoned John against himself. It explains why he was so paranoid of John being the rat at Lemoyne bank job and planned to leave him to swing in Chapter 6.
john’s durability is almost cartoonish. it’s insane. obviously johns pretty muscular, but he is a lanky lean fella, second tallest in the gang (besides daddy dutch) so you’d expect him to be… ‘brittle’ i guess.
@@cantnevercould9660that's literally just gameplay... each male NPC in its generality are built off the exact measurements of height to save resources etc. there are moments or snippets where a playable character is described, to which Arthur is usually & or typically described as a 'big man' there's always emphasis on the 'big man' on Arthur which doesn't just mean that he's bulky with a mesomorphic build at 5'10 - 5'11... with John on the other hand, his proportional representation via the opening (& many but not all times in cutscenes) shows that he isn't exactly 5'10 - 5'11, however in gameplay then it'd seem like that considering how games are built off regarding designing the measurements if each character, especially in an open-world game.
I've been screwing around with the idea of a John Marston playthrough of Fallout New Vegas, so the question of if he would survive the Fallout wasteland, as presented in the poll, is something I'm genuinely interested in. Nonetheless, yay, the grand sequel to "how historically accurate is Arthur Morgan" exists now and John apparently is too.
I think something important to remember is that John's very old fashioned for his time. RDR1 takes place in 1911. 1899 was really pushing it for cowboys and outlaws, but 1911 is just 3 years before WW1. Machines are being automated, cars aren't a fad and are quickly becoming an everyday sight, airplanes are a thing and they're gonna start dropping bombs soon, the roaring 20s are less than 10 years away. Everything about John is really kinda dated for his time
In the late 1800s and early 1900s, men who wanted to appear as gentlemanly as possible had very short hair. As well as professional public servants, clerk owners, and most jobs dealing with people on a regular basis
John is like 6’4 in rdr1. When you’re in town or at a farm he towers over everyone and outfits show off his physique and the simpleton is ripped. The 4 years he spent at Beacher’s Hope took the scrawny raspy little boy we are handed after Arthur dies and turned him into a unit
John is not 6'4". Firstly, that would've made him about 8 - 10 inches taller than most of the male characters, which is not the case. Secondly, John is not that much taller than Javier who's said to be about 5'8". While John is probably taller than average, he's not 6'4". He's most likely not even 6'0".
It's never easy to marry duche cinema stereotypical references and actual historical reality for a character at that time, but I think the result is to me is a perfect rack, never too ridiculous nor too believable to grasp the exaggeration from western media.
Would be amazing if you’d cover the legend himself dutch van der linde Always wondered if the harsh circumstances of the old west can give birth to a maniac like him
3:53 He also got beaten by the Mexican Army, won a fist fight against Aquila (that guy in Ridgewood farm who was built like a bear and got mad that John shot his hat), and in Undead Nightmare, got away walking after experiencing a train crash. Not to mention he kept standing after being shot 20+ times before dropping dead.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I remember at the beginning of chapter one it mentions that John was wounded by a bullet when they escaped the Blackwater heist, so yeah... The bastard is tough to kill.
the actors for john dutch and arthur gave their characters specific heights in an interview dutch 6'0 arthur 5'10 john 5'10 its not their real l ife sizes but its been confirmed canon
Whenever comparing to photos from the time, you have to keep in mind that photography at the time was still a new thing and quite expensive, so people getting photographs (unless it was at a worksite or taken for legal records such as prison intake etc.) would have more often then not tried to go out of their way to clean and 'pretty up' to look their best for their pictures. It's not like today where most pictures are casual and on the fly with little preparation outside of special occasions, almost every photo back then was a special occasion. It's likely most men shaved before getting pictures, stubble was likely very common most of the time. Same with neatly styled hair. Hair was probably loose and unkempt most of the time, especially when working.
John Marston resonated so well with me due to how he seemed like the perfect blend of every cowboy from every western I ever saw. To this day, his character is so perfect, I have never once felt a need to play Red Dead Redemption 2.
see, you got the same feeling everybody else did before RDR2. "Man, John is the best character ever". But let me tell you, as someone who was in the exact same boat, RDR2 was unbelievably good. Like, Arthur is the best video game protagonist and maybe even character I have ever experienced.
@@realdaggerman105 I've seen enough of the game to know there are definitely some awesome things about Arthur, but I'm not trying to ruin something that was so perfect to begin with.
Agreed. Starkly different characterizations and body types. No a shade on the video or the creator by any means by I would've loved to see this video more with a consistently written John across both games.
@@pandagamer3184 Technically, no, they aren't. But characterization-wise (yeah, I've heard the retorts, I don't agree it's character development) and appearance wise, it's as if they are.
@@themadtitan7603 lowest weight john in rdr2 is pretty accurate to rdr1. Also keep in mind john is not in the best headspace and probably does not sleep a lot in rdr1 making him look older in the face.
Bro, you are absolutely COOKING on the editing. I also won’t be able to comment or see your videos for a while so I wish you look on your channel and series
Marston apparently means “Town in a marsh” what exactly the guy who came up with giving that name to his kid and what rockstar intended probably will never be answered I guess. Extra odd since most of the game takes in a desert. I don’t think the scars are accurate, those look like claw scratches and dogs, especially wolves are not known to use claws to hunt, only bites, hence they don’t retract like cat claws, which are used as weapons. If it was a bite rip it would have to be square. And that brings the question why didn’t they just go for his neck as they’re meant to if they could reach his head.
Duke showcase: The Grand Green gunslinger Green bowler hat Green shotgun coat (Optional) black Thompson vest White stand-collar overshirt Dark brown fancy pants Dark brown fine leather suspenders Brown and black multi-tone half chaps Brown deluxe QuickDraw boots Dark Brown & silver gerden rider spurs Dark green dress tie Black riding gloves Upgraded gun belt Upgraded primary holsters Upgraded off hand holster No bandolier Remove satchel using rampage Level 6 handlebar mustache Level 0 chin Level 0 sideburns Level 4 left parted fade with pomade (In some lights the outfit can look black to show the green I would recommend the light of beechers hope)
Spencer carbines in 1899, 1907 or 1911 would have been heavily obsolete, the US Military stopped using them after the Civil War because they wanted to streamline ammunition after having dozens on dozens of calibers from the ACW. That being said they would have been sold off as surplus,
Billy the kid turned informant and was betrayed. The fact you didnt find that in your research is crazy. He testified for the state and governor of arizona promised immunity, sheriff still shot him in the dark without declaring himself.
2:00 John is Scottish 5:50 John took his first life at 11 and died at 38, Wes Hardin took his first life at 15 and died at 42 meaning they both killed for 27 years.
cowboys are herders, and animal caretakers. Not gunfighters, cowboys did use guns, not colt saa's though, they were expensive, so they mainly used hand me downs, like percussion revolvers, rifles, or cheaper alternatives like Remington Revolvers, Surplus S&W no.3, if we go into the 1880s, and percussion revolvers. Ones who did get them either saved up to get one, or were rich. Mythos that come with cowboys are false, sure Little Arkansas, Billy the Kid, Bass were ranch hands. But they were outlaws, robbers, the only gunfighters who actually had a feared and documented fight: Little Arkansas. He actually knew how to fight hand to hand, and was a deadly gunfighter, but like most. He is mostly a myth, and legend, not too documented. Wild Bill Hickok, Wyatt Earp and Doc Holiday, pretty much chalk up to romanticized versions. In reality, they'd be weaker in real life, not exactly what we see in movies. So the difference in gunfighters: people who have retained a reputation in gunfights, outlaws, lawman, and any other occupation. Cowboys were just ranch hands, basic at everything, or dumb.
Honestly the way that Dutch's gang differs from gangs of the time is almost like a cult, only he didn't have them doing strange things that would be out of the ordinary for gang activity. He was kind of a central personality that a group of people gathered around ideologically. Like a lot of cults though, eventually the idealism meets a reality check, and it all fell apart. I don't think Dutch's gang is implausible along this line of thinking. He's a charismatic man with a strong vision for what freedom means and it spoke to people who were vulnerable like orphans and those who are othered or ostracized, he is skirting that line between gang leader and cult leader.
John's height is never specifically stated to be 5'10". People often use "Made Up Characters Wiki" as a source, but information on that site is non-canon. However, 5'10" - 5'11" is a plausible height for John. In the RDR1 mission "Landon Ricketts Rides Again" John mentions that Javier is 5'8". When John and Javier are standing next to each other in "Gates of El Presidio" they seem fairly similar in height, though John in slightly crouching. In addition, Benjamin Byron Davis (Dutch's voice actor) stated that Dutch was canonically 6 foot, which is significantly above average for men at the time (the average male height in that timeframe would be anywhere between 5'6" - 5'8"). In most scenes, Dutch appears to be taller than most male characters, including John and Arthur. So while John and Arthur are certainly above average for the timeframe, they're not 6 foot.
Arthur is 6’ 1 (185 cm) a little smaller than Dutch who is 6’2 foot (188cm) John is 5’11 (179 cm) it makes sense because in a lot of missions in RD2 the people who know arthur and see John says that Arthur was taller . and we know dutch is the tallest
@@Nocoincidoconfichajesdelfutbol Like I said, you got this information from "Made-Up Characters Wiki" which is a site that contains non-canon information. Benjamin Byron Davis specifically said that Dutch was 6'0". That information is canon because it came directly from an actor (voice and mo-cap). If Arthur really was 6'1", then he would tower over almost everyone in the game. But he doesn't. He's also not that much taller than Javier, who's 5'8". Arthur is most likely around the 5'10" - 5'11" range, which would be above average male height in 1899.
yeah maybe johns loyalty is inaccurate but im sure finding a bad bitch with an attitude like abigail in the 1800s was like finding a mechanical pencil on the classroom floor
A good dlc for rdr2 would probably be all the way back to when Arthur was first adopted by Dutch and Hosea, and they could have a time skip of 5 or 6 years each skip being an hour or 2 of story content with 30 minutes or so worth of side content for each time skip all the way until we get to a couple months to a year before the ferry heists. Thats just an idea I thought would be interesting.
I'm actually starting my 2nd playthrough of RDR2, and apparently, during the Blackwater Massacre, Javier mentions that John got shot, as well as Davey and Mac Callender, though it could be put up to debate due to the fact there's no evidence or other mentions of John being shot other than this one piece of dialogue, and if anyone's wondering, I'm talking about the 'Enter, Pursued by a Memory' mission in Chapter 1
Just wanna correct something, John is only impatient with time wasters which is half the cast in the beginning, look at later in the game he actually has to be very patient to get what he wants, which is Javier and Bill, when people constantly try waste his time and fool him around that's when he is cold.
I feel like pre 1899 john is gooner and that guy who hates furries but jorks to them, late 1899 john is the quitting his gooning and porn addiction, 1907 john is man not knowing his internet identity, 1911 john is the goat and 1914 john is just hotline miami characters in 1992
The long awaited sequel to how historically accurate is Arthur Morgan
youknowhowlongivebeenwaitingforthis
Oooimbouttamakenameformyselfhere
now we just need to wait for how historically accurate is uncle
@@dukemeiser19 bro Gambit was so funny
Even though John’s loyalty to Abigail is inaccurate, I’m not surprised as finding a dommy mommy like her back then was pretty rare
@@jarrellmarcell5512 truely was a treasure to behold
💀
🙁
@@dukemeiser19 believe me, I’m still looking.
on god
Regarding the the use of historical photographs, remember that back then it was a rather huge deal, one might only be photographed once in a lifetime, so people were always looking their absolute best in them. It doesn't reflect what they looked like on your average day.
true
in chapter 3 there is an interaction where john flirts with karen while he’s drunk. they technically weren’t together but yeah that’s… something
@@enthusiasticallydry john got rizz
I thought you said keiran for a second.
@@dukemeiser19The rizz in question: (drunk harassment)
@@dukemeiser19harizzment
@@dukemeiser19hi there, I do got rizz
I love how there a camp interactions that show he stills loves abigail and jack,he just wants to avoid the responsibilitys.He changes for the better when jack is kidnapped.
Edit:Also,even in early chapters at his worst,he calls out dutch for his bad behavior and blames him for their problems.He sounds completely through with him by the end of chapter 4.
And likewise with Dutch by the end of Chapter 4, has grown suspicious of him and believes that Abigail has poisoned John against himself. It explains why he was so paranoid of John being the rat at Lemoyne bank job and planned to leave him to swing in Chapter 6.
Now all we need is “How Historically Accurate is Jack Marston | Character Analysis”
I have another video fro him that i’ll post a poll about, stay tuned
@@dukemeiser19 noice!
He's basiclly just John with less experience. And no one cares about breaking down if a 12 year old is historicly acurate or not.
@@dukemeiser19 what about Red Harlow?
@@randombalkaner4363 if you’re gonna be a jerk then at least get their age right, he’s 19 the last time we see him.
john’s durability is almost cartoonish. it’s insane. obviously johns pretty muscular, but he is a lanky lean fella, second tallest in the gang (besides daddy dutch) so you’d expect him to be… ‘brittle’ i guess.
John’s body is more focused on tanking bullets than building muscle
Isn’t Arthur taller?
@@Mr92094 nah, he’s just wider
@@Mr92094 John and Arthur appear to be around the same height, 5'10" - 5'11" range.
@@cantnevercould9660that's literally just gameplay...
each male NPC in its generality are built off the exact measurements of height to save resources etc.
there are moments or snippets where a playable character is described, to which Arthur is usually & or typically described as a 'big man' there's always emphasis on the 'big man' on Arthur which doesn't just mean that he's bulky with a mesomorphic build at 5'10 - 5'11...
with John on the other hand, his proportional representation via the opening (& many but not all times in cutscenes) shows that he isn't exactly 5'10 - 5'11, however in gameplay then it'd seem like that considering how games are built off regarding designing the measurements if each character, especially in an open-world game.
I've been screwing around with the idea of a John Marston playthrough of Fallout New Vegas, so the question of if he would survive the Fallout wasteland, as presented in the poll, is something I'm genuinely interested in. Nonetheless, yay, the grand sequel to "how historically accurate is Arthur Morgan" exists now and John apparently is too.
the wasteland idea could be good
what the fuck are you doing here Atomic
fr
Fun fact: rodger clark/arthur’s actor milton’s voice actor is a decendant of bill hickock.
Nice
3:53 Standing for 10 seconds without showing he's in any pain after getting shot 20-30 times.
"doesn't e-even hu..."
"Dies"
"he is attacked by a huge ass, fvcking bear" love this line 😂
it was a pretty big, fucking bear
I think something important to remember is that John's very old fashioned for his time. RDR1 takes place in 1911. 1899 was really pushing it for cowboys and outlaws, but 1911 is just 3 years before WW1. Machines are being automated, cars aren't a fad and are quickly becoming an everyday sight, airplanes are a thing and they're gonna start dropping bombs soon, the roaring 20s are less than 10 years away. Everything about John is really kinda dated for his time
true
To be fair John is treated like a time capsule by those around him
In the late 1800s and early 1900s, men who wanted to appear as gentlemanly as possible had very short hair. As well as professional public servants, clerk owners, and most jobs dealing with people on a regular basis
John is like 6’4 in rdr1. When you’re in town or at a farm he towers over everyone and outfits show off his physique and the simpleton is ripped. The 4 years he spent at Beacher’s Hope took the scrawny raspy little boy we are handed after Arthur dies and turned him into a unit
i doubt he’s 6’4”
@@dukemeiser19 probably not but he’s massive in 1
5’10-5’11 seems about right, he was always shorter then Arthur at 6’1
John is not 6'4".
Firstly, that would've made him about 8 - 10 inches taller than most of the male characters, which is not the case.
Secondly, John is not that much taller than Javier who's said to be about 5'8".
While John is probably taller than average, he's not 6'4". He's most likely not even 6'0".
@@cantnevercould9660 6’4 wasn’t an actual guess as it’s tall for todays standards I was simply saying he seemed massive in rdr1
14:50 In Chapter 2, his face is held together with stitches
true
It's never easy to marry duche cinema stereotypical references and actual historical reality for a character at that time, but I think the result is to me is a perfect rack, never too ridiculous nor too believable to grasp the exaggeration from western media.
Would be amazing if you’d cover the legend himself dutch van der linde
Always wondered if the harsh circumstances of the old west can give birth to a maniac like him
i could soon
@@dukemeiser19 that would honestly be great! I could see there being a series including Dutch, Javier, Bill, Micah, and maybe ending with Abigail tbh
3:53 He also got beaten by the Mexican Army, won a fist fight against Aquila (that guy in Ridgewood farm who was built like a bear and got mad that John shot his hat), and in Undead Nightmare, got away walking after experiencing a train crash.
Not to mention he kept standing after being shot 20+ times before dropping dead.
@@Rafapb17 john is just him
He also gets shot in the mission at home with dutch altough i reckon he only got hit by his own binoculars
@@Rafapb17 And here I was thinking Max Payne was made of titanium lmao
Maybe I'm wrong, but I remember at the beginning of chapter one it mentions that John was wounded by a bullet when they escaped the Blackwater heist, so yeah... The bastard is tough to kill.
What about me? Am I "historically accurate", blacklung
maybe
Still find it surprising how he managed to get his guts ripped out by a bear and walk completely fine a minute later lol
Yessssssss we can finally learn about the one and only Rip Van Winkle
Back in the 1800s it was rare for men to be over six foot tall
duke-Duke-DUKE! John is an above average bloke. Cant wait for the RDR1 PC Port as well!
@@Amfneey How historically accurate is amfneey 🎙️🗿
@@dukemeiser19 Big4head and such
its here!!!
the actors for john dutch and arthur gave their characters specific heights in an interview
dutch 6'0
arthur 5'10
john 5'10
its not their real l ife sizes but its been confirmed canon
I know Benjamin Byron Davis said that Dutch was 6'0", but what interview did Roger Clark and Rob Wiethoff say that John and Arthur were 5'10"?
Swear arthur was taller
@@Ezdine_G8261 nope
Idea here could you do some videos going over how historically acruate the gangs in the rdr series are it be really cool to see
@@multidigitunhengedmigit maybe
Johns eye color legit changes
he took compound V
@@dukemeiser19 That explains his deadeye I guess.
From a steely grey color to blue. And tbf, his eye textures weren't very detailed in the first game.
@@dukemeiser19 Oi Dutch, The Pinkertons Done Took Me Wife, And The Braithwaites Done Took Me Kid
@@Durzeo facking diabolical innit
This is a really well put together video. Script is great and the editing is amazing. Great work Duke!
Glad you enjoyed it, thanks for the support 🤙
Didn't even know that you could save the legendary bear mission and do it with John and Sadie. They really thought of everything
Dope editing, dope colouring, dope script, dope duke, I’m on dope, just all around dope stuff
Thanks Waxy
The glaze is crazy
@@ViperBlitzen the glaze is dope, ur dope, everything is just so fucking dope
@@Waxyyy thanks senor waxer
it’s very dope!
Whenever comparing to photos from the time, you have to keep in mind that photography at the time was still a new thing and quite expensive, so people getting photographs (unless it was at a worksite or taken for legal records such as prison intake etc.) would have more often then not tried to go out of their way to clean and 'pretty up' to look their best for their pictures. It's not like today where most pictures are casual and on the fly with little preparation outside of special occasions, almost every photo back then was a special occasion. It's likely most men shaved before getting pictures, stubble was likely very common most of the time. Same with neatly styled hair. Hair was probably loose and unkempt most of the time, especially when working.
Yep fair point
3:20 erm it's our best selves not my last boy 🤓
oops
Would be cool to see an analysis like this for non player characters, like Hosea, Dutch, Micha, the horses even.
i’m currently working on this type of video on Sadie Adler, stay tuned for that 🤙
The bandolier is optional in RDR1, you buy it from the gunsmith.
John Marston resonated so well with me due to how he seemed like the perfect blend of every cowboy from every western I ever saw. To this day, his character is so perfect, I have never once felt a need to play Red Dead Redemption 2.
rdr2 compliments John if you can get over the fact he starts off as a scumbag
see, you got the same feeling everybody else did before RDR2. "Man, John is the best character ever". But let me tell you, as someone who was in the exact same boat, RDR2 was unbelievably good. Like, Arthur is the best video game protagonist and maybe even character I have ever experienced.
@@realdaggerman105 I've seen enough of the game to know there are definitely some awesome things about Arthur, but I'm not trying to ruin something that was so perfect to begin with.
@@BlueJayWaters RDR2 only enhances RDR, trust me. But, if you don’t want to, that’s your choice.
@@realdaggerman105 it seems to me where i go within any RDR video... there's superficiality in the air.
Shame 1 John and epilog john are different characters.
No they aint lol
Agreed. Starkly different characterizations and body types. No a shade on the video or the creator by any means by I would've loved to see this video more with a consistently written John across both games.
@@pandagamer3184 Technically, no, they aren't. But characterization-wise (yeah, I've heard the retorts, I don't agree it's character development) and appearance wise, it's as if they are.
@@themadtitan7603 doing God's work again Titan.
@@themadtitan7603 lowest weight john in rdr2 is pretty accurate to rdr1. Also keep in mind john is not in the best headspace and probably does not sleep a lot in rdr1 making him look older in the face.
w upload i’ve been waiting for this one 🔥
🙌
The disclaimer at the beginning of this video... I feel that on discord voice messages when it doesn't record
1:24 we don't use the metric system in the UK we use imperial
Bro, you are absolutely COOKING on the editing. I also won’t be able to comment or see your videos for a while so I wish you look on your channel and series
@@snokey1153 thank you, stay safe
Duke cooked here! 🔥
You already know mate 🧑🍳
Marston apparently means “Town in a marsh” what exactly the guy who came up with giving that name to his kid and what rockstar intended probably will never be answered I guess. Extra odd since most of the game takes in a desert.
I don’t think the scars are accurate, those look like claw scratches and dogs, especially wolves are not known to use claws to hunt, only bites, hence they don’t retract like cat claws, which are used as weapons. If it was a bite rip it would have to be square. And that brings the question why didn’t they just go for his neck as they’re meant to if they could reach his head.
In Red Dead redemption they were originally supposed to be marks where he was cut across his face in fights
Haven’t seen the vid yet but there had better be a baby eater joke in here somewhere
Edit: Maybe next time
🤷
Duke showcase:
The Grand Green gunslinger
Green bowler hat
Green shotgun coat
(Optional) black Thompson vest
White stand-collar overshirt
Dark brown fancy pants
Dark brown fine leather
suspenders
Brown and black multi-tone half chaps
Brown deluxe QuickDraw boots
Dark Brown & silver gerden rider spurs
Dark green dress tie
Black riding gloves
Upgraded gun belt
Upgraded primary holsters
Upgraded off hand holster
No bandolier
Remove satchel using rampage
Level 6 handlebar mustache
Level 0 chin
Level 0 sideburns
Level 4 left parted fade with pomade
(In some lights the outfit can look black to show the green I would recommend the light of beechers hope)
@@Contigulo the green goblin
@@dukemeiser19damn I should’ve thought of that
21:03 the best part
Spencer carbines in 1899, 1907 or 1911 would have been heavily obsolete, the US Military stopped using them after the Civil War because they wanted to streamline ammunition after having dozens on dozens of calibers from the ACW. That being said they would have been sold off as surplus,
Fish and chip lovers? Lol, In the UK we generally use feet for height and stone for weight.
And what for weight
21:05 😭😭😭😭💀
Fr💀😭
Thank you for the effort you put into making this masterpiece of a video 💯💯
I appreciate that🤙
keep up the long form dukey you always deliver 🔥💜
🧟♀️
Billy the kid turned informant and was betrayed. The fact you didnt find that in your research is crazy. He testified for the state and governor of arizona promised immunity, sheriff still shot him in the dark without declaring himself.
damn
editing just keeps getting better and better, keep it up dude
Appreciate it🤙
2:00 John is Scottish
5:50 John took his first life at 11 and died at 38, Wes Hardin took his first life at 15 and died at 42 meaning they both killed for 27 years.
Great videos btw ive watched ur entire series and enjoyed it tons
Glad you like them🤙
@@dukemeiser19 i appreciate the work u put into them. Surprised u aint got more subs and recognition. Have a good day
these videos are so well done honestly this guy is so entertaining to watch great work bro :D
Glad you like them, thanks for the support 🤙
@@dukemeiser19 np bro keep up the good work with your skill in content creation you have good things coming
@@jamesdoyle5532 thanks for the support 👍
Please do how historically accurate is Red Harlow
eventually yea
How historically accurate is Micah
🐀
Rip van Winkle when do some plastic surgery between RDR2 to an RDR1
They gave him Arthurs chin, neck, and shoulders just to cut some time
The crazy thing to me is that the Wild West and cowboys didn’t happen all that far before WW1 time truly is just a construct
if you want even more of a mind fack, samurai’s and cowboys existed around the same time, and both could’ve served in WW1
cowboys are herders, and animal caretakers. Not gunfighters, cowboys did use guns, not colt saa's though, they were expensive, so they mainly used hand me downs, like percussion revolvers, rifles, or cheaper alternatives like Remington Revolvers, Surplus S&W no.3, if we go into the 1880s, and percussion revolvers. Ones who did get them either saved up to get one, or were rich.
Mythos that come with cowboys are false, sure Little Arkansas, Billy the Kid, Bass were ranch hands. But they were outlaws, robbers, the only gunfighters who actually had a feared and documented fight: Little Arkansas. He actually knew how to fight hand to hand, and was a deadly gunfighter, but like most. He is mostly a myth, and legend, not too documented. Wild Bill Hickok, Wyatt Earp and Doc Holiday, pretty much chalk up to romanticized versions. In reality, they'd be weaker in real life, not exactly what we see in movies.
So the difference in gunfighters: people who have retained a reputation in gunfights, outlaws, lawman, and any other occupation. Cowboys were just ranch hands, basic at everything, or dumb.
The guy that spread the myth of Cowboys being baddasses was embarrassed by his job
another W vid form duke me encantan tus vídeos keep up the good work
@@dinofactsgaming9113 gracias amigo 🤙
Finally i ben waithing for this
Honestly the way that Dutch's gang differs from gangs of the time is almost like a cult, only he didn't have them doing strange things that would be out of the ordinary for gang activity. He was kind of a central personality that a group of people gathered around ideologically. Like a lot of cults though, eventually the idealism meets a reality check, and it all fell apart. I don't think Dutch's gang is implausible along this line of thinking. He's a charismatic man with a strong vision for what freedom means and it spoke to people who were vulnerable like orphans and those who are othered or ostracized, he is skirting that line between gang leader and cult leader.
John's height is never specifically stated to be 5'10". People often use "Made Up Characters Wiki" as a source, but information on that site is non-canon.
However, 5'10" - 5'11" is a plausible height for John.
In the RDR1 mission "Landon Ricketts Rides Again" John mentions that Javier is 5'8". When John and Javier are standing next to each other in "Gates of El Presidio" they seem fairly similar in height, though John in slightly crouching.
In addition, Benjamin Byron Davis (Dutch's voice actor) stated that Dutch was canonically 6 foot, which is significantly above average for men at the time (the average male height in that timeframe would be anywhere between 5'6" - 5'8"). In most scenes, Dutch appears to be taller than most male characters, including John and Arthur.
So while John and Arthur are certainly above average for the timeframe, they're not 6 foot.
yea i had to ask a youtube friend if my and he basically said the same thing
Arthur is 6’ 1 (185 cm) a little smaller than Dutch who is 6’2 foot (188cm) John is 5’11 (179 cm) it makes sense because in a lot of missions in RD2 the people who know arthur and see John says that Arthur was taller . and we know dutch is the tallest
@@Nocoincidoconfichajesdelfutbol Like I said, you got this information from "Made-Up Characters Wiki" which is a site that contains non-canon information.
Benjamin Byron Davis specifically said that Dutch was 6'0". That information is canon because it came directly from an actor (voice and mo-cap).
If Arthur really was 6'1", then he would tower over almost everyone in the game. But he doesn't. He's also not that much taller than Javier, who's 5'8".
Arthur is most likely around the 5'10" - 5'11" range, which would be above average male height in 1899.
He’s got a horse, a gun, and a hat.
That’s enough proof for me.
fair enough
Ive been waiting this longer than gta 6
Wait until part 3, gta 7 will be out by that time
Absolutely
Id suggest dutch breakdown
OMG DUKIE I LOVE THIS VIDEO ❤️❤️❤️😘😍😍😍😍🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
Goat 🥰🥰
21:08 are you fucking kidding me
No, i am not.
I will watch it one day
Ok
YEAH I'M SADIES GOOD BOY I WILL ALWAYS BE HER GOOD BOY
@@Kyoryu_Unshaken ok
Blawg….
@@Fugitive685 Sadie is mine fr
@@Kyoryu_Unshaken Have you ever tried going outside?
@@Fugitive685 I have but that doesn't mean i can't have any hobbies
Yoooooo I was talking about this in stream
yeah maybe johns loyalty is inaccurate but im sure finding a bad bitch with an attitude like abigail in the 1800s was like finding a mechanical pencil on the classroom floor
there were loyal men and john is a prime example
4:31 0.10 Seconds if drawn correctly. I clocked him in at that when I QuickDraw.
amazing
His pant’s in the old game are inaccurate because they have belt loops which were invented until the 1920s.
He got them from Francis Sinclair
You'd need to tell that to the National Baseball League. They had belt loops in 1876
@ from what I see they don’t but they do have belts
A good dlc for rdr2 would probably be all the way back to when Arthur was first adopted by Dutch and Hosea, and they could have a time skip of 5 or 6 years each skip being an hour or 2 of story content with 30 minutes or so worth of side content for each time skip all the way until we get to a couple months to a year before the ferry heists. Thats just an idea I thought would be interesting.
Ain’t glazing but i Never clicked so fast lmao
About time you covered marston
john height is very inconsistent in rdr1 he’s stated to be 6ft in cutscenes in rdr2 he stands the same height as arthur etc
What cutscene in RDR1 is he stated to be 6 foot?
New vid let's celebrate 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
🍾
Please do a video on if John could survive the wasteland 🙏
it’s on the agenda
Nice, the wait is now over lol
pretty much
In the undead nightmare DLC for red dead redemption one John Marston was reanimated into a zombie
@@Dean-Akimbo ues
Theres also a dude called marston johnson or something that was outlaw turned farmer
@@quixotic_077 thanks for the info 👍
@@dukemeiser19 I figured out his name is Mark Johnson
I think the next one you should do is Micah. He seems pretty historically accurate to an average outlaw.
@@michaelthesanta3610 he pretty much is
I'm actually starting my 2nd playthrough of RDR2, and apparently, during the Blackwater Massacre, Javier mentions that John got shot, as well as Davey and Mac Callender, though it could be put up to debate due to the fact there's no evidence or other mentions of John being shot other than this one piece of dialogue, and if anyone's wondering, I'm talking about the 'Enter, Pursued by a Memory' mission in Chapter 1
he could’ve been grazed but with his Marston luck i doubt it
John was definitely shot during the Blackwater heist. He talks about I’m in RDR1 too.
Survived a wolf attack to the head
he just got it like that
you're trying to move a mountain
you’re trying to move a mountain
You're trying to move a mountain
You're trying to move a mountain
If I were you, I'd definitely make more of these videos other than just one more on Jack. I don't doubt they take a lot of work but just my opinion.
@@pureCHiCANEry Yea but the problem is overlapping information. I’d basically be regurgitating what i already said with some slight tweaks
Could have sworn John was 5'11-6'0. Lol.
@@Durzeo he’s lanky but not too tall
@@dukemeiser19hes not lanky
I swear John is 6,2 in rdr1 he’s fucking huge compared to everyone else in game besides bigfoot
15:48 bro is that what i think it is
might be west dickens
Just wanna correct something, John is only impatient with time wasters which is half the cast in the beginning, look at later in the game he actually has to be very patient to get what he wants, which is Javier and Bill, when people constantly try waste his time and fool him around that's when he is cold.
@@badsie1 He was impatient with Reyes and Allende, alongside Captain De Santa
Lets goooo new long from video
I feel like pre 1899 john is gooner and that guy who hates furries but jorks to them, late 1899 john is the quitting his gooning and porn addiction, 1907 john is man not knowing his internet identity, 1911 john is the goat and 1914 john is just hotline miami characters in 1992
Mate, what the fuck?
what
Wtf 💀
Get off the damn internet
You forgot to mention me Duke
I need a Ms. McFarlane sooo bad
@@Bouyasdraco real
Do dutch
Do dutch
Do dutch
Do dutch
Do dutch
Do dutch
Do Javier Escuella next!
I loved the video
I always thought he was 5'9 to 5'10
I would say its pretty accurate
Thanks bro 🙏